Block 1
Block 1
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY
COURSE COORDINATOR
Prof. Suhas Shetgovekar
Faculty, Discipline of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, IGNOU, New Delhi
General Editor
Prof. Suhas Shetgovekar
Faculty, Discipline of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, IGNOU, New Delhi
Acknowledgement
We acknowledge the help provided by Ms. Shivani Arora, Research Scholor, Ph.D. in Psychology in
editing process of this course material.
Unit 2 Role and Functions of Forensic Prof. Dipesh Chandra Nath (Adapted from Unit 4,
Psychologist Block 1 of BPCE021).
Unit 3 Assessment and Evaluation in Dr. Bibha Rani (Adapted from Unit 3, Bloc 3 of
Forensic Psychology BPCE021)
PRINT PRODUCTION
Mr. Rajiv Girdhar Mr. Heman Kumar Parida Secretarial Assistant
Assistant Registrar Section Officer Mr Suresh, Mr. Rampal Singh and
MPDD, IGNOU MPDD, IGNOU Mr. Naresh Kumar
June, 2022
Indira Gandhi National Open University, July 2022
ISBN:
All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other
means, without permission in writing from the Indira Gandhi National Open University.
Further Information on Indira Gandhi National Open University courses may be obtained from the
University’s office at MaidanGarhi, New Delhi-110068 or visit University website
http://www.ignou.ac.in.
Printed and published on behalf of the Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi by
Director, School of Social Sciences.
Cover page: Ms. Irene Khosla
Laser Composed by : Tessa Media & Computers, C-206, Shaheen Bagh, New Delhi-25
CONTENTS
Block/ Unit Title Page No.
BLOCK 1 FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION 11
Unit 1 Introduction to Forensic Psychology 13
Unit 2 Role and Functions of Forensic Psychologist 31
Unit 3 Assessment and Evaluation in Forensic Psychology 42
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Nature and Scope of Forensic Psychology
1.3 Sub-specialities in Forensic Psychology
1.4 Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology.
1.5 Let Us Sum Up
1.6 References
1.7 Key Words
1.8 Answers to Check Your Progress
1.9 Unit End Questions
1.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you will be able to,
1.1 INTRODUCTION
What comes to you mind when you come across the word “Forensic
Psychology”? May be the word forensic brings to your mind the X files and
crime related series or detective series and movies. Well, to some extent yes,
in these crime related series and movies, there are often individuals involved
who look at the crime or the possible criminal from a psychological
perspective. Though it can be said that forensic psychology is much more
scientific and deeper than what is shown in these series and movies (that are
based on crime and so on).
Forensic psychology can be explained as a branch of psychology and
involves systematic and scientific study of human behaviour in the context of
law, crime and so on.
1
Dr. S. L Vaya, Director and Additional Director, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Gujarat
Forensic Science University and Directorate of Forensic Sciences. Gandhinagar, Gujarat
(Adapted from Unit 3, Block 4 of BPCE021) and Prof. Dipesh Chandra Nath, Head of
Department of Applied Psychology, Calcutta University, Kolkatta (Adapted from Unit 1,
Block 1 of BPCE021)
15
Forensic Psychology: Let us try to have an idea about forensic psychology with the help of the
An Introduction
following conversation between Anjali and her friends.
Anjali returned home after a much busy day and was now on the way to meet
her school friends, John, Nafisa, Mahima, Garima, Manjit and Lily. It was
like an informal alumni meet and Anjali was looking forward to it. At the
restaurant, one by one all the friends arrived and started interacting with
each other. Let us look at their conversation.
John: Wow, its so nice to meet you all after so long. This was a much
awaited get-together.
Garima: Well, John we could have met earlier, if you did not have a busy
schedule as you do.
John: Well I work for an MNC and you know the pressure. And by the way
you were also in field. so its not my fault entirely that we could not meet.
Garima: Oh yes I was posted in Bangalore. It is just that now i got my leave.
Lily (Smiling): Better late than never.
All in unison: Thats true.
All were busy talking, but Anjali was a bit quiet.
Manjit (Jokingly): Hey guys, be careful about what you speak we have two
psychologists amongst us.
Mahima: Well, don't worry Manjit, Me and Anjali are not judging you And
besides, Anjali is not just a psychologist, she is a forensic psychologist.
Manjit: Wow. Sounds pretty complex.
Mahima: Well it is a very challenging field.
Lily: So Anjali, can you tell us more about this forensic psychology and how
it is different from what Mahima is doing. She is also a psychologist right?
Anjali: Well, forensic psychology is a field where psychology is applied to
the legal system.
Mahima: Lily, I have done my MA in psychology and later did my Ph. D in
psychology and now I am in to teaching. But Anjali after her graduation did
Masters of Science in Forensic Psychology and further trained in the field.
John: Wow, that is really commendable. But what exactly do you do. Do you
test DNA, collect fingerprints and other evidence? Are you like a detective?
Anjali(Laughing): No John of course not. As a forensic psychologist we
have various functions, like carrying out criminal investigation, analysis of
crime, profiling of offenders. We are also involved in detection of
malingering or deception, interviewing eyewitness and expert witness. We
also work in area of police psychology. We basically use the principles,
assessment and techniques from psychology and apply them to legal system.
