Title: Unlocking the Essence: The Main Aim of Literature Review

In the realm of academic pursuit, literature review stands as a cornerstone, a pivotal element that
underpins the edifice of scholarly inquiry. Its significance reverberates across disciplines, serving as a
compass guiding researchers through the labyrinth of existing knowledge towards the discovery of
new insights and the formulation of novel hypotheses. Understanding the main aim of literature
review is akin to unraveling the mysteries of scholarly discourse itself.

At its core, the main aim of a literature review is to meticulously survey, synthesize, and evaluate
existing literature pertinent to a particular topic or research question. It serves as a comprehensive
exploration of the scholarly landscape, providing a panoramic view of theories, methodologies,
findings, and gaps in knowledge. Through a systematic examination of relevant literature,
researchers can contextualize their own work within the broader academic discourse, identify areas of
consensus and contention, and delineate the trajectory of their inquiry.

However, embarking on the journey of crafting a literature review is not without its challenges. It
demands more than mere compilation or summary; it requires critical analysis, discernment, and the
ability to discern patterns amidst the vast expanse of scholarly works. Crafting a literature review
entails navigating through a labyrinth of publications, deciphering complex theories, and synthesizing
diverse perspectives into a cohesive narrative.

Indeed, the process can be daunting, especially for those new to academic writing or grappling with
the intricacies of their research topic. Time constraints, the sheer volume of literature, and the
pressure to produce original insights can further compound the challenge, leaving many researchers
feeling overwhelmed and uncertain.

Amidst these challenges, seeking expert assistance can prove invaluable. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers
a lifeline to those navigating the intricate terrain of literature review writing. With a team of
seasoned professionals well-versed in diverse academic fields, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides
bespoke literature review services tailored to meet the unique needs of each client. From conducting
comprehensive literature searches to synthesizing complex ideas, their expert writers ensure that
every literature review reflects scholarly rigor, clarity, and originality.

In conclusion, the main aim of a literature review transcends mere summary or compilation; it serves
as a gateway to scholarly inquiry, illuminating the path towards new discoveries and insights. While
the journey may be arduous, the rewards are boundless. And with the assistance of ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔, navigating the labyrinth of literature review writing becomes not only manageable but
transformative.
Therefore, the Aims and Objectives should be around page 2, 3, or 4. These authors review gender
in accounting research and identify “two persistent pitfalls” (p. 385) in this literature, and thus,
portray large parts of it as inadequate. They often require “playing around” with theories and the
construction of the review sample as well as discussing the potential contributions of a literature
review at conferences and through other avenues. For instance, is a wide perspective sufficient to
give an overview of the scholarly discussion on your topic, or do you need to focus on complex
details of small sections of your topic. This may necessitate a close examination of the citation.
Delete Replies Reply Reply Unknown 3 December 2017 at 05:18 Wow,great post. We should be
aware of most common difficulties that arise during the writing process of a literature review.
Finally, I discussed examples of how original contributions to the literature can be rendered from
literature reviews of qualitative accounting research. Literature Review For a person doing a
literature review this would include tasks such as recognition, retrieval and recollection of the
relevant literature. Finally, besides the above-mentioned problems, regarding research design, there
are two common problems encountered especially by students who want to do qualitative study;
sometimes researchers and research team try to identify everything, even the sample size, in advance
when they design their study because they have a strong background of quantitative research, and
this is completely in contrast with the flexible nature and explorative approach of qualitative
research. Retrieved 4th September 2009 from the World Wide Web. Keep your review focused on
your topic: As you take notes, record which specific aspects of the article you are reading are
relevant thesis statement for ccot essay your topic as you read you will come up with key descriptors
that you can record in your notes that will help you organize your findings when you come to write
up your review. Zero in on the research that relates to your project. According to Caulley (1992) a
good literature review should do the following. For new qualitative researchers, it often seems that
the researcher should totally concentrate on the dual process of data collection and data analysis. In
turn, other reviews have been less concerned with specific accounting phenomena and more
interested in the application of a certain method theory to accounting research. Such extensive
descriptions in qualitative accounting research come with the challenge that several elements or
aspects of their findings might be extracted and included in a literature review. So, when you’re
piecing your literature review together, remember to pay homage to the classics, even if only briefly.
According to the editors and reviewers, several important and well-cited articles were missing from
this sample owing to the restrictions of my keyword search. Likewise, Mahama and Khalifa (2017, p.
324) argue that for qualitative accounting research based on interviews, the literature review forms
the basis of deriving interview questions and later “determining whether new knowledge is generated
from the interview data, thereby paving the way for the researcher to claim empirical contribution”.
