Chap 9 Entry Modes
Chap 9 Entry Modes
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Exporting, importing and countertrade
Contractual entry modes
Investment entry modes
Strategic alliances
Strategic factors in selecting an entry
mode
14-2
What Are The Basic Decisions Firms
Make When Expanding Globally?
Firms expanding internationally must decide
1. Which markets to enter
2. When to enter them and on what scale
3. Which entry mode to use
exporting
licensing or franchising to a company in the host nation
establishing a joint venture with a local company
establishing a new wholly owned subsidiary
acquiring an established enterprise
14-3
What Influences
The Choice Of Entry Mode?
Several factors affect the choice of entry mode
including
transport costs
trade barriers
political risks
economic risks
costs
firm strategy
The optimal mode varies by situation – what
makes sense for one company might not make
sense for another
14-4
Which Foreign Markets
Should Firms Enter?
The choice of foreign markets will depend on their long
run profit potential
Favorable markets
are politically stable
have free market systems
have relatively low inflation rates
have low private sector debt
Less desirable markets
are politically unstable
have mixed or command economies
have excessive levels of borrowing
Markets are also more attractive when the product in
question is not widely available and satisfies an unmet
need
14-5
Timing of Entry
Question: When Should A Firm Enter A
Foreign Market?
Once attractive markets are identified, the
firm must consider the timing of entry
1. Entry is early when the firm enters a
foreign market before other foreign firms
2. Entry is late when the firm enters the
market after firms have already
established themselves in the market
14-6
Why Enter A
Foreign Market Early?
First mover advantages include
the ability to pre-empt rivals by establishing a
strong brand name
the ability to build up sales volume and ride
down the experience curve ahead of rivals and
gain a cost advantage over later entrants
the ability to create switching costs that tie
customers into products or services making it
difficult for later entrants to win business
14-7
Why Enter A
Foreign Market Late?
First mover disadvantages include
pioneering costs - arise when the foreign
business system is so different from that in a
firm’s home market that the firm must devote
considerable time, effort and expense to
learning the rules of the game
the costs of business failure if the firm, due
to its ignorance of the foreign environment,
makes some major mistakes
the costs of promoting and establishing a
product offering, including the cost of
educating customers
14-8
Scale of Entry
After choosing which market to enter and the
timing of entry, firms need to decide on the scale
of market entry
entering a foreign market on a significant scale is a
major strategic commitment that changes the
competitive playing field
Firms that enter a market on a significant scale
make a strategic commitment to the market - the
decision has a long term impact and is difficult to
reverse
small-scale entry has the advantage of allowing a firm
to learn about a foreign market while simultaneously
limiting the firm’s exposure to that market
14-9
Is There A “Right” Way To
Enter Foreign Markets?
No, there are no “right” decisions when
deciding which markets to enter, and the
timing and scale of entry - just decisions
that are associated with different levels of
risk and reward
Firms in developing countries can learn
from the experiences of firms in developed
countries
14-10
Entry Modes
Question: What is the best way to enter a
foreign market?
Answer:
Firms can enter foreign market through
1. Exporting
2. Turnkey projects
3. Licensing
4. Franchising
5. Joint ventures
6. Wholly owned subsidiaries
Each mode has advantages and disadvantages
Entry Modes
These are six different ways to enter a foreign
market
1. Exporting - common first step for many
manufacturing firms
Later, firms may switch to another mode
14-12
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade
(1 of 6)
Source: Based on trade data found on International Trade Administration website (www.trade.gov).
Exporting, Importing, and Countertrade
(3 of 6)
Countertrade
Types of Countertrade
Barter
Counterpurchase
Offset
Switch Trading
Buyback
Entry Modes
3. Licensing - a licensor grants the rights to
intangible property to the licensee for a specified
time period, and in return, receives a royalty fee
from the licensee
intangible property includes patents, inventions,
formulas, processes, designs, copyrights, trademarks
14-17
License to Thrill
Marvel Enterprises
(www.marvel.com)
A global character-
based entertainment
licensing company
Licenses characters for
films and products
Earns royalties from
licensing agreements
Marvel International:
licensing in strategic
international markets
Entry Modes
4. Joint ventures with a host country firm - a firm
that is jointly owned by two or more otherwise
independent firms
most joint ventures are 50:50 partnerships
14-19
Strategic Factors in Selecting an Entry
Mode
Selecting Partners for Cooperation
Cultural Environment
Political and Legal Environments
Market Size
Production and Shipping Costs
International Experience
Types of Entry Modes
Contractual Entry Modes
Export, Licensing, Francising
14-21
Why Choose Exporting?
