Vicious Circle of Ethiopian Politics Prospects and Challenges of Current Political Reform
Vicious Circle of Ethiopian Politics Prospects and Challenges of Current Political Reform
To cite this article: Abdisa Olkeba Jima | (2021) Vicious circle of Ethiopian politics: Prospects
and challenges of current political reform, Cogent Social Sciences, 7:1, 1893908, DOI:
10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
© 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons
Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Page 1 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
need to be released and come to the table discussion and debate to realize the
reform and ensure democratization.
1. Introduction
In Ethiopia, different political reforms have taken place many times. In the historical continuum of
the making and remaking of modern Ethiopia, the second half of the nineteenth century was
shaped by the wars of incorporation and state formation on unequal terms (Gudina, 2007).
Emperor Tewodros began modernization in politics by unifying the fragmented polities in
Ethiopia (Atnafu, 2017, p. 45). Confronted by local and regional kings, his support collapsed as
he became more authoritarian. Then, Kassa Mircha crowned himself as Emperor Yohannes IV in
1872. Yohannes IV decentralized power to monarchs and subordinates who recognized his claims
to overall the regional chiefs. But he was killed by the Mahdist of Sudan at the Metemma battle in
1889. Following his death in 1889, Menelik II came into power. He pursued a policy of expansion to
win new territories in the south, southeast, and southwest. The organized Abyssinian army,
equipped with modern firearms, met resistance from local and regional Oromo chiefs, Kaffa,
Sidama, and Wolaita. The military of the Abyssinian State defeated and surrendered those peoples.
A conquest was similar to that of the European colonizers elsewhere on the African continent
(Tronvoll, 2000, p. 14).
After 14 years of dual administration, Haile Selassie-I became Emperor in 1930 (Minority at Risk,
2004). The feudal system continued during his reign. The local peasantry in the south, southeast,
and southwest was subjected to serfdom and tied to its land by an elaborate mechanism of taxes
and services. Local elites were either suppressed or co-opted into the existing feudal Amharan
hierarchy (Veen, 2016). Between 1935 and 1941, Italian Fascist Mussolini conquered Ethiopia, but
Haile Selassie was exiled (Minority at Risk, 2004). Ethiopia was joined in a federation with Eritrea by
the United Nations in 1952. However, Haile Selassie repealed the confederations and attempted to
unify Ethiopia and Eritrea under his control within the next 10 years (Minority at Risk, 2004).
In 1974, Derg military regime deposed Emperor Haile Selassie (Minority at Risk, 2004). The Derg
officially adopted Marxist socialism as its ideology in 1975 and created the Popular Democratic
Republic of Ethiopia with a due constitution in 1984 (Abbink, 2009, p. 8). But the Ethiopian People
Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) overthrew the Derg regime and captured Addis Ababa in
1991 (Minority at Risk, 2004). EPRDF is composed of Tigray Peoples Liberation Front (TPLF), Amhara
Democratic Party (ADP), Oromo People Democratic Organization (OPDO), and Southern Ethiopian
Peoples Democratic Movement (SEPDM) (Temin & Badwaza, 2019). The transition began with
a military victory in Ethiopia, not a negotiated peace settlement (Lyons, 2019). The EPRDF was
committed to achieving state and power decentralization, political democratization, and economic
liberalization (Vaughan & Tronvoll, 2003, p. 28). In 1995, the EPRDF adopted a federal constitution
that divides Ethiopia into nine regional states (Temin & Badwaza, 2019, p. 140). Generally, the
twentieth century featured class and national struggles intended to end the asymmetrical rela
tions that arose in the historical process of the multi-ethnic polity creation in Ethiopia (Gudina,
2007).
Despite political reforms in Ethiopia in 1991, the political process is rigid and close to space for
representative democracy (Abbink, 2009). The capacity of political opposition remains limited
though reforms were made to liberalize Ethiopia’s economy, decentralize its state, and democra
tize its politics to reverse a history of centralized autocracy (Vaughan & Tronvoll, 2003, p. 1). The
first historical factor that influences the evolution of Ethiopia’s political settlement is the centra
lization, control, and coercion (Veen, 2016, p. 13). As a result, Ethiopia’s domestic politics have
Page 2 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
produced violence and continuing tension over the years. The political tensions and deeps inex
perience of democratization and state-building processes remain unresolved in the Ethiopian
political reforms (Smith, 2007). Following the 2005 national election, the Ethiopian government
began to control opposition political parties by declaring a state of emergency for 10 months (Lie &
Mesfin, 2018). Generally, both Derg and EPRDF leaders devote their time and energy to elevate
deceptive democracy through manipulation at best and the use of state terror at worst (Merera,
1994).
Barely months after Ethiopia’s 2015 elections, which saw the ruling EPRDF party sweep the
board in all federal and regional political institutions, anti-government protests erupted in the
Oromia Region opposing the Addis Ababa Master Plan (Temin & Badwaza, 2019; Van Der, 2018).
Also, protesters opposed the pliant and corrupt OPDO, which they accused of selling off Oromo’s
resources in general and land in specific. But OPDO bluntly denied any such allegations at the time
(International Crisis Group, 2020). Gradually, protests also exposed the internal EPRDF divisions
into two of its constituent parties—ANDM and OPDO—publicly siding with the protestors’
demands. Albeit people who publicly asked questions about land sales were detained and
tortured, the chair of EPRDF and Prime Minister (PM) of Ethiopia, Haile Mariam Dessalegn, resigned
in February 2018. Following this, EPRDF elected Abiy Ahmed as a PM on 2 April 2018 (Van Der,
2018).
