Teaching Strategy and Mathematics Performance of Maritime Students in The New Normal
Teaching Strategy and Mathematics Performance of Maritime Students in The New Normal
Recommended citation:
Rubio, A.M. (2024). Teaching strategy and mathematics performance of maritime students in the new normal.
Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 2, Number 5, pp. 78–87.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10912995
Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic has abruptly changed educational paradigms, especially in maritime
education. Online learning has presented unprecedented difficulties to instructors' instruction quality and
student results. This study examines how maritime education professors' teaching strategies affect
students' math performance. The research examines the domain of teaching strategies of college instructors
that significantly influence the mathematics performance of maritime students. The descriptive
correlational non-experimental design was employed, and the study involved 100 maritime students
enrolled in Math 1 during the 2021-2022 academic year, selected via random sampling. Student perceptions
were collected using a standardized questionnaire to gain data on instructional practices. Academic grades
were used to evaluate mathematics performance. The data was analysed using statistical methods such as
mean calculations, Pearson correlation coefficients, and linear regression to assess the importance of
correlations between variables. Results revealed that the teaching strategies of college instructors in
teaching mathematics as perceived by the maritime students were very high. Also, the findings revealed
that teaching strategies and mathematics performance of maritime students have no significant
relationship. Although it may appear unexpected that there is no direct correlation between teaching
strategies and mathematics performance, the role of affective strategies underscores the need to cultivate a
pleasant emotional environment in maritime education. The implementation of strategies that target the
enhancement of student motivation, engagement, and emotional well-being has been identified as crucial
in the improvement of mathematics performance in the face of the difficulties associated with online
learning. Based on the aforementioned findings, it is recommended that educators and institutions give
precedence to the advancement and execution of affective teaching methodologies specifically designed to
cater to the requirements of maritime students. Furthermore, it is necessary to conduct additional research
to investigate the effectiveness of particular instructional interventions and student support systems in
maximizing academic achievements in the context of online maritime education.
1.0 Introduction.
The concept of the new normal, which was formerly unusual, has now become the norm in nearly all schools
and institutions where lessons are predominantly conducted online. Currently, the current phase in education is
characterized by significant challenges and key moments, primarily attributed to the unforeseen global crisis.
The COVID-19 epidemic has significantly affected individuals, notably in the field of education, where the
conventional method of in-person instruction is disallowed. Online learning is significantly transforming the
maritime education sector in the country because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which poses a hazard to
all individuals. Within the realm of maritime education, this learning delivery strategy is considered
groundbreaking. The mathematical idea of maritime is distinct from regular computing since many maritime
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
students are unable to compute while performing something. To understand concepts, relationships between
ideas, and relationships between concepts and different subjects, students need problem-solving skills.
Moreover, Germany's lockdown schools closed in March 2020 and only partially reopened in May because of the
COVID-19 pandemic. Teachers were faced with the challenge of adapting to online learning (König et al., 2020).
In most parts of the world, schools and universities closed because of this proclamation, necessitating the
necessity for remote learning. According to UNESCO (2020), the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a lack of
education for over 1.5 billion students, which accounts for 90 percent of the global population of registered
learners. In light of these worldwide difficulties, the purpose of this study is to provide insights into the
effectiveness of teaching strategies and the mathematics performance of maritime students in the context of the
new normal in education. In addition, research conducted in the United States has reported on the influence that
teaching and learning had during the pandemic (Hamilton et al, 2020) and (Reich et al, 2020) conducted
interviews with forty educators from all throughout the United States. Describe their professional experiences
during the pandemic when they were working in a variety of educational sectors during the year 2020. The
research findings unveiled three key challenges encountered by educators: difficulties in effectively involving
students, burnout and erosion of professional identities among instructors, and the exacerbation of disparities
among students with special needs or those from underprivileged districts.
The education sector in the Philippines has experienced significant impacts as a result of the ongoing pandemic.
