APPENDIX TABLE 1.

Quantitative Data (Ova) Mcmaster Technique for Day 0

R1 R2 R3
T1 20% 4 27 12 11 17 14 8 14

T2 50% 20 15 4 17 24 2 19 1

T3 100% 6 9 13 1 22 12 5 17
T4 - 29 4 7 19 7 8 12 15
T5 + 7 5 22 22 4 2 24 7

APPENDIX TABLE 2. Quantitative Data (Ova) Mcmaster Technique for Day 7

R1 R2 R3
T1 20% 6 14 5 7 14 10 0 16
T2 50% 5 15 1 8 9 7 6 4
T3 100% 2 1 6 0 12 6 1 6
T4 - 25 13 5 22 6 4 13 11
T5 + 0 0 5 7 0 0 6 0

APPENDIX TABLE 3. Quantitative Data (Ova) Mcmaster Technique for Day 14

R1 R2 R3

T1 20% 8 10 4 5 11 6 0 6

T2 50% 0 14 0 0 6 2 1 8
T3 100% 0 1 5 0 4 8 0 4
T4 - 5 28 11 15 7 3 11 9
T5 + 0 0 4 5 0 0 4 0

APPENDIX TABLE 4. Quantitative Data (Ova) Mcmaster Technique for Day 21

R1 R2 R3
T1 20% 4 12 4 0 13 4 0 7
T2 50% 0 11 0 2 8 2 5 5
T3 100% 0 0 2 0 4 3 0 1
T4 - 8 21 15 8 14 4 14 7
T5 + 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
ANOVA at 5% day 0

Summary of Data Result Details

Treatments Source
1 2 3 4 5 Total Between-tr
N 9 9 9 9 9 45 Within-tre
∑X 109 114 98 107 104 532 Total
Mean 12.1111 12.6667 10.8889 11.8889 11.5556 11.822
∑X2 1759 2016 1398 1785 1808 8766
Std.Dev. 7.4068 8.4558 6.4313 8.0069 8.705 7.5024

ANOVA at 5% day 7
Summary of Data Result Details
Treatments Source
1 2 3 4 5 Total Between-tr
N 9 9 9 9 9 45 Within-tre
∑X 76 62 34 109 22 303 Total

Mean 8.4444 6.8889 3.7778 12.1111 2.4444 6.733

∑X2 874 546 258 1745 126 3549

Std.Dev. 5.3877 3.855 4.0242 7.2877 3.0046 5.8558

ANOVA at 5% day 14
Summary of Data Result Details
Treatments Source
1 2 3 4 5 Total Between-tr
N 9 9 9 9 9 45 Within-tre
∑X 50 42 22 97 14 225 Total
Mean 5.5556 4.6667 2.4444 10.7778 1.5556 5
∑X2 398 422 122 1479 58 2479
Std.Dev. 3.8766 5.3151 2.9202 7.3617 2.1279 5.5473

ANOVA at 5% day 21
Summary of Data Result Details
Treatments Source
 1 2 3 4 5 Total Between-tr
N 9 9 9 9 9 45 Within-tre
∑X 49 40 10 108 5 212 Total
Mean 5.4444 4.4444 1.1111 12 0.5556 4.711
∑X2 435 292 30 1540 9 2306
Std.Dev. 4.5856 3.7786 1.5366 5.5227 0.8819 5.4507
 Comparison on the initial mean number of eggs per gram before administrat
mean number of eggs per gram after deworming for nematodes at day 7.
R3 AVERAGE EPG
2 12.111111111 605.55555556
Pre- Post-
Treatments administration administration
12 12.666666667 633.33333333 mean EPG mean EPG

