0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views23 pages

The Sun Charts How The Sun Works 1979

How to read time from the sun shade

Uploaded by

vagabondusfelix
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views23 pages

The Sun Charts How The Sun Works 1979

How to read time from the sun shade

Uploaded by

vagabondusfelix
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23
51: Passive Solar Energy Book. Mazria. Rodale Press Em. Pa. USA 1979 0-87857-260-0 The Sun Charts How the Sun Works For our purposes, it is convenient to assume that the earth is stationary and the sun is in motion around the earth. Figure V-1 lists the angle (declination) of the sun above (+) or below (—) the equator, on the twentieth of each month, as seen from the earth. From the Northern Hemisphere, you can see that the sun lingers at its highest position in the sky for three months during the sum- mer, then moves very quickly through fall towards winter, where it appears low in the sky for another three months. In order to understand and be responsive to the effects of the sun on the location and design of places, it is necessary to know, at any given moment, the sun’s position in the sky. This information is necessary in order to calculate solar heat gain, and to locate buildings, outdoor spaces, interior room arrange- ments, windows, shading devices, vegetation and solar collectors. The Cylindrical Sun Chart The Cylindrical Sun Chart, which is developed here, provides an easy-to- understand and convenient way to predict the sun’s movement across the sky as seen from any point in the world between 28° and 56°NL. The chart is a vertical projection of the sun’s path as seen from earth. It could be said, then, that the Sun Chart is an earth-based view of the sun’s movement across the skydome. 267 JUNE: JULY/ MAY AUG/APR SEPT/MAR OCT/FEB NOV/JAN DEC The table below lists approximately how far above or below the equator the sun is on the twentieth day of each month. 20th of Jan. Feb. Mar, Apr. May June july Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. ~23 Fig. V-t The sun as it appears from earth on the twentieth day of each month, 268 The following sequence is a description of how a sun chart is developed. It is included here to provide you with a visual understanding of the sun’s movement across the skydome. Two coordinates are needed to locate the position of the sun in the sky. They are called the altitude and azimuth (also called the bearing angle). ides be X= ALTITUDE angle Y= AZIMUTH angle Fig. V-2; Altitude and azimuth angles. 269 Altitude . Solar altitude is the angle measured between the horizon and the position of the sun above the horizon, The horizontal lines on the chart represent altitude angles in 10° increments above the horizon. eS 3 GP i & 48 8 Fig. V-3: Altitude angle. 270 2 Azimuth (bearing angle) Solar azimuth is the angle along the horizon of the position of the sun, measured to the east or west of true south, Fig, V-4: Azimuth angle. 277 Skydome (sky vault) The skydome is the visible hemisphere of sky, above the horizon, in all direc- tions, The grid on the chart represents the vertical and horizontal angles of the whole skydome, It is as if there were a clear dome around the observer, and then the chart were peeled off of this dome,* stretched out and laid flat. SUN CHART Fig. V-5: Skydome, In reality this is not possible. The intention of the illustration is to present you with a visual image of the skydome projected onto a Pat sheet. 272 Sun’s Position Once the altitude and azimuth angles are known, the sun can be located at any position in the sky. , Fig. V-6: Sun's position. 273 Sun’s Path By connecting the points of the location of the sun, at different times through- out the day, the sun’s path for that day can be drawn. Fig, V-7: Sun's path, 274 Monthly Paths Thus, we can plot the sun’s path for any day of the year. The lines shown represent the sun’s path for the twentieth day of each month. The sun’s path is longest during the summer months when it reaches its highest altitude, rising and setting with the widest azimuth angle from true south, During the winter months the sun is much lower in the sky, rising and setting with the narrowest azimuth angles from true south. Fig. V-8: Monthly paths. Times of Day Finally, if we connect the times of day on each sun path we get a heavy dotted line which represents the hours of the day. This completes the Cylindrical Sun Chart, Fig. V-9: Times of day. 276 Solar Home Book. Anderson, Riordan. Cheshire Bks USA 1976. 0-917352-01-7. Solar Position Most people have probably noticed that the sun is higher in the sky in snmmer than in winter. Some also redlize that it rises south of due east in winter and north of due cast in summer. Bach day the sun travels i a circular path across the sky, reaching its highest point at noon, As winter proceeds into spting and summer, this citcular path moves higher in the sky. ‘The sun rises earlier in the day and secs ‘aver, ‘The actual position of the sun in the sky depends upon the laticude of the observer ‘Acnoon on March 21 and September 23, the vernal and autumnal equinoxes, the stin is directly overhead at the equator. At 40°N latitude, however, is angle above the horizon is 50° ('= 90° —"40°), By oon on June 22, the summer solstice in the Northern Heri= sphere, the sun is directly overhead at the Tropic of Cancer, 234°N latitude, Its angle above the horizon at 40°N is 7334" (= 90" + 234° — 40°), the highest it gets at this latitude, AU noon on December 22, the sun is directly overhead at the Tropic of Capricorn, and its angle above the horizon at 40°N Intitude is only 263°. ‘A more extet description ot the sun's position is needed for most applications. fr the language of teigonometty, this position is, expressed by the values of wo angles—the solar altitude and the sola: azimuth, The solar altitude 6 is measured up fram the horizon to the sun, while the solar azimuth @ is the angular deviation from true south. These angles need not be excessively mysterious—you can make a rough measure~ iment of them with your own body. Stand facing the sun with one hand pointing toward ie and the other pointing de south. Now drop the first hacd so that it poinzs to the horizon directly below the sun. The angle that your atm drops is the solar altitude @ and the angle between your arms in the final position is the solar azimath ¢. Much better accuracy can be obtained with bercer instruments, but the measurement process is essentially the same. ‘The solar alticude and azinvuth can be cal- culated for any day, time, and latitude. For 40°N latitude (Philadelphia, for example), meorre oF. eons, Jaa ime aa une 22° SEPT 23 ‘The carch's elliptical path aroend ehe un. The sit of the carth’s axis rests in the seasons of the year wwe oF Day winter = SOLSTICE ‘The sun's daily path across the shy. The sm is higher in the sky in summer than in Winter duc to the Ut of the earth's axis. Measuring the sun’s position. The solar altrude @ is the angle between the ‘sun and the horizon, and the azimuth is measured from true south, the values of @ and ¢ are given at each hour for the 21st day of each month in the accompanying table. Note that ¢ is always zero at solar noon and that # varies ftom 26.6" at noon on December 21 to 73.5° at rnoon on June 21. You can find similar data itudes 24°N, 32°N, 48°N, 56°N, and APN in the tables titled “Clear Day Insolation appendix also shows you how to calculate these angles directly for any day, time, and latitude. ‘SOLAR POSITIONS FOR 40°N LATITUDE races [nes] a1] rata [ora yn ai] tn | ao] ep] on woe yal ate w]e az 4 usar [art vf tate aa Par | aee 79 az 4 953 | 10506 | 108 295 Tal ara} aa | ane [ies | 280 | 260 ws | ua] a5 a2 4 121 | 902 | 9s | 966 | 99.7 soo | 902 | 72.3 el alacre] or] ua) 22s | 30s Pose | are yor | 22s] so] a | ss a2 al 555] ore | 696 | 795 | on | 907 199 | 6| ono | ss | 520 ara| ces] ar] wa] aa} aca | wee aie | 28 | 205] 0 | no zi o| 4x0 | 4n7 | sza | or2 | 760 | wor oro | s73| we | ar | aio ye | al Atte) 28] sea] ate | sia | ara | soe] soa] nia | ae] see] exo | 207 Az o| 309 | 354 | sue | sie} ooo | os | our | 521 | axe | 35.6 | 0 | aor ALT a mee | 3x9] a7 | se? | 52 | oa | 067 | 393 | a77 | a6 | ans | asa tm] tT aa of iso] ims | 226 | 292 | sri | sig] srs | 297 | oe | ant | 61 | as2 Treon| ALTA] 300] 