0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

Method 19

This document provides procedures for determining sulfur dioxide removal efficiency, particulate matter emission rates, sulfur dioxide emission rates, and nitrogen oxide emission rates from pollutant concentration data and fuel analysis. It defines relevant terms and equations but does not include sample collection or analysis procedures.

Uploaded by

JeeEianYann
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

Method 19

This document provides procedures for determining sulfur dioxide removal efficiency, particulate matter emission rates, sulfur dioxide emission rates, and nitrogen oxide emission rates from pollutant concentration data and fuel analysis. It defines relevant terms and equations but does not include sample collection or analysis procedures.

Uploaded by

JeeEianYann
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Method 19 3/29/2023

While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version of the document, it is not the
official version. To see a complete version including any recent edits, visit:
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ECFR?page=browse and search under Title 40, Protection of
Environment.

METHOD 19 - DETERMINATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND


PARTICULATE MATTER, SULFUR DIOXIDE, AND NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSION RATES

1.0 Scope and Application

1.1 Analytes. This method provides data reduction procedures relating to the following pollutants, but
does not include any sample collection or analysis procedures.

Analyte CAS No. Sensitivity


Nitrogen oxides (NOX), including:
Nitric oxide (NO) 10102–43–9 N/A
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 10102–44–0
Particulate matter (PM) None assigned N/A
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) 7499–09–05 N/A

1.2 Applicability. Where specified by an applicable subpart of the regulations, this method is applicable
for the determination of (a) PM, SO2, and NOX emission rates; (b) sulfur removal efficiencies of fuel
pretreatment and SO2 control devices; and (c) overall reduction of potential SO2 emissions.

2.0 Summary of Method

2.1 Emission Rates. Oxygen (O2) or carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations and appropriate F factors
(ratios of combustion gas volumes to heat inputs) are used to calculate pollutant emission rates from
pollutant concentrations.

2.2 Sulfur Reduction Efficiency and SO2 Removal Efficiency. An overall SO2 emission reduction
efficiency is computed from the efficiency of fuel pretreatment systems, where applicable, and the
efficiency of control devices.

2.2.1 The sulfur removal efficiency of a fuel pretreatment system is determined by fuel sampling and
analysis of the sulfur and heat contents of the fuel before and after the pretreatment system.

2.2.2 The SO2 removal efficiency of a control device is determined by measuring the SO2 rates before
and after the control device.

2.2.2.1 The inlet rates to SO2 control systems (or, when SO2 control systems are not used, SO2 emission
rates to the atmosphere) are determined by fuel sampling and analysis.

3.0 Definitions[Reserved]

4.0 Interferences[Reserved]

1
Method 19 3/29/2023

5.0 Safety[Reserved]

6.0 Equipment and Supplies[Reserved]

7.0 Reagents and Standards[Reserved]

8.0 Sample Collection, Preservation, Storage, and Transport[Reserved]

9.0 Quality Control[Reserved]

10.0 Calibration and Standardization[Reserved]

11.0 Analytical Procedures[Reserved]

12.0 Data Analysis and Calculations

12.1 Nomenclature

Bwa = Moisture fraction of ambient air, percent.

Bws = Moisture fraction of effluent gas, percent.

%C = Concentration of carbon from an ultimate analysis of fuel, weight percent.

Cd = Pollutant concentration, dry basis, ng/scm (lb/scf)

%CO2d,%CO2w = Concentration of carbon dioxide on a dry and wet basis, respectively, percent.

Cw = Pollutant concentration, wet basis, ng/scm (lb/scf).

D = Number of sampling periods during the performance test period.

E = Pollutant emission rate, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Ea = Average pollutant rate for the specified performance test period, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Eao, Eai = Average pollutant rate of the control device, outlet and inlet, respectively, for the performance
test period, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Ebi = Pollutant rate from the steam generating unit, ng/J (lb/million Btu)

Ebo = Pollutant emission rate from the steam generating unit, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Eci = Pollutant rate in combined effluent, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Eco = Pollutant emission rate in combined effluent, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

2
Method 19 3/29/2023

Ed = Average pollutant rate for each sampling period (e.g., 24-hr Method 6B sample or 24-hr fuel sample)
or for each fuel lot (e.g., amount of fuel bunkered), ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Edi=Average inlet SO2 rate for each sampling period d, ng/J (lb/million Btu)

Eg = Pollutant rate from gas turbine, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Ega = Daily geometric average pollutant rate, ng/J (lbs/million Btu) or ppm corrected to 7 percent O2.

