Public Finance and Taxation Chapter 1 & 2
Public Finance and Taxation Chapter 1 & 2
CHAPTER ONE
1 Overview of Public Finance
Governments, all over the world have started number of public projects, such as social
security, protection and other services of public utilities like electricity, water supply,
railways, heavy electricity, atomic energy, etc. To provide social amenities in the form of
education, health and sanitation facilities and public utilities, the government requires
adequate revenue.
Public Finance, therefore, deals with the income and expenditure of public authorities.
It deals with the financial operations or finances of the government. Central, state and local
government raises revenues from various tax sources and non-tax sources, such as revenue
from general, administrative and economic services, borrowings from individuals,
corporations and friendly foreign countries. .
2. “Public finance deals with the provision custody and disbursement of resources needed for
conduct of public or government functions.” Lutz
3.“Public finance is a science which deals with the activity of the statement in obtaining
and applying the material means necessary for fulfilling the proper functions of the
state.” Carl Plehn
4. “Public finance is the study of the principles underlying the spending and raising of
funds of public authorities.” Findley Shirras
5. “The government, considered as a unit, may be defined as the subject of study of public
finance. More specifically, public finance studies the economic activity of government as a
unit.” Buchanan
6. “Public finance deals with expenditure and income of public authorities of the state and
their mutual relations as also with the financial administration and control.” Bastable
All of them say that it is a study of income and expenditure of the central, state, and local
governments. Government performs many functions which the individual cannot or
do not perform. Therefore, rising of funds for the expenditure and their disbursement
constitutes the subject of Public finance.
A) Similarities
a) Satisfaction of Human Wants
Both the public and private finance have the same objective, i.e., the satisfaction of human
wants. Public finance is concerned with the satisfaction of social or collective wants,
whereas private finance is concerned with the satisfaction of personal or individual wants.
b) Maximum Advantage
Both the public finance and private finance try to secure maximum advantage or
maximum benefit. An individual or a corporation or a private business firm tries to obtain
maximum advantage from his expenditure. Similarly, the government also tries to obtain maximum
good of the people by incurring expenditure on the society.
c) Borrowings
Another similarity between the public and private finance is that many times both have
to be obtained from the market in the form of borrowings whenever the expenditure
of either the government or any individual or firm exceeds their income/revenue.
d) Engagement in Similar Activities
Both the private and public sectors are engaged in activities that involve lots of
purchases, sales and other transactions. Similarly, they are engaged in production,
exchange, saving capital accumulation, investment, and so on. In order to finance these
operations, the government, creates money, raises loans and makes payments
etc. Similarly, a private economic unit lends, borrows, receives payments, and
makes payments and so on. In these respects, therefore, both the public and private
finance are quite similar to each other.
e) Scarcity of Resources
The scarcity of resources is also an important factor which is common to both. They have
unlimited objectives, whereas the resources are limited.
f) Problem of Adjustment of Income and Expenditure
Another similarity between public and private finance is that both the public as well as
private sectors face the problem of adjustment of income and expenditure.
2) Dissimilarities
a) Motive
The motive of private finance is personal interest or benefit, whereas the motive of public
finance is social benefit or public welfare.
b) Adjustment Approach of Income and Expenditure
Another dissimilarity between the individual‟s private finance and the government‟s
public finance is that every individual tries as far as possible to adjust his expenditure
to his income because his expenditure depends on his income. Conversely, the
government first prepares its budget. In other words, the government first determines its
expenditure and then devises ways and means to raise the requisite revenue to meet its
expenses.
c) Nature of Resources
The resources (private finance) of an individual are more or less limited, whereas the
resources of the government (public finance) are enormous. Government can raise
resources from tax sources as well as non-tax sources. The government can borrow from
1. Public revenue
2. Public Expenditure
3. Public debt
4. Financial administration
5. Economic stabilization
Under this category, the sources of the public revenue, principles of taxation, effects of taxes
on the economy, methods of raising revenue and the like are dealt with. Public revenue is the
means for public expenditure. Various sources of public revenue are:
a. Tax revenue:
Taxes are compulsory payments to government without expectation of direct return or benefit
to tax payers. It imposes a personal obligation on the taxpayer. Taxes received from the
taxpayers, may not be incurred for their benefit alone. Tax revenue is one of the most
important sources of revenue.
Taxation is the powerful instrument in the hands of the government for transferring
purchasing power from individuals to government.
