Writing a literature review for publication can be a daunting task.

It requires a thorough
understanding of the topic, a critical analysis of existing literature, and the ability to synthesize
information from various sources. Moreover, it demands a clear and coherent writing style that
effectively communicates the findings and insights to the readers.

One of the biggest challenges in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of information
available. It can be overwhelming to sift through numerous articles, books, and other sources to
identify relevant studies and arguments. Additionally, the literature on a given topic may be vast and
complex, making it difficult to distill key points and themes.

Another challenge is ensuring that the literature review is comprehensive and up-to-date. This
requires staying current with the latest research and incorporating recent findings into the review. It
also involves critically evaluating the quality and credibility of the sources, which can be time-
consuming and labor-intensive.

Furthermore, writing a literature review requires a high level of critical thinking and analytical skills.
It involves not only summarizing existing research but also evaluating its strengths and weaknesses,
identifying gaps in the literature, and proposing new directions for future research. This requires a
deep understanding of the topic and the ability to think critically about the evidence and arguments
presented in the literature.

In light of these challenges, many researchers and academics turn to professional writing services for
help with writing literature reviews. One such service is ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, which specializes in
academic writing and offers expert assistance with literature reviews and other types of academic
writing. Their team of experienced writers can help you navigate the complexities of writing a
literature review, ensuring that your review is comprehensive, up-to-date, and well-written.

In conclusion, writing a literature review for publication is a challenging task that requires a high
level of skill and expertise. It involves sifting through vast amounts of information, critically
evaluating sources, and synthesizing key points and themes. Professional writing services like ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide valuable assistance with this process, ensuring that your literature
review is of the highest quality and meets the standards of academic publishing.
A rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e014650. Gallan AS, Jarvis CB, Brown SW,
Bitner MJ. They can be one chapter of a doctoral dissertation. If you are writing a literature review
as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct
your search. We developed a comprehensive systematic literature search strategy based on the terms
used in the previous reviews to identify studies that looked explicitly at interventions designed to
turn research evidence into practice. Use caution when paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source
that is not your own, be sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your
own words. The authors conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases to identify eligible
reviews and subsequently used a validated instrument to conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. First,
here a wide variety of disciplines are on offer. You need to have an idea of what you will be
reviewing in order to effectively search for references and to write a coherent summary of the
research on it. Unlike a dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without
collecting original data. This section summarizes and synthesizes the literature that is relevant to the
research question or hypothesis. If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this
likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. It aims to provide a
comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. Use of concept
mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility
and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study.
The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence informed interventions in
allied healthcare: a systematic review. Like any other academic text, your literature review should
have an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion. Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a
subject area. Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read any landmark
studies and major theories in your field of research. For example, if you are reviewing literature
about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language
barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access. If you have the opportunity, discuss
your topic with your professor and your class mates. 2. Decide on the scope of your review How
many studies do you need to look at. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only
peer-reviewed articles and journals. As mentioned earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles
represent powerful information sources for eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-
the-art evidence. Before we get started on how to write the literature review chapter, we've got to
look at the why. Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings.
Contact Creative Savants team on their email and contact number for more details. Where plentiful
reviews already exist, a team may decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple
QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 ( table 2, item R6). Check out Scribbr’s professional
proofreading services. Provide the reader with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of
paragraphs, “signposts” throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points in
the review to aid in understanding comparisons and analyses. Further Readings Generative AI and
Writing USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A literature review surveys prior
research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue,
area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation
of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. This approach should only be
followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these
trends follow a clear chronological order of development. You can use a subheading for each theme,
time period, or methodological approach.
Nine practices associated with leading coproduction We identified nine processes that encompass
wide-ranging activities and interactions between individuals and groups with regard to leading the
coproduction of health and wellbeing. You can check out the literature review section of the blog
here. A safe place to reflect on the meaning of recovery: a recovery community co-productive
approach using multimedia interviewing technology. This sensitivity to motivation, context and
power is helpful for our understanding of leadership in coproduction. Do not use extensive quotes as
a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature. This process resulted in three
themes pertaining to coproduction leadership models and nine coproduction leadership practices.
Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies. The only
proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing - try for free. Help Center Here you'll
find an answer to your question. They noted that a wide selection of different healthcare
professionals and patients engaged with this type of social media and its global reach may be
significant for low- and middle-income countries. The approaches examined in this context were
characterized by distributed roles and responsibilities in which different individuals’ skills and
expertise were identified as best suited to the task at hand. This may include empirical studies or
conceptual papers that initiated a line of investigation, changed how problems or questions were
framed, introduced new methods or concepts, or engendered important debate ( Cooper, 1988 ). Use
the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. The
literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research question,
interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way. Correct my document today Writing literature
reviews can be quite challenging. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative
versus quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus
theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources
Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. When we write a
literature review we should always take into account certain details about the formatting, as they can
change depending on what style are we using. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social
Science Research Imagination. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018;3(2):48. Walsh M, Kittler MG, Mahal D.
This template can be used for a research paper at any level of study. The CQIMG endorses three
types of synthesis; thematic synthesis, framework synthesis and meta-ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44
Rapid QES favour descriptive thematic synthesis 45 or framework synthesis, 46 47 except when
theory generation (meta-ethnography 48 49 or analytical thematic synthesis) is a priority ( table 2,
item R17). Moving stroke rehabilitation evidence into practice: a systematic review of randomized
controlled trials. Designing a clear research question will save you much time in the long run so it
worth spending time initially to get it right. How to Write a Literature Review When writing a
literature review, it can be helpful to rely on the following steps. Our framework also has some
practical implications for coproduction leaders and participants. A review is personal - you're writing
a review to express your thoughts and feelings about a theatre show, not taking an exam. Keep
careful notes so that you may track your thought processes during the research process. Systematic
literature review: This is a rigorous and structured review that follows a pre-defined protocol to
identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. This means that
it’s crucial to know your keywords before starting any research paper project, especially when
looking for academic sources. Debra Mosek, University of Kentucky This text is a masterpiece,
carefully and thoughtfully crafted for both undergraduate and graduate students.
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied
by the author(s) and has not been edited for content. A distinction can be made between two types
of collective leadership. Coaching for recovery: a quality improvement project in mental healthcare.
This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has
cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. However, how opinion leaders had
an impact could not be determined because of insufficient details were provided, illustrating that
reporting specific details in published studies is important if diffusion of effective methods of
increasing evidence-based practice is to be spread across a system. This is an open access article
distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC
4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially,
and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited,
appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:.
Statistics from Altmetric.com Request permissions. Establishing trusting relationships Coproduction
is essentially relational and requires concerted efforts to establish trusting relationships and a sense of
commitment. Help readers understand your approach, describe the criteria used to select the sources
or the way in which you have presented information. Resources Dive into our extensive resources on
the topic that interests you. We include generic word count ranges for each section within the
template, but these are purely indicative. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the
number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. It takes into
account the context and complexities of real-world situations. Last, Bandara, Miskon, and Fielt
(2011) proposed a structured, predefined and tool-supported method to identify primary studies
within a feasible scope, extract relevant content from identified articles, synthesize and analyze the
findings, and effectively write and present the results of the literature review. However, many
authors have not made such a distinction, and the terms have frequently been used interchangeably.
Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not
specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor
by asking these questions: 1. Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare
professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Competing interests The
authors declare no competing interests. To present the concept you must review, the research you do
must be thorough. A review is personal - you're writing a review to express your thoughts and
feelings about a theatre show, not taking an exam. Chronological The simplest approach is to trace
the development of the topic over time. Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond evaluating
how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5. How to Write a Literature Review in 6
Steps So how do authors turn a network of articles into a coherent review of relevant literature. The
subsections might include how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and their
behaviors misunderstood. Suggestions for further research may be included, or if part of a larger
work, how the research reviewed relates to that covered in the new. Then, content is checked with
advanced plagiarism detection tools to ensure a 100% Turnitin pass. The critical evaluation of each
work should consider: Provenance -- what are the author's credentials. Look for recent publications,
reputable authors, and reliable sources of data and evidence. They reported that the use of social
media resulted in a significant improvement in knowledge and compliance with evidence-based
guidelines compared with more traditional methods. People and roles The way in which the
leadership of coproduction has been conceptualized in the literature suggests that a range of actors
are involved in the coproduction of health and wellbeing and that these actors can take on different
leadership roles and functions. The purpose of this descriptive or mapping review was to characterize
publication trends in the medical informatics literature over a 20-year period (1987 to 2006).
How will you further your research as a result of the review. Whether the search is comprehensive or
not, whether it involves a methodical approach for data extraction and synthesis or not, it is
important that the review documents in an explicit and transparent manner the steps and approach
that were used in the process of its development. Action research is a philosophy and methodology
of research generally applied in the social sciences. This guidance covers the review process as it
relates to synthesis of. A review team should identify where such shared mechanisms might operate.
28 An rQES team must also decide whether to use frameworks or models to focus the review.
Instead, it focuses on the “methods” of the researcher or writer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017..