In research conducted by Tria (2020), various new normal scenarios were identified in the educational
environment. Nevertheless, certain obstacles and issues arose while proposing various techniques to adapt to
the new normal. Consequently, educational institutions at every level must confront these challenges and
meticulously assess strategies and protocols for executing the new standard. In the current challenging
circumstances, collaboration emerges as a key factor. It is imperative to contribute to the establishment of post-
COVID-19 education, adapting to the emerging paradigm. In the new normal, teaching and learning
mathematics is extremely difficult. There will be doubts, concerns, and anxieties. Erroneous beliefs may arise,
along with a disdain for the topic or the instructor. Students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which
are the main objectives of K–12 arithmetic, may not be effectively developed by math teachers (The Philippine
Star, 2020). The myth that math is the most difficult subject to learn should be debunked. The basis for teaching
and learning arithmetic at the elementary school level must be solid. Its real-world applications should be
practical and useful. Even in the new normal, such efforts should begin with math professors themselves, so that
students will begin or continue to enjoy and enjoy learning the subject. Based on the objective of this study it
provides insights into effective approaches for teaching and learning mathematics in the new normal, ultimately
contributing to the improvement of mathematics education in the Philippines. According to Villegas (2021),
there were pre-pandemic warning signs of an education crisis in the Philippines. The 2018 assessment conducted
by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD Program) for International Student
Assessment (PISA) garnered significant attention due to its findings. The assessment revealed that Filipino
students exhibited the lowest performance among 79 countries in the subjects of mathematics, science, and
reading. The math and science scores of Filipino 15-year-old children were 353 and 357 points, respectively,
which is lower than the average score of 489 in both categories among OECD countries. It is realistic to predict
that the public health situation resulting from the ongoing pandemic will increase Filipino pupils' low
performance. Many lockdowns have resulted in no face-to-face interaction under the new normal, forcing
students to rely on learning resources to finish their education. As a result, there is a learning crisis, with low-
quality content in modules and distance-learning resources.
A school in Davao del Sur reported that teachers have difficulties when using the online-blended learning
strategy as they adapt to the new teaching paradigm. Educational institutions continue to have difficulties in
adequately addressing the deficiencies in resources and capabilities for both educators and learners as they
adapt to the transformative changes in pedagogical approaches. Contemporary educational initiatives aim to
cultivate teachers' proficiency in various pedagogical approaches, particularly in adapting to the evolving
landscape of education. This is to provide insights into overcoming challenges and improving the effectiveness
of online-blended learning in Davao del Sur schools, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of pedagogical
delivery in the new normal.
79
With the literature presented on the teaching strategies and mathematics performance of maritime students, the
researcher feels that there is a need for better and more effective teaching strategies. Schools are formed with the
purpose of imparting knowledge and skills to their students, with the ultimate goal of improving academic
performance. This study will also help to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the students in
mathematics. In addition, this will be the backbone of the department to improve the performance of the
students and it seeks to identify areas for improvement and inform the development of strategies aimed at
enhancing the academic performance of maritime students in Davao City maritime schools.
2.0 Methodology
2.1 Research Design
This study used a quantitative research design utilizing a descriptive-correlational non-experimental research
design. The data was subjected to statistical analysis to examine the relationship between teaching strategies and
mathematics performance and ascertain their relevance. The perceived success of teaching strategies was using
descriptive statistics, which included mean calculations. To evaluate the magnitude and level between teaching
strategies and mathematics performance, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated. According to Kirch
(2008), The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) is a statistical measure used to quantify the degree of linear
relationship between two variables. The proposed study employs a correlational research design method to
examine the relationship between teaching practices and the mathematics performance of maritime
students. Furthermore, the researcher performed linear regression analysis to ascertain the particular teaching
strategies that had a substantial impact on mathematics performance.
Also, the researcher used the class record to get the scores of the respondents. For the independent variable,
which is the mathematics performance, the researcher used their final grade in Math 1, which indicates their
performance in written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessment scores based on their class record
with the help of the School Registrar.
