100% found this document useful (2 votes)
64 views

How To Write A Literature Review Part 2

The document discusses the challenges of writing a literature review, including sorting through numerous sources, synthesizing information into a coherent narrative, and maintaining objectivity. It also notes the importance of critical analysis, clear writing and organization. Additionally, it offers help from a service that provides professional assistance with literature reviews to ensure the work is thorough, well-researched and impeccably written.

Uploaded by

ea442225
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
64 views

How To Write A Literature Review Part 2

The document discusses the challenges of writing a literature review, including sorting through numerous sources, synthesizing information into a coherent narrative, and maintaining objectivity. It also notes the importance of critical analysis, clear writing and organization. Additionally, it offers help from a service that provides professional assistance with literature reviews to ensure the work is thorough, well-researched and impeccably written.

Uploaded by

ea442225
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Crafting a literature review can be a daunting task for many students and researchers.

It requires
extensive research, critical analysis, and the ability to synthesize information from various sources
into a cohesive narrative. Part 2 of our guide on "How To Write A Literature Review" delves deeper
into the intricacies of this process, offering valuable insights and practical tips to help you navigate
through the complexities.

One of the biggest challenges in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of information
available. Sorting through numerous articles, books, and other sources can be overwhelming,
especially when trying to identify relevant and credible sources for your review. Additionally,
synthesizing these sources into a coherent and well-structured narrative requires careful planning and
organization.

Another common difficulty faced by many writers is maintaining objectivity and avoiding bias in
their literature reviews. It's essential to critically evaluate each source and its findings, considering
factors such as methodology, sample size, and potential conflicts of interest. This critical analysis not
only strengthens the credibility of your review but also enhances your understanding of the research
topic.

Furthermore, the process of writing a literature review requires excellent writing skills and attention
to detail. It's essential to communicate your ideas clearly and concisely, while also adhering to the
formatting and style guidelines prescribed by your institution or publication. Striking the right
balance between summarizing existing research and offering your insights and interpretations can be
challenging but is crucial for creating a compelling literature review.

For those struggling with the complexities of writing a literature review, help is available. ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional assistance with literature reviews, ensuring that your work is
thorough, well-researched, and impeccably written. Our team of experienced writers specializes in
various disciplines and can help you navigate through the challenges of crafting a literature review
that meets the highest academic standards.