20
This very issue is still at the heart of many legal battles today. It is interesting Introduction to
Forensic
to note that Hugo Munsterberg, who was another student of Wundt, opened a Psychology
clinic in 1892 with the goal of introducing psychology to the courtroom. He/
she was largely laughed at but continued championing his cause for many,
many years.
In the context of how forensic psychology can be related to clinical
psychology, we can also discuss about clinical-forensic psychology. Clinical
forensic psychology is the subfield that most people are familiar with, even
though they are not even aware of it. There are a variety of things to do with
this area. Just like a clinical psychologist, clinical-forensic psychologists are
mainly interested in assessing and treating people suffering from some form
of mental illness. The difference is that the people being treated are also
being assessed because they are somehow involved in the criminal justice
system, mainly because of conviction for some offence. Most people in the
subfield decide to make treatment and assessment the focus of their career in
life. Offenders can be forcibly treated while in prisons, corrections facilities,
as a requirement of parole/ probation, or in a hospital. Alternatively,
offenders could see a clinical-forensic psychologist who operates in private
practice.
Forensic psychology and cognitive psychology:Cognitive psychology is a
discipline within psychology that investigates the internal mental processes
of thought such as visual processing, memory, thinking, learning, feeling,
problem solving, and language.Cognitive psychologists use psychophysical
and experimental approaches to understand, diagnose and solve problems,
concerning themselves with the mental processes which mediate between
stimulus and response. Cognitive theory contends that solutions to problems
take the form of algorithms – rules that are not necessarily understood but
promise a solution, heuristics – rules that are understood but that do not
always guarantee solutions. In other instances, solutions may be found
through insight, a sudden awareness of relationships. Modern cognitive
psychology has been deeply influenced by the work of Noam Chomsky,
Albert Bandura, and Ulric Neisser.
Forensic psychology is tied closest to the cognitive perspective. The
cognitive perspective was developed by George Miller, Jerome Bruner, and
Ulrich Neisser throughout the 1990s. It focused on identifying the process of
thinking, language, and dreams, with the main idea that perceptions and
thoughts influence behaviour. Forensic psychologists not only offer their
expert opinion at trials, but can also be found helping a witness identifying a
murderer in a line of suspects. They sometimes hypnotiseindividuals to help
them remember things or interview potential. They could also help jury
members to eliminate those who may be biased. These tasks relate to the
cognitive activities of thinking, memory and perceptions. Other times, they
give their own expert testimony at trails which could result in an individual
being confined to a mental institution, receive huge monitory awards, obtain
custody of a child, or lose his or her life. Legal psychologists play a big role
in the justice system.
21
Forensic Psychology: Forensic psychologists often work within the judicial system in such diverse
An Introduction
areas as determining an inmate’s readiness for parole; evaluation of
rehabilitation programmes; clinical competency; tort liability and damages;
evidence; jury selection; and police training. The evaluations of the mental
state of individuals also communicate the cognitive perspective. They may
also be employed in other areas of jurisprudence, including patent and
trademark disputes, divorce and custody cases, product liability, and taxation.
Psychologists advise their clients in several ways, including diagnostic
appraisals, which may determine the capability of the client to stand trial.
They are also called to provide clinically- based opinions on a wide variety of
issues arising from their diagnoses. Sometimes they obtain hospital records,
police reports, witness statements, and provide relevant research. Beside
submitting these and other findings, they are often required to testify in court.
Forensic psychologist may be hired by a defence attorney to evaluate the
defendant’s mental processes. They administer personality and intelligence
tests after being briefed on the circumstances of the crime and examining
records detailing the mental or emotional problems and treatment. Forensic
psychology can also be tied to ideas of structuralism. That is, structure of
conscious experience (such as witnessing a crime); objective sensation –
seeing, touching, testing, hearing and subjective feelings like memories and
thoughts.
Forensic psychologists determine whether or not people are telling the truth
with the use of polygraph machines (lie detector). The machine records a
person’s physical response to questions. The lie detector measures blood
pressure, breathing, electrical conductivity of the skin, pulse and perspiration
in order to tell if a person is lying or not. This aspect of forensics especially
ties back to the cognitive perspective and conscious thoughts. If the enquired
party does not provide accurate answers, then their body’s reaction gives
them away.
Forensic psychology is most directly related to the cognitive perspective
because most of this profession deals with mentality, memories and
conscious thoughts. Psychologists assess witnesses and suspects for accuracy
in objective thoughts and help enhance memories to uncover the truth and put
away the bad guys.
Forensic psychology and developmental psychology: Developmental
psychology, also known a human development, is the scientific study of
systematic psychological changes that occur in human beings over the course
of their life span. Originally concerned with infants and children, the field has
expanded to include adolescence, adult development, ageing and the entire
life span. This field examines change across a broad range of topics including
motor skills and other psycho-physiological processes; cognitive
development involving areas such as problem solving, moral understanding,
and conceptual understanding; language acquisition; social, personality, and
emotional development; and self-concept and identity formation.
