Literature Review Is The Backbone of Research
Literature Review Is The Backbone of Research
Embarking on a research journey is akin to exploring uncharted territories. To navigate through the
vast sea of knowledge and reach meaningful conclusions, researchers rely heavily on literature
reviews. These comprehensive assessments of existing literature serve as the backbone of any
scholarly endeavor, providing crucial insights, context, and direction. However, crafting a literature
review can be a daunting task, demanding meticulous attention to detail, extensive research, and
proficient writing skills.
At its core, a literature review involves synthesizing and analyzing a plethora of scholarly articles,
books, and other relevant sources related to the research topic. This process requires not only
identifying key themes, theories, and findings but also critically evaluating the credibility and
significance of each source. Moreover, researchers must seamlessly integrate these insights into their
own work, demonstrating a deep understanding of the subject matter while maintaining clarity and
coherence.
Yet, the challenges don't end there. Crafting a literature review demands patience, perseverance, and
time – luxuries often in short supply for busy researchers. With deadlines looming and pressure
mounting, many find themselves overwhelmed by the sheer magnitude of the task. In such moments,
seeking assistance becomes not just an option but a necessity.
This is where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ steps in as a beacon of support and expertise. Our team of
experienced writers specializes in crafting impeccable literature reviews tailored to your specific
research needs. Whether you're struggling to sift through mountains of literature or grappling with
structuring your review, we're here to lighten your load and elevate your research to new heights.
1. Expertise: Our writers possess advanced degrees in various fields, ensuring that your
literature review is meticulously researched and impeccably written.
2. Customization: We understand that every research project is unique. That's why we work
closely with you to tailor your literature review to your precise requirements and preferences.
3. Timeliness: With our efficient workflow and dedicated team, we guarantee timely delivery
without compromising on quality, allowing you to meet even the tightest deadlines.
4. Confidentiality: Your privacy is our utmost priority. Rest assured that all communication and
transactions are handled with the strictest confidentiality.
Don't let the daunting prospect of crafting a literature review hinder your research progress. Unlock
the full potential of your work with ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ by your side. Order now and embark on a
journey towards scholarly excellence.
Roughly how many sources would be appropriate to include? 2. Keep in mind that UNC Libraries
have research guides and to databases relevant to many fields of study. Finally, average impact
scores increased over time with two notable growth periods. Essentially, you should provide the
reader with a high-level roadmap of your chapter to give them a taste of the journey that lies ahead.
Long story short, the second essential ingredient of a high-quality literature review is a critical
discussion of the existing empirical research. Avoiding Bad Stats and the Benefits of Playing Trivia
with Friends: PancakesC. PDF version of this title (4.5M) Disable Glossary Links In this Page
Introduction Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps Types of Review Articles and
Brief Illustrations Concluding Remarks Related information PMC PubMed Central citations
PubMed Links to PubMed Recent Activity Chapter 9?Methods for Literature Reviews - Handbook
of eHealth Evaluation: An Ev. Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to help
researchers eliminate studies that are not aligned with the research questions. When writing your
review, keep in mind these issues. Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A Complete Guide to
Everything You’ll Ever Write. Types of Literature Reviews What are the parts of a Literature
Review. But how is a literature review different from an academic research paper. Now consider
some typical ways of organizing the sources into a review: Chronological: If your review follows the
chronological method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were
published. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within
each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. If you are writing a literature review as a
stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct
your search. APA7 Style resources APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers 1. Note I do
say SPECIFIC bits, which should also be meaningful and well-explained. “This text is set in China,
which influenced the Chinese setting of my short story” may be accurate, but not especially specific
or strong. “This text about the experiences of the Chinese Jewish diaspora in Shanghai helped me to
build authentic Chinese Jewish characters in my short story” is a lot better. Interestingly, their
research appeared to be the first research to link individual resilience factors with community
resilience factors. Systematic reviewsLiterature reviews Meta-analyses 4. Literature reviews can take
two major forms. The most prevalent one is the “literature review” or “background” section within a
journal paper or a chapter in a graduate thesis. What methods will you utilize to analyze the research
problem. The authors conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases to identify eligible
reviews and subsequently used a validated instrument to conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. Don’t
be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. What strategies can be
used to organize and structure a literature review. A literature review may also provide a thorough
and critical outline of the intellectual developments in a field with a focus on major, and often
polemical, debates. I put up a post about a week back but the gist is pretty much this: If you want
feedback on part of or your entire major, please fill in this form. Unitary structure, the most common
structure, can be described as single and separate unit without any divisions in which the heads of
each major function directly reports to the top. Both authors independently reviewed each of the
identified articles to determine eligibility and extract study information. Thematic: If you have found
some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can
organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. How to
Address Rebuttal Statements on Your Essays.