Whether you're a student working on a research project or a seasoned researcher looking to publish
your findings, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide the support you need to succeed. Order your
literature review today and take the first step towards academic excellence.
Whether y'all are an experienced researcher or a educatee, this article will come in handy. Systematic
Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories
or studies that changed the direction of the field. Chronology (this method will give the worst
impression, use only if it really makes sense to your topic!) (University of Wisconsin, 2006) MS 640:
Introduction to Biomedical Information 21. Then, investigate the trusted literature sources in
scholarly databases. Then decide what information is most relevant to the topic. Please let me know
if it meets your needs.” The submittal letter explains the context —the events that brought the report
about. Describe how these studies fail to fill the research gap. Literature Review Sample 1 Literature
Review Sample 2 Literature Review Sample 3 Have you written a stellar literature review you care
to share for teaching purposes. If you've been feeling stuck, this Sample Literary Research Essay
template can help you find inspiration and motivation. A review organized in this manner would
shift between time periods within each section according to the point being made. Use caution when
paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author’s
information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Questions for Further Research: What
questions about the field has the review sparked. Literature reviews are most often part of a larger
work, like a research article, but may also be written as their own piece to demonstrate a student's
understanding of a concept. Hordes of rubbish bury the decent articles you’d like to read. A
literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations, theses, and
research papers. Do you know how to develop your research design and methodology.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2005; 16:1. Kirkevold M. Integrative
nursing research — an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing
practice. Teams Enable groups of users to work together to streamline your digital publishing. By
statistically combining data from multiple studies, meta-analyses can create more precise and reliable
estimates of intervention effects than those derived from individual studies alone, when these are
examined independently as discrete sources of information. The key difference is that the Discussion
analyzes the information and displays what it all means for the reader, which is why the Discussion
commonly stands alone. However, if you are writing a review in the humanities, history, or social
sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be what is needed, because what is important is
how perspectives have changed through the years or within a certain time period. Essentially, this
section should only be one or two paragraphs in length. The integration of social media tools in
teaching and learning has been widely studied and. That is why we cannot but utilise the works of
other authors. For example, is it possible that your research may lead to a new policy, new theoretical
understanding, or a new method for analyzing data. It closes with a gesture of good will, expressing
hope that the reader finds the report satisfactory. However, in most cases, that is a bit like slamming
the phone down without saying good bye. Darlow and Wen (2015) provide a good example of a
highly structured narrative review in the eHealth field. Many student writers struggle to synthesize
because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some
strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show
your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
Anson, Chris M., and Robert A. Schwegler. 2010. The Longman Handbook for Writers and Readers,
6th ed. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101117. Lyons, K. (2005). UCSC library - how to
write a literature review. However, take care not to include your experimental methods here—that is
the job of the previous section. Their model follows the systematic data processing approach
comprised of three steps, namely: (a) literature search and screening; (b) data extraction and analysis;
and (c) writing the literature review. Keep in mind that UNC Libraries have research guides and to
databases relevant to many fields of study. This means that you will not just simply list your sources
and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. No. As you read widely but selectively in
your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your sources together. Many student
writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they
are citing; here are some strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the point of these
kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the
rest of your paper. For example, if your report is internal (written for your own supervisors), you may
spend less space on background information (they likely know about the situation or problem), or if
the report is solicited (you were asked for the report), you may not need as much emphasis on the
importance. Overall, you want to leave your reader feeling confident that you have what it takes to
get this research study completed in a timely fashion. The introduction should: define your topic and
provide an appropriate context for reviewing the literature; establish your reasons - i.e. point of view
- for. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. The type of
information you choose to mention should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is
thematic, methodological, or chronological. Methodological If you draw your sources from different
disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods, you might want to compare the results
and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. Instantly correct all language mistakes in
your text Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide As a piece of writing, the literature
review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you
are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). Strictly speaking, figures are illustrations, drawings,
photographs, graphs, and charts. Consider organization You’ve got a focus, and you’ve stated it
clearly and directly. Whether y'all are an experienced researcher or a educatee, this article will come
in handy. Then, investigate the trusted literature sources in scholarly databases. Readers use the list
of figures to quickly find the illustrations, diagrams, tables, and charts in your report. That’s good.
Now you must trade comprehensive note-taking for a different technique—one that supports your
skimming. NOTE: Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types.
Systematic reviews with discordant findings can cause great confusion and make it difficult for
decision-makers to interpret the review-level evidence ( Moher, 2013 ). Briefly, it contains this and
that, but does not cover this or that. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the
bibliography to find other relevant sources. The literature review gives you a chance to: Demonstrate
your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework and
methodology for your research Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists Show
how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate Evaluate the current state of research
and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic. I would like to ask how
to restore deleted files in my Google drive. See, the academic literature has a few defects—a few
flaws that make it a challenge to read. The content will look slightly different in each case, but the
process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. Share This Book Essay Guide Alex
