The given table charts delineate the information about the reasons why folks quit smoking

and at what time they intend to give up. The data has been calibrated in percentage.

Overall, it is evident that the most potent reason for giving up smoking is health concerns,
while maximum smokers have plans to quit smoking within the next six months.

To begin with, the maximum number of individuals who quit smoking for better health is
71%, followed by less risk of getting smoking-related diseases and having health problems at
present; their figures were 25% and 12%, respectively. The ratio of financial consideration,
which represents 31%, is approximately double that of family pressure.

In regards to further information, 60 percent of smokers who smoke 20 or more cigarettes per
day intend to quit, compared to 10-19 cigarettes and fewer than ten cigarettes per day (73
%and 79 % each). Just 12% of group smokers plan to quit in the coming month, and around
one-fifth of them plan to quit in the coming years, whereas the highest number of people plan
to quit in the next six months.

Chat Gpt:
"The two graphs provide information about the reasons people choose to stop smoking and
when they intend to quit."

"Overall, it is evident that the main reason people decide to stop smoking is for better general
health. Additionally, the highest number of people intend to quit within the next 6 months."

"In the first table, the highest percentage of people who want to stop smoking do so for better
general health (71%). The figures for a reduced risk of smoking-related diseases and financial
considerations are lower, at 25% and 16%, respectively. Followed by family pressure and
health issues, which are around 15%."

"According to the second table, 60% of people who smoke 20 or more cigarettes per day
intend to quit, compared to those who smoke 10-19 cigarettes and fewer than 10 per day
(73% and 79%, respectively). Only 12% of this group plan to quit within the next month, and
approximately one-fifth of them plan to give up in the next year. The highest number of
people planning to quit within the next 6 months is 35%."

The bar chart shows changes in the amount of coffee produced in Brazil, Columbia,
Indonesia, and Vietnam between 1990 and 2010.

Overall, Brazil produced the most coffee out of all four countries in any given year, while
Vietnam tended to produce the least amounts. Additionally, Colombia was the only country
whose coffee production declined over the period.
In 1990, Brazil produced approximately 0.7 million tons of coffee, which was more than
three times greater than that of Indonesia and Vietnam, at 0.2 million and 0.1 million
respectively . Production continued to increase in Brazil, Indonesia, and Vietnam over the
measured period to reach 1.9 million, 0.4 million and 0.3 million tons respectively by the
year 2010.

Columbia, however, saw a decrease in coffee production over this period. In 1990, the
country produced 0.6 million tons of coffee, which gradually fell to 0.3 million tons of coffee
by 2010.

Chat Gpt:

"The bar chart illustrates the coffee production in different countries over a 20-year period
starting from 1990.

Overall, there was an increase in coffee production in three distinct countries, namely Brazil,
Indonesia, and Vietnam, while a gradual decline was observed in Colombia. Additionally,
Brazil consistently had the highest production over the period.

The quantity of coffee produced in Brazil started at around 0.7 tonnes in the initial year, after
which it experienced a rise to 1 tonne five years later. In contrast, there were opposite
changes in Colombia, starting at 0.6 tonnes before dropping to roughly 0.5 tonnes in 1995.
The coffee production in Indonesia and Vietnam remained nearly unchanged at 0.2 tonnes
and 0.1 tonnes, respectively, during the first five years from 1990.

Brazil's coffee production reached 1.5 tonnes, with a subsequent increase to around 1.9
tonnes in the last year, whereas the figure for Colombia constantly declined from 0.4 tonnes
to 0.3 tonnes. The figures for Indonesia and Vietnam slightly rose to 0.4 tonnes and 0.3
tonnes, respectively, in the final year."
The pie charts compare the four different ways from which Canada and Australia access
news. These sources include Television, Radio, Print, and Online.

Overall, news from TV and online acquired the highest position, while Radio at the least
among the given sources.

To begin with, Canadian people accessing news from television is 40% which is almost equal
to the percentage in Australia with just 3% less. Just above half of the Australians are
accessing the news through online mode, while 36% of Canadian people are getting it from
the internet.

