P

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANGEMENT

SECURITYANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO

MANAGEMENT
MBA 341F

Course Pack
 III Trimester
February- April 2024
Batch: 2023-25

SECURITY ANALYSIS AND PORTFOLIO

MANAGEMENT

Table Of Contents

SL.N Content
o
1 Vision and Mission
2 Syllabus
3 Course Plan
4 CIA I
5 CIA II
6 CIA III
7 Articles and Cases
 School of Business and Management
CHRIST (Deemed to be University)
Course Plan

Program Master of Business Administration

Course Code & Name MBA 341F: Security Analysis and

 Portfolio Management

Trimester Third Trimester; Feb- May 2023

 School of Business and Management
CHRIST (Deemed to be University)
Course Plan

Program Master of Business Administration

MBA 341F: Security Analysis and

Course Code & Name Portfolio Management

Trimester Third Trimester; Feb- April 2024

Hours & Credits (1 Credit = 10 hours) 30 hours, 3 Credits

Course Anchor Dr. Nisha Shankar

Course Facilitators at – Bangalore, Dr. Nisha Shankar, Prof. Ravikumar,

Central Campus Ms. Aneeta Elsa Simon

Course Facilitators at – Dr. Ravindra Babu, Prof. Akash Anand

Bangalore,Kengeri Campus

Course Facilitators at – Bangalore, Dr. Deepika SR

BGR Campus

Course Facilitators at – Delhi, NCR Dr.Tapas Das

Campus

Course Facilitators at – Pune,

LavasaCampus

Dr. Nisha Shankar

Course Anchor & Faculty Contact Central Campus,
information CHRIST (Deemed to be University),
Bangalore
Course Name: Security Analysis and Course Code: MBA 341F
Portfolio Management
Total number of hours: 30 Credits: 3

Course Name: Security Analysis and Course Code: MBA 341F

Portfolio Management
Total number of hours: 30 Credits: 3

Course This course introduces students to financial markets, instruments and trading of securities.
Description It enables students to measure risk and return of different securities. Modern portfolio
theory and importance of asset allocation are discussed in detail. Portfolio optimization and
efficient diversification are also dealt with in detail. Portfolio evaluation using different
metrics will give students a good understanding of how to measure portfolio performance.

Course  To comprehend the functioning of securities market from a global perspective.

Objectives  To compute risk and return of different securities
 To evaluate capital market securities, namely a bond or equity.
 To analyse the importance of modern portfolio theories in designing portfolio
 To create optimum portfolios comprising of sustainable securities

Terminology** AACSB NBA

Program Learning Goals (PLGs) Program Outcomes (POs)

Program Learning Objective (PLO)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLO) Course Outcomes (COs)

Progamme Learning Goals –Course Objective Matrix (AACSB)/ NBA
Sl. CLO/CO RBT Uni CIA PLO PLG PO(Level
No t )
1 Identify the 1 PLO5.1 PLG5 PO4(2)
securities Global
CIA I,
market from a L3 Awareness
II
global
perspective
2 2 PLO2.2 PLG2 PO2(3)
Analyse Risk Functional
and return of CIA I, Knowledge
L4
different II and
securities Application