There are also several extra points that may be clarified with the literature review examples. Works
Cited. A Works Cited page is a list of sources (books, journals, websites, periodicals, etc.) one has
used for researching a topic. The all-new literature review is the second formal assessment of the new
EE2 syllabus and worth 40% (the most) of your internal mark. Four inclusion and three exclusion
criteria were utilized during the screening process. Making it the most accurate and reliable
proofreading tool for students. Below are the general guidelines on which this part is usually based.
This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. Tip We've also compiled a few
examples, templates, and sample outlines for you below. The following provides a brief description
of the content of each: Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as
the central theme or organizational pattern. You can simply put the word “review” in your search
engine along with your other topic terms to find articles of this type on the Internet or in an
electronic database. Some short quotes here and there are okay, though, if you want to emphasize a
point, or if what the author said just cannot be rewritten in your own words. This structure will both
be informed and supported by all the papers you select to be in the lit review. Unleashing the Power
of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. Sheppard is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where
otherwise noted. How to Address Rebuttal Statements on Your Essays. This post is based on our
popular online course, Literature Review Bootcamp. Is it manageable? Begin writing down terms that
are related to your question. For these organisations, rating performance has never consisted of
financial. To structure a good literature review, you should create a complete concept in your mind.
Revise as needed to improve the overall quality and effectiveness of your literature review. This
study, as well as Kotter’s model, will serve as the basis for the Business Change Strategy of my
Application. In terms of corporate governance, the correlation between ownership structure and firm
performance has been an important topic and the scholars pay sustaining interest on it. Systematic
reviewsLiterature reviews Meta-analyses 4. Introduce the literature review by pointing out the major
research topic that will be discussed. A good literature review doesn't just summarise sources - it
analyses, synthesises, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the
subject. This can lead directly into your methodology section. Use Evidence A literature review
section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. The existence of the AFAQ app is
expected to fill in the latest medium for accurate information relating to the al-Aqsa Mosque and
Baitul Maqdis that every Muslim needs to know. To use The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins
Gilman as an example of a piece of work in your chosen form (in this case a short story), you might
comment on the use of first person, or the extended metaphor of the yellow wallpaper, and how this
has shaped the development of your first person narrator as an intimate window into the female
psyche. Their in-depth analysis of the literature signalled that there is little solid evidence from
randomized controlled trials or other studies through the use of phr s.
A combination of sources strengthens a literature review, leveraging the strengths of each while
mitigating their respective limitations. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should
be aware of and consider as you go through your own study. You check out our literature review,
Unitary structure, the most common structure, can be described as single and separate unit without
any divisions in which the heads of each major function directly reports to the top. As a publication,
a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing,
synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. Other Sections of Your Literature Review
Once you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need
to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational
strategy. What am I supposed to do? (Again, please note that the below is based on the sample
assessment material, and not indicative of your school’s requirements. Finally, you can write your
literature review, drawing on what you have learned from the relevant literature. Reviews Tips for
Writing Literature Reviews Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites Citation Resources Other
Academic Writings What are Literature Reviews. If it is part of a larger research project, the
literature review helps you to identify the parameters of your study. Instantly correct all language
mistakes in your text Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. However, since Fowler’s work is
based largely within a Western Christian setting, some attention to differences in faith among class
members would have been a useful addition to the study. Below, is the complete outline that you can
take as a guide to structure your good literature review. Look at sources the authors cite to in their
work. Essentially, this section of the research proposal should be clearly tied to the specific objectives
of your study; however, it is also important to draw upon and include examples from the literature
review that relate to your design and intended methods. By critically evaluating the literature,
researchers can discern gaps, paving the way for valuable contributions and shaping the focus of
their research. Wiser workshop 27 th January 2010. Overview. What is a literature review. The goal is
to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a
clearly defined research problem. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and
synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions. Scribbr slides are
free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes. The post in the link is just general
advice but she also has stuff on the reflection statement. Avoid bias, overly descriptive writing, and
overlooking recent publications. Present findings objectively without favoring specific viewpoints.
Be sure to carefully follow your citation style guide for reference list formatting. Balancing scope is
crucial; a well-defined scope ensures relevance, while a thoughtful expansion accommodates
essential diversity, optimizing the literature review's depth and breadth to align with research
objectives. Structurally distinct, they typically commence with an introduction outlining the topic
and purpose, followed by a main body that analyzes existing literature, and a conclusion highlighting
key findings and identifying research gaps. Develop general explanation for observed variations. The
specific goals were to investigate how outcomes are produced and, most importantly, how variations
in outcomes can be explained. International, Masters Abstract International, etc. Unleashing the
Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. Two members of the research
team selected the articles using a pre-established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria and following
a two-step procedure.
Elizabeth Thompson Professor Stacks English 102 20 August 2001 Stem Cell Research: An
Annotated Bibliography. The conclusion should: summarise the important aspects of the existing
body of literature; evaluate the current state of the literature reviewed; identify significant flaws or
gaps in existing knowledge; outline areas for future study; link your research to existing knowledge.
We highly recommend that prospective authors of narrative reviews consult these useful sources
before embarking on their work. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further.
What are the requirements of a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) that meet. Works consulted
We consulted these works while writing this handout. Brief Assignment 4 Small group discussion:
You evaluate annotations Small group discussion: You write citations Draft 1.1 Prep Assignment
Draft 1.1. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred. This presentation
attempts to throw some light on the process and important aspects of literature review. Use the
bibliographies and references of research studies you find to locate others. A methodological scope
will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are
discussed. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed
without permission. Both authors independently reviewed each of the identified articles to determine
eligibility and extract study information. Anyway, none of this is official NESA material and I’d
highly encourage you to check out the full set of documents here. Might it have prompted you to
think about poetry as investigation, for instance. A ready-made example of literature review helps to
know how to get started properly without straggling with irrelevant information and searching
through tons of unnecessary materials. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,”
and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably. Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the
literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature
review sections. Technology started developing at a rate that necessitated more and ongoing. The
authors conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases to identify eligible reviews and
subsequently used a validated instrument to conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. You should
always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to
be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other
genre. The summary effect size is a value that reflects the average magnitude of the intervention
effect for a particular outcome of interest or, more generally, the strength of a relationship between
two variables across all studies included in the systematic review. How can a literature review help in
formulating research questions. Should you summarize, synthesize, or critique your sources by
discussing a common theme or issue. You need to show that you’ve thought through any changes,
and addressed the issues raised in the critical questions. This nuanced approach demonstrates a
comprehensive understanding of the topic and encourages critical thinking, enriching the literature
review with a nuanced and well-rounded perspective. It draws from diverse sources such as books,
journal articles, and government reports. In other words, your introduction needs to give the reader a
taste of what’s to come, and how you’re going to lay that out. A literature review is an overview of
the topic, an explanation of how publications differ from one another, and an examination of how
each publication contributes to the. What role does historical context play in a literature review.
If so, should research be conducted to address this gap. How The Diverse Labor Force Management
Improves Individual. What worked about Sample B that didn’t in Sample A. By statistically
combining data from multiple studies, meta-analyses can create more precise and reliable estimates of
intervention effects than those derived from individual studies alone, when these are examined
independently as discrete sources of information. Methodological: A methodological approach
differs from the two above in that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content
of the material. The main procedures of a systematic review involve: Formulating a review question
and developing a search strategy based on explicit inclusion criteria for the identification of eligible
studies (usually described in the context of a detailed review protocol). This is not a comprehensive
list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find
additional publications. In-text citations are key to a good literature review. This is most common
when the research problem is defined early on and remains relatively unchanged. Identifies major
themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic. In other words, your discussion in those sections needs
to start laying the foundation for the research gap. Management Information Systems Quarterly.
