Crafting a literature review can be a daunting task for many students and researchers alike.

It requires
not only a comprehensive understanding of the topic at hand but also the ability to critically analyze
existing literature and synthesize it into a coherent narrative. From identifying relevant sources to
organizing them in a meaningful way, every step of the process demands meticulous attention to
detail and a considerable amount of time and effort.

One of the biggest challenges of writing a literature review is the sheer volume of information
available. With countless articles, books, and studies published on any given subject, sifting through
the vast sea of literature can quickly become overwhelming. Moreover, determining which sources
are credible and relevant to your research can be a daunting task in itself.

Another hurdle that many students face is ensuring that their literature review is not just a summary
of existing research but a critical analysis that adds value to the academic discourse. This requires not
only identifying key themes and debates within the literature but also offering insightful
interpretations and perspectives.

Given the complexity and time-consuming nature of writing a literature review, many students opt to
seek assistance from professional writing services. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is a trusted platform that
offers expert assistance with literature reviews and other academic assignments. With a team of
experienced writers and researchers, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can help you navigate the intricacies of the
literature review process and deliver a high-quality paper that meets your academic needs.

Whether you're struggling to get started or feeling overwhelmed by the task ahead, ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ is here to support you every step of the way. Place your order today and take the first step
towards crafting a literature review that showcases your academic prowess and enhances your
research.
For more information, please see our handout on plagiarism. There is an increasing interest in the
visual aspects of social media. A review is a required part of grant and research proposals and often a
chapter in theses and dissertations. Writing the body In the body, you should: Group research studies
and other types of literature (reviews, theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) according to common
denominators such as qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors, specific
purpose or objective, chronology, etc. It examines seven bias areas including random sequence
generation, allocation concealment, participant and staff blinding, self-reported result assessment
blinding, objective measure assessment blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and
additional biases. Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme
or issue? 4. Acupuncture for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. By answering this
question, we hope to provide an overview of which groups and populations have been studied. What
are the strengths and weaknesses of the various methodologies. Any discrepancies or uncertainties
highlighted by this exercise will be discussed and the charting form will be adjusted accordingly. You
dust off a novel and a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue a “thumbs
up” or “thumbs down” as you leaf through the pages. “Literature review” done. Use these successful
examples as a starting point for understanding how other writers have approached the challenging
and important task of situating their idea in the context of established research. Effectiveness of
mobilisation of the upper cervical region and craniocervical flexor training on orofacial pain,
mandibular function and headache in women with TMD. The only difference here between a
“chronological” and a “thematic” approach is what is emphasized the most: the development of the
harpoon or the harpoon technology.But more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from
chronological order. This is of particular importance given prompt diagnosis and intervention can
improve ED treatment outcomes and recovery prospects. 28 In this scoping review, we aim to
examine the extent, range and nature of research activity into disordered eating and EDs among
minority ethnic populations in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Quality control must be
fit for purpose but not excessive. Remember that getting top notch dissertation literature review help
from EssaysService.com, you will also get all the materials collected and analyzed, but with no time
wasted on search. Analyzing data using quantitative or qualitative methods. How well do they
present the material and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory. Consider Whether
Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as
possible. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your
own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. A set of
predetermined rules provides a basis for including or excluding certain studies. For each publication,
ask yourself: What question or problem is the author addressing. The present scoping review aims to
examine the extent, range and nature of research activity into disordered eating and EDs in the UK,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand providing a comprehensive overview of the existing literature.
Studies in which no clinical data and complex interventions were excluded. A team should start by
specifying the phenomenon of interest, the review question, 9 the perspectives to be included 9 and
the sample to be determined and selected. 10 Subsequently, the team must finalise the appropriate
choice of synthesis. 11 Above all, the review team should consider the intended knowledge users, 3
including requirements of the funder. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. With
Visa and Mastercard checkout options, your payments for service are out of danger. My question is
that do I put all the variables into a single conceptual framework or each hypothesis will have it own
conceptual framework. A third reviewer will resolve disagreements if necessary.
The findings show that acupuncture is short-term helpful for reducing the severity of TMD pain
with muscle origin. Consider joining the Center for Cancer Research (CCR) at the National Cancer
Institute Bethesda, Maryland (US) NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) Postdoctoral Fellow (PhD)
Houston, Texas (US) Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Professional-Track Faculty Positions
Available. So nice to find somebody with some genuine thoughts on this issue. Seriously. thank you
for starting this up. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current
research and practices. International journal of clinical practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267. The population’s
age categories are also a drawback because they are extremely diverse and do not take age into
account as a confounding factor. Non-hodgkin Lymphoma affecting the tongue: unusual intra-oral
location. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or
for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered. For
instance, a thematic review of material on sperm whales might examine how they are portrayed as
“evil” in cultural documents. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with
old interpretations. The randomization process reported 100% of the studies with a low risk of bias.
Some databases to search for journals and articles include: Your university’s library catalogue
Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and
biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science) You can use
boolean operators to help narrow down your search: Read the abstract to find out whether an article
is relevant to your question. Take a look at this great thesis literature review sample. If the same thing
is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit
a conceptual dead end. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and
whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for
sciences as well). How can the existing methodologies inform my own methodology? 3: The
Conclusion Section Once you’ve completed the body section of your literature review using one of
the structural approaches we discussed above, you’ll need to “wrap up” your literature review and
pull all the pieces together to set the direction for the rest of your dissertation or thesis. But it can be
feasibly done through following a structured approach to data collection and analysis. Look at
sources the authors cite to in their work. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your
own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. All studies that had multiple
therapeutic interventions applied in the study groups or those that did not fulfill the criteria of a RCT
were excluded. The Fig. 1 shows the methodologic development of the review and the studies
excluded. Our recommendations derive from current QES guidance, 5 evidence on modified QES
methods, 8 13 and practical experience. 14 15 This paper presents an overview of considerations and
recommendations as described in table 2. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review.
Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred. Publications Account
settings Browse Titles NCBI Bookshelf. Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way
to an understanding of the subject? II. There are various referencing styles, and non-compliance with
them might affect your grade. Equally importantly, you need to have a structure in place before you
start writing, or your literature review will most likely end up a rambling, disjointed mess. Fill out
the form, provide task specifications, and get an overview compliant with them. By statistically
combining data from multiple studies, meta-analyses can create more precise and reliable estimates of
intervention effects than those derived from individual studies alone, when these are examined
independently as discrete sources of information. There will be no quality assessment of the included
studies.
In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are
writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.
Last but not least, if it’s your intention to develop a conceptual framework for your dissertation or
thesis, the conclusion section is a good place to present this. Data to be extracted will include some
standard information about the paper. All RCTs of acupuncture for TMD were searched without
language restrictions. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research. It provides
background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. Evaluate and
Select Sources: Filter the source list by selecting studies that are directly relevant and of sufficient
quality, considering factors like credibility, objectivity, accuracy, and validity. Question 3: which
populations have been targeted for this research. The basic components of a literature review
include: 5. Excellence is the thing we never sacrifice for anything. The team should consider whether
a conceptual model, theory or framework offers a rapid way for organising, coding, interpreting and
presenting findings ( table 2, item R18). Below are the general guidelines on which this part is
usually based. Publications Account settings Browse Titles NCBI Bookshelf. It goes beyond
documentation and reflects decisions related to the selection of the sources, the search terms used,
the period of time covered, the articles selected in the search, and the application of backward and
forward searches ( vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). In short, the rigour of any review article is reflected by
the explicitness of its methods (i.e., transparency) and the soundness of the approach used. A team
should start by specifying the phenomenon of interest, the review question, 9 the perspectives to be
included 9 and the sample to be determined and selected. 10 Subsequently, the team must finalise
the appropriate choice of synthesis. 11 Above all, the review team should consider the intended
knowledge users, 3 including requirements of the funder. Systematic Approaches to a Successful
Literature Review. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends and patterns (in
theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time. Also, make
sure to include opposing views (and not just supporting evidence). Our literature review top tips
suggest some specific things you can do to help you submit a successful review. There are many
resources that offer step-by-step guidance for writing a literature review, and you can find some of
them under Other Resources in the menu to the left. However, it’s also essential to remember
examples of older studies and keep the balance between them and the newer research. In terms of
the technical aspects of the acupuncture treatment used in the RCT, the duration of each session
varied between 15 48 and 51, 20 53,54 and 30 min. Receive feedback on language, structure, and
formatting Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on: Academic style Vague
sentences Style consistency See an example To begin organizing your literature review’s argument
and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve
read. Sample Literature Reviews An important strategy for learning how to compose literature
reviews in your field or within a specific genre is to locate and analyze representative examples. If
you’d also rather trust an expert than write an overview yourself, there’s good news. If your
assignment is not very specific, seek clarification from your instructor: Roughly how many sources
should you include. However, despite similar and in some cases increased prevalence of disordered
eating and EDs among minority ethnic groups, there appear to be disparities when it comes to ED
diagnosis and treatment. Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence
pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized
methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data
from the studies that are included in the review. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature
Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Once
you’ve decided on the organizational method for the body of the review, the sections you need to
include in the paper should be easy to figure out.
It’s needed to give potential readers an overview of the writing content, helping to decide whether
their research determines it. Non-hodgkin Lymphoma affecting the tongue: unusual intra-oral
location. To date, most of the existing literature exploring disordered eating and EDs among
minority ethnic groups has been conducted in the USA. However high efficacy of Laser Acupuncture
in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders was reported. Pick one of these themes to focus the
organization of your review. Studies in which no clinical data and complex interventions were
excluded. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure
to represent the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Our literature
review top tips suggest some specific things you can do to help you submit a successful review.
There are a few ways to find the forms or templates you need. For example, a thematic map may not
require assessment of individual studies—a brief statement of the generic limitations of the set of
studies may be sufficient. Conclusion: Summarize the key findings you have taken from the
literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your primary research question How
should I organize my lit review. Clinical trial with bromelain in third molar exodontia. Ideally, this
will provide more reliable findings, leading to higher-quality conclusions and recommendations for
further research. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC Rapid Qualitative Evidence
Synthesis (QES) is a relatively recent innovation in evidence synthesis and few published examples
currently exists. Design of customized coated dental implants using finite element analysis. This
handout will explain what literature reviews are and offer insights into the form and construction of
literature reviews in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences. QR Codes Generate QR Codes for
your digital content. Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what
you are trying to accomplish with the review. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely
those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. There is advice on our other pages about
thinking critically, reading strategies and academic writing. Scrutinize and question every aspect as
your emphasis is on the originality and profound nature of the research. Short Selling: A Review of
the Literature and Implications for Future We select and review studies within a research framework,
identifying two of the most important areas in the literature: short sellers as important information
intermediaries and short sellers' influence on accounting, auditing, and other corporate decisions as
the 'spillover effect' of the information distribution. But few scientists are trained in how to write a
review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. Here are some questions you can ask yourself
when structuring your literature review according to methodology: Which methodologies have been
utilised in this field. There’re so many frauds out there, so security concerns are healthy concerns.
Consider whether your sources are current Some disciplines require that you use information that is
as current as possible. However, acupuncture studies that address the long-term efficacy or
effectiveness of acupuncture are required, and they must have sufficient sample numbers. Yes, they
are difficult and require a strong degree of comprehension of academic studies. Integrative Review:
This review method is more inclusive than others, allowing for the simultaneous inclusion of
experimental and non-experimental research. Moreover, you should opt only for authoritative books
and articles written by professional researches in the relevant spheres.
Conducting a literature review Focusing on different aspects of your literature review can be useful
to help plan, develop, refine and write it. EDs have high comorbidity with other psychiatric
conditions and are associated with suicidal thoughts and attempts. 4 5 The medical complications
that often accompany EDs involve almost all organ systems and can be life-threatening, 6 leading to
significantly increased mortality rates. 7 Given the negative consequences of EDs, it is imperative
that we understand their prevalence and treatment within and across ethnic groups. Give a thorough
overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the current state
of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what is lacking in
the literature. Within each theme, students can critique key studies and their strengths and
limitations, in order to get a lay of the land and come to a point where they can identify ways to
contribute new insights to the existing academic conversation on their topic. A review is a required
part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and dissertations. Historical
Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. If you have found some recurring
central themes, you can organise your literature review into subsections that address different aspects
of the topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area,
or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.
Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. There are various referencing styles, and non-
compliance with them might affect your grade. Susan Macicak: Linguistics Imelda Vetter: Dell
Medical School For help in other subject areas, please see the guide to library specialists by subject.
Reprints and permissions About this article Cite this article. All studies that had multiple therapeutic
interventions applied in the study groups or those that did not fulfill the criteria of a RCT were
excluded. The Fig. 1 shows the methodologic development of the review and the studies excluded.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. Literature reviews
made by us will serve you as a profitable investment into your future. The purpose is to place
research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify
the likely directions for future research. You can also review the indexes of books to find references
to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. Usually a literature review forms a
section or part of a dissertation, research project or long essay. The extracted data must be presented
in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the extant literature ( Jesson et al., 2011 ).
Webster and Watson (2002) warn researchers that literature reviews should be much more than lists
of papers and should provide a coherent lens to make sense of extant knowledge on a given topic.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7977. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Tortora C, Di
Paola A, Argenziano M, Creoli M, Marrapodi MM, Cenni S, et al. To ensure the search is as
comprehensive as possible, backwards citation chaining of included studies will be used to identify
any additional studies of relevance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European
Conference on Information Systems ( ecis 2009); Verona, Italy. 2009. Webster J., Watson R.T.
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. First, here a wide variety of
disciplines are on offer. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are further detailed below (see table 2 ). A
literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a
specific topic or research question. Studies conducted in non-Western, low-income or middle-income
countries will not be included in this review. Whether you need to write a literature review in a day
or a month, you’ll receive it without the slightest delay. State-of-the-Art Review: This considers the
current level of advancement in a field or topic and makes recommendations for future research
directions. Biomedicines. 2022;10(4):874. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lo
Russo L, Guida L, Mariani P, Ronsivalle V, Gallo C, Cicciu M, et al. Fink, Arlene. Conducting
Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper.