Sustainable: Graphic Design
Sustainable: Graphic Design
graphic design
What can be done to promote the use of
sustainable graphic design in Brisbane?
7504QCA Design Research Project | Semester 2 2007
Rebecca Green | s2567186
PCF
1 Executive Recommendations 1
2 Introduction 2
2.1 Purpose of Study 2
2.1.1 Research Question 2
2.1.2 Hypothesis 2
2.2 Definition of Terminology 3
2.3 Limitations of Study 3
3 Explanation of Topic 4
3.1 Previous Study 4
3.2 Focus of Research 6
3.4 Relevance of Research 7
4 Literature Review 9
5. Methodology 16
5.1 Theory 16
5.2 Instrument 17
5.3 Sampling 17
5.4 Instrumentation 20
5.5 Findings 22
5.6 Conclusions 38
6 Critical Discussion of Conclusions 40
6.1 What the study revealed 40
7 Design Solutions 43
7.1 Street Poster Campaign 43
7.2 Designer’s desktop widget 49
8 Recommendations 52
9 References 53
Appendices 57
Appendix 1 web survey 57
Appendix 2 AGDA news post 61
Appendix 3 DbN news post 61
Appendix 4 AGDA QLD email 61
Appendix 5 o2 Network mailing list post 61
Appendix 6 Designer’s widget content 61
2.1.2 Hypothesis
Without support from clients, sustainable graphic design
is not possible.
Tony Fry defines the term recoding thus: “…if we give the existing things of
the world new meanings, we effectively change the world and our actions in
it. (Fry, 2006)
The design solution, a street poster campaign, primarily targeted the use
of gloss paper by the magazine industry as a simple starting point for
awareness within the general community as a means of building client
support.
Graphic designers can have a major impact on the environment, and with
the current water shortage particularly affecting Brisbane, graphic designers
must begin to add sustainable solutions to their knowledge base as
standard practice.
Taking into account the number of magazines sold in Australia each month
– over 18 million (Magazine Publishers of Australia n.d.), this example from
“Sustainable Graphic Design in Brisbane” (Green, 2007) shows how changes
to the specifications can make a huge difference:
For whatever reasons people are altering their ideology to reflect this new
paradigm; the problem is that ideology and actual actions do not appear
to be matching. This difference is known among social psychologists
as the A-B split (Bell, 2006), where A (attitude) represents what people
profess to believe, and B (behaviour) represents how they act. While each
individual’s A-B split may be cause for internal struggle or external scorn,
its main cause is the social structure. For example, I buy a magazine that
I need for research. It is made from 100% chopped-down trees, and my
only alternative is to not buy it. This means that our social structures must
change to enable us to close the split between our beliefs and actions
(Bell, 2006).
In his book, Hannigan refers to Joel Best’s view of how those individuals
or organisations ‘construct’ these problems in the public sphere, which
Best terms making “claims”. A claims-making campaign has three parts.
First, the grounds; either definitions, examples, or numeric estimates
based on facts. Secondly, the warrants, the justification or reason for
action, where the grounds are linked to basic rights or freedoms.
Thirdly, the conclusions, which refer to the action required to respond
to the problem.
The survey was designed to notify respondents if they had not completed all
compulsory questions on the survey, and submission was not possible until
this was rectified, ensuring greater accuracy in qualitative data. Open-ended
questions were optional, except for Q.7 which asked for respondent’s location,
vital for filtering non-Australian respondents.
Submitted data was then sent via email and entered as data for analysis.
5.3 Sampling
Respondents were directed to the survey through the following electronic
methods:
Data from the remaining 62 respondents were accepted for analysis. The
62 respondents were from all over Australia (fig.6), from a variety of graphic
design levels (fig.7)
figure 6
City or town in which
respondent is based
Brisbane
Sydney 2
Melbourne 6
17
Adelaide
2
Canberra
2
Hobart
Perth 4
Regional QLD 1
Regional NSW 8 3
Gold Coast
18
Excluded
9 Outside Australia
figure 7
respondent’s job title
Junior designer
Graphic designer
Senior designer
Art director 1 2 19
Mac Operator
Student 7
Studio Owner
4
Excluded
6
4 None of the above 24
(no alternative job
title was stated)
Question 12 was a completely open question, asking the subject if they had
anything they wished to add to inform the study, or to talk about the issue
of sustainable graphic design in general. This question was posed at the
conclusion of the interview, so that the subject was aware of the full scope
of questions, and could add to the body of information already supplied.
