Biochar Research v1
Biochar Research v1
A Research Paper
presented to the Institution Review Committee of
Department of Research, Gusa Regional Science High School - X
In partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
Research 4 for Junior High School
JANUARY 2024
Chapter 1
Introduction
Traditional water treatment methods often rely on synthetic chemicals, leading to concerns
about environmental impact and long-term sustainability. In this context, the quest for
Biochar, a carbon-rich material derived from the pyrolysis of biomass, has garnered
attention for its potential in environmental applications, particularly in soil improvement and
This research focuses on breaking fresh ground in the field of biochar application by
Kangkong, also known as water spinach, is a resilient and fast-growing aquatic plant
that thrives in various climates. Its stems, often considered agricultural waste, possess a
solution: addressing plastic waste concerns and creating a biochar material tailored for
Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework of this study is centered around the pioneering use of
framework encompasses several key dimensions, initiating with the meticulous selection of
kangkong stems as the biomass source for biochar production, influenced by factors such as
employing diverse pyrolysis methods to convert kangkong stems into biochar, characterized
by its physical and chemical properties to discern its composition and potential adsorption
capabilities.
Moving forward, the study delves into the application of kangkong stem-derived
biochar in water treatment, exploring its efficacy in removing various contaminants through
regeneration and reusability are explored to enhance the sustainability of the water treatment
process.
This IPO diagram provides a structured representation of the inputs, processes, and
expected outputs of the study on using kangkong stem-derived biochar for sustainable water
treatment.
impacting ecosystems and human health. Traditional water treatment methods often rely on
plastic waste exacerbates ecological issues. Although biochar has shown promise in water
aquatica) stems as a biomass source for biochar synthesis and their efficacy in advanced
2. What is the resiliency of the usage of the filter over an extended period of time.
The research addresses the growing need for sustainable and environmentally friendly
water treatment solutions. By exploring the efficacy of kangkong biochar, sourced from a
readily available agricultural residue, the study contributes to the development of eco-
conscious methods for water purification. Furthermore, the utilization of kangkong stems not
promotes the valorization of agricultural waste, aligning with principles of circular economy
Additionally, the investigation delves into optimizing biochar application levels, ensuring
practicality and effectiveness in diverse water treatment scenarios. Beyond its immediate
The scope of this study is comprehensive, aiming to investigate the effectiveness and
for water treatment. The research will systematically explore various biochar application
levels to determine the optimal dosage for contaminant removal, considering a range of
concentrations. By delving into the underlying mechanisms, such as adsorption the study will
ensures a clear evaluation of the treated water's overall quality. The study's commitment to an
environmental sustainability assessment, through a life cycle analysis, addresses the broader
ecological implications of the kangkong biochar water treatment approach. Furthermore, the
Additionally, the study recognizes the need for ongoing research to address long-term
applied to water samples, ranging from low to high levels, with specific measured quantities
contaminants, including heavy metals, organic pollutants, and nutrients, in water samples
pH: The measure of hydrogen ion concentration in water samples determined using a pH
meter.
biochar application conditions, including optimal dosage (grams per liter), contact time
to be regenerated and reused for water treatment, assessed through experimental methods that
evaluate the biochar's performance after regeneration techniques, such as heat treatment or
washing.
Chapter II
Review of Related Literature
especially for the removal of heavy metals. In several cases, these studies have established
the superiority of biochars over activated carbons and shown that biochar is an effective
means of removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions. The composition of the feedstock
is one of the main factors influencing the sorption capacity of biochars. The current body of
literature is incorporated into this review in order to comprehend the general sorption
remove heavy metals from biochar depending on the type of biochar. To better understand
how well biochar removes heavy metals and to encourage the use of biochar technology in
water treatment, mathematical sorption models can be employed (Inyang et al., 2016).
metals from wastewater. It has been widely recognized that the adsorption capacity of
biochar toward heavy metals largely depends on biochar characteristics and the nature of the
target metals. Biochar can be an effective material for the absorption of heavy metals due to
the abundance of functional groups on its surface such as phenolic, hydroxyl, and carboxyl
groups, and due to its porous structure and its large surface area. (Enaime et al., 2020).
soil amendment. The approach also presents a unique opportunity to transition from linear
and open-ended material cycles to cyclic closed loops, unlocking multiple co-benefits in
water and sanitation, energy provision, environmental quality, and food and livelihood
treatment of raw materials and post-treatment, are succinctly outlined. Biochar has found
widespread use as an adsorbent for the removal of toxic metals, organic pollutants, and
typically exhibits a larger surface area, enhanced adsorption capacity, or more abundant
surface functional groups (SFG), making it a promising carbon material for diverse
wastewater treatment applications. This critical review, the first of its kind, underscores the
industrial wastewater (such as dye, battery manufacturing, and dairy wastewater), municipal
wastewater, agricultural wastewater, and stormwater. The review also delves into future
application on a larger scale. In summary, the review concludes that biochar technology
innovated and employed for the treatment of contaminated waste and water (W&W). While
technologies centered around biochar (BC) have seen rapid development, predominantly in
laboratory and small-scale settings, only a limited number of these advancements have
successfully transitioned from the laboratory scale to large-scale applications. Several factors
contribute to the slow commercialization of these technologies. This study evaluates the
progress in this field, considering technical, environmental, economic, and social aspects.
According to the findings, certain types of biochar, such as magnetic variants, are presumed
to be sufficiently efficient and economically advantageous, offering the potential for recovery
and reuse, making them most promising for swift commercialization (Kamali et al., 2021).
microbial abundance, the ratio of repeated utilization, and microbial metabolic capacity.
However, research on this method is still in the early stages, with limited focus on
studies are confined to laboratory settings. Challenges persist, including the recovery
difficulty post-use and the potential for secondary pollution due to residual pollutants after
wastewater treatment, comprehensive investigation and analysis are essential (Li et al.,
2022).
Biochar is a promising material for gas storage and separation, soil remediation, and
main focus of this review, which provides an overview of recent research developments on
biochar production and applications. A brief summary of the various biochar production
adsorbent biochar has been widely used to remove nutrients, organic pollutants, and
hazardous metals from wastewater. Engineered or designer biochar, which represents a novel
form of carbon material with excellent application prospects in various wastewater
treatments, typically has a larger surface area, a stronger adsorption capacity, or a higher
abundance of surface functional groups (SFG) than pristine biochar. The review leads to the
conclusion that biochar technology offers a novel, affordable, and ecologically friendly
Since they have such a large impact on ecosystems and public health, emerging
contaminants have recently come to light as novel and serious water pollutants. Novel and
less expensive methods are needed because the current conventional wastewater treatment
that biochar is a powerful adsorbent for eliminating both organic and complex inorganic
pollutants from water. This review offers an overview of current studies on the underlying
mechanisms governing the emergence of contaminants in water, their elimination, and the
presented regarding the application of this resource; it is clear that a variety of cheap,
efficient, modified, and composite biochar that is able to remove emerging contaminants will
Due to the agricultural industry's explosive growth and the release of harmful metals,
pesticides, and antibiotics into farmlands, agricultural contamination is becoming more and
more serious these days. Functional materials based on biochar have been used by numerous
qualities, biochar has also shown to be a very promising and successful technology in the
field of water purification (e.g., cost effective, high specific surface area, and surface reactive
groups). This review aims to discuss the underlying mechanisms and demonstrate the
application and fabrication methods of biochar-based functional materials for the removal of
various agricultural contaminants. But the use of biochar-based functional materials is still in
its infancy. The main obstacles are the lack of quality standards, the immaturity of
engineered biochar production technologies, and the gap between laboratory scale and field
application. Future studies should prioritize funding relevant research in order to close these
Wastewater micropollutants pose risks to human health and the environment. Organic
PAC production is costly and energy-intensive. While carbon can be sequestered and biochar
adsorbents can be less expensive, the overall benefits are dependent on the conditions of
biochar production and treatment capacity. In order to compare the ten environmental effects
of producing and using wood biochar, biosolids biochar, and coal-derived PAC to remove
sulfamethoxazole from wastewater, life cycle assessment was employed in this case.
