Chapter 5 Lecture Example Solution
Chapter 5 Lecture Example Solution
1.1
Discount rate
Before tax cost of debt = 7% per annum
After tax cost of debt = (Before tax cost x 1 – tax rate)
= 5.04% (rounded to 5%) ()
TAX CALCULATION
R Million 0 1 2 3 4 5
Wear & Tear (R12m x 100%) (12) ()
Recoup. / Scrapping Allow. (-----)
(12) ----- ----- ----- -----
Tax at 28% 3.36
Tax Refund / (Paid) ----- 3.36
CASH FLOWS
R Million 0 1 2 3 4 5
Initial Cost (12) (½)
Residual -----
Tax (from Tax Calculation) 3.36 (½)
Total (12) ----- 3.36 ----- ----- -----
Discount rate = 5% NPV = (R8.95 Million) (using a financial calculator) ( If correct)
Discount rate = 5.04% NPV = (R8.95 Million) (using a financial calculator)
SCHEME B – LEASE
CASH FLOWS
R Million 0 1 2 3 4 6 5
Lease Payments () (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)
Residual -----
Tax (from Calculation) () 0.97 0.93 0.87 0.81 0.74
Total (3) (2.03) (2.07) (2.13) (2.19) 0.74
Discount rate = 5% NPV = (R9.40 Million) (using a financial calculator) ( if correct)
Discount rate = 5.04% NPV = (R9.39 Million) (using a financial calculator)
QUESTION 1 (CONTINUED) [25 marks]
1.2 Discuss the appropriateness of using Advanced Health’s cost of debt to Max
evaluate the financing decision. Marks
The decision to invest in the laser machine being financed will have
already been evaluated taking project specific risk into account. The
evaluation in 1.1 is being used to support the financing decision rather than ()
the investment decision.
Cash flows should be discounted at either WACC or the project specific
discount rate when evaluating the investment decision since the project
is financed using the company’s debt and equity resources. ()
However, the financing decision is a separate decision and the discount
rate should be tailored appropriately. ()
In the financing decision, we can use debt as the ‘base line’ and compare
other forms of finance to the cost of debt by using the cost of debt as the
discount rate. ()
The after-tax cost of debt is the opportunity cost of leasing and can be
used to discount the incremental cash flows arising from leasing as ()
compared to buying outright using this discount rate.
Any other relevant point. ()
(MAX = 4)
1.3 Evaluate the financial and non-financial factors that might affect Advanced Max
Health’s choice of financing between schemes A and B. Marks
Cost
As seen in 1.1, the borrow and buy scheme is cheaper than the lease on
the basis of the data provided.
This is largely due to the higher implied interest under the lease of 9%
versus 7% for the bank loan.
Wear and Tear allowances are also accelerated under the bank loan, Up to
with a 100% deduction available in year 1 rather than spread over the 5 year ()
period as in the lease. This may not be an issue, though, if the lessor can
also claim a 100% deduction in year one and builds this into the price of the
lease rental.
However, it is not clear whether the cost of debt quoted would apply in this
case. Indeed, Advanced Health may be able to negotiate a lower rate of
interest for a loan secured against an asset. The bank may also charge a
different rate for a fixed rate 5 year loan.
1.3 Evaluate the financial and non-financial factors that might affect Advanced Max
Health’s choice of financing between schemes A and B. Marks
Ease of arrangement
A bank loan secured against the asset could be costly and time
consuming to arrange as the bank assesses the value of the asset.
In this case, the vendor of the laser machine is offering a finance
package to make their product more attractive to potential purchasers. Up to
It may therefore be quicker and cheaper to arrange a lease than a ()
separate purchase agreement and bank loan in this instance.
Additional costs of the bank loan option should therefore be built into the
analysis.
Flexibility
Under the borrow and buy scheme , Advanced Health owns the equipment
outright and therefore has the flexibility to dispose of or upgrade the
equipment to reflect future changes and the needs of the business.
Such flexibility is unlikely to be provided under the lease arrangement. Up to
However, if the lease arrangement were to include the opportunity to ()
upgrade the equipment, a lease might prove to be more flexible than the
borrow and buy scheme.
Without knowing the details of the lease arrangement, it is not possible to
draw any firm conclusions on this issue.
Maintenance
It is not clear from the information whether the leasing company would be
responsible for the maintenance of the laser machine.
Given the level of lease rentals it is unlikely that maintenance costs fees
are included, however, it is possible that the leasing company might provide Up to
maintenance at an additional cost, which might be cheaper than Advanced ()
Health’s own cost.
However, the leasing company may not maintain the asset to the same
standard that Advanced Health would, therefore making the borrow and
buy scheme more attractive.
Equally it might be that Advanced Health would provide maintenance in both
situations and therefore this would not be a relevant consideration.