Abiy took his overarching vision of national reconciliation and forgiveness to the public. He
acknowledged the government’s acts of torture and other human rights abuses publicly. He also
conducted town hall meetings, discussed with community leaders and local politicians. Further, he
released thousands of political prisoners and lifted the draconian state of emergency.
Furthermore, he announced plans to amend the constitution to institute term limits on the tenure
of the PM, invited exiled opposition politicians to return home and participate in politics, and
moved to lift the terrorist designation of opposition political parties (Badwaza, 2018; Temin &
Badwaza, 2019). Similarly, Abiy has made peace with Ethiopia’s old enemy, Eritrea, overhauled the
cabinet and other top posts, and committed to economic liberalization and democratic elections
(Temin & Badwaza, 2019).
However, amid the exciting changes, insecurity proliferates, the number of internally displaced
people mounts, and the economy struggles (International Crisis Group, 2020). Though the border
between Ethiopia and Eritrea reopened and families long split by the international conflict could
reunite in September 2018, it has been closed again (Temin & Badwaza, 2019, p. 140). Protests
have erupted in Oromia Region following the assassination of Oromo singer Hachalu Hundessa on
29 June 2020, which led to the detention of thousands of people (The African Report, 2020).
Although Abiy has come to power through EPRDF internal reform, he began to intimidate the TPLF
leaders. He tried to eliminate strong political oppositions such as Oromo Liberation Front (OLF) and
Oromo Federalist Congress (OFC) like the previous government. The current political reform in
Ethiopia circled viciously as similar to “coup d’état against emperor Haile Selassie in 1974, and the
defeat of Derg regime in 1991” (Tronvoll, 2009). This research explored the success and failure of
the vicious circle of Ethiopian politics since 2018.
2. Theoretical framework
Political scientists used different theories to study political reforms. Strategic choice theory, pro
spect theory, political party theory, and input–output theory are accustomed among political
scientists. The strategic choice theory provides a systematic framework for analyzing the give-
and-take of practical politics. Compared with other research traditions, it places distinctive empha
sis on opportunities for choice and change. The strategic choice analysis is not, however, a radical
departure. It converges with other traditions occasionally (Collier & Norden, 1991). The continued
success of strategic choice lies in the indigenous development in confronting concerns specific to
international politics (Stein, 1999).
Page 3 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
Prospect theory is the most influential behavioral theory of choice in the social sciences (Mercer,
2005). Political science can indeed gain from applying prospect theory (Vis, 2011). It suggests that
the individual attitude towards risk depends on whether they face losses or gains. It extends to
collective decision-making and allows for the application of political decision-making. The hypoth
esis derived from prospect theory is that by influencing the risk of attitude, and thereby the
willingness to pursue risky reform, gains and losses drive the government behavior in welfare
state reform. If the challenges are not resolved in the current political reforms, the widely heralded
success could rapidly turn into a monumental fiasco and jeopardize the stability of an entire region
(Vis, 2009). Prospect theory is an alternative theory of choice under conditions of risk that deviates
from expected utility theory by positing that people evaluate the choice concerning gains and
losses from a reference point (Levy, 2003). Its first characteristic is reference dependence, mean
ing that people make decisions not based on the outcome but relative to a reference point, usually
the status quo (Vis & Kuijpers, 2018). Generally, prospect theory emerged as a theory of individual
decision-making (Vis, 2011).
Theory of political parties in which interest groups and activists are the key actors and coalitions of
groups develop common agendas and screen candidates for party nominations based on loyalty to
their policy. This theoretical stance contrasts with currently dominant theories, which view parties as
controlled by election-minded politicians. The difference is normatively useful because parties domi
nated by interest groups and activists are less responsive to voter preferences, even to the point of
taking advantage of lapses in voter attention to politics (Bawn et al., 2012). In this theory, group
interests have a crucial impact on party behavior in politics (McCarty & Schickler, 2018).
On the other hand, the input–output model emphasizes the system behavior regarding incoming
demands and supports and the effects of these inputs as political outputs. It copies up dynamically
with a challenging environment (Crozier, 2011). It also indicates the quantity and scope of the
political community, regime, and government support and demand, which is supported by the wise
decision of the authoritative (Easton, 1957). The input–output model has become indispensable for
rational policy formulation when inputs, outputs, enter community’s objective function directly and
the economy in question is open (Baumol & Wolff, 1994).
For this research, the researcher used the input–output model because it shows the continuous
interactions between the environment and political systems. It unifies politics theory and a general
theory capable of analyzing all the issues (Mokaddem, 2019). The input–output model encompasses
a dynamic political system, an extra societal and intra societal environment, response of the political
system to society, and feedback by linking obtained information and reality. The hegemonic aspira
tions of the EPRDF are confirmed and reinforced by the legacy of an inherited authoritarian political
culture (Gudina, 2011). The political reforms of Abiy did not bring the intended societal expectation.
