ZIAUDDIN UNIVERSITY

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND

MANAGEMENT

COURSE NAME
LAB REPORT

SEMESTER I

BATCH_____

YEAR______

NAME: _____________________

R.NO: ______________________

Course In-charge Lab Instructor

Engr. Hira Zahid Engr. Syed Hassan Sarwar

 ZIAUDDIN UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Mr. / Ms. _______________________________________

bearing Enrollment no. _______________ of ___Semester Biomedical Engineering
has satisfactorily completed the necessary lab work for the course of Course Name
prescribed by the Department of ??, Ziauddin University Faculty of Engineering,
Science, Technology and Management, under my supervision for the academic
session _________

____________________________________ ____________________________________

Course In-charge Lab In-charge

Engr. Hira Zahid Engr. Syed Hassan Sarwar
Assistant Professor Lab Engineer
Biomedical Engineering Department Biomedical Engineering Department
 ZIAUDDIN UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT

CLOs and PLOs detail for the lab of Introduction to Computing

CLO-1. Imitate the fundamental expressions, commands, functions and statements of C language
using Code Blocks. [P-2] [PLO-5]

CLO-2. Attempt to use the options and features of different daily-use and modern applications
and online services on desktop/computers and mobile phones. [P-2] [PLO-5]
 ZIAUDDIN UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT

Lab Marks Distribution

Course Name

S.No. Lab Assessment Marks (50)

1 Lab Report 10

2 Final Lab Performance 10

3 Lab Exam Viva 10

4 Project 20
 RUBRICS
Lab Performance (Continuous Assessment) / Performance Test

Group/Student: Course: ITC

Sr.# Performance
Indicator Exemplary (5) Satisfactory (4-3) Developing (2-1)
Unsatisfactory (0)

Fully understands the Has very good Has some understanding of the Has poor understanding
software tools understanding of the software tools including its of the software tools
including its purpose software tools including purpose and able to conduct including its purpose
1 Ability to Conduct and quite able to conduct its purpose and able to experiment with a lot of help from and unable to conduct
Experiment the entire experiment conduct experiment with lab instructor experiment on his own;
with negligible help from some help from lab lab instructor provides
lab instructor instructor help in almost every step
of the experiment
Has an excellent Has good programming skill Has weak programming skill and Has poor programming skill,
programming skill. and able to make the able to produce code in quit less unable to write code and
Always able to make acceptable programming logical manner. Output results has no ability to identify and
Implementation the logics for given logic most of the times and are not that clear. remove the coding errors
2 and Results programming produce code with desired even with instructor’s help.
problems and output results for a given Unable to produce the
produce a high- problem output results.
quality code with
desired output
results.
Program produces correct Program produces correct Program approaches correct Program does not produce
3 Correctness answers or appropriate answers or appropriate answers or appropriate results for correct answers or
results for all inputs tested. results for most inputs most input, but can contain appropriate results for most
miscalculations in some cases. inputs
 RUBRICS
Lab Reports/Assignments
Group/Student: Course:

Sr.# Performance
Indicator Exemplary (5) Satisfactory (4-3) Developing (2-1)
Unsatisfactory (0)

Information is presented in a Information is presented Information is presented in quite less Unable to submit the lab
logical, interesting way, which in somewhat logical continuity and less logical manner. report.
is easy to follow. All sections manner. All sections are Sections are not in proper order as
1 Organization / are in a correct order and in a correct order as directed and unable to follow the
Structure submitted on a time. directed and submitted on submission deadline.
a time.
Results and conclusion are Results and conclusion Results and conclusion are stated Unable to submit the
stated and reflect complete are stated and reflect but reflect little knowledge of the lab report.
knowledge of the experiment. acceptable knowledge of experiment. Code is not properly
Each and every line of the the experiment. Each and explained with comments.
2 Data Presentation code fully explained with every line of the code
comments and outputs/ screen somehow explained with .
shot are attached. comments and outputs/
screen shot are attached.
Document presented/submitted Document Document presented/submitted for Document
for review purely reflect student presented/submitted for review must reflect student presented/submitted for
understanding and should not review must reflect understanding with two sections review is copied from an
be copied from any online student understanding copied from any online or resembles online source or resembles
3 Originality / Uniqueness source and should not with a section copied from that of classmate that of their class mates
resembles that of their any online source or clearly indicating lack of
classmate resembles that of understanding
classmate
Document submitted on the Document submitted on Document submitted on the date and Document not submitted on
4 Timely Submission date and day assigned with all the date and day day assigned with two missing the date and day assigned
the necessary sections assigned with one sections
missing sections
 RUBRICS
Viva Voce
Group/Student: Course:

Sr.# Performance
Indicator Exemplary (5) Satisfactory (4-3) Developing (2-1)
Unsatisfactory (0)

Responds well, quick and Generally Responsive and Responsive but evasive or Non-responsive.
1 Responsiveness to very accurate all the time. accurate most of the times. inaccurate most of the times.
Questions/Accuracy

Demonstration of full At ease with content Only basic concepts No grasp of information.
knowledge of the and able to elaborate are demonstrated Clearly no knowledge of
subject with and explain to some and interpreted. subject matter. No
2 Level of explanations and degree. questions are answered. No
Understanding of elaboration. interpretation made.
the learned skills
 RUBRICS
Lab Project/ Open Ended Labs
Group/Student: Course: ______________________

Sr.# Performance
Indicator Exemplary (5) Satisfactory (4-3) Developing (2-1) Unsatisfactory (0)
Project Design
(Hardware/Software)
Project is completed with quite
less technical assistance from Project is completed but not
the instructor or others in order working properly. The project is not
to complete the project and is implemented or not completed
working properly. Or with implementation in initial
Project is completed without
1 phase only.
Implementation and any external assistance and
Or Project is completed and
completion is working properly.
working properly but with
Project is completed with no unreasonable amount of
external assistance at all but technical assistance from the
is not working properly. instructor or others in order to
complete the project.

Student chose an
Problem Analysis innovative, challenging Student chose a complex Student chose a project with Student chose a simple
2 and Designing project that required an project with good technical acceptable scope that solves a project with limited scope that
Solution effort that exceeds the challenges that required technical problem and required required very little creative
normal expectations for innovative problem solving and some technical expertise in development or technical
the course projects. engineering. hardware and/or software. expertise.
 Project Report

Information is presented in Information is presented in Information is presented in quite Unable to submit the lab
a logical, interesting way, somewhat logical manner. less continuity and less logical report.
which is easy to follow. All All sections are in a manner. Sections are not in
Organization / Structure sections are in a correct correct order as directed proper order as directed unable to
1 order and submitted on a and submitted on a time. follow the submission deadline.
time.

Literature Review Collected a great deal of Collected some basic Collected very little information-- Did not collect any information
2 information--all relates to information--most relates some relates to the topic that relates to the topic
the topic. to the topic.
.
 Generally clear Reader can gain very little
Clearly discusses what Limited discussion of results and
discussion of results and conclusions. Little or no reference to information about why the
results mean and what
conclusions, but may project was done and what the
conclusions may be published standards or other reports.
Results and miss some points. Some . results may mean. No
drawn from them. Cites
3 Discussion use of references and reference to other studies.
published standards or
published standards.
other related reports.

Project Viva

Responds well, quick and Generally Responsive Responsive but evasive or inaccurate Non-responsive.
1 Responsiveness to very accurate all the time. and accurate most of the most of the times.
Questions/Accuracy times.

2 Demonstration of full At ease with content Only basic concepts No grasp of information.
Depth of
Knowledge knowledge of the and able to elaborate are demonstrated Clearly no knowledge of
project with and explain to some and interpreted. subject matter. No questions
explanations and degree. are answered. No interpretation
elaboration. made.
 TABLE OF CONTENT
S.No. Lab Objectives CLO PLO Domain Marks

Attempt to get system specifications and

to create various windows folders and
1 2 5 P2
utilities and become familiar with them by
performing related tasks.
Attempt to explore MS Word, use its
2 different options to perform different tasks 2 5 P2
and get familiar with them.
Attempt to explore MS PowerPoint, use its
3 different options to perform different tasks 2 5 P2
and get familiar with them.
Attempt to explore MS Excel, use its
4 different options to perform different tasks 2 5 P2
and get familiar with them.

5
 ZIAUDDIN UNIVERSITY FACUTY OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE,
TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SEMESTER I

LAB # 01
Object: Attempt to get system specifications and to create various windows folders and
utilities and become familiar with them by performing related tasks.

Theory:

<All overview, tutorial, guide and detail about software, tools, applications, services,
commands, etc.>

Lab Tasks:

<Work and tasks done during the lab session>

Post Lab Task 1:

<tasks given to do after the lab session. Include tasks question, answer, work done for it, steps,
elaboration and brief explanation>

Post Lab Task 2:

Conclusion:

< Summary of the lab. What we did and learned >

INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTING LAB REPORT 1