PARNAI HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (3 x 12.

50 MW)

DESIGN REPORT ON APPROACH BRIDGE

Document No.: 7061396.63 (R0)

August, 2021
DOCUMENT/REPORT CONTROL FORM

File Location Name: H:\Projects\Parnai Detail Engineering\H - Deliverables\H1 - Reports\63 Report

Project Name: PARNAI HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT

Project Number: 7061396

Revision Number: R0

Revision History
Revision # Date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved for Issue by

R0 28-08-2021 Shamik Singha Roy Amit Srivastava Neeta Arora

Issue Register

Distribution List Date Issued Number of Copies

Patel Engineering Limited. 28-08-2021 1

Amit Srivastava 28-08-2021 1

Office Library [Gurgaon] 28-08-2021 1

SMEC Project File 28-08-2021 1

SMEC Company Details

SMEC (India) Pvt. Ltd.
1st Floor, West Wing, Novus Tower,
Plot-18, Sec-18, Gurugram, Haryana, 122 008, India
Tel: (91) 124 - 4552800, 4501100 Fax: (91) 124 - 4380043
Email: [email protected] Website: www.smec.com
[email protected]

The information within this document is and shall remain the property of SMEC (India) Pvt. Ltd.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 MODEL GEOMETRY ................................................................................................................... 1

2 DESIGN LOADS ........................................................................................................................... 4
3 DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS .............................................................................................. 7

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 |Page | i

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

El Elevation
FRL Full Reservoir Level
HEP Hydroelectric Project
m Meter
MW Mega Watt
RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete
kN Kilo Newton
sq. m Square meter
IS Indian Standard
SMEC Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 |Page | ii

1 MODEL GEOMETRY

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 1

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 2
Size of Corbel at the top of Fishpass-2 wall
Depth at support – 1m
Depth at free end - 0.75
Width of Corbel - 0.6m
Size of Column
Depth of Column - 0.35m
Width of Column - 0.35m
Size of Beam
Depth of Beam - 0.4m
Width of Beam - 0.35m
Size of Deck Slab
Length of Deck Slab - 5.062m
Carriageway width - 6.0m
Thickness of Deck slab - Average thickness is 265mm (Max. at centre 300mm and 230mm near
parapet wall.

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 3

Size of Raft (on the right bank for Column support)
Width of Raft - 1m
Length of raft - 6.55m
Thickness of Raft - 300 mm

2 DESIGN LOADS
1. Dead Load (DL)

The self-weight of the structure has been automatically included in STAAD considering the
unit weight of concrete.
2. Load due to Crash barrier (CB)

The Parapet wall of 1m high and 0.15m thick load taken as UDL. Calculated load is = 1 x
0.15x25 = 3.75 kN/m

3. Load due to wearing Coat (WC)

Considering thickness of wearing coat as 100mm, load due to wearing coat taken as (0.1 x
23.6) = 2.36 kN/m2

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 4

4. Live load over pedestrian (LL)

As per Cl. 206.1 of IRC 6-2014, live load equivalent to 5 kN/m2 is considered over the
pedestrian.

5. Vehicle Live Load (VL)

As per table -2 of IRC 6-2014, 2 lane Class A vehicle and 70R wheeled vehicle load has been
considered in the analysis as shown in below figure:

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 5

Class A vehicle load details as per IRC -6 (2014)

Here, 0.4m gap from the pedestrian to 1st Class A vehicle has been considered. Similarly, the gap
between the two Class-A vehicle taken as 0.8m.

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 6

 70R (wheeled) vehicle load details as per IRC -6 (2014)

Here, 1.07m gap from the pedestrian to 70R wheeled vehicle has been considered.

3 DESIGN LOAD COMBINATIONS

As per Table 3.2 of IRC 6-2014, following partial factor of safety has been considered in
design analysis:

1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (2 lane Class A)

1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (70R wheeled vehicle)

For design analysis and calculation details, please refer Annexure -I

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 7

ANNEXURE –I

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 8

 ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF DECK SLAB (0.265 m THICK)

DESIGN DATA

Grade of Steel reinforcement, f y = 500 N/mm2

Grade of Concrete, fck = 25 N/mm2

Clear cover to Stirrup = 35 mm

Dia of Main Bar = 16 mm

Dia of Distribution Bar = 16 mm

Assume Effective Cover = 59 mm

Overall thickness 't' of Deck Slab = 265.0 mm

Width of Wall 'B' considered = 1000.0 mm

Effective depth provided (d) = 265 - 59

= 206.0 mm

Critical Load Case - 1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (70R wheeled vehicle)

DESIGN FOR REINFORCEMENT ALONG THE ROAD ALIGNMENT

Load Case (Element no - 14072) = 13

Moment My = 75 kNm

Moment Mxy = 2.8 kNm

Total Design Moment = 77.8 kNm

Load Factor = 1

Designed Factored Moment = 77.8 kNm

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 1

 Check for Effective Depth, d

Required effective depth, d = 152.966 mm

Actual effective depth provided = 206.0 mm

< Hence O.K

Mu/bd2 = 1.833
% of Steel Required, Ast = 0.46 % (using Table 3 of
SP16)
As per Cl. No. 26.5.2.1 of IS 456,

Minimum area of Steel required = 0.12 % of gross area

Percentage of Steel to be provided = MAX(0.46,0.12)

= 0.460 %

Area of steel required = 0.46 x 1000 x 206 /100

= 947.60 mm2
Assumed Bar diameter = 16 mm

Area of each bar = 201.00 mm2

Spacing Required = 212.115 m

Spacing Provided = 125.000 m

Actual Ast provided = 1608.0 mm2

% of steel provided = 100 x 1608 / (1000 x 206)

= 0.781 %

PROVIDE 16 Ø TOR BAR along the road alignment @ 125 mm C/C at top and bottom of raft.

DESIGN CHECK FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 2

 Load Case = 15
Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.541 N/mm2

Load Factor = 1
Factored Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.541 N/mm2

Width, b = 1000.0 mm

Effective Depth, d = 206.0 mm

Grade of Steel for Shear reinforcement, f y = 415 N/mm2

Max permissible shear-tvmax = 3.1 N/mm2

(for M25 grade concrete) o.k

% of tension steel provided = 0.781 %

(Ref: Table-19 of IS 456:2000 )

Shear strength of M25 concrete for tension steel provided , tc

= 0.584 N/mm2
( Refer Table - 19, IS 456-2000)

> 0.541 N/mm2

Hence, Safe in Shear

DESIGN FOR REINFORCEMENT ACROSS THE ROAD ALIGNMENT

Load Case (Element no - 14071) = 23

Moment My = 36.5 kNm

Moment Mxy = 4 kNm

Total Design Moment = 40.5 kNm

Load Factor = 1

Designed Factored Moment = 40.5 kNm

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 3

 Check for Effective Depth, d

Required effective depth, d = 110.365 mm

Actual effective depth provided = 206.0 mm

< Hence O.K

Mu/bd2 = 0.954
% of Steel Required, Ast = 0.23 % (using Table 3 of
SP16)
As per Cl. No. 26.5.2.1 of IS 456,

Minimum area of Steel required = 0.12 % of gross area

Percentage of Steel to be provided = MAX(0.23,0.12)

= 0.230 %

Area of steel required = 0.23 x 1000 x 206 /100

= 473.80 mm2
Assumed Bar diameter = 16 mm

Area of each bar = 201.00 mm2

Spacing Required = 424.230 m

Spacing Provided = 250.000 m

Actual Ast provided = 804.0 mm2

% of steel provided = 100 x 804 / (1000 x 206)

= 0.390 %

PROVIDE 16 Ø TOR BAR across the road alignment @ 250 mm C/C at top and bottom of raft.

DESIGN CHECK FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

It has been observed that maximum

shear stress concentration is lies over
only one plate which can be ignored in
analysis

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 4

 Load Case = 9
Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.395 N/mm2

Load Factor = 1
Factored Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.395 N/mm2

Width, b = 1000.0 mm

Effective Depth, d = 206.0 mm

Grade of Steel for Shear reinforcement, f y = 415 N/mm2

Max permissible shear-tvmax = 3.1 N/mm2

(for M25 grade concrete) o.k

% of tension steel provided = 0.390 %

(Ref: Table-19 of IS 456:2000 )

Shear strength of M25 concrete for tension steel provided , tc
= 0.441 N/mm2
( Refer Table - 19, IS 456-2000)

> 0.395 N/mm2

Hence, Safe in Shear

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 5

 DESIGN OF BEAM (350 X 400)

Critical Load Case - 1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (2 lane Class A)

Load Case 41.00 34.00

Moment (Knm) 82.10 43.00
fck (Mpa) 25.00 25.00
fy (Mpa) 500.00 500.00
Des. Mu (Knm) 82.10 43.00
Mulim (Knm) 155.04 155.04
ptlim 0.9435 0.9435
D (mm) 400.00 400.00
d (mm) 365.00 365.00
b (mm) 350.00 350.00
d' (mm) for At 35.00 35.00
d' (mm) for Asc 35.00 35.00
Es 200000.00 200000.00
pt1 0.4445 0.2219
At1 (mm2) 567.79 283.45
xumax/d 166.44 166.44 Bar diameter = 16 mm
ecc at Asc Level 0.002764 0.002764 Nos of Bars Required = 2.824 Nos
ssc (Mpa) 412.745 412.745 Nos of Bars Provided = 4.000 Nos
Asc (mm2) 0.000 0.000 Actual Ast provided = 804.25 mm2
pc 0.0000 0.0000 Actual pt provided = 0.63 %
At2 (mm2) 0.0000 0.0000
pt2 0.0000 0.0000
567.79 283.45
Total pt 0.4445 0.2219 Provide 2L 10 dia stirrup @ 125mm c/c
pmin IS13920 0.2400 0.2400
pmin IS456 0.1700 0.1700

V (KN) 71.10 175.00

Vu (KN) 71.10 175.00
Vs (KN) 2.562 106.462
M (KN-Mt) 82.10 43.00
tana 0.000 0.000
th (Mpa) 0.5566 1.3699
ptprovided 0.6295 0.6295
tc.(Mpa) 0.5365 0.5365
Asv(mm2) 157.08 157.08
sv(mm) 300.00 234.26

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 6

 DESIGN OF COLUMN (350 X 350) SUPPORTED ABOVE CORBEL

Size of column

Width, b = 350.0 mm

Depth, d = 350.0 mm
Grade of Concrete, fck = 25.0 N/mm2
Grade of Steel reinforcement, f y = 500.0 N/mm2

Y b

d
Load Case (70R Vehicle Load) - 13 (Maximum My and corresponding Axial & Mz)

Axial force on column, Pu = 297 KN

Load Factor = 1

Factored Axial force on column, Pu = 297.0 KN

Moment about Y; Muy = 133.0 KNm

Factored moment about Y; Muy = 133.0 KNm

Moment about Z; Muz = 8.0 KNm

Factored moment about Z; Muz = 8.0 KNm

Unsupported Length of Column ,Lyy = 1.85 m
Unsupported Length of Column ,Lzz = 1.85 m
Effective Length Ratio for Lyy = 1.00
Effective Length Ratio for Lzz = 1.00
Effective Length, Leyy = 1.850 m
Effective Length, Lezz = 1.850

Check for Slenderness Ratio

Leyy / Dy = (1.85 x 1000 / 350) = 5.3 < 12

(Ref:IS 456:2000)
Lezz / Dz = (1.85 x 1000 / 350) = 5.3 < 12

Hence ,the Column may be designed as a Shot Column.

Check for Minimum Eccentricity Moments

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Minimum eccentricity about yy
= 20.00 mm
eymin=(1.85x1000/500+350/30)>=20mm
Minnimum eccentricity moment about YY Muy = 5.94 KNm (Ref:IS 456:2000,Cl.
Minimum eccentricity about zz 25.4)
= 20.00 mm
ezmin=(1.85x1000/500+350/30)>=20mm
Minnimum eccentricity moment about zz Muz = 5.94 KNm

Design moment (Factored) about YY Muy = 133.0 KNm

Design moment (Factored) about YY Muy = 8.0 KNm

The Column is designed for biaxial bending with reinforcement divided equally on four sides.

Uniaxial moment capacities of column about y-y axis & z-z axis.

Assume reinforcement 'p' = 3.000 %

Diameter of Main Reinforcing Bar -1 = 25 mm

Area of Each Reinforcing Bar = 490.87 mm2

Area of Total Reinforcement required = 3675.00 mm2
Number of Bars required in column = 7.49 Nos

Provide Numbers of bar in column = 8.00 Nos

Actual Reinforcement (As) provided in Columns = 3926.99 mm2

Actual Reinforcement 'p' = 3.21 %
Constant p/fck = 3.21 / 25

= 0.128

About y-y axis

Clear Cover = 50.0 mm

Dia of Main bar = 25 mm

Effective cover to reinforcement d' = (50+25 / 2) = 62.5 mm

Factor d'/d = (62.5 / 350) = 0.179

Factor Pu/fckbd = 297 x 1000 / (25 x 350 x 350)

= 0.097
2
Muy1/fckdb = 0.155 (Ref:chart 49, SP-16)

Moment carrying capacity of column, MUy1 = 0.155 x 25 x 350 x 350^2

= 166.140625 KNm

About z-z axis

Effective cover to reinforcement d' = 62.5 mm

Factor d'/b = (62.5 / 350) = 0.179

Factor Pu / fckbd = 297 x 1000 / (25 x 350 x 350)

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 = 0.097

Muz1 / fckbd2 = 0.155 (Ref:chart 49, SP-16)

Moment carrying capacity of column, MUz1 = 0.155 x 25 x 350 x 350^2

= 166.140625 KNm

Calculation of P z and a n

Pz = 0.45fckAg + (0.75 fy - 0.45 fck) As = 2714.91 KN

Pu / Pz = (297 / 2714.91) KN

= 0.109 (Ref:IS 456:2000,Cl.

39.6)
an = 1.000

Criteria for Biaxial Bending

Muy / Muy1 = 133 / 166.140625

= 0.800
Muz / Muz1 = 8 / 166.140625

= 0.050
an an
(Muy/Muy1) + (Muz/Muz1) = 0.8^1 + 0.05^1

= 0.85

Column is Safe

Provide 8 Nos of 25 mm Dia Reinforcing Bars.

Transverse Reinforcement

Minimum diameter of the transverse bars required shall be

( IS 456:2000 )
a) One fourth of the longitudinal bar > 25 / 4

> 6.25 mm

b) Not Less than 6 mm < 6 mm

Diameter to be provided = 8 mm

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Spacing of transverse steel shall be least of

a) Least dimension of compression member = 350.0 mm

b) Sixteen times the smallest dia of longitudinal bar = 400 mm

c) 300 mm = 300 mm

Spacing of transverse steel required = Min(350, 400, 300)

= 300.0 mm

Spacing of transverse steel provided 150 mm

Provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 150mm c/c as transverse steel in column

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 DESIGN OF COLUMN (350 X 350) SUPPORTED ABOVE CORBEL

Size of column

Width, b = 350.0 mm

Depth, d = 350.0 mm
Grade of Concrete, fck = 25.0 N/mm2
Grade of Steel reinforcement, f y = 500.0 N/mm2

Y b

d
Load Case (70R Vehicle Load) - 18 (Maximum Axial and corresponding My & Mz)

Axial force on column, Pu = 503 KN

Load Factor = 1

Factored Axial force on column, Pu = 503.0 KN

Moment about Y; Muy = 18.2 KNm

Factored moment about Y; Muy = 18.2 KNm

Moment about Z; Muz = 1.2 KNm

Factored moment about Z; Muz = 1.2 KNm

Unsupported Length of Column ,Lyy = 1.85 m
Unsupported Length of Column ,Lzz = 1.85 m
Effective Length Ratio for Lyy = 1.00
Effective Length Ratio for Lzz = 1.00
Effective Length, Leyy = 1.850 m
Effective Length, Lezz = 1.850

Check for Slenderness Ratio

Leyy / Dy = (1.85 x 1000 / 350) = 5.3 < 12

(Ref:IS 456:2000)
Lezz / Dz = (1.85 x 1000 / 350) = 5.3 < 12

Hence ,the Column may be designed as a Shot Column.

Check for Minimum Eccentricity Moments

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Minimum eccentricity about yy
= 20.00 mm
eymin=(1.85x1000/500+350/30)>=20mm
Minnimum eccentricity moment about YY Muy = 10.06 KNm (Ref:IS 456:2000,Cl.
Minimum eccentricity about zz 25.4)
= 20.00 mm
ezmin=(1.85x1000/500+350/30)>=20mm
Minnimum eccentricity moment about zz Muz = 10.06 KNm

Design moment (Factored) about YY Muy = 18.2 KNm

Design moment (Factored) about YY Muy = 10.1 KNm

The Column is designed for biaxial bending with reinforcement divided equally on four sides.

Uniaxial moment capacities of column about y-y axis & z-z axis.

Assume reinforcement 'p' = 3.000 %

Diameter of Main Reinforcing Bar -1 = 25 mm

Area of Each Reinforcing Bar = 490.87 mm2

Area of Total Reinforcement required = 3675.00 mm2
Number of Bars required in column = 7.49 Nos

Provide Numbers of bar in column = 8.00 Nos

Actual Reinforcement (As) provided in Columns = 3926.99 mm2

Actual Reinforcement 'p' = 3.21 %
Constant p/fck = 3.21 / 25

= 0.128

About y-y axis

Clear Cover = 50.0 mm

Dia of Main bar = 25 mm

Effective cover to reinforcement d' = (50+25 / 2) = 62.5 mm

Factor d'/d = (62.5 / 350) = 0.179

Factor Pu/fckbd = 503 x 1000 / (25 x 350 x 350)

= 0.164

Muy1/fckdb2 = 0.155 (Ref:chart 49, SP-16)

Moment carrying capacity of column, MUy1 = 0.155 x 25 x 350 x 350^2

= 166.140625 KNm

About z-z axis

Effective cover to reinforcement d' = 62.5 mm

Factor d'/b = (62.5 / 350) = 0.179

Factor Pu / fckbd = 503 x 1000 / (25 x 350 x 350)

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 = 0.164

Muz1 / fckbd2 = 0.155 (Ref:chart 49, SP-16)

Moment carrying capacity of column, MUz1 = 0.155 x 25 x 350 x 350^2

= 166.140625 KNm

Calculation of P z and a n

Pz = 0.45fckAg + (0.75 fy - 0.45 fck) As = 2714.91 KN

Pu / Pz = (503 / 2714.91) KN

= 0.185 (Ref:IS 456:2000,Cl.

39.6)
an = 1.000

Criteria for Biaxial Bending

Muy / Muy1 = 18.2 / 166.140625

= 0.110
Muz / Muz1 = 10.06 / 166.140625

= 0.060
an an
(Muy/Muy1) + (Muz/Muz1) = 0.11^1 + 0.06^1

= 0.17

Column is Safe

Provide 8 Nos of 25 mm Dia Reinforcing Bars.

Transverse Reinforcement

Minimum diameter of the transverse bars required shall be

( IS 456:2000 )
a) One fourth of the longitudinal bar > 25 / 4

> 6.25 mm

b) Not Less than 6 mm < 6 mm

Diameter to be provided = 8 mm

Spacing of transverse steel shall be least of

a) Least dimension of compression member = 350.0 mm

b) Sixteen times the smallest dia of longitudinal bar = 400 mm

c) 300 mm = 300 mm

Spacing of transverse steel required = Min(350, 400, 300)

= 300.0 mm

Spacing of transverse steel provided 150 mm

Provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 150mm c/c as transverse steel in column

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 DESIGN OF COLUMN (350 X 350) SUPPORTED ON RAFT SLAB

Size of column

Width, b = 350.0 mm

Depth, d = 350.0 mm
Grade of Concrete, fck = 25.0 N/mm2
Grade of Steel reinforcement, f y = 500.0 N/mm2

Y b

d
Load Case (70R Vehicle Load) - 23 (Maximum My and corresponding Axial & Mz)

Axial force on column, Pu = 293 KN

Load Factor = 1

Factored Axial force on column, Pu = 293.0 KN

Moment about Y; Muy = 66.0 KNm

Factored moment about Y; Muy = 66.0 KNm

Moment about Z; Muz = 15.0 KNm

Factored moment about Z; Muz = 15.0 KNm

Unsupported Length of Column ,Lyy = 0.60 m
Unsupported Length of Column ,Lzz = 0.60 m
Effective Length Ratio for Lyy = 1.00
Effective Length Ratio for Lzz = 1.00
Effective Length, Leyy = 0.600 m
Effective Length, Lezz = 0.600

Check for Slenderness Ratio

Leyy / Dy = (0.6 x 1000 / 350) = 1.7 < 12

(Ref:IS 456:2000)
Lezz / Dz = (0.6 x 1000 / 350) = 1.7 < 12

Hence ,the Column may be designed as a Shot Column.

Check for Minimum Eccentricity Moments

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Minimum eccentricity about yy
= 20.00 mm
eymin=(0.6x1000/500+350/30)>=20mm
Minnimum eccentricity moment about YY Muy = 5.86 KNm (Ref:IS 456:2000,Cl.
Minimum eccentricity about zz 25.4)
= 20.00 mm
ezmin=(0.6x1000/500+350/30)>=20mm
Minnimum eccentricity moment about zz Muz = 5.86 KNm

Design moment (Factored) about YY Muy = 66.0 KNm

Design moment (Factored) about YY Muy = 15.0 KNm

The Column is designed for biaxial bending with reinforcement divided equally on four sides.

Uniaxial moment capacities of column about y-y axis & z-z axis.

Assume reinforcement 'p' = 2.000 %

Diameter of Main Reinforcing Bar -1 = 20 mm

Area of Each Reinforcing Bar = 314.16 mm2

Area of Total Reinforcement required = 2450.00 mm2
Number of Bars required in column = 7.80 Nos

Provide Numbers of bar in column = 8.00 Nos

Actual Reinforcement (As) provided in Columns = 2513.27 mm2

Actual Reinforcement 'p' = 2.05 %
Constant p/fck = 2.05 / 25

= 0.082

About y-y axis

Clear Cover = 50.0 mm

Dia of Main bar = 20 mm

Effective cover to reinforcement d' = (50+20 / 2) = 60 mm

Factor d'/d = (60 / 350) = 0.171

Factor Pu/fckbd = 293 x 1000 / (25 x 350 x 350)

= 0.096

Muy1/fckdb2 = 0.12 (Ref:chart 49, SP-16)

Moment carrying capacity of column, MUy1 = 0.12 x 25 x 350 x 350^2

= 128.625 KNm

About z-z axis

Effective cover to reinforcement d' = 60 mm

Factor d'/b = (60 / 350) = 0.171

Factor Pu / fckbd = 293 x 1000 / (25 x 350 x 350)

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 = 0.096

Muz1 / fckbd2 = 0.12 (Ref:chart 49, SP-16)

Moment carrying capacity of column, MUz1 = 0.12 x 25 x 350 x 350^2

= 128.625 KNm

Calculation of P z and a n

Pz = 0.45fckAg + (0.75 fy - 0.45 fck) As = 2269.31 KN

Pu / Pz = (293 / 2269.31) KN

= 0.129 (Ref:IS 456:2000,Cl.

39.6)
an = 1.000

Criteria for Biaxial Bending

Muy / Muy1 = 66 / 128.625

= 0.510
Muz / Muz1 = 15 / 128.625

= 0.120
an an
(Muy/Muy1) + (Muz/Muz1) = 0.51^1 + 0.12^1

= 0.63

Column is Safe

Provide 8 Nos of 20 mm Dia Reinforcing Bars.

Transverse Reinforcement

Minimum diameter of the transverse bars required shall be

( IS 456:2000 )
a) One fourth of the longitudinal bar > 20 / 4

> 5 mm

b) Not Less than 6 mm < 6 mm

Diameter to be provided = 8 mm

Spacing of transverse steel shall be least of

a) Least dimension of compression member = 350.0 mm

b) Sixteen times the smallest dia of longitudinal bar = 320 mm

c) 300 mm = 300 mm

Spacing of transverse steel required = Min(350, 320, 300)

= 300.0 mm

Spacing of transverse steel provided 150 mm

Provide 8 mm diameter bar @ 150mm c/c as transverse steel in column

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF RAFT FOOTING (0.3 m THICK)

DESIGN DATA

Grade of Steel reinforcement, f y = 500 N/mm2

Grade of Concrete, fck = 25 N/mm2

Clear cover to Stirrup = 50 mm

Dia of Main Bar = 20 mm

Dia of Distribution Bar = 12 mm

Assume Effective Cover = 76 mm

Overall thickness Raft = 300.0 mm

Width of Wall 'B' considered = 1000.0 mm

Effective depth provided (d) = 300 - 76

= 224.0 mm

Critical Load Case - 1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (70R wheeled vehicle)

DESIGN FOR REINFORCEMENT ACROSS THE ROAD ALIGNMENT

Load Case (Element no - 14681) = 25

Moment My = 56 kNm

Moment Mxy = 1 kNm

Total Design Moment = 57 kNm

Load Factor = 1

Designed Factored Moment = 57 kNm

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Check for Effective Depth, d

Required effective depth, d = 130.931 mm

Actual effective depth provided = 224.0 mm

< Hence O.K

Mu/bd2 = 1.136
% of Steel Required, Ast = 0.28 % (using Table 3 of
SP16)
As per Cl. No. 26.5.2.1 of IS 456,

Minimum area of Steel required = 0.12 % of gross area

Percentage of Steel to be provided = MAX(0.28,0.12)

= 0.280 %

Area of steel required = 0.28 x 1000 x 224 /100

= 627.20 mm2
Assumed Bar diameter = 20 mm

Area of each bar = 314.00 mm2

Spacing Required = 500.638 m

Spacing Provided = 175.000 m

Actual Ast provided = 1794.3 mm2

% of steel provided = 100 x 1794.29 / (1000 x 224)

= 0.801 %

PROVIDE 20 Ø TOR BAR along the road alignment @ 175 mm C/C at top and bottom of raft.

DESIGN CHECK FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Load Case = 25
Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.574 N/mm2

Load Factor = 1
Factored Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.574 N/mm2

Width, b = 1000.0 mm

Effective Depth, d = 224.0 mm

Grade of Steel for Shear reinforcement, f y = 415 N/mm2

Max permissible shear-tvmax = 3.1 N/mm2

(for M25 grade concrete) o.k

% of tension steel provided = 0.801 %

(Ref: Table-19 of IS 456:2000 )

Shear strength of M25 concrete for tension steel provided , tc

= 0.59 N/mm2
( Refer Table - 19, IS 456-2000)

> 0.574 N/mm2

Hence, Safe in Shear

DESIGN FOR REINFORCEMENT ALONG THE ROAD ALIGNMENT

Load Case (Element no - 14071) = 25

Moment My = 17 kNm

Moment Mxy = 1 kNm

Total Design Moment = 18 kNm

Load Factor = 1

Designed Factored Moment = 18 kNm

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Check for Effective Depth, d

Required effective depth, d = 73.5767 mm

Actual effective depth provided = 224.0 mm

< Hence O.K

Mu/bd2 = 0.359
% of Steel Required, Ast = 0.08 % (using Table 3 of
SP16)
As per Cl. No. 26.5.2.1 of IS 456,

Minimum area of Steel required = 0.12 % of gross area

Percentage of Steel to be provided = MAX(0.08,0.12)

= 0.120 %

Area of steel required = 0.12 x 1000 x 224 /100

= 268.80 mm2
Assumed Bar diameter = 12 mm

Area of each bar = 113.00 mm2

Spacing Required = 420.387 m

Spacing Provided = 200.000 m

Actual Ast provided = 565.0 mm2

% of steel provided = 100 x 565 / (1000 x 224)

= 0.252 %

PROVIDE 12 Ø TOR BAR across the road alignment @ 200 mm C/C at top and bottom of raft.

DESIGN CHECK FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Load Case = 25
Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.355 N/mm2

Load Factor = 1
Factored Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.355 N/mm2

Width, b = 1000.0 mm

Effective Depth, d = 224.0 mm

Grade of Steel for Shear reinforcement, f y = 415 N/mm2

Max permissible shear-tvmax = 3.1 N/mm2

(for M25 grade concrete) o.k

% of tension steel provided = 0.252 %

(Ref: Table-19 of IS 456:2000 )

Shear strength of M25 concrete for tension steel provided , tc
= 0.366 N/mm2
( Refer Table - 19, IS 456-2000)

> 0.355 N/mm2

Hence, Safe in Shear

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF FISHPASS-2 Wall ( 0.75 m THICK)

DESIGN DATA

Grade of Steel reinforcement, f y = 500 N/mm2

Grade of Concrete, fck = 25 N/mm2

Clear cover to Stirrup = 75 mm

Dia of Main Bar (vertical) = 20 mm

Dia of Distribution Bar (horizontal) = 16 mm

Assume Effective Cover = 103 mm

Overall thickness 't' of Wall = 750.0 mm

Width of Wall 'B' considered = 1000.0 mm

Effective depth provided (d) = 750 - 103

= 647.0 mm

HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENTS FOR WALL

Critical Load Case - 1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (2 lane Class A)

Load Case (Element no - 14471) = 35

Moment My = 58 kNm

Moment Mxy = 22 kNm

Total Design Moment = 80 kNm

Load Factor = 1

Designed Factored Moment = 80 kNm

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Check for Effective Depth, d

Required effective depth, d = 155.1133 mm

Actual effective depth provided = 647.0 mm

< Hence O.K

2
Mu/bd = 0.191
% of Steel Required, Ast = 0.04 % (using Table 3 of
SP16)
As per Cl. No. 26.5.2.1 of IS 456,

Minimum area of Steel required = 0.12 % of gross area

Percentage of Steel to be provided = MAX(0.04,0.12)

= 0.120 %

Area of steel required = 0.12 x 1000 x 647 /100

= 776.40 mm2
Assumed Bar diameter = 16 mm

Area of each bar = 201.00 mm2

Spacing Required = 258.887 m

Spacing Provided = 200.000 m

Actual Ast provided = 1005.0 mm2

% of steel provided = 100 x 1005 / (1000 x 647)

= 0.155 %

PROVIDE 16 Ø TOR BAR @ 200 mm C/C on both face of Wall.

VERTICAL REINFORCEMENTS FOR WALL

Critical Load Case - 1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (70R wheeled vehicle)

Clear cover to Stirrup = 75 mm

Dia of Main Bar (vertical) = 20 mm

Dia of Distribution Bar (horizontal) = 16 mm

Assume Effective Cover = 103 mm

Overall thickness 't' of Raft = 750.0 mm

Width of Wall 'B' considered = 1000.0 mm

Effective depth provided (d) = 750 - 103

= 647.0 mm

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Load Case (Element no - 14485) = 9

Moment My = 95 kNm

Moment Mxy = 1 kNm

Total Design Moment = 96 kNm

Load Factor = 1

Designed Factored Moment = 96 kNm

Check for Effective Depth, d

Required effective depth, d = 169.9182 mm

Actual effective depth provided = 647.0 mm

< Hence O.K

2
Mu/bd = 0.229
% of Steel Required, Ast = 0.05 % (using Table 3 of
SP16)
As per Cl. No. 26.5.2.1 of IS 456,

Minimum area of Steel required = 0.12 % of gross area

Percentage of Steel to be provided = MAX(0.05,0.12)

= 0.120 %

Area of steel required = 0.12 x 1000 x 647 /100

= 776.40 mm2
Assumed Bar diameter = 20 mm

Area of each bar = 314.00 mm2

Spacing Required = 404.431 m

Spacing Provided = 200.000 m

Actual Ast provided = 1570.0 mm2

% of steel provided = 100 x 1570 / (1000 x 647)

= 0.243 %

PROVIDE 20 Ø TOR BAR @ 200 mm C/C on both face of Raft.