Moreover, print media and radio were among the least popular modes of getting news across
Canada and Australia. The percentage of people accessing news from print in Canada stood
at 14%, which is exactly double the figure of Australians. Canada has 7% of news access
through radio, while only 2% in Australia. Additionally, the source is not specified among 2
to 3% of people in both countries.

Chat Gpt:
"The graph illustrates how people in Canada and Australia accessed news in four different
ways, including TV, Radio, Print, and Not specified.

Overall, TV and online are the highest positions for people to access news, while radio is the
least common among the examined sources.

To begin with, Canadian people accessing the news by TV account for 40%, slightly higher
than the figure for Australia, at 37%. Just around half of Australians access the news through
online, whereas Canadians getting them from the internet are at 36%.

Moreover, 14% is the percentage of people getting the news through print in Canada, exactly
double the figure for people living in Australia. The proportions of radio and not specified are
the least popular in both countries. Australia only has 2%, which is one-third of the
proportion in Canada. Additionally, the source is not specified, accounting for 2 to 3% of
people in both countries."
Dùng mạo từ:

"Accessed with news" nên là "Accessed news."

"With given examined sources" nên là "From the given examined sources."
Dấu phẩy:

"TV, Radio, Print, Not specified" cần thêm dấu phẩy giữa "Print" và "Not specified."
Số ít và số nhiều:

"TV and online are the highest position" nên là "TV and online are the highest positions."
"Just around half of Australians" nên là "Just around half of Australians are."
Dùng từ đúng:

"Getting those from the internet" nên là "Getting them from the internet."
"Which one-third of the proportion of Canada" nên là "Which is one-third of the proportion
in Canada."
Cấu trúc câu:

"Which are slightly higher than the figure for Australia, at 37%" nên là "Which is slightly
higher than the figure for Australia, at 37%."
Dùng từ đồng nghĩa:

"Getting the news by print" có thể thay thế bằng "Accessing the news through print."
Dùng dấu phẩy mô tả:

"Australia only has 2%" nên là "Australia only has 2%, which is one-third of the proportion
in Canada."

This graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK. Write a report for a
university lecturer describing the information in the graph.
The graph shows changes in the amount of fast food consumed in the UK between 1970 and
1990. Several trends are apparent. First, Britons are eating more and more fast food.
Secondly, the type of fast food has changed.

In 1970, the most popular fast food was fish and chips. Over 300g were consumed each
week. By 1990, however, this had fallen to just over 200g - a 50% drop. Consumption of
other fast foods such as pizza and hamburgers increased, however. The amount of pizza eaten
shot up from about 20g a week to more than 270g, overtaking fish and chips in the late 1980s.
Hamburger consumption also increased, rising from about 80g in 1970 to almost 300g in
1990.

Accompanying this change in the choice of foods was an increase in the amount of fast food
consumed. In 1970, British consumers ate about 450g a week of fast food. In 1990, on the
other hand, this had more than doubled, to 1000g.

Chat Gpt:
"The graph illustrates the consumption of junk food by the British population over a 20-year
period starting from 1970.

Overall, it is evident that the consumption of fish and chips and hamburgers increased, while
that of pizza declined over the period. Additionally, the most significant rise can be observed
in the consumption of fish and chips, surpassing that of pizza in 1980 and reaching its peak in
the final stage.

At the beginning, the number of hamburgers started at 25, after which it experienced a rise to
just under 100 ten years later. Similar changes can be observed in the consumption of fish
and chips, which increased from approximately 100 to 150 in 1980. The consumption of
pizza declined from 300 to 200 between 1970 and 1980.

The figure for pizza subsequently remained stable at 200, while the consumption of fish and
chips continued to increase ten years later. Similar changes, albeit to a lesser extent, can be
seen in the consumption of hamburgers, which grew from roughly 150 to 500, and from
about 100 to just under 300 in the final period."

Gốc: "The kine illustrates the amount of junk food consumed by the people who lived in
British during a 20-year period starting from 1970."
Sửa đổi: "The graph illustrates the consumption of junk food by the British population over a
20-year period starting from 1970."

Gốc: "Overall, it can be seen that the consumption of fish and chips and hamburger were
increased, while which of pizza declined over the period."
Sửa đổi: "Overall, it is evident that the consumption of fish and chips and hamburgers
increased, while that of pizza declined over the period."

