Micro Link TVET College: Learning Guide # 07
Micro Link TVET College: Learning Guide # 07
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SUPPORT SERVICE
Level II
LEARNING GUIDE # 07
Unit of Competence: Update and Document Operational Procedures
Module Title : Updating and Documenting Operational
Procedures
LG Code : ICT ITS2 LO2 07
TTLM Code : ICT ITS2 TTLM02 0817
yes
LO 2: Update procedures
\
This learning guide is developed to provide you the necessary information regarding the following content
coverage and topics –
This guide will also assist you to attain the learning outcome stated in the cover page.
Specifically, upon completion of this Learning Guide, you will be able to –
Learning Activities
Your teacher will evaluate your output either satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If unsatisfactory, your teacher
shall advice you on additional work. But if satisfactory you can proceed to the next topic.
Operational Procedures
An Operating Procedure (OP) is a set of written instructions that document a routine on repetitive
activity followed by an organization. The development and use of Ops are an integral part of a successful
quality system as it provides individuals with the information to perform a job properly, and facilitates
consistency in the quality and integrity of a product or end-result.
The term “OP” may not always be appropriate and terms such as protocols, instructions,
worksheets, and laboratory operating procedures may also be used. For this document “OP” will be used.
Purpose
OP details the regularly recurring work processes that are to be conducted or followed within an
organization. They document the way activities are to be performed to facilitate consistent conformance to
technical and quality system requirements and to support data quality.
They may describe, for example, fundamental programmatic actions and technical actions such as
analytical processes, and processes for maintaining, calibrating, and using equipment. OPs are intended to
be specific to the organization or facility whose activities are described and assist that organization to
maintain their quality control and quality assurance processes and ensure compliance with governmental
regulations.
If not written correctly, SOPs are of limited value. In addition, the best written SOPs will fail if they
are not followed. Therefore, the use of SOPs needs to be reviewed and re-enforced by management,
preferably the direct supervisor. Current copies of the SOPs also need to be readily accessible for reference
in the work areas of those individuals actually performing the activity, either in hard copy or electronic
format, otherwise SOPs serve little purpose.
Benefits
The development and use of SOPs minimizes variation and promotes quality through consistent
implementation of a process or procedure within the organization, even if there are temporary or
permanent personal changes. SOPs can indicate compliance with organizational and governmental
requirements and can be used as a part of a personnel training program, since they should provide detailed
work instructions. It minimizes opportunities for miscommunication and can address safety concerns.
Writing Styles
SOP PROCESS
SOP Preparation
The organization should have a procedure in place for determining what procedures or processes
need to be documented. Those OPs should then be written by individuals knowledgeable with the activity
and the organization's internal structure. These individuals are essentially subject-matter experts who
actually perform the work or use the process.
A team approach can be followed, especially for multi-tasked processes where the experiences of a
number of individuals are critical, which also promotes “buy-in”/interest from potential users of the SOP.
SOPs should be written with sufficient detail so that someone with limited experience with or
knowledge of the procedure, but with a basic understanding, can successfully reproduce the procedure
when unsupervised. The experience requirement for performing an activity should be noted in the section on
personnel qualifications. For example, if a basic chemistry or biological course experience or additional
training is required that requirement should be indicated.
SOPs should be reviewed (that is, validated) by one or more individuals with appropriate training and
experience with the process. It is especially helpful if draft SOPs are actually tested by individuals other than
the original writer before the SOPs are finalized.
The finalized SOPs should be approved as described in the organization’s Quality Management Plan
or its own SOP for preparation of SOPs. Generally the immediate supervisor, such as a section or branch
chief, and the organization’s quality assurance officer review and approve each SOP. Signature approval
indicates that an SOP has been both reviewed and approved by management.
SOPs should be also systematically reviewed on a periodic basis, e.g. every 1-2 years, to ensure
that the policies and procedures remain current and appropriate, or to determine whether the SOPs are
even needed. The review date should be added to each SOP that has been reviewed. If an SOP describes a
process that is no longer followed, it should be withdrawn from the current file and archived.
Document Control
Each organization should develop a numbering system to systematically identify and label their
SOPs, and the document control should be described in its Quality Management Plan.
Generally, each page of an SOP should have control documentation notation, similar to that
illustrated below. A short title and identification (ID) number can serve as a reference designation. The
revision number and date are very useful in identifying the SOP in use when reviewing historical data and
is critical when the need for evidentiary records is involved and when the activity is being reviewed. When
the number of pages is indicated, the user can quickly check if the SOP is complete. Generally this type of
document control notation is located in the upper right-hand corner of each document page following the title
page.
Short Title/ID #
Rev. #:
Date:
Page 1 of
As noted above, the Quality Management Plan should indicate the individual(s) responsible for
assuring that only the current version is used. That plan should also designated where, and how, outdated
Learning guide 07 Date 08-2020 Page 5 of 7
Author: IT Experts
Training, Teaching and Learning Materials Development Lo2
versions are to be maintained or archived in a manner to prevent their continued use, as well as to be
available for historical data review.
Electronic storage and retrieval mechanisms are usually easier to access than a hard-copy document
format. For the user, electronic access can be limited to a read-only format, thereby protecting against
unauthorized changes made to the document.
Submit procedure
Prepare standard procedure for installation of programs from CD/DVD on Windows 7 System.
Title Page
The first page or cover page of each SOP should contain the following information: a title that clearly
identifies the activity or procedure, an SOP identification (ID) number, date of issue and/or revision, the
name of the applicable agency, division, and/or branch to which this SOP applies, and the signatures and
signature dates of those individuals who prepared and approved the SOP. Electronic signatures are
acceptable for SOPs maintained on a computerized database.
Table of Contents
A Table of Contents may be needed for quick reference, especially if the SOP is long, for locating
information and to denote changes or revisions made only to certain sections of an SOP.
Text
Well-written SOPs should first briefly describe the purpose of the work or process, including any
regulatory information or standards that are appropriate to the SOP process, and the scope to indicate
what is covered. Define any specialized or unusual terms either in a separate definition section or in the
appropriate discussion section. Denote what sequential procedures should be followed, divided into
significant sections; e.g., possible interferences, equipment needed, personnel qualifications, and safety
considerations (preferably listed in bold to capture the attention of the user). Finally, describe next all
appropriate QA and quality control (QC) activities for that procedure, and list any cited or significant
references.
Attach any appropriate information, e.g., an SOP may reference other SOPs. In such a case, the
following should be included:
1. Cite the other SOP and attach a copy, or reference where it may be easily located.
2. If the referenced SOP is not to be followed exactly, the required modification should be specified
in the SOP at the section where the other SOP is cited.