The univariate mean responses for techniques coded as biocidal (fig.8), and
those coded sustainable (fig.9) are shown below. The most common biocidal
print method is using bleed, followed by the use of coated paper and 4 or
more colours in print jobs. The most common sustainable print methods
were using paper with strong environmental accreditation, general uncoated
paper and the use of less than 2 colours.
Interestingly, the mean response of the use of environmental paper does not
correspond with the use of corresponding environmental logos on the print
job (fig. 9).
figure 8
Mean response of techniques coded as biocidal
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.127
on all jobs 5
4.339
4
3.306
3.145
3
2.306
2
1.500 1.419
1.097
never 1
metallic ink
cello coating
UV Varnish or
Bleed
Coated paper
Fluorescent ink
Foil stamping
in print job
4 or more colours
figure 9
Mean response of techniques coded as sustainable
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.127
on all jobs 5
4
3.339
3.113
3
2.629
2.403 2.306
1.984
2
1.613 1.613
never 1
Uncoated paper
based ink
Soy or vegetable-
enviro credentials
Paper with strong
Embossing
logo or similar
Adding recycled
Water-based glue
Aqueous varnish
4 colour print
Less than
no 24%
don’t know
27.5%
13
13
12
10
8
7
5
4
4
3 3 3 3
1
purchasing green electricity
Changes in office eg.
Electronic proofing
Soy-based ink
Electronic solution
Smaller quantity
don’t know
40%
Figure 12 no 8%
respondents whose regular
yes 52%
printer has a company
environmental statement
yes 95%
Figure 13
respondents who would like don’t know
to use more sustainable 5%
techniques
number of responses
3
3
2
Figure 14 2
barriers to sustainable graphic
1
design for the three “don’t know” 1
respondents in fig. 10
0
cheapest option
My client prefers the
Figure 15
barriers to sustainable graphic design for all respondents
39
36
number of responses
22
18
6
2
cheapest option
My client prefers the
my organisation
Lack of support from within
any difference
I don’t feel I can make
I need to learn more about it
The results for the “no” and “I don’t know” respondents were very similar.
Figure 16
barriers to sustainable graphic design with Question 3 sub-sample
» While sustainable ideals are top of mind with our studio, our corporate
clients are just starting to get the message and therefore their choices/
decisions are not necessarily driving enviro solutions.
» The above ticks apply to just some of our clients, some are quite
environmentally minded.
» To some varying degree for all of above depending on client, job and
technique. Question is a bit broad.
» Often times, we are bound by client expectation. That said, with greater
awareness we may be able to push for more sustainable techniques.
» All clients are very supportive and I don’t quote non-environmental
stocks, so they don’t see any price comparison.
» The studio believes it is accountable for ensuring the best possible
outcome while minimising environmental impact, and only offers the
most environmentally sustainable production solutions available within
the client budget.
» No factors prevent us, we’ve been doing it wherever possible for ages.
» Depends on nature of the job and what the solution requires.
Depends on budget/options provided by printers.
Again, most respondents refer to client support, in either a negative or
positive way, as the major contributor to the use of sustainable graphic
design.
Results show that clients are rarely prompting the dialogue on sustainable
solutions to their design briefs for a majority of respondents. 82% of
respondents’ clients are asking about sustainable graphic design less than
half the time (fig. 18).
Figure 17
client enquiry into sustainable graphic design
26 25
number of responses
6
4
1
not at all
sometimes
on all jobs
Figure 19
designer discussion of sustainable options with client
19
12 12
number of responses
10 9
not at all
sometimes
on all jobs
Networking with other designers was rated slightly higher than seeking
information from books, journals and magazines.