382] soo} me] roo] m5] ros] 623 | soo] ass | 402 | 266 azia[ oo] oo| ao] oo] oo} oo] oo] oo| oof oo| oo] oo NTIS, Aki @¢ mene om hc hon ndavimue Pee meme Gomer uh Arg th io dep and wok SOURCE Kon” Capon LAR ANGLES ‘Appendix 1.1 ‘The sun’s position in the sky is described by two angular measurements, the solar altitude @ and the solar azimuth $. As explained in Chapter 3, the solar altitude is the angle of the sun above the horizon. The azimuth is its angular deviation from true south. The exact calculation of # and ¢ depends upon three variables the latitude L, the deciination 8, and the hour angle H. Lacitude is the angular distance of the observer north oF south of the equatorit can bbe read ftom any good mip. Declination is a measure of how fat north ‘or south of the equator the sun has moved. At the summer solstice 4 = +234, while at the wincer solstice 5 = -234° in the Northern Hemisphere; at both equinoxes, 6 = 0°. This qnantity varies from month to month and can be read directly from the graph below. TEN FEE Wan AP WAY HN UL AS SPORT WO DEE DECLINATION OF THE SUN ‘The hour angle H depends on Local Solar Time, which is the time that would be read from a sundial oriented south. Solar Time is measured from solar noon~the morsent wher the sun is highest in the sky. At different times of the vear, the lengths of solar days (measnted from solar noon to soler noon) are slightly different from days measured by a dock running at 2 uniform rate, Local Solar Time is calculated taking this difference into account. There is also a correction if the obsetver is not on the standard time meridian for his time zone, ‘To correct local standard time (read from an accurate ciock) to Local Solat Time, chree steps are necessary: 41) daylight savings time isin effect, subtract one hour. 2)Determine the longitude of the locality and the longitude of the standard time meridian (75° for Eastern ST, 90° for Ceniral ST, 105° for Mountain ST, 120° for Pacific ST, 135° for Yukon ST, 150° for Alaska-Hawaii ST). Multiply the difference in longitudes by 4 minutes/degree. IF the locality is cast of the standard metidian, add the correction minutes; if it’s west, suberact them. 3) Add the equation of time (from the next graph) for the date in question, The result is the Local Solar Time. ‘Once you know the Local Solar Time, you can obtain the hour angle H from: T= 0.25 x (number of minutes from solar noon). From the latitude L, declination 3 and hour angle H, the solar altitude 6 and azimuth ¢ follow after @ litle trigonometry: sin 6 = cos Lcos8 cosM + sin Lsin 8; sin § = cos § sin Fi/cos 9 Example: Determine the altitude and azimuth of the son in Abilene, ‘Texas on December 1, when it is 1:30 pm, (CST). First we need to calculete the Local Solar Time, It is not daytight savings time, so no correction for that is needed. Looking at a map we see that Abilene is on the 100°W meridian, or 10 degrees west of the standard meridian— 90°W. We snbtract the 4 x 10 = 40 minutes from local time: 1:30 — 0:40 12:50 p.m. From the equation of time for December 1, we mnst add about 11 minutes, 12:50 + 0:21 = 1:01 Local Solar ‘Time, or 61 minutes past solar noon. Consequently, the hour angle is H = 0.25 x 61 or about 15". The latitude of Abilene is tead from the same map: L = 32”, and the declination for December 1 is = —22* We have come thus far with maps, graphs, and the back of an envelope, but now we need a pocket calculator or a table of trigono- metric functions: €05(32" }cas(—22" Jeos(15*) + sin( 32° )sin(—22°) = 0.85 X 0.93 X 0.97 + 0.53 x (0.37) 0.76 0.20 = 0.56 Then 9 = aresin (0.56) = 34.12" above the horizon, Similaely: sin 9 = cost—22" )sin(15*)/008(34.12°) = (0.93 X 0.26)/0,83 = 0.29. Then ¢ = aresin(0.29) = 16.85" west of true south. At 1:30 p.m. on December 1 in Abilene Texas, the solar altitude is 34.12" and the azimuth is 16.85° west ni DES GAN FES MAR APR WAY GN JUL NOG SEP OGT NOW The total solar radiation is the sum of direct, diffuse, and reflected radiation. At present, a stitistical apptoach is the only reliable method of separating out the diffuse component of horizontal insolation. The full detail of this method is contained in an article by Liu and Jordan: we only summarize their results here. First we ascertain che ratio of the daily insolation on a horizontal surface (measured at a particular weather station) to the extraterrestrial radiation on another horizontal surface (outside the atmosphere). This ratia (usually called the percent of Extroterrestrial radiation, ot % ETR) can be determined from the National Weather Records Center; itis also given in the article by Liu and Jordan, With a knowledge of the % ETR, you can use the accomr panying graph to determine the percentage of diffuse radiation of a honzontal surface. Fot example, 50% ETR corresponds to 38% diffuse radiation and 62% direct radiation. g + PERCENT OF DIFFUSE RADIATION & a 10] 4. al 6 3 ry ra @ 70 2 PERCENT OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL RADIATION You are now prepared to convert the ditect and diffuse components of the horizontal insolation into the daily total insolation on south facing tilted or vertical surfaces. The conversion factor for the direct component Fy, depends on the Istitude, L, the tilt angle of the surface, @, and the sunset bour angles, wo and «', of the horizontal and tilted surfaces: hotizoatal surface: cosw =—tan L tan 6 silted surface; cose "= ~tan (L.—A)tan 8 where the dectination 5 is found from the graph on page 252 and B = 90" applies to vertical surfaces. Depending on the value of these ‘wo angles wand w, the calculation of F., is slightly different. Ife is fess than ws then cost =) sinw ~w cose eat ina ween Ico ‘is smaller than es, then Fy = SULA) y sinw een” cos. sin w —w 608 Fr ‘The direct component of the radiation on a tilted or vertical surface is T= Fy X Jp. where I, is the direct horizontal insolation. The trestment of diffuse and reflected radiation is a bit different ‘The diffuse tadiation is assumed to come uniformly from all corners of the sky, 30 one necd only determine the fraction of the sky exposed to a tilted surface and reduce the horizontal diffuse radiatic accordingly. The diffuse radiation on a surface silted at an angle @ is 1 Le cose rn where 1, is the daily horizontal diffuse radiation. The reflected radiation on a tilted surface is Yeox 45888 xa, et) where o is the reflectance of the horizontal surface. SOURCE: Li, BAVA. aad R. . Jordan. “AmubICY of Solar Fnengy for Fltate Solar Heat Cotctor.” in Zao Temgeruore kingheering Apphctions of Solar Krerg, cited by Wicharé Corda, New Yaris ASHRAE, 1947. RAPS. University of Cape Town. South Africa 1992. 0-7992-1435-3. Resource files / Theory and Methods / Equations for calculating the position af the sun 1 EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING THE POSITION OF THE SUN swe eee SE eA ES Nomenclature: ¢ latitude n Julian day number wo hour angle 6 ‘solar declination angle & solar zenith angle ¥ solar azimuth The apparent position of the sun in the sky can be defined by two angles: the solar zenith angle Oz, and the azimuth angie ‘p. is zero at solar noon, positive in the momings and negative in the afternoons. ‘The sun's position relative to the earth depends on the time of day, the time of year, and the latitude. The latitude $ is negative for the southern hemisphere. The time of year n is denoted by the Julian day number (1 to 365), ‘The hour angie of the sun « is defined in terms of the number of hours from solar noon. w changes by 15° every hour. Itis zero at solar noon, positive in the momings and negative in the attemoons. For a given time of day (solar time), @ = (noon - time} * 15° Solar declination angle The declination angle of the sun is the angle between the sun at solar noon and the equatorial plane. This varies from day to day. It is zero at the equinoxes, 23.45° at the June solstice and -23.45° at the December solstice. can be calculated as follows: 8 = 23.45° « sin (360° O sen at some non Solar zenith angle ‘The solar zenith angle can now be calculated: cos 0; = sin 8 sin @ + cos cos @ cos w forcos > 0 Azimuth angle ‘The azimuth angle tp is provided by 0s 6: sin @ - sin 8 cos p= sin @7 cos g RAPS Design Manual / September 1982 Appendix: Calculation of solar irradiation on inclined surfaces eee RO AEE ea Solar terms Dn = a . Gr = { = lo = Ret = m . Solar angles