0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views8 pages

Attitude of Education Students Toward Including

Uploaded by

Ahmed Elhassan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views8 pages

Attitude of Education Students Toward Including

Uploaded by

Ahmed Elhassan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/282673126

ATTITUDE OF EDUCATION STUDENTS TOWARD INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH


DISABILITIES IN GENERAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS

Research · October 2015


DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1922.1200

CITATIONS READS

0 114

3 authors:

Ahmed Elhassan Hamid Hassan Abdulaziz Alasmari


Jazan University Jazan University
30 PUBLICATIONS 11 CITATIONS 6 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Eldood Yousif Ahmed


Jazan University
23 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

The problems that influence on use Instructional Media in the Classrooms of Pupils with Intellectual Disability. View project

The Specific Teaching Strategies among Children's with Learning Disabilities in resource rooms View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Eldood Yousif Ahmed on 09 October 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/277712934

ATTITUDE OF EDUCATION STUDENTS TOWARD


INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN
GENERAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS

ARTICLE · JANUARY 2015

READS

26

3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:

Abdulaziz Alasmari Ahmed Elhassan Hamid Hassan


Jazan University Jazan University
4 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS 26 PUBLICATIONS 5 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Available from: Abdulaziz Alasmari


Retrieved on: 09 October 2015
The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. www.american-jiras.com

ATTITUDE OF EDUCATION STUDENTS TOWARD INCLUDING


STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN GENERAL EDUCATION
CLASSROOMS

1
Ahmed Elhassan Hamid Abdulaziz Alasmari2 Eldood Yousif Eldood3

1.
University of Jazan / Special Education department /Jazan/K.SA/ E-mail address: [email protected]
2.
University of Jazan / Special Education department /. E-mail address: [email protected].
3.
University of Jazan / Special Education department /Jazan/K.SA/ E-mail address: [email protected].

ABSTRACT
Background: The notion of inclusive education has attained a great base in many countries around the world, so that
we conducted this study to examine students’ attitudes toward including students with disabilities with their typical peers
in general classrooms. Objective: The aims of this study are to verify attitude of education students toward including
disabilities in general education classroom, and to examine the influence for GPA, level and age on attitude of education
students toward inclusive. Methods: we used descriptive statistic methods. Questioner technique is used as method of
data collection. Study group include (800) education students from Faculty of Education School and (120) students were
selected randomly as study group sample. The data was analyzed by using SPSS program. Results: The attitude of
students toward including disabilities in general education classroom is positive, and it is significant (p<0.05). The GPA
influenced on attitudes of students toward inclusive. Conclusion: We demonstrated that an important factor in the
success of inclusive education is dependent upon education students’ attitude, because these are future teachers.
Key words: Attitude, inclusive, Education students, Disabilities.

1. INTRODUCTION

Special education has evolved through many phases, starting with isolation and punishment of people with disabilities
until their inclusion and acceptance, and it has passed through difficulties to reach the highest point of equality for people
who had been segregated from their typically developing peers [1]. So, the history of special education has had some
issues that can be considered as controversial arguments among general and special educators. Therefore, Inclusive
education is a relatively new notion that supports a paradigm shift in general schools from assisting students with
disabilities to teaching them in regular education classroom [2]. Although there are some limitations about research
conclusions that have not generally given adequate results, working toward inclusive education remains to develop
steadily among countries [3].
Inclusion involves students with disabilities learning with their peers in regular schools that adapt and change the way
they work in order to meet the needs of all students [4]. Many governments have considered deliberatively inclusive
education as an effective method of education for over than thirty years to educate students with and without disabilities
communally. However, general education teachers may experience some obstacles of applying inclusive education of
students with severe disabilities in general classes. Some of these obstacles might be the insufficient specialized or
proficient training at the college level, the deficiency of materials concerning students with disabilities in all courses and
the absence of training about safety aspects [5].
In the contrast, research indicates that placing children with disabilities in self- contained classrooms does not fully
facilitate learning for them, and that might reduce the chance for them to benefit. Research indicate that there are
failures in teaching new behaviors to children with disabilities in exclusive settings, for students with disabilities may not
observe the correct manners of educational, social, or other situations of performance [1]. To clarify, self- contained
environments, in which children with disabilities learn, practice and observe inappropriate behaviors, do not conduce
effectively to make the students with special challenges prepared for social activities and lives. Another example, if we
want to make a child who is diagnosed with autism socially interactive, we should place him in inclusive classes all the
school day, and make all children integrate with him and with each other in order to make him interact socially. Villa et
al. (2000) state that segregated schooling has not succeeded to teach children with special challenges appropriate
conducts and skills [1].

LITERATURE REVIEW
Many studies cared out about college students' attitudes toward inclusive education in different countries. There is a
study conducted by Mangope et al. (2013), it found that college students had moderately positive dispositions and

147
All articles published in The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences are the property of Atlantic Center for Research Sciences, and is protected by copyright laws.
See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Copyright © 2014, Atlantic Center for Research Sciences. All Rights Reserved
The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. www.american-jiras.com

attitudes to include individuals with disabilities in regular classes [6]. In addition, researchers found that college students
had more positive attitude about individuals with disabilities who showed shyness. There is a research study conducted
by Costello et al. (2013), showed that students' attitudes were more positive to inclusion in the first year of university
than in following years. Graduate students registered in postgraduate programs revealed more positive attitudes toward
including children with disabilities than undergraduate students [7]. There is a study conducted by Ahsan et al. (2012),
they revealed positive attitudes toward inclusive education to educate students who had verbal issues and students did
not successfully pass tests [8]. In addition, there is a study that was conducted by Sharma, Forlin et al. (2006), the
results were that the general Canadian educators showed the most positive dispositions toward including all students
with and without disabilities in general classes [4]. There a study implemented by Mongwaketse et al. (2013), they found
that most of college students revealed and sustained positive attitudes to include students with disabilities in general
classes [9]. There a study implemented by Taylor et al. (2012), it found that college students' attitudes were positive
[10]. There is a study implemented by Mdikana et al. (2007), researchers found that 60% of college students recorded
positive scores to educate pupils with disabilities in general classes while 27% of the students showed negative attitudes
and 16% were undecided [11].
Age, academic eligibility, level to educate can influence college students' attitudes toward inclusive education. There is a
study implemented by Woodcock (2013), researchers indicated elementary student educators revealed better attitudes to
include individuals with students specific learning disabilities than the secondary student did educators did. Researchers
believed that fluctuation in those attitudes might be attributed to including individuals with different disabilities in
elementary schools more than to be in secondary schools [12]. There is a study conducted by Sharmaa et al. (2009),
researchers found that trainee educators showed their wants to include pupils who only needed educational and physical
accommodations, and those students' educators revealed the least positive attitudes to educate pupils with behavioral
issues [13]. There is a study conducted by Griffin et al. (2012). Results indicated that positive attitudes were shown by
college students to educate or learn with individuals with special needs. Researchers considerably pointed out that
attitude were influenced by some factors such as gender and comfort level [14].
In this context, our study aimed to know attitude of education students toward inclusion and its relation with some
variables (GPA, age and level). The study problem is what the attitude of education students toward inclusion the
disabilities among normal students, and are GPA, age and level influenced in attitude of education students toward
inclusion.

Aims of the study: The study aimed to:

1- Know attitude of education students toward inclusion disabilities among normal students.
2- Examine the influence for GPA on attitude of education students toward inclusion.
3- Examine the influence for age on attitude of education students toward inclusion.
4- Examine the influence for level on attitude of education students toward inclusion.
To verify these aims the following question should be answering:
A- What are attitude of education students toward inclusion.
B- Can GPA influence attitudes of education students toward inclusion?
C- Can age influence on attitude of education students toward inclusion?
D- Can level influence on attitude of education students toward inclusion?

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS


2.1 Study site

Research Method: In this study, the descriptive analytic research technique was used.
Sample technic: We used the random sample method, the questionnaire was answered by (120) students during fall
2014-2015 (academic period) from three different departments: (40) from special education department, (40) from Art
education department and (40) from physical education department.
Tools Technique: we used two questionnaires as following: Students attitude questionnaire: formed by (50) item
designed by the researchers, this items were distributed in two different constructs that are positive attitude, and
negative attitude. With the objective of obtaining a trustworthy list of questions, some opinions from experts in this topic
were collected. The pilot tests in a random sub-sample of the university student community were made. The results were
analyzed and adjustments in form and format were made. Cronbach's alpha coefficient stability was (0.89).
Practical Procedures The principle of voluntarism was the precondition of participating in questioner. For the
questioner, an explanation was prepared. The aims of the research and how the study would be carried out were clearly
stated in it. In addition, it was emphasized that the identities of the participants would remain confidential. During the
questioner, written forms were used. Questioner took place about one month, from on 23/3/2015 to 23/4/2015.

2.2 Study Group

148
The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. www.american-jiras.com

The group formed from education students in faculty of education - Jazan University, that numbered about (800) male,
the average of age about 23.7 distributed in different specialize as in table 1.

Table 1: Shows the Study Group.


Department Frequency percent
Special Education 242 30.25%
Art Education 290 36.25%
Physical Education 268 33.50%
Total 800 100%

3. RESULTS

After analyzed the data the result are as following:

3.1 What are attitude of education students toward inclusion?

To answer this question the researchers used one sample T-test and table 2 shows the attitude of education students
toward inclusion. When we compare the average premise (90) with the mean (107.30), we found that mean greater than
average premise as phrases as in table 2, and this difference is significant at the level (0.05), because the level of
significant greater than SIG, and this means that the attitude of education students toward inclusion is positive.

Table 2: Shows the attitude of education students toward inclusion


variable Mean SD T SIG significant
Attitude 107.30 9.39 31.51 0.000 Positive significant
S.D = Standard deviation; T= T value; SIG = sigma value

3.2 What is an influence of GPA on attitude of education students toward inclusion?

For answer, this question the researchers used regression method, and table 3 shows the influences of GPA on attitude
of education students toward inclusion. After analysis the data, we found that the standardized coefficients value is
(0.20) (see table 3), the value of correlation coefficients is (0.48). These values are significant at level (0.01), because
the level of significant is greater than SIG. This means that the GPA influence on attitudes of education students toward
inclusion, and when GPA great the attitude is positive.

Table 3: Shows the influence of GPA on attitudes of education students toward inclusion.
Variable Dependent F R B SIG Standardized Coefficients
GPA Attitude 0.16 0. 48 2.04 0.0 0.20
GPA= Academic rate F= F value; R= correlation value; B= Regression value; SIG = sigma value.

3.3 What is influence of age on attitude of education students toward inclusion?

For answer, this question the researchers used regression method, and table 4 shows the influences of age on attitude of
education students toward inclusion. After analysis the data, we found that the standardized coefficients value is (0.07)
(see table 4), the value of correlation coefficients is (0.010). These values are not significant at level (0.01), because the
level of significant is less than SIG. This means that the age is not influence on attitudes of education students toward
inclusion.

Table 4: Shows the influence of age on attitudes of education students toward inclusion.
Variable Dependent F R B SIG Percentage
age Attitude 0.07 0.010 0.34 0.936 0.01
F= F value; R= correlation value; B= Regression value; SIG = sigma value.

3.4 What is influence of level on attitude of education students toward inclusion?

For answer, this question the researchers used regression method, and table 5 shows the influences of age on attitude of
education students toward inclusion. After analysis the data, we found that the standardized coefficients value is (0.04)

149
The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. www.american-jiras.com

(see table 5), the value of correlation coefficients is (0.036). These values are not significant at level (0.01), because the
level of significant is less than SIG. This means that the level is not influence on attitudes of education students toward
inclusion.

Table 5: Shows the influence of level on attitude of education students toward inclusion.

Variable Dependent F R B SIG Percentage


Level Attitude 0.281 0.036 0.367 0.598 0.04
F= F value; R= correlation value; B= Regression value; SIG = sigma value.

4.
DISCUSSION

Our study revealed that the attitude of education students toward inclusion is positive, this result in line with many
studies, a study conducted by Mangope, Mannathoko, & Kuyini [6], found that college students had moderately positive
dispositions and attitudes to include individuals with disabilities in regular classes. Study conducted by Costello, & Boyle
(2013), showed that students' attitudes were more positive to inclusion [7], there is a study conducted by Ahsan, M.,
Sharma, & Deppeler (2012), revealed positive attitudes toward inclusive education[8]. In addition, a study was conducted
by Sharma, Forlin & Earle (2006), showed that the most positive dispositions toward including [4]. There a study
implemented by Mongwaketse, & Mukhopadhyay (2013), found that most of college students revealed and sustained
positive attitudes to include students with disabilities in general classes [9]. a study implemented by Taylor, & Ringlaben
(2012), found that college students' attitudes were positive [10], a study implemented by Mdikana, Ntshangase, &
Mayekiso, T (2007), found that 60% of college students recorded positive scores to educate pupils with disabilities in
general classes [11], a study conducted by Griffin, Summer, McMillan, Day, & Hodapp, (2012) indicated that positive
attitudes were shown by college students to educate or learn with individuals with special needs[14] .
The researcher pointed that the benefits of inclusion education for children and families are; Families’ visions of a typical
life for their children can come true because all parents want their children to be accepted by their peers, have friends
and lead “regular” lives. Inclusive settings can make this vision a reality for many children with disabilities. Children
develop a positive understanding of themselves and others, when children attend classes that reflect the similarities and
differences of people in the real world, they learn to appreciate diversity, respect and understanding grow when children
of differing abilities and cultures play and learn together. Children learn important academic skills, in inclusion
classrooms, children with and without disabilities are expected to learn to read, write and do math, with higher
expectations and good instruction, children with disabilities learn academic skills. Friendships develop; schools are
important places for children to develop friendships and learn social skills, children with and without disabilities learn with
and from each other in inclusive classes and all children learn by being together, because the philosophy of inclusive
education is aimed at helping all children learn, everyone in the class benefits. Children learn at their own pace and style
within a nurturing learning environment.
For disadvantages of inclusion, we can be supported inclusion by using technology in order to successfully make all
students integrated in their learning and technology can have a positive impact on the learning of students with special
needs.
In addition, our study revealed that the GPA influence on attitudes of education students toward inclusion, this means
when students had high degree on GPA their attitude is positive, the researchers pointed that students with high degree
on GPA are uncomfortable with the idea of isolating the student from the general population.
Finally, the study revealed that the age and level are not influence on attitudes of education students toward inclusion.
This result is against some studies, some studies found that age and level to educate can influence college students'
attitudes toward inclusive education, a study implemented by Woodcock (2013), indicated that elementary student
educators revealed better attitudes to include individuals with students specific learning disabilities than the secondary
student did educators did [12]. a study conducted by Sharmaa, Moorea, & Sonawaneb (2009), found that trainee
educators showed their wants to include pupils who only needed educational and physical accommodations, and those
students' educators revealed the least positive attitudes to educate pupils with behavioral issues [13]. The researchers
pointed that the reason of no influence is respondents are in a similar level in age and grade levels.