2002; 26 (2):11. Whitlock E. P., Lin J. S., Chou R., Shekelle P., Robinson K.A. Using existing
systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has
given you. Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of
pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending
upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Write the review Thompson Writing Studio This
link opens in a new window Need to write a systematic review. So, this section is where you’ll pin
down what exactly you mean when you refer to X, Y or Z in your study, as well as why you chose
that specific definition. Usually, the reference list (or bibliography) is not included in the word count
of the research proposal. A set of predetermined rules provides a basis for including or excluding
certain studies. This is where you’ll present, analyse, evaluate and synthesise the existing research.
One should also take the following vital steps to ensure a well-structured and effective review. In
other words, after grappling with the literature you’ll have an opinion about what the trends and
concerns are in the field as well as what’s lacking. For more inf. If it is part of a larger research
project, the literature review helps you to identify the parameters of your study. A short story can be
character or plot-driven, is written in a literary style, etc. Find out what style guide you are required
to follow (e.g., APA, MLA, ASA) Follow the guidelines to format citations and create a reference
list or bibliography Cite Your Sources This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. But there is still a lack of robust research on
highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your
own research. Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide
the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles,
the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. Take notes that you can later
incorporate into the text of your literature review. This is most common when the research problem is
defined early on and remains relatively unchanged. Well, the research gap should serve as the core
justification for your study. A good, well-explained structure is also a huge help to the reader.
Structure. As with any piece of extended writing, structure is crucial.
In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are
writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.
Books provide in-depth analysis but might be less current. Information systems researchers, among
others, have contributed to advancing knowledge on how to structure a “traditional” review. Table of
contents Why write a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant
literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4:
outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write your literature review, frequently asked
questions about literature reviews, introduction. You can use it to discuss various theories, models,
and definitions of key concepts. How can a literature review support or challenge existing theories.
While the study focuses on one topic, harpoon technology, it will still be organized chronologically.
A robust grasp of a work's historical backdrop enhances our comprehension and appreciation of the
narrative. Ethical considerations in a literature review involve proper citation to credit original
authors, avoiding plagiarism, and ensuring transparency in source selection. Writing the Literature
Review: A Practical Guide suggests these steps: Chose a review topic and develop a research
question Locate and organize research sources Select, analyze and annotate sources Evaluate
research articles and other documents Structure and organize the literature review Develop
arguments and supporting claims Synthesize and interpret the literature Put it all together What is the
purpose of writing a literature review. It's crucial to represent sources accurately and objectively,
acknowledging diverse viewpoints. Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for
educational purposes. Once you’ve decided on the organizational method for the body of the review,
the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out. The review ends with a
conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific
study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps
identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed. If you have limited time to
conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. Cite this
Scribbr article If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite
this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator. When
writing a literature review, be sure to use your own words and cite all of your sources properly to
avoid plagiarism How to get started with writing a literature review. Narrative Exploration of New
Categories at Mondelez Narrative Exploration of New Categories at Mondelez Time-Honored
Wisdom: African Teachings for VUCA Leaders Time-Honored Wisdom: African Teachings for
VUCA Leaders Uncovering Consumers’ Hidden Narratives Uncovering Consumers’ Hidden
Narratives 2023 MAP Data Analysis - St. This landscape informs the reader that the author has
indeed assimilated all (or the vast majority of) previous, significant works in the field into her or his
research. Identifies critical gaps and points of disagreement. Was the research funded by a source
that could influence the findings. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines
require that you use information that is as current as possible. A literature review enhances the
research process by providing a comprehensive understanding of existing knowledge on a topic.
There will be experienced markers present (one of whom taught me very briefly in Year 11) who
assuredly have far more extensive knowledge than me about EE2. Professional Conclusion of
Literature Review Examples. By this time, you would’ve already undertaken a good deal of research
into concept and form, and gained a strong understanding of both. Dr Cheryl Lange. Integral aspects
of academic work. These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr )
systems including design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. A
literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, dissertations, conference proceedings and other
resources which are relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory and provides context for
a researcher’s own work. Instead, researchers often present studies that are representative of most
works published in a particular area and they consider a specific time frame to be mapped.