A = E = z = 8 - et = 8h = © = NOMENCLATURE diffuse radiation on the horizontal wim?) dittuse radiation on tilted plane (wim?) global Radiation on the horizontal (Wim?) direct radiation on plane normal to sun's rays (Wim?) normal extrat lo = 1367 Whe’ direct radiation on plane with solar incidence = 6 trial radiation relative air mass solar azimuth solar elevation solar zenith declination angte solar incidence angle on tilted plane solar incidence angle on horizontal hour angle Site dependent terms At An 6 ¢ o ezimuth of filted plane day number filt angle of plane from horizontal latitude (@ > 0 in southern hemisphere) albedo of surrounding ground cover Perez model variables FA, F2,b Fj ¢h ¢t Xh xt sky brightness parameters. costficiants describing sky brightness parameters ‘solid angles occupied by circumsolar zone and horizon band weighted by their average incidence on the slope the equivalent of a and b for the horizontal describes relative importance of direct radiation at the earth's surface Normalised horizontal diffuse radiation half angle of circumsolar zone fa = 25°) ‘term used in the calculation of ¢’ term used in the calculation of a’ term used in the calculation of c! ‘term used in the calculation of a’ ‘The radiation received by an inclined surface is different to that received on the horizontal for three reasons. Firstly, the direct component is altered because of the change in surface area projected ‘onto the plane normal to the sun's rays. Secondly an inclined surface will receive radiation reflected from the surrounding ground cover, Thirdly, the dif luse component changes as the fraction of the sky dome visible to the tilted surtace Is reduced. It is current practice to treat these three components independently. The direct component ‘The treatment of the direct component is relatively straightforward and error tree for flat surfaces. IF Lis the intansity of the solar radiation falling on a plane normal to the sun's rays, then the direct radiation, {p, falling on a plane where the solar incidence angle is ®, is given by le = leos 6 I @tis the solar incidence angle on the inclined plane and 6h is the solar incidence angle on the horizontal, then . fot = 160s & andilen = = cos Bh so lot = (60S 6r/ COS Oh) lon The ratio cos 0; / cos Gy may be written: cost; sind sin (A) + cos 8 cos ($i) cos w “cos én gin’ sin } + GOS 660s F.00s o where 8 = declination angle $ = latitude B = tiltof plane trom horizontal wo = hour angle ttis possible to repeat this calculation with data for each hour during the day and sum the results. The final figure represents the total direct radiation received during one day by the inclined plane. The reflected component ‘The model employed to estimate ground reflected radiation assumes that the surrounding ground cover reflects radiation isotropically. This assumption is valid when global radiation is composed primarily of diffuse radiation and/or where the ground cover is a perfectly diffuse reflector. Although there do exist anisotropic models, these should only be used under specific conditions, for example where a surface exhibits strong directional reflectance or where local obstructions to the horizon occur. For the isotropic model, the reffected component is given by: Ret = 056(1-cosp) Gh where Ret = reflected component ° = ground albedo 8 = itt of plane from horizontal Ga = global radiation on the horizontal The diffuse component The available models Estimation of the diffuse component of radiation received by an inclined plane is considered the largest Potential source of error. There are a number of different models which may be used to predict the diffuse component, Firstly, the isotropic model assumes that the intensity of the sky diffuse radiation is uniform over the entice ‘sky dome. Research has shown that the assumption of isotropy of the sky provides a good fit to empirical data at low intensity conditions found during overcast skies; however the model underestimates the amount ‘of solar radiation falling on tilted surfaces at higher solar intensities and in clear or partly clear sky situations where anisotropic conditions of circumsolar and horizon brightening are prevalent, Various anistropic modals have been developad to improve accuracy (Temps & Coulson, 1977; Klucher, 1979; Hay & McKay, 1985; and Perez et al, 1986). Comparisons of the performance of these models on two test data sets are presented in Perez (1987). The new version af the Peraz model has been shown to perform more accurately than other models for a large number of locations. For this reason the new enhanced form of the Perez model has been selectad to generate the diffuse radiation component. Although Southem African sky conditions, being mostly clear and bright, resemble the conditions under which the Perez model pertorms well, it has not yet been validated locally. Description of Enhanced Perez Modet The model is composed of two distinct elements: is ‘a geometric representation of the sky dome _ ii, @ parametric representation of the insolation conditions. The geometric framework ‘As shown in Figure 1, the sky hemisphere is divided into three zones: the horizon band, the circumsolar region and the rest of the sky. The diffuse radiation is assumed to be constant within each zone. Such & configuration helps to account for the two main types of anisotropy in the atmosphere: circumsolar and horizonal brightening. A 25° half angle for the circumsolar region was found by Peraz to pravide the best overall performance. Figure 1: Geometric Representation of Sky Dome If the diffuse radiances originating from the main portion of the dome, the circumsolar zone and the horizon band are L, F1 * Land F2* L respectively, then the resulting diffuse radiation, Dj, received by an inclined plane can be expressed as: o = Dn fO.5{1 + cos 8}{1 - Fi -F2] + Ft [ale] + F2 (b/d } where D,.Dn = _ diffuse radiation on inetine, horizontal B = tilt of plane from horizontal F1,F2 = diffuse radiation brightness coetficients a',b’ = __ solid angles occupied by circumsolar zone and horizon band weighted by their respective incidence on the slope ce = the equivalent of a’ and b’ for the horizontal ‘The new simplified version af the model assumes that all the energy of the horizon band is contained in an infinitesimally thin region at 0°. The above equation then becomes: Dr = On {0.511 + cos A) [1 - Ft] + Ft la’/e'] + F2 sin} The parametric representation of insolation conditions This section of the model is empirical and establishes the value of the brightness coefficients, F1 and F2, as functions of the insolation conditions. The magnitude of these parameters are treated as functions of the following parameters: the solar zenith angle, z ‘the horizontal diffuse radiation (normalised to d = Dam / la) the relative importance of direct radiation at the earth's surface, ‘expressed in the parameter = [Dn + !/ Dn. where, relative air mass (m= 1 / cos 2) solar zenith angie direct radiation normal to the sun's rays normal extraterrestrial radiation (lo = 1367 Wim?) m z lo ‘The parameters F1 and F2 are expressed as: FI = Fit+dFi2+2F13 F2 = F2i+dF22+zF23 ‘The values of the parameters F11....723 are presented in Table 1. These figures are for a 25° circumsolar halt angle and are obtained from experimental data. Tests using these figures for a range of sites indicate that they are not site dependent (Perez, 1987). Calculation method for Perez model In summary, the calculation procadura follows the steps outlined below (note that in this example all angl are in radians and all insolation measurements must be in ki/hcm?); 1, Input Data: Gh = global radiation on the horizontal Dn = diffuse radiation on the horizontal o hour angle = (Solar time - 12,00) = 15* x/ 180 ¢ = latitude (positive for southern hemisphere) a circumsolar half angie (a = 25° = 0.496 rad) n = Julian day, Jan 1st = 1 .... Dec 31st = 365 B = tiltof plane from horizontal At = Piane azimuth (As = 0° for a north facing plane) 2. Calculate sky parameters: & e declination angle -0.4093 sin{ 360/365 * {n + 284) * x/ 180} solar elevation arcsin (sin 5 sin @ + cos & cos $ cos @) soiar zenith a2-E solar azimuth arccos { (sin E sin $- sin }/ (cos Ecos $)) incidence angle of sun's rays on titted plane arecos (sin f cos E cos (A - A) + cos cos E) 3. Calculate model parameters; t d 4. Calculate Xh fz

You might also like