Figure 21
mean response of sustainable graphic design resources
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.143
most-used 5
4.194
4 3.742
3.274
3 2.806 2.790
2.242
2
least-used 1
Internet
Paper company
Print company
Other designers
Books
Figure 22
respondent’s formal education on sustainability
28
number of responses
22
6
3 3
0
0
over 6 years ago
No, but that was
No
No
65%
yes, both
9%
yes, ethics
Figure 23 9% small amount
filtered results of
17%
respondent’s formal
education on sustainability
Table 2
Respondent comments
Green design doesn’t have to be ‘packaged’ as hippy, left, There needs to be strict environmental standards imposed
or alternate... countless samples come in which all look on printers to considerably clean up their act in order to
like the ‘scruffy greenie’ which has been stereotyped. This meet environmental sustainability, as well as on paper
makes it hard to sell to a dull client, if recycled papers, companies so that they can only supply environmentally
inks etc all looked A grade and I fear ‘corporate’ much sustainable paper. This way designers and their clients
more would be used, or signed off on. have to comply to being environmentally sustainable.
Environmentally-sustainable graphic design is a great A gov’t subsidy to offset increased costs of using the
concept but in reality, in a regional area like ours, it is enviro-best products would help...
difficult to achieve. We have an inhouse printery for
whom price is the prime factor - we have little choice
in stock selection for the majority of our jobs. For some Env sustainable design is the core practice of my business
jobs, we are fortunate to be able to specify the paper, so this is not a typical response.
grammage and supplier - but even when we select an
environmentally conscious option, there is still a high
probability that the paper is coming in from Europe to Very frustrating when a lot of designers say they employ
Australia then to our regional area - so a large freight green design methods and all they do is just choose a
footprint - which in some ways negates the good effect mildly green stock. Education required for both designers
of choosing that particular stock (we think??) Is it just a and printers, and a far greater commitment.
feel good (for us) exercise rather than an economical and
It’s also viewed as not able to make much of a difference
sustainable option??
in terms of it being such a small part of the overall
business pie, but we all have to do our part regardless.
Investigation into the reasons behind this difference in the A/B split of
Australian graphic designers revealed barriers that can be grouped into
three main areas:
» Client support
» Education
» Lack of available manufacturers
Client Support
The highest-rated barriers for the 48% of designers who had consciously
employed sustainable graphic design techniques were those involving
client requirements. For the full complement of respondents, the same
barriers rated in the top three, with education coming in second. Lack of
support within the organisation also rated highly.
Most respondents commented that client support was the major barrier to
the use of sustainable graphic design. The dialogue on sustainable design
between designers and clients is mostly sparked by the designer, although
many did signal that many of their clients are very supportive: “The above
ticks apply to just some of our clients, some are quite environmentally
minded” (Survey respondent, p.30).
Initially, this report looked for ways to educate clients to address this
barrier, however the literature review suggested a larger, society-based
solution instead: “It’s not the client that needs to be educated. It’s the
culture.” (Smith, cited in Poynor, 2006 p. 108). Bell (2006) suggested that
society structures need to change to allow all members of society to more
closely align their attitudes and behaviours.
For designers who have already completed their education, other means
of education must be pursued. The most-used resource was the internet,
with industry networks the next-most used. Printed matter was the
least-used resource. This supports the semester 1 design outcome of
a Macintosh desktop widget, which contains basic sustainable graphic
design information for quick reference. Happily, AGDA have agreed to
host this widget on their website and fund its development through the
Gordon Andrews scholarship. This will give the widget its necessary
credibility and serve to commence AGDA’s commitment to providing
sustainable graphic design solutions for the Australian graphic design
community.
This really proved expensive, and when examined closely, was probably
going to be a bit confusing and over-designed for the general public. The
message would be lost, and yet
another piece of biocidal print
would head straight to land fill.
Figure 23
Initial design concept:
Toxic Print handout
Estimated environmental impact of the paper found in 5574 metric tons of paper stock
table 3: Estimated impact of the paper found in 5574 metric tons of paper stock
Environmental impact estimates were made using the Environmental Defense Paper Calculator.
