KPI of Process Safety 2022
KPI of Process Safety 2022
2022p 2023
DATA SERIES
Feedback
IOGP welcomes feedback on our reports: [email protected]
Disclaimer
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither IOGP nor any of its
Members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable
or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis
that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent
recipient of such terms.
Please note that this publication is provided for informational purposes and adoption of any of its recommendations is at the discretion
of the user. Except as explicitly stated otherwise, this publication must not be considered as a substitute for government policies or
decisions or reference to the relevant legislation relating to information contained in it.
Where the publication contains a statement that it is to be used as an industry standard, IOGP and its Members past, present, and
future expressly disclaim all liability in respect of all claims, losses or damages arising from the use or application of the information
contained in this publication in any industrial application.
Any reference to third party names is for appropriate acknowledgment of their ownership and does not constitute a sponsorship or
endorsement.Any reference to third party names is for appropriate acknowledgment of their ownership and does not constitute a
sponsorship or endorsement.
Copyright notice
The contents of these pages are © International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in
whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of IOGP and (ii) the sources are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other
use requires the prior written permission of IOGP.
These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising
here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
REPORT July
2022p 2023
DATA SERIES
Revision history
VERSION DATE AMENDMENTS
2.00 July 2023 First release
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Contents
/3
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Contributing companies
The process safety statistics were derived from data provided by the following companies:
/4
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Introduction
In response to a number of major incidents, the oil and gas industry has identified opportunities to improve Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs) for monitoring and review within management systems in order to more
proactively identify and address barrier weaknesses.
IOGP Report 456 - Process Safety - Recommended Practice on Key Performance Indicators provides guidance
for companies with upstream activities on Key Performance Indicators (KPI) used in managing process safety for
the prevention of unplanned and uncontrolled loss of containment events. It builds on the framework and
definitions included in the API Recommended Practice (RP) 754 (revised in April 2016), Process Safety Indicators
for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries on process safety indicators, with specific emphasis on their
application to upstream oil and gas activities.
While a third edition of 456 was released in May 2023, the 2022 data was reported using the second edition
(released November 2018).
IOGP Report 456 and API RP 754 adopt a four-tier framework of KPIs which is illustrated in Figure 1.
Tiers 1 and 2 are predominantly lagging indicators related to Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) referred to as
a Process Safety Event (PSE):
The Tier 1 KPI records events with greater consequence within the four-tier approach.
The Tier 2 KPI records incidents with a lesser consequence.
Figure 1: Process Safety Indicator Pyramid (from API RP 754 2nd edition, April 2016)
RP 754 Tier 1 and Tier 2 KPI definitions and thresholds have been adopted by IOGP with the intent that both
/5
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
indicators can be applied across production and drilling operations for the industry worldwide.
Tier 1 and Tier 2 KPIs include LOPC incidents that are reportable as Process Safety Events (PSEs) if the incident
results in any of the consequences shown in Figure 3. The definitions refer to material release threshold
quantities, which are published in Part E of IOGP Report 456.
Figure 2: Process Safety Event definitions and thresholds (from IOGP Report 456, extract from API RP 754
2nd edition, 2016)
Note: “days away from work” injury should be taken to be the same as the IOGP defined Lost Work Day Case (LWDC).
In this Report, 2022 data are published together with 2013-2021 data.
The Process Safety Event (PSE) data presented in this Report are based on the numbers of Tier 1 and Tier 2 PSE
reported by participating IOGP Member Companies, broken down for:
The Tier 1 and Tier 2 data presented have been normalized against reported work hours associated with drilling
and production activities to provide PSE rates.
Tier 3 and Tier 4 process safety KPIs are not included in this report as they are primarily intended for use at a
company or facility level. Guidance on Tier 3 and Tier 4 indicators is available in IOGP Report 456, Part G.
Countries and companies that are subject to international sanctions are not featured in this Report for 2022 data.
/6
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Definitions
For drilling operations, any unplanned or uncontrolled release to the surface (seabed or
ground level) should be included. LOPC is a type of event. An unplanned or uncontrolled
release is an LOPC irrespective of whether the material is released into the environment,
or into secondary containment, or into other primary containment not intended to
contain the material released under normal operating conditions).
Primary containment
A tank, vessel, pipe, truck, rail car, or other equipment designed to keep a material
within it, typically for purposes of storage, separation, processing or transfer of gases or
liquids. The terms vessel and pipe are taken to include containment of reservoir fluids
within the casing and wellhead valving to the surface. Note that primary containment for
a specified material may comprise a vessel or pipe that is inside another vessel that is
also designed as primary containment for a different material; for example, a heating
tube is primary containment for fuel gas or fuel oil, even though the tubes may be inside
a firebox which is in turn within an oil-water separator.
/7
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Data collection
Participating IOGP Member Companies were asked to report the number of offshore and onshore Tier 1 and Tier
2 PSE for both drilling and production, consequences relating to Tier 1 and Tier 2 PSE and additional information
about the material released and the operational activities at the time of the release. Note that a single PSE can
result in multiple consequences, so the total number of consequences reported will equal or exceed the total
number of PSEs.
Information was also requested on fatalities that resulted from PSE, i.e., the number of PSE that resulted in one
or more fatalities, as well as the actual number of fatalities (employees and contractors, or third parties).
The narrative descriptions of fatal incidents and high potential events are submitted separately to the process
safety event data published in this report, and Tier 1 PSE narratives were not provided for all reported Tier 1 PSE.
Therefore there can be no direct correlation between the narratives and the data published in this report.
Descriptions and lessons learned for Tier 1 PSE are available at https://data.iogp.org/ProcessSafety/Tier1PSE/.
Fatal incidents that are also Tier 1 PSE are available at https://data.iogp.org/ProcessSafety/FatalIncidents/. High
potential events that are PSE or PSE related are available at
https://data.iogp.org/ProcessSafety/HighPotentialEvents/.
Descriptions and lessons learned for all reported events that had fatal consequences for company or contractor
employees are available at https://data.iogp.org/Safety/FatalIncidents/. High potential events are available at
https://data.iogp.org/Safety/HighPotentialEvents/.
Normalization
Tier 1 and Tier 2 PSE have been normalized against work hours associated with process safety events using the
following formula for the PSE Rate. Refer to IOGP Report 456, Part C, for further information.
Data are only included for normalized results where both work hours and process safety event data are reported
for the data set and work function.
/8
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The safety data submission process is used for the collection of data relating to safety performance, process
safety performance and motor vehicle crashes. The IOGP safety database has built-in data validation
requirements and each company data submission is validated by the IOGP Secretariat and the work group (Safety
Committee, Subcommittee, or Expert Group) responsible for the data set in accordance with the IOGP data
collection and reporting procedure. Any communication with reporting companies is conducted by the IOGP
Secretariat and any data validated by an IOGP workgroup is blind coded to preserve the anonymity of the
reporting companies.
A self-assessment questionnaire is included within the data submission process to determine the alignment
between the requested data and the company submissions. The information provided in this questionnaire is also
used in the validation process. Data that appear to be incorrect and that cannot be confirmed by the submitting
company as correct may be excluded from the data set at the discretion of the Secretariat.
Countries and companies that are subject to international sanctions are not featured in this Report for 2022 data.
The scope of data included within this report is detailed in Appendix A.
Data series
Other IOGP data reports published annually include:
/9
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
1. 2022 results
47 companies contributed PSE data in 2022 (vs. 47 in 2021, 44 in 2020) (see Table 2 and Appendix A). This is in
comparison with 51 companies contributing to the safety performance indicators database in 2022 (50 in 2021, 48
in 2020).
Figure 3:
Total number of PSE – Tier 1 and Tier 2
1,000
912
892
795 795
800
715
617 622
607
Number of PSE
600 563
536
400
291
276
254 256 261
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 10
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 4:
Number of related production + drilling work hours
1,724
1,712
1,800
1,639
1,631
1,604
1,604
1,588
1,522
1,509
1,509
1,495
1,600
1,450
1,443
1,440
1,406
1,406
1,326
1,311
1,400
1,096
1,200
1,015
Million hours
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 hours Tier 2 hours
The data presented in Figure 5 have been normalized using the company-reported work hours associated with
drilling and production operations.