24
1.3 SUB-SPECIALITIES IN FORENSIC Introduction to
Forensic
PSYCHOLOGY2 Psychology
2
Section 1.3 is authored by Prof. Suhas Shetgovekar, Faculty, Discipline of Psychology,
SOSS, IGNOU, Delhi
25
Forensic Psychology: system. Legal psychologists often advice judges and individuals from legal
An Introduction
system in making decisions. Eyewitness assessment, that will be covered in
unit 9, can be categorised under legal psychology. To differentiate between
forensic psychology and legal psychology, forensic psychology mainly
focuses on the criminal or the offender and legal psychology focuses on the
through process of the judges, legal process, legal system and so on.
Correctional psychology: The last sub-speciality of forensic psychology
that we will discuss is correctional psychology. The focus of correctional
psychology, as the name suggests, is on treatment and management of the
criminals or offenders. Thus, the concepts and principles of psychology are
applied for correctional purposes. Correctional psychology would include
topics related to the prison and prison set up and also interventions for the
inmates and offenders. Correctional psychology will be discussed in unit 10
of this course.
1.6 REFERENCES
American Psychological Association. (2011). Speciality Guidelines for
Forensic Psychology. American Psychology- Law Association. Retrieved on
28 7/04/2022 https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/forensic-psychology.
Bartol, C.R. and Bartol, A.M. (2008). Introduction to Forensic Psychology. Introduction to
Forensic
Research and Application. (2nd edition). Barnes & Nobles, NY. Psychology
Canter, D. (2017). Criminal Psychology. New York: Routledge.
Harmening, W and Gamez, A. M. (2016). Forensic Psychology. Delhi:
Pearson.
Huss, M. T. (2014). Forensic Psychology: Research, Clinical Practices and
Applications. USA: Wiley.
Polizzi, D and Draper, M. R. (2016). Forensic Psychology Reconsidered: A
Critique of Mental Illness and the Courts. New York: Routledge.
Shipley, A.L and Arrigo, B. A. (2012). Introduction to Forensic Psychology:
Court, Law Enforcement and Correctional Practices. New York: Elsevier.
Veeraraghavan, Vimala (2009). Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Select
Scientific Publishers, New Delhi.
Walker, L., & Shapiro, D. (2004). Introduction to forensic psychology.
Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.
30
UNIT 2 ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF Role and Functions
of Forensic
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST1 Psychologist
Structure
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Forensic Psychologist’s Roles and Functions
2.3 Qualifications and Training
2.4 Let Us Sum Up
2.5 References
2.6 Answers to Check Your Progress
2.7 Unit End Questions
2.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you will be able to,
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The work of a forensic psychologist is varied and wide reaching. He/ she
assists the police in investigation, provides advice on interviewing of
suspects or witnesses, works as expert witness in court cases, works in the
rehabilitation of offenders, conducts forensic psychology research or work in
academia. This unit aims to present a balanced view of profession of the
forensic psychologist and to introduce you to the variety of roles within
which the forensic psychologist can, and does work. You will also be
introduced to the specific functions that a forensic psychologist performs
within these roles.
1
Prof. Dipesh Chandra Nath, Head, Department of Applied Psychology, Calcutta University,
Kolkatta (adapted from Uni t4, Block 1 of BPCE021).
31
Forensic Psychology: The four roles are:
An Introduction
Clinical: In this role the forensic psychologist will usually be involved in the
assessment of an individual in order to provide a clinical judgement. The
psychologist could use interviews, assessment tools or psychometric tests
(i.e. special questionnaires) to aid in his or her assessment. These
assessments can inform the police, the courts, or the prison and probation
services about the psychological functioning of an individual and can
therefore influence how the different sections of the criminal justice system
process the individual in question. For example, a forensic psychologist may
be asked to assess individuals in order to determine whether they are fit to
stand trial or whether they have a mental illness which means that they would
not understand the proceedings.
Experimental: This may involve the forensic psychologist performing
research regarding the case. This can involve carrying out experimental tests
in order to illustrate a point or provide further information to the courts (for
example, how likely it is that someone can correctly identify an object in the
hand of an individual from a distance of 100 metres at twilight). Alternatively
it can involve psychologists providing the court with a summary of current
research findings which may be relevant to the case in question.
Actuarial: In this context the word ‘actuarial’ relates to the use of statistics
in order to inform a case. One example of how a forensic psychologist may
act in an actuarial role is if they are required to present actuarial information
relating to the probability of an event occurring to the court. For example, a
court may wish to know how likely an offender is to reoffend before the
sentence is decided. In such a case, a forensic psychologist could be called
upon in order to inform the pre-sentence report to the court.
Advisory: In this role the forensic psychologist may provide advice to the
police about how to proceed with an investigation. For example, an
offender’s profile could inform the investigation, or advice could be provided
about how best to interview a particular suspect. Alternatively a prosecution
or defence lawyer may ask for advice on how best to cross examine a
vulnerable witness or another expert witness. This role involves the use of the
psychologist’s expertise in order to advice the police, courts or prison and
probation services.
As you can see, psychology thus can be used in a variety of different
scenarios within the criminal justice system and for a number of different
reasons. The next few sub-sections will examine in more detail how
psychologists can and do contribute their expertise to aid the work of the
criminal justice system. This list of role, however, does not claim to be
exhaustive, as there are many more ways in which psychologists play their
part. We have therefore chosen the most well known roles in order to give an
indication of what kinds of roles and functions forensic psychology involves.
Let us now discuss the functions of a forensic psychologist.
Criminal investigations: The role of a forensic psychologist in criminal
investigations can take a variety of forms. Professor Laurence Alison of the
32
University of Liverpool has suggested a number of ways in which the Role and Functions
of Forensic
expertise of a psychologist could aid the police and support the work that Psychologist
they do. According to him, “It is important to appreciate that the ways in
which psychologists can contribute extends well beyond the process of
profiling offenders. Indeed the apprehension of the offender would be
assisted by enhancing police decision-making and leadership-skills,
improving methods of interviewing witnesses and victims, developing
accurate methods of recording, collating and analysing data on pre-
convictions of offenders, developing suspect prioritisation system based on
empirical research and enhancing intelligence-led policing and the use of
informations.” (Alison 2005)
From the list of functions within the quote above, it may be seen that the role
of the psychologist in assisting the police can be wide-ranging.
Crime analysis: Crime analysis (sometimes also called intelligence analysis)
is one field of work which draws upon forensic psychological methods.
Crime analysts are generally employed by the police (or policing agencies,
for example in the UK, the National Crime and Operations Faculty and the
National Crime Squad) in order to analyse crime data to aid the police
carryout their roles. One of the most common roles of crime analysts is that
of case linkage. This process involves the linkage of crime based on the
similarities in the behaviours of the offenders as reported by the victim or as
inferred from the crime scene. For example, let us examine a rape case
committed by a stranger on a woman walking home alone after a night out
with her friends. Crime analysts could use the details of this case – the fact
that she had just left her office, that the rapist took some of her clothing away
from the scene with him, the contents of the threats used towards the woman
– in order to check against an already established database of similar crimes
to see whether there are any similarities to past crimes. If matches are found
– the same threats were used, similar items of clothing taken by a rapist, and
it was in a close geographical location to another rape – then this information
can be used by the police to investigate the potential that the same individual
offender has committed both crimes. This allows the focusing of the
resources of the investigation in order to avoid duplication of work.
Offenders profiling or criminal investigative analysis: Offender profiling
has received a great deal of attention from the media in recent years. Media
reporting of the utilisation of forensic psychologists in high profile cases has
introduced the general public to the notion of offender profiling. While this
has raised the profile of the field, it could be argued that the (largely)
sensationalist portrayal of profiling resulted in a general confusion of what
profiling actually is, how often it is done and who does it. This uncertainty
amongst the general public is not altogether surprising however, as there is an
absence of an agreed definition of the term ‘profiling’, even in academic
circles.
What we can be clear about is that profiling uses information gleaned from
the crime scene relating to the offender’s behaviour during the crime. This
can be pooled with other information, such as victim statements (if
available), in order to draw conclusions about the nature of the person who
33
Forensic Psychology: committed the crime. Was the crime planned meticulously or was it
An Introduction
impulsive? Does the offender live locally to the crime scene? What age range
is the offender likely to fall into? What gender is the offender? This
information can then be used to aid the police in investigations and in
targeting resources.
But how exactly is a profiler able to look at the scene and use this to specify
the characteristics of the offender? The answer to this question is not entirely
clear mainly because different people involved in offender profiling can, and
do, use a variety of techniques in order to reach their conclusions. Even those
individuals who claim to be working from the same theoretical standpoint
can still vary in how the theory is applied to any given case.
Interviewing, detecting deception and eye witness research: One of the
most important tasks during investigation is collecting reliable evidence in
order to put together a case of what happened during the event in question.
One of the main sources of this evidence is the people who were
eyewitnesses to the event. In order to gain this information, an interview
needs to be conducted by the investigating police officers with the aim of
gaining as much accurate information from the witness as possible. In
addition, once the suspect has been identified, he/ she too is interviewed in
order to gain his or her view of events and to possibly extract a confession to
the crime. Hence the interview (whether with a witness or suspect) and the
manner in which it is conducted can be crucial to a case.
It is not surprising, therefore, when you think of the processes (those relating
to memory and the retrieval of memory) that are involved in the interview
situation, the psychologists have been interested in this area for years. Given
research findings such as those that state that the recall of events by witness
can be manipulated by the interviewer (either intentionally or unintentionally
– for example, by the type of questions asked), it is clear that those carrying
out the interviews need to receive training in how to conduct the interviews
appropriately.
Psychologists have been instrumental in developing guidance and advice on
how best to interview witnesses and suspects and have also provided training
to various police forces on these techniques. The police can also use
psychologists in order to gain advice on how to interview particular types of
witnesses or suspects. For example, psychologists have conducted research
into interviews with vulnerable witnesses such as the young, the elderly and
learning disabled witnesses. This research can be used to inform the police on
how best to retrieve the information that they require from such witnesses
without causing them too much stress while at the same time ensuring that
the information received is as accurate as possible.
Research performed by forensic psychologists investigating the detection of
deception also has useful applications for the police when interviewing
witnesses and in particular suspects.
Function of forensic psychologist as a police psychologist: The information
here, thus far, been concerned with the application of psychological
knowledge to assist in police investigation. However, there is another field
34
within which the work of forensic psychologists, and the application of their Role and Functions
of Forensic
knowledge, is useful to the police, that is police psychology. Like many Psychologist
organisations, the police force itself presents its own challenges – what type
of person makes a good police officer? What is the best way to train police
officers? How might the attendance at unpleasant scenes of crime, or
repeated exposure to negative events, impact on an individual and how are
those affected in this way best treated?