Gốc: "Additionally, the most dramatic rise was can be seen in the figure for fish and chips,
surpassing those of pizza in 1980 to becoming the highest point in the final stage."
Sửa đổi: "Additionally, the most significant rise can be observed in the consumption of fish
and chips, surpassing that of pizza in 1980 and reaching its peak in the final stage."

Gốc: "In the begin, the number of hamburger started at 25, after which it experience a rise to
under 100 in 10 years later."
Sửa đổi: "At the beginning, the number of hamburgers started at 25, after which it
experienced a rise to just under 100 ten years later."

Gốc: "The number of pizza was declined from 300 to 200 between 1070 and 1980."
Sửa đổi: "The consumption of pizza declined from 300 to 200 between 1970 and 1980."
Chat GPT:

"The line graph illustrates crime rates/how much crime in three specific areas of Panama
City between 2010 and 2019. Overall, there was a decline in the burglary rates, while the
figure for car theft and robbery remained relatively stable over the nine-year period. In
addition, robbery rates consistently hit the trough during this given period.

The number of burglary crimes in Panama City started at just under 3500, dropping
significantly to 1000 in 2015. A similar trend can be seen in the figure for car theft offenses,
falling from around 2700 to above 2000 five years later. The figure for robbery crimes
witnessed a slight increase from approximately 700 to under 1000, before decreasing to 500
in 2015.

The number of robbery crimes fluctuated between 500 and approximately 700 in the next
four years. Conversely, the figure for burglary witnessed a considerable increase to
roughly 1400. The number of car theft crimes also rose significantly, reaching a peak of
around 2700 in the final period."

Ngữ pháp và Cấu trúc câu:

"the figure for robbery consistently peak the trough" - Đây là một cấu trúc câu không chính
xác. Có thể sửa thành "the figure for robbery consistently peaks and troughs."
"experienced a significantly dropped" - "dropped" ở đây là động từ quá khứ, nên nên sửa
thành "experienced a significant drop."
Sử dụng từ vựng:
"felling" - Có vẻ là có lỗi chính tả ở đây, có thể đây là "falling."
"witness a considerable increase" - Có thể sử dụng "witnessed" thay vì "witness" và thêm
"a" trước "considerable," nên là "witnessed a considerable increase."

"saw a significant rose" nên là "saw a significant rise."

Ngữ pháp và cấu trúc câu:

● "how many crime" nên là "how much crime."

Chính xác về thời gian:
● Một số diễn đạt về thời gian có thể làm cho nội dung của bạn trở nên không
chính xác. Ví dụ, "in 5 year later" nên là "five years later" để làm rõ khoảng
thời gian.

The table illustrates the top ten internet shoppers by province in 2016.

Overall, it is readily apparent that China was the home where citizens had access to the
Internet the most, while people in Mexico did not have access to the Internet. In addition, the
total population in India was also the highest.

Looking at the chart in more detail, the percentage of inhabitants in the UK accessing the
internet hit the highest point at 98,6%, followed by Japanese accounting for 91,1%. The US
became the third top agrarian in internet usage with 88,5% and the statistic is the same as
Germany with 88%. Conversely, India has just 34.8% of people using the Internet with the
total population, which is the lowest of the total survey. Furthermore, Mexico is the second
last bucolic to have Internet customers, 45,1% of its total population.
Regarding the total figure of Internet Users in the countries, China was at the top of the list
with more than 720 million customers. In contrast, India has the second-highest statistic of
online shoppers, with more than 460 million. Mexico had the lowest figure of purchasers in
the given countries with just 58 million buyers.

The three pie charts depict the data about the three sectors of coffee around the globe. It is
evident that Europe is a major nation that contributes to using coffee, South Africa is
manufacturing it, and profit expenditures are higher through the delivery service.

To begin with consumption, Europe is a major with 41%, While America is in second with
nearly somewhat less than half. Japan comprises 12 per cent whereas ,in minor usage, the rest
of the world uses only 8 per cent.

While considering manufacturing, South Africa is on top, making coffee in a proportion to

44. On the other hand, the other three countries are almost similar ratios: Indonesia (22%),
Japan (18%) and Vietnam (16%).

