Klopper 2006
Klopper 2006
To cite this article: DIRK KLOPPER (2006) Critical Fictions in JM Coetzee's Boyhood
and Youth , Scrutiny2: Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa, 11:1, 22-31, DOI:
10.1080/18125441.2006.9684199
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising
out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Critical Fictions
in. JM Coetzee's Boyhood and Youth
DIRK KLOPPER
Department ofEnglish
University of Stellenbosch
[email protected]
Downloaded by [Nova Southeastern University] at 05:06 31 December 2014
ABSTRACT
Thispaperexplores the way in which Coetzee's Boyhood (1997) and Youth (2002) inter-
rogate the conventions of self-representation in autobiographical writing. It begins by
drawing attention to how Coetzee sees the question of subject, truth and writing as a
concernthat runsthrough all hisworks, suggesting that autobiography isnota privileged
genre in presenting the truth of the subject, and then looks at contemporary theoretical
studies of autobiography to show how this genreis ambiguously located at the limits of
selfand other, present and past, narration and historiography.The paperargues that Boy-
hood and Youth accentuate the liminality ofautobiographical writing and engagewiththe
discursive construction of the subject, interrogating the determinants of autobiographical
writing structurally, through experimentation with the form of the genre, and thematically,
through reflections on the relationship between subjectivity and language.
Because thebasic movement ofself-reflexiveness isa ship between protagonist, narrator and author,
doubting and questioning movement, it is in the nat- these works interrogate the conventions of self-
ure ofthetruth told to itself by thereflecting self not to representation in the very act of self-disclosure. 1
befinal.
JMCoetzee
Confession and double thoughts
of truth. Next, he maintains that autobiography On the one hand, the subject is divided between
is simply one way of writing the subject, no the narrator and the protagonist, the subject
different in this respect from criticism or fiction, who speaks and the subject who is spoken, and,
because, whatever the topic or genre of writing, on the other hand, the subject is displaced from
the subject is constituted in the very process of the immediate present, the "now" of the writing
writing. Then, he ascribes different modes of process, to an irretrievable past, the "then" of
truth to the act of writing, what he would later what has been.
identify in his essay "Fictions of the truth",
which deals specifically with autobiography, as For Louis Renza (1980: 274), the division and
"historical truth" and "poetic truth" (2000).2 displacement of the subject in autobiography
Finally, having implicated the subject in diverse means that "the autobiographical enterprise
kinds of writing, and having posited varieties of occludes the writer's own continuity with the
truth in the writing of the subject, he concludes T being conveyed through his narrative perfor-
with misgivings that the subject can ever be fully mance". Autobiographical writing, says Renza,
accessible, whether in autobiography or else- evinces "a split intentionality", with the "T
where. becoming a 'he' " (1980: 279). Because this split
intentionality is integral to the genre, "the
Beyond the specific significance Coetzee project of writing oneself to oneself is always
attributes to the notions of subject, truth and at the beginning, is always propaedeutic in
writing, he seems also to be alluding to the structure" (1980: 279). This concern with meth-
interrelationship of fiction, criticism and auto- od, with the rhetoric of writing the self,
biography in his work.' If, as he claims, his ineluctably pushes autobiography in the direc-
criticism and fiction present versions of the self, tion of narrative fiction.
it is likely that his autobiographies, which at the
time of the interview were still to be written, Two conceptions emerge from these theore-
would provide varieties of critical fiction. This is tical reflections. First, autobiographical writing
borne out by the versions of autobiography that is ambiguously located at the limits of self and
have now been published, which contest their other, present and past, narration and historio-
own generic boundaries, drawing attention to graphy. Second, and more elusively, the genre of
the ambiguities of a form of writing that, as autobiographical writing is prior to the actual
John Sturrock points out (1993: 21), is con- writing of autobiography, for autobiography as
ventionally regarded as validated by a "meta- such presupposes an engagement with the
physics of presence". conditions of possibility of autobiography's
representations of self. These conceptions are narrator and protagonist.' At the same time,
useful in elucidating Coetzee's project in Boy- however, the gap between narrator and prota-
hood and Youth. Both works accentuate the gonist is narrowed by the use of free indirect
liminality of autobiographical writing, and both speech. The narrator projects the consciousness
works engage with the discursive construction of of each of his protagonists, their intimate
the subject. In them, Coetzee interrogates the thought patterns and characteristic vocabulary
determinants of autobiographical writing struc- and phrasing, by deploying a linguistic style and
turally, through experimentation with the form register appropriate to the pre-adolescent and
of the genre, and thematically, through reflec- young adult respectively. With few instances of
tions on the relationship between subjectivity reported speech, the world is apprehended
and language. almost exclusively through their interior dis-
course." This impression of immediacy, of
having access to the mind itself, to its moods
Downloaded by [Nova Southeastern University] at 05:06 31 December 2014
on the one hand, that Coetzee is engaged in phies deal, after all, with the life of the writer,
these works in theoretical reflection on auto- with the formation, that is, of the aesthetic
biographical form, and, on the other, that these consciousness. In this respect, there is a close
works establish a close relationship between intertextual relationship between the making of
fiction and truth. Yet, contrary to what Colling- the artist in Coetzee's fictional autobiography
wood-Whittick seems to suggest, there is noth- and in James Joyce's autobiographical fiction.'!
