Explaining the Purpose of Conducting a Literature Review in Research

A literature review is an essential component of any research endeavor. It involves a systematic

examination and synthesis of scholarly literature relevant to a particular topic or research question.
The purpose of conducting a literature review is multifaceted and serves several crucial functions
within the research process.

1. Identifying Existing Knowledge: One of the primary objectives of a literature review is to

identify and understand the existing body of knowledge on a given topic. By reviewing
relevant literature, researchers can gain insights into what has already been studied,
established theories, methodologies used, and gaps in the current knowledge base.
2. Contextualizing the Research: A literature review helps situate the researcher's work within
the broader academic discourse. It provides the necessary context by demonstrating how the
proposed study fits into the existing body of literature. This contextualization is vital for
justifying the significance and relevance of the research question or hypothesis.
3. Defining Research Questions and Objectives: Through a thorough review of existing
literature, researchers can refine their research questions and objectives. By identifying gaps,
contradictions, or unanswered questions in previous studies, researchers can formulate
research questions that contribute meaningfully to the field.
4. Informing Methodological Choices: Literature reviews inform researchers about various
methodologies and approaches used in previous studies. This knowledge helps researchers
make informed decisions regarding their own research design, methods, and data collection
techniques.
5. Avoiding Redundancy and Replication: By familiarizing themselves with existing
literature, researchers can avoid duplicating previous studies. A comprehensive literature
review ensures that researchers are aware of what has already been done, enabling them to
build upon existing knowledge rather than duplicating efforts.
6. Identifying Potential Collaborators and Resources: Engaging with existing literature often
leads researchers to identify potential collaborators, experts in the field, or additional
resources that can enhance the quality of their research. Networking within the academic
community can open doors to valuable partnerships and opportunities.
7. Demonstrating Scholarly Rigor and Integrity: A well-conducted literature review is a
hallmark of scholarly rigor and integrity. It showcases the researcher's commitment to
thoroughly understanding the existing literature and building upon it in a meaningful way.
This enhances the credibility and trustworthiness of the research findings.

In conclusion, a literature review plays a vital role in shaping the direction and scope of research
projects. It serves as a foundation upon which new knowledge is built and contributes to the
advancement of academic discourse. Given the complexities involved in conducting a
comprehensive literature review, it is often beneficial to seek assistance from reputable academic
writing services. For expert guidance and support in crafting high-quality literature reviews, consider
ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔.
Meise 6 th Annual Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar. My above example ( Ndemewah and
Hiebl, 2022 ) probably falls into the anomalies camp, as large parts of the literature we covered
shared epistemological positions that clearly differed from what is usually considered to be
mainstream accounting research (i.e. quantitative research primarily based on archival data and
carrying a positivist worldview), rendering most research in the domain we covered as featuring
abnormal epistemological positions compared with mainstream accounting research. Use this list as
your personal literature review writing help, as it will assist you in avoiding significant pitfalls related
to this part of the research and writing process. It should only take two or three devoted sessions.
Another insight might be to identify some irregularity in the specifics of the review sample (cf. The
Study utilised mainly qualitative data and to a lesser extent quantitative data for predicting emerging
patterns. If you are interested in getting your research published, scanning the professional
environment in your area can be especially useful.Focus focusfocus! You will probably be refining
your topic as you search the literature and develop your lit review, BUT you should still start with as
focused a topic as possible. Article title, Name of journal, Volume number, Pages. The practice of
citing a source that you haven’t read directly is known as “grandfathering,” and it’s not allowed.
