0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views17 pages

PHD Regulations July 2018

Uploaded by

guptaraushan1055
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views17 pages

PHD Regulations July 2018

Uploaded by

guptaraushan1055
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Regulations for PhD Program

(Effective from Academic Session 2018-19)

National Institute of Technology Durgapur

1
1.0. Introduction

1.1. The Institute offers doctoral research program leading to the degree of Doctor of
Philosophy (PhD).

1.2. Notwithstanding any of the clauses provided in the Regulations, the Senate can exercise
its powers to amend/interpret/implement decisions and actions concerned with academic
matters.

1.3 A joint PhD degree may be awarded by NIT Durgapur and another premier academic
institution in India or abroad with which NIT Durgapur has MoU to this effect. However, each
such case shall have to be approved by the respective Senate.

1.5. All the norms and guidelines of the UGC/AICTE will be covered in the PhD program at
NIT Durgapur. (UGC Regulations, 2016; The Gazette of India, July 5, 2016, Part III, Section 4)

1.6. The Board of Governors of the Institute may, on the recommendation of the Senate,
change any or all parts of the Regulations at any time.

1.7. The medium of communication, instruction, examination, seminars and the defense of PhD
thesis will be English.

2.0. Admission

2.1. Status of research scholar: The status of the candidates admitted to the PhD program
shall be classified under any one of the following categories:

A. Full-time research scholar with Institute Scholarship


B. Full-time research scholar with financial support from Government programs (sponsored by
DST/CSIR/UGC, etc.)
C. Full-time research scholar selected in externally sponsored projects in the Institute
D. Full-time research scholar under QIP/ EFIP scheme
E. Full-time foreign research scholar admitted through Government of India
F. Part-time research scholar from the Institute (NIT Durgapur) Faculty/ Staff
G. F u l l t i m e s ponsored research scholar from Government/ Semi-Government/ other
highly reputed organizations/academic or research institutions
H. Part-time sponsored research scholars from reputed industries (Industry Research Program)
I. Part time research scholars from academic/ research institutions
J. Part time sponsored research scholars under Government of India schemes like TEQIP, etc. as
approved by the Senate.

Beside above categories, admission of research scholar from foreign institution/organization


shall be made as per laid down terms and conditions in MoU with respective institute /
organization.

The PhD degree awarded to all categories of students shall be treated as the same and
equivalent.

2
2.2. Eligibility for Admission

The minimum qualification required for admission to PhD program is one of the following:

2.2.1. Minimum Eligibility Criteria for Admission to Full Time Ph.D. Program of NIT
Durgapur

Qualifying Degree* General/ SC / ST National Eligibility Test Qualifications


(for relevant discipline) OBC
M. Tech./ M.E./ M. 6.5 CGPA or 6.0 CGPA or Category A: Post graduate degree in
Arch/ M. Pharm / 60% marks 55% marks basic science with NET/GATE
equivalent / MBA/ qualification or Graduate degree in
PGDBM/ PGDM Professional course with NET/GATE
qualification or Post graduate degree
M. Sc./ M. Com./ 6.5 CGPA or 6.0 CGPA or Professional courses. (F. No. 17-2/2014-
MBBS/ BDS 60% marks 55% marks TS.I dated 2nd March, 2015)
B. Tech/ B.E./ MCA/ 7.5 CGPA or 7.0 CGPA or
B. Arch/ B. Pharm 70% marks 65% marks List of NETs:
MA 6.0 CGPA or 5.5 CGPA or CSIR, UGC, GATE, JAM, GPAT, DBT-
55% marks 50% marks JRF, JEST, ICMR, ICAR, NBHM,
CA/ ICWAI/ CS with a 55% marks 50% marks Bioinformatics National Certification
graduation degree Examination etc.

(OM No. SB/S9/2-01/2015 dated


07.01.2015)

However, these qualifications will have


to be relevant to the qualifying degree of
the candidate concerned.

The candidate must have a valid GATE /


NET.

Category B, C, D and E: As per the terms


and conditions of the funding agency.

Other categories: Not mandatory

*All the degrees will be from an institute / university recognized by UGC/AICTE/MHRD.


The preceding qualifying degrees of the candidates required for admission shall be decided by the
respective DRPC.

2.2.2. Scholars under categories C and F must submit a no-objection certificate from the
Institute / PI of the project respectively during admission. They shall work for the PhD program
without affecting their normal duties.

2.2.3. Research scholars of categories G, H, I and J shall submit a Sponsorship / No-objection


certificate, as applicable, from the employer during admission. In case the candidate joins a new
organization, submission of a fresh NOC obtained from them is mandatory.
3
2.2.5. Mere possession of required degree and a good academic record does not guarantee
admission to a candidate for the Ph.D. program. Apart from academic record, the DRPC
will take into consideration the research aptitude, ability to work in a team, subject interest,
availability of supervisors, facilities in the department and the research focus of the
department while selecting candidates to the Ph.D. program through a pre-defined process.