ing incidental about the latter. Indeed, the Hermione Lee (2002: 15), for example, claims
works highlight the paradox of creating a kind that the alienated and high-minded Stephen
of truth through the medium of fiction precisely Dedalus of A portrait of the artist as a young
through the self-reflexivity afforded by the man "looms over" Youth. Margaret Lenta
unconventional narrative structure. The choice (2003: 161-162) enlarges on the parallels by
of narrative devices simultaneously foregrounds citing the problematic relationship with family,
the constructedness of the subject in the third- avoidance of commitment to nationalist ideol-
person singular, and presents the immediacy of ogies, solitary artistic aspiration, and self-
this subject's consciousness in the simple pre- imposed exile. Coetzee's autobiographical
sent-tense, resulting in an autobiography that is works evince a similar preoccupation with
both removed from and close to the subject, and language, with forms of signification, and with
that, in drawing attention to its fictional the way in which the subject is interpellated by
strategies, opens up a space for reflection on the symbolic. This thematic preoccupation with
the truth claims of the imagination. the subject of language, specifically as regards
aesthetic language, will be examined in some
Finally, in addition to narrative continuity, detail in what follows.
perspective and voice, there is the question of
style. Like Collingwood-Whittick, Derek At- In Boyhood, reflection on language occurs
tridge sees Boyhood and Youth as investigating primarily in the context of the difference
the nature of autobiographical truth. Claiming between English and Afrikaans, not simply as
that the truth in question is not of a "historical, formal sign systems but as ways of being in the
factual kind" (2005: 149), he argues that Coet- world, ways of constituting subjectivity and
zee's autobiographical works do not so much establishing inter-subjective relations. Given the
"refer" to the truth as "produce" it, rendering context of the 1950s and the rise of Afrikaner
the autobiographical confession "a variety of nationalism, Afrikaans is experienced, from the
literature, perhaps even a variety of fiction" point of view of the English speaker, as the
(2005: 145). For Attridge, evidence of the way in language of the oppressor, and is associated
with conformity and intolerance. However, it is exists in his soul as an "unsubstantial image"
also associated with a kind of freedom, a and in whose presence he will be transfigured
playfulness and flexibility of expression (Coet- into something "impalpable", creating an am-
zee 1997: 81). Trying to come to terms with this biguous play of mental representation and
contradictory language, as well as the fact that corporeal body (Joyce 1996: 73). This early
he both is and is not an Afrikaner himself, the apprehension of desire is followed by encounters
protagonist reveals not only the social schisms that vacillate between the spiritual and the
of the country in which he has been raised, but sensual, culminating in the sighting of the
also the psychic divisions, the fault-lines that bird-girl, who conjoins associations of spiritual
traverse public life and private life. yearning and sensual attraction. This moment
of conjunction between the aspirations of the
Over and above a general concern with the soul and the longing of the body marks the
role of language in the constitution of the
Downloaded by [Nova Southeastern University] at 05:06 31 December 2014
she seemed to answer without reserve, softly, read- be here. (1997: 96)
ily ... Isthis love- this easygenerosity, this sense of
being understood at last, of not having to pretend? The farm that exists from eternity to eternity
(1997: 94-95)
is distinct from the way of life the farm has
previously sustained and which has now all but
While the description lacks the lyricism and vanished, though traces remain in the ruined
languid mystery of the Joyce passage, the girl is kraals, the reduced orchards, the shearers who
similarly associated with the natural environ- arrive seemingly from "a heartland even more
ment, is likewise invested with sensuous quali- secluded from the world" (1997: 93). It is the
ties, and has a comparable quiet receptivity. idea of the farm that the boy cherishes, what it