This area of work is not a new one – psychologists, both occupational and
forensic, have been advising the police on such matters for the last twenty-
five years or so. Psychologists have contributed their knowledge to the
process of police officer recruitment through the introduction of
psychometric tests which measure psychological characteristics that may be
important in relation to such work. These could assess, for example, whether
a person is an assertive individual, open to persuasion, and conscious of
detail. Psychologists have also provided advice on the composition of
interviews and assessment centres which will eliminate those who do not
have the necessary qualities for the role as well as providing an indication of
those who will prosper in such a role.
Another important area of police interest where psychologists have an
ongoing input is the moderation of police stress. The stress faced by police
officers is somewhat different from that in other types of employment.
Whereas stress can be elevated in most jobs through organisational change,
such as decreased workload or a pay rise, the police can be faced with
unexpected, perhaps threatening, situations at any time during their daily
work. These events, due to their unpredictable nature, cannot necessarily be
mediated by organisational change. So the police also need stress
management measures that can assist at an individual level, as and when they
are needed. Psychologists have been instrumental in advising the police on
what mechanisms would be beneficial (such as peer counselling and self-help
programmes), but will also provide professional services to police officers
who require more intensive stress management.
Expert witness: Court cases can involve complex issues including the
presentation of information that is judged to be beyond the knowledge of the
average layperson who may sit on a jury. In such situations, the court permits
the calling of an expert witness who, by definition, has an expertise relating
to the issue in question. Under the circumstances expert witnesses are
permitted to provide their opinion (rather than the facts) on the issue being
discussed.
The way the expert witnesses are called to the court could vary from one
jurisdiction to another. For example, in some countries within Europe, an
expert witness is called by the court itself in order to provide information as
and when it is needed. However, in the UK and USA, the expert is instructed
by either the defence or prosecution in order to provide extra strength to their
version of events.
The use of the psychologist as an expert witness has, in the past, been
constricted by the notion of the expert having to provide information that is
beyond the knowledge of the average person. Historically then, the 35
Forensic Psychology: admissibility of a psychologist’s opinion was often limited to provide
An Introduction
evidence relating to mental impairment or the psychological functioning of
an individual. However, in recent years, the psychologists’ expertise has been
increasingly recognised and they are now being called upon as evidence in
relation to a wide variety of issues. Some examples of these are the impact
that the interviewing techniques have on a suspect or witness, the reliability
of eyewitness testimony, the clinical assessment of suspect or witness, or the
use of profiling techniques during an investigation.
37
Forensic Psychology: Box 2.1 Specific examples of the functions that forensic psychologists
An Introduction
may be asked to perform (Bartol and Bartol, 2008).
Functions of a forensic psychologists with reference to police psychology,
psychology of crime and delinquency, victimology and victim services, legal
psychology, and correctional psychology are described as follows:
Let us elaborate these:
1) Police Psychology: Police psychology includes functions as follows:
• Assist police department in determining optimal shift schedules for their
employers.
• Assist police in developing psychological profiles of serial offenders.
• Establish reliable and valid screening procedures for law enforcement
officer positions at various police and sheriff departments.
• Train police officers on how to deal with mentally ill persons.
• Provide counselling services to officers after a shooting incident.
2) Psychology of Crime and Delinquency: This includes the following
functions:
• Evaluate the effectiveness of preschool intervention strategies designed
to prevent violent behaviour during adolescence.
• Conduct research on the development of psychopathy.
• Consult with legislators and governmental agencies as a research policy
adviser on prevention of stalking.
• Consult with school personnel on identifying troubled youth who are
potentially dangerous.
• Develop a psychological test for assessing risk among the mentally ill.
3) Victimology and Victim Services: Victimology and victim services
include the following functions:
• Evaluate and treat persons who are the victims of crime or witness of
crime.
• Conduct psychological assessments for personal injury matters having to
do with such things as auto accidents, product liability, sexual
harassment and discrimination, and medical negligence or workers’
compensation.
• Educate and train victim service providers on psychological reactions to
criminal victimisation, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
• Assess, support, and counsel those who provide death notification
services.
• Educate service providers on the impact of multiculturalism when
victims seek mental health and support services.
4) Legal Psychology: Under legal psychology the functions mentioned
below are included:
• Conduct child custody evaluations, visitation risk assessments, and child
abuse evaluations.
38
• Assist attorneys in jury selection through community surveys and other Role and Functions
of Forensic
research methods. Psychologist
• Perform evaluations of a defendant’s competency to stand trial.
• Consult with attorneys and the courts concerning custody decisions,
conflict resolution, and the validity of assessment procedures used in the
evaluation of various psychological conditions.
• Conduct competency evaluations for the civil court.
5) Correctional Psychology: Functions under correctional psychology
include
• Establish reliable and valid screening procedures for correctional officer
positions at correctional facilities.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of a variety of existing programmes (a process
called programme evaluation) for juvenile and adult offenders, such as
victim-offender reconciliation programmes, sex offender treatment, or
health education programmes.
• Develop a stress management programme for correctional personnel.
• Assess the development of a system for classifying prison inmates for
placement within a correctional facility.
2.5 REFERENCES
Ainsworth, P. B. (2000). Psychology and Crime: Myths and Reality. Harlow,
Essex : Longman.