The questions of Oromo youths, for instance, concerning Addis Ababa administration ownership and
unemployment problems are not addressed by the new PM. However, the PM has come up with his
ideology, Medemer, which means coming together. This trend caused the vicious circle of Ethiopian
politics that the previous regime did for many years but failed in the end.
Page 4 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
interview and focus group discussion. Secondary data include books, articles, magazines, reports,
and archives that are applied to triangulate with primary data. David Easton’s input–output
analysis model was used to explain the demand people need from the government and how
they support the government, and how the decision of government influences the mob of com
munity. Finally, the collected data were analyzed by the content and thematic data analysis.
All opponent political parties also appreciated the political reform of Abiy and supported the
change initially. However, the representative of OFC argued the trend does not solve the funda
mental problems of the country. The PM could not answer the core questions of the youths.
By the same token, administrative border conflicts have become common in the country
recently. There are border conflicts between regional states of the country. All zones of Southern
Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region face the same challenges. These situations have caused
the displacement of many peoples in the country. For instance, more than two million Oromos
were evicted from Somalia Regional State due to administrative border conflict between Oromia
and Somalia regions in 2018. The PP representative suggested that the PM has established the
ministry of Peace to resettle all displaced people in the country.
Additionally, there are religious tensions and conflicts in Ethiopia. Specifically, religious tensions
and conflicts rose between Christians and Muslims. The conflict’s history went back to the medieval
Page 5 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
period in Ethiopia. The two religions conflicted on the expansion directions. Christian Religion
expanded to the southern, whereas Islam Religion expanded to the northern. Foreigners spon
sored both religions on their expansion. When the Portuguese supported Christians, the Ottoman
Turkey supported Muslims. During medieval times, many mosques and churches were destroyed
on both sides. Orthodox Christianity has been used as a state religion for many years in the
country. Nevertheless, the Derg regime abolished it in 1974. Still, there is a sense of such super
iority among Christians that frustrates the Muslims. Interview results with all opponent political
parties revealed that the government also uses religion as machinery though the Constitution
declares secularism—no state religion. To solve the difference between the two religions and
lasting peace, the ministry of Peace has gotten due attention from Abiy under his new ministerial
restructure. Focus group discussants explained the Reconciliation Commission was established to
realize the peace in Ethiopia, but they are dysfunctional.
Generally, the ministry of Peace oversees the National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS),
Information Network Security Agency (INSA), Federal Police Commission, Finance Security and
Information Center, National Disaster Risk Management Commission, the Administration for
Refugee and Returnee Affairs, Ethiopian Foreign Relations Strategic Studies Institute, and the
Main Department for Immigration and Nationality Affairs. Ministry of Peace will also assume the
roles and responsibilities of former Federal and Pastoralist Development Affairs (“Proclamation No.
1097/2018,” 2018).
Following an attempt to implement Addis Ababa’s new master plan in 2014, the Oromo
people began to protest the ruling government, EPRDF. As the protest has become intensi
fied, the government declared a draconian state of emergency and detained many people.
Leaders and members of opponent political parties were jailed. Merera Gudina, the OFC
leader, was jailed alleging violating the state of the emergency rule as being seen and
contacted by the groups of terrorists. The groups of political parties the government
declared as terrorists are OLF, ONLF, Arbagnoch Ginbot-7. Andergachew Tsige, the secretary
of the Ginbot-7 was caught in Yemen and put into jail. Many protesters, journalists, bloggers,
artists, singers, activists, and civil fighters were detained.
As Abiy replaced Haile Mariam Dessalegn, he released many political prisoners that include
journalists. The government announced that Maeklawi, the big prison site found in Addis Ababa,
was closed and turned into a museum. But this did not last many years because Abiy’s government
jailed many opponent politicians in Maeklawi as EPRDF agreed upon (Badwaza, 2018; Temin &
Badwaza, 2019). Numerically, Abiy released 60,000 political leaders (Temin & Badwaza, 2019).
Page 6 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
The government allowed the return of opposition politicians from exile. The government allowed
the registration of their political parties in the country. The repeal of repressive laws such as the
Charities and Societies Proclamation and Anti-terrorism Proclamation that had been used by past
governments since 2009 to paralyze local media, civil society, and opposition political parties were
revisited (Amnesty International, 2020). Human Rights Watch (2020b) asserts the government
released thousands of political prisoners from detention, admitted that security forces relied on
torture, committed to legal reforms of repressive laws, and introduced numerous other reforms.
But, there has been a significant breakdown in law and order in parts of Ethiopia amidst escalating
ethnic tensions that have resulted in several numbers of internally displaced persons.
Although Eritrea had begun the war, it was concluded by the victory of Ethiopia. Indeed, the
relationship between Ethiopia and Eritrea was seen as a period of “No Peace No War” for the
last two decades because the late PM of Ethiopia, Meles Zenawi, refused to accept the
Algiers Agreement later on. The Ethio-Eritrea Boundary Commission sponsored by the UN
favored Badime for Eritrea on the Algiers Agreement in 2000. During the Ethio-Eritrean war,
many people had displaced and forced to return to their home state in both countries. The
governments of both sides confiscated the resources of those people.