Most revealing, though, is that she facilitates a represents in terms of human relationships and
certain kind of communication in which differ- relationships with the land. In truth he knows
ences between the languages of English and that he is simply an "uneasy guest" here, and
Afrikaans dissolve, thought is immediately that as he grows up the separation will increase,
accessible to "transparent words", the self is until "[o]ne day the farm will be wholly gone,
"understood" for the first time, and falsehood wholly lost", and "already he is grieving at that
falls away. This language of self-presence and loss" (1997: 79-80). Visiting the farm, he
truth is associated with absence of reserve and attempts to affirm a bond that is already
"easy generosity". In other words, it is under- unravelling, that has never been secure to begin
stood in terms of reciprocation and interrela- with, that exists largely in the imagination as an
tionship, a rare occurrence in an autobiography ideal rural order, one that has been compro-
characterized generally by lack of mutuality in mised from the outset, as the boy is vaguely
relationships. Given the context of what is aware, by the colonial conditions under which it
otherwise an austere account of an alienated arose.l? To belong is already to know what it
childhood, there is, in this revelation of authen- means not to belong. The unbelonging is
tic being, an epiphany of sorts, however muted. intimated in the belonging. What endures is
the space that enables the longing in belonging
It is significant that this affinity with another to emerge. 14
should occur on the Karoo farm Voelfontein,
which the protagonist describes as a place of the If the all-encompassing love inspired by the
heart that elicits a "devouring love" (1997: 91) farm is indistinguishable from nostalgia for
extending to "every stone of it, every bush, what is already past, and did not exist in this
every blade of grass" (1997: 80). What he idyllic way in the first place, what then of
human relationships? What, specifically, about The language of reciprocity, the language of
desire? Significantly, the conversation with desire, language as desire, what is this but poetic
Agnes is described in the past tense, marking a language? Since at least the late-eighteenth
break from the present tense of the surrounding century, beginning with Friedrich Schiller's On
narrative, as if to underscore that this is no more the aesthetic education of man (1795), the form
than a recollection, a nostalgia for what is in of language that has promised to reconcile
fact lost. The reciprocity the young protagonist subject and object, self and other, thought and
recalls is a singular event, a rare moment of self- feeling, word and referent, the conceptual and
possession, perhaps inseparable, when consid- the sensible, has been the language of the
ered closely, from a kind of narcissism, which aesthetic. More recently, the aesthetic ideal has
discovers in relation to the other an idealized been shown, in Terry Eagleton's words (1990:
image of the self, the true self as the self 362), to be "a scandalous impossibility", as
imagines itself to be from the perspective of the there can be no such overarching reconciliation.
Downloaded by [Nova Southeastern University] at 05:06 31 December 2014
other - the likeable self, the desired self. Does The yearning nevertheless persists. Paul de Man
this constitute reciprocity? How is true recipro- shifts the emphasis away from the attainment of
city to be recognized? Coetzee himself addresses wholeness towards the yearning itself, explain-
the question of reciprocity in his essay on ing the relationship between consciousness,
Achterberg (1992b: 72), where he endorses desire and the aesthetic in terms of the move-
Martin Buber's view that the primal relation ment of consciousness towards a condition of
between I and You has been lost in the completion it never attains, a movement that
objectification of the You into It and the constitutes, he says, the very impulse of the
consequent isolation and reduction of the l. aesthetic aspiration towards an impossible
He observes that "Intimations of the lost unity:
relation ... inspire our efforts to reconstitute
again and again the 'between' of the primal [- To the extent that desire is a movement of conscious-
ness toward something that it has lost, toward some-
Thou."
