Controlled Environment Driver Training Guidelines
Controlled Environment Driver Training Guidelines
Guidelines
May 2021
Creative Commons information
© State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) 2015
http://creativecommons.org.licences/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence. You are free to copy, communicate and adapt
the work, as long as you attribute the authors.
The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However,
copyright protects this publication. The State of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made
available online or electronically but only if its recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains
unaltered.
The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural
and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator,
please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 13 14 50 and ask them to telephone
the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads on 13 74 68.
Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no
responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or
implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing.
Introduction 2
Background 2
How can we reduce young driver risk, and what is the role of driver trainers? 3
An overview of the guidelines 4
Further information 55
What research evidence tells us not to do 55
Recommended reading 55
Background
Inexperienced drivers are among the most vulnerable road users in Australia. While the incidence of
crash involvement is relatively low during the learner phase, it is particularly high during the initial six
to twelve months of unsupervised/solo driving, reducing gradually throughout the provisional period,
but taking several years to plateau (see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1 Learner, provisional and open licensed light passenger vehicle drivers involved in casualty crashes,
Queensland, by crash severity, 2015 to 2019 1
In Queensland, young drivers are over-represented in serious road crashes. Between 1 January
2015 and 31 December 2019 there were 316 fatalities and 10,552 hospitalised casualties as a result
of crashes involving young adult drivers/riders (aged 16 to 24 years) within Queensland. This
represents 26.2% of all Queensland road fatalities and 32.1% of hospitalised casualties during this
period.
1 The data in Figure 1 refers to licence duration, not driver age. Whilst many of the drivers represented in this data are
young, it does include drivers of all ages. When describing risk, it is important to consider exposure (for example, the
amount of driving hours or kilometres travelled). Exposure is not part of the data in this chart.
Young people aged 16 to 24 years made up, on average, 13.6% of all Queensland licence holders
between 2015 and 2019.
How can we reduce young driver risk, and what is the role of driver trainers?
A number of initiatives have been introduced in Queensland over the last decade to address the
over-representation of young drivers in casualty crashes, such as the Graduated Licensing System
(GLS), improved driver education programs for learner drivers (PrepL) and their supervisor drivers
(PrepL Supervisor), as well as driver training, both on-road and on-range (i.e., Controlled
Environment Driver Training [CEDT]) courses. The GLS focuses both on the Learner period and
licensed drivers during the Provisional period – it recognises that solo driving is a new experience
and young drivers need to gain on-road experience during this time. It aims to provide driving
exposure in safer environments in the first instance and gradually expose young drivers to other
environments as they gain more experience.
Driver education and training, particularly for learner drivers, are essential components of the suite of
initiatives to improve young driver safety. These programs, when based on scientific evidence, are
important and effective ways to support the 'learning to drive' process, assist in acquiring
fundamentals of driving and facilitate safe driving in the long term.
Evidence suggests that some types and components of CEDT programs show promise. While
teaching vehicle handling skills is important, programs that focus on developing ‘higher-order’
cognitive skills to avoid risks (e.g., hazard perception and response, insight, resilience), rather than a
focus on advanced vehicle control skills, have been shown to be effective.
• Hazard perception training: this aims to improve a driver’s ability to recognise and respond
safely to hazards in the driving environment.
• Insight training: this aims to promote greater understanding of the risks associated with driving
and to increase one’s awareness of their own limitations in driving skill. Through insight
training, learners are encouraged to calibrate their driving behaviour according to the
complexity of traffic situations rather than their own perceived driving ability, which diminishes
the potential for overconfidence.
• Resilience training: this aims to reduce risky driving behaviour in young drivers through a focus
on interpersonal skills and risk awareness and addresses deliberate risk-taking behaviour and
poor choices including drink and drug driving, fatigue and speeding.
In summary, it is important that all programs and initiatives addressing young driver safety, including
driver training and other educational programs, are evidence-based and effective, and that resources
are available to assist driver trainers to develop and deliver training sessions that align with good
practice. This guideline is designed to do just that for CEDT.
• A review of the empirical literature addressing the efficacy of training and education for young
drivers and evidence regarding good practice approaches to increase higher-order cognitive
skills including hazard perception, insight and resilience, as well as vehicle handling skills.
• Consultation with a sample of driver trainers providing CEDT programs to obtain information
on the goals and priorities of CEDT, current delivery approaches and content, and suggested
modifications to the training content or delivery methods (or components of these) to improve
young driver safety.
• An assessment of the risk of adverse CEDT outcomes (e.g., unsafe driving and ineffective
learning) and development of strategies to counter these.
• A workshop with driver trainers to i) obtain feedback on a draft of the CEDT guidelines,
particularly for topics/strategies that have potential to induce unsafe outcomes for young
drivers; and ii) determine the level of detail required in the CEDT guidelines and supporting
materials.
The guidelines are intended as a set of recommendations and are designed to provide useful
information to a broad audience of driver trainers who deliver training targeted at various driver
markets. The level of detail in the guidelines, particularly the provision of details for on-range
activities and exercises (such as where to look, where to position the vehicle, when to brake, how to
control and hold the steering wheel, etc.) are broad, as it is assumed that controlled environment
driver trainers know and practice this level of detail.
• The rationale for including the topic in driver training (primarily based on evidence and driver
trainer consultations).
• The stage of licensing for which the topic is likely to be most effective.
• Guiding principles (what skills need to be addressed) and red flags (potential risks such as
overconfidence or over reliance on vehicle control skills and strategies to manage risks).
• Suggested exercises for implementation and descriptions of the types of supporting resources
that could be used to facilitate training of the topics within the overall guideline (e.g., on-range
props and demonstration where facilities permit, classroom videos, group discussion,
whiteboard drawings etc).
Overview
This guideline discusses how safe driving can be enhanced by applying adult learning principles to
CEDT. This approach to learning includes:
• Respecting students as being capable of contributing to the learning process and encouraging
them to do so
• Providing content and activities that are appropriate for the students' stage of development as
a safe driver
• Helping students understand the immediate personal relevance of CEDT content and activities
• CEDT trainers attempting to understand and flexibly respond to any physical or mental health
challenges of individual students.
Rationale
Research shows that use of adult learning principles in driver training can effectively help
students develop higher-order cognitive skills and promote safe driver behaviour.
Goal
CEDT trainers understand adult learning principles underpinning the guideline in this
publication.
Target Audience
This guideline is applicable to CEDT for all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
While many CEDT students may still be adolescents, they are becoming adults and principles of
adult learning should be employed. This is especially true for effective development of abilities such
as insight and resilience. A Queensland Government publication that addresses this topic in depth is
'Driver education for senior school students (Years 10-12) and young novice drivers', which may be
accessed by clicking on the link 'Literature review and key elements of a best practice program' at
https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/Safety/School-road-safety/Student-driver-education.aspx. Adult learning
principles discussed in this online publication, especially relevant to CEDT, may be found under the
headings:
Adult learning principles should be used during practical driving activities on the range and not be
limited to classroom discussions. Indeed, classroom-based discussions could be viewed by some
students as wasted time when they could be undertaking driving activities. Discussion of important
issues such as hazard perception, insight and resilience should be planned to occur during and in-
between driving activities, as well as the classroom.
Types of exercises that could be used to implement adult learning principles are described
throughout the guideline. Trainers may, of course, use their own exercises; however, they should
ensure these adhere to the guiding adult learning principles.
• A relaxed and informal manner of speech that that invites students to contribute their
knowledge and experiences through questions
• Use of open questions that invite analysis and opinion (e.g. Why…? How…? What is…?)
This delivery style often involves asking students to draw on their own experiences as drivers or
passengers and to share these experiences with the group. In some cases, this may raise discussion
2Sourced from: Adult learning theory - Occupational Therapy Practice Education Collaborative - Queensland - University
of Queensland (uq.edu.au)
Trainers should reassure students that they do not have to talk about any issues which they feel may
be distressing. Trainers should also ask students to let them know if any issues raised in discussion
are distressing for them. At this point, discussion of the issue/s can be terminated and/or the student
can be asked if they would like to take a short break.
Finally, the delivery style should avoid treating any driving activity as a game or challenge. There is a
risk that such an approach could lead to students practising the activity when not under the care of a
qualified driving trainer and becoming overconfident. To counter this, trainers should elicit student
acknowledgement that performing these activities on public roads and without the supervision of a
qualified driving trainer is dangerous.