Ejo,Eji = Matched pair hourly arithmetic average pollutant rate, outlet and inlet, respectively, ng/J
(lb/million Btu) or ppm corrected to 7 percent O2.

Eh = Hourly average pollutant, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Ehj = Hourly arithmetic average pollutant rate for hour “j,” ng/J (lb/million Btu) or ppm corrected to 7
percent O2.

EXP = Natural logarithmic base (2.718) raised to the value enclosed by brackets.

Fd, Fw, Fc = Volumes of combustion components per unit of heat content, scm/J (scf/million Btu).

GCV = Gross calorific value of the fuel consistent with the ultimate analysis, kJ/kg (Btu/lb).

GCVp, GCVr = Gross calorific value for the product and raw fuel lots, respectively, dry basis, kJ/kg
(Btu/lb).

%H = Concentration of hydrogen from an ultimate analysis of fuel, weight percent.

H = Total number of operating hours for which pollutant rates are determined in the performance test
period.

Hb = Heat input rate to the steam generating unit from fuels fired in the steam generating unit, J/hr
(million Btu/hr).

Hg = Heat input rate to gas turbine from all fuels fired in the gas turbine, J/hr (million Btu/hr).

%H2O = Concentration of water from an ultimate analysis of fuel, weight percent.

Hr = Total numbers of hours in the performance test period (e.g., 720 hours for 30-day performance test
period).

K = Conversion factor, 10−5(kJ/J)/(%) [106 Btu/million Btu].

Kc = (9.57 scm/kg)/% [(1.53 scf/lb)/%].

Kcc = (2.0 scm/kg)/% [(0.321 scf/lb)/%].

Khd = (22.7 scm/kg)/% [(3.64 scf/lb)/%].

3
Method 19 3/29/2023

Khw = (34.74 scm/kg)/% [(5.57 scf/lb)/%].

Kn = (0.86 scm/kg)/% [(0.14 scf/lb)/%].

Ko = (2.85 scm/kg)/% [(0.46 scf/lb)/%].

Ks = (3.54 scm/kg)/% [(0.57 scf/lb)/%].

Kw = (1.30 scm/kg)/% [(0.21 scf/lb)/%].

ln =Natural log of indicated value.

Lp,L r= Weight of the product and raw fuel lots, respectively, metric ton (ton).

%N = Concentration of nitrogen from an ultimate analysis of fuel, weight percent.

N = Number of fuel lots during the averaging period.

n = Number of fuels being burned in combination.

nd = Number of operating hours of the affected facility within the performance test period for each Ed
determined.

nt = Total number of hourly averages for which paired inlet and outlet pollutant rates are available within
the 24-hr midnight to midnight daily period.

%O = Concentration of oxygen from an ultimate analysis of fuel, weight percent.

%O2d, %O2w = Concentration of oxygen on a dry and wet basis, respectively, percent.

Ps = Potential SO2 emissions, percent.

%Rf = SO2 removal efficiency from fuel pretreatment, percent.

%Rg = SO2 removal efficiency of the control device, percent.

%Rga = Daily geometric average percent reduction.

%Ro = Overall SO2 reduction, percent.

%S = Sulfur content of as-fired fuel lot, dry basis, weight percent.

Se = Standard deviation of the hourly average pollutant rates for each performance test period, ng/J
(lb/million Btu).

%Sf = Concentration of sulfur from an ultimate analysis of fuel, weight percent.

4
Method 19 3/29/2023

Si = Standard deviation of the hourly average inlet pollutant rates for each performance test period, ng/J
(lb/million Btu).

So = Standard deviation of the hourly average emission rates for each performance test period, ng/J
(lb/million Btu).

%Sp, %Sr = Sulfur content of the product and raw fuel lots respectively, dry basis, weight percent.

T0.95 = Values shown in Table 19–3 for the indicated number of data points n.

Xk = Fraction of total heat input from each type of fuel k.

