Understanding the Importance of Literature Review in EVS Projects

A literature review is an integral part of any Environmental Studies (EVS) project, providing a
comprehensive overview of existing research and knowledge in the field. However, crafting a
literature review can be a daunting task for many students due to its complexity and the vast amount
of information available. Here, we delve into the intricacies of writing a literature review for an EVS
project and offer valuable insights.

The primary purpose of a literature review in an EVS project is to establish a solid foundation of
understanding and contextualize the research topic within the broader scholarly discourse. It involves
identifying, analyzing, and synthesizing relevant literature, including peer-reviewed articles, books,
reports, and other sources, to gain insights into the subject matter.

One of the main challenges students face when writing a literature review is the sheer volume of
literature available. Navigating through numerous sources while ensuring relevance and credibility
can be overwhelming. Additionally, synthesizing diverse perspectives and findings into a coherent
narrative requires critical thinking and analytical skills.

Moreover, structuring the literature review in a logical and organized manner poses another
challenge. It involves categorizing sources, identifying key themes or trends, and presenting them in
a clear and systematic fashion. Proper citation and referencing according to academic conventions
further add to the complexity.

Given these challenges, seeking assistance from reputable academic writing services can be
immensely beneficial. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert guidance and support to students struggling
with their literature reviews. Our team of experienced writers specializes in EVS and related
disciplines, ensuring high-quality and customized solutions tailored to your specific requirements.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and effort while
ensuring excellence in your academic endeavors. Our professionals conduct thorough research,
critically evaluate sources, and craft well-structured and compelling literature reviews that meet the
highest standards of academic rigor.

In conclusion, a literature review is an essential component of any EVS project, serving as a

roadmap for further research and inquiry. While it may pose challenges for students, seeking
assistance from reputable academic writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can alleviate the
burden and enhance the quality of your work. Trust us to deliver exceptional results and propel your
academic success forward.
Citation software is a centralized, online location for managing your sources. INDIA AND ITS
COUNTERPARTS IN EVs SECTOR- DOES INDIA IS DOING WELL. This may be necessary to
some extent, but in this case a focused review would only deal in detail with those studies at the
interface between epidemiology and the spread of ideas. Schneider mentions using different
resources to make better batteries (403). There is an impending increase in the costs of many rare
materials used in the. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify
relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper,
thesis, or dissertation topic. Authors, Sutton, Clowes, Preson, and Booth, in their 2019 article
identifed and categorized 48 review types. Types of Literature Review Systematic literature review
can be divided into two categories: meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. They find that the literature
compellingly demonstrates that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels significantly
influence the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Mining is a very profitable business and it also
creates. Produced for Erasmus University Rotterdam joint research institute. If you are writing the
literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to
your research problem and questions. In the fields of health sciences and medical informatics,
reviews that focus on examining the range, nature and evolution of a topic area are described by
Anderson, Allen, Peckham, and Goodwin (2008) as mapping reviews. Things in the sky. sun.
MOON. STARS. EARTH. SUN. A big ball of fire. SUN. Rises in the east and sets in the west.
These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr ) systems including
design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. By addressing these
elements, your introduction will empower your literature review to play a pivotal role in your thesis
or dissertation research. Because of the different methods of charging possible, the emissions
produced have been quantified. If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or
research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions. You
need a resolution because, as readers, we would like to know what happened to the characters.
Understanding these factors may lead to public health policy changes that are more lenient on
immigrants and aid the wider community. Third, add transitions between the paragraphs, as well as
an introductory and concluding paragraph. 1 A literature review that is part of a larger research paper
typically does not have to be exhaustive. By addressing these elements, your introduction will
provide a clear and structured overview of what readers can expect in your literature review paper.
Importantly, narrative reviews can also be used as educational articles to bring practitioners up to
date with certain topics of issues ( Green et al., 2006 ). Recently, there have been several efforts to
introduce more rigour in narrative reviews that will elucidate common pitfalls and bring changes into
their publication standards. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches. These
sections serve to establish a scholarly basis for the research or discussion within the paper. In fact,
most manufacturers are planning to launch vehicles in other countries or have launched. I’m doing a
research project topic; stool analysis for parasitic worm (enteric) worm, how do I structure it, thanks.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. Purpose Of A
Literature Review Why Every Academic Paper Needs a Literature Review As a seasoned writer, I
believe that every academic paper must include a literature review. Revolo is a plug-in parallel hybrid
technology that can be retrofitted in both existing and new cars.
Spending a lot of time revising is a wise idea, because your main objective is to present the material,
not the argument. In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the
literature and emphasise their significance. While this is a desirable attribute, it has also evoked.
Similarly, in courses at UCSD, you may be asked to write a research paper that is itself a literature
review (such as, with an instructor’s permission, in fulfillment of the B.S. Degree Research Paper
requirement). There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant. Often, the
literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a
particular way. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly
conversation on a topic over time. There are several ways to locate suitable material: Module
bibliography: for undergraduate dissertations, look first at the bibliography provided with the module
documentation. If you use competent help writing a literature review, this problem will vanish.
Searches are optimized (for example, by your location), thwarting the replicability criteria of most
literature review types Low level of subject and author collocation - that is, bringing together all
works by one author or one sub-topic Challenging to run searches that involve common words. This
lack of analysis in the study prevents it from reaching its full potential and brings to question the
conclusions drawn in the study. SciSpace Discover helps you assess the quality of a source by
providing an overview of its references, citations, and performance metrics. Mismanagement of
Kurdistan’s natural resources and the degradation of its natural environmental are among examples
of this disenfranchisement. It involves a detailed and comprehensive plan and search strategy
derived from a set of specified research questions. Lithium ion is the least toxic of the three
mentioned above. With reviews, the usual subdivision of research papers into introduction, methods,
results, and discussion does not work or is rarely used. The examples listed below are all designed to
serve a more specific purpose. People in Japan have accepted the Nissan Leaf well and it has won
awards (Hibbert 25). If you are asked to write a literature review, and you are an undergraduate
student, be guided by your subject coordinator or lecturer. During April 2012 Indian Government
has planned to unveil the roadmap for the. Though it was found that majority of the people daily
travel around 80km, however still most of. PDF LITERATURE REVIEWS WRITING A
TARGETED LITERATURE REVIEW a targeted literature review is NOT. A second screen of full-
text articles, again by two independent members of the research team, ensured that the studies
described phr s. Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and
synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and
perspectives on the topic are generated. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. The
survey was taken with the help of 60 respondents out of which. Possible alternatives to lithium-ion
batteries have already surfaced. What are the key concepts and how are they defined. For example,
if your research paper is describing an experiment on fear conditioning, then you will probably need
to provide an overview of prior research on fear conditioning. This includes a significant increase in
basic knowledge of LBTI transmission, symptoms, and treatments.
A methodology has become the most important point and must be presented exhaustively and in a
concise manner. Institute of Medicine. (2011). Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for
Systematic Reviews. The study was carried out across 17 countries covering 13,500 respondents.
I’m asked to do conceptual, theoretical and empirical literature, and i just don’t know how to
structure it Submit a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. There are
various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. The protocols and distinctions for
review types are particularly delineated in health research fields, but we are seeing conventions
quickly establishing themselves in other academic fields. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a
list of keywords related to your research question. Upload Read for free FAQ and support Language
(EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd. The research team
started with an exploratory review of background documents and research studies to identify ways in
which patient portals may contribute to health service delivery and patient outcomes. Chronological:
A chronological review is used when the author wants to demonstrate the progression of how a
theory, methodology, or issue has progressed over time. And don’t forget to tap into your professor’s
(or other professors’) knowledge in the field. That’s why we’ve introduced relevant additional
features: “Top Writer” (one of the top-30) and “Premium Writer” (one of the top-10). Anson, Chris
M., and Robert A. Schwegler. 2010. The Longman Handbook for Writers and Readers, 6th ed. To
this end, the authors resorted to using narrative analysis and synthesis to describe the effectiveness
of handheld computers on accessing information for clinical knowledge, adherence to safety and
clinical quality guidelines, and diagnostic decision-making. For a broad overview, a narrative review
might be suitable, while a systematic review is ideal for an in-depth analysis. Be selective Select only
the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. If the literature review is part of
your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new
knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework
for your research. Q.4. Is most of your daily travelling in city, on the highway or mixed. To help you
build a conceptual framework for empirical testing (if applicable to your research topic). Narrative
review also draws conclusions about the topic and identifies gaps or inconsistencies in a body of
knowledge. The current study can also contribute to the existing literature to improve care and public
health policies. This may include empirical studies or conceptual papers that initiated a line of
investigation, changed how problems or questions were framed, introduced new methods or
concepts, or engendered important debate ( Cooper, 1988 ). The guidance and support received from
all the members who contributed the nonteaching staff, the library staff was vital for the success of
the project. Are you looking to summarise existing knowledge, identify gaps, or analyse specific
data. Meta-analysis is associated with deductive research approach. Structuring the literature review
In a PhD thesis, the literature review typically comprises one chapter (perhaps 8-10,000 words), for a
Masters dissertation it may be around 2-3,000 words, and for an undergraduate dissertation it may
be no more than 2,000 words. You should search Google Scholar through the library's website when
off-campus. Further, the UCLA library created a chart to complement the article and for easy
comparison of those 14 types of reviews. As another methodological contribution, vom Brocke et al.
(2009) offered a series of guidelines for conducting literature reviews, with a particular focus on how
to search and extract the relevant body of knowledge. Take notes that you can later incorporate into
the text of your literature review.
Here are some examples: Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace the development of the
topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are
introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). Meta analyses are especially
valuable when the aim is to quantitatively measure the effect size or impact of a particular
intervention, treatment, or phenomenon. 4. Scoping Review Scoping reviews are invaluable tools,
especially for researchers in the early stages of exploring a topic. Kwon Y, Lemieux M, McTavish J,
Wathen N. (2015). Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches.
Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services. So, how do you turn a network of articles
into a cohesive review of the literature. However, with the progress in your academic career you will
learn these classifications and may need to use different types of them. This is probably a good time
to decide whether to go for a mini- or a full review. Though hybrid cars consume less fuel than
conventional cars, there is still an issue regarding. You need to have a sufficiently focused research
question to conduct a narrative literature review Systematic literature review requires more rigorous
and well-defined approach compared to most other types of literature review. You have some chance
to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended
opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. For
example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or
philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by
sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature. Mitigation measures concerning
land use include following aspects. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments
occurred. You need a resolution because, as readers, we would like to know what happened to the
characters. Some reviews declare that they have scanned the literature up to a certain point in time,
but given that peer review can be a rather lengthy process, a full search for newly appeared literature
at the revision stage may be worthwhile. At this stage, it’s common to feel a bit of writer’s block and
find yourself procrastinating under the pressure of finally having to put something on paper. Keep in
mind that UNC Libraries have research guides and to databases relevant to many fields of study.
Once that’s decided, you need to draw up an outline of your entire chapter in bullet point format.
Himmelfarb has SPSS on some 3rd floor computers, and GW affiliates may download SAS to your
own laptop from the Division of IT website. The pool of writers on this platform encompasses
experts in every literature review type. Your professor will probably not expect you to read
everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first
limit scope of the research problem. Thus, the details in the study must be impartial. 4. Currency It's
also necessary to check the currency of the sources. When referring to the author’s name in a
sentence, you do not need to repeat it at the end of the sentence. Check for fluency, structure,
evidence, criticality and referencing, and don’t forget the basics of good grammar, punctuation and
spelling. These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr ) systems
including design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. However, if
you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. There
are five key steps to writing a literature review: Search for relevant literature Evaluate sources
Identify themes, debates, and gaps Outline the structure Write your literature review A good
literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes, and critically evaluates to
give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject. Instead, it focuses on the “methods” of
the researcher or writer. Sewa Samiti, a NGO working in Hazaribag district, constant contact with
dust pollution. The company ran into problems unrelated to the charging stations and is now looking
to sell its network of charging stations (Yonan).
When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread
thoroughly before submitting. Reproduced from Grant, M. J. and Booth, A. (2009), A typology of
reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. It can be helpful to make an
annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of
summary and analysis for each source. Re-running your well-executed search in the future Creating
search alerts based on a well-designed search, allowing you to stay notified of new research in your
area Tracking and remember all of the searches you have done. At its core, a concept map consists of
nodes, which represent individual concepts or ideas, and links, which depict the relationships
between these concepts. It goes beyond documentation and reflects decisions related to the selection
of the sources, the search terms used, the period of time covered, the articles selected in the search,
and the application of backward and forward searches ( vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). In short, the
rigour of any review article is reflected by the explicitness of its methods (i.e., transparency) and the
soundness of the approach used. This Example will help you be objective and take a transparent
approach. Argumentative: The purpose of an argumentative literature review is to select sources for
the purpose of supporting or refuting a specific claim. LibGuides: Literature Review: Examples of
dissertations You will find our postgraduate dissertations in our research repository USW Pure.
Many systematic reviews, but not all, use statistical methods to combine the results of independent
studies into a single quantitative estimate or summary effect size. There is no way to make sure all
the literature on a topic was considered. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up
to date with what is current in the field. Both authors independently reviewed each of the identified
articles to determine eligibility and extract study information. This is perhaps more common in
education or the social and hard sciences where published research often includes a methods section,
but it is sometimes appropriate for the digital humanities as well. Below are five essential criteria to
help you evaluate information from any resource: Evaluation Criteria 1. accuracy. The information
from the sources your students gathered must be error-free to ensure its reliability. Debates, conflicts
and contradictions: where do sources disagree. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current
state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic. A literature
review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an
annotated bibliography would be organized. You can also evaluate a computerized grading system in
a review of related literature to single out its advantages and barriers to implementation. Start with a
topic sentence linked to your literature review purpose. Evidence. Cite relevant information from
your chosen sources. The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying. Now, if you look at CNG
cars (which are essentially dual-fuel hybrids running on either petrol or. They can be finely controlled
and provide high torque from rest, unlike internal combustion. Consider Research Field Standards:
Different academic fields have established standards and preferences for different forms of literature
review. History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary
to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in
order. Again, you can use this to make an argument about gaps in the research. Goals of Literature
Reviews What are the goals of creating a Literature Review. At the earlier parts of the literature
review chapter, you need to specify the type of your literature review your chose and justify your
choice. Selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing risk of bias in a duplicate manner using two
independent reviewers to avoid random or systematic errors in the process.