2.3. Residential Requirement:

2.3.1. Normally all full-time candidates admitted to the PhD program will be required to stay in
the Institute till they complete all assigned work and submit thesis. However, for full-time
candidates sponsored from Government / Semi - government / major industry with established
R&D facilities, the DRPC may recommend to reduce the minimum residential requirement
to one year or higher (for completing the course work and formulating the research problem).

2.3.2. If a full-time sponsored candidate intends to carry out a major part of his research work in
his place of employment, s/he must convince the DRPC at the time of selection that adequate
research facilities and research tradition exist in his organisation. While taking the decision
DRPC will examine all the documents presented to it regarding adequacy of the R&D facilities
available in the sponsoring organisation. These documents have to be furnished by the candidate
during the time of interview. In general major Central Govt. (CSIR, DRDO, DAE, ISRO, CDRC
etc.) labs, research organisations, industries (public or private) with established R&D facilities
are taken as organisations with adequate facilities. Regarding recognition of other organisations
the DRPC has to make a recommendation on the basis of the material available to it to the
Director through Dean (Academic) for approval. In every case, the Senate will decide the
residential requirement.

2.3.3 The part-time candidates of categories H, I and J are mandated to have contact with the
supervisor(s) for discussion and research in the Institute for at least 90 days a year in a
single/multiple visits.

2.4. Admission procedure:

2.4.1. Admission of scholars under categories A and B shall be made once in each semester as
per a pre-decided schedule indicating the total number of seats available. Dean (Academic) will
publish the admission notice on the Institute website. The departments will screen the
applications based on pre-defined criteria sent by the Academic Section and prepare the
shortlist. They will conduct admission tests (for category A), followed by shortlisting based on
pre-defined criteria, if needed, and viva voce, and select the candidates on the basis of overall
academic performance, written test and viva voce. The department will send the list of selected
candidates to the office of the Dean (Academic). One expert from other department, selected
from a panel of experts nominated by Director, will act as an observer in the viva voce.

2.4.2. Admission of scholars under categories C shall be made once in each semester along with
the scholars under categories A and B. The candidate shall submit the application through the
Dean (R&C) in the prescribed format of Sponsored Research and Consultancy Cell (SRCC) on
recommendation of concerned PI and Head of the Department. The selection procedure will be
the same as category A.

2.4.3. Admission under categories F, G, H, I and J shall be made once in every academic
year, during Odd Semester only.

4
2.4.3.1. The admission under categories F, H and J shall be made directly subject to fulfillment
of eligibility criteria fixed by the respective departments, and submission of requisite documents
and no-objection/ sponsorship certificate. The admission shall be subject to the availability of
suitable supervisor(s) and the endorsement by the department.

2.4.3.2 Admission of candidates under categories G and I shall be made against the admission
notice on the Institute website. The departments will conduct admission tests and viva voce,
select the candidates on the basis of overall academic performance, written test and viva voce
and send the list of selected candidates to the office of the Dean (Academic). Dean (Academic)
shall publish the selection list on the Institute website. The candidates need to produce a
sponsorship / No objection certificate in the prescribed format of the Institute during the
admission test. For the category I, a Board of external examiners shall be constituted by the
Chairman, Senate for the selection process.

2.4.4. Admission of research scholar from foreign institution/organization shall be made as


per laid down terms and conditions in MoU with respective institute / organization during t h e
o dd Semester only.

2.4.5. Applications of candidates shall be received by the office of Dean (Academic) and
forwarded to the departments for screening. Dean (Academic) shall publish the short-list of
the candidates screened by the departments on the Institute website along with the date, time
and venue of the admission test and viva voce.

2.4.6. Dean (Academic) shall publish the selection list on the Institute website. All
communication related to the admission procedure shall be made through the Institute
website www.nitdgp.ac.in only. Regular reservation policy of the Government of India shall
apply.

2.4.7. All selected candidates will fill in the admission form (vide Annexure - I) and submit
an undertaking that s/he would abide by all rules and regulations and codes of conduct of the
Institute.

2.4.8. Respective departments shall be responsible for the selection of research scholars.

2.5. Withdrawal from Residency

2.5.1. A sponsored student, pursuing PhD by staying on campus, can become non-resident
by taking withdrawal from the program. She/he may return to his place of work on completion of
residential requirement, provided that such a scenario was mentioned in his application for
admission and the student has a co-supervisor from his place of employment. The minimum
period of work will be extended by one year, except when the student is employed in a superior
R&D organization and is engaged in full time research on the same topic as his PhD works.
The Deputy Registrar (Academic) will issue a withdrawal order.