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 DESIGN CHECK FOR SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

SQx for Load Case - 9 (2 lane Class A vehicle)

SQy for Load Case - 18 (70R wheeled Vehicle)

As seen maximum shear stress intensity are lies just beside the C/L location of Corbel. Since corbel is 0.6m width, therefore
these plates of high shear stress intensity zone will lies inside the corbel. Hence, can be ignored.

Ignoring the plate 14471

SQy for Load Case - 18 (70R wheeled Vehicle)

Load Case = 18
Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.232 N/mm2

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Load Factor = 1
Factored Nominal Shear Stress,tv = 0.232 N/mm2

Width, b = 1000.0 mm

Effective Depth, d = 647.0 mm

Grade of Steel for Shear reinforcement, f y = 415 N/mm2
Max permissible shear-tvmax = 3.1 N/mm2

(for M25 grade concrete) o.k

% of tension steel provided = 0.155 %

(Ref: Table-19 of IS 456:2000 )

Shear strength of M25 concrete for tension steel provided , tc

= 0.295 N/mm2
( Refer Table - 19, IS 456-2000)

> 0.232 N/mm2

Hence, Safe in Shear

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 DESIGN OF CORBEL (600 X 750)

Critical Load Case - 1.35 x DL + 1.35 x CB + 1.75 WC + 1.2 x LL + 1.5 VL (70R wheeled vehicle)

Axial Tension (L/C- 9)

L/C - 25
Mx 13 kNm
Mxy 7.2 kNm
Mx+Mxy 20.2 kNm

L/C - 25
My 23.1 kNm
Mxy 20 kNm
My+Mxy 43.1 kNm

Maximum B.M = 43.1

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 Check for Axial Tension
Load Case 25.00
2
Moment (Knm) 43.10 Tensile Stress = 0.782 N/mm
fck (Mpa) 25.00 Tensile Force = 351900 N
fy (Mpa) 500.00 Permissible Stress in reinforcement (0.55 x fy)
2
Des. Mu (Knm) 43.10 = 275 N/mm
2
Mulim (Knm) 1019.89 Required Steel Area = 1279.636 mm
ptlim 0.9435
D (mm) 750.00 Dia of Bar provided = 20 mm
d (mm) 715.00 Nos of Bar = 10 Nos
2
b (mm) 600.00 Provided Steel Area = 3141.593 mm
d' (mm) for At 35.00
d' (mm) for Asc 35.00 Hence O.K
Es 200000.00
pt1 0.0325 Check for Bending Moment
At1 (mm2) 139.48
xumax/d 326.04 Bar diameter = 16 mm
ecc at Asc Level 0.003124 Nos of Bars Required = 0.694 Nos
ssc (Mpa) 423.944 Provide 10 nos of 20 dia bars at top in 2 layer and 5
Asc (mm2) 0.000 nos 20 dia bar at bottom
pc 0.0000
At2 (mm2) 0.0000
pt2 0.0000
139.48
Total pt 0.0325
pmin IS13920 0.2400
pmin IS456 0.1700

No significant shear stress observed in Corbel, however nominal shear links are provided in Corbel area.

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 28

 DRAWINGS

7061396 | Design Report on Approach Bridge |Rev. 0 | August 2021 Page | 9

 Owner:
EPC Contractor PMC Consultant to JKSPDC Consultant Drawn Aug-21 Designed Aug-21 JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Corporate Office: Hotel Shaw Inn, Boulevard, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir (INDIA)
S.SHARMA N.K.SINGH
Project PARNAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3x12.5MW), JAMMU & KASHMIR
Drafting Aug-21 Design Aug-21
st Check Check Title BARRAGE BLOCK S14
1 Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, B.TEWATIA S.S.ROY
Plot Number -18, Sector - 18, APPROACH ROAD CONCRETE OUTLINE
PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED ICCS-RODIC CONSORTIUM Gurgaon - 122015, HARYANA Reviewed Aug-21 Submitted Aug-21
PLAN AT EL.1552.50
A ISSUED FOR APPROVAL N.A. 28-08-2021 e-mail: [email protected] Original Size Drawing Status Drawing No. Rev
website: www.smec.com.au
No Revision SMEC Date A.SRIVASTAVA N.ARORA A1 APPROVAL 7061396-1440 A
 Owner:
EPC Contractor PMC Consultant to JKSPDC Consultant Drawn Aug-21 Designed Aug-21 JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Corporate Office: Hotel Shaw Inn, Boulevard, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir (INDIA)
S.SHARMA N.K.SINGH
Project PARNAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3x12.5MW), JAMMU & KASHMIR
Drafting Aug-21 Design Aug-21
st Check Check Title BARRAGE BLOCK S14
1 Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, B.TEWATIA S.S.ROY
Plot Number -18, Sector - 18, APPROACH ROAD CONCRETE OUTLINE
PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED ICCS-RODIC CONSORTIUM Gurgaon - 122015, HARYANA Reviewed Aug-21 Submitted Aug-21
PLAN AT EL.1550.80
A ISSUED FOR APPROVAL N.A. 28-08-2021 e-mail: [email protected] Original Size Drawing Status Drawing No. Rev
website: www.smec.com.au
No Revision SMEC Date A.SRIVASTAVA N.ARORA A1 APPROVAL 7061396-1441 A
 SECTION