13 10.888888889 544.44444444 T1 20% 695.56 422.22

6 11.888888889 594.44444444 T2 50% 633.33 344.44
11 11.555555556 577.77777778 T3 100% 544.44 188.89
T4 - 594.44 605.56
T5 + 577.78 122.22
R3 AVERAGE EPG Comparison on the initial mean number of eggs per gram before administration
4 8.4444444444 422.22222222 mean number of eggs per gram after deworming for nematodes at day 14.
7 6.8888888889 344.44444444 Pre- Post-
0 3.7777777778 188.88888889 Treatments administration administration
10 12.111111111 605.55555556 mean EPG mean EPG
4 2.4444444444 122.22222222 T1 20% 695.56 277.78
T2 50% 633.33 233.33
T3 100% 544.44 122.22
R3 AVERAGE EPG T4 - 594.44 538.89

0 5.5555555556 277.77777778 T5 + 577.78 77.78

11 4.6666666667 233.33333333 Comparison on the initial mean number of eggs per gram before administration
0 2.4444444444 122.22222222 mean number of eggs per gram after deworming for nematodes at day 21.
8 10.777777778 538.88888889 Pre- Post-
1 1.5555555556 77.777777778 Treatments administration administration
mean EPG mean EPG
T1 20% 695.56 272.22
R3 AVERAGE EPG T2 50% 633.33 222.22
5 5.4444444444 272.22222222 T3 100% 544.44 55.56
7 4.4444444444 222.22222222 T4 - 594.44 600
0 1.1111111111 55.555555556 T5 + 577.78 27.78
17 12 600
2 0.5555555556 27.777777778
Result Details

SS df MS
15.6889 4 3.9222 F = 0.06375
2460.8889 40 61.5222
2476.5778 44

Result Details
SS df MS
531.0222 4 132.7556 F = 5.43091
977.7778 40 24.4444
1508.8 44

Result Details
SS df MS
469.7778 4 117.4444 F = 5.31289
884.2222 40 22.1056
1354 44

Result Details
SS df MS
 755.6889 4 188.9222 F = 13.70105
551.5556 40 13.7889
1307.2444 44
 eggs per gram before administration of the dewormer with the *MAKE USE OF THIS DATA
ming for nematodes at day 7.
Day 0
T1 T2
EPG
Reduction % Reduction Ranking
20% 50%

273.34 39.30 4 A 4 20
288.89 45.61 3 R1 B 27 15
355.55 65.31 2 C 12 4
-11.12 -1.87 5 A 11 17
455.56 78.85 1 R2 B 17 24
eggs per gram before administration of the dewormer with the C 14 2
ming for nematodes at day 14. A 8 19
EPG R3 B 14 1
Reduction % Reduction Ranking C 2 12
mean 12.111111 12.66667
417.78 60.06 4
400 63.16 3
422.22 77.55 2 Day 7
55.55 9.34 5 T1 T2

500 86.54 1 20% 50%

eggs per gram before administration of the dewormer with the A 6 5

ming for nematodes at day 21. R1 B 14 15
EPG C 5 1
Reduction % Reduction Ranking A 7 8
R2 B 14 9
423.34 60.86 4 C 10 7
411.11 64.91 3 A 0 6
488.88 89.80 2 R3 B 16 4
-5.56 -0.94 5 C 4 7
550 95.19 1 mean 8.4444444 6.888889

Day 14
 T1 T2

20% 50%

A 8 0
R1 B 10 14
C 4 0
A 5 0
R2 B 11 6
C 6 2
A 0 1
R3 B 6 8
C 0 11
mean 5.5555556 4.666667

Day 21
T1 T2

20% 50%

A 4 0
R1 B 12 11
C 4 0
A 0 2
R2 B 13 8
C 4 2
A 0 5
R3 B 7 5
C 5 7
mean 5.4444444 4.444444
 WORM COUNT PER BIRD
Day 0 Day 0
T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

6 29 7 A 200 1000
9 4 5 R1 B 1350 750
13 7 22 C 600 200
1 19 22 A 550 850
22 7 4 R2 B 850 1200
12 8 2 C 700 100
5 12 24 A 400 950
17 15 7 R3 B 700 50
13 6 11 C 100 600
10.88889 11.88889 11.55556 mean 605.5556 633.3333

Day 7 Day 7
T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

2 25 0 A 300 250
1 13 0 R1 B 700 750
6 5 5 C 250 50
0 22 7 A 350 400
12 6 0 R2 B 700 450
6 4 0 C 500 350
1 13 6 A 0 300
6 11 0 R3 B 800 200
0 10 4 C 200 350
3.777778 12.11111 2.444444 mean 422.2222 344.4444

Day 14 Day 14
 T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

0 5 0 A 400 0
1 28 0 R1 B 500 700
5 11 4 C 200 0
0 15 5 A 250 0
4 7 0 R2 B 550 300
8 3 0 C 300 100
0 11 4 A 0 50
4 9 0 R3 B 300 400
0 8 1 C 0 550
2.444444 10.77778 1.555556 mean 277.7778 233.3333

Day 21 Day 21
T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

0 8 0 A 200 0
0 21 0 R1 B 600 550
2 15 0 C 200 0
0 8 2 A 0 100
4 14 0 R2 B 650 400
3 4 0 C 200 100
0 14 1 A 0 250
1 7 0 R3 B 350 250
0 17 2 C 250 350
1.111111 12 0.555556 mean 272.2222 222.2222
Day 0
T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
100%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

300 1450 350

450 200 250
650 350 1100
50 950 1100
1100 350 200
600 400 100
250 600 1200
850 750 350
650 300 550
544.4444 594.4444 577.7778

EGG COUNT REDUCTION

Day 7 Day 7
T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

100 1250 0 A -100 750

50 650 0 R1 B 650 0
300 250 250 C 350 150
0 1100 350 A 200 450
600 300 0 R2 B 150 750
300 200 0 C 200 -250
50 650 300 A 400 650
300 550 0 R3 B -100 -150
0 500 200 C -100 250
188.8889 605.5556 122.2222 mean 183.3333 288.8889

Day 14 Day 14
 T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

0 250 0 A -200 1000

50 1400 0 R1 B 850 50
250 550 200 C 400 200
0 750 250 A 300 850
200 350 0 R2 B 300 900
400 150 0 C 400 0
0 550 200 A 400 900
200 450 0 R3 B 400 -350
0 400 50 C 100 50
122.2222 538.8889 77.77778 mean 327.7778 400

Day 21 Day 21
T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

0 400 0 A 0 1000
0 1050 0 R1 B 750 200
100 750 0 C 400 200
0 400 100 A 550 750
200 700 0 R2 B 200 800
150 200 0 C 500 0
0 700 50 A 400 700
50 350 0 R3 B 350 -200
0 850 100 C -150 250
55.55556 600 27.77778 mean 333.3333 411.1111
 %EGG COUNT REDUCTION
Day 7 Day 7
T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

200 200 350 A -50.00 75.00

400 -450 250 R1 B 48.15 0.00
350 100 850 C 58.33 75.00
50 -150 750 A 36.36 52.94
500 50 200 R2 B 17.65 62.50
300 200 100 C 28.57 -250.00
200 -50 900 A 100.00 68.42
550 200 350 R3 B -14.29 -300.00
650 -200 350 C -100.00 41.67
355.5556 -11.1111 455.5556 mean 30.27523 45.61404

Day 14 Day 14
 T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

300 1200 350 A -100.00 100.00

400 -1200 250 R1 B 62.96 6.67
400 -200 900 C 66.67 100.00
50 200 850 A 54.55 100.00
900 0 200 R2 B 35.29 75.00
200 250 100 C 57.14 0.00
250 50 1000 A 100.00 94.74
650 300 350 R3 B 57.14 -700.00
650 -100 500 C 100.00 8.33
422.2222 55.55556 500 mean 54.12844 63.15789

Day 21 Day 21
T3 T4 T5 T1 T2

Negative Positive
Control Control
100% 20% 50%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

300 1050 350 A 0.00 100.00

450 -850 250 R1 B 55.56 26.67
550 -400 1100 C 66.67 100.00
50 550 1000 A 100.00 88.24
900 -350 200 R2 B 23.53 66.67
450 200 100 C 71.43 0.00
250 -100 1150 A 100.00 73.68
800 400 350 R3 B 50.00 -400.00
650 -550 450 C -150.00 41.67
488.8889 -5.55556 550 mean 55.04587 64.91228
Day 7
T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
100%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

66.67 13.79 100.00

88.89 -225.00 100.00
53.85 28.57 77.27
100.00 -15.79 68.18
45.45 14.29 100.00
50.00 50.00 100.00
80.00 -8.33 75.00
64.71 26.67 100.00
100.00 -66.67 63.64
65.30612 -1.86916 78.84615

Day 14
 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
100%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

100.00 82.76 100.00

88.89 -600.00 100.00
61.54 -57.14 81.82
100.00 21.05 77.27
81.82 0.00 100.00
33.33 62.50 100.00
100.00 8.33 83.33
76.47 40.00 100.00
100.00 -33.33 90.91
77.55102 9.345794 86.53846

Day 21
T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
100%
(Distilled (Levamis
water) ole)

100.00 72.41 100.00

100.00 -425.00 100.00
84.62 -114.29 100.00
100.00 57.89 90.91
81.82 -100.00 100.00
75.00 50.00 100.00
100.00 -16.67 95.83
94.12 53.33 100.00
100.00 -183.33 81.82
89.79592 -0.93458 95.19231
*MAKE USE OF THIS DATA
WORM COUNT PER BIRD
Day 0
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 4 20 6 29 7
R1 B 27 15 9 4 5 R1
C 12 4 13 7 22
A 11 17 1 19 22
R2 B 17 24 22 7 4 R2
C 14 2 12 8 2
A 8 19 5 12 24
R3 B 14 1 17 15 7 R3
C 2 12 13 6 11
mean 12.111111 12.66667 10.88889 11.88889 11.55556 mean

Day 7
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 6 5 2 25 0
R1 B 14 15 1 13 0 R1
C 5 1 6 5 5
A 7 8 0 22 7
R2 B 14 9 12 6 0 R2
C 10 7 6 4 0
A 0 6 1 13 6
R3 B 16 4 6 11 0 R3
C 4 7 0 10 4
mean 8.4444444 6.888889 3.777778 12.11111 2.444444 mean

Day 14
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
 Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 8 0 0 5 0
R1 B 10 14 1 28 0 R1
C 4 0 5 11 4
A 5 0 0 15 5
R2 B 11 6 4 7 0 R2
C 6 2 8 3 0
A 0 1 0 11 4
R3 B 6 8 4 9 0 R3
C 0 11 0 8 1
mean 5.5555556 4.666667 2.444444 10.77778 1.555556 mean

Day 21
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 4 0 0 8 0
R1 B 12 11 0 21 0 R1
C 4 0 2 15 0
A 0 2 0 8 2
R2 B 13 8 4 14 0 R2
C 4 2 3 4 0
A 0 5 0 14 1
R3 B 7 5 1 7 0 R3
C 5 7 0 17 2
mean 5.4444444 4.444444 1.111111 12 0.555556 mean
WORM COUNT PER BIRD
Day 0
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 200 1000 300 1450 350

B 1350 750 450 200 250
C 600 200 650 350 1100
A 550 850 50 950 1100
B 850 1200 1100 350 200
C 700 100 600 400 100
A 400 950 250 600 1200
B 700 50 850 750 350
C 100 600 650 300 550
605.5556 633.3333 544.4444 594.4444 577.7778

EGG COUNT REDUCTION

Day 7
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 300 250 100 1250 0 A

B 700 750 50 650 0 R1 B
C 250 50 300 250 250 C
A 350 400 0 1100 350 A
B 700 450 600 300 0 R2 B
C 500 350 300 200 0 C
A 0 300 50 650 300 A
B 800 200 300 550 0 R3 B
C 200 350 0 500 200 C
422.2222 344.4444 188.8889 605.5556 122.2222 mean

Day 14
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
 Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 400 0 0 250 0 A
B 500 700 50 1400 0 R1 B
C 200 0 250 550 200 C
A 250 0 0 750 250 A
B 550 300 200 350 0 R2 B
C 300 100 400 150 0 C
A 0 50 0 550 200 A
B 300 400 200 450 0 R3 B
C 0 550 0 400 50 C
277.7778 233.3333 122.2222 538.8889 77.77778 mean

Day 21
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

A 200 0 0 400 0 A
B 600 550 0 1050 0 R1 B
C 200 0 100 750 0 C
A 0 100 0 400 100 A
B 650 400 200 700 0 R2 B
C 200 100 150 200 0 C
A 0 250 0 700 50 A
B 350 250 50 350 0 R3 B
C 250 350 0 850 100 C
272.2222 222.2222 55.55556 600 27.77778 mean
NT REDUCTION %EGG COUNT REDUCTION
Day 7 Day 7
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T1

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100% 20%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

-100 750 200 200 350 A -50.00

650 0 400 -450 250 R1 B 48.15
350 150 350 100 850 C 58.33
200 450 50 -150 750 A 36.36
150 750 500 50 200 R2 B 17.65
200 -250 300 200 100 C 28.57
400 650 200 -50 900 A 100.00
-100 -150 550 200 350 R3 B -14.29
-100 250 650 -200 350 C -100.00
183.3333 288.8889 355.5556 -11.1111 455.5556 mean 30.27523

Day 14 Day 14
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T1
 Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100% 20%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

-200 1000 300 1200 350 A -100.00

850 50 400 -1200 250 R1 B 62.96
400 200 400 -200 900 C 66.67
300 850 50 200 850 A 54.55
300 900 900 0 200 R2 B 35.29
400 0 200 250 100 C 57.14
400 900 250 50 1000 A 100.00
400 -350 650 300 350 R3 B 57.14
100 50 650 -100 500 C 100.00
327.7778 400 422.2222 55.55556 500 mean 54.12844

Day 21 Day 21
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T1

Negative Positive
Control Control
20% 50% 100% 20%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

0 1000 300 1050 350 A 0.00

750 200 450 -850 250 R1 B 55.56
400 200 550 -400 1100 C 66.67
550 750 50 550 1000 A 100.00
200 800 900 -350 200 R2 B 23.53
500 0 450 200 100 C 71.43
400 700 250 -100 1150 A 100.00
350 -200 800 400 350 R3 B 50.00
-150 250 650 -550 450 C -150.00
333.3333 411.1111 488.8889 -5.55556 550 mean 55.04587
 Day 7
T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

75.00 66.67 13.79 100.00

0.00 88.89 -225.00 100.00
75.00 53.85 28.57 77.27
52.94 100.00 -15.79 68.18
62.50 45.45 14.29 100.00
-250.00 50.00 50.00 100.00
68.42 80.00 -8.33 75.00
-300.00 64.71 26.67 100.00
41.67 100.00 -66.67 63.64
45.61404 65.30612 -1.86916 78.84615

Day 14
T2 T3 T4 T5
 Negative Positive
Control Control
50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

100.00 100.00 82.76 100.00

6.67 88.89 -600.00 100.00
100.00 61.54 -57.14 81.82
100.00 100.00 21.05 77.27
75.00 81.82 0.00 100.00
0.00 33.33 62.50 100.00
94.74 100.00 8.33 83.33
0.00 76.47 40.00 100.00
8.33 100.00 -33.33 90.91
63.15789 77.55102 9.345794 86.53846

Day 21
T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
Control Control
50% 100%
(Distille (Levami
d water) sole)

100.00 100.00 72.41 100.00

26.67 100.00 -425.00 100.00
100.00 84.62 -114.29 100.00
88.24 100.00 57.89 90.91
66.67 81.82 -100.00 100.00
0.00 75.00 50.00 100.00
73.68 100.00 -16.67 95.83
-400.00 94.12 53.33 100.00
41.67 100.00 -183.33 81.82
64.91228 89.79592 -0.93458 95.19231
ANOVA day 7

Summary of Data
Treatments
1 2 3 4 5 Total
N 9 9 9 9 9 45

∑X 274.77 375.53 649.57 -182.47 784.09 1901.49

Mean 30.53 41.7256 72.1744 -20.2744 87.1211 42.255

∑X2 18374.83 24376.58 50399.23 59810.5 70294.21 223255.4

Std.Dev. 35.3308 32.9913 20.9669 83.7489 15.7457 56.9903

Result Details

Source SS df MS

Between-treatments 62602.46 4 15650.61 F = 7.79561

Within-treatments 80304.81 40 2007.62

Total 142907.3 44

The f-ratio value is 7.79561. The p-value is .000096. The result is significant at p < .05.
Post Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)

The Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) procedure facilitates pairwise comparisons within your ANOV

A couple of things to note. First, a blue value for Q (below) indicates a significant result. Second, it's worth bear

Q.05 = 4.0391
Pairwise Comparisons HSD.05 = 60.3259
Q.01 = 4.9308

HSD.01 = 73.6439

T1:T2 M1 = 30.53 11.2 Q = 0.75 (p = .98371)

M2 = 41.73
T1:T3 M1 = 30.53 41.64 Q = 2.79 (p = .29811)
M3 = 72.17

T1:T4 M1 = 30.53 50.8 Q = 3.40 (p = .13486)

M4 = -20.27

T1:T5 M1 = 30.53 56.59 Q = 3.79 (p = .07514)

M5 = 87.12
T2:T3 M2 = 41.73 30.45 Q = 2.04 (p = .60521)
M3 = 72.17
T2:T4 M2 = 41.73 62 Q = 4.15 (p = .04137)
M4 = -20.27
T2:T5 M2 = 41.73 45.4 Q = 3.04 (p = .22006)
M5 = 87.12
T3:T4 M3 = 72.17 92.45 Q = 6.19 (p = .00076)
M4 = -20.27
T3:T5 M3 = 72.17 14.95 Q = 1.00 (p = .95356)
M5 = 87.12
T4:T5 M4 = -20.27 107.4 Q = 7.19 (p = .00009)
M5 = 87.12
ons within your ANOVA data. The F statistic (above) tells you whether there is an overall difference between your sample

econd, it's worth bearing in mind that there is some disagreement about whether Tukey's HSD is appropriate if the F-rati
ence between your sample means. Tukey's HSD test allows you to determine between which of the various pairs of mean

is appropriate if the F-ratio score has not reached significance.

the various pairs of means - if any of them - there is a signficant difference.
ANOVA DAY 14 Post Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)

Summary of Data The Tukey's HSD (honestly significa

Treatments
1 2 3 4 5 Total A couple of things to note. First, a b
N 9 9 9 9 9 45

∑X 433.75 484.74 742.05 -475.83 833.33 2018.04

Mean 48.1944 53.86 82.45 -52.87 92.5922 44.845 Pairwise Comparisons

∑X2 49159.9 44714.55 65341.67 377243.8 77873.68 614333.6

Std.Dev. 59.4302 48.2266 22.8025 209.7876 9.4459 109.1115 T1:T2

Result Details

Source SS df MS T1:T3

Between-t 120011.8 4 30002.95 F = 2.9719

Within-tre 403822.1 40 10095.55 T1:T4

Total 523833.9 44

T1:T5

The f-ratio value is 2.9719. The p-value is .030671. The result is significant at p < .05.

T2:T3

T2:T4
T2:T5

T3:T4

T3:T5

T4:T5
ost Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)

he Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) procedure facilitates pairwise comparisons within your ANOVA data. The

couple of things to note. First, a blue value for Q (below) indicates a significant result. Second, it's worth bearing in mind t

Q.05 = 4.0391 Q.01 =

irwise Comparisons HSD.05 = 135.2784
4.9308

HSD.01 = 165.1434

M1 = 48.19 5.67 Q = 0.17 (p = .99995)

M2 = 53.86

M1 = 48.19 34.26 Q = 1.02 (p = .94987)

M3 = 82.45

M1 = 48.19 101.06 Q = 3.02 (p = .22623)

M4 = -52.87

M1 = 48.19 44.4 Q = 1.33 (p = .88058)

M5 = 92.59

M2 = 53.86 28.59 Q = 0.85 (p = .97371)

M3 = 82.45

M2 = 53.86 106.73 Q = 3.19 (p = .18161)

M4 = -52.87
M2 = 53.86 38.73 Q = 1.16 (p = .92362)

M5 = 92.59

M3 = 82.45 135.32 Q = 4.04 (p = .04990)

M4 = -52.87

M3 = 82.45 10.14 Q = 0.30 (p = .99951)

M5 = 92.59

M4 = -52.87 145.46 Q = 4.34 (p = .02963)

M5 = 92.59
ns within your ANOVA data. The F statistic (above) tells you whether there is an overall difference between your sample m

cond, it's worth bearing in mind that there is some disagreement about whether Tukey's HSD is appropriate if the F-ratio
rence between your sample means. Tukey's HSD test allows you to determine between which of the various pairs of mea

SD is appropriate if the F-ratio score has not reached significance.

of the various pairs of means - if any of them - there is a signficant difference.
ANOVA DAY 21

Summary of Data
Treatments
1 2 3 4 5 Total
N 9 9 9 9 9 45

∑X 317.19 96.93 835.56 -605.66 868.56 1512.58

Mean 35.2433 10.77 92.84 -67.2956 96.5067 33.613

∑X2 58187.71 200107.6 78338.63 251513.5 84142.53 672290

Std.Dev. 76.6558 157.7433 9.7803 162.3096 6.3315 118.8437

Result Details

Source SS df MS

Between-treatments 163534 4 40883.51 F = 3.57128

Within-treatments 457913.8 40 11447.84

Total 621447.8 44

The f-ratio value is 3.57128. The p-value is .013943. The result is significant at p < .05.
Post Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)

The Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) procedure facilitates pairwise comparisons within y

A couple of things to note. First, a blue value for Q (below) indicates a significant result. Second, it's w

Q.05 = 4.0391
Pairwise Comparisons HSD.05 = 144.0540
Q.01 = 4.9308

HSD.01 = 175.8563

T1:T2 M1 = 35.24 24.47 Q = 0.69 (p = .98830)

M2 = 10.77
T1:T3 M1 = 35.24 57.6 Q = 1.61 (p = .78341)
M3 = 92.84

T1:T4 M1 = 35.24 102.54 Q = 2.88 (p = .26937)

M4 = -67.30

T1:T5 M1 = 35.24 61.26 Q = 1.72 (p = .74299)

M5 = 96.51
T2:T3 M2 = 10.77 82.07 Q = 2.30 (p = .48942)
M3 = 92.84
T2:T4 M2 = 10.77 78.07 Q = 2.19 (p = .53857)
M4 = -67.30
T2:T5 M2 = 10.77 85.74 Q = 2.40 (p = .44557)
M5 = 96.51
T3:T4 M3 = 92.84 160.14 Q = 4.49 (p = .02278)
M4 = -67.30
T3:T5 M3 = 92.84 3.67 Q = 0.10 (p = .99999)
M5 = 96.51
T4:T5 M4 = -67.30 163.8 Q = 4.59 (p = .01889)
M5 = 96.51
e comparisons within your ANOVA data. The F statistic (above) tells you whether there is an overall difference between y

ant result. Second, it's worth bearing in mind that there is some disagreement about whether Tukey's HSD is appropriate
erall difference between your sample means. Tukey's HSD test allows you to determine between which of the various pa

Tukey's HSD is appropriate if the F-ratio score has not reached significance.
en which of the various pairs of means - if any of them - there is a signficant difference.