Micro Hyrdo Power
Micro Hyrdo Power
MICRO-HYDROPOWER SYSTEMS
1. INTRODUCTION
Flowing and falling water have potential energy. Hydropower comes from converting energy in flowing
water by means of a water wheel or through a turbine into useful mechanical power. This power is converted
into electricity using an electric generator.
Micro-hydropower systems are relatively small power sources that are appropriate in most cases for
individual users or groups of users who are independent of the electricity supply grid. Hydropower systems are
classified as large, medium, small, mini and micro according to their installed power generation capacity.
Electrical power is measured in watts (W), kilowatts (kW) or megawatts (MW). A micro-hydropower system is
generally classified as having a generating capacity of less than 100 kW. Systems that have an installation
capacity of between 100 kW and 1000 kW (1.0 MW) are referred to as mini-hydro. Small hydro is defined as
having a capacity of more than 1.0 MW and up to 10 MW.
42
51707-IC-3-2004-1-CZ-ERASMUS-IPUC-2
Many micro-hydropower systems operate “run of river,” which means that neither a large dam or water
storage reservoir is built nor is land flooded. Only a fraction of the available stream flow at a given time is used
to generate power, and this has little environmental impact. The amount of energy that can be captured depends
on the amount of water flowing per second (the flow rate) and the height from which the water falls (the head).
If somebody is thinking seriously about installing a micro-hydropower system, he will want to plan a system
that is sure to meet his energy and power needs. There are also various planning stages that are needed to
consider. Many factors contribute to a successful micro-hydropower system.
Power calculation
The amount of power available from a micro-hydropower system is directly related to the flow rate, head
and the force of gravity. Now there must be determined the usable flow rate (the amount of flow that can be
diverted for power generation) and the available head for the particular site, it can be calculated the amount of
electrical power that can be expected to generate. This is calculated using the following equation:
Pth = Q · H · g (1)
Example 1
A site has a head of 10 m with flow of 0,3 m3/s; therefore, the potential power output is given by Q × H × g (0,3
× 10 × 9,8), which is 29,4 kW.
43
51707-IC-3-2004-1-CZ-ERASMUS-IPUC-2
This is only the theoretical available power, assuming that 100 percent of the power available in the water
can be usefully converted. Efficiency of the system also needs to be taken into account. Energy is always lost
when converted from one form to another, and all of the equipment used to convert the power available in the
flowing water to electrical power is less than 100 percent efficient. To calculate the most realistic power output
from the site, there must be taken into account the friction losses in the penstock pipes and the efficiency of the
turbine and generator.
When determining the head, it is needed to consider gross head and net head. Gross head is the vertical
distance between the top of the penstock that conveys the water under pressure and the point where the water
discharges from the turbine. Net head is the available head after subtracting the head loss due to friction in the
penstock from the total (gross) head (net head = gross head – losses in the penstock). Small water turbines rarely
have efficiencies better than 80 percent. Potential power will also be lost in the penstock pipe that carries the
water to the turbine because of frictional losses. Through careful design, however, this loss can be reduced to a
small percentage; normally, the losses can be kept to 5 to 10 percent. Typically, overall efficiencies for electrical
generation systems can vary from 50 to 70 percent, with higher overall efficiencies occurring in high-head
systems. Generally, overall efficiencies are also lower for smaller systems. As a rule, the “water to wire”
efficiency factor for small systems (for example, up to 10 kW) could be taken as approximately 50 percent; for
larger systems (larger than 10 kW) the efficiency factor is generally from 60 to 70 percent. Therefore, to
determine a realistic power output, the theoretical power must be multiplied by an efficiency factor of 0.5 to 0.7,
depending on the capacity and type of system.
P=Q·H·g·e (2)
Where: e efficiency factor (0,5 to 0,7)
Example 2
A turbine generator set to operate at a head of 10 m with flow of 0,3 m3/s will deliver approximately 15 kW
of electricity. This is given by P = Q (0,3) × H (10) × g (9,8) × e (0,5) = 14,7 kW, assuming an overall system
efficiency of 50 percent.
These calculations will give an idea of how much power there can be obtained from the water resource.
Table 1 shows how much electrical power you can expect with various heads and water-flow rates.
Table 1. Typical Power Output (in Watts) With Various Head and Water-Flow Rates
Flow Rate [lps]
Head [m] 5 10 15 20 40 60 80 100 150 200
1 25 49 74 98 196 294 392 490 735 980
2 49 98 147 196 392 588 784 980 1470 1960
4 98 196 294 392 784 1176 1568 1960 2940 3920
8 196 392 588 784 1568 2352 3136 3920 5880 7840
10 245 490 735 980 1960 2940 3920 4900 7350 9800
15 368 735 1103 1470 2940 4410 5880 7350 13230 17640
20 490 980 1470 1960 3920 5880 7840 9800 17640 23520
30 735 1470 2205 2940 5880 8820 14112 17640 26460 35280
40 980 1960 2940 3920 7840 14112 18816 23520 35280 47040
60 1470 2940 4410 5880 14112 21168 28224 35280 52920 70560
80 1960 3920 5880 7840 18816 28224 37632 47040 70560 94080
90 2205 4410 6615 8820 21168 31752 42336 52920 79380 105840
100 2450 4900 7350 9800 23520 35280 47040 58800 88200 117600
44
51707-IC-3-2004-1-CZ-ERASMUS-IPUC-2
Water Wheels
Water wheels are the traditional means of converting useful energy from flowing and falling water into
mechanical power. Although not as efficient as turbines, they are still a viable option for producing electricity for
domestic purposes. They are simple to control, lend themselves to do-it-yourself projects and are aesthetically
pleasing. There are three basic types of water wheels: undershot, breastshot and overshot. Variations are
Poncelet and pitchback types. The major disadvantage is that they run relatively slowly and require a high ratio
gearbox or other means of increasing the speed if they are to drive a generator.
Turbine Efficiency
Typical efficiency ranges of turbines and water wheels are given in Table 3. Turbines are chosen or are
sometimes tailor-made according to site conditions. Selecting the right turbine is one of the most important parts
45
51707-IC-3-2004-1-CZ-ERASMUS-IPUC-2
of designing a micro-hydropower system, and the skills of an engineer are needed in order to choose the most
effective turbine for a site, taking into consideration cost, variations in head, variations in flow, the amount of
sediment in the water and overall reliability of the turbine.
46
51707-IC-3-2004-1-CZ-ERASMUS-IPUC-2
conditions, you may even need to consider an underground power line, which generally costs considerably more
than overhead lines but may be safer.
4. CONCLUSION
Hydroelectric generation may offer an opportunity for farms off the utility power grid to supply their own
electrical energy at a lower cost than running an engine/generator or than extending the grid to their property.
However systems may only be possible when it is appropriate to pay a premium over utility electrical rates as
electrical cost per kWh (especially for small systems) may be greater than the utility rate.
Unlike the seasonal fluctuations of solar and wind energy, micro-hydro power can provide constant year-
round electricity for boats or remote locations lucky enough to have constant running water. Like most
alternative energy sources, micro-hydro power is emission-free and very low-impact on the environment.
For commercial and industrial use, a micro-hydro generator could be used to power river signal buoys, or
any riverside installations, as well as commercial marine applications.
5. REFERENCES
[1] Natural Resources Canada: Micro-Hydropower Systems: A Buyer’s Guide, 2004, Cat. No. M144-
29/2004E, ISBN 0-662-35880-5. available on internet < http://www.aea.nt.ca/tips/documents/MICRO-
HYDRO.pdf >
[2] Lance Brown: ON-FARM HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION. [online], Order No. 430.200-1, May
2006. [published: May 2006], [cited: June 2006], available on internet
< http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/resmgmt/publist/400series/430200-1.pdf >
[3] Celso Penche: Layman's guide on how to develop a small hydro site. Commission of the European
Communities, Directorate-General for Energy by European Small Hydropower Association (ESHA).
1997. ISBN DG XVII - 97/010, available on internet
< http://microhydropower.net/download/layman2.pdf >
This work was supported by Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic and
the Slovak Academy of Sciences under the project VEGA No. 1/3141/06.
Author address:
Ing. Dušan Medveď
Katedra elektroenergetiky,
Fakulta elektrotechniky a informatiky, Technická Univerzita v Košiciach
Mäsiarska 74
042 01 Košice, Slovenská Republika
E-mail: [email protected]
Tel: +421 55 602 3560
47