Ch06 Project Activity and Risk Planning
Ch06 Project Activity and Risk Planning
Project Activity
and
Risk Planning
Part II
Project Planning
Textbook’s Organization
Project Management
Ch. 1: Projects in
Contemporary Organizations
Ch. 2: Strategic Management Ch. 6: Project Activity Ch. 10: Monitoring and
and Project Selection and Risk Planning Information Systems
2-3
Overview
6-4
Initial Project Coordination and the
Project Charter
6-5
Initial Project Coordination and the
Project Charter
6-6
Initial Project Coordination and the
Project Charter
continued
6-7
Outside Clients
6-8
Project Charter Elements
Project plans have the following elements:
Purpose: A short summary of objectives and project scope
6-10
Starting the Project Plan:
The WBS
What is to be done?
When it is to be started and finished?
Who is going to do it?
6-11
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
WBS, sometime referred to as the project breakdown structure
(PBS), is a hierarchical family tree of project elements.
6-13
More on WBS
The work breakdown structure (WBS) is a tool used to capture the
decomposition of activities and the assignment of personnel. The WBS is not
one thing. It can take a wide variety of forms that, in turn, serve a wide variety
of purposes. The text suggests the following steps for WBS development:
1. Break the tasks down into sufficient detail so that they can be individually
planned, budgeted, scheduled, monitored, and controlled. The tasks at the
bottom of the structure are typically called work packages.
2. Identify the relevant supporting information needed for each work package
and the people who will work them.
3. The work packages must be reviewed with the people involved to ensure
their accuracy and adequacy in describing the tasks to be accomplished.
4. The WBS can be used to capture the direct costs estimated or budgeted for
each task.
5. The summary of the schedule information associated with each work
package can be summarized into a project master schedule.
Both the planned schedule and budget for each work package can be used as
the baseline to measure performance as the project is executed.
6-14
A Form to Assist Hierarchical Planning
Additional info. about each element of the project will be added to the
form later when budgeting and scheduling are discussed
6-15
Hierarchical Planning
6-16
A Visual WBS
Levels
6-19
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Constructing a Work: 100%
House Budget: $215,500
1. 1.1 Pour Work: 7.90% 2. 1.1 Rough-in Work: 2.80% 3. 1.1 Lay Work: 9.00%
Concrete Budget: $30,000 Electrical Masonry Budget: $35,000
Budget: $5,000
1. 1.2 Cure and Work: 10.30% 2. 1.2 Install and Work: 1.90% 3. 1.2 Install Roof Work: 3.10%
Strip Forms Budget: $7,000 Test Budget: $5,000 Drains Budget: $2,000
2. 1.3 Install HVAC Work: 7.10% 3. 1.3 Install Tile in Work: 1.30%
1. 2 Erect Work: 5.80% Toilet Rooms Budget: $10,000
Equipment Budget: $15,000
Steel Frame Budget: $9,000
6-22
Human Resources
6-23
The Responsibility (RACI) Matrix
6-24
Sample RACI Matrix
6-27
Integration Management
6-28
Interface Coordination Through
Integration Management
6-29
Managing Projects by Phases and
Phase-Gates
6-31
What Is A Risk?
32
Research Indicate the Need to
Improve Project Risk Management
Ibbs and Kwak1 in a study show risk has the lowest
maturity rating of all knowledge areas
1. Ibbs, C. William and Young Hoon Kwak. “Assessing Project Management Maturity,”
Project Management Journal, March 2000.
2. Kulik, Peter and Catherine Weber, “Software Risk Management Practices – 2001,”
KLCI Research Group, August 2001.
33
Project Management Maturity by Industry
Group and Knowledge Area1
1. Kulik, Peter and Catherine Weber, “Software Risk Management Practices – 2001,”
KLCI Research Group, August 2001.
35
Parts to Risk Management
Risk management planning
Risk identification
Qualitative risk analysis
Quantitative risk analysis:
– Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
– Decision Tree Analysis
– Monte Carlo Simulation
– Dealing with Project Disasters
Risk response planning
Risk monitoring and control
The risk management register
6-36
Risk Management Planning
6-37
Risk Identification
Risk is dependent on technology and environmental
factors
Delphi method is useful for identifying project risks
Other methods include brainstorming, nominal
group techniques, checklists, and attribute
listing
May also use cause-effect diagrams, flow charts,
influence charts, SWOT analysis
6-38
Qualitative Risk Analysis
6-39
Risk Matrix
6-41
A FMEA Example
Estimate the inability to detect (D) a failure associated with each cause:
Using a 10-point scale:
1 = detectability is almost certain using normal monitoring/control system
10 = it is practically certain that failure will not be detected in time to avoid or mitigate it
Figure 6-13 Decision tree based on expected monetary value (EMV) 6-43
Risk Response Planning
Threats Opportunities
– Avoid – Exploit
– Transfer – Share
– Mitigate – Enhance
– Accept – Accept
6-44
Risk Monitoring and Control
6-45
The Risk Management Register
Environments that may impact projects
Assumptions made
Risks identified
List of categories and key words
Estimates on risk, states of project’s environment, or on
project assumptions
Minutes
Actual outcomes
6-46
The Risk Management Register
If the risk management system has no memory, the
task of risk identification will be horrendous.
But system can have a memory – at least the
individuals in the system can remember.
Relying on the reallocations of individuals, however, is
“risky.”
To ensure against this particular risk, the risk
management system should maintain an up-to-date
data register.
6-47
The Risk Management Register
continued
This risk register includes, but not restricted to, the following:
Identification of all environments that may impact the project
Identification of all assumptions made in the preliminary project plan that
may be a source of risk for the project
A list of risks identified by the risk management group, complete with their
impacts and estimates of their probability of occurring
A complete list of all “categories” and “key words” used to categorize risks,
assumptions, and environments so that all risk management groups can
access past work done on risk environment
The details of all qualitative and quantitative estimates made on risks, on
states of the project’s environment, or on project assumptions, complete
with a brief description of the methods used to make such estimates
Minutes of all group meetings including all actions the group developed to
deal with or mitigate each specific risk, including the decision to ignore a
risk
The actual outcome of identified risks and, if a risk came to occur, the
results of actions taken to mitigate the risk or transfer the risk or invoke the
contingency plan
6-48