1. Taxes on income and expenditure which include income tax, corporate tax etc.
2. Taxes on property and capital transactions and includes estate duty, tax on wealth, gift tax
etc.
3. Taxes on commodities and services, covers excise duties, customs duties, sales tax,
service tax etc.
These three types can be reclassified into direct and indirect taxes. The first two
types belong to the category of direct taxes and the third type comes under indirect
taxes.
b) Non-tax revenue:
This includes the revenue from government or public undertakings, revenue from
social services like education and hospitals, and revenue from loans or debt service etc.
precondition of growth.
5. Urbanization Effect: The spread of urbanization is an important factor leading to
relative growth of public expenditure in modern times. Urbanization is responsible
for the increase in expenditure on water supply, electricity, construction and
maintenance of hospitals, schools and other public services.
6. Growth of Democracy: Growth of democracy and socialism has been responsible for
the increasing tendency of public expenditure to a great extent. In a democracy, to
achieve the goodwill of the public, the ruling party has to incur heavy expenditure on
providing variety of services and facilities to the public. Expenditure on elections and by
elections is increasing every year. Number of ministries and executive offices has also been
increased. As a result of this the public expenditure increases rapidly.
7. Rising Trend of Prices: Public expenditure is also increasing in every country due to
rising trend of prices. The reason is that the government has to buy goods and services
from the market at higher prices. The government has also to increase the salaries,
dearness allowance etc., of government employees leading to a rapid increase in
government expenditure.
8. Increase in the Activities of the State: In recent years, activities of the state,
particularly in the social and economic fields, such as education, public health, public
recreation, public works, commerce and industry, five year plans, etc. have increased
tremendously.
9. The planning effects: In a less developed economy, the government adopts
economic planning for the development of the country. In a planned economy, thus,
when the public sector is expanding its role, the public expenditure shows an increasing
trend. Huge sums are also spent by the government on formulating and implementing
plans.
10. The Rural Development Effect: In an underdeveloped country, the government has
also to spend more and more for rural development. It has to undertake schemes like
community development projects and social measures. The government also incurs
expenditure on imparting training to personnel for implementing rural development
programs.
11. General Expenditure and Internal Security: Internal situation of a country is
becoming uncertain and insecure day by day. Government has been constantly facing
communal and political riots. Hence, to check and control these troubles, the
government has to spend more on the maintenance of law and order. Moreover,
the government is bound to spend huge amounts, as in a free country it is essential that
the just demands of the public are duly considered.
1.3.2.4 Canons of Public Expenditure
The expression “canons of public expenditure” it used for the fundamental rules or
principles governing the spending policy of the government .the following canons of
public expenditure have been laid down Prof. Findley Shirras:
a) Canon of Benefit: This cannon suggest that every public spending must ultimately be
used for the cause of social benefit i.e. for the general well- being of the common people. In
other words, the state spending should confer benefits on the entire community at
large that on an individual group or section. It means public funds should be spent in
such directions which pursue common interest and promote general welfare.
b) Canon of Economy: it implies that public expenditure should be incurred carefully and
economically. Economy here means that wasteful and extravagant expenditure should be
avoided at all levels. Public expenditure must be productive and efficient. Hence, it must
be incurred only on every essential items of common benefit- without duplication in a
way that involves minimum cost. An efficient system of financial administration is
therefore, very essential in any country.
c) Canon of sanction: this cannon suggests that no public spending should be made
without the approval of proper authority. Only obtaining prior sanction is not sufficient. It
must be properly inspected and examined whether the sanctioned amount of money
is being spent properly on sanctioned items or not. As a rule, therefore, money must
be spent on the purpose for which it is sanctioned by the highest authority and accounts
properly audited.
d) Canon of Surplus: this cannon suggests that saving is a virtue even for the
government, so an ideal budget is one which contains an element of surplus by
keeping public expenditure below public revenue. In other words, public authorities
should aim at surplus of income over expenditure and they should avoid deficits.
Frequent and huge deficits lead to uncontrollable financial situation with dire
consequences of inflation. Therefore, every government should attempt to balance its
income and expenditure.
e) Canon of Elasticity: this canon requires that the expenditure policy of the state should
be such that changes must be possible in the expenses according to the change in
requirements and circumstances. In other words, there should be scope for charges in
public expenditure according to the requirements of the country.
f) Canon of Productivity: This canon or principle implies that the expenditure
policy of the Governments should be such that would encourage production in a
country. That means a large part of public expenditure must be allocated for
development purpose.
g) Canon of Equity: One of the foremost aims of public expenditure is also to ensure the
just and equitable distribution of is more significant for the countries where the gap
between the highest income and the lowest income groups is very wide.
Underdeveloped countries like India, have given this aim a significant and particular
importance in the economic activities of the State and in their fiscal policies.
1.3.3 Public debt:
Increasing need of government for funds cannot be fully met by taxation alone in under
developed and developing countries due to limited scope of taxation. Government therefore
has to resort to alternate sources. Rising of debt is one such source. This includes both
internal debt and external debt.
Public debt is a study of various principles and methods raising debts and their economic
effects and methods of repayments.
In under developed and developing countries, internal sources are limited. Under
developed and developing countries, therefore go for external debt. The transfer of capital at
international level may take the form of:
Political subordination
Other obligation
Excess supply of goods and services in debtor country
However, such external inflows help to achieve faster growth.
Financial Administration deals with the methods of budget preparation, various types of
budget, etc. Financial Administration refers to the mechanism by which the financial
functions are carried on.
The use of public revenue and public expenditure is to secure stability in levels of prices by
controlling inflations as well as deflation pressures is studied.
Similarly, the income and expenditure policies adopted by the government attain full
employment, optimum use of resources, equitable distribution of income etc are also studied
Chapter Two
2. Meaning and Characteristics of Taxation
2.1 Meaning of Taxation
Taxation is one of the systems that government uses to collect public revenues from various
sources. However, taxation is the most important system of collecting public revenue in
modern economic system. Taxation is the most powerful instrument in the hands of the
government for transferring purchasing power from individuals to government. The money
collected through taxation – tax revenue – is used to finance government operations. That is,
the money required by the government to undertake different functions –taxes– is collected
from the citizens. Without taxes to fund its activities, government could not exist. Thus, a
government uses taxation as a system of raising the lion share of its revenue. Government
uses the money collected through taxation:
Tax is defined as an amount of money levied by a government on its citizens and used to run
the country. A tax is an involuntary fee or more precisely "unrequited payment" made by
individuals or businesses to a government without quid pro quo.
Duties are also taxes. Duties are distinguished from taxes by their strictly economic
characteristic. For example, any government imposes a compulsory levy on the goods
imported from a foreign country. This compulsory levy is called Custom Duty. Custom duty
is compulsory a levy on individuals and companies importing goods to the country and its
purpose is to protect the domestic market and economy. When goods are imported from
abroad while the same goods can be produced within the country, it affects the domestic
market and economy in number of ways as follows:
and commodities etc. raises tax revenues. In fact, tax is the major source of revenue to
the Government. According to Adam Smith, "a tax is a contribution from citizens for the
support of the Government".
No one likes taxes, but they are a necessary evil in any civilized society. Whether we
believe in big government or small government, governments must have some resources
in order to perform their essential services. So how does one go about evaluating a
particular tax?
Taxation is an important instrument for the development of economy of the country. A
good tax system ensures maximum social advantage without any hardship on taxpayers.
While framing the tax policy, the government should consider not only its financial needs
but also taxable capacity of the community. Besides the above, government has to
consider some other principles like equality, simplicity, convenience etc. These
principles are called as "Canons of Taxation". The following are the important canons
of taxation.
I. Canons Advocated by Adam Smith
1. Canon of Equality.
2. Canon of Certainty.
3. Canon of Convenience.
4. Canon of Economy.
II. Canons Advocated by Others:
5. Canon of Productivity.
6. Canon of Elasticity.
7. Canon of Diversity.
8. Canon of Simplicity.
9. Canon of Expediency.
10. Canon of Co-ordination.
11. Canon of Neutrality.
Canons Advocated by Adam Smith:
No one has yet come up with a better set of criteria for judging a tax than the Canons of
Taxation first proposed by Adam Smith more than two hundred years ago. Adam Smith in
his book, “Wealth of Nations” has explained the four canons of taxation that are mentioned
above. All accepts them as good taxation policy. We shall now explain them briefly.
treasury of the state". This principle states that the minimum possible amount should be
spent on tax collection and the maximum part of the collection should be brought to the
Government treasury.
