Scribd
Upload
34 views

1.topic G08

The document presents a conceptual model that examines the influence of entrepreneurial orientation, knowledge management, and social capital on innovation capacity. The model proposes that entrepreneurial orientation has a direct effect on innovation capacity (H1) and an indirect effect through knowledge management (H4) and social capital (H3). Knowledge management is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and innovation capacity (H5). Social capital is also proposed to mediate this relationship (H6). The model and hypotheses are based on a review of 30 references on entrepreneurship, knowledge management, and innovation.

Uploaded by

palija shakya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
34 views

1.topic G08

The document presents a conceptual model that examines the influence of entrepreneurial orientation, knowledge management, and social capital on innovation capacity. The model proposes that entrepreneurial orientation has a direct effect on innovation capacity (H1) and an indirect effect through knowledge management (H4) and social capital (H3). Knowledge management is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and innovation capacity (H5). Social capital is also proposed to mediate this relationship (H6). The model and hypotheses are based on a review of 30 references on entrepreneurship, knowledge management, and innovation.

Uploaded by

palija shakya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

The Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Knowledge

Management on innovation

Social Capital

H2 H5

Knowledge Innovation
Management
H1 H4
Capacity

Entrepreneurial H6
H3
Orientation

Figure 1 Conceptual Model of the Study H5 & H6: Mediating effects

1
2
3
4
5
References

1. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of


Management. 17: 99-120.
2. Bishop, P. & Crookell, H. H. (1986). Specialization in Canadian subsidiaries. In D.G.
McFetridge (ed.) Canadian Industry in Transition. Toronto: University of Toronto
Press. 305-386.
3. Bedeski, R.E. (1998). The Indigenous Dynamic in Taiwan’s Postwar Development:
The Religious and Historical Roots of Entrepreneurship: Book Reviews. Pacific
Affairs. 71(3): 418.
4. Covin, J. G. & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile
and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal. 10(1): 75.
5. Franken,A & Braganza, A (2006) Organizational forms and Knowledge management:
One Size fits all, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 1 (2)
18-37.
6. Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is the entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. American
Journal of Small Business. 12: 11-32.
7. Ghoshal, S. & Barlett, C. A. (1989). Managing across borders. The transnational
solution. Boston.
8. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An
organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems.
18(1): 185-214.
9. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic
Management Journal. 17: 109-122.
10. Gronhaug, K. and G. Kaufmann, Eds. (1988). Innovation: A cross disciplinary
perspective. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
11. He, Z. L. & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the
ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science. 15(4): 481-494.
12. Hurley, R. F. & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and
organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of
Marketing. 62(3): 42-54.
13. Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1993). SPSS LISREL 8: Users reference guide.
Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
14. Kale, P., Singh, H. & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary
assets and strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management
Journal. 21: 217-237.
15. Knol, W. H. C. & Stroeken, J. H. M. (2001). The diffusion and adoption of
information technology in small- and medium-sized enterprises through IT
scenarios. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 13(2): 227.
16. Lane, P. J. & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and
interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal. 19(5): 461- 471.
17. Liao, J., Welsch, H. & Stoica, M. (2003). Organizational absorptive capacity and
responsiveness: An empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs.

6
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 28(1): 63.
18. Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation
construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review. 21(1):
135-38.
19. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms.
Management Science. 29: 770-791.
20. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, intellectual capital, and the
organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review. 23(2): 242-266.
21. Ozsomer, A. & Gencturk, E. (2003). A resource-based model of marketing learning
in the subsidiary: the capabilities of exploration and exploitation. Journal of
International Marketing. 11(3): 1-29.
22. Ring, P. S. & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative
interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review. 19: 90-118.
23. Rumelt, R. P. (1987). Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. In: Teece, D.J. (Ed.),
The Competitive Challenge. Ballinger: Cambridge, MA. 137-158.
24. Subramani, M. (2004). How do suplier’s benefit from information technology use in
supply chain relationship? MIS Quarterly, 28(1): 45-73.
25. Teece, D. J. (2000). Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm
Structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning. 33: 35-54.
26. Teece, J. D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic
management. Strategic Management Journal. 18(7):509-533.
27. Tsai, W, & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital and value creation: The role of
intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal. 41(4): 464-476.
28. Weerawerdana, J. & O’Cass, A. (2004). Exploring the characteristics of the
market-driven firms and antecedents to sustained competitive advantage. Industrial
Marketing Management. 33(5): 419-28
29. Westlund, H. (2003). Implications of Social Capital for business in the knowledge
economy: Theoretical considerations. International Forum on Economic Implication
of Social Capital.
30. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E. & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social Capital, knowledge
acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic
Management Journal. 22(6): 587

7
8

You might also like