2020 Email Delivery Benchmark
2020 Email Delivery Benchmark
EMAIL
DELIVERABILITY
BENCHMARK
A N A LY S I S O F W O R L D W I D E I N B O X
A N D S P A M P L A C E M E N T R AT E S
03 14
07 19
TABLE OF
CONTENTS 09 22
11 23
What’s even more concerning, is many marketers are unaware their messages
are missing the inbox. Misconceptions about metrics and lack of data lead
many marketers to fall below this average. Without even knowing they have
deliverability issues, marketers will continue to miss out on building valuable
relationships and achieving the highest possible ROI.
Have you ever tested an email campaign’s deliverability by sending it to your personal email address? That’s similar to how seed addresses work. But at
Return Path from Validity, we have seed addresses at hundreds of mailbox providers and filters around the world. When marketers send emails to these seed
addresses, our software checks to see if it was delivered and reports whether it went to the inbox or the spam folder. You can learn more about how seeds
measure deliverability in our guide, “What is a Seed?”
One big shift in the world over the last few years is the focus on data privacy. While GDPR came
into effect in 2018, many other countries and US states have enacted or have proposed new data
privacy laws since, causing marketers to reevaluate their data and marketing practices to comply.
Deliverability can also be impacted by mailbox providers who are constantly evaluating their
current filtering equations to adapt to feedback from their users. For example, Gmail made some
minor changes to their filtering in October of 2019 to which some marketers saw slight dips in
their inbox placement, while others saw no change.
In addition to changes in the industry, any new campaign or tactic you try can have an influence
on your deliverability. It's important to keep a pulse on what's happening both internally and
globally that may influence your deliverability and overall performance.
In the following pages we report the average inbox placement, spam placement, and missing
rates globally, by region, and by country. Take a look at the metrics and compare them against
your own performance.
Note: Due to rounding, some placement calculations will be slightly over or under 100%
Global Inbox
Placement
Globally, the average inbox placement rate was 83 percent
in 2019—meaning one out of every six messages failed to
reach the inbox. Global deliverability saw a slight decline of
two percentage points from the 2018 average of 85 percent.
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -2% +1% 0%
Inbox Placement
In North America
Deliverability to North American inboxes was equal to the global average in
2019, at 83 percent. United States inboxes saw an average of 82 percent inbox
placement in 2019, while marketers sending to Canadian inboxes exceeded the
global and regional average with an inbox placement rate of 89 percent.
2 0 2 0 E M A I L D E L I V E R A B I L I T Y B E N C H M A R K – I N B OX P L AC E M E N T I N N O RT H A M E R I C A 9
INBOX PLACEMENT IN NORTH AMERICA
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -1% +1% 0%
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
90% 90% 89% 87% 89% 82% 82% 81% 82% 82%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change +1% 0% -1% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -1% +1% 0%
Inbox Placement
In Latin America
Like their northern counterpart, inbox placement for countries in Latin America
matched the global average at 83 percent. Argentina led the region with an
average inbox placement rate of 89 percent, while Brazil saw just four out of five
messages reach the inbox (81 percent). Overall inbox placement in Latin
America saw no change year-over-year. Argentina and Brazil saw slight
increases in inbox placement, while Mexico saw a drop in deliverability of five
percentage points.
2 0 2 0 E M A I L D E L I V E R A B I L I T Y B E N C H M A R K – I N B OX P L AC E M E N T I N L AT I N A M E R I C A 11
INBOX PLACEMENT IN LATIN AMERICA
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change 0% -2% +2%
2 0 2 0 E M A I L D E L I V E R A B I L I T Y B E N C H M A R K – I N B O X P L A C E M E N T I N L AT I N A M E R I C A 12
INBOX PLACEMENT IN LATIN AMERICA
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
13% 9% 3% 5% 2% 4% 3%
8% 7% 12% 13% 10% 10%
3% 6%
4% 5% 4% 5%
5%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change +1% 0% -1% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -5% -1% +7%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change +1% -2% +1%
2 0 2 0 E M A I L D E L I V E R A B I L I T Y B E N C H M A R K – I N B O X P L A C E M E N T I N L AT I N A M E R I C A 13
2020 EMAIL DELIVERABILITY BENCHMARK
Inbox Placement
In Europe
Deliverability to European mailboxes fell slightly from the previous year
to an average inbox placement rate of 84 percent—just above the
global average. Marketers sending to subscribers in Belgium and the
Czech Republic had Europe’s highest inbox placement at 92 percent.
One quarter of messages sent to German mailboxes failed to reach
consumers, while messages to Swiss subscribers saw an inbox
placement of just 67 percent.
The Czech Republic and the Netherlands were the only European
countries to see an increase in deliverability compared to the previous
year (12 percentage points and three percentage points, respectively).
Russia and Ireland saw the largest declines in inbox placement, down
seven percentage points compared to the previous year.
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -3% 0% +3%
AUSTRIA BELGIUM
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
5% 9% 12% 9% 9% 6% 6% 19% 1% 3% 8%
12% 13% 11% 11% 12%
83% 79% 77% 80% 80% 94% 94% 81% 96% 92%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -3% -1% +4% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change 0% 0% 0%
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
83% 94% 96% 95% 92% 77% 74% 77% 80% 77%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change +12% -15% +3% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -3% +1% +2%
FRANCE GERMANY
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
91% 88% 89% 89% 89% 75% 76% 73% 74% 74%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -2% -1% +2% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -2% -2% +4%
GREECE IRELAND
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
94% 70% 90% 93% 87% 88% 74% 77% 82% 82%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -3% +1% +3% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -7% +1% +6%
ITALY NETHERLANDS
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
83% 84% 82% 83% 83% 86% 86% 86% 88% 87%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -3% -1% +3% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change +3% -2% -1%
NORWAY RUSSIA
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
88% 83% 89% 92% 88% 91% 84% 82% 83% 85%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -2% 0% +2% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -7% +6% +1%
SPAIN SWEDEN
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
83% 83% 81% 85% 83% 89% 88% 89% 88% 89%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change 0% +1% -1% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -1% +1% -1%
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
70% 70% 68% 61% 67% 89% 86% 85% 86% 87%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -5% +1% +4% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -4% 0% +5%
Inbox Placement
In Asia-Pacific
Marketers sending to mailboxes in the Asia-Pacific region had an average
inbox placement rate of 84 percent in 2019. Messages in Japan saw the
highest inbox placement of all countries studied at 97 percent. Emails to
South Korean inboxes were successfully delivered only 74 percent of the
time, while in India only 69 percent of emails reached subscribers’ inboxes.
2 0 2 0 E M A I L D E L I V E R A B I L I T Y B E N C H M A R K – I N B OX P L A C E M E N T I N A S I A- PA C I F I C 19
INBOX PLACEMENT IN ASIA-PACIFIC
86% 3% 11% 84% 3% 14% 83% 3% 15% 84% 3% 13% 84% 3% 13%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -2% 0% +2%
AUSTRALIA CHINA
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
90% 86% 87% 90% 88% 80% 82% 81% 77% 80%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change 0% -1% +1% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change +4% 0% -3%
2 0 2 0 E M A I L D E L I V E R A B I L I T Y B E N C H M A R K – I N B OX P L A C E M E N T I N A S I A- PA C I F I C 20
INBOX PLACEMENT IN ASIA-PACIFIC
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
3%
2% 2% 2%
3%
91% 88% 87% 89% 89% 69% 67% 67% 74% 69%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -3% 0% +3% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -1% 0% 0%
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
96% 96% 98% 98% 97% 90% 89% 88% 85% 88%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change 0% 0% 0% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -4% +2% +2%
2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average 2019 - Q1 2019 - Q2 2019 - Q3 2019 - Q4 YTD Average
9% 7%
88% 82% 79% 83% 83% 87% 82% 66% 65% 74%
Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -10% 0% +10% Inbox Placement Rate Spam Placement Rate Missing Rate % Change -20% +7% +13%
2 0 2 0 E M A I L D E L I V E R A B I L I T Y B E N C H M A R K – I N B OX P L A C E M E N T I N A S I A- PA C I F I C 21
GETTING TO THE INBOX
One out of every six messages failed to reach subscribers in 2019—that's a lot of potential revenue marketers are missing out on. While reaching the inbox isn’t an easy
matter, there are a few simple steps that can increase the chances your messages will pass through filters and reach your subscribers.
You can’t fix a problem you don’t know about. Having access Keeping a subscriber list free from spam traps, unknown
to and monitoring your inbox placement rate will allow you to users, and inactive subscribers will help boost your
more accurately judge the health of your program and can reputation and your ability to reach the inbox. Run your entire
alert you to when your messages are being blocked by list through a list hygiene service and make sure any new
mailbox providers. addresses you add are verified as real, active email accounts.