Session 18
Session 18
- Executive
Execution and implementation of policy
Political executives, especially chief executives - face of politics with which the general
public is most familiar
The executive is the source of political leadership
Its role as the source of leadership – enhanced by media’s tendency to portray politics in
terms of personalities
- Division of government into:
Legislative – makes law/enacts legislation
Executive – implements law/executes legislation
Judicial – interprets law/adjudication on the basis of law
for the separation of powers
- Distinction between political and bureaucratic executive – most clear in parliamentary systems:
Political executive
o Elected politicians and ministers from the assembly
o Accountable to the assembly
o Make policies aligning with the political and ideological priorities of their party
o Oversee policy implementation
Bureaucratic executive
o Civil servants
o Offer advice and administer policy
o Uphold political neutrality
o Loyal to their ministers
- This distinction:
Most clear in parliamentary systems
Overlap in presidential systems
Communist regimes – the distinction is redundant
- There are various levels of status and responsibilities within the executive – members are not
equal – hierarchical structure organized according to a leadership structure:
1. Head of the state – President – largely symbolic authority and importance
2. Head of the government/chief executive – PM – carries our policy-making and political
responsibilities
3. Ministers and secretaries
Have the responsibility of developing and implementing policy in specific areas
Hierarchy amongst them as well – either due to
o The importance of their policy areas or
o Due to the entitlement to sit in the cabinet or senior committees
4. Bureaucrats and administrators – concerned with policy implementation
5. Enforcement agencies
Police, armed forces
Quasi-governmental bodies – ‘quangos’
Help put government policy into effect
However, the personnel are independent of the government
- The role of Cabinets:
Policy-making power through collective leadership
Offer advice
Coordinate executive policy
- The political executive – provides leadership – performs the following roles:
Ceremonial duties
Control of policy-making
Popular political leadership
Bureaucratic management
Crisis response
- Ceremonial Leadership
These executives ‘stand for’ the state
They represent the larger society and its unity
Largely formal and ceremonial role
Their role:
o Provides a focus for unity and political loyalty - helps to build legitimacy
o Foreign relations
o Allows those at the top of the executive to portray themselves as ‘national
leaders’ - vital to the maintenance of public support and electoral credibility
- Policy-making Leadership
Their function is to direct and control the policy-making process
They are expected to ‘govern’
They are supposed to develop coherent economic and social programs
They must control the state’s external relations in an increasingly interdependent world
As a result, their legislative powers are increasing
- Popular Leadership
The popularity of the executive – crucial to the character and stability of the regime
The ability of the executive to mobilize support ensures compliance and cooperation of
the general public (popular support from people, charisma)
Without support from the public – policy implementation is difficult
The political executive’s authority – linked to the legitimacy of the regime
- Bureaucratic Leadership
Executives have bureaucratic and administrative responsibilities
They oversee policy implementation
Therefore, they make up the ‘top management’ – run the machinery of the government
Senior ministers – have responsibility for particular policy areas
Bureaucrats – administer those areas
Policy coordination done through the cabinet
- Crisis Leadership
Executives have the ability to take swift and decisive action
When crisis breaks out, the executive responds due to the scope for personal leadership
provided by its hierarchical structure
Therefore – assemblies may grant executives near-dictatorial power in times of crisis
– ‘emergency powers’ – ‘states of emergency’
- 3 dimensions of power
Formal – the constitutional roles of executive officers
Informal – the role of personality, political skills, relationship with parties and the media
External – political, economic, and diplomatic context of the government – pressures on
the executive branch (e.g., pressure from the military)
- President
A formal head of the state
Constitutional/non-executive vs executive presidents
Constitutional/non-executive presidents
o Parliamentary systems
o Responsibilities confined to ceremonial duties
o A mere figurehead
o Main executive power is with the PM and/or cabinet
Executive presidents
o Presidential systems
o Their powers may be limited or unlimited
o Limited by constitutional constraints, democracy, party competition, separation
of powers (legislative, executive, judicial), and a popularly elected assembly –
Congress as opposition parties in the USA – can impeach the president
o Unlimited – president invested with near-unchecked powers - dictatorships
Semi-Presidential systems
o Combination of presidential and parliamentary systems
o A separately elected president invested with executive powers
o A government with a PM and a cabinet - drawn from and accountable to the
assembly
- Prime Ministers
Parliamentary systems – parliamentary executives
Accompanied by a constitutional or non-executive president – fills ceremonial duties
This parliamentary political executive is drawn from the assembly
The executive – responsible to the assembly – his government only survives if it has the
assembly’s confidence
Greater pressure on the PM for collective decision-making and collaboration
Cabinet has high power
Two sets of key PM relationships:
o Relationships with cabinet, individual ministers, government departments
o Relationship with one’s party, assembly, and the public
PM power has grown in recent years due to:
o Tendency to focus on personalities (through media)
o The growth of international politics – PMs as statesmen
o Their control of the cabinet system – ability to appoint cabinet members
o Ability to dominate the assembly as leaders of the largest party
o Access to media – appealing to voters
- Cabinet
Cabinets enable the government to present a collective face to the assembly and public
– without it, a government could be perceived as a personal tool used by one individual
Ensure effective coordination of government
Presidential systems:
o Cabinets serve the president
o Act as policy advisers
Rise of PM power:
o Ensures that most decisions are made elsewhere and reach the cabinet in a
prepackaged form
o Weakens the cabinet – strengthens the PM’s control
o Cabinets have to remain loyal to the PM
- Democratic politics – has placed constraints on leadership by:
Making leaders accountable
Establishing an institutional mechanism through which they can be held accountable
and removed
- Democracy has increased the importance of personality – forced political leaders to ‘project
themselves’ in the hope of gaining electoral support
- Modern means of mass communication and media – provided politicians with the means to:
Emphasize personalities rather than policies
Act as weapons to manipulate their public images
Communicate their personal vision to people, which might attract the public
- Theories of Leadership
A natural gift
A sociological phenomenon
An organizational necessity
A political skill
- A natural gift
Nature
Some people are destined to be leaders
o Extreme manifestation – Fascist leaders - Ubermensch – rises above ‘herd
mentality’
o Modest manifestation – charisma – power of personality
Leadership as a strictly individual quality
How authentic? - Cults of personality
Harold Lasswell – leaders are motivated by their own pathological needs for power and
then justify it by claiming to work for the people
James Barber – categorizations of ‘presidential character’ – US presidents –
psychological phenomenon in terms of human personality
o Active or passive – in terms of the energy they put into their jobs
o Positive or negative – how they feel about political office
o 4 categorizations:
1. Active-positive
2. Active-negative
3. Passive-positive
4. Passive-negative
- A sociological phenomenon
Nature
Leaders are ‘created’ by socio-historical forces
o Marxists
Historical development is structured by economic factors and a class
struggle
Personalities of individual leaders – less important than the class
interests they stand for
Society creates leaders – a manifestation of class differences
o Collective behavior as a basis for political leadership:
Crowd psychology
Leaders impelled by the collective behavior of the masses
- Organizational Necessity
Leadership - an organizational necessity - arises from the need for coherence, unity, and
direction
Legal-rational authority
- A political skill
Leadership as a political skill that can be learned or practiced
Cults of personality – a skill of manipulation – manufactured charisma - speeches,
media, rallies, party members
Emotional intelligence – balance between rational and emotional - 4 key competencies:
o Self-awareness
o Self-management
o Empathy
o Relationship management
- 3 leadership styles
Laissez-faire leadership
o Reluctance of the leader to interfere in matters outside his or her personal
responsibility
o Subordinates – given greater responsibility
o Fosters teamwork, harmony, and network
o Allows leaders to concentrate on political and electoral matters
o However, it can also lead to weak communication and the PM being unaware of
what his subordinates are doing
Transactional leadership
o Transactional leaders adopt a positive role in policy-making and government
management
o Negotiation and transactions
o Motivated by pragmatic goals and considerations
Transformational leadership
o The leader is an inspirer or visionary
o Motivated by strong ideological convictions
o Have the will power to put these into practice
o Mobilize support from within the government, political parties, and the public
- Problems faced by political leaders:
Failure to live up to high expectations that are formulated due to global influences
Old ideological narratives breaking down – hard to formulate new compelling narratives
to have wide support
Modern societies – diverse and fragmented – hard to construct a political appeal based
on common culture
Political leaders – tend to be viewed as self-serving and out of touch
CLASS NOTES
- Military – cannot check the chief executive’s power because it comes under the government
- Bodies that can check the executive in a Liberal democracy:
Judiciary
Opposition parties
Legislature
The public through voting
Cabinet – members of their own party
- Bills – how the executive proposes laws
- Russia and China – have parliaments, but their presidents have specialized powers, which may
often be skewed toward the president