Moderate capacity wood biochar was found to have better environmental impacts than PAC
in two categories (eutrophication) and better environmental impacts than PAC in four other
energy recovery and carbon sequestration. Due to higher doses of biochar needed to achieve
the treatment goal, low capacity wood biochar performed worse than PAC in five categories,
although it still had even greater benefits for respiratory effects, global warming, and
gas emission-reducing manner. In this study, the use of biochar as substrates in Vertical Flow
Constructed Wetlands (VFCWs) improved the removal of contaminants from low C/N
wastewaters with varying influent strengths. The removal of nitrogen and organic matter in
VFCWs with and without biochar addition, and with different low C/N influent strengths,
was carefully evaluated. With average removal of organic pollutants (85%), NH4+-N (39%),
and TN (39%), combined VFCWs with biochar addition could be a suitable strategy when
results. Meanwhile, N2O emission in VFCWs with biochar added was likewise significantly
The intensive use of biochar can have adverse effects, including potential threats to
food safety and the risk of harming natural ecosystems due to the extensive expansion of
agricultural land for raw material extraction for biochar production. To safeguard against
competition with food production and prevent deforestation, a global transnational integrated
agricultural policy is essential for the sustainable growth of the biochar market. Another
critical concern for the sustainable use of biochar revolves around optimizing the frequency
and cumulative application rates, considering its long-lasting presence in the environment,
aging in soil and its impact on the soil environment need further exploration, as the long-term
effects of these phenomena remain incompletely understood. Finally, while the use of
approach, promoting carbon stabilization in soils due to biochar's low biodegradability and
the physical and chemical attributes of the soil, potentially leading to adverse effects on
microorganism growth in the soil and the cultivation of crops. Research indicates that biochar
migration of pollutants, and impeding the growth of aquatic organisms. The environmental
risks associated with biochar stem from its harmful components, unfavorable surface
Biochars are effective agents for sequestering C in soils. Although hydrochars and
overwhelmingly stabilized against microbial decomposition and hence will persist for
hundreds if not thousands of years in soils. However, the net greenhouse gas (GHG) impact
due to biochar applications to soil is also influenced by changes in net primary crop
organic matter cycling, and emissions of CH4 and N2O. Furthermore, the overall impact of
biochar amendments must also include GHG emissions resulting from biochar production,
water used for irrigation, posing a risk of crop contamination. Additional treatment steps are
likely needed to ensure safe water. However, the study also suggests that biochar filters can
This opens up the possibility of optimizing the design of biochar filters to reduce land
requirements while still achieving similar disinfection levels as traditional sand filters.
Further research is needed to understand the impact of salinity and smaller biochar particles
improve environmental quality through lowering soil nutrient leaching losses, lowering the
emissions, and increasing crop productivity in severely weathered or degraded soils. The
pyrolysis of biomass yields biochar, which could aid in achieving these objectives. The 2010
Division session, "Biochar Effects on the Environment and Agricultural Productivity," was
of using biochar. This specialized session, along with sessions from previous biochar
conferences, such as the 2010 U.S. This special manuscript collection is based on the Biochar
Initiative and the Biochar Symposium 2010.Contributions from individuals address the need
for future biochar research, information gaps that exist now, and ways to improve the body of
knowledge about biochar. The use of biochar has a bright future because it can be tailored for
oxygen to produce biochar, which is used more and more for soil compartmentalization and
other beneficial purposes like carbon sequestration and soil quality improvement. Because of
its high specific surface area and highly carbonaceous composition, biochar is also regarded
amendments may increase adsorption and reduce the amount of contaminants that are
Nevertheless, little is known about the processes influencing the behavior and environmental
fate of organic pollutants, particularly pesticides in soil treated with biochar. It has been
demonstrated that biochar affects the degradation and bioavailability of pesticides for living
organisms, as well as the fate and effects of pesticides. Furthermore, some important facets
of biochar's uses in agriculture and the environment are emphasized (Safaei et al., 2016).
biochar has special qualities like high porosity and sorption capacity, large surface area, and
chemical recalcitrance, it has drawn more attention as an amendment for composting and soil
community structure and chemical properties (nitrogen loss, greenhouse gas emissions,
organic matter decomposition and humification) during the composting of organic wastes is
given in this paper. The use of biochar for the remediation of soils contaminated with heavy
metals and organic pollutants, along with associated mechanisms, are also covered in this
review. Beyond its aging, biochar's effects on the environment, pesticide efficacy, and fate
and sequesters carbon, biochar has shown promise in recent years. Consequently, it might
mitigate the impacts of climate change on a global scale. Certain studies indicate that crop
yields are increased when biochar is added to agricultural soils. Enhanced microbial activity
and plant nutrient status in the soil, enhanced soil aeration and water-holding capacity, and
adjustments to several important soil chemical properties are the processes at work. In this
review, the production, characteristics, and uses of various types of biochar in agriculture are
vary with the feedstock and production conditions ( Laghari et al., 2016)
Applying biochar improves soil fertility and reduces the effects of climate change.