5. CONCLUSION

We conducted this study to find out the attitude of education students toward including students with disabilities in
general education classrooms; we used descriptive analytic method to verify the aims of study, questioner technic
followed to collect the data, we found that the attitude of education students toward inclusion is positive, the GPA
influence on attitudes of education students toward inclusion, the age and level are not influence on attitudes of
education students toward inclusion, we recommended that very important to apply the experience of inclusion in schools
both elementary and secondary school in K.S.A.

150
The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. www.american-jiras.com

6. REFERENCES
1. Villa R, Thousand J. Restructuring for Caring and Effective Education. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 2000.
2. Smith D. Childcare Providers Attitudes about Inclusion of Children with Special Needs. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, the University of
Toledo, Ohio.2010.
3. Kuyini A, & Mangope B. Student teachers attitudes and concerns about inclusive education in Ghana and Botswana. International
Journal of Whole Schooling. 2011; 7(1):20-37.
4. Sharma U, Forlin C, & Earle C. Pre-service teachers’ attitudes concerns and sentiments about inclusive education: An international
comparison of novice pre-service teachers. International journal of special education. 2006; 21 (2):80- 93.
5. Lambe J. Northern Ireland student teachers’ changing attitudes towards inclusive education during initial teacher training.
International journal of special education. 2007; 22 (1):59-71.
6. Mangope B, Mannathoko M, & Kuyini A. Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers and Inclusive Education: Attitudes, Concerns and
Perceived Skill Needs. International Journal of Special Education. 2013; 28 (3):82-92.
7. Costello S, & Boyle C. Pre-service Secondary Teachers’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education. Australian Journal of Teacher
Education. 2013; 38(4):129- 143.
8. Ahsan M, Sharma U, & Deppeler J. Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceived Teaching-Efficacy, Attitudes and Concerns about
Inclusive Education in Bangladesh. International Journal of Whole Schooling. 2012; 8 (2):1-20.
9. Mongwaketse M, & Mukhopadhyay S. Botswana PGDE Student Teachers’ Attitude towards Inclusive Education: Implication for
Teacher Education. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education. 2013; 2(1):36-46.
10. Taylor R, & Ringlaben R. Impacting Pre-service Teachers’ Attitudes toward Inclusion. Published by Canadian Center of Science and
Education. 2012.
11. Mdikana A, Ntshangase S, Mayekiso T. Pre-Service Educators’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education. International Journal of
Special Education. 2007; 22(1):125- 131.
12. Woodcock S. Trainee Teachers’ Attitudes towards Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Australian Journal of Teacher
Education. 2013; 38(8):16- 29.
13. Sharma U, Moore D, & Sonawane S. Attitudes and concerns of pre-service teachers regarding inclusion of students with disabilities
into regular schools in Pune, India', Asia. Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 2009; 37(3):319-331.
14. Griffin M, Summer A, McMillan E, Day T, & Hodapp R. Attitudes toward including students with intellectual disabilities at college.
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. 2012; 9(4):234-239.

Cite this article: Hassan AE.H Alasmari Abd Yousif Eld.Eld ATTITUDE OF EDUCATION STUDENTS TOWARD INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH
DISABILITIES IN GENERAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS. The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. 2015; 1(4):147-151.
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,
which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different
terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

151
The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. www.american-jiras.com

152

View publication stats

You might also like