80
2.5 Ethical Consideration
The researcher assured that the Research Ethics Committee adhered to the nine components of ethical
considerations. The aforementioned factors encompass societal value, informed consent, risks and rewards,
safety considerations, privacy and confidentiality of information, principles of justice, transparency, researcher
qualifications, appropriateness of facilities, and community involvement.
Table 1. Summary of the level of teaching strategies of college instructors in teaching mathematics
TEACHING STRATEGIES MEAN DESCRIPTION
Behavioral Strategies 4.27 Very High
Cognitive Strategies 4.36 Very High
Affective Strategies 4.40 Very High
The mean scores indicate consistently positive ratings with an overall mean score of 4.34 or very high levels of
teaching strategies of college instructors in teaching mathematics (Table 1). This further implies that the teacher's
strategy is always manifested in the new normal. All indicators under the teaching strategies of college
instructors have a verbal description of very high. Consequently, the college educators implemented affective
techniques in response to the current circumstances, encompassing learning strategies aimed at effectively
managing emotions, encompassing both positive and negative states.
The correlation between affective strategies and learning remains ambiguous; nevertheless, a favorable
emotional environment often enhances the process of learning. The respondents perceived that the affective
strategy has the highest mean. Based on the data given, the affective strategies get a mean of 4.40, or very high.
This means that the teacher's affective approach is always observed in the new normal. This further implies that
teachers show a very high level of effective teaching strategies in teaching college mathematics. A cognitive
strategy is the second-highest indicator with a mean score of 4.36 or very high. In teaching college mathematics,
instructors have a high level of teaching strategies in terms of cognitive strategies. This further implies that the
teacher's cognitive strategy is always manifested in the new normal.
This finding supports the notion proposed by Pishghadam (2012) that the affective domain is a significant
indication for enhancing quality of life. Therefore, it is recommended that instructional efforts prioritize the
affective domain. British Council (2020) also justifies this strategy during the pandemic, that in the classroom,
teachers can play an active role in the development and use of emotional strategies by creating a generally
positive atmosphere in the classroom. This can be done by encouraging and counseling learners, identifying
achievable goals, and working towards autonomous learning through personal activities and pair and group
work. The findings of Costley's (2020) study indicate that the use of cognitive methods moderates the link in
question. This exemplifies the efficacy of employing cognitive techniques in addressing ambiguous instruction,
thereby leading to enhanced levels of student learning.
In addition, ScholarChip (2020) mentioned that daily, teachers must strike a delicate balance in the classroom. In
addition to teaching, grading, supporting students, and doing administrative responsibilities, teachers must also
handle student conduct. Classrooms can become unruly and chaotic if proper behavior management is not
taken into account. This results in an environment that is unsuitable for learning or academic performance. And,
Sharp (2021) stated that in the new normal views, students’ behavior and attitude have an impact on their
learning. It supports the influence of new normal classes and learning perspective development while also
contributing to self-determination in the new normal classes and framework theory of learning engagement.
Lastly, Open Colleges (n.d.) mentioned in her article that there are pros to online learning but also comes with
its unique challenges. Teachers and Instructors need to be the primary force driving this change and promoting
engagement. Amidst the epidemic, universities need to understand and recognize the ramifications of this
phenomenon on teaching, learning, student experience, infrastructure, operation, and people in the medium and
long term. As stated by Dayagbil et al. (2021), it is imperative to employ scenario analysis and possess a
81
comprehensive awareness of the unique environment of each university in order to effectively tackle the existing
difficulties they encounter.
Table 2. Level of teaching strategies of college instructors in teaching mathematics in terms of affective strategies
INDICATORS MEAN DESCRIPTION
My Instructor…
1. Allows students to have more clarifications and explanations on a certain 4.47 Very High
stimulus.
2. Supports students' sympathy towards others. 4.38 Very High
3. Helps students have confidence in themselves. 4.42 Very High
4. Encourages students to interact positively amongst themselves. 4.40 Very High
5. Teach students the way to identify their points of strength and weakness. 4.41 Very High
6. Makes students take part in different roles in the teaching–learning 4.38 Very High
situation.