For more information visit http://www.papercalculator.org.
favourite magazine to
1 choose better paper
Work with qualified
g
graphic designers who
2 know what to do
Figure 26
Poster displayed in various cafes and
venues in Brisbane
Figure 28
original sustainability
widget in various states
As this widget serves the primary layer, that of sustainable graphic design
techniques and methods, the main focus must remain on simple, factual
instruction in this area. However, it would be unwise not to take advantage
of the educational opportunity provided by this widget, and its scheduled
home on the AGDA website. As a result, some ethical summaries have been
added, as well as links to more substantial websites to prompt thought in
this area. The content for this widget can be found in appendix 6.
Figure 29
sustainability widget
displaying selected print
technique information
Figure 30
sustainability widget in
“global warming”
colour scheme
Figure 31
sustainability widget in
“greenhouse”
colour scheme
Figure 32
sustainability widget in
“ice cap”
colour scheme
Press, M & Cooper, R 2003: The Design Experience: The role of design and
designers in the twenty-first century
Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot
Purcell, C 2007: A duty to indulge, and pass on the tales of a golden era
The Sydney Morning Herald, 24 October 2007
Retrieved October 25, 2007 from
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/23/1192941065120.html
Sustainability Victoria n.d.: “You have the power. Save energy” campaign,
black balloons ad
Retrieved September 12, 2007, from
http://www.saveenergy.vic.gov.au/getthefacts/whatisblackballoon.aspx
1. On a scale of 1 to 5, how often have you specified these print techniques in the last 3 months?
on all
never jobs
metallic ink 1 2 3 4 5
bleed 1 2 3 4 5
uncoated paper 1 2 3 4 5
coated paper 1 2 3 4 5
flourescent inks 1 2 3 4 5
embossing 1 2 3 4 5
foil stamping 1 2 3 4 5
water-based glue 1 2 3 4 5
aqueous varnish 1 2 3 4 5
yes
no
I don't know
yes
no
I don't know
yes
no
I don't know
Art Director
Mac Operator
Account manager
Production manager
Studio Owner
not at all sometimes about half the time more than half the time on all jobs
not at all sometimes about half the time more than half the time on all jobs
least- most-
used used
Internet 1 2 3 4 5
Print company 1 2 3 4 5
Paper company 1 2 3 4 5
Other designers 1 2 3 4 5
Books 1 2 3 4 5
No
A small amount
Yes, techniques
You are receiving this email because you are or have been an AGDA AGDA Inbox is
member or have added your email to our mailing list. If you do not wish produced
to receive this email, please unsubscribe below or reply to this email with by AGDA Queensland
the word 'unsubscribe' as the subject header. PO Box 858
Fortitude Valley Q
If you would not like to receive AGDA Inbox, please go here:
4006
unsubscribe
ABN 13 813 089 272
If you would like to subscribe or refer a friend, please go here: subscribe www.agda.com.au
PAPER
Coated papers Harder to recycle due to clay coating. 40% less fibres can be re-used from
coated stock than from uncoated stock. In some areas, there is more coated
paper being recycled than can actually be used, as gloss is specified at much
higher rates than uncoated or satin.
Uncoated or satin papers Easier to recycle than coated papers
Recycled paper Look for paper with a high percentage of recycled fibre, of which a high
percentage is post-consumer waste (PCW).
Some recycled paper has a very small percentage of recycled fibre, some of
which is pre-consumer waste, (rejected paper made from virgin fibre, aka mill-
broke, re-used in “recycled” stock).
Paper using virgin fibre Look for accreditation, such as
1. Blue Angel or Nordic Swan for European Papers
2. FSC (Forest Stewardship Council – Check what percentage of fibre is
accredited)
3. EMAS (Eco Management and Audit System in Europe) and/or ISO 14001
(an international environmental management standard).
