11 - Basic Calculus
11 - Basic Calculus
Descartes ~ 1640
2. Exponents – Basic Definitions and Properties
( 9)
Properties of Exponents
(0, 3)
( 1.5, 0)
2.
y= x
This graph is the parabola y = x2 up to and including the
point (1, 1), then picks up with the curve y = x3 after
that. Note that this function is therefore continuous at
x = 1, and hence for all real values of x. y = ln(x)
1
lim = 0.
P( 5, 25), mtan = 10
P(4, 16), mtan = 8
x 0 x 0
secant lines
tangent line
10
Properties of Derivatives
1 dy 1 1
Logarithm Rule
11 12
5. Applications: Estimation, Roots and Maxima & Minima, Related Rates
13 14
Notice the extremely rapid convergence to the root. In fact, it can be shown that the small
error (between each value and the true solution) in each iteration is approximately squared in the
next iteration, resulting in a much smaller error. This feature of quadratic convergence is a
main reason why this is a favorite method. Why does it work at all? Suppose P0 is a point on
the graph of f(x), whose x-coordinate x 0 is reasonably close to a root. Generally speaking, the
tangent line at P0 will then intersect the X-axis at a value much closer to the root. This value x1
can then be used as the x-coordinate of a new point P1 on the graph, and the cycle repeated until
some predetermined error tolerance is reached. Algebraically formalizing this process results in
the general formula given above.
If a function f(x) has either a relative maximum (i.e., local maximum) or a relative minimum
(i.e., local minimum) at some value of x, and if f(x) is differentiable there, then its tangent line
must be horizontal, i.e., slope m tan = f (x) = 0. This suggests that, in order to find such relative
extrema (i.e., local extrema), we set the derivative f (x) equal to zero, and solve the resulting
algebraic equation for the critical values of f, perhaps using a numerical approximation
technique like Newton’s Method described above. (But beware: Not all critical values
necessarily correspond to relative extrema! More on this later…)
Example (cont’d): Find and classify the critical points of y = f(x) = x 3 – 21 x 2 + 135 x – 220.
Once obtained, it is necessary to determine the exact nature of these critical points. Consider the
first critical value, x = 5, where f = 0. Let us now evaluate the derivative f (x) at two nearby
values that bracket x = 5 on the left and right, say x = 4 and x = 6. We calculate that:
m tan(4) = f (4) = +15 > 0, which indicates that the original function f is increasing at x = 4,
m tan(6) = f (6) = –9 < 0, which indicates that the original function f is decreasing at x = 6.
Hence, as we move from left to right in a local neighborhood of x = 5, the function f(x) rises,
levels off, then falls. This indicates that the point (5, 55) is a relative maximum for f, and
demonstrates an application of the “First Derivative Test” for determining the nature of critical
points. In an alternate method, the “Second Derivative Test,” we evaluate f (x) = 6 x – 42 at
the critical value x = 5, i.e.,
f (5) = –12 < 0, which indicates that the original function f is concave down (“spills”) at this value.
Hence, this also shows that the point (5, 55) is a relative maximum for f, consistent with the above.
Exercise: Show that: (1) f (8) < 0, f (10) > 0 First Derivative Test
(2) f (9) > 0. Second Derivative Test
In either case, conclude that the point (9, 23) is a relative minimum for f.
15 16
F(x)
10
10
10
17 18
9 u 10
du = + C
10
Properties of Integrals
u 1/2
du = u+1/2
+ C
1/2
1+x 3 3
1
u du = ln |u| + C
eu du = eu + C
19 20
7. Differential Equations
(2, 5)
(0, y )
+ ] [
x=1 u=0
x=0 u=1
(0, y0)
u2 du