12.2 Emission Rates of PM, SO2, and NOX. Select from the following sections the applicable procedure
to compute the PM, SO2, or NOX emission rate (E) in ng/J (lb/million Btu). The pollutant concentration
must be in ng/scm (lb/scf) and the F factor must be in scm/J (scf/million Btu). If the pollutant
concentration (C) is not in the appropriate units, use Table 19–1 in Section 17.0 to make the proper
conversion. An F factor is the ratio of the gas volume of the products of combustion to the heat content of
the fuel. The dry F factor (Fd) includes all components of combustion less water, the wet F factor (Fw)
includes all components of combustion, and the carbon F factor (Fc) includes only carbon dioxide.

Note: Since Fw factors include water resulting only from the combustion of hydrogen in the fuel, the
procedures using Fw factors are not applicable for computing E from steam generating units with wet
scrubbers or with other processes that add water (e.g., steam injection).

12.2.1 Oxygen-Based F Factor, Dry Basis. When measurements are on a dry basis for both O (%O2d) and
pollutant (Cd) concentrations, use the following equation:

12.2.2 Oxygen-Based F Factor, Wet Basis. When measurements are on a wet basis for both O2 (%O2w)
and pollutant (Cw) concentrations, use either of the following:

12.2.2.1 If the moisture fraction of ambient air (Bwa) is measured:

Instead of actual measurement, Bwa may be estimated according to the procedure below.

Note: The estimates are selected to ensure that negative errors will not be larger than −1.5 percent.
However, positive errors, or over-estimation of emissions by as much as 5 percent may be introduced
depending upon the geographic location of the facility and the associated range of ambient moisture.

12.2.2.1.1 Bwa = 0.027. This value may be used at any location at all times.

5
Method 19 3/29/2023

12.2.2.1.2 Bwa = Highest monthly average of Bwa that occurred within the previous calendar year at the
nearest Weather Service Station. This value shall be determined annually and may be used as an estimate
for the entire current calendar year.

12.2.2.1.3 Bwa = Highest daily average of Bwa that occurred within a calendar month at the nearest
Weather Service Station, calculated from the data from the past 3 years. This value shall be computed for
each month and may be used as an estimate for the current respective calendar month.

12.2.2.2 If the moisture fraction (Bws) of the effluent gas is measured:

12.2.3 Oxygen-Based F Factor, Dry/Wet Basis.

12.2.3.1 When the pollutant concentration is measured on a wet basis (Cw) and O2 concentration is
measured on a dry basis (%O2d), use the following equation:

12.2.3.2 When the pollutant concentration is measured on a dry basis (Cd) and the O2 concentration is
measured on a wet basis (%O2w), use the following equation:

12.2.4 Carbon Dioxide-Based F Factor, Dry Basis. When measurements are on a dry basis for both CO2
(%CO2d) and pollutant (Cd) concentrations, use the following equation:

12.2.5 Carbon Dioxide-Based F Factor, Wet Basis. When measurements are on a wet basis for both CO2
(%CO2w) and pollutant (Cw) concentrations, use the following equation:

12.2.6 Carbon Dioxide-Based F Factor, Dry/Wet Basis.

12.2.6.1 When the pollutant concentration is measured on a wet basis (Cw) and CO2 concentration is
measured on a dry basis (%CO2d), use the following equation:

6
Method 19 3/29/2023

12.2.6.2 When the pollutant concentration is measured on a dry basis (Cd) and CO2 concentration is
measured on a wet basis (%CO2w), use the following equation:

12.2.7 Direct-Fired Reheat Fuel Burning. The effect of direct-fired reheat fuel burning (for the purpose of
raising the temperature of the exhaust effluent from wet scrubbers to above the moisture dew-point) on
emission rates will be less than 1.0 percent and, therefore, may be ignored.

12.2.8 Combined Cycle-Gas Turbine Systems. For gas turbine-steam generator combined cycle systems,
determine the emissions from the steam generating unit or the percent reduction in potential SO2
emissions as follows:

12.2.8.1 Compute the emission rate from the steam generating unit using the following equation:

12.2.8.1.1 Use the test methods and procedures section of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart GG to obtain Eco and
Eg. Do not use Fw factors for determining Eg or Eco. If an SO2 control device is used, measure Eco after the
control device.

12.2.8.1.2 Suitable methods shall be used to determine the heat input rates to the steam generating units
(Hb) and the gas turbine (Hg).

12.2.8.2 If a control device is used, compute the percent of potential SO2 emissions (Ps) using the
following equations:

Note: Use the test methods and procedures section of Subpart GG to obtain Eci and Eg. Do not use Fw
factors for determining Eg or Eci.