Exporting is attractive because
it avoids the costs of establishing local manufacturing
operations
it helps the firm achieve experience curve and location
economies
Exporting is unattractive because
there may be lower-cost manufacturing locations
high transport costs and tariffs can make it
uneconomical
agents in a foreign country may not act in exporter’s
best interest
14-22
Why Choose A
Turnkey Arrangement?
Turnkey projects are attractive because
they are a way of earning economic returns from the
know-how required to assemble and run a
technologically complex process
they can be less risky than conventional FDI
Turnkey projects are unattractive because
the firm has no long-term interest in the foreign country
the firm may create a competitor
if the firm's process technology is a source of
competitive advantage, then selling this technology
through a turnkey project is also selling competitive
advantage to potential and/or actual competitors
14-23
Why Choose Licensing?
Licensing is attractive because
the firm avoids development costs and risks associated
with opening a foreign market
the firm avoids barriers to investment
the firm can capitalize on market opportunities without
developing those applications itself
Licensing is unattractive because
the firm doesn’t have the tight control required for
realizing experience curve and location economies
the firm’s ability to coordinate strategic moves across
countries is limited
proprietary (or intangible) assets could be lost
to reduce this risk, firms can use cross-licensing agreements
14-24
Why Choose Franchising?
Franchising is attractive because
it avoids the costs and risks of opening up a foreign
market
firms can quickly build a global presence
Franchising is unattractive because
it inhibits the firm's ability to take profits out of one
country to support competitive attacks in another
the geographic distance of the firm from franchisees can
make it difficult to detect poor quality
14-25
Why Choose Joint Ventures?
Joint ventures are attractive because
firms benefit from a local partner's knowledge of local conditions,
culture, language, political systems, and business systems
the costs and risks of opening a foreign market are shared
they satisfy political considerations for market entry
Joint ventures are unattractive because
the firm risks giving control of its technology to its partner
the firm may not have the tight control to realize experience curve
or location economies
shared ownership can lead to conflicts and battles for control if
goals and objectives differ or change over time
14-26
Why Choose A
Wholly Owned Subsidiary?
Wholly owned subsidiaries are attractive because
they reduce the risk of losing control over core
competencies
they give a firm the tight control over operations in
different countries that is necessary for engaging in
global strategic coordination
they may be required in order to realize location and
experience curve economies
Wholly owned subsidiaries are unattractive
because
the firm bears the full cost and risk of setting up
overseas operations
14-27
Which Entry Mode Is Best?
Activities:
14-28
How Do Pressures For Cost
Reductions Influence Entry Mode?
When pressure for cost reductions is high,
firms are more likely to pursue some
combination of exporting and wholly owned
subsidiaries
allows the firm to achieve location and scale
economies and retain some control over
product manufacturing and distribution
firms pursuing global standardization or
transnational strategies prefer wholly owned
subsidiaries
14-29
Which Is Better –
Greenfield or Acquisition?
The choice depends on the situation confronting
the firm
1. A greenfield strategy - build a subsidiary from
the ground up
greenfield venture may be better when the firm needs
to transfer organizationally embedded competencies,
skills, routines, and culture
2. An acquisition strategy – acquire an existing
company
acquisition may be better when there are well-
established competitors or global competitors
interested in expanding
14-30
Pros and Cons of Acquisitions
Acquisitions are attractive because
they are quick to execute
they enable firms to preempt their competitors
they may be less risky than greenfield ventures
Acquisitions can fail when
the acquiring firm overpays for the acquired firm
the cultures of the acquiring and acquired firm clash
attempts to realize synergies run into roadblocks and take much
longer than forecast
there is inadequate pre-acquisition screening
To avoid these problems, firms should
carefully screen the firm to be acquired
move rapidly to implement an integration plan
14-31
Pros and Cons of Greenfield
Ventures
The main advantage of a greenfield venture is
that it gives the firm a greater ability to build the
kind of subsidiary company that it wants
However, greenfield ventures
are slower to establish
are risky because they have no proven track record
can be problematic if a competitor enters via
acquisition and quickly builds market share
14-32
Strategic Alliances
Strategic alliances refer to cooperative
agreements between potential or actual
competitors
example:
formal joint ventures
short-term contractual agreements
the number of strategic alliances has
exploded in recent decades
14-33
Why Choose
Strategic Alliances?
Strategic alliances are attractive because they
facilitate entry into a foreign market
allow firms to share the fixed costs and risks of
developing new products or processes
bring together complementary skills and assets that
neither partner could easily develop on its own
help a firm establish technological standards for the
industry that will benefit the firm
But, the firm needs to be careful not to give away
more than it receives
14-34