Following elected as PM, Abiy delivered a reconciliation speech on the first speech he made for the
parliament. He accelerated nascent EPRDF efforts to make peace with Eritrea by accepting the
Algiers Agreement of 2000. Eritrea’s reclusive and long-ruling authoritarian president, Isaias
Afwerki, traveled to Ethiopia in July 2018 after 20 years (Temin & Badwaza, 2019). People of the
two countries crossed the border and met their former families and relatives who had left during
the Ethio-Eritrea war. The world applauds Abiy and Isaias for the restoration of peace between the
two countries. In September, the border reopened, and families long split by the international
conflict could reunite, but the border has been closed again (Temin & Badwaza, 2019). The
Embassies of Ethiopia and Eritrea were reopened publicly. Besides, air flights between Addis
Ababa and Asmara began to work publicly. The former ports of Ethiopia, Asseb and Mitsawa, are
forecasted to give services to Ethiopia.
The economic reforms attracted international financial institutions such as the IMF and World
Bank initially. Interview results with opponent political parties indicated that the appreciation
Page 7 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
Ethiopia received from World Bank and IMF did not last due to Abiy’s authoritarian. The war
between the central government and Tigray region, violation of human and democratic rights,
detention of many civilians and opponent political parties leaders and members, use of the military
against civilians, the assassination of many civilians, and narrow political space which are wit
nessed under Abiy administration are key challenges to homegrown economic policy.
Consequently, the IMF canceled the 500 USD million it decided to give to the Ethiopian govern
ment. Although the Ethiopian government amended privatization policies, regulations, and pro
clamations, no company has been privatized yet.
After Abiy had come into power, Oromo believed that Addis Ababa demarcated from Oromia
Regional State administration. And the master plan was presumed to be canceled. The PM
established the ad-hoc committee in 2019 to investigate the case and report to him. The
established pseudo committee was to appease people who protested the transfer of the
condominium houses that Addis Ababa City built in the Oromia Region to the owners.
Indeed, Abiy neither created an administrative border between the two nor stopped the
illegal expansion of Addis Ababa City into the Oromia Region, practically. This area has
remained unresolved issues yet.
In the same vein, the Oromo struggled to make Afaan Oromoo an additional federal working
language next to Amharic. Even though Abiy promised to implement it when he came into
power, he could not make Afaan Oromoo the Federal working language. Instead, he proposed
a language policy that might implement within 15 coming years to appease people.
Accordingly, the PM proposed Afaan Oromoo, Somali, Afar, and Tigrigna languages as working
languages of the PP. That means those languages are languages of the party, not the addi
tional working languages of the country. Hence, the Oromo people continued to oppose Abiy as
they lost confidence in him.
Page 8 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
Ahmed because the economy has declined and could not create job opportunities for youths.
The PM focused on extending his power by deepening and inculcating the PP and Medemer
ideology but failed.
The special interest of the State of Oromia in Addis Ababa, regarding the provision of social
services or the utilization of natural resources and other similar matters, as well as a joint
administrative matter arising from the location of Addis Ababa within the State of Oromia,
shall be respected.
Here, the joint administration means Addis Ababa shall be the dual administration of the Federal
government and Oromia Regional State. The Oromia Regional State Constitution No.1/1995 article
6 specifies that Finfinnee shall be the capital city of Oromia Regional States. Where is Finfinnee?
Finfinnee is the original name of Addis Ababa and we can use it interchangeably. Both the FDRE
Constitution and 1995 Oromia Regional State Constitution explain that Addis Ababa is the dual
administration of the Federal and Oromia Regional State. Though the Finfinnee is the capital city of
the Oromia Region constitutionally, the Oromia Region government does not use it as equal as the
federal government. There is no specific agreement between the Federal government and Oromia
Regional State on dual administration yet.
As Abiy Ahmed came into power, there was a cold war between Oromo and Amhara elites on
the administration ownership of Addis Ababa. Interview results with NAMA and EZEMA represen
tatives indicated that Addis Ababa’s administration ownership should be only for the Federal
government. They argued Oromo has no special interest in Addis Ababa, which in contrast to
FDRE Constitution article 49(5). They also defended that Addis Ababa belongs to the Amhara
people historically. This argument is a blind and weak argument that has no legal and historical
grounds. However, the OFC, OLF, PP, and TPLF representatives argued against that Addis Ababa is
the capital city of both the Federal government and the Oromia Regional State. Also, it is the
headquarters of the African Union (AU). The special interest that Oromos have from Addis Ababa
has to be respected and practiced as it has been already stated in the Constitution. Oromo claimed
that there must be specific and clear laws related to the dual administration of Addis Ababa, the
use of resources, and the exercise of languages.
Since Afaan Oromoo is the working language of Oromia Regional State and Addis Ababa is the
capital city of Oromia too, it has to be used equally with Amharic (the Federal working language)
and enjoy equal status. Indeed, the immediate cause for the reform and come of Abiy into power
was the Addis Ababa master plan in which Oromo youths protested the expansion of Addis Ababa
into Oromo land illegally. Interview results with OFC, OLF, and PP representatives showed that
before Addis Ababa was established, the Oromo clans such as Gulallee, Eekka, Galan, Gumbichu,
and Abbichuu lived there. But the expansion of Addis Ababa cleansed those clans by expanding
into their lands, which was responsible for the immigration of those clans into different areas.
Consequently, Oromo claimed the abovementioned rights and equity administrative structures of
Oromia Regional State in Addis Ababa equally with the Federal government.
