Sca2023 025
Sca2023 025
Abstract. Wettability is one of the key inputs for digital rock simulations to calculate multiphase fluid transport
properties. Reservoir rocks have spatially varying wettability that depends on local pressure, temperature, surface
roughness, and mineral and fluid compositions. Here, a multiphase lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is used to
simulate a capillary pressure drainage simulation in an initially water-wet Berea sandstone, utilizing wettability
inputs derived from fully atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. When oil invades the pore space as the
capillary pressure is increased, a fraction of the pore-grain surface is altered from a water-wet to an oil-wet condition.
The eligibility for alteration takes into account local capillary pressure, disjoining pressure, and micro-scale surface
roughness. Wettability inputs to the multiphase simulation are contact angles, calculated from molecular dynamics
simulations of oil droplets on mineral surfaces with hydrophilic and hydrophobic surface chemistry. The multiphase
workflow demonstrates an iterative process where wettability is altered along with quasi-static fluid flow resulting
in spatially varying wetting conditions of the simulated rock sample. The study investigates the slow dynamics of
oil invasion and wettability alteration, taking into account the micro-scale pore shape dependence of the rock. The
wettability distributions are compared with an image-based geometric intrusion analysis which mimics mercury
intrusion porosimetry. The resulting wettability distribution holds the potential to enhance the realistic prediction of
transport properties under in-situ reservoir conditions.
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
The 36th International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts
sample filled with brine and aged for few weeks. Recently, a mechanism for wettability alteration is considered by
complementary numerical procedure to mimic aging was substituting functional groups capping the mineral surface,
proposed [21]. However, the underlying molecular from hydroxyl groups (-OH) in the presence of water to alkyl
mechanisms for obtaining spatially variant wettability groups (-CnH2n+1) as oil intrudes into the pores. As the oil-
distributions was lacking in that initial approach. water interface moves along the mineral surface, this
functional group substitution ultimately triggers the
Determining wettability and the initial fluid distribution using wettability alteration, as contact angles change from water-
digital rock simulations is a complicated and challenging wet to oil-wet, shown later in this paper.
problem that spans the molecular to micro-scales. When oil
intrudes the brine-filled pore space for the first time, the The following section describes the molecular dynamics and
grains are usually coated with a thin water film. For the oil to multiphase fluid flow simulation methodologies, followed by
be in contact with the grains, this film needs to be ruptured, a description of the workflow for the coupling of these two
which can be described by the disjoining pressure theory [16- scales, along with details of the wettability alteration method.
18]. At the micro-scale, pore shape, curvature and surface Results from molecular dynamics and multiphase fluid
roughness are critical to determining whether the water film simulations are then discussed, followed by the conclusions
can be ruptured. Afterwards, based on the pore fluid pressure, and a discussion of future research directions.
temperature, and fluid and mineral compositions, oil can
create another layer on the initially water-wet surface and
make the surface oil-wet. At the molecular scale, surface
chemistry, temperature, pressure, and salinity play a major 2 Methodology
role in the wettability of mineral surfaces [19]. For example,
the concentration of silanol (-SiOH) functional groups on 2.1 Molecular dynamics simulation
quartz mineral surfaces can determine whether the wettability
conditions are water-wet or oil-wet, and surface Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations model atoms and
hydrophobicity may be increased through alkylation by molecules as interacting particles. The basic approach to all-
organics present in oil reservoirs and rock formations [20]. atom MD involves solving Newton’s second law for every
Thus, both molecularly driven physicochemical properties atom in the simulation, where atomic forces are determined
and micro-scale multiphase fluid flow play an important role by an intermolecular force field, which describes van der
in reservoir rock wettability. Waals forces, electrostatic interactions, and chemical
bonding between different atoms in the simulation [23].
In a previous study [21], a numerical methodology for Pressure and temperature can be controlled through
wettability alteration was implemented using a multiphase thermostats and barostats [24]. Since the force field
lattice Boltzmann method, utilizing a given disjoining inherently takes into account the chemistry of the atoms and
pressure isotherm and assuming certain contact angles for the molecules, its development typically involves quantum
oil-wet and water-wet conditions. The initial workflow mechanical calculations as well as rigorous benchmarking
showcased an iterative process for wettability alteration, against experimental data, and these force fields can be used
focusing on the force balance between curvature-based, for a range of materials and conditions. For an MD run, the
applied, and disjoining pressures. That study [21] also chemistry of the materials involved, their specific
discussed the possibility of extending the workflow using formulation and processing conditions, if applicable, is all
molecular dynamics simulations. Building upon this that is needed. Experimental data is not utilized for
framework, the current work integrates the wettability performing MD simulations. By comparing system
alteration CFD workflow with molecular dynamics behaviour or properties (such as density, viscosity,
simulations of three-phase wettability models [22] of oil diffusivity, miscibility, moduli, and stress-strain curves)
droplets in brine on mineral surfaces. In particular, we calculated from MD simulations against experimentally
simulated the change in contact angle of an oil/brine/quartz measured lab data, molecular dynamics results are rigorously
system when the quartz surface transforms from a water-wet validated. With over six decades [25] of research and
to an oil-wet condition under in-situ reservoir conditions development on applications of MD simulations, it has
using molecular dynamics. The computed contact angles are become a mainstay in geochemistry, catalyst design,
provided as inputs to the multiphase LBM simulation, polymerization reaction optimization, and sustainable
whereas in previous work [21] they were assumed. innovation.
In this work, we describe a numerical digital rock workflow Since this technique is applicable to systems made up of any
starting from pore-scale 3D image acquisition to fluid flow element in the periodic table, it applies to a wide range of
simulation, including a previously demonstrated wettability topics. In the energy industry, specifically in the oil and gas
alteration process. Wettability alteration is carried out in a upstream sector, molecular dynamics simulations are used to
digitally reconstructed 3D pore-grain model, considering study extraction, transport and processing of hydrocarbons.
micro-scale interactions. In parallel, molecular dynamics Design and optimization of fracturing fluids, gaining key
simulations are performed at the reservoir pressure and insights into scale and hydrate formation [26], studying the
temperature for oil droplets in brine on mineral surfaces to aggregation behaviour of asphaltenes [27], and optimizing
calculate contact angles. The resulting contact angles are used sustainable and green catalysts [28] for oil refining are a few
in multiphase pore-scale fluid flow simulations to obtain examples where molecular dynamics simulations have been
spatial distributions of fluid wettability. A molecular
The 36th International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts
successfully applied. In the area of sustainability, molecular These surfels precisely define the boundaries between pores
dynamics simulations have been used to investigate CO2 and grains, resulting in accurate flux calculations near
absorption in porous materials such as MOFs [29, 30] and boundaries and better accuracy at lower numerical
zeolites [30], as well as in rocks and cement [31]. Critical resolutions. Moreover, the utilization of surfels enhances the
phenomena such as CO2 dissolution in brine present in calculation of local curvature and curvature-based pressure as
reservoir rocks [32], supercritical CO2 impact on degradation required for the wettability alteration workflow used in the
and ageing of elastomer [33] completion tools can also be current work.
simulated. Complex systems, such as the formation of oil
droplets on mineral surfaces [22], can be simulated and
2.3 Workflow description
tracked in both time and space, and thermodynamic and
dynamic properties [23] can be calculated, which can be
2.3.1 Sample Imaging
directly compared with experimental measurements.
As for the digital rock multiphase workflow, a 3D image of a
In this study, all MD simulations [34] were performed using
Berea sandstone sample is obtained using x-ray micro-
the quantum mechanics parameterized COMPASS
tomography (microCT). Figure 1 shows a sub-volume of the
(Condensed-phase Optimized Molecular Potentials for
3D microCT scan oriented perpendicular to the fluid
Atomistic Simulation Studies) III force field [35]. The
displacement direction. The 3D image went through image
COMPASS III force field is applicable to a broad range of
pre-processing, including artifact corrections, filtering and
molecules and polymers and accurately describes multiphase
subsequent segmentation, with details available in [42].
systems such as liquid-liquid equilibrium and was used in this
study because we are simulating three-phase wettability
models to predict oil in brine on mineral surface contact
angles.