7
Method 19 3/29/2023

12.3 F Factors. Use an average F factor according to Section 12.3.1 or determine an applicable F factor
according to Section 12.3.2. If combined fuels are fired, prorate the applicable F factors using the
procedure in Section 12.3.3.

12.3.1 Average F Factors. Average F factors (Fd, Fw, or Fc) from Table 19–2 in Section 17.0 may be used.

12.3.2 Determined F Factors. If the fuel burned is not listed in Table 19–2 or if the owner or operator
chooses to determine an F factor rather than use the values in Table 19–2, use the procedure below:

12.3.2.1 Equations. Use the equations below, as appropriate, to compute the F factors:

Note: Omit the %H2O term in the equations for Fw if %H and %O include the unavailable hydrogen and
oxygen in the form of H2O.)

12.3.2.2 Use applicable sampling procedures in Section 12.5.2.1 or 12.5.2.2 to obtain samples for
analyses.

12.3.2.3 Use ASTM D 3176–74 or 89 (all cited ASTM standards are incorporated by reference—see
§60.17) for ultimate analysis of the fuel.

12.3.2.4 Use applicable methods in Section 12.5.2.1 or 12.5.2.2 to determine the heat content of solid or
liquid fuels. For gaseous fuels, use ASTM D 1826–77 or 94 (incorporated by reference—see §60.17) to
determine the heat content.

12.3.3 F Factors for Combination of Fuels. If combinations of fuels are burned, use the following
equations, as applicable unless otherwise specified in an applicable subpart:

8
Method 19 3/29/2023

12.4 Determination of Average Pollutant Rates.

12.4.1 Average Pollutant Rates from Hourly Values. When hourly average pollutant rates (Eh), inlet or
outlet, are obtained (e.g., CEMS values), compute the average pollutant rate (Ea) for the performance test
period (e.g., 30 days) specified in the applicable regulation using the following equation:

12.4.2 Average Pollutant Rates from Other than Hourly Averages. When pollutant rates are determined
from measured values representing longer than 1-hour periods (e.g., daily fuel sampling and analyses or
Method 6B values), or when pollutant rates are determined from combinations of 1-hour and longer than
1-hour periods (e.g., CEMS and Method 6B values), compute the average pollutant rate (Ea) for the
performance test period (e.g., 30 days) specified in the applicable regulation using the following equation:

12.4.3 Daily Geometric Average Pollutant Rates from Hourly Values. The geometric average pollutant
rate (Ega) is computed using the following equation:

12.5 Determination of Overall Reduction in Potential Sulfur Dioxide Emission.

12.5.1 Overall Percent Reduction. Compute the overall percent SO2 reduction (%Ro) using the following
equation:

12.5.2 Pretreatment Removal Efficiency (Optional). Compute the SO2 removal efficiency from fuel
pretreatment (%Rf) for the averaging period (e.g., 90 days) as specified in the applicable regulation using
the following equation:

9
Method 19 3/29/2023

Note: In calculating %Rf, include %S and GCV values for all fuel lots that are not pretreated and are used
during the averaging period.

12.5.2.1 Solid Fossil (Including Waste) Fuel/Sampling and Analysis.

Note: For the purposes of this method, raw fuel (coal or oil) is the fuel delivered to the desulfurization
(pretreatment) facility. For oil, the input oil to the oil desulfurization process (e.g., hydrotreatment) is
considered to be the raw fuel.

12.5.2.1.1 Sample Increment Collection. Use ASTM D 2234–76, 96, 97a, or 98 (incorporated by
reference—see §60.17), Type I, Conditions A, B, or C, and systematic spacing. As used in this method,
systematic spacing is intended to include evenly spaced increments in time or increments based on equal
weights of coal passing the collection area. As a minimum, determine the number and weight of
increments required per gross sample representing each coal lot according to Table 2 or Paragraph 7.1.5.2
of ASTM D 2234. Collect one gross sample for each lot of raw coal and one gross sample for each lot of
product coal.

12.5.2.1.2 ASTM Lot Size. For the purpose of Section 12.5.2 (fuel pretreatment), the lot size of product
coal is the weight of product coal from one type of raw coal. The lot size of raw coal is the weight of raw
coal used to produce one lot of product coal. Typically, the lot size is the weight of coal processed in a 1-
day (24-hour) period. If more than one type of coal is treated and produced in 1 day, then gross samples
must be collected and analyzed for each type of coal. A coal lot size equaling the 90-day quarterly fuel
quantity for a steam generating unit may be used if representative sampling can be conducted for each
raw coal and product coal.