7. Let students have their conversations positively. 4.37 Very High
8. Teach students how to change their negative reactions into positive ones. 4.29 Very High
9. Trains students to solve their problems comfortably. 4.43 Very High
10. Strengthens leadership in his students. 4.46 Very High
Overall Mean 4.40 Very High
Table 2 displays college instructors' impactful math teaching strategies. Of the three indications of college
instructors' teaching strategies, respondents rated affective strategies the highest, with a mean score of 4.40 or
very high. This suggests that the new normal always reflects the teacher's emotive approach. With a mean score
of 4.47, respondents scored the first item as the highest, saying the instructor “Allows students to have more
clarifications and explanations on a certain stimulus”. This means that instructors always allow students to get
further clarification on a math issue in the new normal. As stated in the British Council (2020), that the instructor
can promote affective methods by creating a favorable classroom environment. Let students ask clarifying
questions to eliminate negative variables and develop positive ones. However, item eight, which stated that the
instructor "Teaches students how to change their negative reactions into positive ones," was rated the lowest with a
mean score of 4.29 and was also described as very high. This implies that the teacher always instructs students
on how to turn negative responses into positive ones. In line with the result, Garay (2012) stated that Affective
learning strategies control happy and negative emotions. While the relationship between affective methods and
learning is uncertain, a favorable affective environment improves learning. Emotional variables affect learning.
They can be good or bad. Second language acquisition models emphasize negative affective components or
affective filters.
Table 3. Level of teaching strategies of college instructors in teaching mathematics in terms of cognitive strategies
INDICATORS MEAN DESCRIPTION
My Instructor…
1. Begins with presenting the main ideas of the topic at the beginning of the class. 4.49 Very High
2. Encourages students to verify information and facts before giving judgments. 4.48 Very High
3. Begin the teaching–learning situation by presenting a problem to students. 4.36 Very High
4. Guides students to references such as dictionaries, encyclopedias, internet sites, …etc. 4.26 Very High
5. Uses cognitive teaching strategies to harmonize with students' learning strategies. 4.27 Very High
6. Encourages students to generate as many alternatives as they can for the problem 4.29 Very High
discussed.
7. Facilitates for students to make use of the procedures that organize memory potentials 4.25 Very High
(symbolizing information)
8. Gives students enough time to question and investigate the desirable objective. 4.41 Very High
9. Allows the students to generate new information by making comparisons between their 4.35 Very High
previous knowledge and new one.
10. Begins with examples up to the concept in the teaching–learning situation. 4.40 Very High
Overall Mean 4.36 Very High
Table 3 presents the data pertaining to the cognitive methods employed by the respondents. This indicator ranks
second in terms of verbal description, with all items receiving very high ratings. College instructors employ a
significantly high level of cognitive strategy in mathematics instruction, as indicated by the indicator's mean
value of 4.36. This further implies that the instructor’s cognitive strategy is always observed in the new normal.
The first item stating that college instructors “Begin with presenting the main ideas of the topic at the beginning of the
82
class” obtained the highest mean of 4.49, described as very high. This implies that at the beginning of the lesson,
teachers always introduce the main concept of the topic in this new normal.
According to Anderson (2011), the cognitive domain includes expertise, comprehension, application, analysis,
synthesis, and evaluation. The learner's ability to analyze records is knowledge. Comprehension tests the
learner's capacity to recognize knowledge's means. Students can explain an idea in their own words. Better to
present the lesson's primary topic before addressing it. On the other hand, the lowest item in this indicator with
a mean score of 4.25 but still a very high verbal description is item seven, in which the instructor “Facilitates their
students to make use of the procedures that organizes memory potentials”. This implies that college teachers always
guide their students in the new normal by using processes that arrange cognitive potentials such as symbolizing
information.
Based on the results, Costley (2020) suggested using cognitive methods to clarify instruction and improve
student learning. Repetition, organizing new language, summarizing, context guessing, and imagery-based
memorization are examples. All of these tactics use language manipulation to increase learning. Online learning
performance is affected by student motivation and cognitive load. Students who can regulate their learning in
difficult settings surpass those who can't. Cognitive methods improve cognitive processing and help students
handle challenging teaching situations.
