Writing a literature review on Utilitarianism can be a daunting task for many students and

researchers. This philosophical theory, with its intricate history and diverse interpretations, requires a
comprehensive understanding of various texts, scholarly articles, and academic debates. Crafting a
literature review that not only summarizes existing research but also critically evaluates different
perspectives and contributes to the discourse is indeed challenging.

One of the main difficulties in writing a literature review on Utilitarianism lies in the vastness of the
subject matter. Utilitarianism has been discussed and analyzed by philosophers, ethicists, and scholars
for centuries, resulting in a plethora of literature spanning different time periods, cultural contexts,
and philosophical traditions. Navigating through this extensive body of work, identifying key
themes, and synthesizing diverse viewpoints requires significant time and effort.

Furthermore, the complexity of Utilitarianism itself adds another layer of challenge. From the
classical formulations by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill to contemporary developments and
critiques, there is a multitude of perspectives to consider. Engaging with these perspectives while
maintaining coherence and clarity in the literature review demands careful attention to detail and
analytical rigor.

Moreover, writing a literature review involves more than just summarizing existing research. It
requires critical thinking, synthesis of ideas, and the ability to identify gaps or unresolved questions
in the literature. Constructing a compelling argument that contributes meaningfully to the ongoing
discourse on Utilitarianism requires a nuanced understanding of the subject and the ability to
contextualize one's own research within the broader academic landscape.

Given the challenges associated with writing a literature review on Utilitarianism, many students
and researchers may find it beneficial to seek assistance from professional writing services like ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔. By leveraging the expertise of experienced writers who are well-versed in
philosophical theories and academic writing conventions, individuals can ensure the quality and
integrity of their literature review. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers tailored assistance to help clients
navigate the complexities of writing a literature review, providing valuable insights, meticulous
research, and polished prose to enhance the scholarly impact of their work.

In conclusion, writing a literature review on Utilitarianism is a demanding task that requires careful
attention to detail, critical thinking, and scholarly engagement. For those seeking assistance in
crafting a comprehensive and insightful literature review, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers specialized
services to facilitate the process and enhance the quality of academic research.
You should note that a utilitarian considers all people to be of equal value to.! On society by the
emerging COVID-19 pandemic have produced novel interactions and tensions within normative
ethical theory ) unless! ( Mepham 31 ). Therefore, Mill is already suggesting that people who adhere
to moral rules are actually utilitarians because they are willing to break those rules for the sake of
utility. Not only does he show the primacy of the utilitarian principle over a justice principle in terms
of its scope, but he demonstrates how it is capable of resolving disputes over justice. Who would be
a dissatisfied Socrates when he could be a satisfied fool. It is the duty of every person following
utilitarianism to help people without thinking about the consequences. He thought more people
would be happy because he saved his life but as it turns out Hitler went on to make millions of
people suffer, causing them a lot of unhappiness. The concept of utilitarianism was first looked into
keenly by Jeremy Bentham. As in “On Liberty”, Mill starts from a principle of simple formulation,
but with vast implications and consequences in its applicability to practical life. Utilitarianism is a
normative ethical theory that identifies the good with utility and the right with that which maximizes
utility. The exigency and scarcity thrust on society by the emerging COVID-19 pandemic have
produced novel interactions and tensions within normative ethical theory. So, when Christians were
fed to the lions by the Romans, despite the majority involved getting the pleasure of watching
Christians being eaten, this is a low, animalistic pleasure, that is outweighed by the higher pleasure of
the minority, the Christians, in wanting to survive. Weak rule followers seem to be no different from
Act Utilitarians. In Rome and Greece, societies ruled by the people themselves, it came to mean
following the laws that should exist, not necessarily the sometimes wrongly conceived laws that do
exist. I did not factor in the following:- - I'm getting on a bit - After 10 hours at work I tend to be a
bit tired. - The writing is thick and complex and very nuanced. This theory is based on the
elucidation that a consequence of an action justifies the moral acceptability of means to reach an end,
and the results of the action outweigh any other considerations. He interprets these instincts in terms
of his picture of justice, showing that the instinctual desire for equality and reciprocity should be the
basis of any justice system, except when these values come in conflict with one another or with
utility. The doctor could have never known because we can’t see the future. There were sentences
that were so long and thick and twisty turny that as I approached the end of them I had forgotten
where they began. It is often objected that utilitarianism leads to discrimination against those in
protected categories,40 such as the elderly, disabled, women, ethnic minority groups, Unauthorized
use of these marks is strictly prohibited. (Original work published 1785).Kant, Immanuel. Picture
this. Oxford University Press, USA, 2001. Regarding the latitude of the blast site Consent to the
forefront despite the moral shortcomings of utilitarianism the. It is the only moral framework that can
define military force or war. Here he provided a survey of many ideas current at the time, about the
distinction of justice and other fields of the moral utilitarian thesis. However, from the point of view
of prevailing morality, the choice has been to vaccinate the elderly first, leaving the economically
active people (and presumably healthier) population for the end. An act is right or wrong according
to the good or bad consequences. So, if 10 rapists were to rape the same woman, then using the
Hedonic Calculus, their pleasure would outweigh the woman’s pain. Outline and explain the ethical
theory of utilitarianism b) Evaluate. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are
stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.
Mill has completed his analysis of justice and explained what it has to do with utility: the feeling of
injustice reflects an instinctual response to a certain kind of immoral, happiness-stifling behavior, and
the enacting of justice involves directing these instincts toward the social good (the promotion of
utility). So a utilitarian looking back on this would say that to save the baby was the wrong thing to
do because of what he did in his life. What looks like a paragraph sometimes turns into one sentence
with commas and semi-colons.
Utilitarianism. Though this is a brief summary of both ethical egoism and. They should, in turn, be
the basis of human society, and this is Mill’s philosophical justification for his unshakeable belief in
providing equal rights and social services to all people. Now that you've had a glimpse of Mill's
background, here's the definition of utilitarianism: a theory in normative ethics holding that the
proper course of action is the one that maximizes utility, usually defined as maximizing happiness
and reducing suffering. Accordingly, he now turns to more concrete arguments against the idea that
justice is an independent, absolute moral value “totally independent of utility” (rather than, as Mill
thinks, an instinctive interpretation of the utilitarian principle). This conclusion is a fascinating one
that went on to inspire many future liberals. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality
for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource
to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. This time prevents people from making hasty,
unethical judgements, as it encourages thought before action. Each person desires his own happiness,
therefore each person ought to aim at his happiness, and therefore everyone ought to aim at the
happiness of everyone. The chapter on justice saves it a little bit but he doesn't seem to offer any
solutions. It took me 7 reads to feel like I really got the gist of what John Stuart Mills was trying to
express on ethics and happiness. Mill’s implication, of course, is that the instinct about what people
morally deserve is ultimately based in utilitarianism. He disliked the religious and traditional
moralities of his day, created a secular, non-transcendental, independent ethical system which did not
reply on religious authority. What looks like a paragraph sometimes turns into one sentence with
commas and semi-colons. See other similar resources ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save
for later Not quite what you were looking for. There is no ethical framework that rescues doctors
from morally devastating decisions in times of. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure
quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this
resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. The argument he presents here is the
most straightforward and undeniable one: different people think different things are just and unjust.
If a limitation is applied to utilitarianism, it tends to create a black and white construct of mortality.
Our Teacher Edition on Utilitarianism makes teaching easy. It is a secular, non-transcendental ethical
system completely independent from religion, which focuses around the concept of hedonism and
the principle of utility. Not comparing this patch of sunlight to yesterday’s patch of sunlight.
However if applying even one of these factors, let alone all seven, it causes a problem. Web
Accessibility, Copyright 2023 Ethics Unwrapped - McCombs School of Business The University of
Texas at Austin, Being Your Best Self, Part 1: Moral Awareness, Being Your Best Self, Part 2: Moral
Decision Making, Being Your Best Self, Part 3: Moral Intent, Being Your Best Self, Part 4: Moral
Action, Ethical Leadership, Part 1: Perilous at the Top, Ethical Leadership, Part 2: Best Practices,
Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research, Curbing Corruption: GlaxoSmithKline in China. He
believed that there are different levels of pleasure. From this Bentham proposed the hedonic calculus
which had seven criteria; intensity, duration, purity, extent, certainty, fecundity and remoteness. You
have a certain responsibility and duty to your family and the closest people around you. People who
follow utilitarianism are known as utilitarians. Again, Mill clarifies the distinction between judicial
and moral laws. Ethics is the reflection of the societies ideals of what is right and wrong
utilitarianism is a ethical. It says that if an action is right, it results in happiness and would lead to the
betterment of a group or a society.
Something that these theories miss about the ethical aspects of current and subjects. If someone
threatens your happiness you punish them. See other similar resources ?1.00 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. But no longer. I recant this view
and I extend my apologies to pigs and fools. Psychologists commonly described cases of fragmented
or multiple agency. Here, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, as the fecundity of
saving five lives and one person dying is greater than the fecundity of one life being saved. I'd
recommend this book to anybody getting into ethical studies. Apart from act-utilitarianism and rule-
utilitarianism, there is a concept known as negative utilitarianism. R.N Smart introduced it.
Utilitarianism is a traditional and ethical philosophy that is associated with Jeremy Bentham and his
fellow mate John Mill. Since it focuses on the greatest number, the theory is quantitative. Mill now
returns to several of the instincts that make up the idea of justice, but which people often erroneously
take as valuable in and of themselves (rather than as indirect expressions of the principle of utility).
This is because the two methods are so diverse and although the decision made by each type may be
similar I believe that act utilitarian’s can produce more reasoning for their final judgement.
Utilitarianism, the British government spread false intelligence to the enemy regarding the latitude of
poor. Get the entire Utilitarianism LitChart as a printable PDF. Report this Document Download
now Save Save Literature Review - Ethics For Later 0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0
votes) 835 views 5 pages An Analysis of Key Ethical Theories, Principles, and Considerations
Relevant to Professionals Serving on an Advisory Board Uploaded by MadhushiWijeratna AI-
enhanced title and description This document discusses ethics in business and professions.
Bentham’s approach later became known as Act Utilitarianism. He goes on to discuss the criticisms
the Utilitarian theory received and affirms that for utilitarians virtue is possibly an end ( as some see
virtue as happiness). When it is advantageous (good for utility), it is all right to break the norm of
equality. I might try and read a different philosopher at some point as you can get them free for you
kindle but really I need to win a shed load of money, do a philosophy course and study books like
these. This question of punishment, Mill argues, divides morality from “ expediency and worthiness”
in general. John Stewart Mill was the son of the 17th century British philosopher James mill. For
instance, defenders of different models of punishment all say that their own model of justice is the
right one because criminals deserve some particular kind of treatment, but none can coherently
explain why their idea of what criminals deserve is truer than any other idea. In contrast, Rule
Utilitarianism would focus on developing general rules to apply in such cases, regardless of the very
specific features of every individual case. Short Essay on Utilitarianism 150 Words in English Short
Essay on Utilitarianism is usually given to classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The fact that he distinguishes
between them shows that Mill’s moral calculus is not as simple as it is often made out to be: while it
is true that actions are good if and only if they contribute to the general happiness (and bad if and
only if they detract from it), this is not the only relevant moral distinction that can be made. Treated
in that class were Natural Law Ethics, Deontology and Utilitarianism. There are principles that work
as a general means or securing the greater good. The concept of act-utilitarianism means, each time an
action is decided upon, that particular event is completely different than any other actions that are
needed to be calculated. They are linked in the sense that legal systems should seek to approximate
morality as closely as possible in the proper domains of life. A preference utilitarian judges a moral
action according to whether they fit in with the preferences of the individuals involved to achieve the
greatest good.