Note: Alternative definitions of lot sizes may be used, subject to prior approval of the Administrator.

12.5.2.1.3 Gross Sample Analysis. Use ASTM D 2013–72 or 86 to prepare the sample, ASTM D 3177–
75 or 89 or ASTM D 4239–85, 94, or 97 to determine sulfur content (%S), ASTM D 3173–73 or 87 to
determine moisture content, and ASTM D 2015–77 (Reapproved 1978) or 96, D 3286–85 or 96, or D
5865–98 to determine gross calorific value (GCV) (all standards cited are incorporated by reference—see
§60.17 for acceptable versions of the standards) on a dry basis for each gross sample.

12.5.2.2 Liquid Fossil Fuel-Sampling and Analysis. See Note under Section 12.5.2.1.

12.5.2.2.1 Sample Collection. Follow the procedures for continuous sampling in ASTM D 270 or D
4177–95 (incorporated by reference—see §60.17) for each gross sample from each fuel lot.

12.5.2.2.2 Lot Size. For the purpose of Section 12.5.2 (fuel pretreatment), the lot size of a product oil is
the weight of product oil from one pretreatment facility and intended as one shipment (ship load, barge
load, etc.). The lot size of raw oil is the weight of each crude liquid fuel type used to produce a lot of
product oil.

10
Method 19 3/29/2023

Note: Alternative definitions of lot sizes may be used, subject to prior approval of the Administrator.

12.5.2.2.3 Sample Analysis. Use ASTM D 129–64, 78, or 95, ASTM D 1552–83 or 95, or ASTM D
4057–81 or 95 to determine the sulfur content (%S) and ASTM D 240–76 or 92 (all standards cited are
incorporated by reference—see §60.17) to determine the GCV of each gross sample. These values may be
assumed to be on a dry basis. The owner or operator of an affected facility may elect to determine the
GCV by sampling the oil combusted on the first steam generating unit operating day of each calendar
month and then using the lowest GCV value of the three GCV values per quarter for the GCV of all oil
combusted in that calendar quarter.

12.5.2.3 Use appropriate procedures, subject to the approval of the Administrator, to determine the
fraction of total mass input derived from each type of fuel.

12.5.3 Control Device Removal Efficiency. Compute the percent removal efficiency (%Rg) of the control
device using the following equation:

12.5.3.1 Use continuous emission monitoring systems or test methods, as appropriate, to determine the
outlet SO2 rates and, if appropriate, the inlet SO2 rates. The rates may be determined as hourly (Eh) or
other sampling period averages (Ed). Then, compute the average pollutant rates for the performance test
period (Eao and Eai) using the procedures in Section 12.4.

12.5.3.2 As an alternative, as-fired fuel sampling and analysis may be used to determine inlet SO2 rates as
follows:

12.5.3.2.1 Compute the average inlet SO2 rate (Edi) for each sampling period using the following
equation:

Where:

After calculating Edi, use the procedures in Section 12.4 to determine the average inlet SO2 ate for the
performance test period (Eai).

12.5.3.2.2 Collect the fuel samples from a location in the fuel handling system that provides a sample
representative of the fuel bunkered or consumed during a steam generating unit operating day. For the
purpose of as-fired fuel sampling under Section 12.5.3.2 or Section 12.6, the lot size for coal is the weight
of coal bunkered or consumed during each steam generating unit operating day. The lot size for oil is the
weight of oil supplied to the “day” tank or consumed during each steam generating unit operating day.
For reporting and calculation purposes, the gross sample shall be identified with the calendar day on

11
Method 19 3/29/2023

which sampling began. For steam generating unit operating days when a coal-fired steam generating unit
is operated without coal being added to the bunkers, the coal analysis from the previous “as bunkered”
coal sample shall be used until coal is bunkered again. For steam generating unit operating days when an
oil-fired steam generating unit is operated without oil being added to the oil “day” tank, the oil analysis
from the previous day shall be used until the “day” tank is filled again. Alternative definitions of fuel lot
size may be used, subject to prior approval of the Administrator.

12.5.3.2.3 Use ASTM procedures specified in Section 12.5.2.1 or 12.5.2.2 to determine %S and GCV.

12.5.4 Daily Geometric Average Percent Reduction from Hourly Values. The geometric average percent
reduction (%Rga) is computed using the following equation:

Note: The calculation includes only paired data sets (hourly average) for the inlet and outlet pollutant
measurements.

12.6 Sulfur Retention Credit for Compliance Fuel. If fuel sampling and analysis procedures in Section
12.5.2.1 are being used to determine average SO2 emission rates (Eas) to the atmosphere from a coal-fired
steam generating unit when there is no SO2 control device, the following equation may be used to adjust
the emission rate for sulfur retention credits (no credits are allowed for oil-fired systems) (Edi) for each
sampling period using the following equation:

Where:

After calculating Edi, use the procedures in Section 12.4.2 to determine the average SO2 emission rate to
the atmosphere for the performance test period (Eao).

12.7 Determination of Compliance When Minimum Data Requirement Is Not Met.

12.7.1 Adjusted Emission Rates and Control Device Removal Efficiency. When the minimum data
requirement is not met, the Administrator may use the following adjusted emission rates or control device
removal efficiencies to determine compliance with the applicable standards.

12.7.1.1 Emission Rate. Compliance with the emission rate standard may be determined by using the
lower confidence limit of the emission rate (Eao*) as follows:

12
Method 19 3/29/2023

12.7.1.2 Control Device Removal Efficiency. Compliance with the overall emission reduction (%Ro)
may be determined by using the lower confidence limit of the emission rate (Eao*) and the upper
confidence limit of the inlet pollutant rate (Eai*) in calculating the control device removal efficiency
(%Rg) as follows:

12.7.2 Standard Deviation of Hourly Average Pollutant Rates. Compute the standard deviation (Se) of the
hourly average pollutant rates using the following equation:

Equation 19–19 through 19–31 may be used to compute the standard deviation for both the outlet (So)
and, if applicable, inlet (Si) pollutant rates.

13.0 Method Performance[Reserved]

14.0 Pollution Prevention[Reserved]

15.0 Waste Management[Reserved]

16.0 References[Reserved]

17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data

Table 19–1—Conversion Factors for Concentration

From To Multiply by
g/scm ng/scm 109
mg/scm ng/scm 106
lb/scf ng/scm 1.602 × 1013
ppm SO2 ng/scm 2.66 × 106
ppm NOX ng/scm 1.912 × 106
ppm SO2 lb/scf 1.660 × 10−7
ppm NOX lb/scf 1.194 × 10−7

13
Method 19 3/29/2023

Table 19–2—F Factors for Various Fuels1

Fd Fw Fc
Fuel Type dscm/J dscf/106Btu wscm/J wscf/106Btu scm/J scf/106Btu
Coal:
Anthracite2 2.71×10−7 10,100 2.83×10−7 10,540 0.530×10−7 1,970
Bituminus2 2.63×10−7 9,780 2.86×10−7 10,640 0.484×10−7 1,800
Lignite 2.65×10−7 9,860 3.21×10−7 11,950 0.513×10−7 1,910
Oil3 2.47×10−7 9,190 2.77×10−7 10,320 0.383×10−7 1,420
Gas:
Natural 2.34×10−7 8,710 2.85×10−7 10,610 0.287×10−7 1,040
Propane 2.34×10−7 8,710 2.74×10−7 10,200 0.321×10−7 1,190
Butane 2.34×10−7 8,710 2.79×10−7 10,390 0.337×10−7 1,250
Wood 2.48×10−7 9,240 0.492×10−7 1,830
Wood Bark 2.58×10−7 9,600 0.516×10−7 1,920
Municipal 2.57×10−7 9,570 0.488×10−7 1,820
Solid Waste

1
Determined at standard conditions: 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 in Hg)

2
As classified according to ASTM D 388.

3
Crude, residual, or distillate.

14
Method 19 3/29/2023

Table 19–3—Values for T0.95*

n1 t0.95 n1 t0.95 n1 t0.95


2 6.31 8 1.89 22–26 1.71
3 2.42 9 1.86 27–31 1.70
4 2.35 10 1.83 32–51 1.68
5 2.13 11 1.81 52–91 1.67
6 2.02 12–16 1.77 92–151 1.66
7 1.94 17–21 1.73 152 or more 1.65

1
The values of this table are corrected for n-1 degrees of freedom. Use n equal to the number (H) of
hourly average data points.

15

You might also like