Table 4. Level of teaching strategies of college instructors in teaching mathematics in terms of behavioral strategies
INDICATORS MEAN DESCRIPTION
My Instructor…
1. Provide the student with information regarding his answer’s accuracy all the time. 4.37 Very High
2. Use specific questions to have specific answers. 4.39 Very High
3. Uses direct presentation to provide students with information. 4.42 Very High
4. Eliminates any undesirable stimuli after the student does correct behavior. 4.11 High
5. Trains his students on distinguishing between characteristics of the same concept. 4.36 Very High
6. Cares about rectifying students’ undesired behaviors. 4.24 Very High
7. Dissembles the teaching–learning material into specific tasks that need specific 4.19 High
responses.
8. Helps his students imitate desired models. 4.28 Very High
9. Give awards to students for their right answers. 4.26 Very High
10. Neglects undesired behaviors in the teaching–learning situations. 4.04 High
Overall Mean 4.27 Very High
Table 4 shows the behavioral strategies were rated as the least indicator among the others with a total mean
score of 4.27 or very high, which means that the college instructor’s behavioral strategy is very high in teaching
mathematics. This further implies that the teacher’s behavioral strategy is always manifested in the new normal.
The second item in which teachers use specific questions to have a specific answer was rated as the highest with
a means core of 4.42 and described as very high. This further implies that in the new normal, their college
instructors “Use the direct presentation to provide students with information”. Research related to behavioral
approaches This inquiry aims to elucidate the importance of employing behavioral strategies by both trainers
and learners in order to appreciate and analyze the fundamental aspects of improving, structuring, and
recognizing preferred behaviors, as well as the methods of comparing outcomes.
Direct instruction is one of the best teaching methods, according to Renard (2019). Direct instruction, often
misunderstood, outperforms other methods. Direct instruction uses lectures or demonstrations to teach new
topics. Teachers now teach directly when suitable for the skill being taught. Example: The step-by-step problem-
solving procedure is best learned directly, whereas demonstrating how to is more engaging and hands-on. On
the other hand, the lowest was the tenth item stating that their instructor “Neglects undesired behaviors in the
teaching-learning situations”, with a mean score of 4.04 described as high. Although this statement had the lowest
mean it is still described as high. This implies that teachers often ignore undesirable behavior in the new normal
during teaching-learning circumstances.
Sharp (2021) believed that behavioral strategies were powerful strategies or precisely directed behaviors that
could be evaluated and observed. Such tactics aim to rectify bad habits and teach good ones. According to the
83
new normal, students' conduct and attitudes affect learning. It supports new normal classrooms, learning
perspectives, self-determination, and the framework theory of learning engagement.
According to the statistics provided in Table 5, the mathematics performance of maritime students is
characterized by a mean score of 1.68, indicating a satisfactory level of achievement. This implies that the group
of participants satisfies the minimum level of proficiency, as evidenced by their score above the average. This
further implies that students have a very satisfactory academic performance in mathematics.
Based on Montondo (2020), the evolving impact of mathematics on our daily lives necessitates a more thorough
reconsideration of mathematics education. The skills required to design and construct a secure vehicle vary
significantly from those necessary to operate the same vehicle safely. Similarly, we need to differentiate between
the minority, who are the target audience for numerous mathematical curricula, and the majority, who must be
knowledgeable users of mathematics without necessarily comprehending all of it.
This research shows how good mathematics teaching and learning approaches can help teachers, school leaders,
and policymakers solve current and future difficulties. Students with poor learning autonomy are likely to have
inferior mathematical aptitude, according to Bringula et al. (2021). Students who doubt their math skills do
worse. Students say asynchronous session activities including reading, assignments, practice exercises, and
quizzes are difficult to assess, teach, and consult. Problems like this explain test anxiety in students. These
problems caused uncertainty or low-grade perceptions. The quantitative data suggest that children should be
gradually introduced to learner autonomy to improve their math ability.
