Are you struggling with writing a literature review? You're not alone.

Crafting a comprehensive
literature review can be a daunting task, requiring meticulous research, critical analysis, and coherent
synthesis of existing scholarly works. It's a crucial component of any academic paper, thesis, or
dissertation, providing the foundation upon which your own research is built.

The difficulty lies in sifting through a vast sea of literature, identifying relevant sources, and
effectively summarizing and synthesizing the key findings and arguments. Moreover, it requires a
keen understanding of the topic at hand, as well as the ability to critically evaluate the quality and
credibility of various sources.

If you find yourself overwhelmed by the demands of writing a literature review, fear not. Help is at
hand. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional assistance from experienced writers who specialize in
crafting high-quality literature reviews. With their expertise and guidance, you can ensure that your
literature review meets the highest standards of academic rigor and excellence.

By entrusting your literature review to the experts at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save yourself time
and effort while also ensuring that your paper stands out for all the right reasons. So why struggle
alone when you can get professional help? Order your literature review today and take the first step
towards academic success.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds
to upgrade your browser. When you search for literature using quotation marks, the search becomes
more precise; you will only find articles where that exact phrase is used and miss articles that contain
variations on that phrase or a similar combination of search terms. That is, that you review the
citations and references for the included publications. CRD’s Guidance for those Carrying Out or
Commissioning Reviews. It is recommended that you use the same search terms, both as controlled
terms and as free-text terms. This study mapped what is currently known about software ecosystems
perspective. If you go over any of these limits, you will have to pay as you go. Help support the
objectives of: Project management Systems engineering Verification and validation Configuration
management Quality assurance. Select fields for each comparison below and click on Find
Duplicates under References and remove all duplicates. The results from analysis of Google Scholar
database describe the total number of primary studies that we are able to find using only Google
Scholar database. These may, or may not, be critical and can be used to support one side of an
argument as opposed to a critical evaluation of both sides of the argument. By scanning titles,
abstracts and subject headings, you may find additional, useful search terms. The qualitative results
discuss various strategies for systematic evaluation of the Grey literature during systematic literature
review. There are several different options for searching in Embase (via embase.com). In the search
example below, we show how you can structure the search in a similar way as in Medline Ovid. If
you do so, however, you risk missing material that may have been added retrospectively to the
database. Nowadays, everyone has wide access to scientific literature repositories, which comprise
of both “white” and “Grey” literature. Journal Systems and Software, Vol 70, Issues 1-2, 2004, pp
37-60. Method: A systematic mapping study was conducted using a pre-defined protocol. You can
then combine the different blocks with AND. PhD student (NIHR funded) Health Sciences
University of York. We conclude that Google Scholar can be a choice for retrieving published
studies however; it lacks detailed search options to target wider pool of articles. OSS process
through conducting a systematic literature review providing an. Journals also often demand that a
search be updated if several months have passed since the article was submitted. The quantitative
results comprise of charts and tables, showing the extent of Grey literature usage. At the library, we
often get questions about what exactly characterizes a systematic review, what differentiates it from
other kinds of literature reviews, and how one might best go about searching the literature
systematically. The more search blocks you have, the narrower your search will be; the narrower your
search, the greater your risk of excluding relevant articles. In EndNote, you can both organize your
references and get rid of duplicates. At the moment, KI does not have a license for these kinds of
programs. A few examples. Rewrite the words within a parenthesis and write AB in front of the
parenthesis. The search strategy should be documented in full for each database, and can be
published in an appendix to the published review article.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to easily retrieve a list containing all the references from several
different publications. Methods: The work consists of a systematic literature review of SLRs and is
a tertiary study and meta-analysis. The protocol can be registered, in PROSPERO for example, or in
another open repository, such as Open Science Framework or Figshare. To reduce risk for bias, it is
also recommended that at least two people, independent of one another, review all found articles
and choose which studies to include in the review. How to use the evidence: assessment and
application of scientific evidence. There are many different kinds of reviews, and the kind that will
suit you best will depend on a variety of factors, for instance, how much time you have, as well as
what kind of research question you’re working with. You can also find out which search terms were
used to index your key articles. When you include the subject heading in your search you will find
articles about a subject even if the authors of the article have chosen other, adjacent words to
describe the article themselves. Note that you would only rarely use all parts of the PICO-question in
a search; most of the time, you will focus on population and intervention. Journals also often demand
that a search be updated if several months have passed since the article was submitted. The search
strategy should be documented in full for each database, and can be published in an appendix to the
published review article. When you search for literature using quotation marks, the search becomes
more precise; you will only find articles where that exact phrase is used and miss articles that contain
variations on that phrase or a similar combination of search terms. Systematic reviews sometimes
contain so-called meta-analyses, wherein the collected data is combined using statistical methods.
Help support the objectives of: Project management Systems engineering Verification and validation
Configuration management Quality assurance. In systematic literature searching, a precision of two-
three percent is common. A wide search means that not all search results will be relevant. Magne
Jorgensen. A Review of Studies on Expert Estimation of Software Development Effort. These look a
little different depending on which database you’re using. The percentage of Grey literature sources
used in information synthesis sections of SLRs is around 93.2%. We were able to retrieve around 96
% of primary studies using Google Scholar database. Using the state of the art non-commercial
databases that index information, the researchers can make the rigorous process of searching
empirical studies in SLRs easier. You may also want to use a program that can help you screen your
references, such as Rayyan. Put the free text words within a parenthesis and write TI in front of the
parenthesis. In clinical research, it is common to use the PICO-structure: P opulation, I ntervention, C
ontrol and O utcome. Inspired from properties by natural and business ecosystems, a software
ecosystem covers technical and business aspects of software development as well as partnership
among companies. Cochrane Reviewers’ Handbook. Version 4.2.1. December 2003. Glass, R.L.,
Vessey, I., Ramesh, V. Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature. The search
terms within each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND. Here we’ll
review how you can do so in Web of Science and in SpiderCite, which builds on data from Lens.org.
The more search blocks you have, the narrower your search will be; the narrower your search, the
greater your risk of excluding relevant articles. Systematic reviews usually rate at the top of evidence
hierarchy since they analyze and evaluate results from all available, original research articles that
answers a specific research question. There are several different frameworks available that might be
able to help you structure and delimit your research question.
These may, or may not, be critical and can be used to support one side of an argument as opposed to
a critical evaluation of both sides of the argument. As a student you should rather do a structured
literature review, including only certain aspects of the methodology described on this page. You can
download the paper by clicking the button above. Depending on the topic, you may want to
supplement your search with a multi-disciplinary database like Web of Science, or subject-specific
databases, such as CINAHL, PsycInfo or ERIC. Keep in mind that it may not always be possible to
alter your strategy to such an extent that all your key articles are found without your results
becoming too comprehensive. It is also easier to structure comprehensive and advanced search
strategies, and to edit search strategies. We conclude that software ecosystems research is
concentrated in 8 main areas in which the most relevant are open source software, ecosystem
modeling, and business issues. In EndNote, you can both organize your references and get rid of
duplicates. Using the state of the art non-commercial databases that index information, the
researchers can make the rigorous process of searching empirical studies in SLRs easier. How to
review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature, 2000. Cochrane
Reviewers’ Handbook. Version 4.2.1. December 2003. Glass, R.L., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V. Research
in software engineering: an analysis of the literature. A large number of software engineering
researchers are undertaking systematic literature reviews (SLRs) to investigate empirical evidence in
software engineering. For instance, you can search for the articles using titles, but you can also do so
using PMID-nr or DOI-nr. If you go over any of these limits, you will have to pay as you go. The
“Grey” literature, as opposed to “white” literature, is non-peer reviewed scientific information that is
not available using commercial information sources such as IEEE or ACM. BPMN notation. As a
result, we systematically analysed 33 studies presenting an. IBSN 186-4960329. Australian National
Health and Medical Research Council. A variety of tools and databases allow you to search for
citation data, including Web of Science, Google Scholar and SpiderCite. Barbara Kitchenham.