Unbleached or ECF/PCF/TCF white paper Unbleached paper uses no harmful bleaches, but if white papers are required,
look for (order of preference) 1. PCF (Process Chlorine Free) or TCF (Totally
Chlorine Free) 2. ECF (Elemental Chlorine Free)
Petroleum-based ink The drying agent, petroleum, releases VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) into the atmosphere during
the drying process. VOCs contribute to low-lying ozone and smog. These inks are also more difficult
to de-ink than vegetable or water-based inks. Petroleum inks that go to landfill can leach hazardous
metals into the soil, possibly contaminating the water table.
Soy, Vegetable & water-based inks Soy or vegetable ink still produces a small amount of VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) but these
inks can also be cleaned from the press with water instead of solvents. Soybean oil is a renewable
resource. 10% VOCs should be the highest percentage produced by your printer’s ink.
Water-based ink looks different to petroleum or vegetable inks, but is far cleaner. Both inks are
biodegradable, and are easier to recycle
Varnishes Mylar, UV varnish, polypropylene, celloglaze are all much harder to strip out of paper for recycling.
Some laser sorters mistake gloss UV varnish for plastic. Alternative varnishes are available, either
water-based or cellulose-based.
Solid areas of ink Solid ink areas increase the difficulty in the de-inking process. Using a 70% screen instead of solid
pms or cmyk is preferred.
Metallic ink Increases the difficulty in de-inking process. Metallic inks that go to landfill leach heavy metals into
the soil. Particularly worrisome metals are: cadmium, arsenic, mercury, antimony, lead, selenium,
considered a serious hazard to humans.
Number of inks The choice of ink colours should be carefully considered if the piece is likely to be recycled. Use
as few inks as possible to aid the de-inking process. If considering a 3 colour job, consider a cmyk
alternative. This may be cheaper and result in less wash-up of the press.
Dark blue, dark purple and red These colours are more difficult to de-ink than other colours, requiring additional chemicals and
colours treatment.
Binding material Plastic bindings can create problems when mixed with wastepaper. Metal binding can be easily
removed with magnets in the recycling process.
Bleed By eliminating ink in bleed areas as far as possible, the waste from the print job is much cleaner, and
less chemicals are needed for recycling the waste.
PRINT (continued)
Offset printing Waster water from dampening solutions, part of the lithographic process, is tainted with a high VOC
(Volatile Organic Compounds) count. Press and blanket roller washing solutions also contain harmful
solvents which also contain high VOC levels. Try to find a printer with FSC accreditation, ISO 14001 or
at least a company environmental statement.
Waterless printing Waterless printing uses no dampening solution, instead, a silicone-coated printing plate, specialised
ink and a temperature-controlled press are used. Images can be much crisper using this system, as
dot gain is lower, thus screen rulings can be higher (depending on stock selected). Quality levels are
often reached faster, resulting in less waste paper.
Digital printing Digital printing uses no harmful chemicals to clean the machinery, inks are safer and there is no
wastage, as each printed item is a one-off print.
Embossing Embossing uses no ink, and the metal die can be re-used for other embosses.
Die cutting Die cutting also uses no ink, and the knives in the die can be re-shaped to new dies easily.
Solvent-based glues Solvents in glues for bindings and labels emit harmful VOCs and make the recycling and de-inking
process more difficult.
Water-based glues Water-based glues dissolve easily during the recycling and de-inking process.
ETHICS
Sustainable graphic design Design and production that consciously reduces adverse environmental impact
as far as possible. At best, ensuring that obviously destructive techniques are
applied wisely, conservatively and for an ethical purpose.
Get involved 1 Use your design skills to help an environmental or social justice group to make
their claims stand out and be heard
Get involved 2 Ask your client if they would like to see a sustainable graphic design option on
their next job
Get involved 3 Ask your printer if they have a company environmental statement, and if they
plan to seek ISO 14001 or FSC accreditation
links http://www.designbynature.org/
http://www.o2.org/
http://www.ecogeek.org/
http://www.re-nourish.com/
http://www.treehugger.com/
http://www.green.net.au/srd/
Primary Research
Recommendations
Bibliography