Berendsen thermostat and barostat, respectively. Simulations angles are calculated by simulating oil droplet on top of a
were run for 5 ns using a 1 fs time step with atomic hydroxyl and alkyl treated quartz surface from the molecular
coordinates recorded every 50 ps. The oil droplets are fully dynamics simulation. We assumed that the increase in
formed within 2 ns, but an additional 3 ns of dynamics were capillary pressure during the drainage simulation is not
run to confirm that no significant changes occurred to the sufficient enough to warrant a significant change in contact
droplet shape. All intermolecular and intramolecular angles. Indeed, as evidenced from [59], the degree of pressure
interactions were modeled using the COMPASS III force change required to see any discernible change in surface
field [35], with van der Waals interactions truncated with a tension is a few of orders higher than the capillary pressure
cubic spline and a 1.25 nm cut-off. Electrostatic interactions change observed in the CFD simulation. Instead of
were summed using the Particle-Particle Particle-Mesh calculating the contact angle variations due to pressure
(PPPM) method [58]. change, we simulated the change in contact angle by
modelling changes of functional groups (hydroxyl for water-
2.3.5. Wettability alteration wet and alkyl for oil-wet) capping the quartz surface. Thus,
the MD simulations are performed only once and the
The current workflow involves the integration of molecular computed contact angle values are used as inputs in various
and micro-scale fluid simulation data to achieve wettability pressure stages of CFD simulation. At step-2, the curvature
alteration. Firstly, molecular dynamics simulations are of the pore/grain boundary is calculated at each voxel of the
employed to calculate the oil/water contact angle for a fully 3d micro-CT image, as
hydroxylated (water-wet) and alkylated quartz surface (oil-
wet). Secondly, utilizing the contact angle inputs obtained
̅|
𝑃𝑣 = 𝜎|𝐻 (1)
Fig. 3. Molecular dynamics and lattice Boltzmann workflow Here, 𝜎 and |𝐻 ̅| represent the interfacial tension and mean
for wettability alteration. curvature of the pore/grain boundary. Note that 𝑃𝑣 varies
spatially with the curvature of the pore/grain boundary and it
from the MD simulation, a primary drainage displacement is pre-computed before performing the multiphase LBM
simulation is conducted using the multiphase LBM method. simulation. In the multiphase LBM simulation (step-3), as the
pressure at the oil buffer increases, oil displaces water in the
Figure 3 provides a detailed overview of the workflow
implementation. At step-1, water-wet and oil-wet contact
The 36th International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts
Fig. 5. Various stages of wettability alteration simulation. The 1st quadrant in each figure shows an isosurface of oil, representing
oil pore volume (beige) and a volume rendering of water (blue), 2 nd quadrant shows the water saturation profile along the flow
direction, 3rd quadrant shows capillary pressure versus water saturation curve and 4th quadrant shows oil-wet (red) and water wet
(blue) surface within the pore space in 3D.
pore space, where the water-wet contact angle was Here, 𝑃𝑐 and Π 𝑚𝑎𝑥 represent the capillary pressure and
determined by the MD simulation for the hydroxylated maximum disjoining pressure, respectively. The capillary
surface. During the first iteration, surface fraction, 𝑆, defined pressure corresponds to the pressure difference between bulk
as the ratio of oil-wet and total surface area, is set to zero. oil/water phases within the pore space and is calculated from
the various stages of the CFD simulation as the pressure in oil
Once saturation has reached convergence for a given buffer is increased. The disjoining pressure indicates the
pressure, the following augmented Young-Laplace equation pressure needed to rupture the water film for the oil to make
(in step -5) is used to determine the eligibility of the grain contact with the grain surface. According to [16], when oil is
surface in the vicinity of the oil (step-4) for wettability pushed against a water-wet flat surface, the capillary pressure
alteration: resistance caused by pore curvature is absent, but a certain
level of pressure is still required for film breakage, known as
𝑃𝑐 > 𝑃𝑣 + Π max (2) the disjoining pressure. However, for a curved interface, both
The 36th International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts
4 Conclusion
was found to be significantly higher than that obtained from 5. M. Rücker, W.-B. Bartels, K. Singh, N. Brussee, A.
virtual MIP analysis at a given water saturation. The Coorn, H. A. van der Linde, A. Bonnin, H. Ott, S.
combination of slow dynamic wettability alteration and M. Hassanizadeh, M. J. Blunt, H. Mahani, A.
curvature effects offers an explanation for the observed Georgiadis, S. Berg, “The effect of mixed
wettability conditions in mixed-wet small reservoirs. wettability on pore-scale flow regimes based on a
flooding experiment in Ketton limestone,” Geophys.
Res. Lett. 46, 3225-3234 (2019).