thing that it wants to possess in order to be complete,
its pattern is truly aesthetic. The desire of an aesthetic
Inasmuch as the human condition presup- consciousness is orientated toward its authenticity,
poses a lost relation that prompts repeated [which] it lost in the fallen world of empirical experi-
attempts at its reconstitution, it is not surprising ence. It experiences this desire as a lack, as a short-
that Boyhood and Youth portray an absence of coming in itself, which it tries to remedy. (1993: 45)
reciprocity, or at least its tenuousness, while
intimating that reciprocity is what is most The aesthetic consciousness seeks to over-
desired. Attwell (1992: 58) recognizes the im- come lack but is unable to do so. It cannot
portance to Coetzee of the notion of reciprocity attain the closure it desires and ends up
and maintains that forms of this relation can be inscribing its own impossibility. This very
detected not only in Coetzee's deliberations on correspondence between the structure of desire
"desire and its objects" but also in his interest in and the structure of aesthetic consciousness
"problems of consciousness". The crucial point provides the narrative drive of Youth, whose
is that reciprocity is implicated in consciousness protagonist reflects endlessly and obsessively on
by virtue of its intentional relation with its passion and poetry. He speaks of "some
objects. If, as Lacanian psychoanalysis suggests, indwelling shape in his soul", of the "Destined
this relation comprises a structure of desire One" from whose embrace he will return to life
constituted by language, then the failure of "as a new being, transformed" (2002: 92-93),
reciprocity is simultaneously a failure of both parodying Stephen Dedalus's fantasy of "weak-
consciousness and of language. ness and inexperience and timidity" falling from
him as he is "transfigured" by love (1996: 73). protagonist anticipates the writing of a literary
For both protagonists, the transformational work that will return him in his imagination to
power of love is linked with the transfiguring the home country.
power of the aesthetic, leading the protagonist
of Youth to muse that only "love and art are Solipsistic introspection, remorseless ratioci-
worthy of giving oneself to without reserve" nation and deflating irony, evident in Joyce's A
(2002: 85). The difference is that in Youth it is portrait of the artist, are deployed with savage
the failure of love and of poetry that preoccu- self-exposure and dark humour in Coetzee's
pies the protagonist: Boyhood and Youth. Nevertheless, despite the
self-deprecation, there is a serious process of
One question still nags at him, and will not go away. reflection in these autobiographical works, and
Will the womanwho unlocksthe store of passion with- especially in Youth, concerning the aesthetic
in him, if she exists, also release the blocked flow of imagination and the nature of its understanding,
Downloaded by [Nova Southeastern University] at 05:06 31 December 2014
poetry;or on the contraryisit up to himto turn himself its epistemology. When, encountering the work
intoa poet and thus prove worthyof her love? Itwould
of Joseph Brodsky, the protagonist claims that
be nice if the first were true, but he suspects it is
not ... the intended one willhaveto know him by his
"Poetry is truth" (2002: 91), and when, listening
works, to fall in love with his art before she will be so to Bach, he discovers in the music an intimation
foolish as to fallin lovewith him. (2002: 134) of "a joyous yielding of the reasoning, compre-
hending mind to the dance of the fingers"
Identification between the failure of desire (2002: 93), he is not simply to be taken
and the failure of the aesthetic is made explicit ironically. What he is getting at, what he means
when the protagonist mentions that "his failure by poetic truth and by the pleasure of the senses,
as a writer and his failure as a lover are so is hinted at in his reading of Burchell. His own
closely parallel that they might as well be the writing, he says, will seek to communicate
something as "convincing" as Burchell's Tra-
same thing" (2002: 166). By the end of the
vels, something that might not have happened
narrative, he has come to accept that he might
but is nevertheless located in sensory experience,
never encounter the beloved muse: "[Tjhe words
something that might not be true but never-
will not come to him. Or rather, many words
theless has an "aura of truth", something that
will come, but not the right words, the sentence
might not be historically factual but nevertheless
he will recognize at once, from its weight, from
constitutes a "humble" kind of knowledge
its poise and balance, as the destined one"
(2002: 138-139).
(2002: 166). Of course these words did come
eventually, not to the protagonist nor even to The truth of the imagination is different from
the narrator, neither of whom can be assumed either empirical truth or the truth of formal
to exist outside the text that inscribes them, but logic. When the youthful protagonist discovers
certainly to the author, or, rather, to an author, Brodsky, he is captivated by the line "As dark as
one who goes by the name of JM Coetzee, and the inside of the needle" (2002: 91). What truth
the words did not come in verse but in prose, is this that communicates obscurely and am-
and what prompted them was not high literature biguously, that chooses the opaque corporeality
but an immersion in the non-fictional work of of the image rather than the clear abstractions
early travel writers in South Africa, in particular of reason, that seems to distract the mind rather
Burchell, whom both the protagonist and JM than direct it? Youth illustrates the ineffectuality
Coetzee read in the British Museum in London of reason in resolving the problem of living and
in the early 1960s. Having fled South Africa in the complexity of reciprocity. Like Stephen
order to pursue a career as literary artist, the Dedalus, the protagonist's endless analysis of
motives and responses in his relationships leads 2 See also Coetzee's essay "The novel today" in
him no closer to establishing intimacy with Upstream (1988d).