Pantoja T, Grimshaw JM, Colomer N, et al. Adobe InDesign Design pixel-perfect content like flyers,
magazines and more with Adobe InDesign. An official website of the United States government
The.gov means it's official. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific
issues that can serve as the focus of your research. Therefore, to make the literature look appealing,
they need to know some of the methods that can help them improve their review. Systematic
Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Galvan, Jose L. Galvan Publication Name Writing
Literature Reviews: a Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Format Trade
Paperback Language English Features New Edition Publication Year 2017 Type Textbook Number
of Pages 288 Pages Dimensions Item Length 9.9in. Item Height 0.6in. Item Width 7in. Item Weight
20.8 Oz Additional Product Features Lc Classification Number H62.G246 2017 Edition Description
New Edition Edition Number 7 Reviews Excellent. The action you just performed triggered the
security solution. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your
intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to
obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. If you have limited time to conduct research,
literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. Doing a literature review:
Releasing the social science research imagination. Are multifaceted interventions more effective than
single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals’ behaviours. For instance, Levy
and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for conducting such reviews. Necessary skills
Literature review: An overview for students Defining the Scope Finding the Literature Developing a
Search Strategy Managing Your Research Writing the Review Systematic Reviews and Other
Review Types Useful Books Useful Videos Useful Links Commonly Used Terms. Try sorting
through some other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what
your discipline expects. It aims to provide practical recommendations for addressing a particular
problem or issue. We recommend not to base your research on studies that. Begin composing Once
you’ve settled on a general pattern of organization, you’re ready to write each section. Literature
reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular
topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the
topic. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. Conduct a
comprehensive search: Use databases and search engines to find relevant literature. All authors
revised and approved the final manuscript. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):4148. Cooke J, Langley J,
Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S. Just like any other document, a literature review consists of an
introduction, body, and the conclusion.
Steps in the Literature Review Process Define your research question Determine inclusion and
exclusion criteria Choose databases and search Review Results Synthesize Results Analyze Results
Librarian Support What is a Literature Review. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:212.. Article PubMed
PubMed Central Google Scholar Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L,
et al. Dealing with multiple stakeholders, which is inevitably required in coproduction, requires
addressing multiple perspectives in an attempt to bring them together. It is an objective, impartial
examination of the relevant evidence. Literature Review (RRL) Examples Because creating sample
literature reviews would take too long and not properly capture the nuances and detailed information
needed for a good review, we have included some links to different types of literature reviews
below. The procedure starts with searching for the relevant literature which should be highly
focused. When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the
research ( scholarship ) in a given field. John O'Kane, Roberts Wesleyan College Exceptional book-
-the only one in the field that actually helps students do the review and succeed at it. You must start
with a literature review outline and a will be helpful here. Writing Reviews of Academic Literature:
An Overview 2. There may be other places where people are publishing exemplary research. You can
argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to
create a framework for your research. By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of
cookies. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. We searched from January 2010 up
to June 2022 and applied no language restrictions. Additionally, there is an increased, but still
limited, inclusion of original studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries as opposed to
just high-income countries. Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature.
Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Therefore, this paper discusses
the purposes of LRs in dissertations and theses. Effectiveness of technology-enabled knowledge
translation strategies in improving the use of research in public health: systematic review.
Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers.
Consistent with the previous review, four main strategy types were identified: audit and feedback;
computerised decision support; opinion leaders; and multi-faceted interventions (MFIs). Thousands
of happy and grateful students prove our supremacy among other services and dedication to our
work. This framework emphasizes the need to make more deliberate choices regarding the
underlying conceptualization of leadership and the ways in which such a conceptualization is related
to the activities necessary for leading coproduction. Strategies for writing the literature review Find
a focus. In the last 36 months, she has received honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality and travel support from the WHO. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources
on a specific topic. Writing experts from our service also ensure a unique perspective on the subject.
To this end, the authors resorted to using narrative analysis and synthesis to describe the
effectiveness of handheld computers on accessing information for clinical knowledge, adherence to
safety and clinical quality guidelines, and diagnostic decision-making. History: The chronological
progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review,
if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology. Most empirical studies included in
this review mentioned leadership only in passing or derived some conclusions regarding leadership
from case studies focusing on other aspects of the coproduction process.
CH is co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. We identified
32 reviews conducted between 2010 and 2022. In summary, the review team should consider
privileging rich qualitative studies 2; consider a stepwise approach to inclusion of qualitative data
and explore the possibility of sampling ( table 2, item R5). It should be noted that the lack of
reporting bias assessment and certainty assessment represents a limitation of this study. Both authors
independently reviewed each of the identified articles to determine eligibility and extract study
information. Literature Reviews Found in Academic Journals The two types of literature reviews
commonly found in journals are those introducing research articles (studies and surveys) and stand-
alone literature analyses. For example, if you are researching the relationship between ecological
environments and human populations, provide models and theories that focus on specific aspects of
this connection to contextualize your study. We realize the importance of clear communication
process during the order writing, so our company gives you a rare opportunity to talk directly to your
writer for forwarding the meaningful information and controlling the writing performance. Preparing
a Reference List; Appendix A: Comprehensive Checklist; Appendix B: Sample Literature Reviews.
Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as medicine, nursing, and public health. The
unlabelled and unnamed manuscript that contains the poem had been buried for centuries beneath a
stack of more recent. Service users and community members play leadership roles in coproduction
initiatives related to health or well-being. In this paper, we made a systematic literature review of the
authentication systems based on PPG. Systematic reviews that involve the rigorous application of
scientific strategies aimed at limiting subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic and random errors) can
respond to this challenge. Meta-analyses are regarded as powerful tools for deriving meaningful
conclusions. Is it manageable? Begin writing down terms that are related to your question. When you
have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always,
but often Read more about synthesis here. In the present context, the notion of rigour refers to the
reliability and validity of the review process described in section 9.2. For one thing, reliability is
related to the reproducibility of the review process and steps, which is facilitated by a
comprehensive documentation of the literature search process, extraction, coding and analysis
performed in the review. The typology of literature reviews we used herein will allow eHealth
researchers, graduate students and practitioners to gain a better understanding of the similarities and
differences between review types. We present these findings together in the form of a framework
because consideration of both leadership models and practices prompts better and more conscious
choices, which can improve the quality of coproduction. The literature of a literature review refers to
any collection of materials on a topic, not literature reviews also provide a solid background for a
research paper's investigation. This can lead directly into your methodology section. Adobe Express
Go from Adobe Express creation to Issuu publication. However, it is also where you get to learn
about the topic in great detail. Involvement of topic experts can ensure that the rQES is responsive to
need. 14 17 One Cochrane rQES saved considerable time by agreeing the review topic within a
single meeting and one-phase iteration. 9 Decisions on topics to be omitted are also informed by a
knowledge of existing QESs. 17 An information specialist can help to manage the quantity and
quality of available evidence by setting conceptual boundaries and logistic limits. This can lead to an
incomplete or biased picture of the literature. We therefore determined that this exclusion criterion
was justifiable. Where to find databases: use the tabs on this guide Find other databases in the
Nursing Information Resources web page More on the Medical Library web page. Mixed-methods
literature review: This type of review combines quantitative and qualitative methods to synthesize
and analyze the available literature on a particular topic. When you find a useful book or article, you
can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.
Accordingly, we employed multiple pieces of information to construct a pattern. The sample of this
study consisted of 19 final year diploma students from the travel and tourism it is a community
action research of a community by a community for its community. Fourth, protocols, checklists and
bundles are used — most effectively when local ownership is encouraged. If you don’t know what to
say, start by reading everything written about it. Contact Creative Savants and get assistance from
our highly professional and qualified experts, who can provide you error and plagiarism free
literature review. In addition, those works whose theories and conclusions directly support your
findings will be valuable to review here. London: SAGE Publications; 2006. Pawson R., Greenhalgh
T., Harvey G., Walshe K. Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex
policy interventions. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key
concepts. Summarize individual studies or articles with as much or as little detail as each merits
according to its comparative importance in the literature, remembering that space (length) denotes
significance. In an RRL, you discuss knowledge and findings from existing literature relevant to
your study topic. As a result, the findings often do not make it into the subsequent systematic
reviews. A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social
innovation journey. Patient and Staff Engagement in Health System Improvement: A Qualitative
Evaluation of the Experience-Based Co-design Approach in Canada. The extracted data must be
presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the extant literature ( Jesson et
al., 2011 ). Webster and Watson (2002) warn researchers that literature reviews should be much more
than lists of papers and should provide a coherent lens to make sense of extant knowledge on a
given topic. This means that the writing should either be structured chronologically, thematically or
methodologically. Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what
you are trying to accomplish with the review. It aims to provide practical recommendations for
addressing a particular problem or issue. We’ve also got loads of proposal-related guides and videos
over on the Grad Coach blog. Our team carefully selects only skillful and knowledgeable writers to
ensure the excellence of our work performance. New York: Longman. Troyka, Lynn Quittman, and
Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster Handbook for Writers, 11th ed. A good RRL does NOT: A
literature review does not simply reference and list all of the material you have cited in your paper.
Marilyn Meisenheimer, Bemidji State University A wonderful step-by-step guide to the writing
process. I was initially skeptical and doubtful that the work could be done as requested. To this end,
they provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards
improving the design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table
9.1 outlines the main types of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and
summarizes the main characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. Get seat
assignments on sun country airlinesGet seat assignments on sun country airlines doctoral
dissertations in education. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion,
key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women. The
usefulness of this review is questionable because it cannot provide evidence of what is an effective
opinion leader, whether teams of opinion leaders or a single opinion leader are most effective, or the
most effective methods used by opinion leaders. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions,
opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body
of epistemological traditions within the field. We collected and filtered more than 700 papers, giving
us 44 relevant papers. We found that most systematic reviews are bounded by their clinical,
professional, spatial, system, or setting criteria and often seek to draw out implications for the
implementation of evidence in their areas of specific interest (such as nursing or acute care).