Unit 4-Reference Handouts - MBM 208: L&T and Iit Bombay Sign Mou For Technical Collaboration
Unit 4-Reference Handouts - MBM 208: L&T and Iit Bombay Sign Mou For Technical Collaboration
L&T and the Indian Institute of Technology (IITB) Bombay have signed a three-year
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for technical collaboration in the areas of
information technology, technology management, chemical engineering, CAD-CAM,
high-end engineering services, industrial design, communications and embedded
systems, mobile communications and IP network. The signing of this MoU is aimed
at strengthening the existing interaction between L&T and IITB in mutually beneficial
areas. The collaboration would be through one or more of the following modes :
Sponsoring L&T's Build India M.Tech scholarship programme at IIT Bombay.
Sponsoring student projects/fellowships in the two year M.Tech and five year
dual degree programmes at IIT Bombay.
Sponsoring eligible employees of L&T for M.Tech/Ph.D. degrees at IIT
Bombay.
Sponsoring R&D projects either at IITB or L&T.
Training of L&T personnel through Continuing Education Programmes
conducted by IIT Bombay in areas of interest to L&T.
L&T will also be using IIT Bombay's assistance in the preparation of testing materials
and assessment center tools for L&T's technological leadership programme
initiative.
2(a) “B” shall fully and promptly furnish “A” with such “know-how” as “A” may
require from time to time during the term of this agreement in connection
with the manufacture of the products.
(b) “B” will depute ……………technicians at the expense of “A” to held to
establish and operate the plant at…………….and to train………..Indian
technicians in its work in…………….at expense of “A”.
© “A” at their expense, shall procure and maintain patents in India on such
inventions and improvements made by “A” : as “A” in their sole discretion
shall choose. “B” shall also have the right to use the invention and
improvements in all countries outside Indian and shall take full title to
such procured by “B” outside India. However, “B” shall not, without the
consent of “A”, licence any third party under said patents except its
subsidiaries, its parent company or other subsidiaries of the parent
company.
(d) “A” shall manufacture the PRODUCTS in strict accordance with the said
know-how, the STANDARD of quality embodied therein or as may be set
from time to time by “B”. To ensure the performance of this provision, “B”
shall have the right to inspect at reasonable intervals and during business
hours the facilities of “A” to the manufacture of the said PRODUCTS.
(a) an exclusive licence to make in India the products by the use of any or all
of “Bs” know-how.
(b) a non-exclusive licenses to use and sell the said PRODUCTS throughout
the world.
4(a) in consideration of “B” having agreed to disclose to “A” the latest method
of manufacture of PRODUCTS and other processes and having further
agreed to supply technical advice and date, “A” agrees to pay “B” a sum
of …………..which due and payable in installments as follows.
……………………..
Total ……………………..
5(a) “A” shall render to “B” bi-annual/annual reports on or before the last day
of………..following each calendar year with respect to which royalties
are payable under this agreement, stating the amount of PRODUCT
manufactured in the plant during the preceding year the amount of royalty
due and payable with respect thereto. At the time of rendering such
reports A shall pay to B the amount of royalty stated therein to be due and
payable.
7(a) “A” shall maintain secrecy at all time during this agreement of all the know
how, drawings and the like disclosed by “B” to “A” and/or pursuant to
the terms herein or about which “A” learns during the performance of
this agreement.
(b) “A” will, however, be free to sub-license the technical know-how, product
design/engineering design under the agreement to another Indian
party/parties, should it become necessary. The terms of such sub-licence
will, however, be as mutually agreed to by all parties concerned including
“B” and will be subject to the approval of the Government.
8. This agreement shall become effective after it has been duly approved
and signed by “A” and “B” and the approval of the Government of India
has been obtained thereto.
9(a) This agreement shall remain effective for a period of……….. years from
the date of signing the agreement. Upon the expiration of this agreement,
the KNOW HOW THEREFORE delivered to “A” shall remain its property
for its full and free use thereof.
(b) Subject to the approval of the Indian Government, this agreement may
be renewed in whole or in part for further period by mutual agreement.
10. This agreement shall be binding upon and ensure to the benefit of the
successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto, and the
obligations hereunder shall not be assignable by either party without
written consent being first obtained from the other.
12. Either party may by notice in writing to the other terminate this
agreement in the event of :
(a) Any default by such other party in the performance or observation of any
of its obligations under this agreement which is not remedied to the
satisfaction of the party giving such notice within ninety (90) days following
delivery of such notice, such notice to contain reasonable particulars of
such default and to state the intention to terminate the agreement under
this clause unless such default is made good or remedied.
13. Neither party shall be in default under this agreement by reason of its
failure or delay in the performance of its obligations is such failure or
delay is caused by acts of God, Government laws and regulations, strikes,
lock-outs, war or any other cause beyond its control and without its fault
or negligence.
14. All disputes, questions, or differences, etc., arising in connection with this
agreement shall be referred to a single arbitrator in India in case parties
agree upon one, otherwise two arbitrators in India are to be appointed by
each party in accordance with and subject to the provision of the
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, or any other enactment or statutory
modification thereof for the time being in force.
I. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT:
Over the last 20 years, the human population has increased by a third,
global trade has tripled, and per capita income has gone up by 40%. Annual
emissions of the main greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, have also
increased by one third.
SHRINKING RESOURCES
CHANGING WORLD
BIODIVERSITY
Sixteen thousand species are threatened with extinction. Habitat loss is a major
factor as many forests are cleared for agriculture. The UN estimates the global
annual loss of primary forest is 50,000 km2.
WATER
The availability of
fresh water will
decline, according to
the UN, who project
that by 2025 1.8bn
people will be
affected by water
scarcity. Sanitation is
also a major issue, as
contaminated water is
the greatest single
cause of human disease and death. The state of the world's fisheries is also
touched on by the report which says many fish stocks are overexploited, while
the demand for fish is expected to rise alongside growing populations.
The main objectives of this convention are the protection of endangered species
prominent in international trade through appropriate trade control measures and
monitoring the status of such species.
The main objectives of the convention are the reduction of the production of
hazardous waste and the restriction of transboundary movement and disposal of
such waste.
It also aims to ensure that any transboundary movement and disposal of
hazardous waste, when allowed, is strictly controlled and is undertaken in an
environmentally sound and responsible way. Locally, draft regulations are being
prepared in an effort to control the movement of such waste.
Antarctic Treaty
The protocol is aimed at ensuring measures to protect the earth's ozone layer,
which were designed to restrict the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and
halons. Parliament has approved the ratification of the Copenhagen
Amendments to the Protocol and the necessary steps are now being taken for
the instrument for ratification to be deposited..
South Africa is a founder member of the IWC and has a proud record regarding
the conservation of whales and research on whale management.
KYOTO Protocol:
Adaptation
The Kyoto Protocol, like the Convention, is also designed to assist countries in
adapting to the adverse effects of climate change. It facilitates the development
and deployment of techniques that can help increase resilience to the impacts of
climate change.
By the end of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol in 2012, a new
international framework needs to have been negotiated and ratified that can
deliver the stringent emission reductions the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) has clearly indicated are needed.
National Laws:
In India, the following Acts and Rules govern the various aspects of
environmental regulation -
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
The Water Prevention and Control of Pollution Cess Act, 1977
The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution)Act, 1981
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
The Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001
The Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000
The Recycled Plastics Manufacture and Usage Rules, 1999
The Rules for the Manufacture, Use, Import and Export and Storage of
Hazardous micro-organisms
Genetically engineered organisms or cells, 1989
The Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules, 1989
The Hazardous Wastes( Management and Handling ) Rules, 1989
The Bio-Medical Waste ( Management and Handling ) Rules, 1998
Dumping and disposal of fly ash discharged from coal or lignite based
thermal power plants, 1999
Noise Pollution( Regulation and Control ) Rules, 2000
The Ozone Depleting Substances ( Regulation and Control )Rules, 2000
The 2-T Oil ( Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 1998
The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
The National Environment Appellate Authority Act, 1997
The National Environment Tribunal Act, 1995
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002
Example:
Environmental Regulation
The demand for Indian Petrochemical products is high mainly because of its
quality, competitive pricing and above all for its environment friendly
petrochemical products. India's low cost, high-end petrochemical products,
environment friendly manufacturing expertise, and developing world class
infrastructure are the main leveraging factors for the rise of this industry. India
offers world class and environment friendly petrochemicals at a substantial
discount compared to its western counterparts. Indian environmental
regulation are as per international standards and adhere to the Kyoto
protocol.
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS
A major problem of environmental economics has been defined as the
selection of a strategy for the management of the environment which best
promotes the collective welfare of society. Economists view the
environment as a reservoir of natural resources (some renewable and
others non-renewable). However, problems arise when the following
question is asked: What is of greater value to the community - industrial
development, which creates wealth, or unspoiled scenery, which creates
and supports high quality of life? The question to be asked is how the
private cost (to the manufacturer) of environmental pollution (usually zero)
can be reconciled with the public cost (often considerable)? This
underlines the inability of traditional market forces to prevent deterioration
of the environment.
ISO 14000
ISO stands for "International Organization for Standardization". This is an
international organization that designs and writes codes of practice (called
standards) to ensure that actions and processes are carried out in a
correct and uniform manner. This is especially important where operations
require that equipment must be made to fit different countries' systems
and the tolerance or margin for error is very small. ISO 14000 is an
international standard for environmental management, which sets
guidelines on how to operate environmental management systems in
different companies in different countries. There are a number of different
detailed standards in the ISO 14 000 series, e.g. ISO 14 001 -
Environmental Management Systems, ISO 14 010 - Guidelines for
Environmental Auditing and ISO 14 040 - Life Cycle Assessment.
***************
FOREIGN INVESTMENT POLICY-FDI
& FIIA. Foreign Direct Investment
Policy-FDI
RBI-Automatic FIPB
100 74 49 26 100 74 49 26
Power Single
brand
Airports product
(Greenfield) retailing
(51%)
Construction
development
projects, SEZs
Industrial parks
Refining
(private)
Telecom
equipments
Wholesale trading
NBFCs
This surge in FII investment has led to the cumulative net investments by FII in to
Indian equities to total US$ 66.8 billion by the end of 2007, since December
1993, when FIIs were allowed to enter India. This is a clear index of how bullish
this category of investors has been on the prospects of the Indian market.
Government Initiatives
The ceiling for overall investment for FIIs is 24 per cent of the paid-up
capital of the Indian company,
20 per cent of the paid-up capital in the case of public sector banks.
The ceiling of 24 per cent for FII investment can be raised up to sectoral
cap/statutory ceiling, subject to the approval of the board and the general
body of the company passing a special resolution to that effect.
This led to the expansion of trading activities between Europe and Asia. By
1300, networks of trade ran from England to China, France, Italy, across the
Mediterranean to Egypt, and then to Central Asia (the Silk Route). The trade in
commodities continued well into the 17th century. By 1800, the Atlantic and
Indian Ocean systems were connected to one another through the flow of
commodities and by the operations of the British, French, and Dutch overseas
companies.
The economic conditions that prevailed in the eighteenth century continued well
into the nineteenth century. With the introduction of railways and steamships,
transportation costs came down significantly, and this created new circuits of
capital accumulation. In the twentieth century, technological developments were
further reducing natural barriers like geographical distance. The cost of
information processing and communication fell significantly in the last few
decades, accelerating the pace of globalization.
Effects of globalization
Globalization has various aspects which affect the world in several different ways
such as:
Industrial - emergence of worldwide production markets and broader
access to a range of foreign products for consumers and companies.
Particularly movement of material and goods between and within national
boundaries.
Financial - emergence of worldwide financial markets and better access to
external financing for borrowers. Simultaneous though not necessarily
purely globalist is the emergence of under or un-regulated foreign
exchange and speculative markets.
Economic - realization of a global common market, based on the freedom
of exchange of goods and capital.
Political - some use "globalization" to mean the creation of a world
government, or cartels of governments (e.g. WTO, World Bank, and IMF)
which regulate the relationships among governments and guarantees the
rights arising from social and economic globalization. [13] Politically, the
United States has enjoyed a position of power among the world powers; in
part because of its strong and wealthy economy. With the influence of
globalization and with the help of The United States’ own economy, the
People's Republic of China has experienced some tremendous growth
within the past decade. If China continues to grow at the rate projected by
the trends, then it is very likely that in the next twenty years, there will be a
major reallocation of power among the world leaders. China will have
enough wealth, industry, and technology to rival the United States for the
position of leading world power.
Informational - increase in information flows between geographically
remote locations. Arguably this is a technological change with the advent
of fibre optic communications, satellites, and increased availability of
telephony and Internet.
Language - the most popular language is English
o About 75% of the world's mail, telexes, and cables are in English.
o Approximately 60% of the world's radio programs are in English.
o About 90% of all Internet traffic is using English.
Competition - Survival in the new global business market calls for
improved productivity and increased competition. Due to the market
became worldwide not specific area, there are many industries around the
world. Industries have to upgrade their products and use technology
skillfully for facing the competition and increasing their competitive.[16]
Cultural - growth of cross-cultural contacts; advent of new categories of
consciousness and identities which embodies cultural diffusion, the desire
to increase one's standard of living and enjoy foreign products and ideas,
adopt new technology and practices, and participate in a "world culture".
Some bemoan the resulting consumerism and loss of languages. Also see
Transformation of culture.
Ecological- the advent of global environmental challenges that might be
solved with international cooperation, such as climate change, cross-
boundary water and air pollution, over-fishing of the ocean, and the spread
of invasive species. Since many factories are built in developing countries
with less environmental regulation, globalism and free trade may increase
pollution. On the other hand, economic development historically required a
"dirty" industrial stage, and it is argued that developing countries should
not, via regulation, be prohibited from increasing their standard of living.
Social (International cultural exchange) - increased circulation by people
of all nations with fewer restrictions.
o Spreading of multiculturalism, and better individual access to
cultural diversity (e.g. through the export of Hollywood and
Bollywood movies). Some consider such "imported" culture a
danger, since it may supplant the local culture, causing reduction in
diversity or even assimilation. Others consider multiculturalism to
promote peace and understanding between peoples.
o Greater international travel and tourism
o Greater immigration, including illegal immigration
o Spread of local consumer products (e.g. food) to other countries
(often adapted to their culture).
o Worldwide fads and pop culture such as Pokémon, Sudoku, Numa
Numa, Origami, Idol series, YouTube, Orkut, Facebook, and
MySpace. Accessible to those who have Internet or Television,
leaving out a substantial segment of the Earth's population.
o Worldwide sporting events such as FIFA World Cup and the
Olympic Games.
o Incorporation of multinational corporations in to new media. As the
sponsors of the All-Blacks rugby team, Adidas had created a
parallel website with a downloadable interactive rugby game for its
fans to play and compete.
Technical
o Development of a global telecommunications infrastructure and
greater transborder data flow, using such technologies as the
Internet, communication satellites, submarine fiber optic cable, and
wireless telephones
o Increase in the number of standards applied globally; e.g. copyright
laws, patents and world trade agreements.
Legal/Ethical
o The creation of the international criminal court and international
justice movements.
o Crime importation and raising awareness of global crime-fighting
efforts and cooperation.
Whilst it is all too easy to look at the positive aspects of Globalization and the
great benefits that are apparent everywhere, there are also several negative
occurrences that can only be the result of or major motivating factors that inspire
some corporations to globalize. Globalization – the growing integration of
economies and societies around the world – has been one of the most hotly-
debated topics in international economics over the past few years. Rapid growth
and poverty reduction in China, India, and other countries that were poor 20
years ago, has been a positive aspect of globalization. But globalization has also
generated significant international opposition over concerns that it has increased
inequality and environmental degradation.
3. GLOBALISATION:
3.1. Concept & History:
Globalization has many facets like Cultural, Economic & Political. Culturally,
globalization is defined as a process of growing interdependence between all
people of this planet. People are linked together economically and socially by
trade, investments and governance. These links are spurred by market
liberalization and information, communication and transportation technologies.
Cultural global ties also grow through globalization as news ideas and fashions
through trade, travel and media move around the globe at lightning speed. Global
brands such as Coca-Cola, Nike & Sony serve as common reference to
consumers all over the World. An individual in China enjoys the same soft drink
as an individual in Puerto Rico--at opposite ends of the globe. However, these
ties may also cause strains: for example Western Ideas of freedom of expression
may clash with Islamic views on Religious tolerance. And if not strains, critics
contend this is really an imposition of cultural imperialism in order to preserve
economic interests.
In the end, the political aspects of globalization are evidenced when governments
create international rules and institutions to deal with issues such as trade,
human rights, and the environment. Among the new institutions and rules that
have come to fruition as a result of globalization are the World Trade
Organization (WTO), the Euro currency (Euro), the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA), to name a few. Whether a government is to consciously
open itself to cross-border links, is the central question of this aspect.
History:
Globalization can be traced to times when Buddhism spread from India to China
in 1st century AD. That was when cultural links between both countries were
established. By 1300 AD, the Song Dynasty in China linked Europe and China by
land and sea across Eurasia and the Indian Ocean. The year 1300 saw the
creation of the Ottoman Empire which spanned Europe, North Africa, and the
Middle East, and connected the dynasties in Central Asia and India.
This led to the expansion of trading activities between Europe and Asia. By 1300,
networks of trade ran from England to China, France, Italy, across the
Mediterranean to Egypt, and then to Central Asia (the Silk Route). The trade in
commodities continued well into the 17th century. By 1800, the Atlantic and
Indian Ocean systems were connected to one another through the flow of
commodities and by the operations of the British, French, and Dutch overseas
companies.
The economic conditions that prevailed in the eighteenth century continued well
into the nineteenth century. With the introduction of railways and steamships,
transportation costs came down significantly, and this created new circuits of
capital accumulation. In the twentieth century, technological developments were
further reducing natural barriers like geographical distance. The cost of
information processing and communication fell significantly in the last few
decades, accelerating the pace of globalization.
The period of the gold standard and liberalization of the 19th century is often
called "The First Era of Globalization". This era grew along with industrialization.
In essence, it was argued that nations would trade effectively, and that any
temporary disruptions in supply or demand would correct themselves
automatically. The institution of the gold standard came in steps in major
industrialized nations between approximately 1850 and 1880, though exactly
when various nations were truly on the gold standard is contentiously debated.
Globalization in the era since World War II has been driven by trade negotiation
rounds, originally under the auspices of GATT, which led to a series of
agreements to remove restrictions on "free trade". The Uruguay round led to a
treaty to create the World Trade Organization or WTO, to mediate trade disputes.
Other bi- and trilateral trade agreements, including sections of Europe's
Maastricht Treaty and the North American Free Trade Agreement have also
been signed in pursuit of the goal of reducing tariffs and barriers to trade.
(Source: http://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/glob_is.htm)
Stages:
First Wave: globalization of colonization (3/4th of world colonized by UK,
France, Spain, Portugal)
Second wave: Self-reliance, Independence and decolonization
Third wave: Religious Globalization (Missionaries from west came to east &
vice versa)
Fourth wave (Modern Era): Economic Globalization.
Multinational Corporations:
While a narrow span of control creates a tall organization with many managers
and centralized decision making, wide span creates a flat organization with fewer
managers and more delegation of authority. The degree to which authority is
delegated determines centralization and decentralization.
But a firm offering many product lines, will find this structure less successful. In a
product division based organizational structure, product heads are responsible
for all functions relating to a product. This enables the managers to gain
expertise of various functions relating to the product. Marketing plans can vary
among product groups and need not be tied up with the overall organizational
marketing plan.
WorldWide Area Structure and Strategic Business Units (SBU) are more popular
forms of organizational structure in big corporations. SBUs function as
independent organizations with a separate income statement and balance sheet.
But the challenge of globalization and the growth in technology have brought
about more complex organizational structures like the Matrix structure and the
management networks.
Exporting
Turnkey Projects
Licensing
Franchising
Joint Ventures
The disadvantage is that the firm may create competitors in the process. The
main advantage of licensing is that the licensee bears the cost and risk of
opening a foreign market. The disadvantages include the risk of losing
technological know-how to the licensee.
To make the alliance work, factors to be taken into consideration are selection of
partner, structure of the alliance and management of the alliance. The key issues
involved in managing alliances are building trust and learning from each other.
Continuum of Internationalization:
International –Multinational/Transnational-Global
Entry strategies:
Export-Licensing-Franchising-Turnkey projects-subsidiary-Joint ventures
Organizational structure:
International division-Functional-Geographic-Product-Matrix-Network
The major items that India exported during the year 2007-08 are agriculture and
allied products, ores and minerals, manufactured goods and petroleum, crude
and products, and their share in the total exports are 11.36%, 5.66%, 63.58%
9.39% and 15.64%, respectively. On detailed examination it is seen that growth
in exports has largely been in primary products like sugar (95%), rice (87%), oil
meal (62.4 %), spices (49%) and iron ore (47 %). In fact, the share of agriculture
and allied activities in total exports has seen a marginal rise from 10.04 % in
2006-07 to 11.36 % in 2007-08. Engineering exports, which account for 35% of
manufactured exports of India, actually saw a dip in growth rate from 36% in FY
2007 to 24% in FY2008, which is a matter of concern since this can be occurring
as a result of falling demand in the backdrop of global slowdown and economic
recession in the US. Among the total exports, Agriculture & Allied products export
increased by 42.46%, Petroleum Crude and Petro-products by 33.3%, Ores &
Minerals by 28.75%, and Manufacturing Goods by 19.19%, over the previous
year. Destination-wise, although the US remained the principal export market, its
share declined to 13.0 per cent during 2007-08 from 14.9 per cent in the previous
year. The other major destinations were the UAE (9.7 per cent), China (6.8 per
cent), Singapore (4.3 per cent), and the UK (4.1 per cent). During 2007-08,
India’s exports to the EU, North America, Eastern Europe and Asian developing
countries showed an accelerated growth, while that to OPEC, African developing
countries and Latin American developing countries showed deceleration.
According to the World Economic Outlook released in July 2008, the growing use
of export restrictions by food exporting countries (which includes India too) to
raise domestic food supplies and lower domestic prices for ensuring food security
has put pressure on world prices. Export restrictions by some major rice
exporting countries have contributed substantially to the run-up in rice prices in
2008.
The trend in growth in invisible receipts continued with 26.2 per cent during 2007-
08, which was broadly comparable with that of 28.3 per cent in 2006-07, mainly
due to the momentum maintained in the growth of software services exports,
travel, transportation, along with the steady inflow of remittances from overseas
Indians. However, appreciation of the value of Indian rupee vis-à-vis US dollar
from Rs. 45.22 in 2006-07 to Rs. 40.18 in 2007-08 raised apprehensions that it
might adversely affect India’s software and the business process outsourcing
(BPO) industry.
The major items, which India imported during the year 2007-08 are petroleum
and petro products, bulk consumption goods, capital goods, textiles, chemicals &
related products and gold and silver, and their share in the total imports are
33.38%, 2.22%, 15.63%, 1.03%, 7.81% and 7.47%, respectively. India saw the
import bill for petroleum and petro-products rising to US $ 79.6 billion in 2007-08
from US $ 57.1 billion in 2006-07 owing to rising international crude prices.
The value of total trade in goods and services as percentage of GDP at market
price declined to 45.8% in 2007-08 from 47.2% in 2006-07. The value of
merchandise trade deficit during 2006-07 was US $ 64.9 billion, which rose to a
level of US $ 90.1 billion in 2007-08. The trade deficit on non-oil account during
2007-08 amounted to US $ 25.9 billion against US $ 20.9 billion in the previous
year.
As per the World Economic Outlook released in September 2007, world trade
volume had been projected to increase by 7.4% in 2008. Although the latest
estimates released in July 2008 show that global real GDP growth on a
purchasing power parity basis is expected to decelerate from 5.0 percent in 2007
to 4.1 percent in 2008 and further to 3.9 percent in 2009, which can adversely
affect India’s trade performance in 2008-09. Foreign direct investment (FDI) in
India has increased from US $ 22.1 billion in 2006-07 to US $ 32.4 billion in
2007-08. Portfolio investment has increased from US $ 7003 in 2006-07 to US $
29385 in 2007-08. The net capital inflows rose substantially to US $ 25.4 billion in
Q4 of 2007-08 from US $ 15.6 billion in Q4 of 2006-07. The major sources of
capital inflows were external commercial borrowings (ECBs), foreign direct
investment (FDI), short-term trade credit and overseas borrowings by the banks.
The share of ECBs in the total external debt increased from 4.54% in 2007 to
5.29% in 2008. Total external debt as percentage to gross domestic product
(GDP) increased from 18.50% in March 2007 to 18.86% in March 2008. Short-
term external debt as percentage to GDP increased from 2.88% in March 2007 to
3.78% in March 2008. Long-term external debt as percentage to GDP reduced
from 15.63% in March 2007 to 15.08% in March 2008. Capital account balance
as a percentage of GDP increased from 4.99 % in March 2006-07 to 9.21% in
March 2007-08. The foreign exchange reserves of India increased to US $ 309
billion in 2007-08 from US $ 199 billion in 2006-07.
******************
Unit 4: Reference Handouts/ BBM 505
Positive tidings about the Indian economy combined with a fast-growing market
have made India an attractive destination for foreign institutional investors (FIIs).
FIIs showed huge interest in 2007, pumping in the highest ever net investment of
US$ 17.2 billion in the equity markets and were instrumental in the Bombay
Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange (NSE) clocking record
index levels of over 20,000 and 6,000, respectively. In fact, during the year, FIIs
were net buyers in 10 out of 12 months, turning net sellers in the rest, primarily to
make up the losses on account of the sub-prime crisis in the US.
Out of the total net inflows, a whopping 70 per cent was invested through the
instruments of Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs), Qualified
Institutional Placements (QIPs), and initial public offerings (IPOs). Of these, in
the current year, all corporates in India raised around US$ 11-13 billion of
FCCBs, QIPs raised US$ 3.2 billion in 2007 and IPOs - India Inc has raised a
record US$ 12.41 billion through public issues --IPOs and FPOs--in the fiscal
2007-08. India's mobilisation of funds through public equity offerings more than
doubled this year as against US$ 5.94 billion mobilised in 2006-07, data
compiled by primary market tracking firm Prime shows. The remaining 30 per
cent was invested through overseas offers, preferential offers and conversion of
warrants. Of these, outstanding NRI deposits at end-March 2008, stood at US$
43.7 billion. Also, investments in securities have also gone up. Out of the US$
299.23 billion foreign currency assets as on 31 March 2008, US$ 103.56 billion
were invested in securities.
This surge in FII investment has led to the cumulative net investments by FII in to
Indian equities to total US$ 66.8 billion by the end of 2007, since December
1993, when FIIs were allowed to enter India.
This is a clear index of how bullish this category of investors has been on the
prospects of the Indian market.
Government Initiatives
FIIs are allowed to invest in the primary and secondary capital markets in India
through the portfolio investment scheme (PIS). Under this scheme, FIIs can
acquire shares/debentures of Indian companies through the stock exchanges in
India.
The ceiling for overall investment for FIIs is 24 per cent of the paid-up capital of
the Indian company, and limit is 20 per cent of the paid-up capital in the case of
public sector banks. The ceiling of 24 per cent for FII investment can be raised
up to sectoral cap/statutory ceiling, subject to the approval of the board and the
general body of the company passing a special resolution to that effect.
To further increase FII participation in the Indian market, the government and
SEBI have taken several measures:
Abstract:
The main aim of the Foreign Technology Collaboration in India is its
technological development. Efficiency and productivity of Indian industries can
be increased with use of improved technology through Foreign Technology
Collaborations.
Government Approval
The manufacturing and products should be compliant with the small scale
industries Proposals which involve previous trademark agreement, joint
ventures, technology transfer, etc In case of an extension of the foreign
technology collaboration agreements which had been automatically approved
earlier
Automatic Approval
The royalty paid is 1 % in case of domestic sales and 2 % in case of exports
as granted under automatic route for use of the trademark foreign collaborator
Globalization (or globalisation), although often described as the cause of much turbulence and change, is
in fact the umbrella term for the collective effect, the change itself. Globalization (i.e. the aggregate change
we observe in our factories, storefronts, indeed generally across our economies and lifestyles) is caused by
four fundamental forms of capital movement throughout the global economy. The four important capital
flows are:
The economic aspects stressed in globalization are trade, investment and migration. The globalization of
trade entails that human beings have greater access to an array of goods and services never seen before in
human history. From German cars, to Colombian coffee, from Chinese clothing, to Egyptian cotton, from
American music to Indian software, human beings may be able to purchase a wide range of goods and
services. The globalization of investment takes place through Foreign Direct Investment, where
multinational companies directly invest assets in a foreign country, or by indirect investment where
individuals and institutions purchase and sell financial assets of other countries. Free migration allows
individuals to find employment in jurisdictions where there are labor shortages.
Critics of free trade also contend that it may lead to the destruction of a country's native industry,
environment and/or a loss of jobs. Critics of international investment contend that by accepting these
financial schemes a country loses its economic sovereignty and may be forced to set policies that are
contrary to its citizen's interests or desires. Moreover, multinational companies that invest in a country may
also acquire too much political and economic power in relation to its citizens. Finally, migration may lead
to the exploitation of workers from a migrant country and the displacement of workers from a host country.
Critics of globalization also contend that different economic systems that either augment or supplant
globalization may maximize social welfare more efficiently and equitably.
The political aspects of globalization are evidenced when governments create international rules and
institutions to deal with issues such as trade, human rights, and the environment. Among the new
institutions and rules that have come to fruition as a result of globalization are the World Trade
Organization, the Euro currency, the North American Free Trade Agreement, to name a few. Whether a
government is to consciously open itself to cross-border links, is the central question of this aspect.
Social activist and non-profit organizations such as Amnesty International and Greenpeace are also
becoming more global in scope. Some of these organizations take issue with the economic and political
aspects of globalization as they fear that economic interests either subvert the nation state in its ability to
protect its citizens from economic exploitation, or support governments that violate the human rights of
their citizens.
Cultural global ties also grow through globalization as news ideas and fashions through trade, travel and
media move around the globe at lightning speed. Global brands such as Coca-Cola, Nike & Sony serve as
common reference to consumers all over the World. An individual in China enjoys the same soft drink as
an individual in Puerto Rico--at opposite ends of the globe. However, these ties may also cause strains: for
example Western Ideas of freedom of expression may clash with Islamic views on Religious tolerance. And
if not strains, critics contend this is really an imposition of cultural imperialism in order to preserve
economic interests.
The other aspect of globalization is the revolutionary change in technology, particularly in transport and
communication, which ostensibly creates a global village. In 1850 it took nearly a year to sail around the
World. Now you can fly around the world in a day, send an email anywhere almost instantly, or be part of
the 1.5 billion viewers watching the final match of the World Cup. Transportation costs have come down as
result of technological advances that make foreign markets more accessible to trade. Tuna caught in the
North Atlantic may be served the next day at a Sushi restaurant in Japan. Finally, billions of dollars in
assets and currencies are exchanged daily around the globe by electronic means at virtually no cost.
Globalization spreads everything.
History:
Since the word has both technical and political meanings, different groups will have differing
histories of "globalization". In general use within the field of economics and political economy,
however, it is a history of increasing trade between nations based on stable institutions that allow
firms in different nations to exchange goods and services with minimal friction.
The term "liberalization" came to mean the acceptance of the Neoclassical economic model which is based
on the unimpeded flow of goods and services between economic jurisdictions. This led to specialization of
nations in exports, and the pressure to end protective tariffs and other barriers to trade. The period of the
gold standard and liberalization of the 19th century is often called "The First Era of Globalization". Based
on the Pax Britannica and the exchange of goods in currencies pegged to specie, this era grew along with
industrialization. The theoretical basis was David Ricardo's work on Comparative advantage and Say's Law
of General equilibrium. In essence, it was argued that nations would trade effectively, and that any
temporary disruptions in supply or demand would correct themselves automatically. The institution of the
gold standard came in steps in major industrialized nations between approximately 1850 and 1880, though
exactly when various nations were truly on the gold standard is contentiously debated.
Globalization in the era since World War II has been driven by trade negotiation rounds, originally under
the auspices of GATT, which led to a series of agreements to remove restrictions on "free trade". The
Uruguay round led to a treaty to create the World Trade Organization or WTO, to mediate trade disputes.
Other bi- and trilateral trade agreements, including sections of Europe's Maastricht Treaty and the North
American Free Trade Agreement have also been signed in pursuit of the goal of reducing tariffs and
barriers to trade.
Some maintain that globalization is an imagined geography; that is, a political tool of ruling neo-liberalists,
who are attempting to use certain images and discourses of world politics to justify their political agendas.
Writers of books such as No Logo claim that by presenting a picture of a globalized world, the Bretton
Woods institutions can demand that countries open up their economies to liberalization under Structural
Adjustment Programmes that encourage governments to fund privatization programmes, ahead of welfare
and public services.
Characteristics:
Globalization / internationalisation has become identified with a number of trends, most of which
may have developed since World War II. These include greater international movement of
commodities, money, information, and people; and the development of technology, organizations,
legal systems, and infrastructures to allow this movement. The actual existence of some of these
trends is debated.
Economically
o Increase in international trade at a much faster rate than the growth in the world economy
o Increase in international flow of capital including foreign direct investment
o Creation of international agreements leading to organizations like the WTO and OPEC
o Development of global financial systems
o Increased role of international organizations such as WTO, WIPO, IMF that deal with
international transactions
o Increase of economic practices like outsourcing, by multinational corporations
Culturally
o Greater international cultural exchange,
o Spreading of multiculturalism, and better individual access to cultural diversity, for
example through the export of Hollywood and Bollywood movies. However, the
imported culture can easily supplant the local culture, causing reduction in diversity
through hybridization or even assimilation. The most prominent form of this is
Westernization, but Sinicization of cultures also takes place.
o Greater international travel and tourism
o Greater immigration, including illegal immigration
o Spread of local foods such as pizza, Chinese and Indian food/Pakistani Food to other
countries (often adapted to local taste)
o World-wide Fads and Pop Culture such as Pokemon, Sudoku, Numa Numa, Origami,
Idol series, YouTube, MySpace, and many others.
o Increasing usage of foriegn phrases. Example... "Amigo" and "Adios" are Spanish terms
many non-speaking spanish people in the US understand, Most Americans understand
some French, Spanish or Japanese without actually knowing the language.
Development of a global telecommunications infrastructure and greater transborder data flow,
using such technologies as the Internet, communication satellites and telephones
Increase in the number of standards applied globally; e.g. copyright laws and patents
Formation or development of a set of universal values
The push by many advocates for an international criminal court and international justice
movements (see the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice respectively).
It is often argued that even terrorism has undergone globalization, with attacks in foreign countries
that have no direct relation with the own country.
Barriers to international trade have been considerably lowered since World War II through international
agreements such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Particular initiatives carried out
as a result of GATT and the WTO, for which GATT is the foundation, have included:
Anti-globalization:
Critics of the economic aspects of globalization contend that it is not, as its proponents tend to imply,
an inexorable process that flows naturally from the economic needs of everyone. The critics typically
emphasize that globalization is a process that is mediated according to elite imperatives, and typically
raise the possibility of alternative global institutions and policies, which they believe address the moral
claims of poor and working classes throughout the globe, as well as environmental concerns in a more
equitable way. In terms of the controversial global migration issue, disputes revolve around both its
causes, whether and to what extent it is voluntary or involuntary, necessary or unnecessary Increase in
international flow of capital including foreign direct investment Critics of the economic aspects of
globalization contend that it is not, as its proponents tend to imply, an inexorable process that flows
naturally from the economic needs of everyone. The critics typically emphasize that globalization is a
process that is mediated according to elite imperatives, and typically raise the possibility of alternative
global institutions and policies, which they believe address the moral claims of poor and working
classes throughout the globe, as well as environmental concerns in a more equitable way. In terms of
the controversial global migration issue, disputes revolve around both its causes, whether and to what
extent it is voluntary or involuntary, necessary or unnecessary; and its effects, whether beneficial, or
socially and environmentally costly. Proponents tend to see migration simply as a process whereby
white and blue collar workers may go from one country to another to provide their services, while
critics tend to emphasize negative causes such as economic, political, and environmental insecurity, and
cite as one notable effect, the link between migration and the enormous growth of urban slums in
developing countries. According to "The Challenge of Slums," a 2003 UN-Habitat report, "the cyclical
nature of capitalism, increased demand for skilled versus unskilled labour, and the negative effects of
globalisation "in particular, global economic booms and busts that ratchet up inequality and distribute
new wealth unevenly" contribute to the enormous growth of slums.
Various aspects of globalization are seen as harmful by public-interest activists as well as strong state
nationalists. This movement has no unified name. "Anti-globalization" is the media's preferred term; it can
lead to some confusion, as activists typically oppose certain aspects or forms of globalization, not
globalization per se. Activists themselves, for example Noam Chomsky, have said that this name is
meaningless as the aim of the movement is to globalize justice. Indeed, the global justice movement is a
common name. Many activists also unite under the slogan "another world is possible", which has given rise
to names such as altermondialisme in French.
Economic arguments by fair trade theorists claim that unrestricted free trade benefits those with more
financial leverage (i.e. the rich) at the expense of the poor. Many "anti-globalization" activists see
globalization as the promotion of a corporatist agenda, which is intent on constricting the freedoms of
individuals in the name of profit. Some "anti-globalization" groups argue that globalization is necessarily
imperialistic, is one of the driving reasons behind the Iraq war and is forcing savings to flow into the
United States rather than developing nations; it can therefore be said that "globalization" is another term for
a form of Americanization, as it is believed by some observers that the United States could be one of the
few countries (if not the only one) to truly profit from globalization.
Some argue that globalization imposes credit-based economics, resulting in unsustainable growth of debt
and debt crises. The financial crises in Southeast Asia, that began in the relatively small, debt-ridden
economy of Thailand but quickly spread to Malaysia, Indonesia, South Korea and eventually was felt all
around the world, demonstrated the new risks and volatility in rapidly changing globalized markets. The
IMF's subsequent 'bailout' money came with conditions of political change (i.e. government spending
limits) attached and came to be viewed by critics as undermining national sovereignty in neo-colonialist
fashion. Anti-Globalization activists pointed to the meltdowns as proof of the high human cost of the
indiscriminate global economy.
Some "anti-globalization" activists object to the fact that the current "globalization" globalizes money and
corporations, but not people and unions. This can be seen in the strict immigration controls in nearly all
countries, and the lack of labour rights in many countries in the developing world.
Another more conservative camp opposed to globalization is state-centric nationalists who fear
globalization is displacing the role of nations in global politics and point to NGOs as encroaching upon the
power of individual nations. Some advocates of this warrant for anti-globalization are Pat Buchanan and
Jean-Marie Le Pen.
The movement is very broad, including church groups, national liberation factions, left-wing parties,
environmentalists, peasant unionists, anti-racism groups, anarchists, those in support of relocalization and
others. Most are reformist, (arguing for a more humane form of capitalism) while others are more
revolutionary (arguing for a more humane system than capitalism). Many have decried the lack of unity and
direction in the movement, but some such as Noam Chomsky have claimed that this lack of centralization
may in fact be a strength.
Protests by the global justice movement have forced high-level international meetings away from the major
cities where they used to be held, into remote locations where protest is impractical.
Pro-globalization (globalism):
Supporters of democratic globalization can be labelled pro-globalists. They consider that the first
phase of globalization, which was market-oriented, should be completed by a phase of building global
political institutions representing the will of world citizens. The difference with other globalists is
that they do not define in advance any ideology to orient this will, which should be left to the free
choice of those citizens via a democratic process.
Supporters of free trade point out that economic theories of comparative advantage suggest that free trade
leads to a more efficient allocation of resources, with all countries involved in the trade benefiting. In
general, this leads to lower prices, more employment and higher output.
Libertarians and other proponents of laissez-faire capitalism say higher degrees of political and economic
freedom in the form of democracy and capitalism in the developed world are both ends in themselves and
also produce higher levels of material wealth. They see globalization as the beneficial spread of liberty and
capitalism.
Critics argue that the anti-globalization movement uses anecdotal evidence to support their view and that
worldwide statistics instead strongly support globalization:
the percentage of people in developing countries living below US$1 (adjusted for inflation and
purchasing power) per day has halved in only twenty years, although some critics argue that more
detailed variables measuring poverty should instead be studied.
Life expectancy has almost doubled in the developing world since WWII and is starting to close
the gap to the developed world where the improvement has been smaller. Child mortality has
decreased in every developing region of the world. Income inequality for the world as a whole is
diminishing.
Democracy has increased dramatically from almost no nation with universal suffrage in 1900 to
62.5% of all nations in 2000.
The proportion of the world's population living in countries where per-capita food supplies are less
than 2,200 calories (9,200 kilojoules) per day decreased from 56% in the mid-1960s to below 10%
by the 1990s.
Between 1950 and 1999, global literacy increased from 52% to 81% of the world. Women made
up much of the gap: Female literacy as a percentage of male literacy has increased from 59% in
1970 to 80% in 2000.
The percentage of children in the labor force has fallen from 24% in 1960 to 10% in 2000.
There are similar trends for electric power, cars, radios, and telephones per capita, as well as the
proportion of the population with access to clean water.
However, some of these improvements may not be due to globalization, or may be possible without the
current form of globalization or its negative consequences, to which the global justice movement objects.
Some pro-capitalists are also critical of the World Bank and the IMF, arguing that they are corrupt
bureaucracies controlled and financed by states, not corporations. Many loans have been given to dictators
who never carried out promised reforms, instead leaving the common people to pay the debts later. They
thus see too little capitalism, not too much. They also note that some of the resistance to globalization
comes from special interest groups with conflicting interests, like Western world unions. However, there
are also many anti-capitalist who are against the World Bank and the IMF because they believe they are too
capitalist and only in interests for profit.
Others, such as Senator Douglas Roche, O.C., simply view globalization as inevitable and advocate
creating institutions such as a directly-elected United Nations Parliamentary Assembly to exercise
oversight over unelected international bodies.
Other uses:
"Globalization" can mean:
Globalism, if the concept is reduced to its economic aspects, can be said to contrast with economic
nationalism and protectionism. It is related to laissez-faire capitalism and neoliberalism.
It shares a number of characteristics with internationalization and is often used interchangeably,
although some prefer to use globalization to emphasize the erosion of the nation-state or national
boundaries.
Making connections between places on a global scale. Today, more and more places around the
world are connected to each other in ways that were previously unimaginable. In geography, this
process is known as complex connectivity, where more and more places are being connected in
more and more ways. Arjun Appadurai identified five types of global connectivity:
o Ethnoscapes: movements of people, including tourists, immigrants, refugees, and
business travellers.
o Financescapes: global flows of money, often driven by interconnected currency markets,
stock exchanges, and commodity markets.
o Ideoscapes: the global spread of ideas and political ideologies. For example, Green Peace
has become a worldwide environmental movement.
o Mediascapes: the global distribution of media images that appear on our computer
screens, in newspapers, television, and radio.
o Technoscapes: the movement of technologies around the globe. For example, the Green
Revolution in rice cultivation introduced western farming practices into many developing
countries.
Although Appadurai's taxonomy is highly contestable, it does serve to show that globalization is
much more than economics on a global scale.
In its cultural form, globalization has been a label used to identify attempts to erode the national
cultures of Europe, and subsume them into a global culture whose members will be much easier to
manipulate through mass media and controlled governments. In this context, massive legal or
illegal immigration has been allowed, mainly in European countries.
The formation of a global village closer contact between different parts of the world, with
increasing possibilities of personal exchange, mutual understanding and friendship between
"world citizens", and creation of a global civilization.
Economic globalization there are four aspects to economic globalization, referring to four different
flows across boundaries, namely flows of goods/services, i.e. 'free trade' (or at least freer trade),
flows of people (migration), of capital, and of technology. A consequence of economic
globalization is increasing relations among members of an industry in different parts of the world
(globalization of an industry), with a corresponding erosion of national sovereignty in the
economic sphere. The IMF defines globalization as the growing economic interdependence of
countries worldwide through increasing volume and variety of cross-border transactions in goods
and services, freer international capital flows, and more rapid and widespread diffusion of
technology (IMF, World Economic Outlook, May, 1997). The World Bank defines globalization
as the "Freedom and ability of individuals and firms to initiate voluntary economic transactions
with residents of other countries".
In the field of management, globalization is a marketing or strategy term that refers to the
emergence of international markets for consumer goods characterized by similar customer needs
and tastes enabling, for example, selling the same cars or soaps or foods with similar ad
campaigns to people in different cultures. This usage is contrasted with internationalization which
describes the activities of multinational companies dealing across borders in either financial
instruments, commodities, or products that are extensively tailored to local markets. Globalization
also means cross-border management activities or development processes to adapt to the
emergence of a globalized market or to seek and realize benefit from economies of scale or scope
or from cross-border learning among different country-based organizations.
In the field of software, globalization is a technical term that combines the development processes
of internationalization and localization.
Many, such as participants in the World Social Forum, use the term "corporate globalization" or
"global corporatization" to highlight the impact of multinational corporations and the use of legal
and financial means to circumvent local laws and standards, in order to leverage the labor and
services of unequally-developed regions against each other.
The spread of capitalism from developed to developing nations.
"The concept of globalisation refers both to the compression of the world and the intensification of
consciousness of the world as a whole" - Benedikt Kiesenhofer
Measurement of globalization:
To what extent a nation-state or culture is globalized in a particular year has until most recently been
measured employing simple proxies like flows of trade, migration, or foreign direct investment. A
more sophisticated approach to measuring globalization is the recent index calculated by the Swiss
think tank KOF. The index measures the three main dimensions of globalization: economic, social,
and political. In addition to three indices measuring these dimensions, an overall index of
globalization and sub-indices referring to actual economic flows, economic restrictions, data on
personal contact, data on information flows, and data on cultural proximity is calculated. Data are
available on a yearly basis for 122 countries. According to the index, the world's most globalized
country is the USA, followed by Sweden, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Luxembourg. The least
globalized countries according to the KOF-index are Togo, Chad and the Central African Republic.
Global Falsehoods: How the World Bank and the UNDP Distort the Figures on Global Poverty:
According to Professor Michel Chossudovsky ,until the 1998 financial meltdown ("black September"
1998), the World economy was said to be booming under the impetus of the "free market" reforms.
Without debate or discussion, so-called "sound macro-economic policies" (meaning the gamut of budgetary
austerity, deregulation, downsizing and privatisation) continue to be heralded as the key to economic
success and poverty alleviation. In turn, both the World Bank and the United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP) have asserted authoritatively that economic growth in the late 20th Century has
contributed to a reduction in the levels of World poverty. According to the UNDP, "the progress in
reducing poverty over the 20th century is remarkable and unprecedented... The key indicators of human
development have advanced strongly."
The World Bank framework deliberately departs from all established concepts and procedures (eg. by the
US Bureau of Census or the United Nations) for measuring poverty. It consists in arbitrarily setting a
"poverty threshold" at one dollar a day per capita. It then proceeds (without even measuring) to deciding
that population groups with a per capita income "above one dollar a day" are "non-poor".
The World Bank "methodology" conveniently reduces recorded poverty without the need for collecting
country-level data. This "subjective" and biased assessment is carried out irrespective of actual conditions
at the country level. The one dollar a day procedure is absurd: the evidence amply confirms that population
groups with per capita incomes of 2, 3 or even 5 dollars a day remain poverty stricken (ie. unable to meet
basic expenditures of food, clothing, shelter, health and education).
The data is then tabulated in glossy tables with "forecasts" of declining levels of global poverty into the
21st Century. These World Bank "forecasts" of poverty are based on an assumed rate of growth of per
capita income, --ie. growth of the latter implies pari passu a corresponding lowering of the levels of
poverty. Its a numerical game!
Based on the above criteria, the UNDP Human Development Group comes up with estimates of human
poverty which are totally inconsistent with country-level realties. The HPI for Colombia, Mexico or
Thailand, for instance, is of order of 10-11 percent (see Table 1). The UNDP measurements point to
"achievements" in poverty reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and India which are totally at
odds with country-level data.
The human poverty estimates put forth by the UNDP portray an even more distorted and misleading pattern
than those of the World Bank). For instance, only 10.9 percent of Mexico's population are categorised by
the UNDP as "poor". Yet this estimate contradicts the situation observed in Mexico since the mid-1980s:
collapse in social services, impoverishment of small farmers and the massive decline in real earnings
triggered by successive currency devaluations. A recent OECD study confirms unequivocally the mounting
tide of poverty in Mexico since the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
In the West, the methods for measuring poverty have been based on minimum levels of household spending
required to meet essential expenditures on food, clothing, shelter, health and education. In the United
States, for instance, the Social Security Administration (SSA) in the 1960s had set a "poverty threshold "
which consisted of "the cost of a minimum adequate diet multiplied by three to allow for other expenses".
This measurement was based on a broad consensus within the US Administration.
Conversely, if the US Bureau of Census methodology (based on the cost of meeting a minimum diet) were
applied to the developing countries, the overwhelming majority of the population would be categorised as
"poor". While this exercise of using "Western standards" and definitions has not been applied in a
systematic fashion, it should be noted that with the deregulation of commodity markets, retail prices of
essential consumer goods are not appreciably lower than in the US or Western Europe. The cost of living in
many Third World cities is higher than in the United States.
Moreover, household budget surveys for several Latin American countries suggest that at least sixty
percent of the population the region does not meet minimum calorie and protein requirements. In Peru, for
instance, following the 1990 IMF sponsored "Fujishock", 83 percent of the Peruvian population according
to household census data were unable to meet minimum daily calorie and protein requirements. The
prevailing situation in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia is more serious where a majority of the
population suffer from chronic undernourishment.
The investigation on poverty by both organizations take official statistics at face value. It is largely an
"office based exercise" conducted in Washington and New York with few insights or awareness of "what is
happening in the field". The 1997 UNDP Report points to a decline of one third to a half in child mortality
in selected countries of Sub-Saharan despite the slide in State expenditures and income levels. What it fails
to mention, however, is that the closing down of health clinics and the massive lay-offs of health
professionals (often replaced by semi-illiterate health volunteers) responsible for compiling mortality data
has resulted in a de facto decline in recorded mortality. The IMF-World Bank sponsored macro-economic
reforms have also led to a collapse in the process of data collection.