Where companies have not provided work hours for the drilling and production functions specifically, their
reported PSEs and overall work hours have been excluded from the normalized analysis shown in Figure 5. See
Tables B.1 (Tier 1 data) and B.2 (Tier 2 data).
Figure 5:
PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2
0.70
0.61
0.60
0.50
PSE per million work hours
0.50
0.44 0.44
0.42
0.39 0.39
0.40 0.38
0.37
0.35
0.30
0.19
0.20 0.16 0.16
0.14 0.14 0.14
0.13
0.12 0.12 0.12
0.10
0.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 11
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Number of PSE Number of PSE for normalized results* PSE rate (PSE per million work hours)*
In 2022, reported PSE represented approximately 95% of the drilling and production work hours in the 2022 IOGP
safety database, i.e., out of 1,593 million hours (97% in 2021, 99% in 2020, see Table A.1).
/ 12
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
2013 113 47
2014 91 49
2015 52 20
2016 18 4
2017 13 0
2018 14 5
2019 20 3
2020 4 4
2021 14 22
2022 4 3
4 Tier 1 PSE related to sabotage or wilful damage were reported in 2022. All 4 occurred onshore. All 4 were
associated with production operations and resulted in material release.
None of the sabotage/wilful damage PSE reported to date have involved fatalities.
/ 13
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 6:
Total number of PSE – Tier 1 and Tier 2, onshore and offshore
800 710
666
664
700
630
600
529
485
500
Number of PSE
446
440
434
416
400
275
300
247
246
240
226
224
220
183
182
172
165
161
200
158
155
148
143
131
120
93
78
100
49
44
37
37
36
34
34
30
26
21
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
Note: Incudes all reported PSE. PSE where associated work hours were not reported have been excluded from the normalized results shown in Figure 8.
Figure 7:
Number of related production + drilling work hours
1,400
1,165
1,152
1,200
1,076
1,076
1,061
1,057
1,037
1,009
992
967
963
960
1,000
926
926
925
925
880
864
Million hours
800
716
699
622
584
584
579
563
560
559
531
528
528
600
482
480
480
480
458
448
446
446
381
400
316
200
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
Note: Excludes work hours where Tier 1 or Tier 2 PSE are not reported. Not all companies report Tier 1 or Tier 2 PSE for all countries onshore/offshore.
/ 14
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 8:
PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2, onshore and offshore
0.8
0.67
0.7
0.63
0.6
PSE per million work hours
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.50
0.48
0.47
0.5
0.40
0.40
0.39
0.38
0.37
0.4
0.34
0.30
0.28
0.3
0.24
0.24
0.23
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.16
0.16
0.2
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.10
0.09
0.09
0.07
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.1
0.05
0.04
0.0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
/ 15
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
To standardize the response, an IOGP list of causal factors and a glossary was provided to the Member
Companies as part of the IOGP User Guide. The causal factors list is divided into two sections:
People (Acts) classifications usually involve either the actions of a person or actions which were required but
not carried out or were incorrectly performed. There are four major categories of actions, with an additional
level of detail under each of the major categories.
Process (Conditions) classifications usually involve some type of physical hazard or organizational aspect out
of the control of the individual. There are five major classification categories, with an additional level of detail
under each of the major categories.
Tier 1 PSE that were the result of sabotage or wilful damager are included in the causal factors analysis.
In 2022:
180 of the 182 Tier 1 PSE descriptions reported were assigned causal factors.
365 causal factors were assigned for the 180 Tier 1 PSE.
Between 1 and 8 causal factors were assigned per incident.
Table 4: Causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE (2014 - 2022) (includes sabotabe/wilful damage)
Causal factor group 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
The causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 10 causal
factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE in 2022 compared with the previous 8 years. 5 of the causal factors were in the top
ten for each of the 9 years shown.
/ 16
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing 30 50 49 60 65 58 68 47 54
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate design/specification/management of 22 55 42 42 42 63 27 34 50
change
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate/defective 31 32 30 39 48 44 24 63 37
tools/equipment/materials/products
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate work standards/procedures 18 37 44 30 32 40 22 25 28
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Deviation unintentional (by individual or group) 8 29 13 23 8 33 11 15 26
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment 11 41 40 47 33 46 22 28 24
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices 10 27 20 10 9 17 18 14 20
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers 9 23 26 13 20 14 16 8 16
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress 14 16 7 7 10 7 6 5 13
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Storms or acts of nature 1 9 14 3 9 11 3 17 11
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate communication 13 15 17 9 11 15 10 10 11
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate training/competence 15 16 20 21 15 23 13 15 10
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate supervision 6 10 15 17 11 20 10 12 10
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Improper decision making or lack of judgment 16 30 23 13 16 12 8 11 10
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Improper use/position of 10 9 6 9 5 5 4 4 6
tools/equipment/materials/products
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Improper position (in the line of fire) 1 5 5 2 5 1 4 4 6
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy 2 3 2 2 4 6 2 1 6
isolation
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Failure to warn of hazard 3 7 12 3 3 9 7 3 5
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Failure to report/learn from events 1 13 9 4 10 4 3 4 4
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Deviation intentional (by individual or group) 7 4 6 1 3 3 0 3 4
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Equipment or materials not secured 2 1 10 2 3 5 1 2 4
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) 3 4 3 3 4 4 9 4 3
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate security provisions or systems 0 2 3 0 1 2 1 0 2
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Inadequate use of safety systems 4 5 10 3 3 7 2 5 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly 4 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Improper lifting or loading 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Fatigue 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment 0 4 4 2 1 4 0 5 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices 1 4 7 3 4 2 3 2 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Poor leadership/organizational culture 3 8 4 9 6 2 2 1 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Congestion, clutter or restricted motion 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Work or motion at improper speed 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Acts of violence 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Use of drugs or alcohol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Causal factors are listed in order of frequency for 2022. The top 10 causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE for each year are highlighted.
2022: 2 causal factors were equal 10th with 11 assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted)
/ 17
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
All of the 4 fatal incidents involving workforce fatalities that have been identified as ‘also Tier 1 PSE’ were
assigned causal factors.
16 causal factors were assigned for the 4 fatal incidents.
Between 2 and 6 causal factors were assigned per incident.
Causal factor group 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
PEOPLE (ACTS) 18 6 8 12 2 5 1 1 0 8
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) 19 6 21 6 5 7 1 1 0 8
A full analysis of the causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 2022 compared with the previous 10 years is
shown in Appendix B.
/ 18
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
9 of the 10 high potential events that have been identified as ‘also PSE’ were assigned causal factors.
29 causal factors were assigned for the 9 high potential events.
Between 1 and 8 causal factors were assigned per event.
Causal factor group 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
PEOPLE (ACTS) 11 9 4 21 3 9 15 9 7 9
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) 54 41 12 45 25 33 33 33 24 20
The causal factors assigned to high potential events in 2022 compared with the previous 10 years are shown in
Appendix B.
Additional information on the high potential events reported by region can be found on the IOGP Data website at
https://data.iogp.org/Safety/HighPotentialEvents/ . The information provided includes a narrative description of
the event, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting
company.
/ 19
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
1.7 Barriers
The allocation of ‘barriers’ to Tier 1 process safety events was requested for the first time as part of the 2014
data submission.
In 2022:
178 of the 182 Tier 1 PSE descriptions reported were assigned barriers.
398 barriers were assigned for the 178 Tier 1 PSE.
Between 1 and 6 barriers were assigned per incident.
Barriers assigned to Tier 1 PSE 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
TIER 1 PSE: Hardware Barrier Failures 53 142 179 135 156 170 125 143 163
TIER 1 PSE: Human Barrier Failures 42 84 88 74 75 85 57 71 95
TIER 1 PSE: Management System Element Barrier Failure 120 185 186 213 180 188 136 142 140
The barriers assigned to Tier 1 PSE are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 10 barriers
assigned to Tier 1 PSE in 2022 compared with the previous 8 years. 8 of the barriers were in the top ten for each
of the 5 years shown.
/ 20
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Causal factor 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Hardware Barrier Failures: Process Containment 20 47 76 74 86 102 56 72 82
Hardware Barrier Failures: Structural Integrity 14 37 37 34 38 35 31 28 52
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Asset design and integrity 31 60 56 61 64 49 23 44 50
Human Barrier Failures: Operating in accordance with procedures - PTW, Isolation of equipment, Overrides and inhibits of 22 48 32 37 37 39 17 35 43
safety systems, Shift handover, etc.
Human Barrier Failures: Surveillance, operator rounds and routine inspection 6 17 31 20 26 22 26 25 28
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Risk assessment and control 27 36 39 42 17 39 32 29 27
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Plans and procedures 15 31 34 39 35 24 22 24 25
Hardware Barrier Failures: Detection Systems 5 16 27 12 12 11 15 7 13
Human Barrier Failures: Acceptance of handover or restart of facilities or equipment 6 7 7 10 5 8 4 4 11
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Execution of activities 23 24 19 29 13 22 19 16 10
Hardware Barrier Failures: Shutdown Systems – including operational well isolation and drilling well control equipment 3 15 10 9 6 9 7 14 9
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Organization, resources and capability 7 7 11 7 9 13 11 7 8
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Policies, standards and objectives 3 18 6 10 21 22 8 7 8
Human Barrier Failures: Response to process alarm and upset conditions (e.g. outside safe envelope) 4 6 11 7 5 8 6 6 8
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Monitoring, reporting and learning 5 5 12 11 16 12 20 12 6
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Commitment and accountability 6 4 4 8 2 0 0 2 6
Human Barrier Failures: Response to emergencies 4 6 6 0 1 7 3 0 5
Hardware Barrier Failures: Ignition Control 2 4 13 0 4 3 6 11 4
Hardware Barrier Failures: Protection Systems - including deluge and fire water systems 5 21 6 4 4 5 7 9 2
Hardware Barrier Failures: Emergency Response Equipment and Systems 2 1 7 2 5 5 3 1 1
Human Barrier Failures: Authorization of temporary and mobile equipment 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Stakeholders and customers 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0
Hardware Barrier Failures: Life-Saving Equipment - including evacuation systems 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 0
Management System Element Barrier Failure: Assurance, review and improvement 2 0 4 4 3 6 1 0 0
Unspecified: Unspecified null null null null null null null null 0
Barriers are listed in order of frequency for 2022. The top 10 barriers assigned to Tier 1 PSE for each year are highlighted.
/ 21
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
2. Results by function
Tier 1 and Tier 2 data presented represent both onshore and offshore combined.
2.1 Drilling
Figure 9:
Total number of PSE – Tier 1 and Tier 2, drilling
140
130
120 113
100
Number of PSE - drilling
80
60
51
47
42
38 37
40 34
32
20 21
19
20 16
12 13
10 10 11
7 6
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
Note: Incudes all reported PSE. PSE where associated work hours were not reported have been excluded from the normalized results shown in Figure 11.
Figure 10:
Number of related drilling work hours
476
500
472
465
418
410
400
387
378
400
341
339
326
326
318
309
307
307
Million hours - drilling
304
295
295
281
300
200
100
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 hours Tier 2 hours
/ 22
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 11:
PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2, drilling
0.35
0.30
0.30
PSE per million work hours - drilling
0.25 0.23
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.12
0.11 0.11 0.11
0.10 0.09
0.07
0.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
Figure 12:
Total number of PSE – Tier 1 and Tier 2, drilling – onshore and offshore
80
69 68
70
61
60
Number of PSE - drilling
50
45
40
31 30 31
30
23 24
22
19 20
18
20 16 16
15 14
11 11 12
9 10 9 9 9 9
8 8
10 7 6 6 6 5
3 3 2 2
1 1 0
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
Note: Incudes all reported PSE. PSE where associated work hours were not reported have been excluded from the normalized results shown in Figure 14.
/ 23
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 13:
Number of related drilling work hours
350
301
300
276
267
258
250
240
240
250
229
Million hours - drilling
214
212
206
197
195
195
193
189
200
179
179
177
174
172
161
160
160
153
153
149
148
142
142
150
131
131
128
128
127
127
127
121
116
109
100
50
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
Figure 14:
PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2, drilling – onshore and offshore
0.45
0.42
0.40
PSE per million work hours - drilling
0.35
0.30
0.24
0.24
0.25
0.22
0.21
0.20
0.16
0.16
0.13
0.13
0.15
0.12
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.10
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
/ 24
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
2.2 Production
Figure 15:
Total number of PSE – Tier 1 and Tier 2, production
900
782 779
800 748 753
681
700
Number of PSE - production
585
600 566 569
542
504
500
400
300 271
257 251
242 243
100
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
Note: Incudes all reported PSE. PSE where associated work hours were not reported have been excluded from the normalized results shown in Figure 17.
Figure 16:
Number of related production work hours
1,600
1,337
1,334
1,400
1,278
1,278
1,214
1,214
1,177
1,174
1,159
1,131
1,112
1,108
1,105
1,104
1,099
1,099
1,200
Million hours - production
1,000
916
911
792
734
800
600
400
200
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 hours Tier 2 hours
/ 25
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 17:
PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2, production
0.80
0.75
0.70
PSE per million work hours - production
0.60 0.59
0.60 0.56
0.51
0.40
0.30
0.25
0.21
0.18 0.19 0.19 0.18
0.20
0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14
0.10
0.00
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
Figure 18:
Total number of PSE – Tier 1 and Tier 2, production – onshore and offshore
700
642
634
607
605
600
498
Number of PSE - production
469
500
425
424
414
398
400
300
256
238
230
215
215
211
177
166
200
152
152
148
145
141
139
137
135
119
106
87
100
73
41
36
34
33
32
31
28
27
25
21
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
Note: Incudes all reported PSE. PSE where associated work hours were not reported have been excluded from the normalised results shown in Figure 20.
/ 26
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 19:
Number of related production work hours
1,000
926
923
880
880
840
799
785
772
772
756
754
752
800
747
747
742
701
Million hours - production
630
624
600
539
527
442
442
417
411
411
403
397
397
390
356
355
353
352
352
400
338
331
286
286
253
208
200
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
Figure 20:
PSE Rate – Tier 1 and Tier 2, production – onshore and offshore
0.9
0.84
0.76
0.8
PSE per million work hours - production
0.69
0.7
0.62
0.61
0.60
0.56
0.6
0.54
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.5
0.43
0.42
0.39
0.4
0.33
0.32
0.30
0.28
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.24
0.23
0.22
0.22
0.19
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.17
0.2
0.13
0.11
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.1
0.0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Onshore Tier 2 Onshore Tier 1 Offshore Tier 2 Offshore
/ 27
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
3. Results by activity
The Tier 1 and Tier 2 data presented in this section represent production operations both onshore and offshore
and are broken down by activity, i.e., whether the event occurred during normal operations, start-up or shutdown.
Drilling results are not split by activity, since this would not be meaningful.
‘Other’ is the category used when the event could not be classified under any of the other headings (start-up,
normal operations or shutdown).
‘Unspecified’ is used for PSE where the activity has not been provided.
/ 28
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
3.1 Tier 1
In 2022, 22 of the companies that reported one or more Tier 1 PSE provided information on the material released.
Figure 21:
Production PSE by activity (2022) - Tier 1
Other: 9.4 %
3.2 Tier 2
In 2022, 32 of the companies that reported one or more Tier 2 PSE provided information on the material released.
Figure 22:
Production PSE by activity (2022) - Tier 2
Other: 4.6 %
/ 29
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
4. Results by consequence
The Tier 1 and Tier 2 data presented represent both onshore and offshore, and production and drilling, combined.
More than one consequence can be associated with each reported process safety event. The consequence
classifications, extract from Report 456 - Process Safety – Recommended Practice on Key Performance
Indicators, 2nd edition, are listed in Table 10. Refer to Report 456 Part E for further information and threshold
tables. Report 456 Part H (Part F in the 3rd edition) contains examples that can be used as an aid to the
interpretation of the guidance.
The analysis in this section shows the consequences assigned to Tier 1 and Tier 2 process safety events. A single
PSE can result in multiple consequences, so the total number of consequences reported will equal or exceed the
total number of PSEs.
/ 30
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table 10: Consequence classifications (Reference IOGP Report 456 published 2018, Part E)
/ 31
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 32
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
4.1 Tier 1
Information was provided on the consequences of individual events for 100% of Tier 1 PSE reported in 2022.
Figure 23:
Consequences assigned to Tier 1 PSE (2022)
4.2 Tier 2
Information was provided on the consequences of individual events for 100% of Tier 2 PSE reported in 2022.
Figure 24:
Consequences assigned to Tier 2 PSE (2022)
/ 33
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 25:
Tier 1 PSE with injury as consequence as a percentage of total reported Tier 1 PSE
10
9
Percentage of total reported Tier 1 PSE
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
PSE resulting in Employee or Contractor fatality or LWDC
PSE resulting in 3rd Party hospitalization or fatality
PSE resulting in fatality
Figure 26:
Number of fatalities
18 17
16
14
12
Number of fatalities
10
8 7
6
6 5 5
4 4
4 3
2 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Employee/Contractor fatalities 3rd Party fatalities
Figure 27 shows the number of fatalities in each fatal Tier 1 PSE reported. Each column represents one fatal
PSE.
/ 34
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 27:
Definitions
Tier 1 injury:
Injury to employee or contractor: fatality and/or Lost Workday Case (‘days away from
work’ or ‘lost time injury’)
Injury to third party: fatality, or injury/illness that results in a hospital admission
/ 35
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
12
Percentage of total reported Tier 1 PSE
10
8
- fire or explosion*
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
Definitions
Tier 1 fire:
A fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $100,000 of direct cost to the
Company.
Tier 2 fire:
Tier 2 fire: A fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $2,500 of direct cost to
the Company.
Note: The Tier 1 threshold for direct cost changed with 2017 data reporting; for 2011 –
2016 data the threshold was $25,000 of direct cost to the Company. The threshold for
Tier 2 was unchanged.
See Report 456 2nd edition, Part C.
/ 36
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
‘Unspecified’ is used for PSE where the type of material released has not been provided.
5.1 Tier 1
In 2022, 22 of the companies that reported one or more Tier 1 PSE provided information on the material released.
Information on the material released was provided for 99% of Tier 1 PSE reported in 2022.
Figure 29:
PSE by material released as a percentage of total reported PSE - Tier 1
100 3.3
7.3
12.0 12.5 11.4
14.6 8.8
18.8 20.8
22.0
10.9
5.2 3.5
3.9 10.9
Percentage of total reported Tier 1 PSE
35.6
80 6.9 4.2
5.5
44.0
34.1
40
36.5
35.8
20 31.9 32.8 33.2 34.6
24.7 27.5
25.7
21.1
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Toxics Flammable gas Hazardous liquids Other gases Unspecified or not relevant
/ 37
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
5.2 Tier 2
In 2022, 32 of the companies that reported one or more Tier 2 PSE provided information on the material released.
Information on the material released was provided for 99% of Tier 2 PSE reported in 2022.
Figure 30:
PSE by material released as a percentage of total reported PSE - Tier 2
100 1.1
7.1 8.8 7.1 7.3
12.1
17.3 16.2
20.8
12.7 10.1
6.8 17.4
Percentage of total reported Tier 2 PSE
35.9 33.8
80 8.5 12.3
7.7
7.0
60.9
60 6.7
46.8
49.8
41.3 53.0
47.1
- by material released
39.9
45.8
32.2
40 37.2
20 33.2
31.5 29.8 28.4 27.9
22.3 25.7 27.0
23.6
21.3
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Toxics Flammable gas Hazardous liquids Other gases Unspecified or not relevant
/ 38
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Designed to support those working in front-line operations, maintenance, and on wells teams, the IOGP Process
Safety Fundamentals are informed by data and designed to draw attention to situations that are most likely to
lead to process safety event fatalities. They are therefore not intended to exhaustively address all process safety
risks and hazards in the oil and gas industry, but to be deployed in addition to a company’s underlying systems
for process safety management.
For more information see IOGP Report 638, Process Safety Fundamentals.
6.1 Tier 1
Allocation of PSF to Tier 1 process safety events was introduced as part of the 2021 data request. During the
IOGP validation process a number of these were reassigned for consistency. The reported PSF represents the
primary PSF associated with the PSE since more than one may have applied.
In 2022, 65% of the reported Tier 1 PSE were assigned a Process Safety Fundamental.
Note that PSE associated with mechanical integrity are not typically assigned a Process Safety Fundamental.
Figure 31:
PSE by Process Safety Fundamental (2022) - Tier 1
/ 39
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
7. Results by region
All data submissions are reported by country and are summarized by region. The Tier 1 and Tier 2 data presented
represent both onshore and offshore, and production and overall, combined. Countries and companies that are
subject to international sanctions are not featured in this Report for 2022 data.
Figure 33:
Total number of Tier 1 PSE – by region
180
173
162
160
152
140
Number of Tier 1 PSE
120
101
97
100
92
84
83
76
80
75
72
58
56
60
45
43
40
40
34
32
32
30
29
28
26
26
26
25
24
24
24
23
22
21
21
21
21
20
20
20
19
19
19
18
17
20
15
15
15
15
14
13
13
12
12
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
6
3
2
1
0
Africa Asia/ Europe Middle North Russia South
Australasia East America & &
Central Central
Asia America
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Note: Incudes all reported PSE. PSE where associated work hours were not reported have been excluded from the normalized results shown in Figure 34.
/ 40
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 34:
Number of Tier 2 PSE – by region
500
480
450
389
400
366
350
Number of Tier 2 PSE
326
305
286
300
256
242
241
232
250
207
200
163
141
150
131
122
116
108
101
98
95
94
94
92
100
88
87
83
81
81
79
76
74
74
73
70
70
69
68
64
63
59
58
57
56
56
56
52
51
50
49
49
48
46
42
41
41
41
50
38
37
34
34
34
25
22
21
20
12
12
11
11
6
0
Africa Asia/ Europe Middle North Russia South
Australasia East America & &
Central Central
Asia America
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Note: Incudes all reported PSE. PSE where associated work hours were not reported have been excluded from the normalized results shown in Figure 36.
The normalized data presented only include PSE where drilling or production work hours were reported for the
data set in the main safety database, hence some PSE have been excluded. See Tables B.21 – B.30 (Number of
PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function).
Figure 35:
Tier 1 PSE Rate – PSE per million work hours
0.7
0.59
0.6
0.54
Tier 1 PSE per million work hours
0.52
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.5
0.42
0.39
0.38
0.4
0.36
0.29
0.29
0.3
0.25
0.22
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.18
0.2
0.16
0.16
0.15
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.10
0.10
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.1
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.0
Africa Asia/ Europe Middle North Russia South ALL
Australasia East America & & REGIONS
Central Central
Asia America
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
/ 41
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 36:
Tier 2 PSE Rate – PSE per million work hours
1.6
1.48
1.36
1.4
1.29
1.24
1.24
Tier 2 PSE per million work hours
1.16
1.16
1.16
1.2
1.00
0.94
1.0
0.88
0.84
0.78
0.75
0.8
0.67
0.61
0.60
0.59
0.54
0.53
0.6
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.49
0.49
0.47
0.46
0.45
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.38
0.38
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.35
0.34
0.4
0.32
0.31
0.29
0.28
0.28
0.27
0.27
0.26
0.26
0.25
0.23
0.23
0.22
0.22
0.21
0.21
0.20
0.19
0.18
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.13
0.2
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.0
Africa Asia/ Europe Middle North Russia South ALL
Australasia East America & & REGIONS
Central Central
Asia America
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Figure 37:
Related work hours for Tier 1 PSE analyses 2022 - by region, overall
Asia / Australasia: 19 %
North America: 15 %
Europe: 11 %
Middle East: 18 %
/ 42
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 38:
Related work hours for Tier 1 PSE analyses 2022 - by region, onshore
Asia / Australasia: 13 %
North America: 21 %
Europe: 9 %
Middle East: 18 %
Figure 39:
Related work hours for Tier 1 PSE analyses 2022 - by region, offshore
Africa: 10 %
South & Central America: 17 %
North America: 5 %
Middle East: 18 %
Europe: 15 %
/ 43
Tier 2 PSE per million work hours Tier 1 PSE per million work hours
- drilling overall - drilling overall
Figure 41:
Figure 40:
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.29
7.1 Drilling
0.13 0.06
0.10 0.03
0.03 0.02
0.02 0.00
0.05 0.04
0.10 0.07
Africa
0.02
Africa
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.04
0.10 0.04
2013
2013
0.03 0.04
0.04 0.00
0.05 0.00
0.12 0.00
0.00
Asia/
0.00
Asia/
0.02 0.00
0.00
2014
2014
Australasia
0.03
0.00
Australasia
0.02
0.00
0.34
0.35 0.02
0.21 0.02
0.24 0.00
2015
2015
0.39 0.09
0.21 0.09
0.13 0.06
0.00
Europe
0.10
Europe
0.00
0.08
0.04
0.09
0.06
2016
2016
0.06
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.01
0.02
0.01
2017
2017
0.00
East
0.01
East
Middle
0.00
Middle
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
0.70
/ 44
0.09
2018
2018
0.40 0.07
0.09 0.05
0.30 0.02
0.24 0.07
0.16 0.04
North
0.28
North
0.09
America
0.12
2019
2019
America
0.05
0.18 0.03
0.05 0.03
0.15 0.00
0.06 0.03
0.03 0.06
2020
2020
0.08 0.00
0.09 0.00
&
&
0.06 0.00
Asia
Asia
0.00 0.00
Russia
Central
Russia
Central
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.07
0.08
2021
2021
0.00
0.10 0.00
0.18 0.00
0.21 0.03
0.11 0.11
0.33 0.10
&
2022
2022
&
0.26 0.08
0.17
South
0.04
South
Central
Central
America
0.20
America
0.04
0.42 0.05
0.15 0.04
0.30 0.05
0.23 0.04
0.09 0.02
0.11 0.03
0.15 0.05
0.12 0.03
ALL
ALL
0.11 0.02
0.07 0.02
REGIONS
REGIONS
0.11 0.02
0.05 0.02
Tier 1 PSE per million work hours Tier 1 PSE per million work hours
- drilling onshore - drilling onshore
Figure 43:
Figure 42:
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.09 0.03
0.03 0.03
0.03 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.09 0.00
0.06 0.08
0.00 0.05
Africa
Africa
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.09 0.00
2013
2013
0.05 0.04
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Asia/
Asia/
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2014
2014
0.00 0.00
Australasia
Australasia
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.04
0.00 0.04
0.00 0.00
2015
2015
0.14 0.00
0.17 0.00
0.06 0.05
0.00 0.00
Europe
Europe
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.11
0.11 0.00
2016
2016
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.02
0.00 0.06
0.00 0.03
2017
2017
0.00 0.00
East
East
0.00 0.00
Middle
Middle
0.00 0.03
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 45
0.08 0.10
2018
2018
0.09 0.06
0.06 0.04
0.00 0.04
0.00 0.09
0.00 0.05
North
North
0.05 0.10
2019
2019
America
America
0.00 0.08
0.00 0.05
0.00 0.04
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.04
0.00 0.08
2020
2020
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
&
&
0.00 0.00
Asia
Asia
0.00 0.00
Russia
Russia
Central
Central
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.10
2021
2021
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.04
0.00 0.14
0.14 0.07
2022
2022
&
&
0.00 0.15
0.00 0.06
South
South
Central
Central
America
America
0.04 0.04
0.00 0.07
0.00 0.08
0.06 0.04
0.05 0.04
0.02 0.03
0.02 0.04
0.06 0.04
0.02 0.05
ALL
ALL
0.01 0.03
0.01 0.03
REGIONS
REGIONS
0.00 0.03
0.01 0.02
Tier 2 PSE per million work hours Tier 2 PSE per million work hours
- drilling offshore - drilling onshore
Figure 45:
Figure 44:
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.31 0.26
0.24 0.00
0.16 0.00
0.05 0.00
0.00 0.04
0.07 0.05
0.10 0.09
Africa
Africa
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.09 0.00
0.17 0.03
2013
2013
0.04 0.02
0.05 0.04
0.07 0.04
0.14 0.08
Asia/
Asia/
0.00 0.00
0.02 0.00
2014
2014
Australasia
Australasia
0.05 0.00
0.02 0.00
0.48 0.07
0.52 0.11
0.38 0.00
0.38 0.00
2015
2015
0.76 0.00
0.43 0.00
0.27 0.00
Europe
Europe
0.20 0.00
0.13 0.00
0.17 0.00
2016
2016
0.00 0.07
0.00 0.13
0.00 0.04
0.06 0.03
0.00 0.02
0.00 0.02
2017
2017
East
East
0.00 0.01
Middle
Middle
0.00 0.03
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
0.92 0.57
/ 46
Note: Drilling PSE Rate excludes PSE where no related drilling work hours were reported.
2018
2018
0.14 0.61
0.07 0.10
See Tables B.21 – B.30 (Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function).
0.25 0.33
0.17 0.27
0.00 0.23
North
North
0.05 0.38
America
America
0.06 0.15
2019
2019
0.07 0.25
0.00 0.08
0.33 0.00
0.30 0.00
0.00 0.04
2020
2020
0.17 0.00
0.10 0.08
&
&
0.15 0.00
Asia
Asia
0.00 0.00
Russia
Russia
Central
Central
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.18 0.00
2021
2021
0.41 0.00
0.17 0.18
0.18 0.22
0.00 0.15
0.57 0.15
&
&
2022
2022
0.14 0.37
0.20 0.16
South
South
Central
Central
America
America
0.27 0.14
0.06 0.57
0.00 0.26
0.42 0.22
0.21 0.24
0.13 0.07
0.16 0.08
0.24 0.09
0.13 0.11
ALL
ALL
0.08 0.12
0.09 0.06
REGIONS
REGIONS
0.05 0.16
0.04 0.06
Tier 2 PSE per million work hours Tier 1 PSE per million work hours
- production overall - production overall
Figure 47:
Figure 46:
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.58 0.29
0.32 0.18
0.35 0.19
0.29 0.16
0.39 0.17
0.32 0.11
7.2 Production
0.06
Africa
0.30
Africa
0.29 0.14
0.26 0.14
0.19 0.11
0.29 0.08
0.22 0.08
2013
2013
0.28 0.09
0.28 0.11
0.46 0.16
0.26 0.04
Asia/
0.04
Asia/
0.12
0.17 0.04
Australasia
0.02
2014
2014
Australasia
0.16
0.14 0.04
0.66 0.09
0.51 0.11
0.54 0.11
0.46 0.14
2015
2015
0.44 0.08
0.54 0.13
0.30 0.10
Europe
Europe
0.45 0.10
0.39 0.07
0.16 0.14
2016
2016
0.71 0.21
0.37 0.11
0.39 0.07
0.30 0.18
0.16 0.05
0.26 0.09
2017
2017
East
East
0.16 0.08
Middle
Middle
0.35 0.16
0.19 0.04
0.06 0.01
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
1.47 0.71
/ 47
0.33
2018
2018
0.95
0.77 0.39
1.58 0.57
1.64 0.54
1.63 0.69
North
0.53
North
1.69
America
0.77
America
1.85
2019
2019
1.75 0.57