Taxation should be economical i.e. this should be much more than mere saving in the cost
of collection. Undue outlay on the official machinery of levy is but one part of the loss that
taxation may inflict. It is a far greater evil to hinder the normal growth of industry and
commerce, and therefore to check the growth of the fund from which future taxation is to
come. Thus the canon of „Economy' is naturally sub-divided into two parts viz.,
1. „Taxation should be inexpensive in collection', and
2. „Taxation should retard as little as possible the growth of wealth'.
It may also be remarked that there is a close connection between "Economy" and
"Productivity", since the former aids in securing the latter.
3.6.2. Canons Advocated by Others:
Other researchers of taxation at other times have added to Adam Smith’s criteria. Some
have noted that a tax should be adequate, meaning it should produce sufficient revenue to
support whatever it is that citizens want their government to do. Some have argued for a
"Benefit Principle" whereby the amount of tax each is called upon to pay bears some
relationship to the benefits each taxpayer receives from government. Others have argued that
a tax should be neutral in its effect on the way markets work. But Smith’s Canons are the
starting point for any serious evaluation of a tax. The various canons added by others are
explained below:
5. Canon of Productivity: According to C.F. Bastable, the tax system should be
productive enough i.e. it should ensure sufficient revenue to the Government and it should
encourage productive activity by encouraging the people to work, save and invest.
6. Canon of Elasticity: The next principle advocated by Bastable is elasticity. The
taxes should be flexible. It should be levied in such a way to increase or decrease the tax
revenue depending upon the need. For example, during certain unforeseen situations like
floods, war, famine, drought etc. the Government needs more amount of revenue. If the tax
system is elastic in nature, then the Government can raise adequate funds without any extra
cost of collection.
The tax system should be elastic is a desirable canon of taxation. It may, indeed, be
regarded as the agency for realising at once "Productivity" and "Economy". Where the
public revenue does not admit of easy expansion or reduction according to the growth or
decline of expenditure, there are sure to be financial troubles. For this purpose some
important taxes will have to be levied at varying rates. The particular taxes chosen will vary
according to circumstances, but the general principle of flexibility should be recognised and
adopted.
7. Canon of Diversity: According to this principle, there should be diversity in the tax
system of the country. The burden of the tax should be distributed widely on the entire people
of the country. The burden of the tax should be decentralised so that every one should pay
according to his ability. To achieve this, the Government should impose both direct and
indirect taxes of various types. It should not depend upon one or two types of taxes alone.
8. Canon of Simplicity: This principle states that the tax system should be simple, easy
and understandable to the common man. If the tax system is complex and vague, the taxpayer
cannot estimate his tax liability and it will cause irregularities in the payments and leads to
corruption.
9. Canon of Expediency: According to this principle, a tax should be levied after
considering all favorable and unfavorable factors from different angles such as economical,
political and social.
10. Canon of Co-ordination: In a federal set up like Ethiopia, Federal and State
Governments levy taxes. So, there should be a proper co-ordination between different taxes
imposed by various authorities. Otherwise, it will affect the people adversely.
11. Canon of Neutrality: This principle stresses that the tax system should not have any
adverse effect. That is, it shouldn‟t create any deflationary or inflationary effects in the
economy.
Applying Smith‟s Canons to any particular tax is largely a subjective undertaking. Yet, if
one attempts to evaluate the principal taxes – that is, property tax, income tax, and sales tax –
against Smith‟s Canons, one will quickly find that there is no such thing as a perfect tax. The
property tax, for instance, scores fairly low on convenience and efficiency, but fairly high on
certainty. The income tax scores fairly high on equality, but is costly to administer and is so
complicated that it leaves much to be desired on certainty. A sales tax scores high on
convenience, certainty, and efficiency, but poorly on equality. Because there is no perfect
tax, an argument can be made that the best tax system is one that uses all three major types of
taxes in small doses. By combining all three major types, it is possible to offset the
weaknesses of each with the strengths of the others. In the final analysis, however, the
standard for judging a tax is often political. In a democracy, when revenue must be raised,
the tax selected is often based upon plucking the goose that squawks the least. Some have
called this political test the other canon.
These are the general canons that experience seems to prescribe, and which should be
observed in a well-ordered State. Besides, their simplicity has not saved them from frequent
violation. Their value lies in their assertion of truths plain and intelligible to common
understandings but for that very reason too often passed over. A system of taxation, which
conforms to them, may without hesitation be pronounced a good one. Where they are
neglected and broken through, the evil consequences will be almost certainly conspicuous.