Alder, J. R. (Ed.). (2004). Forensic Psychology: Concepts, Debates and
Practice. Cullompton: William.
Alison, L. (2005). The Forensic Psychologist’s Case Book : Psychological
Profiling and Criminal Investigation. Cullompton, UK : William.
Bartol, C. R. & Bartol, A. M. (2008). Introduction to Forensic Psychology:
Research and Application. New Delhi : Sage Publications.
Carson, D. and Bull, R. (2003). Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts,
2nd edn. Chichester : Wiley.
Gudjonsson, G. H. and Haward, L. R. C. (1998). Forensic Psychology: A
guide to practice. London : Routledge.
Harmening, W and Gamez, A. M. (2016). Forensic Psychology. Delhi:
Pearson
Veeraraghavan, Vimala (2009). Handbook of Forensic Psychology, Select
Scientific Publishers, New Delhi.
Weiner, I. B. & Hess, A. K. (Eds.) (1987). Handbook of Forensic
Psychology. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Wrigthsman, L. S. (2001). Forensic Psychology Bekmont, CA : Wardsworth.
3.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you will be able to,
3.1 INTRODUCTION
As such when we talk about assessment and evaluation in forensic
psychology, they are not different from assessment and evaluation that
generally takes place in psychology. Though, in the context of forensic
psychology, the assessment and evaluation becomes relevant due to its
implication as often the results and the interpretations are to be produced in
court based on which certain decisions could be taken. The main use of
forensic assessment is to assess the mental capacity and functioning of the
individual that is often reported to the court. They are also used to assess the
competency of the individuals and identify any future risks.
Forensic psychology represents the intersection between law and psychology.
Psychologists are expected to render expert opinions needed for legal
determinations. They also conduct psychological testing which is highly
objective and accurate which are in turn used for taking fair judicial decisions
and make fair judgement. The assessment and evaluation in forensic
psychology is not as such different from that in other fields. In the present
unit, we will discuss the role of assessment and evaluation in forensic
psychology and will also look at various psychological tests that can be used.
1
Dr. Bibha Rani, Former Director, Directorate of Forensic Science, Ministry of Home
Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi (Unit adapted from Unit 3, Bloc 3 of BPCE021)
42
3.2 ROLE OF ASSESSMENT AND Assessment and
Evaluation in
EVALUATION IN FORENSIC Forensic
Psychology
PSYCHOLOGY
Forensic psychology is a branch of Psychology and, therefore, it is not
possible to separate the developments in forensic psychology from the
developments in the broader discipline. As a result many of the psychological
assessment techniques, tests and measurements used for the assessment of
offenders for forensic purposes have their origins outside the field. Their
availability to forensic psychologists is contingent on developments in
academic, educational and clinical psychology.
The APA Dictionary of Psychology (2007) defines psychological assessment
as “the gathering and integration of data in order to make a psychological
evaluation, decision, or recommendation”. Multiple tools of assessment are –
interview, behavioural observations, tests, and other specialised instruments.
A psychological test is a “standardised instrument (that is, a test, inventory,
or scale)” used for the purpose of measuring any variety of abilities,
aptitudes, or attributes.
The practice of forensic psychology relies heavily on psychological research
and assessment tools. Forensic psychologists frequently use tools like
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, Wechsler intelligence test
Hare psychopathic checklist version, structured interview of reported
symptom, and personality assessment inventories.
The forensic assessment differs from traditional testing in some important
ways which include purpose, and understanding of who is being served. The
major difference is that in mental health evaluation the client is the examinee
whereas in forensic evaluation specific legal questions regarding the
examinee has to be addressed in order to assist in decision making.
Forensic examinee are frequently mandated for an evaluation and often
assumed to have significant reasons to be purposefully selective in self-
disclosure so that a much stronger focus must be placed on examiner
objectivity and assessment of examinee’s response style. Because of threats
of conscious deception or selective self-presentation in forensic evaluations,
there is more emphasis on use of multiple sources of data to verify
information as well as strong reliance on external sources (i.e. collateral
observations, historical records, and reports of others) apart from the formal
assessment interactions with the examinee.
Forensic psychology assessment and evaluation is more than a mere
psychometric evaluation and this evaluation and assessment includes
assessment of criminal responsibility, trial competency, assessment of
malingering, assessment of mental health and identifying mental disability,
neuropsychological assessment and so on.
43
Forensic Psychology: Box 3.1 Distinction between Forensic Evaluation and Therapeutic
An Introduction
Evaluation2
You have learned that the forensic psychologist is asked to make evaluation
of defendant’s mental state. Now if you study the distinction between
forensic and therapeutic evaluation, your concept of forensic psychology will
be better.
