SDG Briefing Note 1 - National and Global Monitoring
SDG Briefing Note 1 - National and Global Monitoring
1 United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable 4 https://undg.org/2030-agenda/mainstreaming-2030-agenda/
Development. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1, 21 October 2015: 5 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/vnrs/
http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E 6 http://www.regionalcommissions.org/regional-forums-on-sustainable-
2 UNICEF (2018) Strategic Plan 2018-2021: https://www.unicef.org/publications/ development/
index_102552.html 7 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/hlpf
3 UNICEF (2018) Progress for every child in the SDG era: https://data.unicef.org/
resources/progress-for-every-child-2018/
SDG briefing note #1
National and global monitoring of
child-related SDG indicators
The UNICEF Data & Analytics Section has been actively involved
in providing technical support and advice to the IAEG-SDG on the
development, collection, analysis and reporting of child-related SDG
indicators at national and global levels and calling for a stronger
focus on disaggregation.
8 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/iaeg-sdgs/
9 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/iaeg-sdgs/members/
10 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/
11 https://undocs.org/A/RES/71/313
12 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/iaeg-sdgs/tier-classification/
13 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/Working-Group-ToR--SDMX.pdf
14 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/Working-Group-ToR--GeoSpatial.pdf
15 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/Working-Group-ToR--Interlinkages.pdf
SDG briefing note #1
National and global monitoring of
child-related SDG indicators
Table 1: UNICEF is custodian or co-custodian for 17 SDG global Supporting national target setting
indicators (highlighted in bold) and monitoring
SDG GLOBAL INDICATOR16 UNICEF SDG INDICATOR BRIEFING The 2030 Agenda states that the SDG targets are ‘global in nature
NOTE
and universally applicable, taking into account different national
1.2.1 National poverty line Briefing note #2 realities, capacities and levels of development and respecting
Child poverty
national policies and priorities’17. Global targets are therefore
1.2.2 Multi-dimensional poverty Briefing note #2 considered aspirational, with each Government setting its own
Child poverty
national targets ‘guided by the global level of ambition but taking
2.2.1 Stunting Briefing note #3 account of national circumstances’. It encourages Member States
Nutritional status to develop as soon as possible ambitious national responses to the
2.2.2 Wasting/overweight Briefing note #3 overall implementation of this Agenda. Specifically it calls on each
Nutritional status government to: a) decide how the SDGs should be incorporated into
3.1.1 Maternal mortality Briefing note #4 national planning processes, policies and strategies; b) set their own
Maternal mortality and skilled national targets guided by the global level of ambition, but taking
attendant at birth into account national circumstances; and c) in the implementation of
3.1.2 Skilled attendant at Briefing note #4 the Agenda build on existing commitments and in accordance with
birth Maternal mortality and skilled international human rights standards for the benefit of all18.
attendant at birth
In all cases the localisation of global SDG targets and indicators UNICEF has a strong track record of working in partnership with
within national policies, plans and strategies requires an in-depth other agencies to support both government and non-government
analysis of existing national data to determine the baseline and partners to collect robust data and conduct rigorous analysis of
identify data gaps. National targets should be time bound, with critical indicators of child health and welfare. Continued support
clearly defined indicators and national sources of data to be used will be critical to consolidate the gains made to date and to enable
to quantify progress. Operational definitions should be developed national authorities and development partners to respond to new
for key concepts such as ‘universal’, and the most relevant types and increasing demands for data.
of data disaggregation should be clearly identified. Where national
standards, for example for service coverage or health outcomes,
differ from international standards these should also be clearly Monitoring progress for every child in the
specified to inform comparison across countries. Specific concerns
SDG era
relating to measurement and monitoring of individual child-related
indicators are discussed in briefing notes #2-15. As stated above, related to the 232 global SDG indicators, UNICEF
has identified 35 that most directly concern children and will be the
major focus of UNICEF’s efforts to monitor and report on ‘progress
for every child’ during the SDG era20. These include the 17 global
UNICEF support to monitoring progress SDG indicators for which UNICEF has been identified as the official
for children in 2030 agenda custodian or co-custodian for the purposes of global reporting which
UNICEF’s support to monitoring SDGs related to children is based are discussed in more detail in subsequent briefing notes.
on its mandate in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) to
work with Member States in monitoring the progressive realization The relation of child-related indicators to official SDG indicators is
of child rights. Legitimacy also comes from UNICEF’s activities in complicated. There are SDG indicators which have a broad scope,
more than 190 countries including support to governments and but UNICEF wants to measure the child-related elements (e.g.
development partners in every region to collect, analyse and use UNICEF monitors child poverty, but the SDG indicator is for poverty
data to inform policies and programmes designed to save lives and disaggregated by age. Other indicators are composite, which
help children realize their full potential. UNICEF has established UNICEF breaks into separate indicators (such e.g. HIV infections for
extensive global databases and is committed to supporting Member children under five, and for teens – the formal SDG indicator lumps
States to monitor progress for children in the 2030 Agenda by these together). So the 35 child-related global SDG indicators can
developing and testing new indicators and methods and supporting be further, separated and disaggregated to highlight the children’s
their collection and analysis to inform national and global monitoring issues.
of progress for every child.
Of those 35, how many are UNICEF Strategic Plan indicators? For
UNICEF has played a leading role in the development of new how many is UNICEF custodian (or co-custodian)? How many are
standards and data collection methods for monitoring child well- collected in MICS? The answers are in the following diagram.
being. Many of the measurement techniques developed by UNICEF
and its partners during the MDG period have now been integrated
within the SDG global indicator framework. These are discussed in
more detail in subsequent briefing notes relating to specific SDG
targets and indicators and include: enhanced methods for estimating
child mortality based on limited data, techniques for integrating data
household survey and administrative data to estimate immunisation
coverage, new household survey modules on child discipline, ECD,
child and adult functioning, child learning assessments, water quality
testing and migratory status, and new methods for measuring multi-
dimensional child poverty.