A further point deserves notice. There is at first sight a probability of conflict between
the several canons. A productive tax may be inconvenient, as a convenient one may be
unjust, and how, it may be asked, is a solution of the difficulty to be reached? The plain
answer is, by the surrender of the less important canon. The successful administration of the
State is the final object, and therefore convenience, or even equity, may have to yield to
productiveness. But though opposition is possible, agreement is on the whole the ordinary
case. We have seen that economy increases productiveness, but so do certainty and
convenience. Elasticity aids both productiveness and economy, while growing
productiveness in turn permits better observance of all the other canons. There is thus a
harmony in a properly administered financial system that tends to promote its improvement
in the future.
In a democratic country, the political factors are also influencing the tax policy of
government. While deciding an appropriate taxable system, the government has to follow the
above-mentioned canons of taxation.
2.4 Classification of Taxes
1. Classification Based on the Tax Bases
A. Income Taxes: are taxes levied on income of persons or businesses
B. Property Taxes: are levied on a property of Persons or businesses
C. Commodity Taxes: are taxes levied on commodities and services
2. Classification Based on ultimate burden of taxes (Based on Tax Impact, Tax Shifting
and Tax Incidence)
Tax Impact refers to the person who bears the money burden of tax in the first
instance
Tax Incidence refers to the person who ultimately bears the money burden of a tax
Tax Shifting refers to the process by which the money burden of a tax is transferred
from one person to another person.
Based on ultimate burden, taxes are classified into two: Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes
described as follows:
A. Direct Taxes: are taxes the impact and incidence of which fall on the same person.
Direct taxes are taxes which cannot be shifted on to the others. E.g. Employment
income tax
B. Indirect Taxes: these are taxes the impact and incidence of which fall on different
persons. The impact fall on one person and the incidence fall on another person. E.g.
VAT
3. Classification Based on Tax Determinant
A. Ad-valorem Taxes: taxes are determined based on the value of the item to be taxed.
B. Specific Tax: are the taxes levied at a fixed amount, irrespective of the value of the
goods and services
4. Classification Based on Number of Taxes
A. Single Tax: using only one tax in the country. It is a tax on one thing
B. Multiple Taxes: using many kinds of taxes in the country. The government of
modern state uses diversified taxes to use advantage of it
5. Classification based on Taxing Authority
Taxes are classified into three based on taxing authority or taxing hierarchy: Federal Taxes,
State Taxes and Local Taxes
Tax rate structure expresses the relationship between the tax rate and tax base in a country.
Currently nations are using four different types of tax systems: progressive tax system,
proportional tax system, regressive tax system, and degressive tax system.
A proportional tax, also called a flat tax is a system that taxes all entities in a class
typically either citizens or corporations at the same rate (as a proportion on income), as
opposed to a graduated or progressive scheme. The term “Flat Tax” is one where the tax
amount is fixed as a function of income and is a term mainly used in the context of income
taxes.
Advocates say that a flat tax system may arguably have most of the benefits of a
progressive tax, depending on whether the flat rate is combined with a significant threshold.
Usually the flat tax is proposed to kick in at a certain income level, or to exempt income
below that level, so that the lowest-income members of society pay no income tax.
Technically, this is a two stage progressive tax rather than a flat tax.
Advocates of a flat tax claim that it will end unfair discrimination. They also argue that
flat taxes are easier (and cheaper) to administer and comply with than complex, graduated
taxes. Most political parties that advocate the introduction of a flat tax are on the right of the
political spectrum.
Those who oppose a flat tax claim that it will benefit the rich at the expense of the poor.
One argument is that, since most other taxes (sales taxes etc.) tend to be regressive in
practice, making the income tax flat will actually make the overall tax structure regressive
(i.e. lower-income people will pay a higher proportion of their income in total taxes
compared with the affluent). Another argument can be made by looking upon the value of
money to various groups and not simply the rate of taxation. While the monetary value of a
dollar (or other unit of currency) is the same for everyone, it is clearly “Worth” a lot more to
someone who is struggling to afford food than to a millionaire. Taxing everyone at the same
rate ignores the fact that richer people can give up more of their income, without ill effects.
Moreover, it is debatable whether a flat tax would substantially simplify the tax system.
This implies that the rates of taxation should be the same regardless of the size of the income
i.e. "the system in which the rates of taxation remains constant as the tax base changes".