Carbon (C) in the soil can be sequestered and nutrients can be supplied by biochar. Once
applied to soil, the composition of the biochar—which depends on the kind of feedstock and
nutrients. The mineralization of soil C is significantly impacted by biochar, which can either
positively or negatively prime the microorganisms responsible for soil C cycling. Applying
biochar to the soil, however, may occasionally have detrimental effects on both the soil and
the surrounding environment. For example, because biochar reduces soil C mineralization or
plant nutrient uptake, it may reduce crop productivity and soil nutrient availability. Because
negative impact on human health and environmental quality. In this review, we address the
relationship between the composition and function of biochar, assess its contribution to
improved soil fertility and carbon sequestration, and talk about laws and worries about the
harmful effects of biochar on the environment. We also go over future challenges and
Overuse of land puts a great deal of strain on the ecological environment and has a
number of negative effects on the degradation of land function. The practices of farming,
mining, and heavy metal pollution have left soils with numerous detrimental effects. In
recent years, biochar has gained popularity as an environmentally friendly soil enhancer in
the domains of energy, agriculture, and the environment. Biochar has been thoroughly
researched and evaluated for its potential benefits to agriculture and the environment. On the
other hand, reviews of biochar's structures and other uses are scarce. ( Zhang et al., 2021).
Because of its beneficial effects on the environment, biochar has drawn the attention of agriculturalis
Biochar is a porous carbonaceous material formed through the thermochemical
oxygen. Biomass feedstock encompasses a range of organic waste materials, such as crop
residues, forest remnants, wood chips, algae, sewage sludge, manures, and organic municipal
solid wastes (Colantoni et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2019). Various methods, including
and duration parameters (Mohan et al., 2014; González et al., 2017; Fang et al., 2018).
biochar production itself can act as a carbon sink, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions by
stabilizing carbon and preventing its release into the atmosphere during biomass degradation
(Creamer and Gao, 2016; Yang et al., 2018a). Secondly, biochar serves as a cost-effective
and environmentally friendly adsorbent (Cha et al., 2016; Inyang et al., 2016), attributed to
its substantial surface area and the presence of abundant surface functional groups (SFG)
(Wang et al., 2017a; Zhang et al., 2017a). Its versatile applications include metal/metalloid
adsorption for water purification (Agrafioti et al., 2013; Van Vinh et al., 2015; Palansooriya
et al., 2019), soil enhancement for improved fertility and crop productivity (Yoo et al., 2018),
contribution to clean energy production as a partial substitute for fossil fuels (Fang et al.,
2018; Cao et al., 2019), and utilization as an adsorbent and catalyst for various pollutants to
While biochar is primarily used for carbon sequestration and soil improvement, it also
offers potential benefits for water quality. Biochar can reduce soil erosion by improving
various soil properties like aggregate stability and organic matter content. Although the
magnitude varies, several studies suggest it also reduces runoff and nutrient loss in runoff.
Biochar can filter urban runoff, reduce pesticide pollution risks, and even decrease nitrate
leaching. However, its impact on phosphate and dissolved organic carbon leaching requires
further investigation.
The effectiveness of biochar depends on factors like feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature,
and application rate. More long-term field studies are needed to understand its performance
under different conditions. Currently, the high cost of biochar limits its large-scale
application. However, some biochars, such as those from gasification, have minimal cost.
Further research is needed to address challenges like biochar erosion and nutrient adsorption.