Generally, different ethnic groups live in Addis Ababa. Nevertheless, only Amhara elites oppose
the question of Oromo people on administration ownership of Addis Ababa purposively. Similar to
the previous regime, the Abiy government also did not answer those questions, especially on
administrative border demarcation between Addis Ababa and the Oromia Regional State that
remains an elusive argument and the quest of the Oromo people yet.
Page 9 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
The PM presumed himself as the cause of all things, and no one is above him. He never
listens to others. By this process, it is difficult to rule a country. He undermined the previous
achievements and assumed himself as a father of all things. The secret behind Medemer is
to demise the federal system and restore the unitary state, which violates the right to self-
administration of nations, nationalities, and peoples of Ethiopia. Thus, the TPLF and other
federalists did not accept the ideas. Attempting to impose Medemer ideology on the people
is impossible. The end of such a unilateral Medemer view will be destructive.
Indeed, the PM is much ambitious leader. Rather than answering the questions of people who were
the root cause of the protest. The PM tried to impose his ideology without considering the diverse
opinions of Ethiopian peoples. The interview results with OFC, OLF, and TPLF representatives
exhibited Medemer ideology was imposed on the Ethiopian people without considering the existing
practical situations and conducting hot discussion and debate among government officials and
members. Hence, TPLF, the founder of EPRDF, did not support the ideas of Medemer. The TPLF also
opposed the demise of the EPRDF and the formation of the PP from the beginning. Later on,
individuals who did not accept the Medemer views and support PP were fired from their positions.
Lemma Megersa, who presumed the right hands of Abiy and the father of reform, was sacked from
the central committee of the party and Ministry of National Defense. Similarly, Milkessa Midega and
Teyiba Hassein were sacked from the Oromia division central committee of PP. From the beginning
of the PP establishment, those people were not members of the party.
The Medemer is a utopia. Imposing utopia on Ethiopian people is impossible because the
people, especially, the Oromo have gotten aware of it. Demising the EPRDF and replacing it
with a PP is to appease the people. But the people know to curtail behind the party from the
beginning. Thus the people opposed it. The name PP replaced EPRDF. But the people and
members are still the same. Now, the country is at crossroads. Unless different political
parties are involved and forward solutions, the fate of this country is in danger. Abiy, a fresh
politician, has taken this country in the wrong. No one builds the country and realizes the
transition alone.
On the other hand, the representative of the PP defended that Medemer is the real implementation
of federalism. He further explained that federalism has not been practiced for the last 27 years.
Also, regional states have never elected their presidents. Thus, Medemer and the PP are introduced
to realize federalism. But interview results with opponent political parties’ representatives indi
cated that there is no difference between EPRDF and PP practically. As EPRDF, the presidents of
regional states are assigned centrally by the PM except for the Tigray Region. “To control the Tigray
Region, the PM has opened the war on TPLF alleging to military hostilities, that cause the death
and migration of many civilians,” opponent political parties’ focus group discussants complained.
The presidents of regional states who refused to accept the Medemer ideology would be expelled
from power automatically. Abiy also preaches about the restoration of former Great Ethiopia.
Page 10 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
However, interview results with OLF and OFC representatives questioned that when did Ethiopia
Great? And which Ethiopia was?
Medemer reforms are central to building a variant democracy, boost economic development,
and enhance regional integration (Mokaddem, 2019). However, the findings of this research
showed the Medemer ideology was seen as a threat to democracy. It was imposed on the
Ethiopian people by the PM without identifying the interest of the community.
By law, Ethiopia’s parliament will reach the end of its constitutional five-year term on
5 October 2020. That could leave the country without a legitimate parliament or government.
According to the PM, his government will stay in charge until the election is held safely (The
Economist, 2020). The ruling party presented four possible scenarios to circumvent the constitu
tional crisis: dissolving the parliaments, declaring a state of emergency, amending the constitution,
and seeking a constitutional interpretation. Then, the Parliament endorsed this on 5 May 2020, and
they have asked the House of Federation to issue an interpretation within a month (Ibid) without
arriving at a political consensus with opponent political parties. Following this, the Speaker of the
House of Federation resigned by opposing the illegal act of the government. The speaker is also
a member of TPLF. Finally, interpretation is the option adopted by the government (Ethiopia
Observer, 2020) by neglecting the options of the opposition political parties.
The opponents argued that the government asked the Council of Constitutional Inquiry,
which is not an independent constitutional court, merely an advisory body to the upper
house of parliament, and controlled by the ruling party, for an opinion on the postponement
(The Economist, 2020). FDRE Constitution article 84(1) declares that the Council of
Constitutional Inquiry shall have powers to investigate constitutional disputes. Based on the
Constitution, opponents opposed the governmental option, and they came up with one coun
terargument. They argued interpretation is applicable only where there is conflict or contra
diction between clauses of the Constitution or lack of clarity in the answer it gives to a specific
question. At any rate, it is not used to extend the determined time that the Constitution allots
to an elected government (Ethiopia Observer, 2020). As a result, most opposition parties with
significant constituencies have rejected the decision (Berhe, 2020; Ethiopia Observer, 2020). The
ruling party was partial to constitutional interpretation since all the House of People
Representatives and the House of Federation are members of the ruling party. Interview results
with opponent political parties’ representatives disclosed that the members of both houses
worked to extend their tenures by themselves that caused a constitutional crisis. Mbondenyi
and Ojienda (2013) present consistent culture of compliance will be critical to the future of
constitutional government in Nigeria. Similarly, the finding of this research indicated that
consistent culture of biased decision and favor to the ruling party is the most critical to the
democratization process in Ethiopia.
