Scribd
Upload
45 views2 pages

Phys Sci 1. Atomic Structures Rubrics 1.1

The document provides instructions for an assignment to trace the development of atomic models from ancient Greek philosophers to modern scientists like Niels Bohr and Erwin Schrodinger. Students are asked to research a specific atomic model, explain its structure and contributions to understanding the atom, and present their findings. The assignment will be evaluated based on historical understanding of atomic development, structural analysis of the modeled atom, and creativity or originality in the presentation.

Uploaded by

jooshmarkhen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
45 views2 pages

Phys Sci 1. Atomic Structures Rubrics 1.1

The document provides instructions for an assignment to trace the development of atomic models from ancient Greek philosophers to modern scientists like Niels Bohr and Erwin Schrodinger. Students are asked to research a specific atomic model, explain its structure and contributions to understanding the atom, and present their findings. The assignment will be evaluated based on historical understanding of atomic development, structural analysis of the modeled atom, and creativity or originality in the presentation.

Uploaded by

jooshmarkhen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Unveiling the Atom's Secrets!

Level 1

Name:___________________Yr/Strand/Sec:______________Date:______________

Subject:__________________ Instructor:______________

OBJECTIVES:

 Enumerate the contributions of the scientists in the development of the atomic theory;
 Discuss the structure of an atom; and
 Determine the number of sub – atomic particle of each model.

Challenge: Step into the shoes of a renowned scientist on the cutting edge of atomic research!
Your mission is to investigate a specific historical atomic model and develop a captivating
presentation to explain its strengths, limitations, and impact on our understanding of the atom.

General Instructions:
1. Using the table below, trace the development of the atom. The columns must contain the
following information:
a. COLUMN B – name of the atomic model
b. COLUMN C – SHORT description of the atomic model
c. COLUMN D – illustration of the atomic model

2. REFRAIN from DIRECTLY copying and pasting information from the internet. Make sure to
rephrase your statements based on your own understanding. You can refer to our notes and
discussions in the class.

HISTORY OF THE ATOM

NAME OF NAME OF THE DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATION


SCIENTIST ATOMIC MODEL THE ATOMIC
MODEL

1. Democritus

2. John Dalton

3. JJ Thompson

4. Ernest
Rutherford

5. James Chadwick

6. Niels Bohr

7. Erwin
Schrodinger
Rubrics for Performance task 1.1

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Needs No


Improvement output

Demonstrates Shows adequate Demonstrates Shows minimal


comprehensive understanding limited understanding of
knowledge of of the historical understanding the historical
the historical context and key of the historical context or key
context and key figures. Explains context or key figures. Provides
figures the model's figures. Explains inaccurate or
surrounding the development the model's incomplete
chosen model. and features development explanations of
Historical Provides with some and features the model's
Understanding accurate and accuracy, but inconsistently or development
detailed may lack depth with significant and features.
explanations of or contain inaccuracies.
the model's minor
development inaccuracies.
and key
features. 1-9 points
10-14 points No
15-19 points
20 points
points

Clearly Provides a Explains the Provides a vague


deconstructs the decent model's or inaccurate
model's explanation of structure explanation of
structure, using the model's inconsistently or the model's
visuals and structure, with with structure. Lacks
explanations to some visuals or inaccuracies. visuals or
accurately explanations. May lack visuals explanations.
depict the Shows a or explanations. Offers minimal
Structural arrangement moderate Demonstrates understanding of
Analysis and interaction understanding limited the forces and
of subatomic of the forces understanding principles
particles. and principles of the involved.
Demonstrates a involved. underlying
strong grasp of forces and
the forces and principles.
principles
governing the
model. 10-14 points 1-9 points No
20 points 15-19 points points

Goes beyond Shows some Offers minimal Lacks any


the basic creativity and to no additional evidence of
requirements, originality in the insights or creativity or
incorporating presentation or originality originality.
additional analysis, but beyond the
research, unique may not fully basic
perspectives, or explore their requirements.
Creativity &
innovative ideas. potential.
Originality
Presents
findings in a
highly original
and engaging
way.
6-8 points 1-5 points No
10 points 7-9 points
points

Total Score

You might also like