Noda 2013
Noda 2013
Related Articles
Vector acoustic intensity around a tuning fork
Am. J. Phys. 81, 99 (2013)
A low cost remote sensing system using PC and stereo equipment
Am. J. Phys. 79, 1240 (2011)
Demonstrating superposition of waves and Fourier analysis with tuning forks and MacScope II
Am. J. Phys. 79, 552 (2011)
Calibrating the frequency of tuning forks by means of Lissajous figures
Am. J. Phys. 79, 517 (2011)
Acoustic scattering from a spherical lens irradiated by a finite transducer: Focusing effect and refraction
Am. J. Phys. 79, 401 (2011)
Downloaded 13 Mar 2013 to 150.108.161.71. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission
A thermoacoustic oscillator powered by vaporized water and ethanol
Daisuke Noda and Yuki Uedaa)
Graduate school of Bio-Applications and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture
and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakacho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan
(Received 21 December 2011; accepted 26 October 2012)
We measure the temperature difference required to drive a thermoacoustic oscillator containing air,
water vapor, and liquid water as the working fluids. The oscillator is composed of a large tube
containing an array of narrow tubes connected at one end to a tank of liquid water. When the water
is heated, the temperature difference across the tube array increases until thermoacoustic
oscillations occur. The temperature difference at the onset of oscillation is measured to be 56 C,
significantly smaller (by 200 C) than the temperature measured when the tank is filled with dry
air instead of water. The temperature difference can be further reduced to 47 C by using ethanol
instead of water. VC 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4766940]
124 Am. J. Phys. 81 (2), February 2013 http://aapt.org/ajp C 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers
V 124
Downloaded 13 Mar 2013 to 150.108.161.71. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission
Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of the experimental setup.
125 Am. J. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 2, February 2013 D. Noda and Y. Ueda 125
Downloaded 13 Mar 2013 to 150.108.161.71. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission
As mentioned above, the frequency of oscillation at the From a thermodynamic point of view, thermoacoustic
onset was 181 Hz. However, this oscillation frequency varied oscillators can be regarded as heat engines1 because they
slightly with time, first increasing (up to 185 Hz) and then convert thermal energy (heat) into acoustic waves that can in
decreasing and finally stabilizing at 171 Hz. Such a frequency turn do useful work, such as moving a speaker cone to pro-
change can be attributed to a change in the speed of sound in duce electrical energy. Recently, thermoacoustic oscillators
the experimental setup, which depends on temperature and have been designed to produce energy from waste heat,16,17
molar fraction of vaporized water in the working gas. and hence reductions in DTo and DT have been pursued by
The total weight of the setup, including water, remained thermoacousticians.13,16 The present results indicate that
approximately the same before and after the experiment. How- using water or ethanol as one of the working fluids can
ever, we noticed that the stack was wet after the experiment, reduce these temperature differences while preserving the
whereas it was dry at the beginning of the experiment. These simplicity of the thermoacoustic energy converter.
facts indicate that air with a relative humidity of 100% became
the working fluid, and that condensation and evaporation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
occurred continuously in the stack and tank. In addition,
Raspet et al.15 give a theoretical argument that condensation The authors would like to express their cordial thanks to
and evaporation contribute to the enhancement of the thermoa- the anonymous referees for helpful comments that improved
coustic effect. Hence, the large reduction of DTo can likely be this manuscript.
attributed to the phase change of water. In the future, a quanti-
tative comparison between the experimentally obtained and a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
the theoretically calculated values of DTo may be presented. 1
J. Wheatley, T. Hofler, G. W. Swift, and A. Migliori, “Understanding
As a final experiment, we used 20 cm3 of diluted ethanol some simple phenomena in thermoacoustics with applications to acoustical
instead of water as the working fluid to see if this might fur- heat engines,” Am. J. Phys. 53, 147–162 (1985).
2
ther reduce DTo ; the diluted ethanol had a density of A. Jeromen, “A simplified thermoacoustic engine demonstration,” Am. J.
0:83 g=cm3 before the start of the experiment. The experi- Phys. 71, 496–499 (2003).