4.2.5 The tension then war between central government and Tigray region
The TPLF ruled Ethiopia under the umbrella of the EPRDF coalition for the last 27 years. ODPO,
ANDM, and SEPDP were the pseudo parties and messengers of TPLF. Abiy also admitted that his
party (OPDO) was a messenger and servant of TPLF. “The PM declared war with the help of Eritrea
troops on the TPLF alleging to warring North military camp,” Interview results with OFC and OLF
representatives. They also remarked curtail behind the war was to demise TPLF and control the
Page 11 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
Tigray Region. But the interview result of PP, NAMA, and EZEMA disclosed that the Federal
government declared the war for military operation purposes to prevail rule of laws. To get curtail
behind the war, the researcher argued that the independent international institutions need to
interfere and investigate it.
Four coalition parties of EPRDF discussed, debated, and arrived at a consensus after 14 days
of hot discussion. Four people were set for election—Abiy Ahmed from ODP, Demeke
Mekonin from ADP, Sheferew Shugute from SEPDM, and Debretsion Gebremickael from TPLF.
During the vote, Demeke resigned, and finally, Abiy Ahmed was elected as PM by party, not
by the people.
Nonetheless, Abiy began to take measures against members of TPLF—expelling, jailing, sanction
ing, and suing representatives of TPLF immediately. “The former METEC general director General
Kinfe Dagnechew was jailed alleging corruption. The other 60 members of TPLF and officials were
jailed within a day because of the same reasons,” TPLF focus group discussants complained. They
also claimed the former INSA director Getachew Assefa wanted for jail. Yet, Abiy kept silent when
Amhara youths closed the main road that connects Addis Ababa and Mekele for 2 years. The PM
continues to sanction TPLF to separate from the Tigray people. The PP interviewee encountered the
TPLF representatives by stating that “The TPLF officials who escaped from Abiy’s jail returned to
Mekele, the capital city of Tigray, and reorganized the people against Abiy’s administration”.
Initially, the Tigray people supported Abiy as he made a speech in the Tigrigna language at
Mekele. Gradually, the relationship between Abiy’s administration and TPLF turned to the cold
war, later the real warring. PM produced different fake documentaries against the TPLF by using
public media—EBC, FBC, and Walta media. TPLF also did the same thing.
Scapegoating COVID-19, Abiy decided to postpone the 2020 national elections, which caused
a constitutional crisis in the country. The TPLF claimed that the pseudo, biased and unconcerned
constitutional inquiry committee led by federal Supreme Court President, Meaza Ashenafi, was
established to interpret the constitution, not for Ethiopians. Indeed, politicians like Jawar
Mohammed, Lidatu Ayalew, Bekele Gerba, Merera Gudina, and most opposition political parties
opposed the constitutional interpretation to elongate the PM power. But the PM declared a state of
emergency by controlling the pandemic and began to jail different political oppositions. These
trends, which viciously circled the Ethiopian political reforms, have been practiced in Ethiopian
politics for many years. The established committee extended the election for an undefined date.
Finally, the tenure of the House of People and House of Federation was elongated as well.
Contrarily, TPLF vowed to defend the Constitution under the umbrella of the Federalist Group.
Indeed, the Constitution does not give any room for postponing the election under any circum
stance. Following this, TPLF conducted an election at the regional level. To fulfill the legal proce
dure, the Tigray Region requested the National Election Board of Ethiopia (NEBE); yet, NEBE
rejected conducting the election is prohibited until the COVID-19 is re-evaluated and
a guarantee for election is assured. TPLF representative focus group discussants explained,
The federal government, ordered by Abiy, warned the Tigray Region not to conduct elections
many times. In return, the TPLF defended that Abiy has become a dictator and had no power
to interfere in the Regional State. The PM sent a group of religious and elderly leaders to
arbitrate the case; nevertheless, the TPLF refused and complained that the problem was
a national problem and needed national reconciliation.
The FDRE Constitution article 39(1) declares nations, nationalities, and peoples of Ethiopia have the
right to self-determination up to secession. Contrarily, the central government banned all media of
the Tigray Region. Tigray TV, Dimtsi Woyane TV, and FM radios of Tigray were banned without legal
procedure. The members of TPLF who work in Addis Ababa were jailed. But within a few days, the
Page 12 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
Tigray Region re-opened the media. TPLF has amended the regional electoral law—reframed from
the first past the post to proportional representation to allow and include opponent political
parties. They also established a regional electoral commission. Finally, TPLF won the election; but
the Baytona party entered the state council with one seat. However, TPLF decided to give 15% of
seats to parties that did not win the election peacefully.
Generally, the relationship between the central government and Tigray Regional State is para
doxical. Abiy tried to weaken the Tigray Region and TPLF in different ways. He mobilized conflicts
between Tigray Region and neighbor states such as Amhara Region and Afar Region, closed the
roads between Eritrea and Tigray, banned the regional media, sanctioned economically, and
warned and kidnapped foreigners not to go to Tigray, especially the journalists. But the Tigray
Regional State smashed the record of PP by conducting a regional election on 9 September 2020
that remained a cold war between the central government and Tigray Region. Finally, the war has
opened between the central government and TPLF caused the death, eviction, and migration of
many people in the Tigray Region.
Following the assassination of Amhara Regional State leaders at Bahir Dar and national
army leaders at Addis Ababa, authorities detained persons arbitrarily. The detainees include
around 300 activists, journalists, and opposition party members. There were hundreds of
reports of arbitrary arrest by security forces. Police called detainees for nightly interrogations
where they were forced to stand for long periods. Prison and pretrial detention center
conditions remained harsh and life-threatening. There is also unlawful interference with
Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence.
The OLF interviewee claimed that many members of the party were detained many times without
any charges. Abdi Regassaa and Colonel Gemechu Ayana, prominent of OLF, were put into custody
for several months without any accusation. The government works hard to disregard OLF from the
heart of the Oromo people via different propaganda. Hitherto it could not succeed. Many offices of
OLF were attacked and closed. Also, the government made a political conspiracy against OLF
because of having many supporters.
The PM jailed many members of the OFC party following the joining of Jawar Mohammed to the
party. Jawar, Merera (chairman of OFC), Bekele, and other members moved into different areas
such as North Shewa, Arsi, and Bale zones and campaigned. Surprisingly, millions of communities
welcomed and discussed with them about future directions. That act annoyed Abiy Ahmed
because he never thought that people prefer other political parties to his party. The government
officials banned the leaders of OFC when they planned to move to the Jimma Zone. The Jimma is
the birthplace of Abiy. Abiy mobilized the people to understand their feeling and got support. Still,
only some people and only his cabinets rallied to support him. Meanwhile incident had happened
to his supporters in Ambo. A bomb attack during the rally wounded about 30 people. The act
irritated him and turned to jail many supporters of OFC in different areas. The police detained
many people by the scapegoat of COVID-19. Interview results with OLF and OFC party representa
tives revealed that some of their members were killed by armies; then the bodies were eaten by
Page 13 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
a hyena in the Hararge zone. The situation has become worse following the assassination of known
Oromo artist Hachalu Hundessa.
Ethiopian authorities have been detaining dozens of opposition members and journalists for
prolonged periods and often without charge since late June 2020, raising serious rights
concerns. Specifically, following the killing of prominent artist Hachalu Hundessa, on
June 30, security forces in Addis Ababa arrested OFC leaders Jawar Mohammed and Bekele
Gerba; Balderas Party figures Eskinder Nega and Sintayehu Chekol, and TPLF officials
Tewelde Gebre Tsadikan and Berihu Tsigie and others for their alleged involvement in the
violence. Further, the authorities detained government critics across the political spectrum,
including Lammi Begna of the OLF, whose whereabouts remained unknown for several
weeks; and Lidetu Ayalew, a founding member of the Ethiopian Democratic Party. The police
also arrested journalists representing various media outlets, including a Kenyan journalist,
Yassin Juma, Guyo Wario, Mohammed Siraj, and Melesse Direbssa from the Oromia Media
Network; and most recently, on August 6, Belay Manaye and Mulugeta Anberbir from the
Amharic language outlet Asrat Media. A month after one of the most violent spates of
unrest in the country’s recent history, police and prosecutors need to publicly account for all
detainees’ whereabouts, comply promptly and fully with court bail orders. And ensure easy
and regular access to lawyers and relatives for those not released. Preventing detainees
from communicating with families or promptly consulting with a lawyer may place the
detainees at greater risk of abuse in detention and undermines their right to a fair trial.
OLF and OFC focus group discussants claimed all prisons are full. The schools, warehouses, and
individuals’ houses have become the center of detention in Ethiopia. This situation dangers the
democratization process in the country. Generally, mass detention, torture, intimidation, eviction,
and killing of civilians continued as similar to the previous government that viciously circled the
Ethiopian political reforms.
Ethiopian security forces committed horrendous human rights violations including burning
homes to the ground, extrajudicial executions, torture, rape, forced evictions, arbitrary arrests,
and detentions, sometimes of entire families, in Oromia. The regional police units and local
administration militia complicated inter-communal violence between the Amhara and Qimant
ethnic communities in West and Central Gondar, the Amhara region (Amnesty International,
2020). Amnesty International also found that members of the Ethiopian Defense Forces, regional
police Special Forces, local administration officials, and allied militia armed youths. The vigilante
groups carried out serious human rights violations in Guji and West Guji zones in Oromia Regional
State and the West Gondar and Central Gondar zones of Amhara Regional State.
Over the past decade, Human Rights Watch has documented the Ethiopian governments
repeatedly use broad and ill-conceived laws, including a now-amended 2009 anti-terrorism pro
clamation and 2008 mass media law, to crackdown on free speech and peaceful dissent. The
authorities have arbitrarily arrested, detained, and prosecuted scores of journalists, political oppo
sition members, and activists under that law. The newly enacted hate speech and disinformation
law similarly risk being used as a tool of repression (Human Rights Watch, 2020a). On 5 August,
federal police similarly ignored a bail to release journalists Melesse (who is still in jail) and Yassin
Page 14 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
(released later). On 11 August, Federal Police transferred Yassin to Addis Ababa police custody,
where they accused him of the same allegations (Human Rights Watch, 2020b).