• Pre-learner permit: CEDT content should include general awareness of road safety for all
road users. Activities could include discussing student experience of road safety as a
pedestrian and cyclist, extending this to the perspective of car drivers, and concluding with the
need for shared responsibility for road safety by all road users. Activities may include
prompting and reinforcing discussion through demonstrations of driving by a trainer, but not by
students. Student driving at this stage is not needed by participants and could promote a
sense of thrill seeking which would be counterproductive.
• Early learner permit holders: CEDT content should address basic vehicle control in simple
road environments. Activities could include demonstrations and practise of starting the car,
lookout, indicating, moving off gently, braking, making smooth turns, complying with road
signage, and stopping. Experience with simple traffic contexts may be appropriate after
competent control of the car has been demonstrated. Discussion may include the need to
maintain attention to the driving task, including types of hazards on the road and the need to
slow and keep a safe distance from them.
• Experienced learner permit holders: As learner drivers gain experience, CEDT content may
be extended to more complex driving contexts, including busy traffic, driving at higher speeds,
poor weather and visibility, and driving at night. These contexts may not be practicable to
contrive in a controlled environment and activities may be largely discussion-based.
Discussions may also extend to the student taking full responsibility for the driving task,
including dealing with distractions, such as noisy passengers, planning drives to avoid
hazards, such as poor road conditions, and deciding when driving should be avoided or
postponed for safety reasons. Concepts of insight and resilience, as discussed in this
publication, are especially relevant to this stage. Student driving activities may include tasks
that demonstrate the limits of safely stopping a car at range speeds and the inability to safely
manoeuvre; it is critical that these activities do not build overconfidence or be seen as a game
through repeated attempts.
• Experienced open licence holders: In principle, CEDT for experienced licence holders
should continue to reinforce principles of safe driving, but flexibility is required to meet student
expectations and needs. In particular, that principles of safe driving presented in this
publication do not extend to racetrack driving or other forms of thrill seeking. There is ample
research evidence to show that 'advanced' driver training leads to overconfidence on the roads
and higher crash rates. An appropriate form of CEDT for experienced licence holders would be
to apply safe driving principles to difficult and complex contexts that they are faced with during
essential business or private travel. Driver trainers are encouraged to apply the advice in this
publication to these contexts when planning these courses.
Overview
This guideline discusses how driving safely is enhanced through:
Rationale
An understanding of road rules is required to ensure order on roads and in traffic.
Goal
Students understand the road rules.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
Explain the importance of consistent application of road rules for maintaining order and safety on
roads and in traffic.
Emphasise the importance of maintaining knowledge of the road rules and putting this into practice
when driving. Point out this will help young drivers to avoid developing bad habits.
Use the list of Queensland Road Rules described in TMR’s PrepL Supervisor Course 3 for a detailed
description of road rules and illustrative examples:
3See: How to enrol in the PrepL Supervisor Course | Transport and motoring | Queensland Government
(www.qld.gov.au)
• Giving way
• Parking
• Hazardous Situations
• Road markings.
The emphasis should be on revision and consolidation as students will have passed the written road
rules test or the equivalent, ‘PrepL’.
Exercise 1
Use the diagrams and explanations of road rules as set out in PrepL Supervisor. After explaining
each set of road rules, students are quizzed on their knowledge using the questions provided in
PrepL Supervisor.
Exercise 2
Most training facilities will not be able to cater for demonstrations of all road rules. However, where
facilities permit, on-range demonstrations could be used for selected road rules such as giving way or
stopping at intersections or roundabouts. Trainers could also combine this with Exercise 1. A
suggested approach is for the trainer to demonstrate how to follow selected road rules and then for
students to practise these on the range.
Rationale
Being aware of the potential consequences of breaking the road rules encourages
compliance with road rules to promote safety.
Goal
Students are aware of the potential consequences of breaking the road rules.
Target audience
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
Ensure that students are aware of all potential consequences of breaking the road rules including:
• Financial impact
• Emotional trauma
• Loss of independence
Exercise
Encourage discussion in the classroom or on the range of the potential consequences of breaking
road rules by asking the following questions:
Overview
This guideline discusses how driving safety is enhanced through:
This guideline begins by providing an overview of the Safe System approach to road safety. The Safe
System provides an overall framework for young driver learning and is central to Queensland’s road
safety strategy.
Following this, the focus is on ways to prepare for safe driving before getting into the car. Young
drivers are encouraged to drive the safest vehicle they can afford, and to ensure their vehicle is
legally compliant and in good driving condition before each trip. They are then prompted to think
about their own fitness to drive and to plan for factors that may affect them including fatigue and time
of day, mood and health, weather conditions and other passengers.
Rationale
Understanding the safe system road safety philosophy may encourage greater
responsibility for road safety and promote other factors that improve road safety (by using
safer vehicles and driving on safer roads).
Goal
Student understands how the safe system works, particularly in terms of their own
responsibility for maintaining safety.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic:
The Safe System approach to road safety marks a shift from a sole focus on crash reduction to the
elimination of death and serious injury. It is designed to make allowance for the following factors:
• Our body is not designed to survive in a high impact crash without being killed or seriously
injured.
The Safe System approach attempts to mitigate the consequences of people’s mistakes through the
design of safer roads and roadsides, safer vehicles, safer speeds and the behaviour of safer people.
• Each of the four pillars of the Safe System work together to provide a safer environment,
which avoids death and serious injury outcomes for simply making a mistake:
o Safer roads and roadsides – designed to be safer through improved road surfaces,
removal of roadside hazards and installation of safety barriers
o Safer vehicles – designed to be safer through production of safer vehicles equipped with
the latest safety features, including electronic stability control, front and side curtain
airbags and head restraints, collision avoidance systems and better maintenance of tyres
and brakes
o Safer speeds - speed will be managed to safe levels through more appropriate speed
limits. Roads will also be designed in ways that help people know what the speed limit is
without having to look at speed limit signs and help them choose a safe travel speed.
E.g., higher speed zones might have wide roads, whereas lower speed zones might have
narrow roads.
o Safer people - road users will be alert and compliant with road rules and drive to the
conditions.
• Safety is maximised when all four pillars of the Safe System work together.
• But first and foremost, all road users need to be responsible by behaving as safely as possible
on the road
o The system is designed to help prevent death and injury to road users as much as
possible if they make a mistake that results in a crash.
o However, it is unlikely to prevent death or injury for some crashes that arise from
deliberate risk taking such as drink/drug driving or speeding. As such, road users still
need to be alert and compliant and take responsibility for using the road system safely.
o Road users who are not alert and compliant and do not take responsibility for using the
road system safely will face consequences including fines, accumulation of demerit
points leading to loss of licence, or ultimately loss of their own, or someone else’s, health
or life.
Exercise
Emphasise the point that human bodies are unable to withstand crash forces without being killed or
seriously injured.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ2tsE_0Mlk
Rationale
Research shows that driving safer vehicles equipped with the latest safety features
reduces crash involvement and the severity of injury in the event of a crash. This is
particularly important for young drivers who have a higher crash risk than other drivers.
Goal
Students understand how safe vehicles and vehicle safety features can reduce crash
and injury risk.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
Primary safety features are designed to help a driver avoid having a crash. Examples of primary
safety features include:
• Anti-lock brakes
• Traction control
Secondary safety features are designed to prevent, or lessen the severity of, injuries to vehicle
occupants in the event of a crash. Examples of secondary safety features include:
• Airbags
Secondary safety features also include structural aspects associated with the vehicle body itself
including its weight, size and the strength of the materials from which it is made.
Newer vehicles typically provide more protection for occupants in a crash as they are made from high
strength materials and have better impact crumple zones to absorb energy.
Vehicles equipped with the latest primary and secondary safety features are typically referred to as
safer vehicles as they offer more protection to their occupants than vehicles with older or no primary
or secondary safety features.
Do safer vehicles and vehicle safety features reduce crash and injury risk?
The following evidence explains why purchasing vehicles equipped with the latest safety features is
important for young drivers and can reduce their crash or injury risk:
• Statistics show that vehicles more than 10 years old are over-represented in fatal crashes4.
• An analysis of over 1.5 million injured road users in New Zealand and Australia found that
drivers of the worst vehicles rated for safety are 10 times more likely to be killed or seriously
injured than a driver in the safest vehicle1.