1.65 0.43
1.13 0.09
1.12 0.02
0.90 0.06
2020
2020
0.15 0.02
0.07 0.03
&
&
0.13 0.61
Asia
Asia
1.03 0.70
Russia
Russia
Central
Central
0.07 0.01
0.16 0.04
0.11 0.02
2021
2021
0.67 0.10
0.66 0.10
1.31 0.29
1.02 0.37
0.38 0.13
&
&
2022
2022
0.42 0.09
0.64 0.12
South
South
Central
Central
America
0.11
America
0.49
0.53 0.22
0.71 0.23
0.75 0.25
0.60 0.18
0.59 0.19
0.56 0.21
0.46 0.15
0.46 0.19
ALL
ALL
0.51 0.18
0.42 0.15
REGIONS
REGIONS
0.45 0.15
0.45 0.14
Tier 1 PSE per million work hours Tier 1 PSE per million work hours
- production offshore - production onshore
Figure 49:
Figure 48:
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.17 0.33
0.13 0.20
0.33 0.15
0.15 0.17
0.30 0.14
0.13 0.11
0.19 0.02
Africa
Africa
0.31 0.10
0.19 0.13
0.14 0.10
0.06 0.10
0.08 0.08
2013
2013
0.02 0.15
0.05 0.17
0.13 0.18
0.07 0.01
Asia/
Asia/
0.05 0.03
0.02 0.05
2014
2014
Australasia
Australasia
0.01 0.04
0.03 0.05
0.14 0.04
0.11 0.12
0.14 0.08
0.20 0.07
2015
2015
0.09 0.08
0.10 0.16
0.11 0.08
Europe
Europe
0.06 0.13
0.06 0.07
0.18 0.09
2016
2016
0.15 0.21
0.00 0.13
0.07 0.07
0.32 0.17
0.06 0.05
0.05 0.10
2017
2017
East
East
0.02 0.10
Middle
Middle
0.00 0.24
0.00 0.06
0.00 0.01
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
0.12 0.87
/ 48
2018
2018
0.04 0.53
0.03 0.74
0.20 0.64
0.06 0.63
0.25 0.75
North
North
0.06 0.59
America
America
0.19 0.86
2019
2019
0.40 0.58
0.00 0.46
0.00 0.11
Tier 1 PSE Rate – production onshore
2020
2020
0.00 0.02
0.00 0.04
&
&
0.00 0.77
Asia
Asia
0.00 0.78
Russia
Russia
Central
Central
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.05
0.03 0.02
2021
2021
0.00 0.19
0.00 0.12
0.11 0.33
0.45 0.35
0.11 0.14
&
&
2022
2022
0.07 0.11
0.14 0.10
South
South
Central
Central
America
America
0.11 0.12
0.06 0.33
0.11 0.32
0.10 0.33
0.07 0.23
0.07 0.25
0.13 0.25
0.11 0.17
0.08 0.24
ALL
ALL
0.09 0.22
0.07 0.19
REGIONS
REGIONS
0.05 0.19
0.07 0.18
Tier 2 PSE per million work hours Tier 2 PSE per million work hours
- production offshore - production onshore
Figure 51:
Figure 50:
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
0.77 0.52
0.73 0.20
0.77 0.22
0.44 0.23
0.57 0.35
0.69 0.23
0.44 0.26
Africa
Africa
0.53 0.24
0.35 0.23
0.30 0.15
0.28 0.29
0.19 0.24
2013
2013
0.34 0.25
0.30 0.26
0.69 0.27
0.32 0.20
Asia/
Asia/
0.14 0.10
0.21 0.12
2014
2014
Australasia
Australasia
0.15 0.17
0.12 0.16
0.79 0.54
0.68 0.30
0.75 0.32
0.74 0.19
2015
2015
0.50 0.37
0.70 0.38
0.36 0.23
Europe
Europe
0.38 0.50
0.40 0.38
0.14 0.18
2016
2016
0.58 0.72
0.35 0.38
0.28 0.41
0.32 0.30
0.11 0.18
0.05 0.29
2017
2017
East
East
0.07 0.20
Middle
Middle
0.07 0.48
0.01 0.26
0.07 0.05
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
0.93 1.62
/ 49
2018
2018
0.11 1.52
0.14 1.21
See Tables B.22 – B.40 (Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function).
0.59 1.78
0.56 1.83
0.75 1.76
Note: Production PSE Rate excludes PSE where no related production work hours were reported.
North
North
0.57 1.83
America
America
0.48 2.05
2019
2019
0.69 1.82
0.24 1.76
0.05 1.47
Tier 2 PSE Rate – production onshore
2020
2020
0.06 0.19
0.11 0.07
&
&
0.00 0.20
Asia
Asia
0.18 1.13
Russia
Russia
Central
Central
0.67 0.04
0.27 0.15
0.14 0.09
2021
2021
0.58 0.76
0.46 0.72
1.06 1.37
0.90 1.04
0.36 0.39
&
&
2022
2022
0.45 0.39
0.48 0.73
South
South
Central
Central
America
America
0.49 0.49
0.25 0.73
0.27 1.06
0.54 0.84
0.32 0.76
0.39 0.69
0.48 0.60
0.43 0.47
0.42 0.48
ALL
ALL
0.28 0.62
0.30 0.48
REGIONS
REGIONS
0.22 0.56
0.17 0.61
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
8. Company results
Tier 1 and Tier 2 PSE rates are shown by company in rank order of Tier 1 PSE performance. Company names
have been replaced with a 2-letter code. A new code is assigned every year.
Data are excluded from PSE rate calculations where either drilling or production work hours are not reported for
the data set.
Figure 52:
Performance ranking of participating companies – PSE rate 2022
3.24
1.4
1.2
PSE per million work hours
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
FT
AL
GQ
NM
SF
IK
TY
AI
JG
XF
AT
BV
XB
XA
EK
IR
WC
KX
YB
JJ
BK
BS
PP
TC
YE
WR
IG
HX
JL
AN
RP
EN
NH
JW
CC
LL
RU
UC
AG
JF
QA
RV
RO
DO
MB
YJ
Company code
Tier 1 PSE rate Tier 2 PSE rate 2022 Tier 1 Overall (0.12) 2022 Tier 2 Overall (0.37)
Figure 53:
Performance ranking of participating companies reporting more than 20 million work hours
- PSE rate 2022
3.5
3.0
PSE per million work hours
- related hours >20 million
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
FT
GQ
SF
IK
TY
AT
XA
EK
IR
BS
WC
IG
HX
AN
LL
RU
Company code
Tier 1 PSE rate Tier 2 PSE rate 2022 Tier 1 Overall (0.12) 2022 Tier 2 Overall (0.37)
/ 50
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Figure 54:
Performance ranking of participating companies reporting less than 20 million work hours
- PSE rate 2022
1.4
1.2
- related hours <=20 million
PSE per million work hours
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
AL
NM
AI
JG
XF
BV
XB
KX
YB
JJ
BK
PP
TC
YE
WR
JL
RP
EN
NH
JW
CC
UC
AG
JF
QA
RV
RO
DO
MB
YJ
Company code
Tier 1 PSE rate Tier 2 PSE rate 2022 Tier 1 Overall (0.09) 2022 Tier 2 Overall (0.39)
/ 51
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
PSE relating to sabotage or wilful damage are excluded from the results presented in sections 1–7, but are
reported separately in section 1.2.
Countries and companies that are subject to international sanctions are not featured in this Report for 2022 data.
The entire IOGP safety performance database, which is used to produce the annual Safety performance
indicators report (IOGP Report 2022s), contains work hours which are split into offshore and onshore work hours
and five work function categories (defined in the glossary of terms in 2022s - Safety performance indicators -
2022 data as work functions):
exploration
drilling
production
construction
unspecified
For the purposes of the process safety event database, the only applicable functional categories from the entire
IOGP safety performance database are drilling and production, onshore and offshore. The work hours associated
with PSEs reported in 2013-2022 for drilling and production, onshore and offshore, are shown in Table A.1, below.
Number of companies reporting PSE Data sets where PSE data reported Related work hours (millions)*
/ 52
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table A.2: Work hours related to datasets where either Tier 1 or Tier 2 PSE were reported
The work hours associated with the PSE data reported have been calculated as a subset of the drilling and
production function work hours from the safety performance database (see IOGP Report 2022s - Safety
performance indicators – 2022 data) which have been reported for 2013-2022. Work hours have been used as a
reference to provide an indication of scope for the PSE data presented throughout this report.
Work hours have been included where the company has reported associated Tier 1 or Tier 2 PSE (PSE values of
zero or greater), for the country and onshore/offshore location (data set). Work hours are excluded for data sets
where Tier 1 or Tier 2 PSE figures are not available. The associated work hours differ between Tier 1 and Tier 2
because, although all companies reported both Tier 1 and Tier 2 PSE data, not all companies reported PSE data
for all of their global operations.
Some companies that reported PSE data do not split work hours by work function. The reported PSEs and work
hours associated with these companies have therefore been excluded from the normalized analysis. Table A.3
shows the number of data sets reported that include Tier 1 or Tier 2 data as well as related drilling or production
work hours.
