Hot vs Cold: How Does the Temperature of Water

Affect the Dissolving Time of 3-in-1 Coffee.

Objective/s:
1. Observe the dissolving time of 3-in-1 coffee in both Cold and Hot water.
2. Describe how the temperature affects the rate of reaction.

Materials:
● 2 identical clear glass
● 200mL of cold water
● 200mL of hot water
● 2 teaspoons of 3-in-1 coffee

Procedure:
1. Prepare two identical clear glasses. Label the first glass as A and the second glass as B.
2. Pour 200mL of cold water into glass A and 200mL of hot water into glass B.
3. Using separate teaspoons, add 1 teaspoon of 3-in-1 coffee powder to each glass simultaneously.
4. Observe and take note any differences in the dissolving process between the hot and cold water.

Conclusion:
In this experiment, we observed that the hot water dissolves the solute (the 3-in-1 coffee) faster
than the cold cold water. We therefore concluded that heating the solvent (water) enhances its kinetic
energy due to high temperature, the increase of rapid motion means that the molecules of 3-in-1 coffee
will collide with the water molecules with high frequency and that the collisions occur with more force.

Photo documentation:

Photo 1.1: Preparing the materials.

Photo 1.2: Adding 200mL of cold water into glass A and 200mL of hot water into glass B.

Photo 1.3: Adding 1 teaspoon of 3-in-1 coffee powder to each glass.

 Photo 1.4: Observe the differences in the dissolving process.

Members:
Gajudo, Rainheart Kim Y.
Cortez, Shemia Lyka
Guira, Jackie Claire
Ignacio, Angel Eunice R.
Masujer, Krislyn Jhoy A.
Medriano, Via Mar G.
 Concentration Exploration: An Experiment with
Vinegar and Baking Soda Solutions

Objective/s:
1. Observe the reaction of the vinegar and baking soda combined
2. Describe how the effects of concentration affected the chemical reaction

Materials:
● 1 ½ teaspoon Baking soda
● 20 mL Vinegar
● 2 identical transparent cup/glass
● Measuring cups (if needed)

Procedure:
1. Get or prepare the two identical glasses and place them beside each other.
2. Put labels on each glass, A and B.
3. Prepare the vinegar and baking soda.
4. Put 20 mL of vinegar in each glass first. The two glasses must have an equal amount of solvent
(Vinegar).
5. Measure ½ teaspoon and 1 teaspoon of baking soda separately.
6. Simultaneously pour ½ teaspoon in the first glass and 1 teaspoon for the second.
7. Observe the reaction between the two.

Conclusion:
In this experiment, we concluded that the amount of solute has its significant effect on the
reaction of solution. In both glasses, chemical reactions occurred. The glass B, the glass with 1 teaspoon
of baking soda had more chemical reaction compared to the glass A with ½ teaspoon. Since concentration
of solutions depends on the amount of solute present in the reaction. The higher the amount of solute
dissolved, the higher concentration of solution. Therefore, between the two glasses with different solute
amounts, the glass B has the higher concentration.

Photo Documentation:

Photo 2.1: Preparing the materials.

 Photo 2.2: Adding 20 mL of vinegar in each glass.

Photo 2.3: Poured ½ teaspoon in the first glass and 1 teaspoon for the second.
 Photo 2.4: Observe what happened on both set-ups.

Members:
Gajudo, Rainheart Kim Y.
Cortez, Shemia Lyka
Guira, Jackie Claire
Ignacio, Angel Eunice R.
Masujer, Krislyn Jhoy A.
Medriano, Via Mar G.
 Chemical Reaction of Iron Nail and
Aluminum Foil with Muriatic Acid

Objective/s:
1. Determine the visible changes in the iron nail and aluminum foil when exposed to muriatic acid
and;
2. Describe how the nature of reactants affects the rate of reaction.

Material/s:
● 0.1 g iron nail
● 0.1 g aluminum foil
● 20 mL hydrochloric acid (muriatic acid)

Procedure:
1. Get two identical clear glasses. Label them as glass A and glass B.
2. Carefully pour 10 mL of muriatic acid into two separate glasses.
3. Take the iron nail and aluminum foil.
4. Drop the 0.1 g iron nail in glass A while also dropping the 0.1 g aluminum foil in glass B.
5. Allow the reaction to occur for a period of time.
6. Note your observations and any changes that occur in the experiment.

Conclusion:
In this experiment, it was observed that both the iron nail and aluminum foil undergo chemical
reactions upon contact with muriatic acid. We observed that when the aluminum foil was placed in the
muriatic acid, it was followed by bubbling and the eventual disappearance of the foil. On the other hand,
the iron nail produces bubbles and slightly changes its color. Glass A (aluminum foil and HCl) produces
more bubbles than the other glass because of the higher reactivity of aluminum compared to iron. It is the
presence of hydrogen ions in muriatic acid that allows it to react with metals.

Photo Documentation:

Photo 3.1: Preparing the materials.

 Photo 3.2: Adding 10mL of hydrochloric acid in both glass A and glass B.

Photo 3.3: Dropped the Aluminum foil and nail in hydrochloric acid and observe what happened
overtime

Members:
Gajudo, Rainheart Kim Y.
Cortez, Shemia Lyka
Guira, Jackie Claire
Ignacio, Angel Eunice R.
Masujer, Krislyn Jhoy A.
Medriano, Via Mar G.
 Comparison of Kremil S Dissolution Rates: Whole Tablet vs. Powdered Form

Objective/s:
1. Observe which tablet will melt first and;
2. Determine how the surface area affects rate of reaction

Material/s:
● 2 transparent identical glass
● 2 Kremil S tablet
● 200 mL water

Procedure:
1. Crush one Kremil S tablet into a fine powder.
2. Measure 100 mL of water in two separate containers or glasses.
3. Label the containers as A and B.
4. Simultaneously drop one whole Kremil S tablet into container A and add the powdered Kremil S
into container B.
5. Observe what happens in the two setups and record the time it takes for the Kremil S to be
completely dissolved in water.

Conclusion:
In this experiment, we therefore concluded that a powderized tablet will dissolve much faster
compared to the whole tablet. The powderized tablet has smaller particles and surface area. Rate of
reaction increases when surface area of the substance increases.

Photo Documentation:

Photo 4.1: Preparing the materials.

 Photo 4.2: Adding the powderized and whole tablet in bot glass A and glass B.

Photo 4.3: Observing what form of tablet will dissolve faster.

Members:
Gajudo, Rainheart Kim Y.
Cortez, Shemia Lyka
Guira, Jackie Claire
Ignacio, Angel Eunice R.
Masujer, Krislyn Jhoy A.
Medriano, Via Mar G.
 Catalyst Affecting the Rate of Reaction
of Chicken Meat With and Without Papaya

Objective/s:
1. Describe which chicken meat is more tender.
2. Determine how the presence of a catalyst affects the rate of reaction of the chicken meat.

Material/s:
● Chicken Meat (250 grams per set)
● Papaya
● Water
● Casserole

Procedure:
1. Peel the unripe papaya and cut it into small pieces.
2. Prepare two casseroles and put an equal amount of water on each of them.
3. Label each casserole as casserole A and the other as casserole B.
4. Put one set of chicken meat on casserole A and the other on casserole B.
5. Add the peeled papaya on casserole B.
6. Boil/cook the two sets of chicken for 20 minutes.
7. Observe the results.

Conclusion:
In this experiment, we found out that the chicken boiled with Papaya is more tender compared to
the chicken that was boiled without the Papaya. This is because of the enzyme of the Papaya called
papain, this enzyme helps in breaking down proteins in the meat, making it more tender. The Papaya
therefore acts as the catalyst in this reaction because it makes the rate of reaction faster.
Photo Documentation:

Photo 5.1: Preparing the materials.

Members:
Gajudo, Rainheart Kim Y.
Cortez, Shemia Lyka
Guira, Jackie Claire
Ignacio, Angel Eunice R.
Masujer, Krislyn Jhoy A.
Medriano, Via Mar G.