• Advances in primary and secondary vehicle safety features have contributed to a significant
decline in deaths and injuries worldwide.
• However, the first car a young driver owns or uses is commonly the least safe. This is often
due to the car being a ‘hand me-down’ from a well-meaning family member, a birthday
present, a share car with their siblings, or bought by a learner themselves 5.
• Many young drivers and their parents are unlikely to have considered safety when purchasing
a car. Features such as price, colour and preferred model are weighted more heavily in the
purchase decision2.
• The evidence shows that using the safest vehicle possible will provide better protection to
drivers, especially young drivers who are more likely to crash 6. This is why it is recommended
that young drivers purchase the safest vehicle they can afford.
4Newstead, S., Watson, L., Keall, M. & Cameron, M. (2017). Vehicle safety ratings estimated from police-reported crash data: 2017
update. Australian and New Zealand crashes during 1987-2015. Report No. 330. Melbourne: Monash University Accident Research
Centre.
5Collins, S., Alexander, K., Waller, E., Cockfield, S., Harris, A. & McIntyre, A. (2013). Targeting parents to influence the safety of their
young drivers: Exploratory research informing a parent communication strategy. Proceedings of the 2013 Australasian Road Safety
Research, Policing & Education Conference. 28th – 30th August, Brisbane, Queensland.
6 Whelan, M., Scully, J. & Newstead, S. (2009). Vehicle safety and young drivers. Stages 2 & 3. Analysis of young driver crash types
and vehicle optimisation. Report No. 292. Melbourne. Monash University Accident Research Centre.
Newly licensed drivers should be assured that safety doesn't need to be unaffordable and that they
should purchase the safest vehicle they can afford. In fact, most cars in Australia since 2011 and
2012 have excellent occupant protection following their initial five-star crash test rating when new 7.
These cars are now relatively affordable used cars and would make a sensible choice for young
drivers if they cannot afford a newer vehicle.
Red flags
Trainers should note that discussion of the safety benefits of high ANCAP ratings may cause some
students to think they can take more risks because there is less chance of injury.
To counter this, trainers should emphasise that crashes in vehicles with high safety ratings can still
cause severe injury or death of a driver and other road users, such as pedestrians, cyclists and
motorcyclists. Consequently, safe driving practices are essential in all vehicles, regardless of the
safety rating.
To illustrate this point, trainers could use the following points for discussion:
• Safe vehicles and vehicle safety features work to i) avoid crashes or ii) avoid or minimise the
effects of a crash.
• However, in many situations even the safest vehicles and vehicle safety features will not avoid
a crash or minimise the severity of injuries that may occur in the event of a crash
o The safest vehicle on the road today provides crash protection up to 70km/h for car
occupants wearing seat belts in frontal impacts and 50 km/h in side impacts with another
vehicle. Car occupants are unlikely to escape serious injury or death if their vehicle
collides with a tree or other fixed object at a speed above 30 km/h.
o The human tolerance to injury of a pedestrian hit by even the safest car will be exceeded
if the vehicle is travelling at over 30km/h.
• These situations can be generally avoided by being proactive and driving safely at all times
including driving at a safe speed, maintaining a safe distance from other vehicles, and
continuously scanning for hazards.
To counter this, trainers using vehicles with low safety ratings as part of CEDT should emphasise that
students should not drive such vehicles on the road. This is because newly licensed drivers will be
unsupervised and will not be in a controlled and safe driving environment like on the CEDT range.
Therefore, selecting a vehicle with the highest affordable safety ratings is very important.
Exercise 1
Play the video created by the Australian New Car Assessment Program which compares the safety
performance of an old and new vehicle in a crash: https://www.ancap.com.au/WhoSurvives
In this video, the driver of a 1998 Toyota Corolla collides with a driver of a 2015 Toyota corolla. The
older Corolla had no safety features and its structure was not designed to protect from injury in a
crash. Its driver is unlikely to survive the crash and has an extremely high risk of sustaining serious
head, chest and leg injury. In contrast, the newer Corolla had dual frontal airbags, side chest-
protecting and side head-protecting airbags and a driver knee airbag. Seat belt pre-tensioners were
also fitted to the front seats, as was ABS and ESC. The structure of the 2015 model was also far
superior to that of the 1998 vehicle and purposely designed to protect vehicle occupants in a crash.
Exercise 2
A video or on-range demonstration could be used to show students what to do if one or more safety
features such as ABS or ESC is activated in a modern vehicle.
If an on-range demonstration is used, trainers should reiterate the message that in many situations
even the safest vehicles and vehicle safety features will not prevent a crash or reduce the severity of
injuries in the event of a crash. The best protection is to drive at safe speeds, maintain a safe
distance from other vehicles and continuously scan for hazards.
Exercise 3
To illustrate the point that even the safest vehicles and vehicle safety features will not prevent injury
in all situations, present a picture showing a modern vehicle heavily damaged and wedged between
two large trucks.
Explain that the cause of the crash was due to the driver’s failure to use their mirrors when merging
on a freeway.
Ask students to consider whether any of the vehicle’s safety features could have protected the driver
in this situation.
Point out that the cheapest safety device in the vehicle that could have saved the driver’s life was the
one they did not use – the mirror.
Conclude by emphasising the importance of being proactive and using low risk driving strategies to
avoid having to rely on safety features in the first place.
Rationale
Correct display of L or P plates (where applicable) and registration plates is a requirement
for legal compliance and safety.
Goal
Students understand i) how to ensure their vehicle is legally compliant; ii) how to maintain
their vehicle safely and iii) the importance of regular vehicle servicing by a qualified
mechanic.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
Correct display of L or P plates (where applicable) and registration plates is a requirement for legal
compliance and safety.
While mechanical problems contribute to only a small proportion of all crashes, there is generally little
a driver can do to avoid crashes stemming from mechanical issues once they are on the road.
However, it is possible to avoid crashes associated with mechanical defects by performing regular
vehicle checks and having your vehicle serviced regularly by a qualified mechanic.
Regular checks
Students should ensure their L or P plates are clearly displayed on the front and rear windows where
applicable and their registration plates are legible. Trainers should point out that this is a requirement
for legal compliance and safety and will help students avoid fines and accumulation of demerit points.
The working condition of the vehicle should also be checked regularly (about monthly), ensuring the
Owner’s Manual is consulted for more information where required. It is recommended that the
following vehicle components are checked:
• Check the low and high beam headlights, indicators, brake and reverse lights are working.
• Ensure the engine oil level does not fall below ‘min’ or ‘add’ level as indicated at the bottom of
the dipstick.
• Check the windscreen wipers are working and the windscreen is clean and not cracked.
• Ensure there is at least 1.5mm of tread on the tyres. If the tread wear indicator is exposed, the
tyre is not legal.
• Ensure all tyres are sufficiently inflated, including the spare tyre.
There are some things that must be checked by a qualified mechanic. Regular vehicle servicing is
recommended and will ensure your vehicle is operating safely.
To avoid potential unsafe consequences of mechanical failures on the road, it is recommended that
drivers invest in a roadside assistance policy.
Exercise 1
An on-range demonstration is given in which students are shown all or some components of
performing ‘regular checks’ on a vehicle. Students then practise performing all or some of these
checks.
Exercise 2
Students are shown a short video of how to perform a pre-vehicle safety check.
https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/licensing/getting/education/videos
Rationale
Planning for trips can help young drivers identify risks to safety and avoid common young
driver crashes.
Goal
Students understand how to plan safer trips to reduce their exposure to high risk situations.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
As a result of their inexperience, young drivers are more likely than others to crash when driving in
high risk situations.
Graduated driver licensing restrictions are in place to reduce exposure to high-risk situations
including driving with multiple peer passengers, driving at night, driving while using a mobile phone,
and driving under the influence of alcohol.
However, it is not possible to protect drivers from all high-risk situations such as driving in poor
weather conditions, driving in unfamiliar situations or driving when tired, angry or upset. In addition,
young drivers may still violate their licensing restrictions (deliberately or unintentionally) even though
breaking these restrictions is against the law.
Exercise
Ask students to identify the questions they might ask themselves before taking a trip and the
decisions they might have to make. For all situations, students should ask themselves whether they
should be driving right now. Trips should be postponed if:
• The only available driver is impaired by alcohol or drugs (or potentially has alcohol or drugs in
their system)
To avoid fatigue and impairment affecting driving, drivers should plan their trips well in advance and
not leave planning to the day of the trip. This includes ensuring trips are not planned to occur the
night after parties where drivers know they are likely to have had little or no sleep or alcohol/drugs in
their system.
For all other situations, students should consider implementing strategies (suggested below) to
ensure their current well-being or factors in the external environment do not affect their ability to drive
safety.
Trainers should ask the following questions for each risk. Refer also to Guideline 4 (Driving
behaviours – Causes and consequences of young driver crashes) to outline key statistics highlighting
the dangers associated with fatigue, mood/health and passengers when driving.
• How am I feeling? Am I angry or upset? If so, is my mood likely to affect my driving (e.g., will I
be tempted to exceed the speed limit, ignore the road rules, drive erratically?). Tips to improve
concentration and avoid thinking about other distractions that may impact safe driving include:
o Never drive if you are impaired by alcohol or drugs or could potentially have alcohol or
drugs in your system.
Weather conditions
• Is visibility OK?
• Should I be driving right now? Tips to reduce the risk of bad weather or driving conditions
include:
o Slowing down
o Driving to the conditions by increasing your following distance and the space around your
vehicle.
o If conditions become increasingly difficult, pull over where and when safe to do so and
wait for conditions to improve.
Passengers
• When was the last time my car was serviced by a qualified mechanic?
o Oil
o Tyres
o Fuel
o Lights and brakes?
• Tips to reduce risk include:
Overview
This guideline discusses how driving safety is enhanced through strategies for safe driving behaviour.
It addresses the topic of resilience training through a focus on interpersonal skills and risk
awareness. The following topics are discussed:
First, statistics showing the higher crash involvement of young drivers are used to demonstrate the
importance of this group as a target group for driver training and education. The key question
addressed here is ‘What’s the problem?”
The next topic examines the causes and consequences of young driver crashes. Students draw on
their own driving experiences to discuss the main contributors to their high crash risk – inexperience
and risk taking – and think about whether unsafe driving is worth the consequences if a crash were to
occur. The key question addressed here is ‘Why is it happening?’
Next, students think about the triggers for unsafe driver behaviour, including their own feelings and
the behaviour of others. This helps them recognise when they might need to implement a strategy to
reduce or eliminate the risk. The key question being addressed here is ‘How can we identify triggers
to the problem?’
Finally, students identify and discuss strategies for promoting safe behaviours that will help to reduce
their crash risk. The key question being addressed here is ‘What can we do about it?’
Rationale
Young drivers are over-represented in crashes (all severities) and are more likely to be
involved in a crash than any other age group. Statistics showing the higher crash
involvement of young drivers provide evidence that they are an important target for
driver training and education to reduce their crash involvement.
Goal
Students understand that young drivers are more likely to be involved in crashes (all
severities) than any other age group. They recognise that young drivers are an
important target group for driver training and education to reduce their crash
involvement.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students on their learner or provisional licence.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
The learner driver period is the safest period for driving. Provisional drivers (P1 stage) have the
highest incidence of crashing in the first six months of holding their licence - in fact, P1 drivers are
almost ten times more likely to have a casualty crash than Learner drivers 8. Even though the rate of
crash involvement in the P2 phase diminishes, it is still significantly higher than for drivers with an
open licence 9.
Exercise
Trainers should ask students the following questions:
• Why do you think there has been so much attention devoted to young drivers’ safety?
8 TMR Department of Transport and Main Roads QLD, Data Analysis Unit. Unpublished. Statement provided 23 April
2021.
9 TMR Department of Transport and Main Roads QLD, Data Analysis Unit. Unpublished. Statement provided 23 April
2021.
• More importantly, what are your thoughts about young drivers’ safety?
Trainers should present the following graph of Queensland young driver crash involvement by licence
type. Alternatively, they could draw a sketch of the graph on a whiteboard or similar.
Figure 2 Learner, provisional and open licensed light passenger vehicle drivers involved in casualty crashes,
Queensland, by crash severity, 2015 to 2019 10
Trainers should ask students to point out what the graph shows (large spike in crashes from Learner
to P1 – from supervised to unsupervised driving) noting the following points, if these are not raised
during discussion:
• Provisional drivers (P1 stage) have the highest incidence of crashing in the first six months of
holding their licence - in fact, P1 drivers are almost ten times more likely to have a casualty
crash than Learner drivers 11.
10The data in Figure 2 refers to licence duration, not driver age. Whilst many of the drivers represented in this data are
young, it does include drivers of all ages. When describing risk, it is important to consider exposure (for example, the
amount of driving hours or kilometres travelled). Exposure is not part of the data in this chart.
11 TMR Department of Transport and Main Roads QLD, Data Analysis Unit. Unpublished. Statement provided 23 April
2021.
• The learner driver period is the safest period for driving. That’s why gaining at least 100 hours
of on-road driving experience during the learner period is required for promoting safety during
the P1 and 2 phases.
Rationale
Inexperience and risk-taking behaviour including, speed, distraction, non-use of
restraints and impairment due to fatigue, drugs and alcohol are the main factors
contributing to young drivers’ high crash risk.
Young drivers often do not perceive unsafe driving behaviours as increasing their crash
risk. This is partly due to their inexperience: they tend to overestimate their ability to
handle unsafe driving behaviours because they think they are a better driver than they
really are.
Some young people also believe that there are benefits to risky behaviour (such as
impressing peers or getting to a destination faster) and that these benefits outweigh the
costs of driving safely. This is deliberate risk-taking behaviour and stems from a
youthful desire to challenge expectations, push limits and experience freedom.
If young drivers know the causes of their crash involvement and can understand how
any perceived benefits of unsafe driving are unlikely to outweigh the costs, then they
may take greater caution in, or reduce their exposure to, situations that increase their
crash risk.
Goal
Students understand that inexperience and risk-taking behaviour, including speed,
distraction, non-use of restraints and impairment due to fatigue, drugs and alcohol are
the main factors contributing to young drivers’ high crash risk.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing, although it is most relevant
to students that hold, or are about to obtain, their Provisional 1 licence.
12 TMR Department of Transport and Main Roads QLD, Data Analysis Unit. Unpublished. Statement provided 23 April
2021.
One of the main factors in young driver crashes is inexperience. Inexperience can lead to actions by
young drivers which increase their risk of crash involvement. Some of these actions include:
• Choosing gaps that are too small when making turns, crossing intersections or overtaking.
Inexperience can be addressed by gaining as much on-road driving experience as possible during
the learner period. At least 100 hours of on-road driving experience is required for learner drivers in
Queensland.
Dangerous risk-taking behaviour (often provoked by peer pressure) is another common contributor to
young driver crashes, particularly amongst young male drivers with other male peer passengers. In
young people, risk taking usually involves trying to meet challenges including extending skills and
capabilities, pushing limits (i.e., seeing 'how far they can go') and developing self-worth and
acceptance.
Research shows that the main behavioural factors in young driver fatal and serious injury crashes
are:
• Speed
13 TMR Department of Transport and Main Roads QLD, Data Analysis Unit. Unpublished. Statement provided 23 April
2021.
14Glendon, I. (2013). Influences on young drivers’ reported driving behaviours and perceptions: A focus group study.
Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety, 24:16-29.
15 Curry, A.E., Hafetz, L., Kallan, M.J., Winston, F.K., & Durbin, D.R. (2011). Prevalence of teen driver errors leading to
serious motor vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43: 1285–1290.
16 TMR Department of Transport and Main Roads QLD, Data Analysis Unit. Unpublished. Statement provided 23 April
2021.
o A person using a hand-held or handsfree mobile phone while driving is four times more
likely to have a serious crash resulting in hospital attendance 19.
o As a result of the high crash risks associated with using a mobile phone, learner and P1
drivers aged under 25 years are not allowed to use a phone in any way while driving
unless they are legally and safely parked. This includes using hands-free or Bluetooth
accessories. Passengers are not allowed to use the loudspeaker function on their mobile
phones either.
o These restrictions are in place because young drivers are still developing their hazard
perception skills and need to pay full attention to driving.
o For all drivers, especially young drivers, using a mobile phone while driving increases
crash risk as a result of the following factors:
Failing to scan for and recognise hazards
Failing to respond to hazards in time
Drifting out of lanes
Poor steering
Driving erratically or too slowly.
• Driving at night
17Williamson, A. M. & Feyer, A. M. (2000). Moderate sleep deprivation produces impairments in cognitive and motor
performance equivalent to legally prescribed levels of alcohol intoxication. Occupational and Environmental Medicine
57(10): 649-655.
18 Horne, J. A. & Reyner, L.A. (1995). Sleep related vehicle accidents. BMJ 310(6979): 565-567.
McEvoy, S., Stevenson, M., McCartt, A., Woodward, M., Haworth, C., Palamara, P. & Cercarelli, R. (2005). Role of
19
mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. BMJ 331: 428-30.
o Inexperienced young drivers with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05 g/dl have 2.5
times the risk of a crash compared with more experienced drivers 20.
o As a result of the high crash risks associated with driving under the influence of alcohol,
young drivers on their learner and provisional licence are restricted to a zero-blood
alcohol concentration (BAC).
o Many people assume that drivers are not impaired if they have a BAC below the legal
level. However, drivers with a BAC between 0.02 and 0.05 are twice as likely to have a
crash as drivers with a zero BAC21, 22.
o Legal prescription, over-the-counter medications and illegal drugs can affect your ability
to drive safely. Drug driving is dangerous. Drugs can affect your judgement, vision,
coordination and reflexes – all of which increase your risk of having a crash. As a result
of the high crash risks associated with driving under the influence of drugs, all drivers,
including young drivers, are not allowed to drive under the influence of illegal or
prescription drugs.
o The presence of peer aged passengers (16-21 years) increases the risk of fatal crash
involvement for P1 drivers by four times compared to when travelling alone 23.
o As a result of the high crash risks associated with carriage of peer passengers, P1
licence holders under 25 years of age can only carry one passenger aged under 21
years between 11pm and 5am.
20 Peden, M., Scurfield, R., Sleet, D., Mohan, D., Hyder, A., Jarawan, E. & Mathers, C. (2004). World report on road traffic
injury prevention. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO).
Zador, P.L., et al. (2000). Alcohol-Related Relative Risk of Driver Fatalities and Driver Involvement in Fatal Crashes in
22
Relation to Driver Age and Gender: An Update Using 1996 Data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(3).
23 Senserrick, T. & Williams, A.F (2015). Summary of literature of the effective components of graduated driver licensing
o Analysis of Queensland crash data from 2015 to 2019 shows unrestrained vehicle
occupant casualties were almost 10 times more likely to be a fatality compared with
restrained vehicle occupant casualties24.
o While most drivers wear their seat belt most of the time, young people frequently like to
travel together. Sometimes that means there are more people than there are seatbelts in
the car. You should never put more people in the car than you've got seatbelts for.
o All drivers are legally required to wear a seat belt and to ensure that all occupants in their
vehicle are using a seatbelt or approved restraint.
Exercise
Students are encouraged to think about behaviours that they have engaged in as drivers or
passengers which may increase their crash risk and to consider the potential consequences. They
should consider whether there are any benefits of engaging in unsafe behaviours and if these are
more important than safe driving, especially if a crash were to occur.
Trainers should refer to the causes of young driver crashes under ‘Guiding principles’ and use this
information to emphasise relevant points raised by students during discussion. Trainers should ask
the following questions:
• Does anyone have a story they’d like to share in which a risky driving behaviour could have
resulted in a crash or another negative outcome?
o What are the potential consequences of engaging in these behaviours while driving?
• Are there any benefits to engaging in risky behaviours (such as impressing friends or getting to
your destination more quickly)?
24 TMR Department of Transport and Main Roads QLD, Data Analysis Unit. Unpublished. Statement provided 23 April
2021.
o Young drivers often do not recognise behaviours that they or other young drivers engage
in as being risky. This is partly due to their tendency to underestimate risk and
overestimate their own driving abilities. By recognising these behaviours, young drivers
can manage them better.
o Sometimes young drivers are aware that unsafe driving behaviours are risky. However,
they engage in them anyway because they believe the benefits outweigh the costs of
driving safely. Ask drivers to consider if showing off to friends or getting to a destination
thirty seconds faster is really worth the risk.
Rationale
Risky driving behaviour can be motivated by internal and external factors. Internal
factors include personal feelings experienced by the driver such as anger, excitement
or sadness. External factors include activities going on outside the driver such as
weather conditions and the behaviour of passengers. If young drivers understand the
internal and external triggers for their own unsafe driving behaviour, then they may
proactively adopt safer driving behaviours.
Goal
Students can identify internal and external triggers for their own and others’ unsafe
driving behaviour and understand how these triggers increase crash risk.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
Point out that risky driving behaviour can be motivated by internal and external factors. Internal
factors include how you are feeling, e.g.:
• Weather conditions
• Time of day
• Traffic conditions.
Exercise 1 – (Part 1)
This exercise encourages students to think about the influence of different internal and external
factors while driving.
This exercise requires access to a short video highlighting the potential conflict between safe driving
and expressing the excitement and freedom of independent driving. Such a video would depict young
drivers in a car with peer passengers enjoying themselves and engaging in distracting activities such
as using the radio, talking on the phone, leaning over the driver etc. The video would also show
instances of the driver being distracted by these activities and displaying unsafe behaviour such as
speeding, not noticing hazards or breaking other road rules.
Trainers with access to a video such as this should play it to students and then ask the following
questions at the end of the video:
• What do you think the driver was feeling (internal influences)? (e.g., happy, confident etc)
• What external influences did the driver have to manage? (i.e., were there any distractions
inside the car such as passengers, the radio etc, or outside the car such as other drivers,
hazards, traffic etc)
• How did the driver’s internal and external influences affect his/her driving? (Were they
distracted, speeding, breaking any road rules, scanning and recognising hazards? etc).
Where access to a video depicting the above influences is not available, trainers could use students’
accounts of their own driving experiences (e.g., a time when they first drove with passengers in the
car, or were on their way to a party or going on an exciting trip) and ask the same questions as those
above to prompt discussion.
Exercise 2 – (Part 1)
Ask students to think about their own driving experiences and then describe all the influences they
see as being under their control while driving. Trainers should also ask students to indicate whether
these influences would be considered internal or external and label them as such.
Create a list of these influences on the left-hand side of a whiteboard or similar, labelled ‘Under my
control’.
Ask students to describe all the influences they see as being outside of their control while driving.
Trainers should also ask students to indicate whether these influences would be considered internal
or external and label them as such.
Create a separate list of these influences on the right-hand side of the whiteboard or similar, labelled
‘Outside my control’.
Rationale
If students understand strategies to manage internal and external influences on their
behaviour, they may be more likely to implement these strategies to promote safe
driving behaviour.
Goal
Students understand and practice strategies to manage internal and external
influences on their behaviour to reduce crash risk when driving.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principle to guide implementation of this topic.
Young drivers should be encouraged to develop a risk prevention mindset by identifying risks that
can be brought under their control such as alcohol and drugs; night driving; speeding, fatigue; and
distractions including passengers and mobile phones.
Exercise 1 – (Part 2)
Draw students’ attention back to the video they just saw and ask the following questions:
• The driver was influenced by internal feelings including excitement, and external feelings
including distractions from passengers. These influences may explain why he was
speeding/distracted/missed out on recognising hazards etc. What could be done to help
manage these? (before driving he/she could have considered the influences likely to affect
his/her ability to drive safely. He/she could have been more prepared to manage passenger
influences and any other distractions likely to affect his/her driving).
• What safe driving behaviours or choices did the driver demonstrate? (includes behaviours
such as slowing down when needed, scanning for hazards, asking passengers to be
quiet/ignoring passenger distractions or the mobile phone ringing etc).
• What would you have done differently to the driver to ensure you were driving safely? (e.g.,
put the mobile phone in the glove box or turned it off before driving; asked passengers not to
make too much noise etc).
Exercise 2 – (Part 2)
Draw students’ attention back to the list of factors they described as being outside of their control in
the previous whiteboard exercise –Topic 3, Exercise 2.
For those influences listed on the right-hand side of the whiteboard that students see as being
outside of their control, ask them to consider how they would bring them back under their control.
Circle the behaviours for which students identify strategies for bringing under their control while
driving. Then add each one to the list of influences listed under ‘Under my control’ on the left-hand
side of the whiteboard.
Point out that identifying the internal and external influences on driver behaviour can help with
developing strategies to avoid future unsafe driving behaviour. Possible strategies are listed below
but should only be pointed out by the trainer if they are not identified by students.
• By setting behaviour expectations for your passengers before or during the drive you can
manage their distractions in the car. For example, before driving nominate a passenger to be
the ‘boss of the phones.’ All occupants should hand their phone to the ‘phone boss’ who will
hand them back at the end of the drive. Alternatively, ask all occupants to put their phone in
the glove box.
• If you’re in a hurry and there’s heavy traffic, try not to get angry when you hit the traffic. If you
think this is unavoidable, consider pulling over when safe to do so and take a break until you
feel calmer. If you are feeling angry before you get into the car, consider waiting to drive until
you feel calmer.
• If you’re feeling distracted by something that just happened at work, try to mentally re-focus on
the driving task.
Explain that some external influences, especially peer pressure from friends or passengers, can be
difficult to bring under your control. For example, managing passengers urging you to speed because
you are running late, or managing friends at a party asking for a lift home even though you are really
tired and it would break the passenger restrictions on your licence.
Emphasise that external influences will always be a part of driving. While these influences seem like
they are out of your control, what is under your control is how you plan for and make contingencies
for them to reduce or eliminate risk.
Exercise 3
Students are given the opportunity to practise how they would manage the internal and external
influences that could lead to risky driving behaviour in three common scenarios. They should come
up with some strategies to minimise risk in each situation including what they would say and how
they would say it, drawing on the examples given in Exercise 1 of this guideline.
Speed
You’re driving your partner to an appointment, but the traffic is heavier than usual due to an earlier
crash on the road and now you’re running late. Your partner asks you to speed up a little but you’re
already driving at the posted speed limit.
Peer passengers
It’s after midnight on Saturday night and you’re getting ready to drive home from a party. Three of
your friends are pressuring you to give them a lift home. If it was during the daytime you would do it,
but they’re all pretty drunk and you’re worried about breaking the night-time passenger restrictions for
P1 drivers.
Alcohol
You’ve just finished having a few drinks with friends after work. You’re about to walk to the train
station to go home when one of your friends offers you a lift. You’d like to go with her, especially as
she’s taking other friends' home too, but you know that she’s been drinking and shouldn’t be driving.
Overview
This guideline discusses how driver safety is enhanced through:
Research has shown that deficiencies in higher-order cognitive skills play a key role in young driver
safety25. Higher-order cognitive skills are those that relate to thinking, planning and perception. In
addition to ‘safe driving’ other terms commonly used to describe these skills in driving include
‘fundamental driving’ ‘proactive driving’, ‘reading the road’, ‘developing a mental model’, etc.
Research shows that while drivers learn basic vehicle control skills in the first few months of driving,
they can take a number of years to develop higher-order cognitive skills 26. This is why inexperience is
the main contributor to young drivers’ high crash risk.
Research also shows that supervised on-road driving experience during the learner period can help
young drivers improve their higher-order cognitive skills 27. While not replacing the importance of this,
on-range training is a great start to helping drivers to understand how, why and when to apply higher-
order skills and ultimately improving their safety once they are driving solo.
Topic 1 in this guideline outlines the processes involved in scanning, recognising and responding to
hazards (hazard perception). Hazard perception is one type of higher-order cognitive skill in which
failures have most consistently been associated with crash involvement in young drivers 28.
Adoption of low risk driving strategies which set drivers up to scan, recognise and respond to hazards
safely is addressed in Topic 2.
25 Isler, R.B. Starkey, N.J. Sheppard, P. (2011). Effects of higher-order driving skill training on young, inexperienced
drivers’ on-road driving performance, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1818-1827.
26 Isler, R.B. Starkey, N.J. Sheppard, P. (2011). Effects of higher-order driving skill training on young, inexperienced
drivers’ on-road driving performance, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1818-1827.
27 Isler, R.B. Starkey, N.J. Sheppard, P. (2011). Effects of higher-order driving skill training on young, inexperienced
drivers’ on-road driving performance, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1818-1827.
28 Horswill, M. S., & McKenna, F. P. (2004). Drivers’ hazard perception ability: Situation awareness on the road. In S.
Banbury & S. Tremblay (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory and application (pp. 155–175).
Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Rationale
Research has established a link between deficiencies in hazard perception skill and
increased crash risk in young drivers.
Goal
Students understand the importance of developing hazard perception skills for safe driving
and how to apply them.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic:
Hazard perception is the ability to scan your environment and recognise a hazard before you reach it
so you can respond safely if required. A hazard can be any potential source of danger on or near the
road that could lead to a crash. It can come from any direction. Examples of hazards include a blind
corner, a pedestrian waiting to cross, a car approaching a stop sign on an adjacent street, or poor
driving conditions.
• Scan – Actively scan the road ahead of you for potential hazards
• Recognise – Use your judgement to perceive hazardous situations and recognise when action
is required and when it is not. Recognise the difference between potential hazards and
hazards that require you to respond.
• Respond – Learning to recognise a hazard early allows you to make a well-informed decision
on the safest way to respond.
Young drivers’ hazard perception skills are not as well developed as those of older drivers because
they lack experience. Compared to more experienced drivers, young drivers':
• Think that their driving skills are better than they really are.
The first step to good hazard perception is being able to identify risks by scanning the environment.
Scanning is keeping your eyes moving, checking in one area for a couple of seconds and then
moving your eyes to another area. It is important to look beyond the car in front and scan the entire
road environment. When scanning look:
• In the distance
The next step to developing good hazard perception is to recognise the difference between potential
and actual hazards and to practise pointing these out. Actual hazards are those that require you to
respond such as by braking or changing position on the road (e.g., the car ahead suddenly brakes or
the car in the lane next to you starts to veer into your lane).
Potential hazards are those that do not require a sudden response, but drivers should be prepared to
respond if needed (e.g., a pedestrian is standing on the side of the road and you are slowing in
readiness to brake, in case they start to walk out in front of you). It is also important to understand
that hazards can be seen or unseen. Drivers need to be aware of potential hazards that they cannot
29Borowsky A, Shinar D, Oron-Gilad T. (2010). Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving. Accident Analysis and
Prevention, 42(4), 1240-1249.
The last step to developing hazard perception is to respond safely when required. Safe responding
occurs when a driver has learnt to recognise a hazard early by effectively scanning their environment.
For example, by noticing a vehicle that is slowing down and indicating three or four vehicles ahead,
you can adjust your speed before the vehicle directly in front has even applied their brakes.
On-road driving practice is essential to developing good hazard perception skills. The more you drive,
the more you'll become proficient at scanning, recognising and responding to hazards.
Red flags
Driver trainers should be aware that students may become overconfident through successfully
identifying hazards in a controlled environment.
To counter this, trainers should focus feedback in hazard perception training on discussion of
strategies (to avoid distraction, anticipate hazards, make early safe responses) rather than
right/wrong responses.
Feedback for good performance should reinforce what was done correctly.
Feedback for errors should ask the student to assess what happened, why and how to improve.
Exercise 1
If facilities permit, students drive on the range with the trainer and identify and discuss hazards or
potential hazards set up along a pre-defined route by the trainer (e.g., traffic cones, other vehicles or
pedestrians, gravel, wet surfaces etc). Commentary driving could also be used if there are enough
hazards. A commentary drive is where the driver verbalises hazards as they arise (talks out loud) and
suggests ways to respond safely if required. At the end of the drive, trainers should point out and
discuss any hazards that students missed, why they missed them, and how they could improve their
hazard perception in future drives.
Exercise 2
This exercise could be implemented in the classroom by trainers with access to video footage
depicting hazards along an on-road drive. Commentary driving could also be used.
Students take it in turns to provide commentary of actual and potential hazards they need to look out
for, from the perspective of a driver.
As it may not be practical for all students to commentate the full drive, a suggested approach is for
each student to commentate for 30-60 seconds each. When they are not commentating, students
could write down all the hazards they see throughout the full drive.
At the end of the video, trainers should point out and discuss any hazards that students missed.
Trainers should also refer to ‘Steps involved in scanning, recognising and responding to hazards’
under ‘Guiding principles’ above, so that students can practise the process of scanning, recognising
and thinking about when they would respond to a hazard as they drive on the range or watch the
video.
Rationale
Application of low risk driving strategies can help drivers avoid getting into situations where
an incident or crash is unavoidable. Low risk driving includes good observation, speed
management and road positioning – skills which set drivers up to recognise and respond to
hazards safely.
Goal
Students understand low risk driving strategies and how to apply them.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Guiding principles
Trainers should use the following principles and discussion points to guide implementation of this
topic.
Low risk driving strategies focus on being proactive to avoid getting into situations where an incident
or crash is unavoidable.
A low risk driver has good observation, speed management and road positioning – skills which set
drivers up to recognise and respond to hazards safely.
Driving is never risk free, but drivers should always aim to drive ‘low risk’.
The following are key low risk driving strategies that support hazard recognition and responding.
• Observation (as discussed above in Topic 1). It is not enough to just watch the car in front of
you. Looking more than one vehicle ahead will improve your ability to respond to hazards. Be
prepared to react to things like brake lights or indicators. If the traffic ahead of you is reacting,
you will have time to do so too.
• Speed management
o Position your vehicle to maximise the distance from hazards (referred to as buffering).
For example, moving to the left at the crest of a hill to create space from oncoming
vehicles, or moving away from parked cars to avoid pedestrians and doors opening.
o Ensure you always check your mirrors before making any change to your position or
speed. If changing lanes, always ensure you do the following in sequential order: check
your mirrors, check your blind spot by performing a shoulder check, and then put your
indicator on.
Good observation, speed management and road positioning will help to maintain enough time and
space around your vehicle to respond to hazards and avoid a crash.
Both reaction time and response time determine how much space is needed. Staying one car length
behind the vehicle in front is not enough. Two seconds is typically cited as the minimum time needed
for experienced drivers to react and respond to a hazard under ideal conditions. Inexperienced
drivers should be encouraged to allow longer gaps, with some driver trainers suggesting that up to
five seconds is needed. Gaps longer than two seconds are also needed when visibility is poor; roads
are slippery, or when driving a heavy vehicle or towing a trailer/caravan.
The two (or five) second gap can be used in two situations i) when you are following another vehicle
or ii) when another vehicle is following your vehicle or suddenly pulls out in front of you.
Maintaining a safe following distance is essential to reduce the risk of driving into the rear of a
vehicle. This is because the vehicle in front has the potential to stop very quickly if it collides with
another vehicle or stationary object. Rear end collisions are one of the most common crash types for
all drivers, including young drivers. Indeed, young drivers aged 16-24 years are identified as being at
fault in more rear end crashes leading to an injury and subsequent claim to the Queensland
Compulsory Third Party scheme than any other age group 30.
A safe following distance to the vehicle in front is at least two seconds for experienced drivers and
more (say, about 5 seconds) for inexperienced drivers during ideal conditions.
30 MAIC Motor Accident Insurance Commission. Unpublished. Statement provided 20 April 2021.
• The type of vehicle you’re driving: when driving a heavy vehicle, increase your following
distance to four or more seconds. When driving a vehicle towing a trailer or caravan, your
following distance should be two seconds plus one extra second for each 3 metres of trailer
length.
It is necessary to increase your following distance in these situations as it will take longer for you to
stop if the vehicle in front suddenly stops.
The two second following distance rule can be calculated using the time-lapse method (trainers
should amend the following advice to up to five seconds for inexperienced drivers):
• As the rear of the vehicle in front of you passes an object at the side of the road such as a
power pole, tree or sign, start a two-second count ‘one thousand and one, one thousand and
two.
• If your car passes the object you picked before you finish the two-second count, you are
following too closely. Slow down and repeat the count again until the two-second following
distance is achieved.
Explain that the two (or five) second rule can also be used for situations where there is potential for
something to move into the space around your vehicle; e.g., the car behind yours could be following
too close (tailgating) or a car in an adjacent street could fail to give way and pull out in front of you.
• If a car is following too closely behind you, reduce your speed and pull over to the left when
safe to do so and allow the vehicle to pass.
• If there is potential for a hazard to enter the space in front of your vehicle, reduce your speed
to create a buffer. It is necessary to maintain enough space for all potentially hazardous
situations, including blind corners and crests.
Red flags
Driver trainers should be aware that the focus on a minimum number of seconds following distance
may result in some students thinking this rule is an aim point rather than a minimum to be adjusted
for driving conditions.
To counter this, driver trainers should avoid overly focussing on the two-second following distance
rule. Instead they should emphasise that this rule should be treated as a minimum which needs to be
adjusted for conditions.
Driver trainers should be aware that students may become overconfident through successfully
applying low risk strategies in a controlled environment.
To counter this, trainers should focus feedback in low risk training on discussion of strategies (to
avoid distraction, anticipate hazards, make early safe responses) rather than right/wrong responses.
Feedback for errors should ask the student to assess what happened, why and how to improve.
Exercise
In the classroom, trainers should use a whiteboard or similar to illustrate the theoretical principles of
low risk driving strategies and then demonstrate these on the range. Students should be given
opportunities to practise low risk driving strategies on the range with guidance and feedback from the
trainer.
https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/safety/rules/road/distances#:~:text=In%20most%20cases%2C%20a
%20safe,towing%20a%20trailer%20or%20caravan.
If facilities permit, demonstrate how to calculate a safe following distance on the range and then allow
students to try this for themselves.
Rationale
Young drivers find it difficult to prioritise attention to the primary driving task when dealing with
competing tasks, particularly distractions (e.g., operating radios, coping with distracting
passengers). This is because young drivers tend to underestimate the risks involved in driving
and overestimate their own driving abilities. Sometimes they also perceive that there are
immediate benefits to engaging in distracting tasks such as impressing friends or pushing
limits.
While these behaviours are part of the normal process of maturation, young drivers are still
developing their higher-order cognitive skills, particularly hazard perception, and they have
less ‘spare’ capacity to cope with competing tasks. For these reasons, distraction is more
dangerous for young drivers and plays a bigger role in their crash involvement.
Goal
Students understand the importance of controlling attention to prioritise safe driving tasks.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students at all stages of licensing.
Young drivers find it difficult to prioritise attention to the primary driving task when dealing with
competing tasks, particularly distractions (e.g., operating radios, coping with distracting passengers).
Young drivers are still developing their higher-order cognitive skills, particularly hazard perception.
Higher-order cognitive skills are those that relate to thinking, planning and perception. They are
primarily responsible for keeping drivers safe and can take many years to develop. This explains why
young drivers have less spare attentional capacity to cope with any tasks that compete with driving,
especially distractions.
For these reasons, distraction is more dangerous for young drivers than other drivers and plays a
bigger role in their crash involvement. It is also why young drivers have restrictions on their licence
including mobile phone use, passengers, night-time driving and drink driving. These restrictions are
designed to help young drivers devote all their attention to driving which is necessary to keep them
safe when their skills are still developing.
Exercise 1
Students discuss some common distractions they have encountered while driving. Examples include
mobile phone use, passengers, loud music, feeling angry, or tired.
They then discuss strategies that could be implemented to plan for and manage the different types of
distractions. This exercise could also be combined with Exercise 2, below. Trainers should refer to
Guideline 4, Topic 4 – ‘Strategies to manage unsafe driver behaviour’ which overlaps with this topic.
Exercise 2
If appropriate facilities are available, trainers could create a situation in which students’ capacity to
drive safely is impaired by a secondary non-driving activity such as the trainer asking questions of the
student driver as they attempt to concentrate on driving, listening to a loud radio, etc. This activity
could be simulated (such as in a driving simulator or mock-up vehicle where no real driving occurs) or
implemented on the driving range.
Trainers should be aware that activities in which students are asked to engage in or observe unsafe
behaviour might encourage students to treat driving as a game or challenge where they attempt the
task outside of a controlled environment. To counter this, trainers should elicit student affirmations
that trying these activities on real roads is dangerous. This risk will likely be minimised by i) only
allowing one student in the group to take part in the activity while others observe rather than allowing
all students in the group to take turns and ii) ensuring the person assigned to create distractions is
the trainer rather than the student.
At the conclusion of the drives, students are asked to describe how the distractions affected them.
Trainers point out the errors that drivers made when they were distracted and explain the real-world
Overview
This guideline discusses how driving safety is enhanced through:
• Safe manoeuvring.
Research has shown that vehicle control skills are learnt relatively quickly by most young drivers 31. In
contrast, higher-order cognitive skills take many years to develop and play an important role in the
high crash risk of young drivers 32.