Agenda. The evidence-based paradigm Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE) Systematic
Reviews. The systematic literature review was conducted on 138 SLRs’ published through 2003 until
2012 (June). OSS process through conducting a systematic literature review providing an. If you
search without quotation marks, the terms are not kept together as a phrase. Find additional
examples of useful tools at Systematic Review Toolbox. It is recommended that you use the same
search terms, both as controlled terms and as free-text terms. Four digital databases were searched
for research literature and primary studies were selected after a three round selection process
conducted by multiple researchers. A safer way is to delimit your search to the dates when articles
were last added to the database, or use EndNote to deduplicate your new references. They must
engage in a new perspective considering both their own business and third party ones. Conduct a
search in PROSPERO, for example, to ensure that there are no ongoing projects that resemble yours.
Results: For each of the selected article sources such as ACM, IEEEXplore, Springer-link and
Science Direct, we have presented results, which describe the extent of the usage of Grey literature.
To reduce risk for bias, it is also recommended that at least two people, independent of one another,
review all found articles and choose which studies to include in the review.
They must engage in a new perspective considering both their own business and third party ones.
When you include the subject heading in your search you will find articles about a subject even if the
authors of the article have chosen other, adjacent words to describe the article themselves. This
might include handsearching selected journals, or doing a citation analysis. The following checklist
may be helpful during this review: Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Method: A
systematic mapping study was conducted using a pre-defined protocol. There are many different
kinds of reviews, and the kind that will suit you best will depend on a variety of factors, for
instance, how much time you have, as well as what kind of research question you’re working with.
The information is only used to contact the person using the form. The percentage of Grey literature
sources used in information synthesis sections of SLRs is around 93.2%. We were able to retrieve
around 96 % of primary studies using Google Scholar database. The importance of using a
systematic approach to addressing these concerns throughout the software development life cycle is
growing as more and more systems are employed to handle critical tasks. Sometimes grey literature,
such as dissertations or clinical trials, is included in the search as well. To see which publications that
have cited these articles, click on Citation Report, which you’ll find on the right side of the search
box. If that’s your result, then you’ve retrieved all your key articles. You can also find out which
search terms were used to index your key articles. Help support the objectives of: Project
management Systems engineering Verification and validation Configuration management Quality
assurance. It is also easier to structure comprehensive and advanced search strategies, and to edit
search strategies. Other tools can help you translate the search syntax used in different databases, for
example, Systematic Review Accelerator Polyglot. Help support the objectives of: Project
management Systems engineering Verification and validation Configuration management Quality
assurance. Apart from field-specific knowledge and awareness of research methodology, you may
need people in your team who are experts in statistical analysis and literature searches. International
supplier of IT -systems, products, and consultancy services. We also conclude that Grey literature is
widely available in this age of information. Narrower controlled terms can also be included as free-
text terms. In the picture below you can see how the different search strategies compare to one
another. Journals also often demand that a search be updated if several months have passed since the
article was submitted. When you search for literature using quotation marks, the search becomes
more precise; you will only find articles where that exact phrase is used and miss articles that contain
variations on that phrase or a similar combination of search terms. In this paper, we undertake a
systematic mapping study to present a wide review of primary studies on software ecosystems.
Systematic mapping is a methodology that gives, after a systematic research process, a visual
summary map of its results. The “Grey” literature, as opposed to “white” literature, is non-peer
reviewed scientific information that is not available using commercial information sources such as
IEEE or ACM. PRISMA 2020 consists of a checklist with 27 points and several flowcharts. Critical
Comments on the Standish Group’s CHAOS Reports,, 2004. The results are also analyzed against
our research goals. To find government reports or similar texts, you may even have to go to the
organization’s website and search directly among their publication lists.
