Week1-2 Syllabus, Intro, Structure, Deformation
Week1-2 Syllabus, Intro, Structure, Deformation
of Materials
Syllabus and introduction
General Information
▪Course: ME 569 Mechanical Behavior of Materials
▪Prerequisites:
MSE 230 – Structure and Properties of Materials
Student are recommended to take ME 323
before ME569 course
▪Number of credits: 3 credits
▪Contact Hours: 3 hrs Lecture
▪Textbook/material required:
Textbook: N.E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Eng. Methods
for Deformation, Fracture and Fatigue 4th ed., Pearson, 2012.
Course Content:
Course Objectives
The course is a combination and continuation of structure and
properties of materials and mechanics of materials. It will help
student to design parts from different materials by a better
understanding of materials behavior such as failure, elastic
response and plastic deformation. The course will help students
to explore the mechanics of composite materials and apply it in
the design of these new materials.
Learning Outcomes
Students who successfully complete the course will be able to:
• Explain the concepts of elastic, plastic, fatigue, fracture and creep behavior of materials
• Solve basic problems of finding stresses under various loading conditions
• Explain the plane strain, plane stress and 3D stress state concepts, and evaluate the principal
stresses and strains
• Explain various failure theories for brittle and ductile materials and evaluate the conditions for
failure
• Explain various defects in materials and the factors affecting the mechanical and failure behavior
• Use the concept of linear elastic fracture mechanics, and estimate the effect of cracks in materials
and structures
• Explain the concept of fracture toughness and its use in engineering design
• Evaluate fracture toughness from various methods
• Explain the concepts of stress based fatigue, strain based fatigue, and fatigue crack-growth
• Evaluate fatigue life for materials using various methods
• Compare the mechanical, fatigue and fracture properties of materials
• Predict the fatigue failure properties of structures and materials
• Explain creep and stress rupture concepts for materials
• Analyze structures for stresses and deformations and predict failures
Student Evaluation
Student Evaluation
WEEK SEVEN Fracture mechanics Chapter8 SO-6
(24 MAR – 30 MAR)
30 MAR - MIDTERM EXAMS BEGIN
WEEK EIGHT
MIDTERM EXAMS WEEK
(31 MAR – 6 APR)
DAY1: Chap.5: Fatigue and crack-growth
behavior
WEEK FOURTEEN
DAY2: PROJECT PRESENTATION
(12 MAY – 18 MAY)
PRESENTATIONS
REVISION FOR FINAL EXAM
WEEK FIFTEEN
(19 MAY – 25 MAY) 19 MAY - CHANGE OF MAJORS APPLICATION OPENS
23 MAY - CHANGE OF MAJORS APPLICATION CLOSES / CLASSES END
• Deformation failure
– Change of physical dimension which is sufficient for its function to be lost
• Fracture
– Crack to the extent that a component is separated more than two pieces
Definitions
• Strength is simply the stress that causes a deformation or
fracture failure.
• Ductility is a measure of a material's ability to undergo
significant plastic deformation before rupture.
• Elasticity is the ability of an object or material to resume its
normal shape after being stretched or compressed.
• Hardness is a measure of the resistance to localized plastic
deformation induced by either mechanical indentation or
abrasion.
• Toughness is the ability of a metal to deform plastically and to
absorb energy in the process before fracture
• Brittleness: A material is brittle if, when subjected to stress, it
breaks with little elastic deformation and without significant
plastic deformation.
• Stiffness is the extent to which an𝐹object resists deformation in
response to an applied force. k=
1 Types Of Material Failure
Figure 1.2 Stress‐Strain curve with elastic deformation, and elastic + plastic
deformation
1 Types Of Material Failure
1.1 Elastic and Plastic Deformation
• Ductile behavior: sustaining large amount of plastic deformation
– Low‐strength steel, copper, lead, plastics, and polyethylene
• Brittle behavior: fracture without much plastic deformation
– Glass, stone, acrylic plastic, high‐strength steel
• Low carbon steel
– 0.05~0.3% carbon, Ultimate=750MPa, Young’s modulus=200GPa
– Cheap, good machinability(welding), structural steel, plate, pipe, bolt, nut
• High carbon steel
– 0.9~2% carbon, Ultimate=1000MPa, Young’s modulus=200GPa
– High tensile strength, tool steel, crank shaft, wheel, rail, spring
Figure 1.8 Development of a fatigue crack during rotating bending of a Figure 1.11 Fuselage failure in a passenger jet that
precipitation‐hardened aluminum alloy. Photographs at various numbers of occurred in 1988.
cycles are shown for a test requiring 400,000 cycles for failure
Part 2
Design and Material Selection
2 Design and Materials Selection
Figure 1.13 Road simulation test of an automobile, with loads applied at all four wheels and the bumper mounts
Part 3
Economic Importance of Fracture
3 Economic Importance of Fracture
Figure 2.2 Size scales and disciplines involved in the study and use of engineeringmaterials.
4.1 Introduction
Engineering Materials
4.1 Introduction
Metal and Allows
4.1 Introduction
Ceramics
4.1 Introduction
Polymers
4.1 Introduction
Composite
4.1 Introduction
Engineering Materials
• Primary bond
– Strong, atomic force
– Ionic, covalent, metallic bond
• Secondary bond
– Weak, molecular force
– Occur due to electro‐staticdipole
– Van der Waals, hydrogen bond (electrostatic attraction)
4.2 Bonding in Solids
4.2.1 Chemical Bonding in Solids
• Ionic bond
– Transfer(donation and acceptance) of valence electrons
– Insulator in solid state, brittle, crystalline structure, high meltingtemp.
• Covalent bond
– Share of valence electrons betweenatoms
– Single/double/triple bond, liquid or gas at roomtemperature
• Metallicbond
– Donate outer shell valence electrons to cloud of electrons
– Heat/electro conductive, high ductility andmalleability
Figure 2.3 The three types of primary chemical bond. Electrons are transferred in ionic bonding, as in NaCl; shared in
covalent bonding, as in water; and given up to a common “cloud” in metallic bonding, as in magnesium metal.
4.2 Bonding in Solids
4.2.1 Chemical Bonding in Solids
Figure 2.4 Three‐dimensional crystal Figure 2.5 Diamond cubic crystal structure of carbon. As a result of the strong and
structure of NaCl, consisting of two directional covalent bonds, diamond has the highest melting temperature, the highest
interpenetrating FCCstructures. hardness, and the highest elastic modulus E, of all known solids.
4.2 Bonding in Solids
4.2.3 Secondary Bonds
• Permanent dipole bond
– Dipole formed cause attraction between adjacentmolecules
– Hydrogen bond is stronger than other dipole bond
• Van der Waals bond (known to be a fluctuating dipole bond)
– Sum of force between molecules due to covalent bonds, especially force
between two instantaneously induced dipoles
Figure 2.7 Oxygen‐to‐hydrogen secondary bonds Figure 2.8 Hydrogen‐to‐chlorine secondary bonds
between water (H2O) molecules. between chain molecules in polyvinylchloride.
4.3 Structure in Crystalline Materials
4.3.1 Basic Crystal Structures
• Grain in metal/ceramic, non‐crystalline structure in glass, chain like molecules
in polymer
• Unit cell: the smallest group of atomic arrangement incrystals
The General Features of the Seven Basic Unit Cells The lengths of the edges of the unit cells are indicated by a, b, and c, and the
angles are defined as follows: α, the angle between b and c; β, the angle between a and c; and γ, the angle between a and b.
4.3 Structure in Crystalline Materials
4.3.1 Basic Crystal Structures
• Crystal structure: arrangement of atom for a given unit cell
– BCC, FCC is common inmetals
– HCP: 2 parallel plane(basal plane), 3 additional atoms at center plane
– Change its structure with temperature and pressure; iron phase, annealing
The three kinds of cubic unit cells, (a)simple cubic or Primitive Cubic(PC), Hexagonal close‐packed(HCP) crystal structure
(b)Body‐Centered Cubic(BCC), and (c)Face‐CenteredCubic(FCC) ‐ Alumina(Al2O3)
4.3 Structure in Crystalline Materials
4.3.2 Complex Crystal Structures
• Compounds have more complex crystal structures than elemental materials., due
to the necessity of accommodating more than one type of atom and to the
directional aspect of even partially covalent bonds.
• Some with an one of the basic crystal structures like a diamond cubic structure of
silicon carbide(SiC) with FCC and Al2O3 with a hexagonal unit cell.
• Mostceramic has complex crystal structure (semi‐crystalline, amorphous)
• Polymer has amorphous or chain like structure
Figure 2.16 Variation with distance of the attractive, repulsive, and total forces between atoms. The slope dP/dx at the
equilibrium spacing xe is proportional to the elastic modulus E; the stress σb, corresponding to the peak in total force, is the
theoretical cohesive strength.
4.4 Elastic Deformation and Theoretical Strength
4.4.3 Theoretical Strength
4.5 Inelastic Deformation
4.5.1 Plastic Deformation
• Elastic deformation involves the stretching of chemicalbonds.
• Plastic deformation rearranges the atoms after the deformation is complete.
• Single crystals of pure metals with macroscopic size yield in shear at very low stress
than theory (i.e., τ0 = G/3,000) due toimperfections
• Plastic deformation occurs by motion of dislocations under shear stress
• Oneatom at a time rather than simultaneously
• Change neighbors and return to stable state after dislocation has passed
Figure 2.24 Ultimate tensile strengths for irons and steels in various
forms. Note that steels are mostly composed of iron and contain small
to moderate amounts of otherelements.
• The study of deformation and fracture in materials is
called mechanical behavior of materials.
The most basic concern in design to avoid structural failure is
that the stress in a component must not exceed the strength of
the material, where the strength is simply the stress that
causes a deformation or fracture failure.
Additional complexities or particular causes of failure often
require further analysis, such as the following:
1. Stresses are often present that act in more than one
direction; that is, the state of stress is biaxial or triaxial.
2. Real components may contain flaws or even cracks that
must be specifically considered.
3. Stresses may be applied for long periods of time.
4. Stresses may be repeatedly applied and removed, or
the direction of stress repeatedly reversed.
Poll Question
A
B
Buckling
is a failure mode characterized by a sudden and
sometimes unexpected failure of a structural member
subjected to high compressive loads
64
Buckling
Material is still elastic but it cant withstand load anymore
65
Buckling is an important design criterion in the design of
compressively loaded thin-walled structures e.g. storage
tanks, submarines and space rockets
66
Mode of Failure
Structural members which carry compressive loads may
be divided into two broad categories
–Short, thick members fail by crushing
–Long, slender members fail by buckling instability
67
Short columns subjected to axial loads will ‘fail’ due to crushing when the stress reaches
the yield stress or ultimate stress of the material, depending on the definition of failure
•Slender columns or struts, i.e. members in which cross-section dimensions are small
compared to length, may fail due to ‘buckling’ i.e. ‘elastic instability’ –Fig. (a)
68
Ideally no lateral deflection of the column would occur with
increase in load P
(a) (b)
69
Solution techniques for buckling of axially loaded members
70
Stable or Unstable?
71
If the two rods and the two forces P and P’ are perfectly
aligned, the system will remain in the position of equilibrium,
Fig. (a), as long as it is not disturbed.
72
To determine whether the two-rod system is stable or
unstable, consider the forces acting on rod AC.
If CC > M then the system will tend to move away from its
original equilibrium position; the system is unstable.
The value of the load P for which the two moments balance
each other, CC = M, is called the critical load Pcr and given by
73
Try this one now?
Σ𝑀 = 0 → Pcr = KL
74
Determine the critical buckling load for the column. The
material can be assumed rigid.
75
Rigid bars AB and BC are pin connected at B. If the spring at D
has a stiffness k, determine the critical load Pcr for the system.
76
Euler buckling load
77
Applying the elastic beam differential equation gives
78
The solution of the differential equation
is y = A cos nx + B sin nx
Boundary conditions:
–y = 0 at x = 0
–y= 0 at x = L
•Hence A = 0 giving y = B sin nx and
0 = B sin nL
79
Now B cannot equal 0 since y is not zero.
Hence sin nL = 0.
This value of Pcr is termed the ‘Euler buckling load’ for the column
80
Try this one now?
81
Show that a pin-ended strut of circular cross-section will yield
before it buckles if the ratio of length to diameter is less than
22.5. Use the values for E and sy in the table.
Solution:
Two scenarios are possible, buckling of the column and its yielding.
2
𝑙 103 𝑙 𝑙
= 𝜋 2 × 206 × = 2031 ⇒ = 45 ⇒ = 22.5
𝑟 1000 𝑟 𝑑
82
Creep of Materials
83
Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Creep Behavior
Creep is a time-dependent and permanent deformation of materials
when subjected to a constant load at a high temperature (>0.4Tm).
Examples: turbine blades, stream generators.
84
A typical creep curve
Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Stages of Creep
• Primary/transient creep.
• Secondary/steady-state
creep.
• Tertiary creep.
Stage I: As soon as the load is applied, there is an instantaneous elastic response, followed by (c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used herein under license.
έ=Δε/Δt
Stage III: The strain rate may increase again (stage III), accelerating until
failure occurs.
85
Mechanical Behavior of Materials Decreasing temperature and stress
lead to slower creep rates, but failure often
occurs at a lower strains.
Creep Behavior
86
Mechanical Behavior of Materials
87
With Newtonian viscosity, the rate of strain,
γ˙, is proportional to the stress, τ
γ˙ = τ/η,
viscosity
𝜀. = σ/η’
η' = 3η
88
Grain boundary sliding is not the only mechanism
89
Diffusion mechanism
Nabarro-Herring creep
If the creep occurs by diffusion through the lattice, it is called
Nabarro-Herring
creep.
lattice diffusivity
90
Coble creep
91
Dislocation motion
92
Multiple mechanisms
93
94
Other terminologies
95
Other terminologies
96
Mechanical Behavior of Materials
Creep Behavior
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning™ is a trademark used
herein under license.
Results from a series of creep tests. (a) Stress-rupture curves for an iron-
chromium-nickel alloy and (b) the Larson-Miller parameter for ductile cast iron
97