Along with these process steps, The author identifies three overarching specific challenges when
conducting such reviews and discusses potential remedies. First, I discuss how review authors may
generally approach the existing literature and portray it as incomplete, inadequate or incommensurate
( Locke and Golden-Biddle, 1997 ). Never on a Sunday! Is there a best day for submitting an article
for publication. Likewise, my experience of publishing several review papers in accounting journals
tells me that crafting reviews that primarily cover qualitative accounting research comes with its
challenges. In particular, it recommends initiation of a procurement database unit, under close
supervision of the newly established Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority
(PPDA), or Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), or Ministry of Finance. So, how should you
structure your literature review. A thin film of Zin oxide (ZnO) was used as a buffer layer of the
device. Reasons for Conducting a Literature Review Goals of a Literature Review Contents of a
Literature Review Examples. Identifying the research problem, forming the research question, and
selecting an appropriate methodology and research design are some of the initial challenges that
researchers encounter in the early stages of a qualitative research project. These are useful,
particularly for current information. To this end, process and output indicators need to be
incorporated into regular household surveys. The result of such a study will not be new and
interesting, and even the study process will be very mechanical without good interpretation or
enough exploration. Therefore, although cumbersome, authors may need to narrow the initial scope
of the review, refine their research question(s) and re-run their search for literature. While Aguinis
and Glavas (2012) do not cite “evidence-based thinking” as their guiding paradigm, they also do not
commit to a particular theory a priori but rather incorporate research findings from different areas of
management to inductively develop a theoretical framework that can guide future research. Before
beginning the process in its entirety, carefully plan and trial a critical appraisal tool, learning from
existing robust essential appraisal tools. With a full understanding about the purpose of a literature
review, people are better able to accomplish them,” says Callie M. Information seeking Critical
Reading Synthesis and structure Reflections on your literature review. Aimed at undergraduate
students in research methods courses or others with a lab or research project, each book describes a
key stage in the research process. Note: This article gives the views of the authors, and not the
position of the LSE Impact Blog, nor of the London School of Economics. If you have any
questions, please leave us a comment below that we’ll be happy to answer. They contrast a domain
theory with a method theory, the latter being defined as “a meta-level conceptual system, or
theoretical lens, which originates from another field such as organization studies or sociology” (
Lukka and Vinnari, 2014, p. 1312) and is more related to the second use case of a literature review
sketched above.
Such a scholar can be expected to have read the vast majority of the research items included in a
review sample. An easier way is just to drop us a message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right
of the page. It is worth knowing that some of the details of a qualitative research project cannot be
ascertained in advance and may be specified as they arise during the research process. I denne
studien utforer vi en litteraturgjennomgang av skandinaviske studier som berorer kritisk lesing i en
utdanningskontekst, og fokuserer pa lesing av sakprosatekster innenfor norsk og samfunnsfag.
Researcher should justify the reason for which he or she selected qualitative research. This problem
may be rooted in the initially chosen topic for review or the research question(s), which may simply
be too broad to be answered by the literature review, especially if the authors want to publish it as a
standalone paper, and thus, need to comply with typical page length restrictions for journal articles.
References Style 1. Book:Author Name(s), Author Sir Name(s), (Year). Related Posts 2018 in
review: top posts of the year December 31st, 2018. Literature Review. Included in all research Logic
behind your research. You can also draw on books written by well-established subject matter experts.
The literature review sections of doctoral theses are often geared toward the domain of accounting
research in which the thesis is positioned, and thus, use case (i) ( Batt, 2020; Braumann, 2017;
Lohlein, 2015; Weigel, 2020 ), although exceptions do exist, including those more geared toward the
method theories applied in accounting research, and thus, use case (ii) ( Janka, 2019 ). They do not
have any clear understanding of the research process in terms of data gathering strategies, data
analysis method, and even appropriate sampling plan, which should be indentified based on
philosophical and methodological principles. Introduce the literature review by pointing out the
major research topic that will be discussed. One specific way to consider the contribution of a review
paper is to step into the shoes of a well-read scholar in the domain, theory or method covered by the
literature review. I nevertheless hope that it is useful to account researchers interested in crafting
reviews of qualitative accounting research. 2. Three potential advantages and three basic use cases of
reviews of qualitative accounting research Literature reviews can be classified in various ways (
Booth et al., 2021; Cronin and George, 2023; Fan et al., 2022; Kraus et al., 2022; Paul and Criado,
2020; Snyder, 2019 ). IMPORTANT: Each digital library’s search engine works in a specific way.