another. This compels him to interrogate the 3 The interrelationship of fiction, critical metafiction
very logic of reason as he pores over Aristotle, and the writing of the life has been evident in
Ramus and Carnap, trying to locate "the Coetzee's work from the outset, beginning with
moment in history when either-or is chosen Dusklands.
and and/or discarded" (2002: 160). It is not clear 4 For example, the young protagonist of Boyhood
what precisely the logic of and/or entails, or even finds himself positioned as a religious outsider at
if it is to be taken seriously, but it does point in school on account of an arbitrary choice of Cath-
olicism as his religion of choice.
the direction of a kind of thinking that is both
inclusive and singular, that pays attention to 5 The young protagonist of Boyhood recalls three
context and to detail, that invokes the generality "first" memories.
of reason and the particularity of feeling. The 6 There are exceptions to the first-person narration
Downloaded by [Nova Southeastern University] at 05:06 31 December 2014
logic of and/or might be taken, that is, to suggest in autobiography, the most celebrated being
the logic of the aesthetic. Henry Adams' The education of Henry Adams.
Works cited
Kevin Newmark and Andrzej Warminski (eds). Ro-
Attridge, Derek. 2005. JM Coetzee and the ethics of manticism and contemporarycriticism: the Gauss
reading. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal seminarand otherpapers: Baltimore and London:
Press. The Johns Hopkins University Press: 3-122.
Attwell, David. 1991. On the question of autobiography: Eagleton, Terry. 1990. The ideology of the aesthetic.
interview with JM Coetzee. Current Writing 3 Oxford: Blackwell.
(1): 117-122.
Folkenflik, Robert. 1993. The self as other. In:Robert
Attwell, David. 1992. The Poetics of Reciprocity. In: Da- Folkenflik (ed). The cultureof autobiography: con-
vid Attwell (ed). Doublingthepoint: essays and in-
structions of self-representation. Stanford: Stan-
terviews. Cambridge and London: Harvard
ford University Press: 215-234.
University Press: 57--68.
Joyce, James. 1996. A portrait of the artist as a young
Buruma, Ian. 2002. Portrait of the artist. New York Re-
man. London: Penguin.
viewof Books49 (19),12 May: 52-53.
Lee, Hermione. 2002. Uneasy guest. London Review
Coetzee, JM.1998. Dusklands. Vintage.
of Books 24 (13),11 July:14-15.
- - . 1988a. Reading the South African landscape.
Lenta, Margaret. 2003. Autrebiography: J.M. Coetzee's
White writing: on thecultureof lettersin SouthAfri-
Boyhood and Youth. English in Africa30 (1), May:
ca. New Haven and London: Radix and Yale Uni-
157-169.
versity Press: 163-178.
Renza, Louis.1980. A theory of autobiography. In:
- - . 1988b. Farm novel and plaasroman. White writ-
JamesOlney (ed). Autobiography: essays theore-
ing: on the culture of lettersin South Africa. New
tical and critical. Princeton: Princeton University
Haven and London: Radix and Yale University
Press: 268-295.
Press: 63-81.
Schiller, Friedrich. 1967 [1795]. On theaestheticeduca-
- - . 1988c. The picturesque, the sublime, and the
tion of man. Edited by Elizabeth M Wilkinson and
SouthAfrican landscape. White writing: on thecul-
LA Willoughby. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ture of letters in South Africa. New Haven and
London: Radix and Yale University Press: 36--62. Sprinkler, Michael. 1980. Fictions of the self: the end of
autobiography. In: James Olney (ed). Autobiogra-
- - . 1988d. The novel today. Upstream 6 (1): 2-5.
phy: essays theoretical and critical. Princeton:
- - . 1992a.lnterview with David Attwell.ln: David At- Princeton University Press: 321-342.
well (ed). Doubling the point: essays and inter-
Sturrock, John. 1993. Theory versus autobiography. In:
views. Cambridge and London: Harvard
Robert Folkenflik (ed). The culture of autobiogra-
University Press: 391-396.
phy: constructions of self-representation. Stan-
- - . 1992b. Achterberg's "Ballade van de gasfitter": ford: Stanford University Press: 21-3Z