Mathematically, it can be defined as follows: "The amount of tax payable is calculated by
multiplying the tax base with the tax rate".
Tax Payable = Tax Base X Tax Rate
Thus, in the case of proportional tax systems "Multiplier remains constant with the changes in
multiplicand (income)".
Economically, it can be explained as follows:
Example: Proportional Tax System:
Tax Base
Tax Rate in % Amount of Tax (in Birr)
Birr
1500 10 150
6500 10 650
14000 10 1400
23500 10 2350
35500 10 3550
50000 10 5000
A progressive tax or graduated tax is a tax that is larger as a percentage of income for
those with larger incomes. It is usually applied in reference to income taxes, where people
with more income pay a higher percentage of it in taxes. The term progressive refers to the
way the rate progresses from low to high.
Each taxpayer faces two tax rates, his average income tax rate (the proportion of income
spent in income taxes) and his marginal rate (the portion of each additional Birr in income
that would be taken away in taxes). Progressivity of the income tax (higher rates for higher
segments of income) means that marginal tax rates are generally higher than average rates.
Thus, the progressive tax system can be defined as "a system in which rates of taxation
would increase with the increase in income i.e. higher the income, higher would be the rate of
tax". The rates of taxation increases as the tax base increases. This can be explained
mathematically as follows.
The amount of tax payable is calculated by multiplying the tax base with tax rate as
shown below:
Tax Payable = Tax Base X Tax Rate
In this case, "the multiplier increases as the multiplicand (income) increases".
Economically, this can be explained as under:
Progressive Tax System
151 650 10
651 1400 15
1401 2350 20
2351 3550 25
3551 5000 30
From the above example, we can easily understand about the progressive tax system where
the rate of tax increases with the increase in tax base.
It is argued that if the utility gained from income exhibits diminishing marginal returns,
then for the tax burden to be vertically equitable, those with higher incomes must be taxed at
higher rate. The advantages of progressive tax system include the following:
1. Equality in Sacrifice: Under progressive tax system, the rate of taxation increases as
the tax base increases. That is, the burden of taxation is heavy upon the rich than on the poor.
People with higher income tend to have a higher percentage of that in disposable income, and
can thus afford a greater tax burden. Thus, this system secures equality in sacrifice by
ensuring the principle of ability to pay.
2. Reducing the Inequalities of Income and Wealth: Progressive tax system serves as
a powerful instrument for reducing the inequalities of income and wealth.
3. Economy: In the progressive system, the cost of collection does not increase with the
increase in the rate of taxes. Hence, it is justified on the grounds of economy.
4. Elastic: Progressive tax system is elastic in nature to meet the increasing public
expenditure. The government can easily raise its revenue by increasing the rates of taxes. In
the case of progressive taxation, raising the rates for the higher status alone can raise more
revenue.
5. Stabilising the Economy: Progressive tax system may be helpful in preventing the
inflationary trends in the economy as it reduces the disposable income and purchasing power
of the people. Thus, the inflationary trends can be checked and the economic stability can be
achieved.
Limitations of Progressive Tax System:
The following are the demerits of progressive tax system:
In regressive tax system, the amount of tax is smaller as a percentage of income for
people with larger incomes. Many taxes other than the income tax tend to be regressive in
practice. For example, most sales taxes (since lower income people spend a larger portion of
their income), excise duty etc. are regressive in nature if they are levied on the goods of
common consumption.
Thus, regressive tax is a tax, which taxes a larger percentage of income from people
whose income is low. It places more burden on those with lower incomes.
It is the system in which the rate of tax declines with the increase in the income or value
of property. Larger the assess income or property, the lower the percentage that he pays as tax
in regressive taxation. “The tax rate decreases as the tax base increases".
The amount of tax payable is calculated by multiplying the Tax Base with Tax Rate.
Tax Payable = Tax Base X Tax Rate
The schedule of regressive tax rate is one in which the rates of taxation decreases as the tax
base increases.
The following table and diagram will explain the concept of regressive taxation.
Regressive Tax System
Income Rate of Tax (%) Tax To be
Birr Paid (Birr)
4000 20 800
6000 15 900
12000 12 1440
15000 10 1500
As regressive taxes fall more heavily on the poor section of the community, than on the richer
section, it violates the principles of equity and social justice. That is, through regressive
taxation, principle of equity and social justice cannot be followed. In a welfare country like
Ethiopia, whose object is to establish a socialistic state without inequalities in the distribution
of income and wealth, regressive taxation has no place.
