Oasys - Concrete Codes Comparision
Oasys - Concrete Codes Comparision
Central Square
Forth Street
Newcastle Upon Tyne
NE1 3PL
Telephone: +44 (0) 191 238 7559
e-mail: [email protected]
Website: oasys-software.com
Oasys
© Oasys 1985 – 2021
All rights reserved. No parts of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means - graphic, electronic,
or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems - without
the written permission of the publisher.
Products that are referred to in this document may be either trademarks and/or registered trademarks of the
respective owners. The publisher and the author make no claim to these trademarks.
While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this document, the publisher and the author
assume no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of information
contained in this document or from the use of programs and source code that may accompany it. In no event
shall the publisher and the author be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damage caused or
alleged to have been caused directly or indirectly by this document.
Oasys
Contents
Notation 6
Design Codes 7
Concrete material models 8
Units 8
Parabola-rectangle 10
EC2 Confined 11
Rectangle 11
Bilinear 13
FIB 13
Popovics 14
Mander & Mander confined curve 16
BS8110-2 tension curve 17
TR59 18
Interpolated 19
Concrete properties 20
ACI 21
AS 23
BS 5400 24
BS 8110 26
CSA A23.3 / CSA S6 27
EN 1992 28
HK CP 30
IRS Bridge 34
Creep 43
EN 1992-1-1 43
AS 3600 – 2009 44
Hong Kong Code of Practice 45
ACI 209.2R-18 47
IRC : 112-2011 48
IS 456 : 2000 49
IRS Concrete Bridge Code : 1997 49
Notation
Symbol Represents
Concrete strength (with code variations)
fc
f Concrete Stress
ε Concrete strain
εc Strain at which concrete stress is maximum
Design Codes
The following design codes are supported to varying degrees in the Oasys software products.
Hong Kong Structures Design Manual for Hong Kong 2013 2002
Structures Design Highways and Railways
Manual
IRC:112 Code of Practice for Concrete Road India 2011
Bridges
IRS Concrete Code of Practice for Plain, Reinforced India 1997
Bridge Code & Prestressed Concrete for General
Bridge Construction
I.S. EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 Ireland 2004
I.S. EN 1992-2 Eurocode 2-2 Ireland 2005
IS 456 Plain and reinforced concrete – Code India 2000
of Practice
NEN EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 Netherlands 2004
NEN EN 1992-2 Eurocode 2-2 Netherlands 2011
NF EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 France 2005
NF EN 1992-2 Eurocode 2-2 France 2006
NS-EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 Norway 2004
PN-EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 Poland 2008
SFS-EN1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 Finland
UNE-EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 Spain 2010/
2013
UNE-EN 1992-2 Eurocode 2-2 Spain 2010
UNI EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2-1-1 Italy 2004
UNI EN 1992-2 Eurocode 2-2 Italy 2006
Different material models are available for different design codes. These are summarised below:
IRS Bridge
CSA A23.3
ACI 318 /
AASHTO
EN 1992
HK SDM
BS 5400
BS 8110
AS 3600
IRC:112
CSA S6
HK CP
IS 456
Compression
Parabola-
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
rectangle
Rectangle ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Bilinear ● ●
Linear ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
FIB ● ● ● ● ●
Popovics ● ● ● ●
EC2 Confined ● ●
Explicit ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Tension
No-tension ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Linear ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Interpolated ● ● ● ● ● ●
BS8110 - 2 ● ● ●
TR 59 ● ● ●
PD 6687 ●
Explicit ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Explicit
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
envelope
Parabola-rectangle
At strains above
ε
c the stress remains constant. For most design codes the parabola is taken
as having zero slope where it meets the horizontal portion of the stress-strain curve.
2
f ε
f cd [ ( )]
= 1− 1−
εc
The Hong Kong Code of Practice (supported by the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers) interpret
the curve so that the initial slope is the elastic modulus (meaning that the parabola is not
tangent to the horizontal portion of the curve).
f E ε 2 E ε
f cd [ ( )]( ) ( )( )
= 1−
Es εc
+
Es εc
f cd
Es =
εc
n
f ε
f cd [ ( )]
= 1− 1−
εc
and
n=2 fc ≤ 50MPa
4
n=1. 4 +23 . 4 [ ( 90−f c ) /100 ] fc > 50MPa
EC2 Confined
The EC2 confined model is a variant on the parabola-rectangle. In this case the confining stress
σ increases the compressive strength and the plateau and failure strains.
f c ( 1+5 σ / f c ) σ ≤0 .05 f c
f c,c=
{ f c ( 1 .125+ 2. 5 σ / f c ) σ > 0. 05 f c
ε c , c=ε c ( f c ,c /f c )2
ε cu, c=ε cu +0. 2 σ / f c
Rectangle
constant stress of
α f cd .
α β
BS5400 0.6/0.67 1
BS8110 1 0.9
0.9 fc ≤ 45MPa
HK CP 2007 > 1 0.8 fc ≤ 70MPa
0.72 fc ≤ 100MPa
HK SDM 0.6/0.67 1
Bilinear
The bilinear curve is linear to the point ( ε c , f cd ) and then constant to failure.
FIB
The FIB model code defines a schematic stress-strain curve. This is used in BS 8110-2, EN1992-1
and IRC:112.
This is defined as
2
f kη−η
=
f cFIB 1+ ( k−2 ) η
with
Ec
k =α
f c /ε c
Code f cFIB α
Popovics
These have been adjusted and are based on the Thorenfeldt base curve.
f n
=k 3 η
fc n−1+η nk
with (in MPa)
ε
η=
εc
10
k 3 =0 . 6+
fc
fc
n=0. 8+
17
fc n
ε c=
Ec n−1
1 η≤1
k=
{
0. 67 +
fc
62
η>1
ε pop=ε c
All the concrete models require a strength value and a pair of strains: the strain at peak stress or
transition strain and the failure strain.
The Mander1 curve is available for both strength and serviceability analysis and the Mander
confined curve for strength analysis.
For unconfined concrete, the peak of the stress-strain curve occurs at a stress equal to the
Esec =f c /ε c
and
E
r=
E−Esec
ηr
σ =f c
r −1+ ηr
where
ε
η=
εc
1
Mander J, Priestly M, and Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal
of Structural Engineering, 114(8), pp1804-1826, 1988.
strain
εcu,c also needs to be estimated. This is an iterative calculation, limited by hoop rupture,
with possible values ranging from 0.01 to 0.06. An estimate of the strain could be made from EC2
formula (3.27) above with an upper limit of 0.01.
f c,c
[ ( )]
ε c , c=ε c 1+5
fc
−1
Esec=f c ,c /ε c , c
and
E
r=
E−Esec
as before.
ηr
σ =f c , c
r −1+ηr
where
ε
η=
εc , c
TR59
Technical report 59 defines an envelope for use with concrete in tension for serviceability. The
material is assumed to behave in a linearly elastic manner, with the elastic modulus reduced
beyond the peak stress/strain point based on the envelope in the figures below
Interpolated
ACI318 and several other codes give a method to compute a value of the second moment of area
3 3
M M cr
Ma( )
I e= cr
[ ( )]
I g + 1−
Ma
I cr
where
M cr is the cracking moment and
Ma is the applied moment.
AdSec SLS analyses determine a strain plane intermediate to the uncracked and fully cracked
strain planes. The program determines a value for ζ , the proportion of the fully cracked
strain plane to add to the proportion ( 1−ζ ) of the uncracked plane so that the resulting plane
is compatible with ACI318’s approach. Unfortunately, since ACI318’s expression is an
interpolation of the inverse of the curvatures, rather than the curvatures themselves, there is no
1
κ=
[ α / κ I + (1−α ) / κ II ] ,
κ=ζκ II + ( 1−ζ ) κ I ,
1
ζ=
[ 1+( κ II / κ I ) /( 1/ α −1 ) ]
The ratio
κ II /κ I is appropriate for uniaxial bending. For applied loads ( N , M y , M z ) , and
uncracked and fully cracked strain planes ( ε I ,κ yI ,κ zI ) and ( ε II , κ yII ,κ zII ) respectively,
The ratio is also inappropriate for general loading. For the general case, it is
f /σ
replaced by the ratio ( ct tI ) , where
f
ct is the tensile strength of the concrete and σ tI
is the maximum concrete tensile stress on the uncracked section under applied loads.
( Nε II + M y κ yII + M z κ zII ) / ( Nε I + M y κ yI + M z κ zI )
Summary:
[
ζ =1/ 1+
( σ tI / f ct )3 −1 ]
Since ζ is larger for short-term loading, all curvatures and strains are calculated based on
Concrete properties
Notation
fc concrete strength
E elastic modulus
εβ ε β =( 1−β ) ε u
AASHTO
The density of normal weight concrete is assumed to be 145 lb/ft3 (approx.. 2300kg/m3).
(with
f 'c in psi)
f ct=3. 5 √ f 'c
The elastic modulus is given in 5.4.2.6 as
E=2500 f ' 1
c 3
FIB
EC2 Confined
ACI
f cd =0 .85 f c
The tensile strength is given in Equation 9-10 by
f ct=0. 62 √ f c
E=4 .7 √ f c
FIB
EC2 Confined
AS
f cd =α 2 f c
with
α 2=1−0 . 003 f c
and limits of [0.67:0.85]
f ct=0. 6 √ f c
The elastic modulus is given (in MPa) in 3.1.2 as
1. 5
E= ρ ×0 .043 √ f cmi f cmi ≤40 MPa
1. 5
E= ρ ×0 .024 √ f cmi +0 .1 f cmi >40 MPa
This tabulated in Table 3.1.2.
fc (M
E (G
Pa) Pa)
20 24.0
25 26.7
32 30.1
40 32.8
50 34.8
65 37.4
80 39.6
100 42.2
Parabola-rectangle
Bilinear
FIB
EC2 Confined
BS 5400
f cd =0 .6 f c /γ
The tensile strength is given in 6.3.4.2 as
f ct=0. 36 √ f c
but A.2.2 implies a value of 1MPa should be used at the position of tensile reinforcement.
fc E
(MPa) (GPa)
20 25.0
25 26.0
32 28.0
40 31.0
50 34.0
60 36.0
Rectangle
Bilinear
FIB
Popovics
EC2 Confined
fc
ε RP =2. 4×10
−4
√ γ
BS 8110
The density of normal weight concrete is given in section 7.2 of BS 8110-2 as 2400kg/m 3.
f cd =0 .67 f c /γ
The tensile strength is given in 4.3.8.4 as
f ct=0. 36 √ f c
but Figure 3.1 in BS 8110-2 implies a value of 1MPa should be used at the position of tensile
reinforcement.
E=20+0 .2 f c
The strains are defined as
Rectangle εu εcu εβ
Bilinear
Linear εu εmax
FIB εu 0.0022
Popovics
EC2 Confined
Explicit εu εcu εu
0 .0035 f c≤ 60 MPa
εu=
{
0 . 0035−0 . 001×
( f c −60 )
50
fc
ε RP =2. 4×10−4
√ γ
The density of normal weight concrete is assumed to be 2300 kg/m 3; see 8.6.2.2 (A23.3) and
8.4.1.7 (S6).
The tensile strength is given in Equation 8.3 (A23.3) and 8.4.1.8.1 in (S6)
For normal weight concrete the modulus is given in A23.3 Equation 8.2.
E=4 . 5 √ f c
and in CSA S6 8.4.1.7
E=3 .0 √ f c +6 . 9
The strains are defined as
FIB
EC2 Confined
EN 1992
f cd =α cc f c /γ
For the rectangular stress block this is modified to
f cd =α cc f c /γ f c≤50 MPa
f cd =α cc 1 .25 ( 1−f c /250 ) f c /γ f c >50 MPa
The tensile strength is given in Table 3.1 as
f ct= 0. 3 f 2
c 3
f c≤50 MPa
Popovics
)
0 . 002 f c ≤50 MPa
ε c 2=
{
0 . 002+0 . 000085 ( f ck −50 ) 0. 53
HK CP
f cd =0 .67 f c /γ
The tensile strength is given in 12.3.8.4 as
f ct=0. 36 √ f c
but 7.3.6 implies a value of 1MPa should be used at the position of tensile reinforcement.