Writing and reviewing the Literature is the key for doing the ends of each academic and even other
guidelines problem and others. Virtues of qualitative research Qualitative research does not promise a
clear or direct and orderly method of tackling research problems in health studies. Contextualizing
the study Describe the bigger that provides the background Create the space or gap for your
research Where do we find the literature review in a dissertation or thesis. It was established and
linked around the 17th Century. The review of literature actually provides the background for the
research problem. Similar to use case (ii) reviews, these use case (iii) reviews usually focus solely on
the accounting literature and typically only include research published in accounting journals in their
review samples. The amount of information is excessive, and it is particularly challenging to find
some relevant results and worthy references. On the other hand, the survey of soft sciences provides
an overview and synthesis of many schools of thought and how they are connected. Similar to
business and management research, where advice on conducting impactful literature reviews has
long been scarce ( Breslin et al., 2021; Kraus et al., 2020; Kunisch et al., 2018, 2023 ), advice resting
on more systematic analyses of past practices of reviewing the accounting literature may be needed
for accounting research, too. However, at the beginning of a project, researchers may be uncertain
about what exactly they intend to know, so vague questions can lead to an unfocused project. The Lit
Review is primarily concerned with sources, while the paper’s body is concerned with the topic you
are researching. The published paper appears to have followed a straightforward linear process: select
a topic to review, focus on one or two central theories, analyze the underlying literature with these
theories in mind, and then report on the results. The a priori information involved into the methods
studied in the thesis is. This can include citation and reference formatting issues (for example,
Harvard or APA style errors), or just a straight out lack of references.
This means that we must follow the plan defined in the review protocol which, among other things,
establishes a well-defined sequence of steps. An example of this type of review might be the recent
work by Modell (2022b). That is a wonderful privilege, but you need to get those questions right if
you dig into people's lives and ask about their real experiences. References Style 1. Book:Author
Name(s), Author Sir Name(s), (Year). Purpose of accessibility review Structure and organization of
review committee Key guideline documents Revisit accessibility in the context of assessment
Accessibility issues to consider. But this reasoning is fumble since qualitative research is a complex
methodology where data collection and analysis can be mostly challenging. Direct quotations,
indirect quotations or paraphrasing, as well as any information attributable to other researchers and
individuals - require citations. Based on my experience, novice researchers have some problems
finding the right topics in their field of interest because they do not perform a broad literature
review to find the gaps and problems suitable to be investigated. Print Friendly Literature Reviews
Getting started What is a literature review. Literature review samiyah musallam, Ameenah
mohammad, Haya ali, Eman saleh, A. Report bugs here All feedback is valuable Please share your
general feedback Join us on our journey Platform update page. Remember, the purpose of the
literature review is to build the theoretical foundation that will help you achieve your research aims
and objectives, and answer your research questions. A qualitative researcher will have the chance of
discovering the “significant truths” in the lives of people. In this paper, I reanalyzed the empirical
parts of published qualitative accounting research articles with a so-far underused theoretical
paradigm in mind (i.e. embedded agency). My argument was that we could learn much from
published case studies for the theory under focus, even if most of the papers I analyzed originally
featured a (slightly) different theoretical framing. Still, they do provide an excellent beginning point
for finding better, more extensive materials. Det har riktignok vist seg a v?re utfordrende a vurdere
kritisk lesing, blant annet fordi begrepet er vagt og krevende a definere. This is of particular concern
when reviews address policy- and practice-relevant questions. Method-slurring is another common
problem, which means the act of blurring distinctions between qualitative approaches. Thus, you can
cite numerous references in the same paragraph in a typical Lit Review, and you can mention the
same reference in more than one paragraph if the source discusses more than one of the Lit Review’s
subtopics. In other words, your study will attempt to contribute a missing puzzle piece (or get two
pieces to fit together). Thank you, for helping us keep this platform clean. Literature Review.
Included in all research Logic behind your research. By M R Selamat. By this session you should be
able to. The Au (NRs) had a different of size of NR1 (Width: 4 nm; Length: 12 nm), NR2 (Width: 5
nm; Length: 16 nm), NR3 (Width: 6 nm; Length: 22 nm) which were measured using a TEM
technique. Based on the data analysis, carefully select the synthesis method. This is the situation
when you are asked to investigate the existing state of research on your issue and then analyze and
synthesize your results. A strategy or blueprint that plans the action for carrying through the research
data. Elements. An easier way is just to drop us a message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right
of the page. By M R Selamat. By the end of this presentation, you should be able to. Newspaper
articles tend to target a general (not specialized) audience; hence, they will not be of use to your Lit
Review.
