CEC Notes LO7 by Nillah
CEC Notes LO7 by Nillah
Explain the difference between survey completion rate and survey response
rate
.The completion rate for surveys refers to the percentage of participants who
fully complete a survey out of all those who were invited to participate. It is
calculated by dividing the number of completed surveys by the total number of
invitations sent out and multiplying by 100 to get a percentage.
.The survey completion rate is the percentage of survey participants who finish
the survey. It is the number of people who have completed an online survey
divided by the number of survey respondents who started.
The response rate can be defined as the percentage of those who were asked to
participate in a survey to those who actually finished the survey. It is the
number of people who have completed an online survey divided by the number
of people to whom the survey has been sent. It looks a lot like the completion
rate, but it is not.
Completion Rate:
The completion rate refers to the percentage of completed surveys out of the
total number of surveys that were started by respondents.
It considers only those respondents who have actually entered your survey and
completed the entire questionnaire.
Calculation: Completion Rate = (Number of Completed Surveys) / (Number of
Respondents Who Entered the Survey).
Example: If you had 250 respondents start the survey and 200 of them
completed it, the completion rate would be 80%1.
Incomplete Data: A low completion rate indicates that respondents are not
filling out all the required information. Certain questions may have lower
reliability due to smaller sample sizes.
Response Rate:
The response rate provides insight into the accuracy of collected data. It is the
percentage of people who completed your survey relative to the total sample
group.
Unlike completion rate, response rate considers the entire sample group,
including those who did not start the survey.
Why is it Important?
The major goal of the process of commissioning is to make sure that all project
elements are operating per capacity, proper usage, and requirements, and that it
helps meet the project owners’ expectations and needs.
Types of Commissioning
Re-Commissioning
Retro-Commissioning
Monitor-Based Commissioning
Monitor-based commissioning is a continuous and intuitive approach to
maintaining a project. With the use of new technologies and innovative
techniques, this type of commissioning enables commissioning providers to
explore the systems in real-time and target specific components of a project.
The main goal of monitor-based commissioning is to maximize energy use and
identify retrofits needed for a building or equipment.
The OPR is a critical document prepared jointly by the owner and the
commissioning team. It outlines the project goals, performance criteria, and
specific requirements that the facility must meet. The OPR serves as a roadmap
for the entire commissioning process1.
The BOD provides a detailed explanation of the design decisions made during
the project. It includes information on system configurations, equipment
selections, and design assumptions. The BOD ensures that the design aligns
with the project requirements1.
These comments document the review process during the design phase. They
capture any discrepancies, clarifications, or modifications needed to meet the
project goals. Design review comments help maintain consistency and accuracy
throughout the project1.
Commissioning Plan
Commissioning Specifications
Certification Documentation
Certification documents verify that the installed systems meet the specified
standards. They include test reports, equipment manuals, and compliance
certificates. Certification ensures that the facility operates as intended1.
During the construction phase, submittal review comments track the approval
process for equipment, materials, and shop drawings. They ensure that the
installed components align with the design and project requirements.
These reports document observations made during site visits. They capture any
issues, deviations, or adjustments needed during construction. Field observation
reports contribute to the quality assurance process
Technical specifications in the OPR and commissioning process must align with
these advancements
Legislation and market demand drive the measurement and reporting of facility
resource efficiency.
Certification programs like ENERGY STAR, LEED, and WELL require OPR
and commissioning documentation for verification and credits. As energy and
carbon reduction concerns grow, these requirements will continue to escalate
Digital systems facilitate this process, but their functionality, ease of use, and
accuracy vary. Careful analysis of reporting system capabilities is crucial1.
Waste Management
Proper disposal of construction debris, including rock chips, wood debris, and
other refuse.
Implement a PMIS tool (such as PMWeb) to create a digital form for the
environmental demobilization checklist.
Learnig outcome 8
Start by listing what you have. Take stock of your parks, facilities, and other
areas and what resides within them. Next, create lists of all your vehicles and
equipment. Consider breaking these lists out into categories that make sense to
your department. For example, parks, aquatics, facilities, fleet, and equipment
are good categories to get started.
Flesh out your assets by including any relevant information. This could include:
Serial numbers
Make/models
Original price
Date installed/acquired
Expected lifespan
Special features
Maintenance standards
Related inspections
During this step, take extra time to organize and review your documentation for
each asset. This could include manuals, past work orders, warranty information,
and other related documents. While documentation is available, note the tasks
necessary to maintain each asset properly. Doing so will help make the second
step even more straightforward.
Now that the assets are listed, it’s time to determine their associated tasks.
Identify and list specific routine maintenance tasks to achieve the maintenance
standard. Determine how frequently they get performed. If available, rely on
previous data to determine an approximate task time.
Categorize tasks in a way that makes sense to your agency. You could
categorize it as types of maintenance, such as inspections, preventative
maintenance, general maintenance, and repairs.
Or you could create categories based on how the maintenance team operates.
For example:
Facility Maintenance
Landscape Maintenance
Turf Management
Playground Maintenance
Vehicle Maintenance
When you have tasks categorized appropriately, it will help make the next step
easier.
Once all the tasks are defined and categorized, it’s time to determine who will
do them. Delegating tasks depends on how the maintenance team works. For
example, some agencies assign staff to different segments like parks or
facilities. Other agencies may have a crew responsible for certain assets.
Of course, smaller agencies may rely on the same staff to take care of most
tasks.
The future is unpredictable. Assign tasks as best you can. If you’re not
assigning tasks to a specific person or date, consider designating a position and
week gets completed.
These first three steps make up the bulk of maintenance program creation.
However, some administrative “loose ends” need to be tied up to ensure the
program runs smoother. Let’s go over those next.
You may want to collaborate with those who help create the maintenance
team’s operating budget during this planning process. Then you could
determine if you have the budget and resources to complete the work outlined in
your maintenance plan.
The final step of this process leaves the door open for changes, amendments,
and, dare we say, improvements.
Evaluating the program with tangible data allows you to see inefficiencies and
the metaphorical cracks that some things always seem to fall through. Like your
other scheduled tasks, you should regularly set aside time to review the
maintenance program and make any tweaks.
The Takeaway
their job more efficiently while leaving room for evaluation and improvement.