E=3.46 √ fc+3.21
The strains are defined as
Rectangle εu εcu εβ
Bilinear
Linear εu εu
FIB εu 0.0022
Popovics
EC2 Confined
Explicit εu εcu εu
fc
E d =3 . 46
√
γ
+3. 21 GPa
f c/ γ
ε RP =1. 34
Ed
HK SDM
f cd =0 .6 f c /γ
The tensile strength is given in 6.3.4.2 as
f ct=0. 36 √ f c
but from BS5400 a value of 1MPa should be used at the position of tensile reinforcement.
fc (MPa)
E (GPa)
20 18.9
25 20.2
32 21.7
40 24.0
45 26.0
50 27.4
55 28.8
60 30.2
Rectangle
Bilinear
FIB
Popovics
EC2 Confined
fc
ε RP =2. 4×10
−4
√ γ
IRC 112
f cd =0 .67 f c /γ
In A2.9(2) the strength is modified for the rectangular stress block to
0. 3
f +10
E=22 c
12. 5 ( )
The strains are defined as
Popovics
0. 31
ε c 1=0. 00653 ( f c +10 ) ≤0 . 0028
IRS Bridge
f cd =0 .6 f c /γ
The tensile strength is given in 16.4.4.3 as
f ct=0. 37 √ f c
The elastic modulus is tabulated in 5.2.2.1
fc (MPa)
E (GPa)
20 25.0
25 26.0
32 28.0
40 31.0
50 34.0
60 36.0
Rectangle
Bilinear
FIB
Popovics
EC2 Confined
fc
ε RP =2. 4×10
−4
√ γ
IRC 456
f cd =0 .67 f c /γ
The tensile strength is inferred from 6.2.2 as
f ct=0.7 √ f c
The elastic modulus is defined in 6.2.3.1
E=5 √ f c
The strains are defined as
Bilinear
Popovics
EC2 Confined
f rebar stress
fy rebar strength
ε rebar strain
Different material models are available for different design codes. These are summarised below:
EN 1992
HK SDM
BS 5400
BS 8110
AS 3600
ACI 318
IRC:112
CSA S6
HK CP
IS 456
CSA
IRS
Elastic-
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
plastic
Elastic-
● ●
hardening
BS 5400 ● ●
Pre-stress ● ● ● ●
Progressive
● ●
yield
Park ●
Linear ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
No-
compressio ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
n
ASTM
● ●
strand
Explicit ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Elastic-plastic
The initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E . Post-yield the stress remains constant
Elastic-hardening
The initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E , after yield the hardening modulus Eh
defined in terms of a hardening coefficient k and the final point is ( ε uk , kf yd ) where the
( k −1 ) f y E h ( ε uk −f y / E )
Eh = k= +1
ε uk −f y / E fy
BS 5400
In tension the initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E , until the stress reaches
k e f yd . The slope then reduces until the material is fully plastic,
f yd , at
ε=ε off +f yd / E
In compression the initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E , until the stress reaches
k e f yd or a strain of
ε off . It then follows the slope of the tension curve post-yield and when
Pre-stress
The initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E , until the stress reaches k e f yd . The
Progressive yield
The initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E , until the stress reaches
k f
e yd . The
slope then reduces in a series of steps until the material is fully plastic, after which the stress
remain constant. The points defining the progressive yield are code dependent.
Park
The initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E , until the stress reaches yd f . The
slope is then zero for a short strain range, then rising to a peak stress before failure.
p
ε u −ε
σ =f ud −( f ud −f yd )
( )
ε u −ε p
ε u−ε p
p=E
( f ud −f yd )
Linear
The initial slope is defined by the elastic modulus, E , until the failure strain is reached.