Overall, biochar has the potential to improve water quality by reducing erosion, nutrient
leaching, and organic pollutant loss. However, more field-scale data is needed for different
but the difference was only significant for organic matter. Interestingly, vegetated filters were
While corn cob biochar showed slightly better removal efficiencies, no significant
difference was observed between the two types. Nevertheless, corn cob biochar is
recommended due to its ease of production and readily available feedstock. This study
treatment. Its low density and potential reuse in agriculture further add to its appeal.
contaminant removal and explore the potential of higher pyrolysis temperatures for improved
removed from creek water using a biochar filter in conjunction with a biosand filter. At the
start of the experiment, the biochar filter completely removed phenanthrene and anthracene
and significantly removed atrazine and naphthalene. It was found that atrazine removal
decreased with time and was reliant on the pause period/contact time (i.e., the amount of time
atrazine and the biochar in the filter came into contact). Greater removal of atrazine was
achieved with longer pause/contact times; however, no such effect of contact times was seen
removed was noted along the filter column's length, with the least amount of atrazine
removed from water samples collected close to the top being removed. Results of an
investigation into the potential desorption of the chemicals from the biochar media suggested
that atrazine might potentially leach from the biochar. There was no evidence of
compounds from drinking water has been demonstrated to be possible with the use of a
biochar filter, which can be combined with a biosand filter to remove contaminants ( Chan et
al ., 2020).
enter surface water resources (such as rivers and lakes) through urban storm water runoff.
Because of its ability to remove contaminants and particulate matter, the use of filtration
systems has drawn increased attention. Biochar's large surface area and microporous
structure indicate that it will make an excellent adsorbent or filter. This study used a series of
investigate the efficacy of biochar as filter media for the removal of mixed contaminants,
including total suspended solids (TSS), nutrients, heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), and E. coli, a column was built with an inner diameter of 7 cm (2.75
in.) and a length of 61 cm (24 in.). coli] derived from artificial stormwater ( Reddy et
al.,2014).
Applying biochar is thought to be a new tactic for enhancing soil ecosystem services.
The effects of such an application on parameters related to water quality, however, have not
received much attention. The most recent research on the effects of biochar on nitrate
leaching, water erosion, and other sources of pollution is compiled in this paper. According
to published research, applying biochar generally lowers runoff by 5 to 50% and soil loss by
11 to 78%. This suggests that biochar can be useful in reducing water erosion, though the
amount of reduction in erosion varies greatly. It seems that applying biochar in combination
with other organic amendments (such as compost or animal dung) reduces water erosion
more effectively than applying biochar by itself.Enhancing soil characteristics that influence
soil erodibility, such as organic C, hydraulic conductivity, and aggregate stability, is one
major way that biochar can lessen water erosion. This review also shows that biochar has a
mixed effect on phosphate and dissolved C leaching, but it typically reduces nitrate leaching
by 2 to 88%. Furthermore, biochar lowers pesticide losses, adsorbs pollutants, and efficiently
While biochar filters were effective in removing yeast from diluted wastewater under
on-farm conditions, they were largely unsuccessful in removing bacteria and viruses. This
suggests that biochar alone may not be sufficient as a sole treatment method for irrigation
water due to potential contamination risks. The study identified the particle diameter of the
biochar as a key factor influencing its effectiveness. Finer biochar particles (1.4mm)
consistently removed more microbes than larger particles, likely due to increased micropore
density and improved contact time between pathogens and adsorption sites.
Other parameters like organic loading rate, electrical conductivity, and microbial
loading rate had no significant impact on microbe removal. This highlights the need for
further research on the influence of higher salinity and even smaller biochar particle sizes.
Despite the limitations, the study also suggests that the current design HLR for biochar filters might be overl
GAC filtration creates an environment favorable for new particle formation, leading
to higher particle levels in the treated water. These particles are enriched with metallic
elements, especially in the larger size fractions (> 3 μm). The element ratio within particles
also increases with size, ranging from 1 to 40. Larger particles, particularly those exceeding
10 μm, exhibit higher organic carbon content and THM formation potential, suggesting a
potential link between particle-bound organic carbon and THM formation. Notably, the bulk
of carbon fines is found in the >10 μm size range. Disinfection efficiency is higher for free
bacteria compared to bacteria attached to particles, indicating that residual attached bacteria
This study investigated the stability and function of bacterial communities within a
bio-activated carbon (BAC) filter used for water treatment. The bacterial community reached
a stable state after 240 days of operation, highlighting the importance of community stability
for efficient pollutant removal. Four dominant bacterial species were identified:
Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., Sphingomonas sp., and Acinetobacter sp. These bacteria were
shown to biodegrade 36 out of 41 organic chemicals present in the water, utilizing them as
This research provides valuable insights into the microbial communities responsible for
pollutant removal in BAC filters, paving the way for further development and application of
This research examined the biological colonization of new GAC filters, highlighting
its practical and theoretical implications. From a practical perspective, the findings indicate
that colonization takes over three months, which is crucial information for water producers.
While the study shows that significant biodegradable organic carbon removal is maintained
during colonization, the early phase releases more bacteria than mature filters. This
Interestingly, even adsorption-based filters experience early colonization and likely release
The high bacterial release during early colonization also holds important theoretical
implications. It suggests a selection process for bacteria that can attach and form films on the
GAC surface. This process explains why colonization takes so long. While the exact
mechanisms are not fully understood, the research suggests that protozoan grazing plays a
major role in controlling bacterial biomass after the initial colonization phase. This
Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the complex biological processes
occurring within GAC filters. It highlights the practical considerations for water producers
during the colonization phase and offers a framework for further research into the microbial
communities and their roles in maintaining filter performance (Servais et al., 1994).
This study investigated two techniques for improving the removal of smaller natural
organic matter (NOM) fractions during drinking water treatment. The findings showed that
removing NOM. This was evident in its superior removal of UV254, a measure of NOM
concentration, and individual humic fractions. Notably, GAC filtration removed an additional
23.4% of NOM measured as UV254, further increased the removal of the high-molecular-
weight (HMW) precursor of trihalomethanes (THMs), and potentially reduced the low-
Overall, this study presents GAC filtration as a promising approach for achieving superior
removal of smaller NOM fractions in drinking water treatment, improving water quality and
drinking water treatment. The study presented in Table 2 outlines the microbial compositions
lacked genus-level identification for most Alphaproteobacteria, but by day 160, a significant
Sphingomonas is commonly found not only in drinking water biofilters but also in
drinking water and biofilms. This genus is known for its ability to degrade various
chemical degradation. Similarly, the presence of Bradyrhizobium, found in BAC filters and
drinking water biofilms, has been linked to the biodegradation of environmental pollutants.
organic carbon (DOC) and assimilable organic carbon (AOC) in the overall biofiltration
system. The pilot-scale BAC filtration system effectively reduces DOC and AOC, with
microbial community structures evolving over time. Further research is needed to understand
Under optimal conditions for addressing turbidity and color, the conventional water treatment process involv
In pre-oxidation using chlorine (Cl2 mg L1/1 h) followed by coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and sa
In the disinfection phase (chlorination) of sand-filtered water without pre-oxidation, DCF
was reduced by about 35% and 97% for contact times of 30 minutes and 24 hours,
respectively. Chlorine proved to be an effective oxidant under the studied conditions, but
the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration remained comparable to that in synthetic
water.
Among the treatment stages investigated, the most substantial removal of DCF occurred through adso
water treatment and assessing their (eco)toxicological effects. Future research should focus
The average Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) content per cell, a measure of metabolic activity, ranged
High-Energy Sonication (HES) treatment was found to be more effective than Low-
Energy Sonication (LES) for biomass removal from GAC, reducing cultivability without
affecting free ATP concentration. Modeling suggested over 90% removal of attached
biomass with a series of six to eight HES treatments. The study also emphasized that ATP
concentrations in GAC filters cover a wide range and are influenced by factors such as
running time and ozone pretreatment. The concentrations of active biomass on GAC,
calculated for the total accessible surface, are in a similar range as biofilms in distribution
CHAPTER 3
Methodology
Research Design
The proposed research design for the study on the effectiveness and environmental
Experimental Research Design. The study will utilize a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
approach, where water samples will be randomly assigned to different levels of kangkong
systematically manipulated to assess its impact on contaminant removal efficiency and water
quality parameters. A control group, consisting of untreated water samples, will serve as a
baseline for comparison, allowing the isolation of specific effects attributed to the biochar
treatment.
Research Setting
This research utilizes the equipment inside the Chemistry Lab in GRSHS-X for
creating the biochar. The equipment that the researchers used is the for turning the kangkong
stems into biochar. The process may take several hours to complete. After that, the
researchers took the biochar and conducted on the polluted waters in. This observation took
Sampling Procedure
The procedure used in the observations involves randomized sampling. With this, the
researchers can generalize their findings and can give unbiased data for easier analysis. The
researchers chose this procedure for its simplicity and the fact that the data gathered is rather
alike.
Data Analysis
After the data was gathered, the researchers used T-Test to analysis the effectiveness
of kangkong biochar.