3 Apply 3 PLO2.1 PLG2 PO1(2)

fundamental Functional
and technical Knowledge
CIA II
analysis on L3 and
(MTE)
stock selection Application
for creating a
portfolio
4 Examine 4 PLO4.2 PLG4 PO2(2)
modern Critical
portfolio Thinking
theories for L4 CIA III
optimal
portfolio
construction
5 Evaluate 4&5 PLO4.4 PLG4 PO2
optimum Critical &PO8 (2)
portfolios Thinking
L5 CIA III
comprising of
sustainable
securities
Syllabus
Course Name: Security Analysis and Portfolio Management (SAPM) Course Code: MBA341F
Total number of hours: 30 Hours Credits: 3
Course Description: This course is offered as a finance elective for the MBA programme. It develops an investment attitude and prepares
students for careers in the areas of finance and investment. Students opting for finance specialization would find this course to be important
as its applications can be seen while understanding financial markets
Course Objectives: This course attempts to develop a conceptual and analytical understanding of framework of evaluating financial
instruments & markets and inculcates investment intelligence in students.
Course Learning Outcomes: On having completed this course student should be able to:
CLO1 Comprehend the functioning of securities market and its functioning from a global Perspective
CLO2 Compute risk and return of different securities
CLO3 Evaluate Capital market securities that is equity and bond
CLO4 Create optimum portfolios of different securities
CLO5 Appraise Emerging trends in the Securities markets
Pedagogy: This course uses multiple pedagogies like interactive lecture, student’s discussions, mock trading, excel computations
Syllabus
Unit I Introduction: The Investment Background – 6 hours
Overview of the Investment Environment and Investment Process; Organization and Functioning of securities markets - types of markets,
issues, orders and trading strategies; securities trading (trading cost, short sales, margin trading); Security market indices - Stock market
indices; Bond market indices. The investment setting - What is an investment? The Asset Allocation decision - Individual investor life cycle;
the need for a policy statement; Input to the policy statement; constructing the policy statement; the importance of asset allocation,
Introduction to Global stock markets

Unit II Risk and Return Analysis - 6 hours )

Introduction to Risk – Return Trade-off, Measures, Analysis, Determinants of Required Rates of Return and Relationship between Risk and
Return, Risk-free rate and its influencing factors and Risk Premium:

An introduction to asset pricing models – Capital Market Theory: An overview; The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Expected return and risk;
relationship between Systematic risk and return; Equilibrium and Disequilibrium; Multifactor Models of risk and return – Arbitrage Pricing
Theory;

Unit III Asset Valuation - 6 hours

Equity Valuation
Economic Analysis – Macroeconomic activities and security markets, The Cyclical Indicator Approach: Industry Analysis – Business Cycles
and industry sectors, Evaluating Industry life cycle, analysis of industry competition and industry rate of returns: Company Analysis, SWOT
Analysis; Technical Analysis – Assumption, Advantages, Challenges, Types of Charts, Technical Trading Rules and Indicators

Unit IV Portfolio Theory and Practice 6 hours

Introduction to Efficient Market Hypothesis, Random Walk Model, Forms of EMH, Empirical Evidence- Tests and results of EMH; Implications
of efficient capital markets;
Introduction to Portfolio Management - Measures of risk, return and utility; Markowitz portfolio Theory; Covariance and correlation of returns;
portfolio return; portfolio risk; capital allocation; optimal risky portfolios; index models

Passive Vs Active management; asset allocation strategies; evaluation of portfolio performance –application of portfolio performance
measures; Bond portfolio building and evaluation

Unit V Portfolio revision and rebalancing strategies 6 hours

Approaches to portfolio rebalancing, Issues in portfolio rebalancing, Frequency, Extensiveness, Transaction costs, Uses of index and futures
funds, Equity Portfolio, Management Strategies, Active management, Dimensions, Optimal residual risk, Benchmark selection, Style, Types,
Value, Growth, Size, Management, Rotation, Returns, Inconsistency, Style weights, Style drift, Limitations, Long-short strategies, The
Treynor-Black Optimizing Model, Factor models, Contrarian strategies, Within industries, Specialized managers (e.g., REIT managers),
Scope of active managers, Alpha sources, Portfolio segmentation techniques, Tracking error optimization, Setting tactical ranges, Market
cap issues, Small cap portfolios, Quantitative management, Tax aware equity investing, Costs vs. Benefits of active management, Law
Constrained active management, Effect of portfolio size, Passive management, Motivation, Economic impact