Table 6. Correlation analysis between teaching strategies and mathematics performance of maritime students in the new normal
R P-VALUE DECISION ON HO INTERPRETATION
TEACHING
There is no significant
STRATEGIES 0.093 0.359 Failed to Reject
correlation
The findings shown in Table 6 demonstrate that there exists a positive association between teaching strategies
and the mathematical performance of maritime students in the context of the new normal. However, it is
important to note that this correlation is not statistically significant. The correlation coefficient (r value) in the
table is 0.093, indicating a minimal positive link between the degree of teaching strategies and the mathematics
performance of marine students in the current learning environment. Moreover, the r-value is close to zero,
which pertains to no correlation. This implies that teaching strategies and mathematics performance have almost
no relationship. Given that the p-value of 0.359 exceeds the predetermined alpha threshold of significance of
0.05, it may be concluded that the observed association lacks statistical significance. There is no substantial
correlation between instructional methods and the mathematical achievement of marine students in the current
circumstances. It can be concluded that the null hypothesis has not been rejected. The data imply that in the new
normal, the instructor's teaching strategies and the mathematics performance of maritime students are not
significantly related at all.
This further means that teaching strategies are not a factor in maritime students' academic performance in
learning college mathematics. The teaching approaches of the college instructors of a particular maritime school
do not significantly contribute to their maritime students' learning or academic performance in learning
mathematics. Despite the long-standing existence of online learning, a significant number of faculty members
and students fail to recognize the inherent benefits associated with totally online learning. During the ongoing
health crisis, numerous educators have been compelled to devise expedient online learning strategies (Hodges et
al., 2020). While online approaches have proven to be efficient in providing knowledge, their effectiveness in
promoting active learning and fostering engagement is limited.
84
Table 7. Test of significance on the influence of teaching strategies on mathematics performance
UNSTANDARDIZED STANDARDIZED
TEACHING STRATEGIES COEFFICIENTS COEFFICIENTS
(TS)
B SE Beta t Sig. Decision on Ho Interpretation
(Constant) 1.892 0.206 9.164 0.000
Behavioral Strategies (BS) 0.004 0.013 0.085 0.305 0.761 Failed to Reject Not Significant
Cognitive Strategies (CS) 0.023 0.017 0.498 1.347 0.181 Failed to Reject Not Significant
Affective Strategies (AS) -0.031 0.014 -0.685 -2.296 0.024 Reject Significant
R = 0.237; R2 = .056; F-value = 1.912; p-value = 0.048
The results show (see table Table 7) that the teaching strategies of maritime college instructors as regards
affective strategies (B, 0.031; p<0.05) significantly predict the mathematics academic performance of maritime
students at a 0.05 level of significance. The results further show that for every unit increase in the teaching
strategies of maritime college instructors as regards to affective strategies, the academic performance of students
in mathematics would significantly increase by -0.031 as represented in the Regression Model: TS = 1.892 -0.031
(AS) at a 0.05 level of significance (F, 1.912; p<0.05). A coefficient with a negative sign indicates that there is a
tendency for the dependent variable to drop as the independent variable increases. The coefficient value
represents the extent to which the average of the dependent variable is altered when the independent variable is
shifted by one unit while keeping all other variables in the model the same. This implies that the null hypothesis
will be rejected and the affective strategies are statistically significant. Furthermore, using Linear Regression
Analysis, the data results from Table 4 revealed an F-value of 1.912 and a p-value of 0.048, which means that the
data fit the model. Also, the model summary showed an R-square, which suggests that the model explains 5.6
percent of the variation in the dependent variable; Mathematics Performance can be explained by the variation
in the independent variables; Behavioral, Cognitive, and Affective Strategies. Additional factors not included in
the model account for the remaining 94.4 percent. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the regression model
explains a maximum of 1.912 (R2, 0.056; p 0.05) of the variations or fluctuations in the academic achievement of
maritime students in mathematics, with a significance level of 0.05.