No-compression
ASTM strand
The ASTM A 416 defines a stress-strain curve doe seven-wire strands. This has an initial linear
relationship up to a strain of 0.008 with progressive yield till failure.
σ =E p εε≤0 .008
0 . 433
σ =1749− ε >0 .008
ε−0 . 00614
For Grade 1860 strand
σ =E p εε≤0 .008
0 . 517
σ =1848− ε > 0. 008
ε−0 . 0065
2
Bridge Engineering Handbook, Ed. Wah-Fah Chen, Lian Duan, CRC Press 1999
3
Commentary on CSA S6-14, Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, CSA Group, 2014
A more detailed discussion of modelling strands can be found in the paper 4 by Devalapura and
Tadros
Creep
EN 1992-1-1
ϕ ( t , t 0 ) =ϕ 0⋅β ( t , t 0 )
with
ϕ 0 =ϕ RH⋅β ( f cm )⋅β ( t 0 )
1−RH /100
ϕ RH =1+
0 .1 √3 h0 for
f cm ≤35
1−RH /100
ϕ RH = 1+
[ 0 . 1 3√h0 ]
⋅α 1 α 2
for
f cm >35
16 .8
β ( f cm ) =
√ f cm
1
β ( t0 )=
0 . 1+ t
0 0. 2
and
0 .3
t −t 0
β ( t , t0 )=
[ β H ( t −t 0 ) ]
And t is he age of the concrete,
t0 the age of the concrete at the time of loading and
βH a
coefficient depending on the relative humidity RH as a percentage and notional member size
(in mm)
h0 .
4
Stress-Strain Modeling of 270 ksi Low-Relaxation Prestressing Strands, Devalapura R K & Tadros
M K, PCI Journal, March April 1992
0. 7 0. 2 0. 5
35 35 35
α 1=
f cm [ ] α 2=
[ ]
f cm
α 3=
[ ]
f cm
and
2 Ac
h0 =
u
u being the perimeter in contact with the atmosphere.
where α is
AS 3600 – 2009
ϕ cc =k 2 k 3 k 4 k 5 ϕcc ,b
And
α 2 t 0. 8
k 2= 0 .8
t +0 . 15 t h
0.70 – arid
0.65 – interior
With
0 .7
α 3=
k 4 α2
ϕ c =K L K m K c K e K j
Where the factors are derived from code charts.
Km and
Kj can be approximated by5
2
K m ( t 0 ) =1−bL+cL
with
Cement a b c
OPC 1.36 0.276 0.0132
RHPC 1.09 0.333 0.0366
and
α
( t−t0 )
Kj ( t −t 0 ) = α
β+ ( t −t 0 )
with
where
t ,t 0 are defined in weeks
ACI 209.2R-18
ϕ u =2. 35 γ c
γ c=γ c , t γ c, RH γ c, d γ c ,s γ c ,ψ γ c , α
0
with
γ c, t 0 =1 .25 t
0−0 .118 for moist curing
γ c , t 0 =1 .13 t
0−0 . 094 for steam curing
IRC : 112-2011
ϕ ( t , t 0 ) =ϕ 0⋅β ( t , t 0 )
with
ϕ 0 =ϕ RH⋅β ( f cm )⋅β ( t 0 )
1−RH /100
ϕ RH =1+
0 .1 √3 h0 for
f cm ≤45
1−RH /100
ϕ RH = 1+
[ 0 . 1 √ h0
3
]
⋅α 1 α 2
for
f cm ≤45
18. 78
β ( f cm ) =
√ f cm
1
β ( t 0 )=
0 . 1+ t
0 0. 2
and
0 .3
t −t 0
β ( t , t0 )=
[ β H ( t −t 0 ) ]
t
And t is he age of the concrete, 0 the age of the concrete at the time of loading and H a β
coefficient depending on the relative humidity as a percentage and notional member size (in
mm)
h0 .
2 Ac
h0 =
u
u being the perimeter in contact with the atmosphere.
IS 456 : 2000
6
Code specifies a value of 35MPa, but 45MPa seems more correct.
28 days 1.6
1 year 1.1