Generally, many youths are killed, jailed, and transported from one custody to another like
commodity when courts ordered the right to bail. Judges were beaten and imprisoned by police
and security forces. The soldiers and police raped many females. The houses of detainees were
searched without a court order and burnt. Elders, children, artists, members of political opponents,
and women were frustrated and beaten by security forces and police. This activity violates the
right to privacy, accused persons, persons in custody, opinion expression, association, peaceful
demonstration, and thought, which are explained in the FDRE Constitution.
The opponent political parties commonly argued that aside from Lemma and Gedu, who worked
to reunite Oromo and Amhara, most cadres of the two regions diverted the unity of Oromara to
tactical relations. The speech of Shemalis Abdisa, president of the Oromia Region, annoyed the
Amhara cadres because he said that the OPDO won TPLF either by convincing or confusing others.
Both regions used Oromara as means of a zero-sum game. The opponent political parties further
claimed that Amhara cadres work for instability of the Oromia region and vice versa secretly.
Indeed, this draconian is witnessed during Amhara regional leaders’ assassination and following
the death of artist Hachalu Hundessa in Oromia.
In a nutshell, uniting people toward common interest and development plays a significant role in
mutual understanding and boost development. But the Oromara relation is used for the political
puzzle. This conspiracy provoked a cold war between Oromo and Amhara ethnics many times.
Majority of opponent political parties’ focus group discussants addressed,
Abiy by himself also uses Oromara as a means to elongate his power. Yet, he does not work
for the people-to-people relations. To realize it, he removed both Lemma and Gedu from
regions. The reality is that he cannot order and manipulate both of them if they were the
presidents. To achieve his dream and control the two nations as he liked, he removed the
two tactically and assigned pseudo presidents in both regions.
Generally, there is a tactical relation between Amhara and Oromo elites (Dibu & Ahadu, 2020). The
findings of this research are consistent with Dibu and Ahadu because the zero-sum game between
Oromara elites causes the deaths and evictions of many people.
5. Conclusion
Ethiopia witnessed different political reforms since the formation of modern Ethiopia in the nine
teenth century. So far, many political reforms have taken place forcefully. Until Emperor Haile
Page 15 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
Sellassie was overthrown in 1974 by Derg, feudalism was practiced in Ethiopia for many years.
Further, Orthodox Christianity was used as a state religion. The Derg came into power in 1974 by
the slogan “Ethiopia Tikdem or Ethiopia First” and imposed socialism to reduce economic inequal
ity between the poor and rich. The Derg also answered the question of “Land for Tiller” by
distributing lands to peasants. The Derg attempted to ensure economic equality, but it could not
ensure political equality among different nations. Hence it was defeated by the EPRDF coalition
force in 1991. The EPRDF demised socialism and adopted capitalism, albeit not last more. The
EPRDF focused on nations’ equality. Federalism replaced the unitary. Nine regional states were
formed based on the willingness, language, and settlement patterns of the people. EPRDF ruled the
country for 27 years. But the Oromo youths began to protest the government in 2014. The
immediate cause of the protest was the new Addis Ababa Master Plan. Also, violation of funda
mental rights, detentions, tortures, deaths, economic inequalities, and corruption contributed to
protest. In 2018, the PM, Haile Mariam Dessalegn, resigned. Following this, EPRDF elected Abiy
Ahmed as leader of the party and PM.
The initial coming of Abiy was hopeful. He took different measures such as restructures of ministries
and women empowerment, rapprochement of Ethio-Eritrea, the release of political prisoners, return of
exiled opponents political parties, and economic reforms to wide political spaces. Gradually the reform
could not realize the intended goals and returned to the previous old system because of different
challenges. Those are constitutional crisis due to postponing of the election, detention of the mass
people and members and leaders of opposition political parties without charges and some charged
with terrorism like the previous government, violation of fundamental rights, the assassination of
many people, displacement of many people due to internal conflicts, the imposition of new ideology
(Medemer and prosperity party), tactical relations of Oromara, the war between Tigray region and the
central government, and quarrel on administration ownership of Addis Ababa. The EPRDF coalition
party transferred power to Abiy Ahmed peacefully. However, his tenure resulted in the war between
the central government and Tigray Region. The interwar is usual before and after the political change
in Ethiopia. It concluded that Ethiopian politics circled viciously into old paths, which practiced for
many years to scramble power. It is also viciously circumnavigated into the war as a cause of political
reforms or following political reforms. The current government is unable to ensure democratization
and boost development through mutual consensus among different political parties. Finally, the
researcher recommended that the government should release the detainees and host for table
discussion and national consensus.
Page 16 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
Page 17 of 18
Jima, Cogent Social Sciences (2021), 7: 1893908
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1893908
© 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Cogent Social Sciences (ISSN: 2331-1886) is published by Cogent OA, part of Taylor & Francis Group.
Publishing with Cogent OA ensures:
• Immediate, universal access to your article on publication
• High visibility and discoverability via the Cogent OA website as well as Taylor & Francis Online
• Download and citation statistics for your article
• Rapid online publication
• Input from, and dialog with, expert editors and editorial boards
• Retention of full copyright of your article
• Guaranteed legacy preservation of your article
• Discounts and waivers for authors in developing regions
Submit your manuscript to a Cogent OA journal at www.CogentOA.com
Page 18 of 18