[Total 30 Hours]
Essential Reading
Bodie, Kane, Marcus and Mohanty., Investments (10th ed.). Tata McGraw Hill Publications.
Recommended Reading
1. Reilly. & Brown. (2012). Analysis of Investments & Management of Portfolios (12th ed.). CENGAGE Learning.
2. Chandra, Prasanna. (2008). Investment analysis and portfolio management. New Delhi: Tata McGraw – Hill Publications.
3. Fischer.,& Jordan., Security analysis and portfolio management. Prentice Hall Publications.
4. Bhalla, V. K., Investment management, S. Chand & Co Publications.
5. Kevin S.(2008). Security Analysis & Portfolio Management, New Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt Ltd Publications.
6. Brealey.,& Myers., Principles of corporate finance (7th ed.). Tata McGraw Hill Publications
SAPM - Course Mapping
Unit Sessio Unit details Wee CLO Exercise Pedagogy Resource/
numbe n k & s Reference
r PLO details
Unit 1 1 CLO Class Discussion & Ch. 1
Introduction to the Investment Environment 1 Assignment (BKMM);
Real vs Financial Asset, Asset Classes, Players in PLO Ch.2 (R&B)
Financial Markets. Overview of Investment 5.1 for Asset
Process - Asset Allocation Decision, security Allocation
selection, security analysis Decision
Week
2 CLO Class Discussion & Ch. 2
1 Assignment (BKMM);
1
Organisation and Functioning of Securities PLO Ch.3 (R&B)
Market. National & International (Types of issues; 5.1 Case analysis 1:
types of markets; types of orders; types of trading Narayana Health:
mechanisms; new trading strategies) The Initial Public
Offering Decision
(2017)
3 Security Trading (Trading costs; buying on Week CLO Class discussion, Ch. 3
margin; short sales; security market index) 2 1 Excel Worksheets (BKMM);
PLO Ch.2; Ch.3;
5.1 Ch. 5 (R&B
for Security
market index
Ques 4,5,6
Page 134)

Bodie & Kane

– Page 45 – 48
Concept check
2.4 and 2.5,
Example 2.2
and 2.3.
 Computation
of Sensex
Pg55
4 Risk And Return Analysis CLO Lecture Ch. 5
Risk free asset and Risk-free rate (real; nominal; 2 Discussion; Stock (BKMM);
factors influencing nominal RFR); Risk, Types of PLO Price data Ch 5 & Ch. 1
Risk and Risk Premium; Risky Asset (measures of 2.2 extraction from (R&B; Ques
Historical Rate of Returns - Holding Period www.nseindia.com 3,5,7,9,12;
Return, Holding Period Yield; expected rate of ; Excel Page 27,28)
Unit 2 return; measure of risk of expected rate of return, Calculations
variance, standard deviation, coefficient of Bodie & Kane
variance); Required Rate of Return; Utility from – pg 128-
investment; Stock Price data extraction from Example 5.1,
www.nseindia.com; Excel Calculations 5.2, 5.3 &5.4 –
Pg 131&132

5 Single Index Model; Multifactor models and CLO Class Discussion Ch. 8 &
Arbitrage Pricing Theory 4 through Excel Ch.10(BKMM
PLO )
4.2
CIA-1 Assignment CLO
2
PLO
2.1
&
PLO
2.2
6 Fundamental Analysis & Technical Analysis Week CLO Discussion Ch
Fundamental analysis- Determinants of value of 3 3 17(BKMM);
such as earning prospects Macroeconomic and PLO CRISIL report
industry analysis – Domestic macro economy 2.1 on Indian
Business cycle - Economic indicators Economy;
URL1
7 Industry analysis- defining an industry -Industry CLO Case analysis 2: Ch
 and ratios 3 Identify Indian 17(BKMM);
Defining industry- sensitivity to business cycles- PLO Industry. Case study
industry structure and performance 2.1 Discussion with the Ch 17; CRISIL
data from Ace report on
analyser Industry
Cement sector
Unit 3 8 Market valuation, relative valuation drivers of PE Week CLO Discussion with Ch 18
ratio, Price to book ratios- Capital structure-book 4 3 data from ace (BKMM)
value and market value of different industries PLO analyser
2.1

9 Free cash flow (FCF) model CLO Excel calculation Ch 18

Relative Valuation Models 3 for FCF valuation. (BKMM)
PLO Discussion with Excel exercise
2.1 data from ace & Discussion
analyser
10 Technical Analysis (introduction) Week CLO Lecture Discussion Ch. 12
5 3 (BKMM);
PLO URL 2
4.1
Technical Analysis (Application and Practice), CLO Workshop by an Ch.12(BKMM
Moving Average, MACD, RSI, ROC, Charts & 3 industry expert & )
Patterns, Japanese Candle stick PLO Analysis using
2.1 Track Invest

11 Bond (Introduction, Pricing and Term Structure of CLO Class Discussion; Ch. 14 and Ch.
Interest rates) 3 Excel Exercise 15; HBR Fixed
PLO Income
2.1 Securities
Problems
12 Bond Portfolio Management (Interest rate risk, CLO Class Discussion; Ch. 14 and Ch.
duration, convexity) 3 Excel Exercise 15; HBR Fixed
PLO Income
 2.1 Securities
Problems
13 Part III - Portfolio Management Week CLO Class Discussion; Ch.7(BKMM)
Portfolio Maths and Capital Allocation 6 &7 4 Excel Exercise
(Markowitz Theory; covariance and correlation of PLO
returns; portfolio return; portfolio risk) 4.2

Unit 4
14 Portfolio Maths and Capital Allocation CLO Class Discussion; Ch.7
(Markowitz Theory; covariance and correlation of 4 Excel Exercise Ch. 7 (R&B)
returns; portfolio return; portfolio risk) PLO
4.2

Mid Term Exam

15 Risky Assets and Optimal Capital Allocation Week CLO Class Discussion; Ch.6 &
(Efficient Frontier, Optimal Risky Portfolio) 8 4 Excel Exercise Ch.7(BKMM)
PLO Case analysis 3: Ch. 6&7 (R&B
4.2 Kapoor’s Portfolio

Unit 4 16 Efficient Market Hypothesis CLO Class Discussion Ch. 11 and Ch.
4 12(BKMM)
PLO
4.2
17 Portfolio Performance Measurement, Passive Vs Week CLO Class Discussion; Ch.
Active management; asset allocation 9 4 Excel Exercise 24(BKMM)
strategies; evaluation of portfolio PLO
performance –application of portfolio 4.2
performance measures; Bond portfolio
building and evaluation

18 Optimal Portfolio Construction CLO Using Excel Solver Ch.7(BKMM)

4
 PLO
4.2

19 Approaches to portfolio rebalancing, Issues in Week CLO Class Discussion;

portfolio rebalancing, Frequency, 10 & 5
Extensiveness, Transaction costs, Uses of 11 PLO
index and futures funds, Equity Portfolio, 4.4
Management Strategies, Active
management, Dimensions
20 Optimal residual risk, Benchmark selection, Week CLO Class Discussion
Style, Types, Value, Growth, Size, 10 & 5
Management, Rotation, Returns, 11 PLO Case analysis 4:
Inconsistency, Style weights, Style drift, Week 4.4 Warren E Buffet Discussion
Limitations, Long-short strategies, The 11 materials
Treynor-Black Optimizing Model, Factor
models
Unit 5
Contrarian strategies, Within industries, Class Discussion
Specialized managers (e.g., REIT
managers), Scope of active managers, Alpha
sources, Portfolio segmentation techniques,
Tracking error optimization, Setting tactical
ranges, Market cap issues, Small cap
portfolios
Quantitative management, Tax aware equity Week CLO Class Discussion
investing, Costs vs. Benefits of active 11 5
management, Law Constrained active PLO
management, Effect of portfolio size, Passive 1.3
management, Motivation, Economic impact