/ 53
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 54
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 55
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Recordable injury as
Onshore / Work hours Number of Tier 2 PSE consequence fatalities
Year offshore (thousands) for normalized results* Number of Tier 2 PSE Tier 2 PSE rate (number Tier 2 PSE)
/ 56
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.3: Number of PSE and PSE Rate onshore and offshore
Number of PSE for normalized PSE rate (PSE per million work
Number of PSE results* hours)*
/ 57
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Year Onshore/offshore Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 58
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE – onshore 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
/ 59
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE – offshore 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
/ 60
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.7: Causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE – drilling and completion operations
Causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE – drilling and completion operations 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
/ 61
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Causal factors assigned to Tier 1 PSE – production 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate
28 49 47 58 63 54 67 47 50
maintenance/inspection/testing
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate
18 54 41 40 37 60 27 34 46
design/specification/management of change
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate/defective
28 31 30 34 45 44 23 61 36
tools/equipment/materials/products
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate work standards/procedures 14 34 42 24 27 37 21 23 27
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Deviation unintentional (by individual or group) 6 25 13 21 8 29 10 15 25
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment 8 36 36 44 27 40 20 27 22
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices 8 24 19 8 7 16 17 14 20
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers 8 22 23 11 19 13 15 8 16
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Storms or acts of nature 1 8 14 3 9 11 3 17 11
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate communication 10 13 17 8 11 14 10 10 11
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress 12 15 7 6 8 7 6 5 11
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate supervision 4 8 13 16 9 20 10 11 10
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate training/competence 11 13 19 21 12 21 13 14 9
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Improper decision making or lack of judgment 12 26 22 10 12 11 8 9 8
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Improper use/position of
9 6 6 9 4 5 3 3 6
tools/equipment/materials/products
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Servicing of energized
1 3 2 2 3 4 2 1 6
equipment/inadequate energy isolation
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Improper position (in the line of fire) 0 5 4 2 1 1 2 4 5
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Failure to warn of hazard 2 6 11 2 3 7 6 3 5
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Failure to report/learn from events 1 13 9 4 9 4 3 3 4
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Equipment or materials not secured 1 1 9 2 2 4 1 1 4
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) 2 3 3 3 2 3 9 4 3
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Deviation intentional (by individual or group) 4 4 6 1 3 3 0 3 3
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate security provisions or systems 0 2 3 0 1 2 1 0 2
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Inadequate use of safety systems 3 5 9 1 3 6 2 4 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Improper lifting or loading 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Personal Protective Equipment not used or used
2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1
improperly
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Fatigue 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment 0 3 3 1 1 3 0 5 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety
1 4 5 2 4 2 2 2 0
devices
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Poor leadership/organizational culture 0 8 4 8 5 2 2 1 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Congestion, clutter or restricted motion 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Work or motion at improper speed 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Acts of violence 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Use of drugs or alcohol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
/ 62
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Causal factors assigned to fatal incidents 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Improper position (in the line of fire) 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 3
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 2
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Improper decision making or lack of judgment 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate supervision 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate training/competence 2 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Deviation unintentional (by individual or group) 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Servicing of energized
0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
equipment/inadequate energy isolation
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate
0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
maintenance/inspection/testing
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate work standards/procedures 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Deviation intentional (by individual or group) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Inadequate communication 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Personal Protective Equipment not used or used
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
improperly
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Equipment or materials not secured 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Failure to warn of hazard 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
design/specification/management of change
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Storms or acts of nature 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Failure to report/learn from events 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Inadequate use of safety systems 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Inadequate/defective
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
tools/equipment/materials/products
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Fatigue 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Protective Methods : Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
devices
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products : Improper use/position of
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
tools/equipment/materials/products
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Protective Systems : Inadequate security provisions or systems 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Organizational : Poor leadership/organizational culture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PROCESS (CONDITIONS) : Work Place Hazards : Congestion, clutter or restricted motion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Work or motion at improper speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Following Procedures : Improper lifting or loading 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Acts of violence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEOPLE (ACTS) : Inattention/Lack of Awareness : Use of drugs or alcohol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
/ 63
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Causal factors assigned to high potential events 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
/ 64
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Number of drilling PSE for normalized PSE rate (PSE per million work hours)* -
Number of drilling PSE results* drilling
/ 65
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Companies reporting PSE data – drilling Related work hours (millions)* – drilling Data sets – drilling
/ 66
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Number of production PSE for PSE rate (PSE per million work hours)* -
Number of production PSE normalized results* production
/ 67
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 68
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 69
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Community
Year Fatality or LWDC Third party hospitalization evacuation Fire or explosion PRD discharges Material release
2013 15 2 7 28 24 230
2014 19 0 10 29 13 217
2015 23 0 1 27 13 195
2016 17 1 2 25 16 144
2017 16 0 2 14 8 151
2018 9 1 2 15 5 221
2019 10 1 1 15 15 225
2020 11 3 0 14 6 168
2021 13 1 3 20 11 179
2022 16 0 0 19 6 145
/ 70
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 71
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Percentage of total reported Number of Companies Number of related work Number of data sets where
PSE where information on reporting PSE data by hours (millions) where PSE PSE reported by
TIER 1 consequence was provided consequence reported by consequence consequence
2013 98% 24 613 63
2014 99% 28 811 68
2015 98% 28 660 62
2016 99% 22 510 61
2017 98% 26 863 70
2018 98% 28 794 59
2019 99% 27 813 63
2020 100% 27 619 55
2021 99% 21 655 53
2022 100% 23 570 47
Percentage of total reported Number of Companies Number of related work Number of data sets where
PSE where information on reporting PSE data by hours (millions) where PSE PSE reported by
TIER 2 consequence was provided consequence reported by consequence consequence
/ 72
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
TIER 1 Toxics Flammable gas Hazardous liquid Other gases or liquids Unspecified
2013 11 72 128 16 64
2014 5 88 112 19 52
2015 9 91 107 10 37
2016 5 63 76 8 40
2017 9 70 80 10 23
2018 3 54 158 9 32
2019 5 67 89 7 93
2020 6 61 76 20 21
2021 6 53 99 21 14
2022 5 63 92 16 6
TIER 2 Toxics Flammable gas Hazardous liquid Other gases or liquids Unspecified
2013 31 203 418 70 190
2014 13 281 368 76 154
2015 12 237 396 54 96
2016 11 169 230 48 257
2017 20 175 246 76 100
2018 9 156 322 77 43
2019 5 169 296 56 269
2020 6 178 251 54 47
2021 9 168 293 108 44
2022 16 157 343 41 6
Note: Material is only specified where 1 or more PSE are reported.
/ 73
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
2013 23 584 91
2014 31 726 119
2015 31 808 113
2016 24 534 88
2017 26 838 99
2018 31 810 87
2019 28 934 90
2020 29 795 96
2021 29 902 86
2022 32 767 70
Note 1: Material is only specified where 1 or more PSE are reported.
Note 2: Related work hours were not provided for all reported PSE.
/ 74
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 75
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 76
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 77
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
2013 Tier 1 4 4 1 0 10 0 0 19
2013 Tier 2 20 4 13 3 77 2 2 121
2014 Tier 1 2 4 1 0 11 1 0 19
2014 Tier 2 8 12 15 4 63 2 5 109
2015 Tier 1 1 0 0 1 5 2 1 10
2015 Tier 2 5 2 10 2 17 1 6 43
2016 Tier 1 0 0 3 4 1 0 2 10
2016 Tier 2 1 2 8 3 13 1 2 30
2017 Tier 1 2 0 3 2 4 0 5 16
2017 Tier 2 1 2 13 1 15 2 16 50
2018 Tier 1 3 0 2 0 2 0 4 11
2018 Tier 2 2 4 7 1 9 1 12 36
2019 Tier 1 1 0 0 0 6 0 2 9
2019 Tier 2 4 0 5 1 20 0 11 41
2020 Tier 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 6
2020 Tier 2 0 1 3 2 5 0 10 21
2021 Tier 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 6
2021 Tier 2 0 2 2 1 6 0 26 37
2022 Tier 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 5
2022 Tier 2 0 1 3 0 2 1 7 14
*Excludes PSE where no related drilling work hours were reported.
See Tables B.31 – B.40 (Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function).
