Law of Torts - For Internal 2
Law of Torts - For Internal 2
PART A&B
TH
Ans:- contributory negligence
AN
2.When private action lies in public nuisance?
Ans:-when plaintiff demonstrate that they have suffered a special and particular damage
beyond that suffered by the general public.
AK
3.The doctrine of Res ispa loquitor allows plaintiff to establish?
Ans:-Rebuttable presumption
DR
5.The rule regarding principle of negligence was laid down in the leading case
of?
Ans:- Donoghue v Stevenson in 1932.
CH
Ans- 1. Sturges v Bridgman (1879): Established the principle that whether a particular
activity constitutes a nuisance depends on the locality.
2. Rylands v Fletcher (1868): Established the strict liability rule for the escape of
dangerous substances onto neighboring land.
3. Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd (1961): Defined nuisance as an unreasonable
interference with the use and enjoyment of land.
4. Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc (1994): Established the
foreseeability test for determining liability in cases of environmental nuisance.
5. Transco Plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (2004): Clarified the distinction
between private and public nuisance.
7.Defamation
Ans:-Defamation is a tort that involves the publication of a false statement that harms a
person's reputation.
8.Negligence
TH
9.Trespass to land
Ans:-Trespass to land is a tort where someone unlawfully enters or interferes with another
AN
person's land or property. It involves intentionally entering someone else's land without
permission. In some jurisdictions, laws such as Section 441 of the Indian Penal Code define
and penalize trespass to land.
AK
10.Trespass to goods :
DR
Ans:-Trespass to goods is a tort where someone unlawfully interferes with another person's
personal property or goods. It involves intentionally interfering with the possession of
someone else's goods without permission. In some legal systems, laws such as Section 405
AN
of the Indian Penal Code address trespass to goods and prescribe penalties for such
actions.
11.Nervous shock
CH
Ans:-Nervous shock, also known as emotional distress or mental anguish, is a tort where
someone suffers a psychiatric injury as a result of witnessing a traumatic event or being
subjected to extreme stress. It can occur even if there is no physical injury involved. In
some jurisdictions, laws and precedents provide remedies for victims of nervous shock,
typically in cases where there is a close relationship between the victim and the traumatic
event or the person causing the distress.
PART C
TH
3.What are the defences to defamation?
AN
1. Truth: If the statement in question is true, it is generally not considered defamatory
because truth is an absolute defense against defamation.
2. Absolute Privilege: Statements made in certain contexts, such as judicial
proceedings, legislative debates, or between spouses, are considered absolutely privileged
AK
and cannot form the basis of a defamation claim.
3. Qualified Privilege: Statements made in good faith and for a legitimate purpose, such
as in the interest of public duty or in self-defense, may be protected under qualified
DR
comment.
5. Consent: If the plaintiff consented to the publication of the allegedly defamatory
statement, they may not have grounds for a defamation claim.
These defenses provide individuals with legal protections against defamation claims
CH
4.What is Defamation?
Ans:- Defamation is a tort in which one party makes a false statement that harms the
reputation of another person or entity in eyes of a third person . It can be either spoken
(slander) or written (libel). To constitute defamation, the statement must be conveyed to a
third party, be false, and result in harm to the reputation of the person or entity targeted.
5.What is Nuisance?
Ans:- Nuisance, refers to an unreasonable interference with a person's use or enjoyment of
their property. It can manifest as either a private nuisance, affecting specific individuals or
properties, or a public nuisance, affecting a larger community or the general public.
Examples include excessive noise, offensive odors, or pollution.
TH
3)Possession Order: In cases where the trespasser refuses to leave the land, the
landowner may seek a possession order from the court to regain control of their property.
These remedies aim to compensate the landowner for the intrusion and protect their
AN
rights to use and enjoy their land.
AK
7.What do u understand by continuing Trespass?
is called continuing trespass till it is removed from the place. The right to sue in such cases
will continue from day one till it is removed. In the case of Holmes v. Wilson, (1839) 10
Ad&E 503, it was held that recovery of damage in the first action, by way of satisfaction
does not operate as a purchase of the right to continue the injury.
AN
Ans:- Trespass ab initio, refers to a legal principle where a lawful entry onto someone's
property becomes unlawful due to a subsequent wrongful act committed while on the
property. This principle is recognized in common law jurisdictions.
Ans:-Distress damage feasant is a legal doctrine in tort law that allows a landowner to take
possession of personal property found on their land when the property owner has
unlawfully caused damage while it was on the land. This doctrine permits the landowner to
hold the property as security for the damages caused until the owner pays compensation or
retrieves the property.