3
G. W. Swift, “Thermoacoustic engines,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 1145–
ment was repeated while again holding E_ el ¼ 40 W and the 1180 (1988).
results are shown in Fig. 4(b). Once again we see that ini- 4
J. Wheatley, T. Hofler, G. W. Swift, and A. Migliori, “An intrinsically irre-
tially TH increases steadily while TC remains relatively con- versible thermoacoustic heat engine,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 153–170
stant at around 25 C. When t ¼ 410 s (dotted line on graph), (1983).
5
thermoacoustic oscillation is detected at a frequency of 159 G. W. Swift, Thermoacoustics: A Unifying Perspective for Some Engines
Hz. The onset occurs for DTo ¼ 47 C, almost 10 C smaller 6
and Refrigerators (Acoustical Society of America, Pennsylvania) (2002).
S. L. Garrett, “Resource Letter TA-1: Thermoacoustic engines and refrig-
than the experiment with water as the working fluid. After
erators,” Am. J. Phys. 72, 11–17 (2004).
the onset of oscillation, TH stabilizes at around 72 C while 7
Unspecified Buddhist monks, Tamoinnikki (Nara) (1478–1618, re-edited
TC begins increasing until about t ¼ 650 s, when both temper- in 1935).
atures level off and increase much more slowly. At 8
A. Ueda, Ugetsu Monogatari (Kyoto, 1776)
9
t ¼ 1 500 s, the temperatures remain almost constant and the J. W. S. Rayleigh, Theory of Sound, 2nd ed. (Dover Publications, 1945),
amplitude of the oscillation also takes on a constant value. Vol. II, pp. 230–231.
10
At t ¼ 1800 s we have TH ¼ 77 C and TC ¼ 56 C, giving a N. Rott and G. Zouzoulas, “Thermally driven acoustic-oscillations, part 4:
Tubes with variable cross-section,” Z. Angew Math. Phys. 27, 197–224
smallest temperature difference of DT ¼ 21 C. (1976).
11
N. Sugimoto and R. Takeuchi, “Marginal conditions for thermoacoustic
IV. SUMMARY oscillations in resonators,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 465, 3531–3552
(2009).
We estimate and measure the temperature difference DTo 12
A. Atchley, H. Bass, T. Hofler, and H. Lin, “Study of a thermoacoustic
for the onset of thermoacoustic oscillation under three differ- prime mover below onset of self]oscillation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91,
ent conditions. Under the first condition, dry air is used as 734–743 (1992).
13
T. Biwa, D. Hasegawa, and T. Yazaki, “Low temperature differential ther-
the working fluid; under the second condition, air and water
moacoustic Stirling engine,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 034102–1–3 (2010).
are used; and under the third condition, air and diluted etha- 14
G. Vandegrift, “Experimental study of the Helmholtz resonance of a vio-
nol are used. The experimental results show that the values lin,” Am. J. Phys. 61, 415–421 (1993).
of DTo for these experiments are 290 C, 56 C, and 47 C, 15
R. Raspet, W. V. Slaton, C. J. Hickey, and R. A. Hiller, “Theory of inert
respectively. Furthermore, the smallest measured tempera- gas-condensing vapor thermoacoustics: Propagation equation,” J. Acoust.
ture difference while maintaining thermoacoustic oscillations Soc. Am. 112, 1414–1422 (2002).
16
(DT ) was 42 C and 21 C under the second and third condi- K. de Blok, “Novel 4-stage traveling wave thermoacoustic power gener-
ator,” in Proceedings of FEDSM2010, 73–79 (ASME, Montreal, Canada,
tions, respectively. Hence, we can conclude that the intro- 2010).
duction of water or ethanol into a thermoacoustic oscillator 17
K. Nakamura and Y. Ueda, “Design and construction of a standing-wave
has a large effect on the reduction of the temperature differ- thermoacoustic engine with heat sources having a given temperature
ence required to drive the oscillator. ratio,” J. Therm. Sci. Technol. 6, 416–423 (2011).
126 Am. J. Phys., Vol. 81, No. 2, February 2013 D. Noda and Y. Ueda 126
Downloaded 13 Mar 2013 to 150.108.161.71. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission