0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

WCP Unit 4

Uploaded by

santhoshraja v
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views

WCP Unit 4

Uploaded by

santhoshraja v
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

UNIT – IV

IRAN – IRAQ WAR

(Watch the video before you study: https://youtu.be/7XL7yNuIsVs )

a) Causes
b) Highlights of the war
c) Result and lessons learnt

CAUSES:

The causes of the Iran-Iraq conflict can be attributed to a wide range of issues

 POLITICAL CAUSES - historical claims of territory, Shatt al-Arab waterway


dispute, and the result of the Six-Day War
 ECONOMIC CAUSES - Occupying of Khuzestan, religious
 CULTURAL CAUSES - Cultural differences between Iran and Iraq and the results of
the Iranian revolution

SHORT-TERM CAUSES:

 Saddam Hussein ordered the exile of Iraqi citizens that had been born in Iran
 Invaded Iran in 1980 as the culmination of disputes between the two countries

LONG-TERM CAUSES:
 Border and Shatt al-Arab waterway disputes
 Overwhelming sense of nationalism
SHATT AL ARAB WATERWAY DISPUTE:
 Shatt al-Arab waterway is responsible for the connection between the Persian Gulf
with the Iranian ports of Khorramshahn and Abadan and the Iraqi port of Basra

IMPORTANCE OF SHAT AL-ARAB:

 The Shatt al-Arab is of utmost significance as it acts as current Iraq’s only access to
the Persian Gulf
 As well allows for the export and import of worldwide oil to and from Iran and Iraq
 The worldwide community soon became involved in the dispute over this river
 The Russians supported the desired claim of the eastern bank waterway to the
Persians, while Britain backed up the Ottoman in occupying both banks
 The support from the Russians and Britain in the occupying of the river would give
them each an upper hand with their trading partners

SHATT AL-ARAB TREATY:

 1847 treaty was established and stated that the Shatt would act as a boundary
Khorramshahn and Abadan
 Iraq would maintain complete control of this waterway and Iran would not be granted
access to the river
 However, Iran only agreed upon these terms in exchange for the two Iraqi cities
 They in turn reduced their dependence on the river

IN 1937:
A revised treaty was established in 1937, between the newly established and
independent Iran and Iraq

 The boundaries were to run along the left bank (east bank) of Shatt al-Arab, except for
a stretch of 8 kilometers in front of Abadan (Iranian town)
 Iran and Iraq maintained a somewhat friendly relationship
 Relationship was later disrupted by the instability of monarchies

NATIONALISM VS RIVALRY FOR POWER

 The participation of Iraq during the October War, more commonly referred to as the
Six Day War, under the governing of the Ba’ath Party was quite minimal
 Their minimal participation is primarily attributed to Iraq’s poor preparation
 This resulted in Iraq’s mentality to improve their warfare and expand militarily
 Iraq purchased 1,600 additional tanks from the USSR and 200 more aircraft.
 Ba’ath Party promoted Saddam to head of military competence, essentially giving
Saddam the right to complete military control

RESULT OF THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION:

 The Shah of Iran was overthrown in 1979 by radical Islamists and Communists
 Ayatollah Khomeini came into power
 The Iranian government led by the Shah, was previously pro-Western and anti-
socialist; turned into a highly religious and theocratic government
 Israel and the United States were now seen as enemies
 The mentality of Iranian government was drastically altered

QUEST FOR DOMINANCE


 With the overthrowing of the Shah dictatorship, the Shi’i Muslims of Iran saw this as
a new beginning for the country
 They developed a strong sense of pride and nationalism in their country
 Ayatollah Khomeini accused Saddam’s regime of being anti-Islamic and overly
secular
 Looking to overthrow the Iraqi regime
 This was part of Khomeini’s broader plan of expanding the Islamic Revolution
throughout the Middle East
 Saddam Hussein, in Iraq, was at the same time looking to establish himself as a great
leader in the Arab community
 Their neighbour’s in the west were seen as their largest threat
 Iran was viewed as militarily vulnerable as a result of their recent revolution in 1979
 It is difficult to pinpoint precisely when the war broke out
 Earliest forms of violence between the two countries include the following: the attack
on Iranian villages of Khmoneini supporting Iraqis in 1979 by Iraq and the support of
rebel groups, and the deportation of Irani-born Iraqi civilians
 Majority of these acts of violence occurred at the border between Iran and Iraq

THE OCCUPATION OF KHUZESTAN

 Another geographic region that was considered valuable in addition to the Shatt al
Arab, was Khuzestan
 Iraq strategized to seize control over Khuzestan (occurred in 1980), which is located
in southwestern Iran across from the waterway
 Khuzestan is rich with oil and is responsible for majority of Iran’s oil supply
 Saddam was convinced that the capture of this valuable piece of land would result in a
new Iranian revolution that would call for the installation of a government whose
interests were more comparable with Iraq’s

RELIGIOUS AND GOVERNMENTAL DIFFERENCES

 The difference in ideologies and religious beliefs between Iran and Iraq was an
outstanding issue
 newly established leaders caused an increased level of nationalism

IRAN

 Populated by Shi’i Muslims


 Led by Saddam Hussein
 Pro-socialist and Soviet
 Regime was quite secular

IRAQ

 Populated by Sunni Muslims


 Led by Ayatollah Khomeini
 Anti-socialist and Pro-Western under the Ba’ath regime
 Religious and theocratic government under role of Ayatollah Khomeini

THE INVASION OF IRAN BY SADDAM HUSSEIN ACTED AS A


CULMINATION TO FIGHTING.

EFFECTS OF THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR


1. The Final Stages of War
i) The Tanker Wars - 1984-87
ii) The War of the Cities - 1988
iii) Final Phases to Conclusion
2. Ceasefire
3. Effects on Iran
4. Effects on Iraq
THE FINAL STAGES: 1987-1988

 No clear military gain for either side; 1983-84 stalemate


 Iraq began facing difficulties prior to 1987
 Lacked capability to counter-attack Iranian offensives
 Outnumbered by population
 Iran strengthened by war
 Strong initiative in 1987 attacks
 Seemed better able to survive long conflict
 Since regaining all lost territory in 1982, Iran was on the offensive until 1988
 Course of war changed radically in the spring of 1988, moving nations to a cease-fire
 Series of Iraqi victories in 1988 compelled Iran to accept a previously refused
ceasefire agreement

TANKER WAR
 Tanker War of 1984 Iraqi attempt to sabotage Iran
 Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically important passages for oil transport
 United States threatened to invade Iran if they closed the Strait
 Iraq attacked Iranian Kharg Island oil tankers in 1984
 Iran retaliated by attacking tankers of all countries that supported Iraq
 Both nations attacked oil tankers and merchant ships in an effort to bankrupt opponent
 US involvement lead to the death of 290 innocent passengers on the mistaken airline,
a strike on 5 Iranian oil vessels
 Damaged Iranian American relations

WAR OF THE CITIES

 Stalemate 1985-1987
 Iraqi forces better trained, outnumbered by Iranian forces
 Civilians became the new target
 Started by Iraq in February 1988
 Iraq attacked 65 Iranian cities in 42 days

EFFECTS:

 8 missile targets killed 65 children in an elementary school


 Iranian civilian aircraft, trains
 Tehran Oil Refinery
 100,000 total casualties
 Iraq launched 520 Scuds at Iran and received 177 in return
 In March, Iran retaliated by launching 3 Scud missiles at Baghdad
 Gave Iraq an excuse to sharply escalate the war
 Iran was losing morale after 8 years of conflict
 Repeated offensives exhausted Iranian capabilities for the war
 Iranians no longer supported the war
 Publicizing the war pushed for a UN ceasefire
 Iran ambiguously 'accepted'
 USSR and China denied the US, UK, and France's arms embargo
 Iraq angrily denied USSR’s limited missile ceasefire
 Paralyzed UN
IRAQ'S CHEMICAL CAPABILITY

 Iraqi-controlled portion
 Historically oppressed by the Iraqi government
 Kurdish support for Iran angered Iraq
 Iraq launched heavy poison gas attacks on Halabjah, in March 1988
 Iraqi military had used both mustard and tabun nerve gas.

IRAQI KURDISTAN

 Khomeini showed the will to accept resolution 598

"Happy are those who have departed through martyrdom...Unhappy am I that I have
drunk this poisoned chalice."

 The United States only nation that did not publicly condemn the use of chemical
warfare

FINAL STAGES - MOVING TOWARDS CEASEFIRE

 1988 critical turning point in war's outcome

3 FACTORS

 The decline of Iran's ability to continue fighting due to political and military losses
 Western presence in Gulf combined with Iran's diplomatic isolation
 Critical changes to Iraq's armed forces and methods of warfare

CEASEFIRE

 Following major setbacks, Iran accepted Peace Resolution 598 on August 20 1988
 Both sides agreed to pre-war boundaries

RESOLUTION 598:

 Accept ceasefire and withdraw forces


 Settle border disputes under UN-held negotiations
 Same terms as 1982 Resolution
 Final exchange of POW in 2003

AFTERMATH:
IRAN
POLITICAL EFFECTS
 Immediately rebuilt broken ties with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain
 Relations with European countries
 Diplomatic problems with the West untouched
 US was looking to contain Iran

NEW IRANIAN LEADERSHIP 1989:

 Ayatollah Khomeini dies, Ali Khamenei elected as Supreme Leader of Iran by the
Assembly of Experts
 Akbar Rafsanjani elected as President
 Adopted the 'Economy First' policy
 Attempted to boost foreign investment and trade by liberalizing Iranian markets
 Supported privatization policy
 Economic reforms helped spur Iranian regrowth

ECONOMIC EFFECTS

 A collapsing economy, further declined collapse from Islamic Revolution


 1 million casualties
 Exhausted foreign reserves (14.6 billion to 1 billion)
 Saudi Arabia vetoed the Iranian OPEC attempt to cut production and raise prices
 Oil revenue dropped from $20 billion in 1982 to $5 billion in 1988
 Oil reserves have yet to recover from extensive damages
 Cheaper investments lead to less debt
 Ayatollah's interpretation stopped borrowing

CULTURAL EFFECTS

 Shi'a Muslims continued to dominate


 Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps was created to defend theocratic rule (Shiite
National Guard)
 Before his death, Khomeini tried influencing Sunni Iranians with his own theocratic
beliefs
 The 90s saw an imbalance of religion and republicanism
TECHNOLOGICAL EFFECTS

 Outcome of the war influenced scientific advancements in Iran


 Experienced technological and research revival
 Has the fastest scientific growth rate

AFTERMATH:
IRAQ
POLITICAL EFFECTS
 US-Iraq ties
 US largest Western supporter of Iraq during war
 Iraq believed it could act without consequence in Gulf War
 President Bush signed NSD 26
 US wanted to maintain 'friendly relations' with Gulf oil states
 National security for US and stability in Gulf

PATHWAY TO GULF WAR

 Iraq relied on oil exports to rebuild the economy


 Law of Supply: As supply increases, price decreases (and vice versa)
 Kuwait refused to implement a quota
 Iraq's economy unable to rebuild from war reparations
 Accusations of Kuwait drilling illegally in Iraqi oil fields
 Lead to the invasion of Kuwait in 1990
 Hussein introduced austerity measures to mobilize the population for the war effort
 All citizens required to donate blood
 To gain Shiite support, more were let into the government
 Bought support by making generous contributions to Shia waqf

CULTURAL EFFECTS
 Hussein introduced austerity measures to mobilize the population for the war effort
 All citizens required to donate blood
 To gain Shiite support, more were let into the government
 Bought support by making generous contributions to Shia waqf
 Systematic attacks against Kurdish population
 The US assisted Iraq in avoiding repercussions from worldwide condemnation
 Mustard gas, Sarin chemical weapons
 Massacred 50,000 - 100,000 civilians
 Destroyed 4,000 villages, 4,500 schools, mosques, hospitals, and 27 churches

HALABJAH MASSACRE, MARCH 1988

 Poison gas attack on Iraqi Kurds in Southern Kurdistan


 Iraqi method of punishing Kurds for supporting Iranian forces
 5000 immediately dead, 7000 suffered from poisoning
 War brought international attention to Kurdish oppression
 UN passed Resolution 688 in 1991, condemning Iraqi oppression of Kurds
 Demanded access to humanitarian aid

ECONOMIC EFFECTS
 500,000 casualties
 $600 billion debt accumulated with the destruction of economic developments
 Relations with allies grew tense as Iraq unable to pay back debts
 Slowed GDP growth
 Eventually became the most indebted poor country in the world

CONCLUSION

 8 years of fighting in vain, for both sides


 Deadliest conflicts since WWII
 Both countries were devastated economically
 Iran seemed to have learnt from mistakes, while bankrupt Iraq found itself involved in
another conflict
 In 1990, Saddam Hussein recognized Iranian rights over eastern half of Shaat-Al Arab
 First widespread use of chemical warfare since 1918
 Iran became more militaristic and anti-western

You might also like