Table 1
THE UNDP'S HUMAN POVERTY INDEX
Selected Developing Countries Country Poverty Level
(percent of the population below the poverty line)
Trinidad and Tobago 4.1
Mexico 10.9
Thailand 11.7
Colombia 10.7
Philippines 17.7
Jordan 10.9
Nicaragua 27.2
Jamaica 12.1
Iraq 30.7
Rwanda 37.9
Papua New Guinea 32.0
Nigeria 41.6
Zimbabwe 17.3
Table 2
POVERTY IN SELECTED G7 COUNTRIES, BY NATIONAL STANDARDS
Source:
*US Bureau of Census,
The arguments of the anti-globalization movement lead us back into the crushing embrace of Big Brother
the nation state, which has never been the defender of the local community and the protector of the
individual person.
The "think globally act locally" message has been turned upside down by the anti-globalizers who act
globally (from Seattle to Prague, from Gothenburg to Genova) while thinking along very narrow and short-
term lines. The main focus should not be on the MacDonaldÕs outlets of this world but on the MacArthur
(the generals) and the McCarthy (the politicians); otherwise they will always prevail with their nefarious
interventions even after hamburgers and fast food have gone out of fashion.
Globalism is, for many people, the only way to escape political oppression, economic poverty, cultural
alienation. However, even this grand vision of emancipation and progress connected to globalism does not
represent the core of the matter, being still full of limitations and distortions linked to a discourse based on
globalism versus antiglobalism.
The real issue is not globalization vs. anti-globalization but liberation vs. subjection, especially with
reference to the nation state with its protected cohort of monopolistic producers and parasitic consumers
(the bureaucracy, the army, etc.).What is at stake is not globalism or localism but freedom and nothing else
than freedom.
We do not need to pile up data or write long treatises to show that freedom is a human value and servitude
is not, that the earth belongs to humankind for the care of present and future generations and is not the
closed territorial racket of national rulers and their corrupt or credulous appendages.
For this reason, whenever and wherever a debate on globalization takes place, after listening carefully to
the various positions and arguments put forward and having worked out in our mind all the possible
implications, we should sincerely ask ourselves: where is freedom? who is really advocating freedom? how
can we better develop freedom?
According to the answers we should know where we stand.
The debate about the impacts of the terrorist network on the development of globalization is much more
controversial. In this sphere two main conflicting ideas can be distinguished: there are authors who claim
that terrorism would slow down globalization processes and there are ones who argue exactly the opposite
that it would speed up the processes of integration worldwide. The arguments for the strengthening of
globalization received even more credibility because of the events that followed the September 11 attacks
and the rhetoric that president Bush’s administration adopted after them. Enhancing the free trade was one
of the main arguments of this rhetoric. In fact the processes of globalization seemed to advance after these
events as United States received a possibility to both assert its leadership and transfer the blame over the
world recession on the works of terrorists.
Such optimistic views, however, can hardly be sustained in the view of the current events. While it is rather
clear that the processes of economic globalization will not halt, the form it takes is far from the one that has
been dreamed of by the various activists of global civil society organizations. Hence, it is very doubtful that
the terrorist attacks and the need to respond to the terrorist threat would greatly enhance the creation and
development of the global civil society
Conclusions:
Various debates about the mutual impact of terrorism and globalization show the multifaceted relationship
between the two phenomena. Summarizing briefly the arguments exposed so far it could be said that
globalization provides means for the global terrorism by its technological advances; it also gives causes for
such a terrorism primarily by creating great discrepancies in the economic conditions in various countries
of the world. While analyzing the relationship between globalization and causes of terrorism, it is also
perceived as a resistance to the domination of the United States in the world. The world itself, in words of
Baudrillard, resists domination. These arguments lead are connected with the idea that terrorism became
truly a global actor, which is confirmed by the fact that such organizations as al Qaeda achieve truly global
dimensions. It uses global networks and advances causes that are deeply connected with the way the
politics of the world function.
On the other hand, the analysts who promote the idea that because of the threat of terrorism the process of
globalization will be just advanced also have important arguments. The process of globalization does not
seem to have stopped and the form of it is not much different from the one experienced before the
September 11th attacks either. To the contrary, the assertion of hegemony by United States has recently
reached rather impressive dimensions. The world is gathered around the United States in its fight against
terrorism, which also means the affirmation of its dominant position in the world.
However, contrary to the more optimistic views of the global civil society activists and some social
scientists, there is not much multilateralism and mutual cooperation between the states and societies to be
seen. In this sense, the process of globalization was not advanced by the terrorist attacks and no sense of a
need of multilateral cooperation between the countries for countering the threat of terrorism was created.
As a final point, it could be argued that terrorism has an effect on globalization, but exactly a reverse one
than intended, that instead of weakening the position of hegemonic power, it actually reinforces it. Hence,
again, it could be argued that we are spinning in some kind of vicious circle where the shape of
globalization, which we witness, engenders terrorism and terrorism itself enforces exactly this kind of
globalization based on a hegemony of the United States.
Author’s Note:
I have tried to put forward my humble effort in dealing with the particular concept of Globalisation. If I
have committed any mistakes , I beg to be forgiven as it is only an endeavour. I am indebted to the various
authors from the Internet from whom I have taken the various concepts and references, a list of which is
given below in the footnote. I am also indebted to Sri Ashis Mallick, Teacher- in -Charge , and all the
Professors of Sarsuna Law College ( Professors Kana Mukherjee, Anindita Adhikari, Sumana
Roychowdhury, Atashi Roy Khaskel, Ishtiaque Ahmed and Surekha Somabalan) for helping and
encouraging me in writing this article.
Endnotes
1.see, for example, Weinberg, Davis. 1989. Introduction to Political Terrorism. New York, p.19
2.Laqueur, Walter. 1987. The Age of Terrorism. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
3.see, for example, Guelke, Adrian. 1995. The age of terrorism and the international political system.
London: I.B.Tauris, p.2-3
4.Laclau, Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy : towards a radical democratic politics. London:
Verso.
5.Schmid, Jongman. 1988. Political terrorism: a new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases,
theories, and literature. Amsterdam: North Holland, Transaction Books, p.28
6.Crenshaw Martha. 1983. "Reflections on the Effects of Terrorism" in Crenshaw, Martha, ed. Terrorism,
Legitimacy and Power. The Consequences of Political Violence. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.,
p.2
7."... we know intuitively that this is a revolution and that that is only a riot, but we could not say what riot
and revolution are; we will speak of them without really knowing them. Could we define them? That would
be arbitrary or impossible. (Veyne, Paul. 1984. Writing history: an essay on epistemology. Middletown,
Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, p.132).
8.Chomsky, Noam. 2001. "September 11th and Its Aftermath: Where is the World Heading?" in
http://www.infoshop.org/news6/chomsky_india_lecture.html
9.Scholte, Jan Aart. 2000. Globalization: a critical introduction. New York: St.Martin’s Press. p.44-46
10. http://www.marxists.org/francais/marx/works/1848/01/km18480107.htm.
11. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report, 1997, New York, 1997, p. 2.)
12. For a methodological review on the measurement of poverty see Jan Drewnowski, The Level of living
Index, United Nations Institute for Social Research and Development (UNRISD), Geneva, 1965. See also
the extensive research on poverty thresholds conducted by the US Bureau of the Census.
13. See World Bank, World Development Report, 1990, Washington DC, 1990.
14. See World Development Report, 1997, table 9.2, chapter 9.
15. Ibid., chapter 9, table 9.2.
16. Ibid., p. 5.