Even non-income taxes can regressive relative to income. The regressively of a particular tax
often depends on the propensity of the taxpayers to engage in the taxed activity relative to
their income. To determine whether a tax is regressive, the income-elasticity of the goods
being taxed as well as the income-substitution effect must be considered.
4. DEGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM
Under this system, the rate of tax is mildly progressive up to a certain limit and thereafter
it may be fixed at a flat rate.
The amount of tax payable is calculated by multiplying the Tax Base with the Tax Rate.
Tax Payable = Tax Base X Tax Rate
The concept of degressive taxation can be explained with the help of the following table.
4000 20 % 8, 000
6000 21 % 12, 600
12000 22 % 26, 400
15000 23 % 34, 500
20000 23 % 46, 000
The burden of a tax does not always lie on the person from whom it is collected. In many
cases, it is borne by the other people also. Thus, the person who initially pays the tax may not
be actually bearing its money burden as such. Hence, it is necessary to know who bears the
immediate burden of tax and who bears the ultimate burden of tax. According to the law, the
tax is collected from a particular individual or business unit, which has paid the tax in the first
instance and may transfer it to someone else. If such a shifting of tax takes place, the original
taxpayer has served only as a collecting agent.
In the process of taxing, three concepts are involved. They are as follows:
1. A tax may be imposed on some person.
2. It may be transferred by him to another person i.e. second person.
3. It may be ultimately borne by the second person.
Thus,
a) Impact of a tax is on the person who bears the money burden in the first instance.
b) Shifting of a tax refers to the process by which the money burden of a tax is transferred from
one person to another person.
c) Incidence of a tax refers to the money burden of a tax, which is on the person who ultimately
bears it.
2.6.1. Impact:
The impact of a tax is on the person who pays the tax in first instance. In other words, the
person who pays the tax to the government in the first instance bears its impact. Therefore,
the impact of a tax is the immediate result of the imposition of a tax on the person who pays it
in the first instance. It refers to the immediate burden of the tax and not to the ultimate
burden of the tax.
2.6.2. Incidence:
Incidence of a tax means the final or ultimate resting place of the burden of the tax payment. It refers to the
point at which "tax chickens finally come to the roost ". That is, the location of the ultimate tax burden. The
incidence of a tax is different from its impact, which refers to the point of original
assessment.
If an individual who pays the tax in the first instance finds that he cannot transfer or shift the
burden of the tax to anybody else, then the incidence as well as the impact is on the same
person. If the original or the first taxpayer is able to transfer or shift the tax burden to
someone else, then the shifting of tax will be taken place. For example, the Government
levies a tax say, excise duty on cement and collects the tax from the manufacturer of cement.
Now, the impact of the tax is on the manufacturer. If he is able to pass on the money burden
of the tax to the wholesaler by means of raising the price, then the manufacturer has shifted
the tax i.e. he transferred the money burden to the wholesaler. This process continues and
ultimately the consumer bears the money burden of the tax. Hence, the incidence is on the
final consumer.
There are two major economic principles in the analysis of taxation. They are: (i) the
incidence of the tax, and (ii) its effects on economic efficiency (referred to as the excess
burden or welfare cost of the tax). These principles are applicable to all taxes.
Concepts of Tax Incidence:
The main issue in the economic analysis of any tax is the identification of the individual
or group of individuals on whom the burden of the tax rests. This is the incidence of the tax.
There are two concepts of tax incidence. They are as follows:
1. Legal Incidence: The individual or group of individuals who have the legal
responsibility for paying the tax to the government bears the legal incidence of the tax.
It refers to the process by which the money burden of a tax is transferred from one person
to another. Whenever there is a shifting of taxation, the tax may be shifted either forward or
backward.
A producer, upon whom a tax has been imposed, may shift the tax burden to the
consumer or to the factors of production. If the producer shifts the tax burden to the
consumer, it is known as "Forward Shifting". On the other hand, if the producer shifts the
tax burden to the factors of production i.e. to the suppliers of raw materials etc., it is known
as "Backward Shifting". The backward shifting can be taken place by compelling the
supplier to reduce the price of raw materials etc.
1. The impact refers to the initial money burden of the tax. But the incidence refers to ultimate
money burden of tax.
