Field Study II
Field Study II
Year Published:
April 2018
Lesson 4 Action Research Process
Guided Practice
A. Preliminary Activity. Analyze previous action research. Look at the
alignment between the following parts of the research.
Research Topic Research Methodology Data Needed
Questions
1) Improving The following This study utilized an This study aims to
the Reading questions are action research apply the 4R
Comprehensio derived from the design. According to Strategy in
n of Grade 8 study problem: Clark et al. 2020, improving Grade 8
Learners a. What is the action research is a struggling readers
Using 4RS pre-test method of conducting reading
(Read, reading educational research. comprehension. The
Retell, comprehension Educators and implementation of
React, level of professionals commonly 4R in this study
Reflect) students using use this approach to frames Richard
Strategy the 4R examine and improve Sagor’s Four-Stage
strategy? the pedagogy and Model of action
Authors: b. What is the practice of an research. Sagor’s
Chryzl Jor post-test educational model provides a
Deluao reading practitioner. In this clear path for
Desiree Jor E. comprehension sense, action research using action
Bernal level of represents an inquiry. Listed
Jally Be F. students using extension of the below is the four-
Padillo the 4R reflection and stage process to
Rex A. Lim strategy? critical self- be implemented as
c. Is there a reflection that a a 4R Strategy.
Year Published: significant teacher employs daily.
May 2022 difference Action research
between pre- integrates theory and
Grade Level:8 test and post- practices through
test transformation and
comprehension reflection in a
levels of problematic situation
students using within a mutually
4R? acceptable ethical
framework.
The implementation of
4R in this study
frames Richard Sagor’s
Four-Stage Model of
action research.
Sagor’s model provides
a clear path for using
action inquiry. Listed
below is the four-
stage process to be
implemented as a 4R
Strategy.
2) The Effects After ten years This study is a The study utilized
of NSTP on of its descriptive survey a survey-type
the Lives of implementation in type of research. questionnaire
Saint Louis SLU, NSTP has According to Calmorin adapted from
University already undergone and Calmorin5 (2010), Cancino6 (2009) as
Students a long journey. This type is suitable the primary tool
Hence, this study wherever the subjects in gathering data
Author: aimed to vary among themselves needed in the
Marilyn L. determine the and one is interested study but for the
Balmeo, Jeffry effect of NSTP on to know the extent to study, the
P. Falinchao, the development which different researchers
Kathleen Kaye of students. It conditions and changed the
L. Biay, Joyce specifically situations are options from
Karen M. Ebes, sought to answer obtained among these moderately agree
Julienne G. the following subjects. to agree to an
Eclarino, and questions: (1) Particularly, the extent and
Ivy Gail P. How effective focus of the study is moderately
Lao-ang were the NSTP to determine the disagree to
courses influence of NSTP disagree to an
Year for Saint Louis activities on the extent and the
Published:2015 University holistic options very much
students? (2) development of too much and very,
What influences undergraduate students very much to very
did NSTP courses of Saint Louis much and the
provide the University and the researchers made
students along: difficulties they the number of
(a) self- encountered while options from 5 to
improvement; (b) enrolled in both 4 to make it even.
performance; (c) courses of NSTP. The questionnaire
community is composed of two
involvement; and main sections. The
(d)demonstration first section of
of competencies; the questionnaire
and (3) What were requires the
the difficulties students to
encountered by reflect on the
the students extent of the
while enrolled in influences of NSTP
NSTP courses? on the different
aspects of their
lives as
individuals and as
students. The
second section is
all about the
frequency of
difficulties
encountered by the
students while
they
were enrolled in
each course of
NSTP.
3) Improving Upon graduation This action research This study
the Basic at the elementary is anchored on the involved 75 Grade,
Writing level, learners principle of Nunan 7 learners, using
Skills of are expected to (1992) on language purposive
Grade 7 write properly research which states sampling, with the
Learners in and with some that it undergoes a following
Filipino: An creativity. cycle with seven criteria:(1) they
Action Specifically, stages. The first are under the
Research in learners should stage is the classes of the
Filipino have acquired conceptualization researcher; (2)
Language the following phase of the teacher they will submit
writing as the key observer of all the written
Authors: competencies: (1) the identified problem exercises of the
Joey Ramos writing in in the program, and (3)
Cabigao cursive; (2) with classroom. The second they will stay in
correct forms and one is conducting an school up to the
Grade Level:7 shapes of initial end of the period
letters; (3) investigation through of this study. The
Year Published: correct data gathering and basic writing
June, 2021 capitalization of observation in the skills
letters; (4) classroom regarding of the learners
correct learners’ performance. will be assessed
punctuations; (5) The third stage using their
and correct involves the building written outputs
indentions and of hypotheses and the assessment
margins. or scientific guesses shall be based on
based on the pre- the
identified following: (1)
possible causes of the writing in
problems. The fourth cursive; (2)
stage capitalization;
deals with the (3) punctuation;
preparation and (4) spelling; and
implementation (5) paragraphing.
of the appropriate The study covered
strategies or the first semester
interventions that of School Year
might address the 2012-2013, from
problem., The fifth June to October
stage is, assessing 2013.
the effectiveness of
the strategies or
interventions used;
this can be done
through observation or
numerical data to
quantify the
improvement of
learners’ performance
before and after the
intervention. The
sixth stage is the
documentation of the
program results,
whether the
intervention used
marks positive or not-
so-positive effects on
the present condition.