The last pie chart of profit distribution indicates different sectors of distribution in which,
delivery service gain more than a half, retails slightly a quarter and Exporters fifteen per cent.
Lastly, with less profit, producers only have a tenth of the profit.
The line graph displays the changes in temperature in three cities (Paris, Dubai and Sydney)
in different months of the year. Temperature is measured in Celsius degrees.

Overall, the weather pattern in Sydney is quite the opposite of Dubai and Paris. Furthermore,
Paris is the coldest city among the three.

To begin with, the temperature in Paris never goes above 20 degrees. In contrast, Dubai
seldom sees its temperature below this level, except for January (19 degree C). However,
despite the striking differences, the temperatures in Paris and Dubai still have some
similarities, as they rise continually from the beginning of the year to reach a peak in August.
The highest temperatures in Paris and Dubai are 20 and 36 degrees, respectively. Afterwards,
both cities became colder and the temperature fell steadily. As can be seen, the differences in
temperature between August and December in both Paris and Dubai are the same, 15 degrees
celsius.

Regarding Sydney, it witnesses 24 degree temperature in January. From there, the

temperature drops continuously before going down to the lowest point of 14 degrees in July.
The five remaining months see the temperature increase dramatically, to reach 23 degrees by
the end of the year.
The bar graph displays the proportions of expenditures on five significant purposes in four
distinct countries in 2009.

Generally, in 2009, housing occupied the largest amount of spending, whereas health care
accounted for the smallest proportion, except in the US, where people spent the sparsest
amount of money on clothing.

Specifically, 26% of the Americans’ budget, the highest figure among the four nations, was
expended on accommodation, followed by transportation (19%) and food (14%). Health care
expenditures constituted 8%, doubling that of fashion.

In Canada, citizens allocated 21% of their financial resources to housing, with transportation
coming in a close second at 20%. Food accounted for 15%, while medical care and clothing
occupied more or less a third of that level.

24% of the UK’s spending went to housing, 21% to food, and 15% to transportation. Health
care and fashion funds were marginal (2% and 5%, respectively), similar with the previous
countries.

The Japanese allotted the majority of their money to food, at 23%, making this country the
top in this category. Accommodation followed closely, at 22%, while the other categories
registered much lower shares (10% for transportation, and 5% for medical care and fashion).
The chart compares the number of individuals using mobile phones and landlines across
seven selected countries, including Canada, the US, Germany, Denmark, the UK, Sweden,
and Italy.

Overall, what stands out from the bar chart is that the highest mobile phone usage is observed
in Italy. Another notable point is that the number of landlines used in Denmark exceeds that
of the other six countries.

The top four countries' phone usage are Denmark, UK, Sweden, and Italy, with over 80
citizens, around 85 citizens, over 85 citizens and 90 citizens respectively. Meanwhile, the
figures for landlines in the UK and Sweden are slightly lower than the number of mobile
phones, just below 60 and around 70 respectively. However, this statistic for Italy is
significantly lower, accounting for nearly half the number of phones, at approximately 42. On
the other hand, Denmark sees a reversed trend, residents using landlines are higher, just
below 90 people.

During the same time frame, the respective number of people using phones in Canada, US
and Germany are only 39, under 50 and around 70. As for landlines, Canada and US have
witnessed a rapidly higher number, over 60 people and around 70 people, in contrast, the
number allocated to landlines in Germany is lower, at only 60 people.
The line graph compares the two genders in terms of their smoking rate per 1000 people in
Someland within the timespan of 40 years, commencing from 1960.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were significant changes in the number
of people who smoked of the two genders shown on the graph. Another striking feature is
that the number of males saw a dramatic decrease over the 40-year period, while the rate of
females increased slightly.

In 1960, men preferred smoking, at 600 people, whereas only around 100 women smoked.
Over the following 15 years, the number of females who smoked reached 300 people;
however, the figure for males dropped by 100 people.

From 1975 to 1990, the smoking rate of the two genders fluctuated rapidly, hovering at
around 400 people and approximately 300 respectively. By 2000, the number of men who
smoked fell to only 350 people, while the figure for women saw a slight drop to 200 people.