Document 2.0
Document 2.0
Introduction
Explores the real experiences of LGBTQ+ students dealing with ALS while
going through school. We want to understand the unique challenges and successes they
face. As schools aim to include everyone, we’re shining a light on the personal and health
struggles of these students. By sharing their stories, we hope to contribute to the
conversation about making schools more welcoming for everyone. Our goal is to offer
practical insights for teachers and support teams to create a better and more inclusive
school environment for a diverse range of students.The Alternative Learning System
(ALS) in the Philippines serves as a vital avenue for individuals who have not had the
opportunity to complete formal education. Among the diverse groups accessing ALS are
LGBTQ+ individuals, who face distinct challenges related to their sexual orientation,
gender identity, and societal attitudes. Despite the growing recognition of LGBTQ+
rights globally, disparities in educational access and experiences persist, particularly in
contexts like the Philippines where cultural and social norms may hinder LGBTQ+
individuals’ educational attainment. This study seeks to address this gap by exploring the
academic journey of LGBTQ+ ALS students, shedding light on their experiences,
struggles, and triumphs within the educational landscape. (Tanalan 2024)
Research Design
We’re talking to LGBTQ+ students in the Philippines who are part of the ALS
program. Through interviews and observations, we want to understand their
experiences – the challenges and successes. The goal is to use their stories to suggest
ways to make ALS more supportive and inclusive for LGBTQ+ students.
Limitations:
Same Experiences: If everyone in the LGBTQ+ ALS student group is similar, the study
might miss out on different stories from the larger LGBTQ+ community.
Hard to Find Participants: It could be tough to find a diverse group of LGBTQ+ ALS
students, making it tricky to show a wide range of experiences.
People Pretending: The group setting might make students act in a way they think is
expected, rather than sharing their true experiences.
Things Changing: External things like new ALS rules or societal changes might happen,
affecting how relevant the study's findings are.
Delimitations:
One ALS Program: The study is looking at one specific ALS program, so what we learn
might not apply to other ALS programs that work differently.
Specific Place: It's focusing on a certain location, understanding that LGBTQ+ experiences
might be different in other places.
Certain Age Group: The study might only look at a certain age group in the LGBTQ+ ALS
student community, recognizing that experiences can vary between younger and older
students.
In this study, we’re exploring the school experiences of LGBTQ+ students in the ALS
program in the Philippines. The organization of our research involves three main parts:
Introduction: This sets the stage, explaining why we’re looking into the academic journey
of LGBTQ+ ALS students and why it matters.
Methods: Here, we detail how we’re doing the study. We’re talking to students, using
interviews and observations to understand their experiences. This part explains our
approach to gathering information.
Findings and Recommendations: The final section shares what we’ve learned. We’ll
discuss the stories we heard, highlight common themes, and suggest ways to make ALS
more supportive for LGBTQ+ students.
Through this organization, we aim to offer a clear and insightful look into the
experiences of LGBTQ+ students in the ALS program, providing recommendations for
positive changes in the educational journey of this community.
Theoretical lens
If we follow the recent history and theory of sexuality, we are asked to assume
that sexuality is a social fact. What is imagined as sexuality, its personal and social
meaning and form, varies historically and between social groups. Indeed, if we are to
take seriously Foucault’s The History of Sexuality (1980), the very idea of sexuality as a
unity composed of discrete desires, acts, developmental patterns, and sexual and
psychological types is itself a recent and uniquely “modern” Western event. For
example, the ancient Greeks imagined a sphere of pleasures (aphrodisia) which included
eating, athletics, man/boy love, and marriage, not a realm of sexuality (Foucault 1985).
This new theorizing figures sex as thoroughly social: bodies, sensations, pleasures, acts,
and interactions are made into “sex” or accrue sexual meanings by means of discourses
and institutional practices. Framing “sex” as social unavoidably makes it a political fact.
Which sensations or acts are defined as sexual, what moral boundaries demarcate
legitimate and illegitimate sex, and who stipulates this are political. Paralleling class or
gender politics, sexual politics involve struggles around the formation of, and resistance
to, a sexual social hierarchy (Rubin 1983).