Evidence suggests that young drivers tend to overestimate their own driving abilities as a result of
being overconfident 33. Since young drivers learn vehicle control skills relatively quickly, driver training
programs which place an emphasis on vehicle control skills and overlook higher-order cognitive skills
have been found to compound this problem 34. In some cases, such programs have even led to
increased risk taking on-road and greater involvement in crashes by young drivers35.
In line with the latest research, two key approaches are suggested to prevent the development of
overconfidence and risk taking in young drivers when training vehicle control skills.
First, vehicle control skills training should be couched in terms of its relationship to higher-order
cognitive skills training. The focus is on hazard perception and risk awareness and can be achieved
through trainer feedback.
Second, allowing extensive practise of vehicle control skills on the driving range should be avoided.
Once students have built up enough confidence in their ability, trainers should expose them to
31 Simons-Morton, B. & Ehsani, J. (2016). Learning to drive safely. Reasonable expectations and future directions for the
32 Quimby A. R., G. Maycock, I. D. Carter, R. Dixon and J. G. Wall. (1986). Perceptual abilities of accident involved
drivers. Crowthorne, UK: Transport Research Laboratory: Report No.: TRL Report RR27.
33 De Craen, S, Twisk, D.A.M, Hagenzieker, M.P., Elffers, H., Brookhuis, K.A. Do young novice drivers overestimate their
driving skills more than experienced drivers? Different methods lead to different conclusions. Accident Analysis &
Prevention, 43 (5):1660-5.
34 Gregersen, N. P. (1996). Young drivers’ overestimation of their own skill: An experiment on the relation between
training strategy and skill. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 28, 2, 243-250.
35 McIntyre, A. (2015). The effectiveness of driver training/education as a road safety measure. 2016 edition/update.
Melbourne: RACV.
Rationale
Controlling the car is necessary for safe vehicle operation while at the same time
attending to hazard recognition and responding.
Learning outcome
Students can operate vehicle controls while attending to hazard recognition and
responding.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students on their learner permit.
Rationale
Smooth braking and steering are necessary for driving on roads and in traffic safely.
Learning outcome
Students can brake and steer safely and smoothly.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students on their learner permit or provisional licence.
36 Gregersen, N. P. (1996). Young drivers’ overestimation of their own skill: An experiment on the relation between
training strategy and skill. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 28, 2, 243-250.
Rationale
Safe manoeuvring is necessary for responding to hazards.
Learning outcome
Students can manoeuvre the car to safely respond to hazards and maintain a safe gap
from vehicles and other road users.
Target audience
This topic is applicable to students on their learner permit or provisional licence.
Red flags
Driver trainers should be aware of potential red flags when training vehicle control skills and how to
manage them.
Trainers should note that extensive practice of vehicle control skills may cause some students to
think they have mastered these skills. This may lead to complacency or overconfidence and
increased risk taking after CEDT.
To counter this, trainers should limit the number of repetitions of driving tasks by students (e.g. a
specific braking task) on the range to about three. This recommendation is based on the research
literature and was reported as standard practice in most driver training organisations consulted for
this publication. However, trainers should use discretion for on-range practice and maintain an
appropriate balance between building confidence in students and minimising overconfidence that
could lead them to take risks on road after CEDT.
Driving tasks should encourage student insight that some situations will lead to a crash regardless of
driver skill level. Failure to do so may result in students completing CEDT believing that they can rely
on their driving skills to avoid crashes, leading to overconfidence and increased risk taking.
To reinforce this, trainers should include, for each skillset, at least one trial where a student will not
meet criteria for safe driving (e.g. they will hit a cone or not bring the vehicle to a stop within a
specified distance). It is recommended that this be implemented as the last trial in the set of vehicle
control skills being trained (e.g., stopping at a set point in a braking exercise). Feedback should be
focussed on the need to avoid such situations rather than rely on a skilful response. Do not allow a
student to re-attempt the task, pointing out that there is no opportunity to do so after a real crash.
Trainers should also avoid demonstration and practice of vehicle control skills without discussion of
their limitations and the importance of avoiding reliance on them. Failure to do so may result in
students overly relying on vehicle control skills rather than on higher-order cognitive techniques that
prevent them from getting into crash situations.
To reinforce this, trainers should emphasise the importance of anticipating hazards and acting early
to avoid them when teaching basic vehicle control skills. Focus feedback regarding student control of
the vehicle on safe outcomes (e.g. safe and low-risk control) and avoid terms such as 'skilful'.
Such proactive techniques include those described in Guideline 5 and should be reiterated in
discussions accompanying on-range demonstrations, where applicable:
• Actively scanning for hazards, recognising hazards and knowing when to respond;
• Driving within the speed limit or slower if conditions are not optimal (e.g., rain, fog, slippery
road surface, darkness etc). This will give you time to react and stop for any hazards.
• Maintaining a safe position on the road to maximise the distance from hazards (referred to as
buffering).
• Ensuring a minimum two second following distance behind the vehicle in front.
• Maintaining enough space around your vehicle when a driver is following closely behind you or
in case someone pulls out in front of you.
Some students may aim to achieve the level of skill of trainers (through trainer demonstration) rather
than avoid risky situations. This may lead to overconfidence and increased risk taking after CEDT.
To counter this, trainers should not demonstrate driving activities that are 'high performance' or
inherently unsafe (including skid pan activities or slalom driving). Trainers should especially avoid any
suggestion that advanced skills can make these activities safe.
Exercise 1
Trainers demonstrate the correct approach to operation of vehicle control at low speed including:
safely and smoothly starting and stopping the car, changing gears (if applicable), turning and
cornering, and steering. Students then take turns to practise each of these operations under the
trainer’s supervision.
Exercise 2
After completing Exercise 1, trainers demonstrate the correct approach to safely and smoothly
braking, steering and cornering at higher speeds if facilities permit. Students then take turns to
practise each of these operations under the trainer’s supervision.
Exercise 3
After completing Exercises 1 and 2, trainers demonstrate the correct approach to safely and smoothly
manoeuvring around hazards at low speed if facilities permit. Hazards could include other vehicles,
pedestrians, debris or road surface conditions (real or represented by cones for example). Trainers
should also incorporate training of each of the vehicle operations outlined in Exercises 1-3 and
ensure that this exercise is conducted at low speed to avoid representing a slalom activity. Students
then take turns to practise each of these operations under the trainer’s supervision.
Exercise 4
Trainers explain and then demonstrate the relationship between reaction time, speed and stopping
distance through a braking exercise conducted at 60 km/h and then again at 65 km/h. Students are
asked to drive up to the required speed limit and then brake at the point when the trainer blows a
whistle. Trainers should point out how far the student travelled (i.e., the stopping distance) which is
impacted by both their speed and reaction time (i.e., the time taken to realise that braking is required
plus the time taken to apply the brakes).
Trainers should point out how much of a difference 5 km/h can make to their stopping distance and
ask students to consider the safety implications of this difference when driving on real roads.
Throughout this exercise, trainers should also discuss and demonstrate each of the guiding principles
for low risk driving strategies so that students understand the importance of avoiding situations where
last-minute braking is required. These include a) good observation (where to look and when), b) good
speed management (not speeding and/or making sure travel speed is always appropriate for the
conditions), c) safe road position including using space effectively to buffer away from hazards and d)
maintaining a safe following distance from vehicles ahead.
• An explanation of why controlling the car and braking and steering smoothly are fundamental
to subsequent safe manoeuvring activities.
• A focus on early recognition of, and responding to, hazards when training safe manoeuvring
activities.
Overview
The Department of Transport and Main Roads will separately evaluate the effectiveness of the
guidelines and, while this is not the responsibility of the CEDT provider, respectfully requests that the
following records are kept for each CEDT course conducted:
o pre-learner permit
o early learner permit holder
o experienced learner permit holder
o P1 provisional licence holder
o P2 provisional licence holder
o open licence holder
• Number of students
• Course location
• DO NOT treat on-range exercises as a game or a challenge – this promotes driving as being a
thrill-seeking activity and leads to risk-taking
• DO NOT suggest that skilful driving can reduce the likelihood of a crash – this encourages
delayed responses to emerging hazards
• DO NOT suggest that high safety ratings (e.g. ANCAP) of a car will prevent a crash – high
safety ratings may reduce driver and passenger injury in some situations, but do not ensure
safety and do not protect other road users.
Recommended reading
Queensland Government. (2019). PrepL Supervisor Course. Available at:
https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/licensing/getting/learner/prepl/prepl-supervisor-course