This is the situation when you are asked to investigate the existing state of research on your issue and
then analyze and synthesize your results. Depending on the review type, the review process may
vary. This is a costly mistake, as it always results in extensive rewriting, which takes a lot longer than
just doing it one step at a time. These gaps then form the foundation for your proposed study. Above
all, we want to be entertained, and our attention spans are far from perfect. In other words, writing a
literature review research paper acknowledges what others have done on a subject, showing your
readers that your study was well-conceived. Briefly state specific findings listed in an article. You
can use their samples to improve your literature review or order a custom one. To learn how to
paraphrase texts from previous studies.
Hence, there is often no clear-cut or objective criterion of whether a research item should be
included in or excluded from a review sample. Just as the short history of this published review
paper ( Ndemewah and Hiebl, 2022 ) shows, the final literature review (e.g. as published in a
standalone paper or PhD thesis) may differ significantly from earlier versions. This article is a
quantitative research that aimed at examining the correlation between symptoms and stress in 40
adolescents suffering from schizophrenia. Healthcare professionals have embraced medical
technologies and other interventions to address this issue; an aspect that has reduce neonatal and
childhood mortality rate and increased survival of premature infants. We call on review authors to
conduct more rigorous reviews, on editors and peer-reviewers to gate-keep more strictly, and the
community of methodologists to better support the broader research community. More discussion
and debates are necessary before selecting and justifying an approach. Such reviews may be
specifically helpful and impactful if researchers have seen relatively new methods or noticed
shortcomings or open questions with existing research methods applied in qualitative accounting
research. This involves reading the major published work (both printed and online work) in a chosen
research area and reviewing and critically evaluating them. Seeking feedback from the qualitative
accounting research community not only pertains to the last strategy for teasing out contributions
from literature reviews but also relates to reviews of qualitative accounting research generally.
Holland, Tara, and Rawayda Abdou. “Academic writing challenges. However, given the growing
prevalence of the “an A is an A” mentality in business schools ( Aguinis et al., 2020 ) and perceived
need to produce A-level journal “hits” to gain tenure ( Alvesson et al., 2017 ), such action may not
be advisable to junior accounting researchers interested in literature reviews of qualitative accounting
research. Another potential benefit of this theory-led approach is that an alternative theory may be
suggested, and the current state of the field may be portrayed as inadequate or even
incommensurate, as detailed in Section 2. These gaps then form the foundation for your proposed
study. Recharge Your Resume and Boost Your Chances Fresh Grads. By contrast, all the examples
of use case (ii) reviews noted above ( Damayanthi and Gooneratne, 2017; Englund et al., 2011;
Englund and Gerdin, 2014; Modell, 2022a, 2022b ) are (co-)authored by senior scholars. Role of
Literature Review - Thai Bui Mentors and research colleagues can foster an environment of
thoughtful discussion and reflection, in part, by recommending readings such as those included on
this website. A literature review should show the researcher’s awareness and insight of contrasting
arguments, theories, and approaches. If the sentence is awkward, adjust the punctuation and
grammar to better integrate the material. However, this example illustrates the kinds of observations
that can emerge from a cross-reading of all the research items in a review sample that would not
emerge from just knowing the individual results of each item. Qualitative researchers pursue a
holistic and exclusive perspective. What flaws do you believe should be addressed in your paper.
Traditionally, literature reviews published in accounting journals, but also those in other social science
disciplines, have often been opaque in terms of the second and third steps; they only motivated a
topic and reported their findings. Meta-analysis ?Quantitatively combines the results of studies that
are. A good literature review sample should be well-organized and clearly written, with a clear
introduction that explains the purpose of the review and the research question being addressed.
However, if there are some points that need clarification or are missing from the overall context, they
should be mentioned. Since this engagement with the existing literature lies at the heart of most
literature reviews, I include their findings when discussing the potential advantages of literature
reviews. In the case of a literature review, you are the creating a new forest, which you will build by
using the trees you educational in the literature you read. This structure can (and likely will) evolve
as you write, but you need some sort of outline as a starting point. Reply Delete Replies Reply
Unknown 5 February 2018 at 06:50 Wow, great post. They conclude that most prior studies in this
field have exclusively contributed to the domain of management accounting research, with only a
small fraction contributing to actor network theory more generally.
Our unique professional editing service packages and educational resources have helped over
151,000 authors across 161 countries to get published in high-impact factor journals as well as
understand best publication practices. Using student-created research has a number of drawbacks: 1)
they are frequently unpublished and only available through interlibrary loan; 2) the student
conducting the research may not be a seasoned researcher. Purpose: It serves to provide a
comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge within a particular field. Dr. Mark
Matthews Student Learning Development Finding your way in the woods. All too often, we
encounter literature reviews that, at first glance, look pretty good. Even Though, to write a literature
review on anything, like academic, law, policy or other accomplishments of life have continued a
Phenomenal task for the fact that unlike other writing for other purposes, literature review requires
systematic and systematised idea, procedure, organisation and carrying into practice to rational and
impartial conclusion. I mention this “well-read scholar” aphorism to pinpoint that to create an original
contribution with a review article, the author must tease out something that cannot be read from all
the individual research items but that only emerges from a thorough cross-reading and analysis of the
entire review sample. Thus, a qualitative research question can be broadly, rather than narrowly,
focused in the beginning. Here are some tips to help you create an impressive review for your
research paper. Research questions should be derived from the literature. How will you limit
important components that comprise your topic (Figure C.1) and how much detail will you devote to
each of these aspects (Figure C.2). Holding degrees in more than 50 subjects, they know how to
create masterpieces. This structure can (and likely will) evolve as you write, but you need some sort
of outline as a starting point. Thus, junior scholars sometimes focus more on the technicalities of
reviews and less on what we can learn from the analysis of the review sample. The majority of health
researchers face many loopholes in justification. It helps to identify the topic which is related to the
field and also determined the gap of the research and problem identification. More of it, you should
pay attention to the most common challenges inherent to a literature review writing process. The lit
review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature i. Below are the general
guidelines on which this part is usually based. It offers insights into the practical difficulties
encountered when performing qualitative studies and offers solutions and alternatives applied by
these authors, which may be of use to others. The qualitative research is based on the theoretical and
philosophical assumptions that researchers try to understand. Possible solution: The first and the most
obvious one is to start using the Google Scholar search. Those who will read this example of
literature review will understand in which way they should move to continue investigating the topic.
For new qualitative researchers, it often seems that the researcher should totally concentrate on the
dual process of data collection and data analysis. Nonetheless, thanks to many supportive editors
and reviewers, I think that I have a better understanding now than some years ago. While most
experienced qualitative accounting researchers may be aware of the latter benefits of theory-led use
case (i) reviews, few, in my experience, are open to more inductive, evidence-based reviews of a
certain domain of accounting research. Lukka and Vinnari (2014) further note that a “method theory
offers a vocabulary and syntax, often also substantive propositions, which are, at least with
adaptations, applicable to another disciplinary domain” (p. 1312), such as accounting research.
Sometimes lack of planning and inadequate attention paid to the properness of the selected approach
considering the purpose of research will be problematic. Recognizing the constraints that researchers
can sometimes feel when attempting to plan, conduct and publish rigorous and comprehensive
evidence syntheses, we aim here to identify major pitfalls in the conduct and reporting of systematic
reviews, making use of recent examples from across the field. I concede that this position may come
across as overly instrumental and as blindly submitting to the rules of the current publish-or-perish
culture ( Becker and Lukka, 2022; van Dalen and Henkens, 2012; Weigel and Muller, 2020 ).
In simple words, what key points will be added to the body part. So, as you develop your catalogue
of literature, remember to incorporate both the classics and the more up to date research. Journalists
aren’t usually scholars, which means they aren’t specialists on the topics they write about; hence
newspaper stories aren’t scholarly sources. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS-
APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. The introduction states the scope of your literature
review, includes your thesis, gives your objective, tells readers how the review is organized, and
situates your work in the existing scholarly conversation. As some of the aforementioned examples
show ( Damayanthi and Gooneratne, 2017; Feldermann and Hiebl, 2020 ), junior researchers can still
collaborate with more experienced researchers to conduct impactful reviews according to the latter
two use cases. Recap: 7 Literature Review Mistakes We’ve covered a lot of ground in this post.
Even Though, to write a literature review on anything, like academic, law, policy or other
accomplishments of life have continued a Phenomenal task for the fact that unlike other writing for
other purposes, literature review requires systematic and systematised idea, procedure, organisation
and carrying into practice to rational and impartial conclusion. A related opportunity for qualitatively
oriented accounting scholars may lie in the richness and depth of the explanations provided in many
published research articles. They contrast a domain theory with a method theory, the latter being
defined as “a meta-level conceptual system, or theoretical lens, which originates from another field
such as organization studies or sociology” ( Lukka and Vinnari, 2014, p. 1312) and is more related to
the second use case of a literature review sketched above. Embracing E-Learning: The Digital
Footprints of University Students (Borneo E. Adopting a 'critical friend' role in supporting would-be
systematic reviews and avoiding individual responses to police use of the 'systematic review' label,
we go on to identify methodological solutions to mitigate these pitfalls. The proper sequence allows
moving from one question to another, avoiding chaos in writing. E.g., a body part in the standard
literature review samples often is organized chronologically, moving from the older findings to the
newest research. However, this example illustrates the kinds of observations that can emerge from a
cross-reading of all the research items in a review sample that would not emerge from just knowing
the individual results of each item. An introduction basically introduces the text to the readers. The
result of such a study will not be new and interesting, and even the study process will be very
mechanical without good interpretation or enough exploration. Of course, you don’t want to burn
precious word count providing an in-depth history lesson regarding the evolution of the topic (unless
that’s one of your research aims, of course), but you should at least acknowledge any key differences
between the old and the new. That said, you may be asked to draft a lit review research paper as a
standalone project. Embracing E-Learning: The Digital Footprints of University Students (Borneo E.