CASE STUDIES
Module Name of Case and Description Publisher

Case 1: Narayana Health: The Initial Public Offering Decision (2017) HBP
Part I: Description: This case was written to help students understand different motives behind going public. It discusses different choices for
Primary raising capital and documents the methods commonly used in the industry for valuing companies in order to arrive at an appropriate
markets offer price band. The case requires students to arrive at a suitable share price by considering the financial performance of the company,
pros and cons of the company's strategy and business model, the industry's future growth potential, and macroeconomic factors. It also
provides insights about IPO under-pricing, a commonly observed phenomenon across markets.
Case 2: Identify Indian Industry IMCU, CHRIST
Part II:
Fundamental Description: Financial data of Indian companies from different industries have been provided. Students are asked to identify the
Analysis industry based on their observation of difference in financial structures.

Case 3: Kapoor’s Portfolio (2015) HBP

Part III: Risk
& Return Description: The case follows a trainee portfolio manager in her attempt to build an investment portfolio using stocks on India's
Analysis National Stock Exchange (NSE). Within the framework of the capital asset pricing model, this note focuses on the computation of
financial returns, risk and diversification strategies.

Case 4: Warren E Buffet (2015) HBP

Part IV:
Portfolio
Management Set in August 2015, students are asked to evaluate Warren Buffett's decision to acquire the aerospace-parts supplier Precision Castparts
Corporation (PCP), which would be the largest-ever deal for Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett's holding company.

SUGGESTED ADDITIONAL READINGS

S No Article Publisher
1 Putting Integrity into Finance Rotman Management
2 Disciplined Decisions: Aligning strategy with financial markets HBR
3 How Investor’s Reading habits affect stock Prices HBR
4 Does the asset pricing model work? HBR
5 What is your Real Cost of Capital HBR
 6 Sustainability -The Investor Revolution HBR
7 Financial Markets-The State of socially responsible Investing HBR

ASSESSMENT OUTLINE

CIA-1: Risk-Return Computations (15 Marks)

Component A: Quiz MCQ (20 marks scaled down to 5 marks)

Assignment description:
 Moodle administered quiz of at least 20 questions (15 minutes)
 Learning outcomes: CLO1/CO1
 Evaluation Rubric: Answers will be evaluated in Moodle based on the answer key

Component B: Risk-Return Computations (15 marks scaled down to 10 marks)

Assignment Description:
 Students are required to do risk-return computation in Microsoft Excel for 3 different asset classes using actual historical data for two
 periods. They are also required to comparative analysis of risk and return across asset classes and across time periods.
 Learning outcomes: CLO1/CO1& CLO2/CO2

CIA II: Mid-term examination (25 marks)

 2 hours examination
 Units – I, II and part of III (Concerned faculty will give detailed information on this in class)
 There would be Two Sections – Section A – 3 questions of 5 marks each – 15 Marks
Section B- Case Study – 10 Marks
 Learning outcomes: CLO1/CO1, CLO2/CO2 & CLO3/CO3

CIA III: Portfolio Construction (40 marks scaled down to 15 marks)

Assignment Details:
 Taking inputs from the mock trading platform, students are required to select five stocks
 At least one stock selected should be a sustainable stock
 Do top-down fundamental analysis on the securities selected
 Build three portfolios using the five stocks following – 1) equal allocation, 2) random allocation and 3) optimal allocation
 Compare risk-return comparison and portfolio performance evaluation of all three different portfolios
 Learning outcomes: CLO4/CO4 & CLO5/CO5

Assessment Outline

Component Description Units Maximum Weightagefor Total

marks for the the course
 Component
CIA1(A) Quiz 1&2 5 5%
CIA1(B) Assignment 2 10 10%
CIA2 Mid-term 1,2 &3, 25 25%
(Partly)
CIA3 Assignment 4&5 15 15%
ETE All 30 30%
Class Participation All 15 15%
Total 100 100%

Important Note:
Class participation will be assessed through different mechanisms (such as case study submission, contribution to the class learning, interaction,
pre-class quiz etc., as devised by the instructor.

CIA Evaluation Rubrics (AACSB and NBA)

CIA- 1 Component A – MCQ (20 marks scaled down to 5 marks)

 Assignment description: Moodle administered quiz of at least 20 questions (15 minutes)

 Evaluation Rubric: Answers will be evaluated in Moodle based on the answer key

CIA- 1 Component B – Asset risk returns (20 marks scaled down to 10 marks)

CIA-1: Risk-Return Computations

Assignment Description:
Students are required to undertake risk and return computation in Microsoft Excel for 3 different asset classes using actual historical data for two
periods. They are also required to comparative analysis of risk and return across asset classes and across time periods.

Learning Outcome
1. To identify the securities market and get familiarize with stock market data sources and data extraction from list of companies listed on BSE
and an International Stock market (Nasdaq/NYSE) and availability of other assets' data
2. To analyse the changes in risk and return over a period of time
3. To compare the performance across asset classes
4. To develop justifiable performance interpretations across asset classes
Instructions:
1. Data Requirements: Compile "monthly" historical data over last 10 years for the following assets-
a. Each student to select any two stocks- one from BSE 500 from bseindia.com and the other from NYSE or NASDAQ
b. India 10-Year Bond Yield from investing.com
c. Gold Price in INR from indiastat.com
d. S&P BSE SENSEX index
2. Calculate the log return for each month for all assets (except bond)
3. No two students can take the same company. Enter the details of the company you selected on the spreadsheet circulated by the
faculty.

4. Computation Requirements:
a. Compute holding period return,
b. Compute holding period yield,
c. Compute standard deviation for each company for the two time periods as mentioned in the table,
d. Compute of coefficient of variation
e. Plot a risk-return graph depicting all the 5 assets in one graph
5. Analysis Requirement:
a. Do comparative analysis and mention one significant reason that you think explains the difference in risk and return
Submission details
1. Only online submission through excel on Moodle
2. Last date of submission – TBD
3. Individual submission
4. There will be penalty for late submissions and duplication of companies

CIAI Rubrics

Program PLG 2, PLG5

Learning
Objective
Program PLO 2.2- PLO 5.1
Learning
Outomes
Total Marks 10 Marks
Criteria / CO- Excellent (5) Very Good (4) Good (3) Average(2) Needs
Weightage/PL PO Improvement(1)
O
Identify the CLO Identification of Identification of Identification of Identification of Identification of
securities 1, all 5 assets - all 4 assets- all 3-4 assets- all 1-2 assets all 1-2 assets
market (PLO PO4 both BSE and both BSE and both BSE and from BSE and only from BSE
5.1) 25% NSE/Nasdaq NSE/Nasdaq NSE/Nasdaq NSE/Nasdaq
Analyse the CLO All 4 analysis 3-4 analysis are 1-2 analysis are Error in
returns and 2 are correct correct correct analysis
PO2 All five analysis
risk changes -
are correct
(PLO 2.2) -
30%

Compare the CLO All comparisons Most of the Most of the Few Few
2 are done comparisons are comparisons are comparisons are comparisons are
 Performance PO2 accurately done accurately done fairly done accurately done vaguely
backed by clear backed by clear accurately backed by clear lacking clarity
(PLO 2.2)-
reasons reasons backed by clear reasons
20% reasons
Develop CLO Interpretations Interpretations Interpretations Interpretations Intrepretations
2 are accurate and are accurate and are accurate and are fairly lack clarity
justifiable
PO2 fully justifiable fairly justifiable somewhat accurate and
performance with consisitency with consisitency justifiable with justifiable
limited
interpretations
consisitency
(PLO 2.2)-
25%
*Weightage (Levels) can vary depending on assignments

CIA III: – Portfolio Construction (40 marks scaled down to 20 marks)

Assignment Details:
Students are required to compare risk-return comparison and portfolio performance evaluation of three different portfolios created using
the five stocks including at least one sustainable stock shortlisted from Fundamental Analysis. They are also required to do top-down
analysis on their securities selection and weights combination.
Learning Outcome
1. To analyse using appropriate computations for portfolio construction
2. To determine the Optimum portfolio
3. To assess the portfolio performance
4. To recommend the optimum portfolio based on portfolio performance
Instructions
a. Data Requirements:
a. Student shall select 5 stocks including at least one sustainable stock
b. Collect daily CLOSING price data for the most recent 40 trading days for all the 5 stocks
b. Inputs Requirements:
a) Compute daily log returns for all 5 stocks
b) Compute mean daily return and standard deviation for all the five stocks
c) Create covariance and correlation matrix for all the five stocks (5 * 5 matrix): Please refer to the guide attached.
c. Portfolio Analysis:
a) Create three portfolios: (Each of the three portfolios must have all 5 stocks in it.)
i) Portfolio 1: each stock with equal weight
ii) Two more Portfolios: any weight structure (different from above)
b) Compute portfolio return and risk for each portfolio
c) Create a risk-return scatter plot and enter risk and return for the individual stocks as well as the three portfolios. Also plot
efficient frontier.
d) Conduct portfolio evaluation for the optimum portfolio using Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen and M2 methods
d. Portfolio Selection Rationale Requirements:
a. Objective of investment?
b. Policy statement of investor defined in terms of target return and acceptable risk, and objective of investment.
c. Reason for selecting the industries for investment?
d. Reason for selecting the stock from respective industries?
e. Reason for selecting the weights for portfolio creation?
e. Interpretation Requirements:
a. Does changing weights of stocks in portfolio impact portfolio return and risk?
b. Degree of impact (compare risk and return of different portfolios)?
c. Comment on the different degree of diversification present in these three different portfolios.
Submission Guidelines:
 1) It is an individual assignment. There will be penalty for late submissions
2) Submission: In Excel. Please don't attach multiple excel files. Just one excel file per student. Use multiple sheets within same excel
file.
4)Name of Excel File: CIA3 (Comp. 1 _ROLL NUMBER_STUDENT NAME

CIA III- Evaluation Rubrics (AACSB and NBA)

Program Learning PLG4

Objective
Program Learning PLO 4.2, PLO 4.4
Outomes
Total Marks 15 Marks
Criteria / Weightage/PLO CO- Excellent (5) Very Good Good (3) Average (2) Needs
PO (4) Improvement (1)
Analyse using CLO All 5 analysis All 4 analysis Partly correct Partly correct Error in
appropriate 4 are correct are correct analysis: 3-4 – 2-3 analysis analysis
computations (PLO 4.2) PO2 analysis are
30% correct
Determine the Optimum CLO All computations Most of the Most of the Some of the Error in
5 are accurate computations computations computations computations
portfolio (PLO 4.4)- PO2 are accurate are are fairly
20% fairlyaccurate accurate

Assess the portfolio CLO Performance Performance Performance Performance Performance

4 evaluation and evaluation evaluation evaluation evaluation and
performance- (PLO PO2 comparison and and and comparison done
4.2)- 30% done accurately comparison comparison comparison poorly using
using all done fairly done fairly done some of the
measures accurately accurately moderately measures
using all using some of using some of
 measures the measures the measures
Recommend portfolio CLO Clear and Clear and Clear and Clear and Interpretations
performance 5 relevant relevant relevant relevant are vague,
interpretation -( PLO PO2 interpretation interpretation interpretation interpretation lacking clarity
4.4)- 20% provided for all provided for provided for 2 provided for 1 and not relevant
3 all 3 of the of the from investors'
“Interpretation “Interpretatio “Interpretatio “Interpretatio perspective
requirements” n n n
requirements” requirements” requirements”
*Weightage (Levels) can vary depending on assignments

Prepared by
(Faculty in-charge) Reviewed by Approved by
HoD