SECTION

DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL

Owner:
EPC Contractor PMC Consultant to JKSPDC Consultant Drawn Aug-21 Designed Aug-21 JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Corporate Office: Hotel Shaw Inn, Boulevard, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir (INDIA)
S.SHARMA N.K.SINGH
Project PARNAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3x12.5MW), JAMMU & KASHMIR
Drafting Aug-21 Design Aug-21
st Check Check Title BARRAGE BLOCK S14
1 Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, B.TEWATIA S.S.ROY
Plot Number -18, Sector - 18, APPROACH ROAD CONCRETE OUTLINE
PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED ICCS-RODIC CONSORTIUM Gurgaon - 122015, HARYANA Reviewed Aug-21 Submitted Aug-21
SECTIONS DETAILS
A ISSUED FOR APPROVAL N.A. 28-08-2021 e-mail: [email protected] Original Size Drawing Status Drawing No. Rev
website: www.smec.com.au
No Revision SMEC Date A.SRIVASTAVA N.ARORA A1 APPROVAL 7061396-1442 A
 SECTION

SECTION

Owner:
EPC Contractor PMC Consultant to JKSPDC Consultant Drawn Aug-21 Designed Aug-21 JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Corporate Office: Hotel Shaw Inn, Boulevard, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir (INDIA)
S.SHARMA N.K.SINGH
Project PARNAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3x12.5MW), JAMMU & KASHMIR
Drafting Aug-21 Design Aug-21
st Check Check Title BARRAGE BLOCK S14
1 Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, B.TEWATIA S.S.ROY
Plot Number -18, Sector - 18, APPROACH ROAD CONCRETE OUTLINE
PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED ICCS-RODIC CONSORTIUM Gurgaon - 122015, HARYANA Reviewed Aug-21 Submitted Aug-21
SECTIONS
A ISSUED FOR APPROVAL N.A. 28-08-2021 e-mail: [email protected] Original Size Drawing Status Drawing No. Rev
website: www.smec.com.au
No Revision SMEC Date A.SRIVASTAVA N.ARORA A1 APPROVAL 7061396-1443 A
 SECTION

SECTION

Owner:
EPC Contractor PMC Consultant to JKSPDC Consultant Drawn Aug-21 Designed Aug-21 JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Corporate Office: Hotel Shaw Inn, Boulevard, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir (INDIA)
S.SHARMA N.K.SINGH
Project PARNAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3x12.5MW), JAMMU & KASHMIR
Drafting Aug-21 Design Aug-21
st Check Check Title BARRAGE BLOCK S14
1 Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, B.TEWATIA S.S.ROY
Plot Number -18, Sector - 18, APPROACH ROAD CONCRETE OUTLINE
PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED ICCS-RODIC CONSORTIUM Gurgaon - 122015, HARYANA Reviewed Aug-21 Submitted Aug-21
SECTIONS
A ISSUED FOR APPROVAL N.A. 28-08-2021 e-mail: [email protected] Original Size Drawing Status Drawing No. Rev
website: www.smec.com.au
No Revision SMEC Date A.SRIVASTAVA N.ARORA A1 APPROVAL 7061396-1444 A
 DETAIL

SECTION DETAIL

SECTION

SECTION SECTION

Owner:
EPC Contractor PMC Consultant to JKSPDC Consultant Drawn Aug-21 Designed Aug-21 JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Corporate Office: Hotel Shaw Inn, Boulevard, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir (INDIA)
S.SHARMA N.K.SINGH
Project PARNAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3x12.5MW), JAMMU & KASHMIR
Drafting Aug-21 Design Aug-21

st Check Check Title BARRAGE BRIDGE

1 Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, B.TEWATIA S.S.ROY
Plot Number -18, Sector - 18,
APPROACH ROAD REINFORCEMENT
PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED ICCS-RODIC CONSORTIUM Gurgaon - 122015, HARYANA Reviewed Aug-21 Submitted Aug-21
SECTIONS DETAILS
A ISSUED FOR APPROVAL N.A. 28-08-2021 e-mail: [email protected] Original Size Drawing Status Drawing No. Rev
website: www.smec.com.au
No Revision SMEC Date
A.SRIVASTAVA N.ARORA
A1 APPROVAL 7061396-1445 A
 DETAIL

SECTION

DETAIL

Owner:
EPC Contractor PMC Consultant to JKSPDC Consultant Drawn Aug-21 Designed Aug-21 JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Corporate Office: Hotel Shaw Inn, Boulevard, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir (INDIA)
S.SHARMA N.K.SINGH
Project PARNAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT (3x12.5MW), JAMMU & KASHMIR
Drafting Aug-21 Design Aug-21

st Check Check Title BARRAGE BRIDGE

1 Floor, Novus Tower, West Wing, B.TEWATIA S.S.ROY
Plot Number -18, Sector - 18,
APPROACH ROAD REINFORCEMENT
PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED ICCS-RODIC CONSORTIUM Gurgaon - 122015, HARYANA Reviewed Aug-21 Submitted Aug-21
SECTIONS DETAILS
A ISSUED FOR APPROVAL N.A. 28-08-2021 e-mail: [email protected] Original Size Drawing Status Drawing No. Rev
website: www.smec.com.au
No Revision SMEC Date
A.SRIVASTAVA N.ARORA
A1 APPROVAL 7061396-1445 A