Literature reviews are now much more challenging to compile today than they used to be. HI6007
Statistics and Research Methods for Business Decisions. He researches evidence synthesis
methodology and conducts systematic reviews and maps in the field of sustainability and
environmental science. At the same time, Repenning et al. (2022) reveal that while each
paradigmatic camp acknowledges the existence of the other camp, contributions are regularly framed
compared with existing research within the own camp. By contrast, for the use case (ii), the
application of a method theory is at the core of the review, and thus, focusing on a predefined
theoretical lens to analyze the review sample is an inherent ingredient of such reviews. 4.2 Sample
selection and comprehensiveness of review samples 4.2.1 comprehensiveness of review samples.
Meta-analysis should never be used instead of vote counting, and formal narrative synthesis methods
should be used to summarize and describe the evidence base. It is not distance that qualitative
researchers want between themselves and their participants, but the opportunity to connect with
them at a human level (Epistemology). They also present one repository currently being built for
readings by underrepresented authors that are Black, Indigenous or people of color. This is of
particular concern when reviews address policy- and practice-relevant questions. A collection of all
the scholarly writings on a topic A systematic method for identifying, evaluating and interpreting the
work produced by researchers. All features. Predictor. Feature subset. Embedded method. All
features. Wrapper. Predictor. Filters. Properly quote literature from within your thesis. The qualitative
research question delineates the procedures that are executed in the study and provides a map to the
readers by which they can trail the researcher's intentions and actions in the study. Google search
doesn't show relevant results Though they say that everything can be found in Google, when it
comes to literature review writing, it is not particularly accurate. Challenges confronting beginning
researchers in conducting literature Conducting literature review is a complicated, sometimes
confusing and laborious process that beginning educational researchers, especially graduate students,
often find challenging. In any case, it seems hard to decide whether a literature review should be
more theory-led or more evidence-based before a full analysis of the review sample. You can also
draw on books written by well-established subject matter experts. The excitement here means the
activity of your cognitive system, its ability to focus, to concentrate on the material, often a boring
one. This can include citation and reference formatting issues (for example, Harvard or APA style
errors), or just a straight out lack of references. Prior to his early retirement from Uganda’s Public
Service he served as Head of HRH Man-agement Department in Uganda’s Health Sector where he
led development of the first ever HRH Policy and Strategic Plan in 2006. Print Friendly Literature
Reviews Getting started What is a literature review. This lack of attention makes you lose some
details, which are necessary for writing a successful literary review. Literature review (presentation)
Literature review (presentation) hood ibanda 3. The researcher will conduct a literature review to
identify other research that relates to the research question. Unlike the first two use cases, use case
(iii) reviews are rarely informed by a specific theory and are naturally bound to the specific method
adopted by the research items in the review sample. A correspondent whom the researcher contacted
provided research assistance. We should be aware of most common difficulties that arise during the
writing process of a literature review. The result of such a study will not be new and interesting, and
even the study process will be very mechanical without good interpretation or enough exploration.
Some chapters can waffle on for pages and pages and leave the reader thinking, “so what?” So, how
do you decide what’s relevant. Possible solution: Analyze your state, decide whether you are too
excited or not enough.
In turn, other reviews have been less concerned with specific accounting phenomena and more
interested in the application of a certain method theory to accounting research. While most
experienced qualitative accounting researchers may be aware of the latter benefits of theory-led use
case (i) reviews, few, in my experience, are open to more inductive, evidence-based reviews of a
certain domain of accounting research. As a result of this review, they are either accepted or rejected
by the journal. For example, you may want to cite a collection of newspaper articles to demonstrate
the emergence of a recent trend. Writing a literature review, you should remember about the
topicality of the particular sources, the academic “power” of their authors, etc. If you find that some
journals in your area of research are not accessible, it may be advisable to talk to your librarian to
potentially request for subscription to the journals you wish to access. An easier way is just to drop us
a message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right of the page. According to the analysis of survey
data presented in this Situation Analysis, vulnerability is widespread among children in Uganda. The
perfect literature review saves time, energy and resources for policies makers, academics, writers,
readers, and the problems are clearly well-known, and the concepts are properly targeted. It collects
what is known up to a point in time and indicates the direction for future research. Keeping the
review sample manageable in this way may also be achieved by limiting potentially relevant research
items according to their publication date. This way you will have a list of references in your email,
and later you will be able to use them without wasting too much time. This will give you a clear
picture of what a high-quality literature review looks like and hopefully provide some inspiration for
your own. Knowing the type of claim needed to answer your research question will let you know the
