Scribd
Upload
8 views3 pages

Frequencies Variables

This document contains frequency tables and crosstabulations analyzing the relationships between age (Umur), parity (Paritas), and index of multiple deprivations (IMD) for 40 cases. The tables show that 11 cases were at risk due to age, 12 at risk due to parity, and 34 with IMD. Crosstabulations found significant associations between both age and IMD (p=0.02) and parity and IMD (p=0.002), with those at higher risk more likely to have IMD.

Uploaded by

Agustina Sister
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8 views3 pages

Frequencies Variables

This document contains frequency tables and crosstabulations analyzing the relationships between age (Umur), parity (Paritas), and index of multiple deprivations (IMD) for 40 cases. The tables show that 11 cases were at risk due to age, 12 at risk due to parity, and 34 with IMD. Crosstabulations found significant associations between both age and IMD (p=0.02) and parity and IMD (p=0.002), with those at higher risk more likely to have IMD.

Uploaded by

Agustina Sister
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Frequencies

Statistics
Umur Paritas IMD
N Valid 40 40 40
Missing 0 0 0

Frequency Table

Umur
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Beresiko 11 27.5 27.5 27.5
Tidak Beresiko 29 72.5 72.5 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

Paritas
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Beresiko 12 30.0 30.0 30.0
Tidak Beresiko 28 70.0 70.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

IMD
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid IMD 34 85.0 85.0 85.0
Tidak IMD 6 15.0 15.0 100.0
Total 40 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Umur *
40 100.0% 0 0.0% 40 100.0%
IMD
Umur * IMD Crosstabulation
IMD
IMD Tidak IMD Total
Umur Beresiko Count 7 4 11
% within Umur 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%
% within IMD 20.6% 66.7% 27.5%
% of Total 17.5% 10.0% 27.5%
Tidak Beresiko Count 27 2 29
% within Umur 93.1% 6.9% 100.0%
% within IMD 79.4% 33.3% 72.5%
% of Total 67.5% 5.0% 72.5%
Total Count 34 6 40
% within Umur 85.0% 15.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 85.0% 15.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig. (2- Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 5.431 1 .020
Continuity
3.366 1 .067
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 4.841 1 .028
Fisher's Exact Test .039 .039
Linear-by-Linear
5.295 1 .021
Association
N of Valid Cases 40
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.65.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Paritas *
40 100.0% 0 0.0% 40 100.0%
IMD

Paritas * IMD Crosstabulation


IMD
IMD Tidak IMD Total
Paritas Beresiko Count 7 5 12
% within Paritas 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%
% within IMD 20.6% 83.3% 30.0%
% of Total 17.5% 12.5% 30.0%
Tidak Beresiko Count 27 1 28
% within Paritas 96.4% 3.6% 100.0%
% within IMD 79.4% 16.7% 70.0%
% of Total 67.5% 2.5% 70.0%
Total Count 34 6 40
% within Paritas 85.0% 15.0% 100.0%
% within IMD 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 85.0% 15.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig. (2- Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.561a 1 .002
Continuity
6.807 1 .009
Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 8.888 1 .003
Fisher's Exact Test .006 .006
Linear-by-Linear
9.322 1 .002
Association
N of Valid Cases 40
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is 1.80.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

You might also like