A forensic psychologist’s interactions with the ethical responsibilities to the
client differ widely from those of a psychologist dealing with a client in
clinical setting.
a) Scope: Rather than the broad set of issues a psychologist addresses in
clinical setting, a forensic psychologist addresses a narrowly defined set
of events or interactions of a non-clinical nature.
b) Importance of client’s perspective: A clinician places primary
importance on understanding the client’s unique point of view, while the
forensic psychologist is interested in accuracy, and the client’s view
point is secondary.
c) Voluntariness: Usually in clinical setting a psychologist is dealing with
a voluntary client. A forensic psychologist evaluates clients by order of a
judge or at behest of an attorney.
d) Autonomy: Voluntary clients have more latitude and autonomy
regarding the assessment objectives. Any assessment usually takes their
concerns into account. The objectives of a forensic examination are
confined by the applicable statutes or common law elements that pertain
to the legal issue in question.
v) Threats to validity: While the client and therapist are working towards
a common goal, although unconscious distortion may occur, in the
forensic context there is a substantially greater likelihood of intentional
and conscious distortion.
f) Relationship and dynamics: Therapeutic interactions work towards
developing a trusting, empathic therapeutic alliance, a forensic
psychologist may not ethically nurture the client or act in a “helping”
role, as the forensic evaluator had divided loyalties and there are
substantial limits on confidentiality he/ she can guarantee the client. A
forensic evaluator must always be aware of manipulation in the
adversary context of a legal setting. These concerns mandate an
emotional distance that is unlike a therapeutic interaction.
g) Pace and setting: Unlike therapeutic interactions which may be guided
by many factors, place great time constraints on the evaluation without
opportunities for reevaluation. The forensic examiner focuses on the
importance of accuracy and the finality of legal dispositions.
2
Box 3.1 is adapted from Unit1, Block 1 of BPCE021 and is authored by Prof. Dipesh
Chandra Nath
44
Check Your Progress I Assessment and
Evaluation in
Forensic
1) What is psychological assessment? Psychology
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
48
Box 3.2 Psychological Testing3 Assessment and
Evaluation in
Psychological testing constitutes administration of psychological tests. Here, Forensic
it is important to understand what are psychological tests. Psychological tests Psychology
can be described as tools that can be used to measure psychological entities
like intelligence, personality, attitude, interest, achievement motivation and
so on. Let us look at some of the definitions of psychological tests.
Psychological test was defined by Gregory (2010, page 16) as “a standardised
procedure for sampling behavior and describing it with categories or scores”.
Psychological test can be described as measurement of sample of behaviour
that is standardised and objective (Anastasi, 1969).Kaplan and Saccuzzo
(2013) explained psychological test a device or technique used in
quantification of behaviour that helps in not only understanding behaviour
but also to predicting it.
Some of the main properties of psychological tests are apparent from the
definitions discussed above. To highlight these properties, psychological tests
are objective in nature. They also have predictive and diagnostic value. A
psychological test is also standardised, meaning that the procedure followed
while administering and scoring the test is uniform and the instructions and
scoring are provided in the manual of the test. Besides this the manual will
also provide information about the norms based on which an individual’s
score can be interpreted. Any psychological test measures a sample of
behaviour pertaining to certain psychological entity or variable. And though
there are speed tests as well, often psychological test are power tests, that is,
the difficulty level of items increaser gradually in their difficulty level. Thus,
it is possible to identify the potential/ ability of different individuals, those
having higher and those having lower potentiality/ ability. It denotes the
extent of quality related to the psychological variable an individual has.
A psychological test also needs to be valid and reliable. Validity can be
described as the characteristics of a psychological test that states whether the
test measures what it is supposed to or purports to measure. Thus, a test on
adjustment needs to measure adjustment and a test on self esteem needs to
measure self esteem. A ruler, that measures length, is not a valid instrument
to measure weight and a weighing machine is not a valid instrument to
measure length. Similarly, a good psychological test needs to be valid and
should measure the entity (or the sample of behaviour) that it was developed
to measure. Reliability denotes consistency of the psychological test over a
period of time. For example, when a length of a table is measured with the
help a ruler on a certain day and then after six months, the length obtained
will be same. Thus, the ruler can be termed as consistent instrument to
measure the length. This is comparatively easy as table is a tangible entity
and as such its length will not vary, unless it is broken or subjected to some
other modification, in which case as well, such a modification or change will
be easily visible. However, in case of psychological entities that are
intangible, establishing reliability or consistency is a difficult task. Therefore,
if a psychological test on adjustment is developed and it is administered on a
group of adolescents, the scores obtained at a certain point and some time
later, say after six months need to be more or less same or similar.
3
Box 3.2 is taken from Unit 6 of BPCC134 and is authored by Prof. Suhas Shetgovekar.
49
Forensic Psychology:
An Introduction
3.4 PERSONALITY TESTING IN FORENSIC
PSYCHOLOGY
Central to the psychological perspective is the idea that almost all causes of
criminal behaviour originate in the personality. Personality is defined as the
complex set of emotional and behavioural attributes that tend to remain
relatively constant as the individual moves from situation to situation.
Psychiatry goes a step further by postulating that mental illness and crime
both have similar properties (in being responses to the same stressors and
each having maladaptive qualities).
As long ago as 1870, Henry Maudsly, in his book, Body and Mind, wrote
that criminals would go insane if they didn’t engage in crime. This is because
their pathological urges must find expression in something. So, it has long
been recognised that there is a strong relationship between mental illness and
crime (not to say that one is the cause of another). Criminal adaptation to this
condition of helplessness occurs because choosing crime over other possible
alternatives provides certain psychological advantages or gratifications,
which are as follows:
50
In forensic field the personality testing is utilised to address questions like Assessment and
Evaluation in
risk assessment, mental illness diagnosis and treatment recommendations, Forensic
competency and capacity, tort cases where emotional distress claims are Psychology
made, and criminal cases where mental illness factors are being presented.