4.0 Conclusion
The findings of this study shed light on several key aspects of maritime education in the context of the new
normal, particularly regarding teaching strategies and mathematics performance. While the study identified
very high levels of teaching strategies among college instructors, it's crucial to interpret these findings within the
broader landscape of online education and maritime studies. These findings underline the need for educators to
analyze and refine teaching strategies to meet online learning obstacles. Professional development in online
pedagogy and technology-enhanced teaching can improve education and student engagement. Additionally,
policymakers can help educators and students transition to online learning. Infrastructure, technology, and
professional development can help maritime students embrace remote teaching and learning best strategies,
enhancing educational outcomes. Future researchers could explore additional factors influencing mathematics
performance among maritime students, such as socio-economic background, access to technology, and student
motivation. Longitudinal studies tracking student progress over time can provide deeper insights into the
sustained impact of teaching strategies on academic achievement. Lastly, comparative research across maritime
institutions and locations can also reveal the efficacy of different teaching strategies and uncover maritime
online education best practices.
6.0 Funding
This work received no specific grant from any funding agency.
85
8.0 Acknowledgment
The author extends his gratitude to the following who have shared their means and skills towards the
accomplishment of this study.
9.0 References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a
revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). Longman.
Open Colleges. (n.d.). Learning strategies for the new normal.
https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/blogs/articles/learning-strategies-for-the-new-normal
Bringula, R., Reguyal, J. J., Tan, D. D., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an
online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5
British Council (2020). Affective Strategies. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/affective-strategies
Costley, J. (2020). Using cognitive strategies overcomes cognitive load in online learning environments.
Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2019-
0053
Garay, U., & Etxebarria, A. (2012). Combining affective strategies and the internet for learning second languages.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Combining-affective-strategies-and-the-internet-for-Garay-
Etxebarria/e1638877fd52798bd18345313e2974bdbdf8fd93
Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021). Teaching and learning continuity amid
and beyond the pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692
Hamilton, L., Kaufman, J., & Diliberti, M. (2020). Teaching and leading through a pandemic: Key findings from
the american educator panels spring 2020 covid-19 surveys. RAND Corporation.
https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA168-2
Hamzeh, M. A. H. (2014). Teaching strategies used by mathematics teachers in the jordan public schools and
their relationship with some variables. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 331–340.
https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-6-1
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Trust T., Bond A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online
learning. Educause. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-
remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kirch, W. (2008). Encyclopedia of Public Health. https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-1-4020-
5614-7
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure:
Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European
Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947
Pishghadam, R. and Zabihi, R. (2012). Crossing the threshold of Iranian TEFL. Applied Research in English.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267856793_Crossing_the_threshold_of_Iranian_TEFL
Renard L. (2019). Direct instruction - A practical guide to effective teaching.
https://www.bookwidgets.com/blog/2019/03/direct-instruction-a-practical-guide-to-effective-
teaching
Reich, J., Buttimer, C. J., Coleman, D., Colwell, R. D., Faruqi, F., & Larke, L. R. (2020). What’s lost, what’s left,
what’s next: Lessons learned from the lived experiences of teachers during the 2020 novel coronavirus
pandemic [Preprint]. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/8exp9
ScholarChip (2020). 8 Student Behavior Management Strategies for In and Out of the Classroom.
https://www.scholarchip.com/student-behavior-management-strategies/
Sharp, E. A., Norman, M. K., Spagnoletti, C. L., & Miller, B. G. (2021). Optimizing synchronous online teaching
sessions: A guide to the “new normal” in medical education. Academic Pediatrics, 21(1), 11–15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.009
The Philippine Star (2020). Math teachers: Bracing for the new normal. https://www.philstar.com/other-
sections/letters-to-the-editor/2020/09/23/2044408/math-teachers-bracing-new-normal
86
Tria, J. Z. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic through the Lens of Education in the Philippines: The New Normal.
International Journal of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), ep2001.
https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/8311
UNESCO (2020). Covid-19 Education Response.
https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/globalcoalition
Villegas, B. (2021). Addressing the Philippine education crisis. Human Side of Economics.
https://www.bworldonline.com/addressing-the-philippine-education-crisis-2/
87