2. The impact is felt by the person from whom tax is collected. But the incidence is felt by the
person who actually pays tax.
3. Impact can be shifted. But incidence cannot be shifted.
2.7 Tax Avoidance, Evasion and Delinquency
Thus, tax avoidance means legal minimisation of tax burden by the taxpayers.
1. Suppose a taxpayer‟s total income exceeds the maximum tax-free amount, then he has to pay
the tax on such excess amount. But if he invests the excess amount in any of the approved
schemes for which there is a relief in the tax law, he can save on tax altogether.
2. An individual sells his let out house property (long-term capital asset) for Birr.2,00,000
making a capital gain of Birr 60,000. This capital gain would normally be taxed. But, if he
invests the sale proceeds in a particular manner stipulated by law, he need not pay any tax.
3. Divorcing the wife on paper so that her income is not added together with husband‟s income
is also a common device for tax avoidance.
1. A trader makes a sale for Birr.20, 000 and does not account it, in his books under sales. He is
evading tax.
2. An individual lends his money of Birr.50, 000 to another person at 20% interest per annum
and does not include this income in his total income.
3. Under-invoicing of sales and inflation of purchases.
4. A manufacturing business employs 30 workers but include 2 more additional namesake
workers (not in actual) in the muster roles. The sum shown as paid to such additional
namesake workers will amount to evasion.
Human intelligence devices new methods of evasion and the Governments are constantly
trying to remove the loopholes in the tax laws.
Causes of Tax Evasion:
The following are the important causes for Tax evasion:
1. Multiplicity of Tax Laws: A number of laws enacted for the recovery of a variety of
taxes often leads to widespread tax evasion.
2. Complicated Tax Laws: Complicated tax laws are another reason for tax evasion.
The tax laws contain a number of exemptions, deductions, rebates, relief, surcharges and so
on. For example: the Income Tax Act has 28 chapters and 298 sections including sub-
sections. So, such complication in tax-laws is also a root-cause for the tax evasion.
3. High Rates of Taxation: High rates of taxes cause widespread tax evasion, because
the greater the risk undertaken for the purpose of tax evasion, the greater is the reward.
4. Inadequate Information as to Sources of Tax Revenue: Lack of adequate
information as to the sources of revenue also contributes to tax evasions. In Ethiopia, small
businessmen and farmers rarely maintain any accounts of their income.
5. Investment in Real Property: Investment in real property, both movable and
immovable, and concealment of its true ownership have also been a major cause for tax
evasion. All these facilitate the channelising of black money into profitable ways.
6. Ineffective Tax Enforcement: Lack of proper training and efficiency for the
authorities enforcing the tax laws is also a major cause for widespread tax evasion.
7. Deterioration of Moral Standards: There has been deterioration in standards of
moral behaviour of people since independence. The values, which formed the basis of
Society, are shown little respect. In this modern competitive world, the deterioration of moral
standards, among the people leads to falsification of accounts, mis-representation of facts and
fraudulent behaviour.
2. Reduction in Tax Rates: The prevalence of high rates is the first and foremost reason
for this tax evasion. Hence, the rate of tax should be reduced to a reasonable level.
3. Replacement of Sales Tax & Excise Duties with VAT: As the crosschecking is
possible in the case of VAT, it is more effective. Hence, such tax can be introduced instead of
sales and excise duties.
4. Tax on Agricultural Income: Agricultural income is exempted from income tax and
for this reason it is used to convert the black money into white. In recent years, agricultural
farms and orchards, and vineyards have come to be acquired by industrialists; film stars etc.
because this enables their owners to whiten their black money. Tax evasions can be avoided
by taxing the agricultural income at normal rates.
5. Maintenance of Proper Accounts: Maintenance of proper accounts should be made
compulsory for persons whose business and professional income exceeds a prescribed limit.
In the Income Tax law, a provision to this effect has been introduced recently.
6. Introduction of Expenditure Tax: In Ethiopia, expenditure tax is levied in the form
of commodity taxation such as excise duties, VAT, Turnover tax etc. There is no personal
expenditure taxation. However, it is recognised by all that if a tax is based on personal
expenditure and if all effective machinery is devised to investigate and ascertain personal
expenditure, tax evasion can considerably be reduced.
7. Tightening of Tax Enforcement: This may be said to be the crucial remedy if the
penalties for violation of tax laws are strictly enforced, incidence of tax evasion could
automatically be reduced.