/ 78
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 79
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.31: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2013
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.32: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2014
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 80
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.33: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2015
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.34: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2016
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 81
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.35: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2017
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.36: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2018
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 82
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.37: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2019
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.38: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2020
Tier 1 Tier 2
Africa Drilling 0 0 0 0 0 0
Africa Production 13 10 23 32 17 49
Africa OVERALL 13 10 23 32 17 49
Asia / Australasia Drilling 0 0 0 0 1 1
Asia / Australasia Production 7 3 10 17 26 43
Asia / Australasia OVERALL 7 3 10 17 27 44
Europe Drilling 0 0 0 0 3 3
Europe Production 7 3 10 28 18 46
Europe OVERALL 7 3 10 28 21 49
Middle East Drilling 2 0 2 2 0 2
Middle East Production 38 0 38 76 5 81
Middle East OVERALL 40 0 40 78 5 83
North America Drilling 2 0 2 4 1 5
North America Production 64 2 66 153 5 158
North America OVERALL 66 2 68 157 6 163
Russia & Central Asia Drilling 0 0 0 0 0 0
Russia & Central Asia Production 1 0 1 3 3 6
Russia & Central Asia OVERALL 1 0 1 3 3 6
South & Central America Drilling 1 1 2 4 6 10
South & Central America Production 12 7 19 51 31 82
South & Central America OVERALL 13 8 21 55 37 92
OVERALL Drilling 5 1 6 10 11 21
OVERALL Production 142 25 167 360 105 465
OVERALL OVERALL 147 26 173 370 116 486
/ 83
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.39: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2021
Tier 1 Tier 2
Africa Drilling 0 0 0 0 0 0
Africa Production 17 7 24 30 13 43
Africa OVERALL 17 7 24 30 13 43
Asia / Australasia Drilling 0 0 0 0 2 2
Asia / Australasia Production 5 1 6 19 19 38
Asia / Australasia OVERALL 5 1 6 19 21 40
Europe Drilling 1 0 1 0 2 2
Europe Production 4 4 8 22 25 47
Europe OVERALL 5 4 9 22 27 49
Middle East Drilling 0 0 0 1 0 1
Middle East Production 12 0 12 50 1 51
Middle East OVERALL 12 0 12 51 1 52
North America Drilling 1 0 1 5 1 6
North America Production 87 4 91 273 7 280
North America OVERALL 88 4 92 278 8 286
Russia & Central Asia Drilling 1 0 1 0 0 0
Russia & Central Asia Production 6 0 6 19 3 22
Russia & Central Asia OVERALL 7 0 7 19 3 22
South & Central America Drilling 3 0 3 25 1 26
South & Central America Production 35 5 40 77 19 96
South & Central America OVERALL 38 5 43 102 20 122
OVERALL Drilling 6 0 6 31 6 37
OVERALL Production 166 21 187 490 87 577
OVERALL OVERALL 172 21 193 521 93 614
Table B.40: Number of PSE used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
Africa Drilling 0 0 0 0 0 0
Africa Production 14 6 20 21 13 34
Africa OVERALL 14 6 20 21 13 34
Asia / Australasia Drilling 0 0 0 0 1 1
Asia / Australasia Production 6 3 9 19 14 33
Asia / Australasia OVERALL 6 3 9 19 15 34
Europe Drilling 0 2 2 0 3 3
Europe Production 6 13 19 12 10 22
Europe OVERALL 6 15 21 12 13 25
Middle East Drilling 0 0 0 0 0 0
Middle East Production 1 0 1 6 6 12
Middle East OVERALL 1 0 1 6 6 12
North America Drilling 1 0 1 2 0 2
North America Production 77 0 77 293 3 296
North America OVERALL 78 0 78 295 3 298
Russia & Central Asia Drilling 0 0 0 0 1 1
Russia & Central Asia Production 1 1 2 6 5 11
Russia & Central Asia OVERALL 1 1 2 6 6 12
South & Central America Drilling 2 0 2 7 0 7
South & Central America Production 34 9 43 112 22 134
South & Central America OVERALL 36 9 45 119 22 141
OVERALL Drilling 3 2 5 9 5 14
OVERALL Production 139 32 171 469 73 542
OVERALL OVERALL 142 34 176 478 78 556
/ 84
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Tables B.41–50 show the number of work hours in the main safety database for which there were related PSE
data (even if zero), i.e., those that were included in the calculation of PSE per million work hours in this report.
Table B.41: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2013
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 85
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.42: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2014
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.43: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2015
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 86
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.44: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2016
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.45: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2017
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 87
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.46: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2018
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.47: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2019
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 88
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.48: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2020
Tier 1 Tier 2
Table B.49: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2021
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 89
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Table B.50: Number of work hours (000’s) used in normalized analysis – by region and function – 2022
Tier 1 Tier 2
/ 90
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 91
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 92
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The table below shows the 107 countries for which PSE data were reported in 2014.
/ 93
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The table below shows the 100 countries for which PSE data were reported in 2015.
/ 94
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The table below shows the 95 countries for which PSE data were reported in 2016.
/ 95
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The table below shows the 96 countries for which PSE data were reported in 2017.
/ 96
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The table below shows the 94 countries for which PSE data were reported in 2018.
/ 97
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The table below shows the 87 countries for which PSE data were reported in 2019.
/ 98
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
The table below shows the 71 countries for which PSE data were reported in 2020.
/ 99
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 100
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
/ 101
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Asset integrity
Asset integrity is related to the prevention of major incidents. It is an outcome of good design, construction and
operating practice. It is achieved when facilities are structurally and mechanically sound and perform the
processes and produce the products for which they were designed.
Barrier
A risk control that seeks to prevent unintended events from occurring, or prevent escalation of events into
incidents with harmful consequences.
Fatality
Involves one person who died as a result of a work-related incident.
First aid
A consequence of an event that required medical attention, often consisting of one-time, short-term treatment
and requiring little technology or training to administer. First aid can include cleaning minor cuts, scrapes, or
scratches; treating a minor burn; applying bandages and dressings; the use of non-prescription medicine;
draining blisters; removing debris from the eyes; massage; and drinking fluids to relieve heat stress. A full list of
14 first aid treatments is provided in the IOGP Safety Performance Indicators User Guide. First aid cases are not
classified as recordable incidents for the purpose of reporting to IOGP but may be used by companies as a
criterion for reporting of events as Tier 3 KPIs.
ipieca
The global oil and gas association for advancing environmental and social performance across the energy
transition.
/ 102
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
For drilling operations, any unplanned or uncontrolled release to the surface (seabed or ground level) should be
included. LOPC is a type of event. An unplanned or uncontrolled release is an LOPC irrespective of whether the
material is released into the environment, or into secondary containment, or into other primary containment not
intended to contain the material released under normal operating conditions).
Major incident
Hazardous event that results in:
Precautionary (evacuation, public protective measure, shelter-in-place) [From API RP 754 (2nd
edition)]
A measure taken from an abundance of caution.
For example, a Company may require all workers to shelter-in-place in response to an LOPC independent of or
prior to any assessment (e.g. wind direction, distance from the LOPC, etc.) of the potential hazard to those
workers.
For example, a recognized community official (e.g. fire, police, civil defence, emergency management) may order
a community shelter-in-place, evacuation, or public protective measure (e.g. road closure) in the absence of
information from a Company experiencing a process safety event, or just in case the wind direction changes, or
due to the sensitive nature of the potentially affected population (e.g. school children, the elderly).
/ 103
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
NOTE: A PRD discharge is a LOPC due to the nature of the unplanned release. The PRD discharge is evaluated
against the consequence criteria to determine if it is a Tier 1 or 2 PSE.
Primary containment
A tank, vessel, pipe, truck, rail car, or other equipment designed to keep a material within it, typically for
purposes of storage, separation, processing or transfer of gases or liquids. The terms vessel and pipe are taken
to include containment of reservoir fluids within the casing and wellhead valving to the surface. Note that
primary containment for a specified material may comprise a vessel or pipe that is inside another vessel that is
also designed as primary containment for a different material; for example, a heating tube is primary
containment for fuel gas or fuel oil, even though the tubes may be inside a firebox which is in turn within an oil-
water separator.
Process
Facilities used in drilling and production operations in the oil and gas industry. This includes rigs and process
equipment (e.g. vessels, piping, valves, boilers, generators, pumps, compressors, exchangers, refrigeration
systems) and includes storage tanks, ancillary support areas (e.g. boiler houses and waste water treatment
plants), on-site remediation facilities, and distribution piping under control of the Company.
Sabotage
Deliberately destroy, damage, or obstruct (something).
/ 104
IOGP safety performance indicators – process safety events - 2022 data
Tier
One of the four levels of the IOGP framework for process safety KPIs as described in IOGP Report 456, which is in
turn based on the API RP 754 (2nd edition).
Wilful damage
Wilful or malicious damage or destruction of the property of another.
/ 105
The Process Safety Event data presented in
this Report are based on voluntary
submissions from participating IOGP
Member Companies and are not
necessarily representative of the entire
upstream oil and gas industry.
https://data.iogp.org