Essay Writing Tool Dissertation Guide Ask The Elephant The structure of a literature review A
literature review should be structured like any other essay: it should have an introduction, a middle
or main body, and a conclusion. Adobe Express Go from Adobe Express creation to Issuu
publication.
Common software such as Microsoft Word, Excel, and Google Docs can create effective charts and
graphics for a report, while freeware such as Inkscape and Gimp are available online. The narrower
your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to get a good
survey of the material. After reading the introduction your reader should: Understand what it is you
want to do; Have a sense of your passion for the topic; Be excited about the study?s possible
outcomes. However, there are situations in which it is neither reasonable nor appropriate to pool
studies together using meta-analytic methods simply because there is extensive clinical heterogeneity
between the included studies or variation in measurement tools, comparisons, or outcomes of
interest. The Results will be directly related to your Method. This means drawing connections
between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. In many cases,
an abstract’s goal is to engage readers and help researchers and cataloguers determine whether your
work is a relevant source for their work and whether it’s a good fit for a specific collection or
academic journal. Think of this as if you used a yellow highlighter to mark the key sentences in the
report and then siphoned them all out onto a separate page and edited them for readability. A
disorganized or overly decorated cover page could lessen your credibility as a respectable writer.
Give examples: Cite studies that exhibit different aspects of the research gap. Avoid terms such as
seems, appears, means, looks as if, indicates, suggests, we believe, we think, and descriptor words
that indicate positive or negative results such as excellent, worse, better, great, etc. Naturally, the use
of tables, graphs, and figures is especially important here, as are explanations of how data were
derived. For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes,
key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and
economic access. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other academic texts, with an introduction,
a main body, and a conclusion. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as
you’re writing. The rigid format and objective style lend them a universal utility so readers from
various disciplines can readily access and use the complex information. It contains a briefing note on
literature review including definition, elements, strategies, and its types. For example, certain
countries, cities, cultures, etc. Four inclusion and three exclusion criteria were utilized during the
screening process. Hordes of rubbish bury the decent articles you’d like to read. Some people
construct a table of info to make it easier to organize their thoughts. For instance, the review might
examine whaling from pre-1600-1699, 1700-1799, and 1800-1899. An annotated bibliography is a
list of source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources.
Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for
example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).
How is the topic of your research proposal related to the problem. So I’ve learned to just put my
notes within the article; then everything’s in one place. It must be objective, unbiased, emotionless,
and free from judgment. At first glance, these sections may seem a bit overwhelming. The
bibliography or reference section of sources you’ve already read are also excellent entry points into
your own research. The following sections present these components in a suggested template for you
to follow in the preparation of your research proposal.
Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated
in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. Finding an example of a literature review is a
good idea to see what are you are going to create by yourself soon. Objectivity -- is the author's
perspective even-handed or prejudicial. Meta-analysis implies the deductive enquiry approach used.
For example, Some researchers think x causes y, others that x is only a moderating variable (Carroll,
2006) MS 640: Introduction to Biomedical Information 16. This lets you quickly browse your
literature review’s high points. A proper context for reviewing the literature should also be presented
in your introduction. Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive
information, make sure you're on a federal government site. Literature reviews serve as a guide to a
particular topic: professionals can use literature reviews to keep current on their field; scholars can
determine credibility of the writer in his or her field by analyzing the literature review. On the other
end of the spectrum, there might be a wealth of research regarding a certain topic within one country
(say the US), but very little research on that same topic in a different social context (say, China). For
example, you might discuss a scholarly article by stating “this paper argues...” or “in her work, the
author elaborates on...” However, there are cases where first person is appropriate in a literature
review, such as when you’re referencing your own research. The Conclusion should provide the exact
conclusions you have arrived at as they relate to your experimental objectives. A rigorous example of
one such review in the eHealth domain is presented by Mickan, Atherton, Roberts, Heneghan, and
Tilson (2014) on the use of handheld computers by healthcare professionals and their impact on
access to information and clinical decision-making. With an external report, you will need to not
only persuade the reader to accept your conclusions on the topic, but also establish credibility. You
may not necessarily include all the data you found on the topic, but you must include all relevant
data. Formulating research problems Prof. sp singh.ph d.course work.2020-21.citation index, journal
impact factor. Prof. sp singh.ph d.course work.2020-21.citation index, journal impact factor. For
example, if your report is internal (written for your own supervisors), you may spend less space on
background information (they likely know about the situation or problem), or if the report is solicited
(you were asked for the report), you may not need as much emphasis on the importance. Overall,
your list of citations should be a testament to the fact that you have done a sufficient level of
preliminary research to ensure that your project will complement, but not duplicate, previous research
efforts. Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction, a main
body, and a conclusion. Here are three reasons why I love using a note-taking template. The
following sections present these components in a suggested template for you to follow in the
preparation of your research proposal. There are many benefits to writing a literature review, from
improving your research skills to gaining a better understanding of the field you are studying. You
can combine the two lists under the heading, “List of Figures and Tables.”. The number of literature
is equivalent to the number of paragraphs. Are you aware of literature review models, types, and
elements. Headings are like the parts of an outline that have been pasted into the actual pages of the
document. Abandon that goal. Replace it with something the literature can more easily give you: use
the literature to advance your research project. Let’s be a bit more specific with this goal by looking
forward, to your project’s end—to your published journal article. Analysis: Involves critically
evaluating and summarizing key findings, methodologies, and debates found in. Use evidence In the
example above, the writers refer to several other sources when making their point.

You might also like