Some of the personality tests are described as follows:
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPA): It is known
as the MMPI, and its revised second edition (MMPI-2) are psychological
assessment instruments completed by the person being evaluated, and scored
and interpreted by the examiner. The clinician evaluates the test taker’s
personal characteristics. By analysing the test taker’s patterns of response to
the test items, the examiner is able to draw some tentative conclusions about
the client’s level of adaptation, behavioural characteristics, and personality
traits. The MMPI-2 is preferred to the older MMPI because of its larger and
more representative community comparison group (also referred to as the
“normative” group).
The results of the MMPI-2 allow the test administrator to make inferences
about the client’s typical behaviours and way of thinking. The test outcomes
help the examiner to determine the test taker’s severity of impairment,
outlook on life, approaches to problem solving, typical mood states, likely
diagnoses, and potential problems in treatment. The MMPI-2 is used in a
wide range of settings for a variety of procedures. In addition, the instrument
is often used by expert witnesses in forensic settings as part of an evaluation
of a defendant’s mental health, particularly in criminal cases. The MMPI has
also been used to evaluate candidates for employment in some fields, and in
educational counselling.
Personality Assessment Inventory: The Personality Assessment Inventory
(PAI) provides information relevant for clinical diagnosis, treatment planning
and screening for psychopathology. The PAI covers constructs most relevant
to a broad-based assessment of mental disorders.
This is a 344-item instrument requires 50-60 minutes to administer. Each
item is rated on a 4 point scale ranging from false, not at all true, to very true.
The PAI consists of 22 non-overlapping full scales covering the constructs
most relevant to a broad-based assessment of mental disorders: 4 validity
scales, 11 clinical scales, 5 treatment scales, and 2 interpersonal scales. To
facilitate interpretation and cover the full range of complex clinical
constructs, 10 full scales contain conceptually derived sub-scales.
Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R): The NEO Personality
Inventory (NEO PI-R) is a highly-regarded assessment of personality. Based
on the Five-Factor model, the NEO PI-R measures the interpersonal,
motivational, emotional, and attitudinal styles of adults and adolescents. It
consists of 240 personality items and 3 validity items, and is available in two
forms. Form-S is designed for self-reports and Form-R is written in the third
person for observer reports.
51
Forensic Psychology: It is used in the following areas:
An Introduction
• In counseling and clinical settings with adults as well as senior high
school and college students.
• In business and industrial settings.
• Psychological research, including studies in sport psychology and
recreation.
The NEO PI-R was designed to provide a general description of normal
personality relevant to clinical, counselling and educational situations. NEO
PI- R items and materials were designed to be easily read and understood.
The five domains (factors) measured by the NEO PI-R provide a general
description of personality, while the facet scales allow more detailed analysis.
These five factors and their facet scales include:
a) Neuroticism (Anxiety, Hostility, Depression, Self-Consciousness,
Impulsiveness, Vulnerability)
b) Extraversion (Warmth, Gregariousness, Assertiveness, Activity,
Excitement- Seeking, Positive Emotions)
c) Openness to Experience (Fantasy, Aesthetics, Feelings, Actions, Ideas,
Values)
d) Agreeableness (Trust, Modesty, Compliance, Altruism, Straight
forwardness, Tender-Mindedness)
e) Conscientiousness (Competence, Self-Discipline, Achievement-Striving,
Dutifulness, Order, Deliberation
Projective Tests: In psychology, a projective test is a type of personality test
in which the individual offers responses to ambiguous scenes, words or
images. This type of test emerged from the psychoanalytic school of thought,
which suggested that people have unconscious thoughts or urges. These
projective tests were intended to uncover such unconscious desires that are
hidden from conscious awareness.
In many projective tests, the participant is shown an ambiguous image and
then asked to give the first response that comes to mind. The key to
projective tests is the ambiguity of the stimuli. According to the theory
behind such tests, clearly defined questions result in answers that are
carefully crafted by the conscious mind. By providing the participant with a
question or stimulus that is not clear, the underlying and unconscious
motivations or attitudes are revealed. These tests are used in forensic setting
in order to find out the underlying psychodynamics of a criminal behaviour.
3.6 REFERENCES
Anastasi, A. Psychological Testing. (1969) New York: Macmillan
Anastasi, A. and Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bruce A. Arrigo, Introduction to Forensic Psychology (2000), Academic
Press, USA.
George J. Dudycha, Psychology for Law Enforcement Officers (1976),
Charles C Thomas, USA.
Harmening, W and Gamez, A. M. (2016). Forensic Psychology. Delhi:
Pearson
John M. Macdonald, Psychiatry and the Criminal (1976), Charles C Thomas,
USA.
Kaplan, R. M. and Saccuzzo, D. P. (2013). Psychological testing: Principles,
applications and issues. Belmont CA: Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning.
Howitt, D. (2002). Forensic and Criminal Psychology, Prentice Hall, UK/
USA.
Murphy, K. R. and Davidshofer, C. O. (1998). Psychological testing:
Principles and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Veeraraghavan, V and Shetgovekar, S. (2016). Textbook of Parametric and
Nonparametric Statistics. Delhi: Sage.
54