kinds of arguments you need to be looking for as you gather and analyze the literature. The amount
of information is excessive, and it is particularly challenging to find some relevant results and worthy
references. And such prior knowledge can be identified by means of a literature review ( Lukka and
Vinnari, 2014 ). Journalists aren’t usually scholars, which means they aren’t specialists on the topics
they write about; hence newspaper stories aren’t scholarly sources. Hence, the mere synthesis of the
individual findings brings a few fresh insights. This is deemed viable and feasible because there are
already informal groupings addressing needs similar to group sourcing aspects. The synthesized
materials were characterized by different techniques such as transmission electron microscopy
(TEM), UV-Vis spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). All too often, we encounter
literature reviews that, at first glance, look pretty good. However, it is very important to take time to
choose a research question, because it can be a very challenging exercise. The authors report the
example of a researcher who was required to provide. However, it’s (generally) unlikely to be as
academically sound (i.e., well-researched, objective and scientific) as a journal article, so you need to
be a lot more sceptical when considering this content and make sure that it has a strong, well-
reasoned foundation. However, this paper is based on personal experience that usually does not end
up being published in academic journals rather than being built on a systematic review of prior
reviews. Selects and sources the information that is necessary to. Alternatively, if authors have
analyzed a review sample and concluded that available theories may be inadequate for fully grasping
the phenomenon in question, they could then opt for a more evidence-based or theory discovery type
of review ( Breslin and Gatrell, 2023 ). This research question will allow you to undergo a more
efficient process of literature search. This section aims to highlight important choices, including the
extent of an author’s criticism of the literature and the decision on whether to publish the review as a
standalone paper. Contextualization: Enables researchers to understand how their work fits into the
broader academic conversation and contributes to the existing body of knowledge.
The researcher will conduct a literature review to identify other research that relates to the research
question. The study finally recommends extending further research in the field of group sourcing to
cover other sectors of the economy, mainly the private business sector. Along with these process
steps, The author identifies three overarching specific challenges when conducting such reviews and
discusses potential remedies. Relatedly, accounting researchers may discuss the same or a similar
empirical phenomenon using a set of different terms and language. They conclude that most prior
studies in this field have exclusively contributed to the domain of management accounting research,
with only a small fraction contributing to actor network theory more generally. Demonstrates your
familiarity with existing knowledge in the field Directs readers to other literature of interest. To
illustrate this point, the first version of a review article I authored ( Hiebl, 2018 ) was built on a
review sample of only 22 articles. These are frequently used in Lit Reviews since they offer concise,
up-to-date information. Here, they share their insights on how to overcome seven top research
challenges. Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection skeletal system details with joints and its types skeletal
system details with joints and its types Minaxi patil. Structuring a literature review Directing the
argument and synthesising sources Being critical in your literature review. Identifying the research
problem and forming the research question are some of the initial challenges that researchers
encounter in the early stages of a qualitative research project. Another reason that students land up
with a poor structure is that they start writing their literature chapter prematurely. Seminal works are
the theoretical foundation of a strong literature review. However, it is very important to take time to
choose a research question, because it can be a very challenging exercise. What flaws do you believe
should be addressed in your paper. Write the review Thompson Writing Studio This link opens in a
new window Need to write a systematic review. Making it easier. Information Overload versus
Information Literacy. Still, they do provide an excellent beginning point for finding better, more
extensive materials. The most common problems encountered in literature reviews are Developing
hypotheses about populations that you have no hope of randomly sampling from given your time
and resource limitations. Methodological reviews may, thus, chart ways in which researchers can use
new methods and avoid methodological pitfalls. The best case scenario was medical support reaching
only 15 percent of the children in the households surveyed. Your final review needs to show that you
analyzed the literature critically and organized each piece you include within a theme or argument.
In other words, what do researchers disagree on and why might that be. Again, I would advise you
speak with your professor, but there are also a lot of books available in the library about topic
selection and refinement. As a result of this review, they are either accepted or rejected by the
journal. This link opens in a new window Contact a Librarian Ask a Librarian Definition: A literature
review is a systematic examination and synthesis of existing scholarly research on a specific topic or
subject. Similarly, the available examples of methodological reviews of accounting research (see
above), and thus, use case (iii) have mostly been (co-)authored by experienced scholars. The amount
of information is excessive, and it is particularly challenging to find some relevant results and worthy
references. Browse and manage your votes from your Member Profile Page Written by Virily Editor
One comment.