The final stage
involves looking for
possible alternative
intervention programs
even if the
implemented one is
effective. This is to
magnify the essence of
language action
research which is the
continuous search for
improving practice.
4) IMPROVING Specifically, A quasi-experimental The researcher
MATHEMATICS this study sought research method of employed a
PERFORMANCE to answer the investigation was used purposive sampling
AMONG GRADE following in this study. It is design. The
11 STUDENTS questions: to explore whether the participants were
THROUGH Jigsaw technique in the Grade 11
JIGSAW 1) What is the teaching Mathematics students from the
TECHNIQUE level of the contributes to the two strands of
mathematics development of Buug National High
Author: performance of computational skills School in the
Pede I. Casing Grade 11 and the improvement of Technical
Cookery students' performance Vocational and
Grade Level:11 students in mathematics. The Livelihood (TVL)
(Control researcher aims to Track namely:
Year Published: Group) in the assess the Cookery and
April 2018 Diagnostic effectiveness of the Computer Hardware
Test? Jigsaw technique in Servicing.
2) What is the improving Mathematics
level of the performance. Two
mathematics groups are determined
performance of in this study. The
Grade 11 control group uses the
Computer lecture method and the
Hardware experimental group
Servicing uses the Jigsaw
students technique. The level
(Treatment of students' learning
Group) in the is obtained after
Diagnostic administering a
Test? diagnostic test, to
3) What is the both groups and an
level of the evaluation test
mathematics between the two groups
performance of after the
Grade 11 intervention.
Cookery
students
(Control
Group) and
Grade 11
Computer
Hardware
Servicing
students
(Treatment
Group) in the
Evaluation
Test?
4) Is there any
significant
difference in
the
mathematics
performance of
the Diagnostic
Test between
the lecture
method and the
Jigsaw
technique?
5) Is there any
significant
difference in
the
mathematics
performance of
Evaluation
Test results
between the
lecture method
and the Jigsaw
technique?
6) Based on the
findings of
the research,
what action
plan can be
formulated to
improve
Mathematics
performance?
5) IMPACT OF This study aimed This study used the The respondents of
EXPLICIT to answer the quasi-experimental the study were the
TEACHING OF explicit approach method of research. As Grade 11 learners
SENIOR HIGH in research defined by William from Maligaya
SCHOOL STUDENTS writing at Trochim (2016), a National High
IN EMPOWERMENT Maligaya National quasi-experimental School, Maligaya,
TECHNOLOGY High School. design looks a bit Palayan City,
SUBJECT Specifically, it like an experimental Nueva Ecija during
sought to answer design but lacks the A.Y. 2018-2019.
Author: the following key ingredient or There were only 85
Jestoni J. questions: random assignment. Grade 11 learners
Pestano 1. What may the However, the research in the Senior High
level of designs non-equivalent School of Maligaya
Grade Level: performance of groups, pre-test, National High
Senior High the students post-test, and School. Thus, the
School be described interrupted time study will use the
in terms of series and identifies random sampling of
Year Published: the following? examples of each one. the learners on
April 2018 1.1 Academic this operation.
Performance
before and
after
instruction
2. Is there a
significant
difference
between the
student’s
academic
performance
before and
after
instruction?
3. How may the
attitude of
the
respondents
towards skills
in ICT after
Instruction?
Reflection
Write your reflection by completing the following statements:
I realized that:
Action study is essential for every educator because it ensures that a
feasible proposition for any social or behavioral problem can be discovered
among students. It entails conducting research on his or her pursuits as
well as potential action to take in strategy to reach them.
IV. Conduct an
action research
similar intervention
to address a
specific problem in
solving for Grade 10
students.
IMPACT OF EXPLICIT Based on the Taking into consideration the
TEACHING OF SENIOR conclusions, the findings of this study, the
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS following following conclusions were
IN EMPOWERMENT recommendations were drawn.
TECHNOLOGY SUBJECT drawn: 1. The comparison of the result
1. The teacher must of the pre-test of both the
Author: include intervention control and
Jestoni J. Pestano and other activities The experimental group is almost
to be carried out in the same.
Grade Level: Senior our classroom 2. The result of the post-test
High School discussion to bring of the experimental group was
about the best noticeably higher than the
Year Published: skills and abilities result of the control group.
April 2018 of our learners. 3. The assessment of the pre-
2. Teachers should test of both the controlled and
facilitate experimental groups was tested
intervention during to be not significant. The
the discussion to assessment of the post-test of
make sure that the both the controlled and
desired competencies experimental group was tested to
can still be be significant, thus
attained by the intervention in Empowerment
students. Technology in ICT aids in
3. Intervention improving the academic
should be applied performance of our students.
from time to time. 4. The most prevailing
perception that intervene in the
personal development of students
as the result of
intervention/innovation was that
they were learning while
enjoying during the discussion
in Empowerment Technology in ICT
with a weighted mean of 4.51 and
a description of “always.”