Through a synergistic combination of atomistic molecular
dynamics and multiphase CFD fluid flow simulations, the 6. C. McPhee, J. Reed, I. Zubizarreta, “Chapter 7-
presented workflow enables wettability predictions based on wettability and wettability tests,” Developments in
first principles numerical simulations. The developed process Petroleum Science, 64, 313-345, (2015).
can serve as a valuable addition to laboratory procedures for
determining wettability. Simultaneously, it offers realistic 7. G. Garfi, C.M. John, M. Rücker, Q. Lin, C. Spurin,
inputs for a range of digital rock workflows, including S. Berg, S. Krevor, “Determination of the spatial
capillary pressure, relative permeability, and enhanced oil distribution of wetting in the pore networks of
recovery. Consequently, time-constrained projects can now Error! Bookmark not defined.”, J Colloid
embrace a combination of virtual and laboratory-based Interface Sci., 613, 786 (2022).
wettability assessment, resulting in enhanced uncertainty
quantification of the reservoirs. The present work forms the 8. G. Garfi, C.M. John, Q. Lin, S. Berg, S. Krevor,
basis for a more detailed analysis of disjoining pressure “Fluid surface coverage showing the controls of
isotherms. This will be the subject of future work. rock mineralogy on the wetting state,” Geophys.
Res. Lett. 47 (8) (2020).
List of Symbols and Notations 9. S. Foroughi, B. Bijeljic, Q. Lin, A.Q. Raeini, M.J.
Blunt, “Pore-by-pore modeling, analysis, and
prediction of two-phase flow in mixed-wet rocks,”
Phys. Rev. E 102, 02330 (2020).
2. W.G. Anderson, “Wettability literature survey-part 13. A.M. Alhammadi, A. AlRatrout, K. Singh, B.
5: The effects of wettability on relative Bijeljic, M.J. Blunt, “In situ characterization of
permeability,” J Pet Technol 39, 1453 (1987) mixed-wettability in a reservoir rock at subsurface
conditions”, Sci. Rep., 7, 10753 (2017).
3. Q. Lin, B. Bijeljic, S. Berg, R. Pini, M.J. Blunt, S.
Krevor, “Minimal surfaces in porous media: Pore- 14. M. Andrew, B. Bijeljic, M.J. Blunt, “Pore-scale
scale imaging of multiphase flow in an altered contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions
wettability Bentheimer sandstone”, Phys. Rev. E, 99, using X-ray microtomography”, Adv. Water
6 (2019). Resour., 68, 24 (2014).
4. M. Rücker , W.-B. Bartels , G. Garfi, M. Shams, T. 15. M. Prodanović, W.B. Lindquist, R.S. Seright,
Bultreys, M. Boone, S. Pieterse, G.C. Maitland, S. “Residual fluid blobs and contact angle
Krevor, V. Cnudde, H. Mahani, S. Berg, A. measurements from X-ray images of fluid
Georgiadis, P.F. Luckham, “Relationship between displacement,” XVI International Conference on
wetting and capillary pressure in a crude oil/brine/ Computational Methods in Water Resources,
rock system: From nano-scale to core-scale”, J (2006).
Colloid Interface Sci., 562, 159(2020)
The 36th International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts
16. C.J. Radke, A.R. Kovscek, H. Wong, “A pore-level 30. B. Liu and B. Smit, “Comparative Molecular
scenario for the development of mixed wettability in Simulation Study of CO2/N2 and CH4/N2 Separation
oil reservoirs,” SPE 24880, SPE Ann. Tech Conf. in Zeolites and Metal-Organic Frameworks,”
and Exhib., Washington, D.C. USA, Oct, 1992. Langmuir, 25, 5818-5926, 2009.
17. B.V. Derjaguin, E.V. Obukhov, "Anomalous 31. A. Al-Ostaz, W. Wu, A.H.-D. Cheng, C.R. Song, “A
properties of thin polymolecular films V.,” Acta molecular dynamics and microporomechanics study
Physicochim. URSS, 10(1), 25-44 (1939a). on the mechanical properties of major constituents
of hydrated cement” Composites Part B:
18. B.V. Derjaguin, E.V. Obukhov, "Anomalous Engineering, 41, 543-549, 2010.
properties of thin polymolecular films V.,” Acta
Physicochim. URSS, 10(2), 153-174 (1939b). 32. G. Javanbakht, M. Sedghi, W. Welch, L. Goual,
“Molecular Dynamics Simulations of
19. S. Iglauer, “CO2-water-rock wettability: variability, CO2/Water/Quartz Interfacial Properties: Impact of
influencing factors, and implications for CO2 CO2 Dissolution in Water,” Langmuir, 31, 5812-
geostorage“ Acc. Chem. Res., 50, 1134−1142, 2017. 5819, 2015.
20. J.S. Buckley, C. Bousseau, Y. Liu, “Wetting 33. M. Luo, Z.A. Putman, J. Incavo, M.Y. Huang, J.B.
alteration by brine and crude oil: from contact angles McLaughlin, S. Krishnan, “Molecular Simulations
to cores,” SPE J., 1, 341-350, 1996. and Experimental Characterization of Fluorinated
Nitrile Butadiene Elastomers with Low H2S
21. A. Islam, R. T. Salazar, B. Crouse, “Digital rock
Permeability,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 58, 14823-
workflow to calculate wettability distribution in a
14838, 2019
reservoir rock,” SCA 2022-024, Int. Symp. Soc.
Core Analysts, Austin, TX, USA, (2022). 34. BIOVIA, Dassault Systèmes, Materials Studio,
2022, San Diego: Dassault Systèmes, 2022.
22. S. Xu, J. Wang, J. Wu, Q. Liu, C. Sun, B. Bai, “Oil
contact angles in a water-decane-silicon dioxide 35. R.L.C. Akkermans, N.A. Spenley, S.H. Robertson,
system: effects of surface charge,” Nanoscale “COMPASS III: Automated Fitting Workflows and
Research Letters, 13, 1-9, 2018. Extension to Ionic Liquids,” Mol. Sim., 47, 540-551,
2021.
23. K.E. Gubbins and J.D. Moore, “Molecular modeling
of matter: Impact and prospects in engineering,” Ind. 36. S. Chen and G. Doolen, “Lattice Boltzmann method
Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 3026-3046, 2010. for fluid flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 30, 329
(1998).
24. G.J. Martyna, D.J. Tobias, M.L. Klein, “Constant
pressure molecular dynamics algorithms,” J. Chem. 37. S. Chen, H. Chen, D. Martinez, and W.
Phys., 101, 4177-4189, 1994. Mattheus,“Lattice Boltzmann model for simulation
of magnetohydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 67,
25. B.J. Alder and T.E. Wainwright, “Molecular
3776 (1991).
dynamics by electronic computers,” In International
Symposium on Statistical Mechanical Theory of 38. H. Chen, S. Chen, W. Matthaeus, “Recovery of the
Transport Processes, Brussels, 1956; Prigogine, I., Navier - Stokes equations using a lattice-gas
Ed.; Interscience: New York, 1958. Boltzmann method,” Phys. Rev. A, 45, R5339
(1992).
26. C. Moon, P.C. Taylor, P.M. Rodger, “Molecular
dynamics study of gas hydrate formation,” J. Am. 39. Y. Qian, D. d'Humieres, P. Lallemand, “Lattice
Chem. Soc., 125, 4706-4707, 2003. BGK models for Navier-Stokes equation,”
Europhys. Lett., 17, 479 (1992)
27. T.F. Headen, E.S. Boek, G. Jackson, T.S. Totton,
E.A. Müller, “Simulation of asphaltene aggregation 40. H. Chen, “Volumetric formulation of the lattice
through molecular dynamics: Insights and Boltzmann method for fluid dynamics: Basic
limitations” Energy Fuels, 31, 1108-1125, 2017. concept,” Phys. Rev. E, 58, 3955(1998)
28. A. Kate, K.K. Sahu, J. Pandey, M. Mishra, P.K. 41. H. Otomo, H. Fan, R. Hazlett, Y. Li, I. Staroselsky,
Sharma, “Green catalysis for chemical R. Zhang, R., and H. Chen, H., “Simulation of
transformation: The need for the sustainable residual oil displacement in a sinusoidal channel
development” Curr. Res. Green. Sustain. Chem., 5, with the lattice Boltzmann method,” Comptes
100248, 2022. Rendus Mécanique, 343, 559 (2015).
29. T. Düren, Y.-S. Bae, R.Q. Snurr, “Using molecular 42. G.R. Jerauld, J. Fredrich, N. Lane, Q. Sheng, B.
simulation to characterise metal–organic Crouse, D.M. Freed, A. Fager, and R. Xu,
frameworks for adsorption applications,” Chem. “Validation of a workflow for digitally measuring
Soc. Rev., 38, 1237-1247, 2009. relative permeability,” SPE 188688, SPE Abu Dhabi
The 36th International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts
Int. Pet. Exhib. & Conf., Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., Nov., dynamics simulations,” ChemPhysChem, 9, 994-
2017. 1002, 2008.
43. H. Andrä, N. Combaret, J. Dvorkin, E. Glatt, J. Han, 54. V.V. Murashov, “Reconstruction of pristine and
M. Kabel, Y. Keehm, F. Krzikalla, M. Lee, C. hydrolyzed quartz surfaces,” J. Phys. Chem. B., 109,
Madonna, M. Marsh, T. Mukerji, E. H. Saenger, R. 4144-4151, 2005.
Sain, N. Saxena, S. Ricker, A. Wiegmann, X. Zhan,
“Digital rock physics benchmarks—part II: 55. A. Abramov, A. Keshavarz, S. Iglauer, “Wettability
Computing effective properties,” Comp. Geosci., of fully hydroxylated and alkylated (001) α-quartz
50, 33 (2013) surface in carbon dioxide atmosphere,” J. Phys.
Chem. C, 123, 9027-9040, 2019.
44. J. Wu, J.J. Huang, “Dynamic behaviors of liquid
droplets on a gas diffusion layer surface: 56. L.T. Zhuravlev, “The surface chemistry of
Hybrid lattice Boltzmann investigation,” J. App. amorphous silica. Zhuravlev model,” Colloids Surf.
Phys., 118, 044902 (2015) A, 173, 1-38, 2000.
45. M.A. Safi, N.I. Prasianakis, J. Mantzaras, A. 57. M. Ali, S. Al-Anssari, M. Arif, A., Barifcani, M.
Lamibrac, F.N. Buchi, “Experimental and pore-level Sarmadivaleh, L Stalker, M. Lebedev, S. Iglauer,
numerical investigation of water evaporation in gas “Organic acid concentration thresholds for ageing of
diffusion layers of polymer electrolyte fuel cells,” carbonate minerals: Implications for CO2
Int J Heat and Mass Trans.,115, 238 (2017). trapping/storage,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 534, 88-
94, 2019.
46. L. Martin, P. Benedikt, K. Benjamin, W. Julius, D.
Timo, S. Volker, L. Arnulf, “Understanding 58. R.W. Hockney, J.W. Eastwood, Computer
electrolyte filling of Lithium-ion battery electrodes simulation using particles, IOP Publishing: Bristol
on the pore scale using the Lattice Boltzmann (1988).
Method,” Batteries and Supercaps, e202200090, (to
59. B.Y. Cai, J.T. Yang, T.M. Guo, “Interfacial tension
be published)
of hydrocarbon+ water/brine systems under high
47. D.H. Jeon, “Wettability in electrodes and its impact pressure,” J. Chem. Eng. Data, 41, 493-496 (1996).
on the performance of Lithium-ion batteries,”
60. C.A. Schneider, W.S. Rasband, and K.W. Eliceiri,
Energy Storage Materials, 18, 139 (2019)
“NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis,”
48. X. Shan and H. Chen, “Lattice Boltzmann model for Nature Methods, 9, 671-675, 2012.
simulating flows with multiple phases and
61. W.B. Haines, “Studies in the physical properties of
components,” Phys Rev E, 47, 1815 (1993).
soil : the hysteresis effect in capillary properties and
49. H. Otomo, H. Fan, Y. Li, M. Dressler, I. Staroselsky, the modes of moisture distribution.” J Agric Sci, 20,
R. Zhang, and H. Chen, “Studies of accurate multi- 97 (1930)
component lattice Boltzmann models on benchmark
62. J.G. Roof, “Snap-Off of oil droplets in water-wet
cases required for engineering applications,” Jour.
pores,” SPE J., 10, 85 (1970)
Comp. Sci., 17, 334 (2016).
63. A. Skauge, K. Spildo, L. Høiland, B. Vik, B.
50. H. Otomo, B. Crouse, M. Dressler, D.M. Freed, I.
Ottesen, “ Experimental evidience of different
Staroselsky, R. Zhang, H. Chen, “Multi-component
intermediate wetting states,” SCA 2004-04, Int.
lattice Boltzmann models for accurate simulation of
Symp. Soc. Core Analysts, Abu Dhabi, UAE, (2004).
flows with wide viscosity variation,” Computer
Fluids, 172, 674 (2018)