2.5.2. In case of students, who secure a new job or otherwise wish to move outside the
institute and end their doctoral program prematurely, need to refund any scholarship received.

3.0. Supervisors

3.1. The assignment of PhD students to supervisor(s) by DRPC and constitution of Doctoral
Scrutiny Committee (DSC) following enrollment/admission of the PhD students will be made
within a period of fifteen days from the date of enrollment. Chairperson (DRPC), in consultation
5
with the supervisor/co-supervisor(s), shall constitute the DSC (vide Annexure - II). The
supervisor/co-supervisor(s) (s) shall finalize the broad (tentative) title of the research topic
of a selected candidate after mutual discussion.

3.2. All supervisors/co-supervisors of PhD program shall be at least in the rank of Assistant
Professor or equivalent having a PhD degree. If a person from outside the Institute, not
satisfying these criteria, is proposed to be a co-supervisor, the matter shall be referred to the
Senate for decision.

3.3. The maximum number of research scholars that one supervisor can supervise, at any
point of time, is eight. The candidates who have already submitted the thesis will not be
included for the purpose.

A faculty member shall not supervise more than 8 PhD research scholars at any point of time. For
the calculation of the number, 50% weightage will be considered for the part-time candidates and
for joint supervision.

3.4. There can be one supervisor and maximum one co-supervisor for a research scholar from the
Institute, with maximum one additional co-supervisor from outside.

3.5 The supervisor/co-supervisor must be a regular faculty member of the Institute belonging to
the department in which the research scholar will be registered for doctoral studies.

3.6. The co-supervisor(s) may be from the same department of the Institute or other
departments / outside.

3.6.1. A person from abroad satisfying the qualification criteria may become a co -
supervisor. NIT Durgapur will have, however, no financial responsibility, whatsoever, in the
r esear ch visits, if any, required for the collaborative research.

3.6.2. Co-supervisors from other institutions/ organizations shall submit curriculum vitae, a
consent letter and a no-objection c e r t i f i c a t e fr om the employer during formation of DSC,
if they do not have MoU with NIT Durgapur.

3.7. Any change in supervisor/co-supervisor shall have to be recommended by the DSC and
forwarded to the office of Dean (Academic) for approval of Senate.

3.7.1. Change of supervisor/co-supervisor under exceptional circumstances shall be permitted


on the recommendation of the DSC, subject to the consent of the research scholar, the
present supervisor/co-supervisor and the proposed supervisor/co-supervisor. However, the
candidate shall not be permitted to present synopsis seminar within one year from the date of
change of supervisor/co-supervisor.

3.7.2. Addition of co-supervisor shall be permitted on the recommendation of the DSC,


subject to the consent of the research scholar. However, the candidate shall not be permitted
to present synopsis seminar within one year from the date of addition of supervisor/co-
supervisor.

3.8. When a supervisor leaves the Institute permanently or temporarily for a period exceeding
6 months, the DSC shall appoint a new supervisor for the research scholar before his/her
departure.

6
3.9. The DSC may consider continuation of the original supervisor on his/her return to the
Institute as one of the supervisors.

3.10. A supervisor/co-supervisor after superannuation shall continue to act as the co-supervisor.


However, if the research scholar has no supervisor from the department in which s/he is
registered, one faculty member of the same department shall be made the supervisor after
consultation with the superannuating supervisor and the research scholar. In case of the
candidate already presented synopsis seminar successfully, no additional supervisor shall be
necessary.

4.0. Semester Registration

4.1. A student enrolled in the PhD program will be required to register every semester along with
endorsement of satisfactory progress by the DSC (vide Annexure - IV) and by paying tuition
fees and other Institute dues the Semester registration is different from Academic registration.
The DSC shall approve a report on the progress made by the scholar at the end of each semester
and submit along with the registration form.

4.2. Sponsored students who have been sanctioned withdrawal also need to do semester
registration. They may, however, be permitted to send registration form by post to their
supervisor, who will present them to the Academic Section through the HOD.

4.3. Failure to do semester registration within the stipulated dates as per Academic Calendar will
result in termination of studentship, which in a very special case can be restored by the Senate on
consideration of all circumstances, payment of additional fines and extension of thesis
submission date.

4.4. It shall be the responsibility of the student to bring any deviation in his status in matters of
course work, registration, withdrawal etc. to the attention of Dean (Academic) at the time of
semester registration, if s/he has not done so earlier.

4.5. A student may be exempted from semester registration by Dean (Academic) / Director if
s / he submits thesis within 30 days of scheduled semester registration. However, the student
will lose his fellowship (if any) during the said period. If s/he fails to submit t h e thesis within
30 days, s / he must do t h e semester registration before the thesis is accepted for evaluation.

5.0. Registration

5.1. Every student enrolled in the Ph.D. program is given provisional registration soon after his
enrolment. The provisional registration defines:

(a) The broad area of research and


(b) The course work to be carried out by the student.

The student continues to work for close to a year before his research plan is properly
formulated.

5.2 A Ph.D. student, provisionally registered, will be formally registered ( v i d e A n n e x u r e –


V ) for the degree of Ph.D. on completion of following steps:

(a) The candidate has successfully completed all assigned course works,

7
(b) Worked out a road map of the program and submitted a formal work plan to the DSC and

(c) Delivered an open seminar to the satisfaction of the DSC.

5.3. Subsequent to obtaining a favourable recommendation from the DSC, the PhD
registration fee, as applicable at the time, shall be paid by the candidate. The date when the
candidate deposits the PhD registration fee shall be treated as the date of registration.

5.4. The registration of PhD candidates may be approved by Chairperson, Senate and be
ratified by the Senate in its subsequent meeting.

5.5. Candidates should normally present the registration seminar not later than two years from
the date of admission, failing which the registration shall be cancelled.

5.6. Any change in the title of PhD work shall have to be approved by the DSC not later than
three months before the date of submission of the final synopsis of the PhD thesis. The same
shall be notified to the office of Dean (Academic).

6.0 Course Work

6.1. Course work is compulsory for all students enrolled for Ph.D. program including those with
Master Degree in the same discipline.

6.2. All Ph.D. scholars are required to clear a course in Research Methodology. The DSC will
prescribe additional postgraduate level courses (vide Annexure – III). A fresh M. Tech./equivalent
student (degree awarded within the past five years) shall be assigned up to 12 credits of course work
in addition to Research Methodology. Candidates with B. Tech/M. Sc/ MA/ MCA/ older M. Tech
etc. shall be assigned up to 16 credit courses excluding Research Methodology. While this is a
general guideline, the DSC may decide on more credits to be completed. Online courses like
MOOCS, etc. shall also be considered.

6.3. All candidates admitted to the Ph.D. programs shall be required to complete the
coursework prescribed by the DSC within the first two semesters.

6.4. The research scholars will take courses based on the recommendation of the
supervisor/co-supervisor(s) and approved by the DSC. The list of courses to be taken by a
research scholar during a p ar t i c ul ar semester shall be endorsed by the DSC and informed
to the PG & Research Cell ( Academic Section) within seven days from the start of the
semester or within seven days from the date of admission. In case a course is taken from
another department, it is to be endorsed by the Head of the concerned department.

6.5. Ph.D. students enrolled in courses are subject to the same regulations as applicable to other
students in the courses with regard to attendance, discipline, assessment and grading.

6.6. The concerned teachers shall forward the grades of the research scholar at the end of a
semester to the Associate Dean (A&E) for publication of results.

6.7. They must pass each of these courses with at least C grade in a 7-point scale / equivalent. A
student shall get maximum three chances to pass a course assigned by the DSC.

8
7.0. Submission of Thesis

7.1. The research scholars of all categories shall normally submit their PhD thesis within a
period of five years from the date of registration for the PhD program. However, for
satisfactory reasons, the period may be extended, not exceeding two consecutive terms of one
year each. The extension shall have to be recommended by the DSC. In case, no extension for
registration is applied for, the registration shall automatically stand terminated at the end of
the above-stipulated period.

7.2. A research scholar shall submit his/her PhD thesis not earlier than two years from the date
of registration for the PhD program under normal circumstances.

7.3. Prior to submission, when the thesis is nearly ready and can comfortably be submitted
within three months the candidate will submit the synopsis of the thesis [typically 10
pages including tables, graphs and references] and present a seminar to an open audience,
which will include members of DSC. S of t an d h ar d c opies of the thesis should be submitted
to the members of the DSC at least one week before the date of the seminar.

7.4. The DSC shall assess the work through a pre-synopsis submission seminar in presence of
all supervisor/co-supervisor(s). It is mandatory that all the supervisor/co-supervisor(s) are
present during the seminar. The DSC should confirm that the student has completed the
required number of courses. The student shall respond to the suggestions of every DSC member.
If and when the DSC is satisfied with the extent of work done and the quality of the thesis
the candidate will be allowed to submit the thesis. The DSC shall forward one hard copy,
signed by the student and the supervisor/co-supervisor, and a soft copy of the synopsis of the
PhD thesis along with recommendations (vide Annexure - VII) to the office of Dean
(Academic).

7.5. The scholar must have at least two papers published / accepted for publication based
on his/her doctoral research in a SCI/SSCI/AHCI / Scopus/ Web of Science journal and
preferably two paper presentations in conferences/seminars before the submission of the
dissertation/thesis for adjudication, and produce evidence for the same in the form of
presentation certificates and/or reprints.

7.6. A general format and guidelines (vide Annexure - XIV) prepared from the Academic
Section of NIT Durgapur shall be used for writing PhD thesis.

7.7. Plagiarism check shall be made for PhD thesis to satisfy maximum permissible match of
20% excluding publications of the research scholar and corresponding supervisor/co-
supervisor(s). The plagiarism check certificate should be included in the thesis.

7.8. The thesis examination fee, as applicable at the time, shall be deposited, subject to
completion of all formalities.

7.9. The research scholar shall submit two copies of the PhD thesis with soft cover for
the external examiners to the office of the Dean (Academic) within three months from
the date of successful pre-synopsis seminar. The soft copy of the thesis shall be emailed to
Dean (Academic). After successful defense of the thesis and incorporation of revision as per
the comments of the examiners, the candidate shall submit one hardbound copy of the final
version and a soft copy of the PhD thesis to the office of Dean (Academic).

7.10. Electronic copies of the theses should be posted on Institute web site for wide distribution.
9
8.0. Examination of PhD Thesis [applicable to all students]

8.1. The DSC shall prepare and submit t wo panels of five external examiners each in the area
of the submitted research work each from India and abroad, to Dean (Academic) in hard and
soft copies, for t he appointment as external examiners of the thesis. The list must include the
name, designation, affiliation, full postal address, telephone number, email IDs and webpage
address of the examiners. The examiners should be selected by the DSC from amongst the
eminent faculty members or experts, Professors / Associate Professors/ Retired Professors /
Emeritus Professors, and researchers with Ph.D. in institutes / universities / research laboratories /
industries of repute. The area of his/her specialization is to be mentioned explicitly along with a
hyperlink to his/her web page. In the list of examiners from abroad, there shall be at least three
experts not of Indian origin. There should not be any conflict of interest in the selection of the panel
of examiners.

It shall also include the name and registration number of the research scholar, thesis title, the
department registered and the name of the supervisor/co-supervisor(s) etc. (vide Annexure -
VIII). Director as the Chairperson of the Senate shall select one external examiner each from
India and abroad from the recommended panel.

8.2. It is expected that the DSC submits the panels of examiners immediately after the
synopsis seminar to the Dean (Academic), so that the consent of examiners is obtained before
submission of the thesis.

8.3. Dean (Academic) will arrange to dispatch the synopsis to the external examiners by
email. On receipt of their acceptance to become the external examiner of the PhD thesis, the
Academic Section will arrange to dispatch the thesis to them by post. The soft copy of the
PhD thesis shall also be sent through email, if examiner (s) so desires. Normally, the
examiner will be required to submit the evaluation report within six weeks.

8.4. When a thesis is unanimously accepted by the board of examiners for the award of the
PhD degree (vide Annexure - IX), the scholar shall be required to defend the work in an
open seminar followed by a viva-voce conducted in presence of the external examiner
from India, DSC members and other interested persons (vide Annexure - X). It is not
mandatory for the co-supervisors from abroad to be present during the viva voce. In case the
Indian external examiner is not able to attend the seminar and viva-voce, Director shall appoint
an alternate examiner for the purpose from the existing panel of external examiners from
India. The defence of the thesis shall be held after at least three weeks from the date of
dispatch of the thesis.

8.5. If an external examiner does not respond within three weeks from the date of dispatch of
the synopsis or within three months from the date of dispatch of the thesis, Director may select
an alternate name from the recommended panel of Experts as the external examiner. The
examiners may be reminded of sending the report of the thesis after two months of dispatch of
the thesis.

The examiners may send the report on the thesis by email and / or post with a “confidential”
label on the mail.

8.6. If a thesis in the present form is not found to be acceptable by any one of the external
examiners for award of the PhD degree and is likely to be accepted after revision in line
with the modifications suggested by the external examiners in their report, the research

10
scholar must re-submit the thesis incorporating the suggested amendments within three months
from the date of the earlier decision of the DSC.

8.7. If a thesis is recommended by one external examiner for the award of the PhD degree
but is rejected by the other external examiner, the thesis may be sent to another
examiner. The DAC, if needed, may submit a fresh panel of external examiners. The research
scholar may submit another copy of the thesis after depositing an additional thesis
examination fee, as applicable at the time.

8.8. If a thesis is rejected by both the external examiners, the research scholar may submit a
fresh thesis after a period of one year from the date of the decision. The thesis examination fee
of as applicable at the time, shall be deposited again before the submission of the thesis. The
DAC will recommend a fresh panel of five external examiners in the area of the submitted
research work each from India and abroad for appointment as external examiners of the thesis.

9.0. Defense of Ph.D. work:

9.1. The Dean (Academic) shall invite the examiners, on approval of Chairman, Senate.

9.2. Open Ph.D. seminars and viva will be conducted at respective departments in presence of
DSC members.

9.3. Recommendations of the external examiner and DSC will be forwarded to the Dean
(Academic) for its onward submission to the Chairman, Senate.

10.0. Award of Degree

10.1. On the recommendation of the Doctoral Scrutiny Committee, the Senate or the
Chairperson, Senate (when the Senate is not sitting early) shall decide whether the candidate
should be awarded the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. If the Chairperson, Senate has approved
the award of degree, the award needs to be confirmed by the Senate.

10.2. A provisional degree certificate will be issued to the scholar on successful defense of the
thesis and approval of Chairperson, Senate. The final degree certificate will be issued in the
convocation or by any other mode approved by the Senate. The date of the defense
examination shall be the effective date of award of degree and will be mentioned in the
provisional certificate and degree certificate.

10.3. Any deliberate false statement or plagiarized text will lead to summary
disqualification, in addition to other punitive measures commensurate with the offence.
Degrees, even after being awarded, may be revoked if gross violation of academic ethics is
established.

11.0. Fellowship [applicable to all students]

11.1. Institute doctoral fellowships shall be governed by the rules of MHRD. When the number
of Institute fellowships is limited; they will be distributed among different
departments by the Director on recommendation of Dean (Academic). Generally, the
number of fellowships will be proportional to the faculty strength, but changes can be made to
ensure that the positions are filled to the extent possible.

11
11.2. In case of students awarded a scholarship by an external agency or from a research
project operating in the Institute; the provisions specified by the sponsor shall govern the rules.

11.3. The scholarship for the category A students shall normally be given initially for a period of
three years, which can be renewed on year-to-year b a s i s on satisfactory performance upto a
maximum period of 5 years (including project fellowship, if any) / tenure of the research
scheme. The scholarship shall, however, automatically be terminated after the date of PhD thesis
defence or 5 years from the date of enrollment whichever is earlier.

11.4. Enhancement in rate of fellowship, after two years of enrollment, may be considered
on successful assessment by the DSC and submission of report (vide Annexure - VI) to the
Dean (Academic) towards satisfactory progress in the research activity. The student will
submit a summary of the progress of the work to the Chairperson, DSC through the
supervisor/co-supervisor(s) and deliver an open seminar. In case the recommendation of the DSC
is not favourable, the candidate may deliver a fresh seminar after six months from the
previous one for consideration of enhancement in scholarship. Enhancement of scholarship shall
be effective from the date of successful enhancement seminar.

11.5. If a student with Institute fellowship fails to complete registration formalities within
24 months of enrollment, payment of fellowship will be suspended (with permanent loss)
till registration formalities are over.

11.6. All research scholars with fellowship (Institute sponsored / Externally funded, including
UGC/CSIR/DST, etc.) will be required to assist the Department in teaching activity (sessional,
laboratory etc.) and other academic activity for upto 8 hours per week; the quantum of such
contribution being decided by the administration from time to time.

11.7. Change of fellowship, other than project fellowship (due to completion of project duration),
shall not be permitted.

11.0. Leave rules [applicable to all students]

12.1. A research student, except when granted withdrawal by the Institute must attend to his
work on a whole time basis. The departments will maintain attendance record of the student. The
DSC will examine the attendance record of students, and if it is found unsatisfactory, will
recommend extension of minimum duration for submission of thesis, deregistration or
termination of studentship, as it thinks fit.

12.2. Research scholars other than Institute employee are eligible to enjoy 30 days leave as
and when necessary in a calendar year.

12.2.1. Request for the sanction of any type of leave, formal application should be addressed
to the HOD which should usually be recommended and forwarded by the supervisor before
availing any leave excepting exigencies.

12.2.2. The HOD and his/her office would take care of the leave applications and approvals.
The same office would also keep the records of the leave as usual and submits the attendance
report to the appropriate authority for scholarships or other grants. The HOD may refer
appropriate cases to the Dean (Academic) to issue leave certificate, as and when required, and
to settle and dispute or cases of exigency.

12
12.2.3. Leaves of research scholars under CSIR/UGC/DST sponsored research schemes and
other categories will be governed by the rules of the bodies, which provide financial support.

12.2.4. In case of medical leave, the Institute Medical Officer must endorse the medical
certificate.

12.2.5. Maternity and child care leave are applicable to female student only. A female student
is entitled to avail maternity leave for a maximum of 180 days and childcare leave for a
maximum of 60 days once during the tenure of their studentship. If availed, the loss of days
due to these leaves may be augmented by extending their registration period, by the same
number of days, on the basis of written prayer from the scholars to the Dean (Academic) with
due recommendation of DSC.

12.2.6. There will be no loss of scholarship/fellowship for the female students availing the
maternity and childcare leave but the total time period of scholarship will remain same and will
not be extended.

12.2.7. In all cases, an application for medical/maternity leave must be accompanied by all
relevant medical papers - prescriptions, admission and discharge reports, diagnostic reports,
medicine purchase slips etc.

12.2.8. All leave application must be filed within 3(three) working days after joining.

12.2.9. Absence without sanctioned leave will entail loss of financial assistantship for the
period of absence and may result in the termination of the students’ program.

12.3. There shall be no summer or winter vacation for research students.

12.4. For part of a year, the entitlement will be on pro-rata basis.

12.5. In matter of course work, leave rules applicable to other program will also be
applicable to PhD students.

13.0. Miscellaneous

13.1. All seminars and viva voce for the PhD program shall be open house, with a
notice normally circulated to all departments of the Institute at least seven days in advance.

13.2. All seminars; pre-registration, enhancement and pre-synopsis seminars must be conducted
within a maximum period of one month from the date of application by the candidate, subject
to concurrence of the DSC.

13.3. If the DSC finds the performance of the research scholar unsatisfactory, it will give
at least two warnings (in writing) to the candidate. If there is no improvement in her/his
performance even after the warnings, the DSC may recommend termination of the PhD program
for the scholar through DRPC for approval of the Senate.

13.4. The Institute may revise the fee structure from time to time.

13.5. The list of documents, which need to be submitted at various stages of Ph.D. program
starting from the time of admission are listed in Annexure - XI.
13
13.6. External c o - supervisors will submit a no objection certificate (vide Annexure - XII)
from their organization and willingness certificate (vide Annexure - XIII) from their end
during formation of DSC or at a time when appropriate.

14.0. Termination of Studentship [applicable to all students]

The studentship of a Ph.D. scholar may be terminated by the Senate on exceptional grounds.
They are:

• Recommendation of Institute‘s Disciplinary Committee.


• Failure to do semester registration.
• Failure to complete registration within two years from the date of enrollment.
• Poor progress as noted by DSC. Such a decision may be implemented only after approval
of the Senate.
• Prolonged absence (exceeding two months) from the Institute without p ri or i nt im ati on.

15.0. Transition issues

These revised regulations shall come into effect from Odd-Semester, 2018-19. Students
enrolled prior to this date shall be g e n e r a l l y covered by the regulation in vogue at the time of
their enrollment. However, some of the clauses in the present regulation shall be applicable to them
where these are specifically mentioned. The final decision on each specific issue will be taken
by the Senate (or Chairman Senate on its behalf), on case-to-case basis.

16.0. Exceptions

Notwithstanding anything stated in the rules, the Senate can make special provisions and
exceptions depending on the merit of a case. Such cases shall not be cited as precedence in future
occasions of similar nature, because two situations appearing similar may not be identical.

In emergency situations, the Director in capacity of the Chairman Senate, can exercise powers
of the Senate and discharge the functions of the Senate. Such decisions must be reported to
the Senate at its next meeting.

17.0: Committees / Functionaries

The following committees shall be constituted for the research program.

17.1: Research Academic Committee (RAC)

17.1.1: Constitution:

I. Dean (Academic) - Chairperson


II. Dean (R&C) - Members
III. Chairman of all DRPCs - Members
OR
Any one faculty (with Ph.D.) nominated by Chairman of respective DRPCs
IV. One representative with Ph.D. degree from industry / R&D organization - Member
V. Associate Dean (A&E) - Member
VI. Deputy Registrar (A&E) - Convener
14
17.1.2: Functions:

i. To consider the recommendations of the DRPC on matters relating to research program and
to make suitable recommendations to the Senate
ii. To ensure that all norms and regulations pertaining to research programme are strictly
followed
iii. To make periodic review of ordinances, regulations and instructions pertaining to
research program and to recommend to the Senate any modification thereof
iv. To review the academic performance and make suitable recommendations to the Senate
regarding the award of degrees
v. To conduct at least one meeting each semester and send the proceedings to Secretary, Senate
vi. The quorum for each meeting will be ten.

17.2 Departmental Research Program Committee (DRPC)

16.2.1 Constitution

i. Head of the Department - Chairperson


(In case, Head of the department does not possess PhD degree,
the Director shall nominate Chairperson)
ii. All faculty members of the department having PhD degree - Members
iii. One Professor from a premier national academic institution /
one expert from industry / R&D organization with PhD degree - Member

17.2.2: Functions

i. To ensure academic standard and excellence of the PhD program offered by the
department
ii. To assign the supervisor/co-supervisor(s) to the research scholar in consultation with the
Scholar and the supervisor/co-supervisor(s)
iii. To conduct admission test/ interview
iv. To consider any general matter related to the research program of the department
and propose change in policy pertaining to the PhD program.
v. The external expert to be present in the non-routine DRPC meetings where policy
decisions are recommended.

17.3 Doctoral Scrutiny Committee (DSC):

17.3.1: Constitution

i. Chairperson (DRPC)/ A senior Faculty member of the Department - Chairperson


(if Chairperson is a supervisor/co-supervisor)
ii. Two faculty members of the department having PhD degree - Members
iii. One faculty member i n t he r an k of Pr of essor / Associ at e - Member
P r o f essor having PhD from other department of the institute
degree, p r efer abl y havin g i nt er est i n r el ated ar ea of
research
iv. Concerned supervisor/co-supervisor(s) for the research scholar - Member(s)

15
17.3.2: Functions

There shall be a Doctoral Scrutiny Committee for each Ph.D. scholar. T he Supervisor shall
be the Convener of this Committee. This Committee shall have the following
responsibilities:

i. To review the research proposal and finalize the topic of research;


ii. To guide the research scholar to develop the study design and methodology of
research and identify the course(s) that he/she may have to do.
iii. To periodically review and assist in the progress of the research work of the research
scholar.
iv. A research scholar shall appear before the DSC once in six months to make a presentation
of the progress of his/her work for evaluation and further guidance. The six monthly progress
reports shall be submitted by the DSC to the Academic Section before each Semester
registration.
v. In case the progress of the research scholar is unsatisfactory, the DSC shall record the
reasons for the same and suggest corrective measures. If the research scholar fails to
implement these corrective measures, the DSC may recommend with specific reasons for
cancellation of the registration of the research scholar.
vi. To conduct registration, enhancement and pre-synopsis seminars, viva voce.
vii. To act as the examiners in the above seminars and viva voce.
viii. To oversee and advise on all matters related to the PhD work of the candidate

17.4. S upervisor/co-supervisor:

17.4.1: Functions:

i. To assign a topic for research to the research scholar in consultation with the Scholar
ii. To recommend the courses to be taken up by the research scholar
iii. To provide or arrange for facilities to carry out research and supervise the research scholar
for the entire research studies
iv. To monitor the progress of the research scholar.
v. To report to the DSC the performance of the student at the end of each semester
vi. To recommend a panel of PhD thesis external examiners to DSC.
vii. To forward all applications of the research scholar working under him to the DRPC

17.5. Central Admission Committee (CAC)

17.5.1: Constitution

i. Dean (Academic) - Chairman


ii. Chairman of all DRPCs - Members
iii. Associate Dean (A&E) - Member
iv. Deputy Registrar (A&E) - Convener

17.5.2: Functions

To prepare the final list of the selected candidates based on the selection lists prepared by the
departments and communicate it to the office of Dean (Academic).

16
18.0 Guidelines for Utilization of Contingency Grant for attending National/International
Conference/Lab visit etc.

The following guidelines shall be applicable for all research scholars (except sponsored
candidates):

18.1 The financial assistance shall be provided to a research scholar in different heads as
follows for attending National/International Conferences within India:

Head Eligibility Remarks


Registration Maximum upto Rs. 5000 On production of fee receipt
Fee
Travel Train(AC III Tier)/AC Bus (by As per actuals on production of ticket. In case the
the shortest route) scholar travels by flight or any other mode, the
reimbursement should be actual subjected to an
upper ceiling of 3- tier AC Train fare.
Local Travel Auto/Bus As per actuals subjected to an upper limit of
Rs 100 per day on production of bills/self-
certification

Lodging Hostel/Guest House/Hotel for Actuals subjected to a ceiling of Rs 1000 per day
the conference days plus one day
each prior to and after the
conference days
Per diem The conference days plus one Rs. 250 per day (No bills required)
day each prior to and after the
conference days
18.2 Maximum two conferences can be attended in a calendar year subjected to availability of
contingency grant.

18.3 A research scholar will be given the support provided he/she continues to be a student for at
least three months after attending the conference.

18.4 The scholar has to obtain an approval from competent authority before attending the
conference and should submit settlement of financial assistance granted by the Institute (by
listing all the expenses incurred in an orderly manner and duly enclosing all supporting
documents) within ten days to the Academic Section.

18.5 In case the purpose of the travel is for data collection/lab visit for conducting
experiments, the scholar will be permitted to travel within India, subjected to availability of
contingency grant, and the entitlements will be the same as that of conference travel within
India.

17

You might also like