IST 44, 2002, pp491-506 Magne Jorgensen and Kjetil Molokken. We conclude that Google Scholar
can be a choice for retrieving published studies however; it lacks detailed search options to target
wider pool of articles. Search filters are sets of search terms chosen to restrict a search to a selection
of references, such as articles based on method or study type. A variety of tools and databases allow
you to search for citation data, including Web of Science, Google Scholar and SpiderCite. Magne
Jorgensen. A Review of Studies on Expert Estimation of Software Development Effort. Select “ OR
” between each row and add more rows if needed. Journal Systems and Software, Vol 70, Issues 1-2,
2004, pp 37-60. In EndNote, you can both organize your references and get rid of duplicates. To find
government reports or similar texts, you may even have to go to the organization’s website and
search directly among their publication lists. PhD student (NIHR funded) Health Sciences University
of York. Conduct a search in PROSPERO, for example, to ensure that there are no ongoing projects
that resemble yours. The search should have high sensitivity, that is, it should be created in such a
way that the search will retrieve all relevant articles within a research area, or at least discover as
many as possible. Here, you can use search filters to delimit your search to clinical trials, for instance,
or studies about Covid-19. Can a search term be added that might include this key article. CRD
Report Number 4 (2nd Edition), NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York,
IBSN 1 900640 20 1, March 2001. Help support the objectives of: Project management Systems
engineering Verification and validation Configuration management Quality assurance. If you use
truncation, the automatic mapping won’t work. I agree that my (optional) personal data (name, e-
mail) is stored in accordance with the Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Conclusion: From the
analysis of 138 Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs’), we conclude that the evidence of Grey
literature in SLRs is around 9%. It’s often a good idea to start with a test search where you use the
subject headings and synonyms you’re already familiar with. Critical Comments on the Standish
Group’s CHAOS Reports,, 2004. BPMN notation. As a result, we systematically analysed 33 studies
presenting an. There are also international guidelines that detail how systematic reviews should be
reported, the Prisma Guidelines. Methods: The work consists of a systematic literature review of
SLRs and is a tertiary study and meta-analysis. Journals also often demand that a search be updated
if several months have passed since the article was submitted. They are often collaborative and tag,
for instance, inclusion- and exclusion criteria. Results: For each of the selected article sources such
as ACM, IEEEXplore, Springer-link and Science Direct, we have presented results, which describe
the extent of the usage of Grey literature. The following checklist may be helpful during this review:
Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Other tools can help you translate the search syntax
used in different databases, for example, Systematic Review Accelerator Polyglot. You will use these
to create search blocks that will then form the basis for the search strings used in the different
databases.
Find additional examples of useful tools at Systematic Review Toolbox. The search terms within
each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with AND. Here, you can use
search filters to delimit your search to clinical trials, for instance, or studies about Covid-19. Often
you will need to use a modified and simplified search strategy to search for grey material. In contrast
to a wide search, a narrow (or precise ) search will result in a larger share of relevant hits, but you
also run the risk of missing relevant studies. Brenda Thomas Information Specialist Cochrane Stroke
Group. The method exists in an unpublished and relative simple version presented here. In clinical
research, it is common to use the PICO-structure: P opulation, I ntervention, C ontrol and O utcome.
It’s often a good idea to start with a test search where you use the subject headings and synonyms
you’re already familiar with. As a student you should rather do a structured literature review,
including only certain aspects of the methodology described on this page. Objective: The goal of this
study is to provide an overview of addressing concerns across the software development life cycle.
Help support the objectives of: Project management Systems engineering Verification and validation
Configuration management Quality assurance. CRD’s Guidance for those Carrying Out or
Commissioning Reviews. IBSN 186-4960329. Australian National Health and Medical Research
Council. You can then export the references from the list to EndNote or another reference
management program. This is usually referred to as a free-text search. The University of Plymouth
Library has a good website where you can read more about the most commonly used frameworks.
Note that you would only rarely use all parts of the PICO-question in a search; most of the time, you
will focus on population and intervention. A large number of software engineering researchers are
undertaking systematic literature reviews (SLRs) to investigate empirical evidence in software
engineering. The protocol can be registered, in PROSPERO for example, or in another open
repository, such as Open Science Framework or Figshare. The search procedure identified 1026
studies, of which 44 were identified as relevant to answer our research questions. PRISMA 2020
consists of a checklist with 27 points and several flowcharts. Sometimes grey literature, such as
dissertations or clinical trials, is included in the search as well. OSS development macro process
represented by BPMN notation with a detailed. There are also international guidelines that detail
how systematic reviews should be reported, the Prisma Guidelines. These may, or may not, be
critical and can be used to support one side of an argument as opposed to a critical evaluation of
both sides of the argument. You will use these to create search blocks that will then form the basis for
the search strings used in the different databases. A safer way is to delimit your search to the dates
when articles were last added to the database, or use EndNote to deduplicate your new references.
To see which publications that have cited these articles, click on Citation Report, which you’ll find
on the right side of the search box.