You can use their samples to improve your literature review or order a custom one. Similar to use
case (ii) reviews, these use case (iii) reviews usually focus solely on the accounting literature and
typically only include research published in accounting journals in their review samples. Therefore, it
acquires significance by the very fact that it provides brief, but nevertheless, important information
on the research topic that allows the reader to decide if the topic is relevant, researchable, and a
remarkable issue. After that, there is an option to highlight the key points and give recommendations
for future studies or research. Identifying Gaps: Aims to pinpoint areas where there is a lack of
research or unresolved questions, highlighting opportunities for further investigation. Depending on
your topic of study, their published findings can be a valuable source of knowledge. Just as with
other methodological choices, the authors of literature reviews are free to frame their central
research questions more narrowly or widely, and thus, have discretion about what should be included
in or excluded from the review sample ( Hiebl, 2021 ). Possible solution: When choosing sources, it
is recommended, first of all, to rely on some more extensive fundamental source in which the
selected topic is considered, and move further in the direction from general to particular — from
necessary provisions to more specific ones. Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences 5th
Edition Gravetter Solutions. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. “The systematic identification,
location, scrutiny and summary of written materials that pertain to a research problem”. However,
less experienced researchers need not necessarily shy away from use cases (ii) and (iii).
Other than the sources’ age, consider such elements as relevance and authoritativeness. However,
before you begin writing, you must evaluate your reference list to ensure that it is up to date and has
reported the most current work. Why qualitative research in the health professions. He specializes in
qualitative and quantitative research designs and methods, multimethod research. Outline. The
research topic. These are useful, particularly for current information. Your contribution is to organize
the concepts from the sources into a coherent argument or narrative that incorporates your views.
Announcement: Today’s class location has been rescheduled to TEC 112 Next Week: Bring four
questions (15 copies) to share with your classmates. In other words, writing a literature review
research paper acknowledges what others have done on a subject, showing your readers that your
study was well-conceived. You can also consider the disciplines and routes for future research here
and blind spots and missing elements in existing knowledge. This figure does not intend to provide a
step-by-step guide of how to perform a literature review of qualitative accounting research. Hence,
the mere synthesis of the individual findings brings a few fresh insights. Bolin TD, Wong S, Ult GC,
Crouch R, Engelman JL and Riordan SM. We are top specialists ready to help with your project.
Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them Traditional approaches to reviewing
literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect decisions. Do you have some idea how
you will study your topic. Our writers are fast and reliable, so you’ll get your paper on time. The
following are the key steps as outlined by Galvan In the case of this Educ introductory literature
review, your initial purpose is to provide an overview of the topic that is of interest to you,
demonstrating your understanding of key works and concepts within your chosen area of focus. In
summary, a good literature review sample is a well-organized, clearly written, and evidence-based
overview of the existing research on a particular topic. Also, because textbooks are designed for
teaching rather than research, they are unlikely to be effective in your Lit Review. The author chart
three typical advantages and three typical use cases of literature reviews of qualitative accounting
research, as well as the typical process steps and outputs of such reviews. I acknowledge that several
further articles in the accounting literature include valuable advice for qualitatively oriented
researchers (e.g. Ahrens, 2022; Ahrens and Chapman, 2006; Bruesch and Quinn, 2022; Lillis and
Mundy, 2005; Grafton et al., 2011; Qu and Dumay, 2011 ). This can be arranged in various ways
(e.g. thematically, chronologically or methodologically). I will advice my colleague students more
especially first time thesis writers to make good use of this course. A collection of all the scholarly
writings on a topic A systematic method for identifying, evaluating and interpreting the work
produced by researchers. This allows you to organize your thoughts and discoveries into a logical
totality. Ideally, your literature review should be built on a strong base of journal articles, ideally
from well-recognised, peer-reviewed journals with a high H index. Likewise, Mahama and Khalifa
(2017, p. 324) argue that for qualitative accounting research based on interviews, the literature
review forms the basis of deriving interview questions and later “determining whether new
knowledge is generated from the interview data, thereby paving the way for the researcher to claim
empirical contribution”. I t usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and
synthesis. The method has been widely adapted into other fields, including environment (the
Collaboration for Environmental Evidence ) and social policy (the Campbell Collaboration ). To have
even better results don’t wait till you need to write a literature review and sign up for several
relevant scientific newsletters.